My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 18 - Appeal Application Nos. 2023-02 and 2023-03 for Cabrillo Town Center project
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2023
>
10/03/2023 Regular
>
Item 18 - Appeal Application Nos. 2023-02 and 2023-03 for Cabrillo Town Center project
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/3/2023 11:38:41 AM
Creation date
10/3/2023 9:16:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Item #
18
Date
10/3/2023
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1768
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Nevertheless, a VMT Screening Assessment Memorandum <br />("Memo") has been produced for the Project for informational <br />purposes only, in response to this comment. The Memo <br />presents the VMT screening criteria, analysis methodology <br />and the conclusion. The approach and methodology outlined <br />in this Memo was consistent with the City of Santa Ana <br />Traffic Impact Study Guidelines (dated September 20199, <br />which states that several types of projects can be screened <br />out from a VMT assessment using identified criteria, <br />indicating that these projects have the potential to reduce <br />VMT per service population and result in a less -than - <br />significant transportation impacts. Moreover, this Memo was <br />thoroughly peer reviewed by the City's Traffic Engineer, who <br />concluded that the VMT memo prepared for the Project <br />shows the project is screened out from any full VMT <br />analysis. Further, the Traffic Engineer confirmed that the <br />Memo shows that the project is within a HQTA, and it is <br />consistent with the SCAG RTP/SCS. <br />Specifically, the Memo determines that the Project would not <br />result in VMT impacts because it is located within a HQTA, <br />where existing transit service provided by OCTA provides <br />service intervals no longer than 15 minutes during the peak <br />commute hours, and because the proposed land use was <br />consistent with the RTP/SCS as contained in SCAG's <br />adopted Connect SoCal (2020-2045 RTP/SCS). Therefore, <br />in accordance with the City of Santa Ana's guidelines, the <br />proposed Project was deemed to be exempt from the <br />preparation of any further VMT analysis and may be <br />presumed to have a less than significant CEQA-related <br />transportation impact. <br />c. The appellant contends that the Project requires new <br />feasible mitigation measures to mitigate greenhouse gas <br />impacts. <br />The topic of GHG emissions impacts was not included in the <br />CEQA Guidelines in place at the time the 2006 EIR was <br />certified, and as such, was not included in the Certified EIR's <br />analysis of the MEMU's potential impacts. However, both the <br />existence of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases <br />from fossil fuel combustion and other activities were known <br />at the time the Certified EIR was approved. Since the <br />approval of the Certified EIR, federal and state laws and <br />regulations have been adopted to reduce GHG emissions, <br />and the topic of GHG is included in the current version of the <br />CEQA Guidelines. A detailed analysis of the Project's GHG <br />Resolution No. 2023-xx <br />City Council 18 — 327 10/ 3 f 24 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.