My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 27 - Appeal Application Nos. 2020-03 and 2020-04 - Central Pointe Mixed-Use Development
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2021
>
01/19/2021 Regular
>
Item 27 - Appeal Application Nos. 2020-03 and 2020-04 - Central Pointe Mixed-Use Development
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/10/2024 2:34:56 PM
Creation date
8/22/2023 9:23:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Clerk of the Council
Item #
27
Date
1/19/2021
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
694
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SWRCC APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL OF CENTRAL POINTE PROJECT <br />2) (continued) the goal of providing affordable housing opportunities throughout the city. The <br />Commission failed to address this issue and the project may not qualify to come under the <br />Santa Ana Housing Opportunity Ordinance. SAMC 41-1607 and Public Res. Code Section 15162, <br />3) The Planning Commission failed to adequately address the well being of the community in <br />ensuring that qualified Santa Ana residents, veterans and graduates or certificate holders of <br />Santa Ana Unified School District and Rancho Santiago Community College District are provided <br />a process to be included as part of the workforce constructing the project, thus ensuring the <br />workforce would be more likely to have received safety training, reducing the risk of on the job <br />injuries and construction defects and also increasing the economic benefit of the project and <br />well being of the city residents. <br />4) Failure of the Planning Commission to ensure the maximum amount of viable commercial <br />development on the project. While the staff did push the developer to add more commercial <br />space and the developer agreed to an increase, the failure to require the maximum viable <br />square footage of commercial space will lead to greater vehicle trips from the residents to <br />commercial areas both withing Santa Ana as described in the Commission report, areas that are <br />already inundated with traffic, but also to Tustin, sending sales tax revenue out of Santa Ana. <br />This traffic increase due to the inadequate commercial sites that will exist to serve these new <br />residents was not adequately studied by the Commission, something required under California <br />environmental laws. <br />The Carpenters requested a 30-60 day continuance by the Commission so these issues could be <br />addressed but there was no action by the developer to respond to these issues in the only two <br />week continuance due to a lack of a quorum. These issues are curable and the SWRCC are not <br />trying to impede development but ensure that Santa Ana receives the maximum benefit on this <br />valuable, strategic site. We ask the Council to have the developer applicant work with the <br />SWRCC and other interested parties on the issues raised before the project is approved. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.