Laserfiche WebLink
This means the Project's emissions were calculated as if the Project was constructed with project <br />design features to reduce GHG emissions that are not required by state or local code and with <br />several regulatory measures adopted in furtherance of AB 32. <br />While the AB 32 Scoping Plan's cumulative statewide objectives were not intended to serve as <br />the basis for project -level assessments, this analysis finds that its Project Without Reduction <br />Features comparison based on the Scoping Plan is appropriate, because the Project would <br />contribute to statewide GHG emissions reduction goals. Specifically, the Project's mixed -use <br />nature and location in an existing urban setting provide opportunities to reduce transportation - <br />related emissions. First, it would capture vehicle travel on -site that would have normally been <br />destined for off -site locations. This produces substantial reductions in the amount of vehicle trips <br />and VMT that no longer are made. Second, it would eliminate many vehicle trips, because travel <br />to and from the Project Site could be captured by public transit and active transportation instead. <br />Finally, it would attract existing trips on the street network that would divert to the proposed <br />development. <br />Post-2030 Analysis <br />Recent studies show that the state's existing and proposed regulatory framework will put the state <br />on a pathway to reduce its GHG emissions level to 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030, and to <br />80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050 if additional appropriate reduction measures are adopted.76 <br />Even though these studies did not provide an exact regulatory and technological roadmap to <br />achieve the 2030 and 2050 goals, they demonstrated that various combinations of policies could <br />allow the statewide emissions level to remain very low through 2050, suggesting that the <br />combination of new technologies and other regulations not analyzed in the studies could allow <br />the state to meet the 2050 target. After the findings of these studies, SIB 32 was passed on <br />September 8, 2016, and would require the state board to ensure that statewide GHG emissions <br />are reduced to 40 percent below the 1990 level by 2030. As discussed above, the new plan, <br />outlined in SIB 32, involves increasing renewable energy use, imposing tighter limits on the carbon <br />content of gasoline and diesel fuel, putting more electric cars on the road, improving energy <br />efficiency, and curbing emissions from key industries. <br />As discussed above, SCAG's 2020-2045 RTP/SCS establishes a regulatory framework for <br />achieving GHG reductions from the land use and transportation sectors pursuant to SB 375 and <br />76 Energy and Environmental Economics (E3). "Summary of the California State Agencies' PATHWAYS <br />Project: Long-term Greenhouse Gas Reduction Scenarios" (April 2015); Greenblatt, Jeffrey, Energy <br />Policy, "Modeling California Impacts on Greenhouse Gas Emissions" (Vol. 78, pp. 158-172). The <br />California Air Resources Board, California Energy Commission, California Public Utilities <br />Commission, and the California Independent System Operator engaged E3 to evaluate the feasibility <br />and cost of a range of potential 2030 targets along the way to the state's goal of reducing GHG <br />emissions to 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050. With input from the agencies, E3 developed <br />scenarios that explore the potential pace at which emission reductions can be achieved, as well as the <br />mix of technologies and practices deployed. E3 conducted the analysis using its California PATHWAYS <br />model. Enhanced specifically for this study, the model encompasses the entire California economy with <br />detailed representations of the buildings, industry, transportation, and electricity sectors. <br />Cabrillo Town Center <br />PAGE 56 <br />18 — 1021 <br />City of Santa Ana <br />10/3/20 2023 <br />