My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 28 - Urban Water Management Plan and Water Shortage Contingency Plan
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2021
>
06/01/2021 Regular
>
Item 28 - Urban Water Management Plan and Water Shortage Contingency Plan
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/21/2023 4:26:08 PM
Creation date
8/21/2023 4:24:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Clerk of the Council
Item #
28
Date
6/1/2021
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
226
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Metropolitan Demand Management Programs <br />Demand management costs are Metropolitan’s expenditures for funding local water resource development <br />programs and water conservation programs. These Demand Management Programs incentivize the development of <br />local water supplies and the conservation of water to reduce the need to import water to deliver to Metropolitan’s <br />member agencies. These programs are implemented below the delivery points between Metropolitan’s and its <br />member agencies’ distribution systems and, as such, do not add any water to Metropolitan’s supplies. Rather, the <br />effect of these downstream programs is to produce a local supply of water for the local agencies and to reduce <br />demands by member agencies for water imported through Metropolitan’s system. The following discussions outline <br />how Metropolitan funds local resources and conservation programs for the benefit of all of its member agencies and <br />the entire Metropolitan service area. Notably, the history of demand management by Metropolitan’s member <br />agencies and the local agencies that purchase water from Metropolitan’s members has spanned more than four <br />decades. The significant history of the programs is another reason it would be difficult to attempt to assign a portion <br />of such funding to any one individual member agency. <br />Local Resources Programs <br />In 1982, Metropolitan began providing financial incentives to its member agencies to develop new local supplies to <br />assist in meeting the region’s water needs. Because of Metropolitan’s regional distribution system, these programs <br />benefit all member agencies regardless of project location because they help to increase regional water supply <br />reliability, reduce demands for imported water supplies, decrease the burden on Metropolitan’s infrastructure, <br />reduce system costs and free up conveyance capacity to the benefit of all the agencies that rely on water from <br />Metropolitan. <br />For example, the Groundwater Replenishment System (GWRS) operated by the Orange County Water District is the
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.