Laserfiche WebLink
2. Assessment <br />Appropriateness of Methodology <br />In the preamble, the Report states as its goal to "identify the highest and best use of the project under current <br />MEMU zoning and demonstrate financial viability of the development." <br />Identification of highest and best use typically involves comparison of multiple potential land uses using proforma <br />analysis to estimate potential project returns or residual land value. Determination of financial viability may also rely <br />on proforma analysis to estimate Net Operating Income (NOI) and development costs. While the Report features <br />multiple exhibits that demonstrate key inputs and parameters that could be incorporated into proforma analysis, no <br />such additional analysis is conducted to test for highest best use and financial viability. <br />Multi -Family Market Analysis <br />The Multi -Family Residential (MFR) market analysis clearly demonstrates potential achievable rents for the units <br />proposed in the project. The Report's assumptions and data are consistent with previous analysis conducted by <br />AECOM of the residential market, and the Report's conclusions are supported by the analysis. <br />The rents, absorption rates, vacancies, and unit mixes presented in the comparative analysis are broadly <br />representative of the competitive market area. While the proposed rents represent the upper range for the market <br />areas examined, they may be justifiable by the desirable location and the quality of proposed amenities. The Project <br />unit mix, which emphasizes 1-BR units (51 percent) and 2-BR units (39 percent), appears to be optimized to take <br />advantage of market area trends, which indicate that smaller units command higher rents (on a square -foot -basis) <br />and achieve lower vacancy rates than 3-BR units. <br />Retail Market Analysis <br />The City is particularly interested in the potential for the Project to include retail space to support the mixed -use <br />nature of the MEMU land use designation. The proposed Project currently contains 15,200 square feet of retail <br />space, and the Report justifies this quantity through arguments regarding Project location, general retail market <br />trends, and comparison with other established mixed -use projects. AECOM has supplemented this analysis with retail <br />leakage/surplus analysis and a retail demand model and concurs that under normal market conditions,15,200 square <br />feet is supportable. However, as the long-term market impact of COVID-19 on retail performance is not known, <br />caution regarding retail expansion is warranted. <br />The Report features a comparison with three existing mixed -use projects in Orange County that highlight the potential <br />difficulty the Project may face attracting and retaining retail tenants. Two of these comparison projects, which have a <br />similar walkability score as the Project, show vacancy rates of 70 percent and 56 percent. However, such rates are <br />not typical for retail in Orange County, as indicated by Figure 1, which shows retail vacancies fluctuating between 2.5 <br />percent and 6.5 percent between 2006 and 2020 in Orange County and within the 3-Mile Radius surrounding the <br />Project. While the comparison projects illustrate the potential difficulties of sustaining retail tenants in mixed -use <br />projects, the general retail market in Orange County has remained stable in the recent past. <br />