Laserfiche WebLink
STIFEL <br />Marketing Plan <br />Stifel will employ a 3-point marketing plan for the City's POBs. <br />Early Outreach to Anchor Investors. Beginning about one month before the POBs come to market, Stifel will begin to <br />communicate with potential anchor investors. Stifel's California based salesforce will target domestic institutional <br />accounts while working concurrently with Stifel Europe to communicate with international accounts. Based on their <br />feedback we can begin tracking where they are buying and trading similar credits, giving us a better understanding of <br />where they will price this credit. <br />2. Drone Video/Investor Presentation. Many underwriters have used 'flat' <br />investor presentations to accompany the sale of POBs. We would prefer <br />to show a more dynamic presentation of the community, describe the <br />vision that Council and management have for the City and provide <br />context of the City's strategic location within Orange County. As noted <br />in our cover letter, along with our proposal, we provide a brief video <br />that would be used to market the City's POBs. <br />3. Local Retail Marketing Plan. Newspaper ads in local publications (both <br />print and online editions) will be used to publicize the bond sale to <br />tsevsw.aoo---• <br />Daily Pilot_ <br />- _ MFEL <br />�3 ;� 5 mple St fel PosxaN <br />_ <br />s:, :.mom <br />5 <br />:.A <br />,AdP,oe,am�AOPd1 <br />g ild <br />residents. Stifel would place ads, at no cost to the City, in publications like the Los Angeles Times, the Orange County <br />Register and The Daily Pilot. Recent examples of our local retail marketing campaign efforts are provided in the <br />accompanying graphic. <br />E. In what circumstances, if any, would you recommend a private placement of POBs rather than a public offering? What would be the pros and cons of such a strategy? <br />For a transaction as large as the City's, we do not believe a private placement will produce a better result than a public <br />bond sale. A private placement would be set as one blended interest rate (with more weight given to the final maturity of <br />the POBs) whereas a public bond offering would enable the City to divide the issuance into smaller pieces by serializing <br />the Bonds (years 1-15) and then splitting up the remainder of the issue with multiple term bonds. <br />F. Describe a recent engagement your firm was involved in a debt issuance in which there were multiple underwriters engaged. <br />We have had the pleasure of serving as lead manager of a multi -firm syndicate on several recent POBs, including the <br />Orange POBs that priced last Thursday (3/3) and upcoming Huntington Beach POBs, which are scheduled to price next <br />week. Our goal as lead manager is to foster a collaborative environment that leverages the strengths of each co- <br />manager to secure the best possible outcome (lowest borrowing cost) for our issuer clients. As mentioned in our cover <br />letter, at the request of the city, advisor and in coordination with our co -manager, we seamlessly expedited the pricing <br />period from a 2 to 1-day process for the recent Orange POBs to lock -in aggressive interest rates amidst market volatility. <br />The strategy paid off as, over the next two days, US Treasury yields increased up to 9 basis points throughout the yield <br />curve. <br />City of Santa Ana I Proposal to Provide Underwriting Services Page 14 <br />