Laserfiche WebLink
noise impacts from rooftop mechanical equipment on nearby <br />sensitive receptors would be negligible. First, most modern <br />heat pumps are relatively quiet, with sound ratings of up to <br />60 decibels, equivalent to normal human conversation. <br />Second, there would be no line -of -sight from these rooftop <br />units to the sensitive receptors. Because the sensitive uses <br />near the Project Site are one- to three -stories in height, there <br />would be no sound path from the mechanical equipment to <br />receptors that would be 20 to 45 feet lower than the roof of <br />the Project. Third, the presence of the Project's roof edge <br />creates an effective noise barrier that further reduces noise <br />levels from rooftop HVAC units by 8 dBA or more. A parapet <br />would further shield sensitive receptors near the Project Site. <br />These design elements would be helpful in managing noise. <br />For the townhomes, outdoor mechanical equipment for <br />heating and cooling for each residence would likely be <br />located on the ground level of each unit. This could include <br />a ground -mounted heat pump that would generate noise <br />during both heating and cooling sessions while air <br />conditioners operate during cooling cycles. This equipment <br />would include a number of sound sources, including <br />compressors, condenser fans, supply fans, return fans, and <br />exhaust fans. These units could be rated to generate a <br />sound power between 51 and 76 dBA. Any off -site sensitive <br />receptors would not experience elevated noise levels without <br />a direct line -of -sight to these units. Given their location near <br />each residence, any sound path from these units would be <br />attenuated by the presence of the townhomes and structures <br />in the Project, as well as the distance to off -site receptors <br />(i.e., Cabrillo Park to the north, Lake Dianne Apartments to <br />the northeast). As a result, noise from HVAC units would <br />negligibly elevate ambient noise levels, far less than the 5 <br />dBA CNEL threshold of significance for operational impacts. <br />Regarding potential impacts related to composite outdoor <br />uses, Exhibit 9F explains that the primary use of these <br />spaces would be for human conversation, which would <br />produce negligible noise increases. There are no amplified <br />noise sources proposed at the Project. Vocal intensity <br />increases about 0.38 dB for every 1.0 dB increase in noise <br />levels above 55 dB. For example, the sound of a human <br />voice at 60 dB would produce a noise level of 39 dB at ten <br />feet, which would not elevate ambient noise levels at any of <br />the analyzed sensitive receptors by more than 0.2 dBA Leq. <br />Moreover, noise levels from human speech would attenuate <br />rapidly with greater distance, resulting in a 33 dB noise level <br />at twenty feet, and 27 dB at 40 feet. Table 9 in Exhibit 9F <br />Resolution No. 2023-xx <br />f 24 <br />City Council 18 — 338 10/ 3 <br />