My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 27 - Appeal Application Nos. 2020-03 and 2020-04 - Central Pointe Mixed-Use Development
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2021
>
01/19/2021 Regular
>
Item 27 - Appeal Application Nos. 2020-03 and 2020-04 - Central Pointe Mixed-Use Development
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/10/2024 2:34:56 PM
Creation date
8/22/2023 9:23:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Clerk of the Council
Item #
27
Date
1/19/2021
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
694
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Review of column (4) of Table 8-3 indicates that two (2) intersections are significantly impacted by <br />the Project under Year 2040 Buildout Plus Project traffic conditions, which include I-5 NB <br />Ramps/4th Street and SR-55 SB Ramps/4th Street. Review of column (5) indicates that the <br />implementation of planned and/or recommended improvements at the intersections will help offset <br />the Project's impact. Planned and recommended improvements are discussed in Section 11.0. <br />Although the intersection of Elk Lane/First Street operates adversely during the PM peak hour, the <br />proposed Project adds less than 0.010 increment to the ICU value and is therefore not considered <br />significantly impacted based on the LOS standards and impact criteria specified in this report. <br />Although Cabrillo Park Drive/Park Court Place operates adversely during the PM peak hour, a <br />traffic signal is not warranted during the PM peak hour and therefore the intersection is not <br />considered significantly impacted based on the LOS standards and impact criteria specified in this <br />report. However, a traffic signal is warranted during the AM peak hour and therefore it is <br />recommended to implement improvements at the intersection to help achieve acceptable level of <br />service. Review of column (5) indicates that the installation of a two-phase traffic signal at this <br />intersection would help improve the intersection and result in an acceptable level of service. It <br />should be noted that the installation of a two-phase traffic signal would be in place of previously <br />identified improvements at the intersection (i.e. median diverters to prohibit cross -traffic) as <br />documented in the Traffic Impact Study for the Metro East Overlay Zone in the City of Santa Ana. <br />Appendix D also presents the long-term ICU/LOS and HCM/LOS calculations for the twenty-five <br />(25) key study intersections. Appendix H presents the signal warrant worksheets for the intersection <br />of Cabrillo Park Drive/Park Court Place. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.