My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 18 - Appeal Application Nos. 2023-02 and 2023-03 for Cabrillo Town Center project
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2023
>
10/03/2023 Regular
>
Item 18 - Appeal Application Nos. 2023-02 and 2023-03 for Cabrillo Town Center project
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/3/2023 11:38:41 AM
Creation date
10/3/2023 9:16:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Item #
18
Date
10/3/2023
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1768
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4.8.2 Does the Project propose changes that would result in new significant impacts or <br />substantial increase in the severity of significant impacts that will require major revisions <br />of the Certified EIR? <br />As stated above, the topic of GHG Emissions impacts was not included in the 2007 CEQA <br />Guidelines but is included in the current version of the CEQA Guidelines. Since the approval of <br />the Certified EIR, international agreements, as well as federal and state laws and regulations, <br />have been adopted to reduce GHG emissions. However, both the existence of carbon dioxide <br />and other GHG emissions from fossil fuel combustion and other activities were known at the time <br />the Certified EIR was approved. Therefore, a GHG analysis is not required for the Project. <br />Nevertheless, a detailed analysis of the Project's GHG emissions impacts is included in <br />Attachment D of this document. As summarized below, the Project would not result in any <br />significant impacts related to GHG emissions. <br />Methodology <br />CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.4(a) assists lead agencies in determining the significance of the <br />impacts of GHG emissions, giving them discretion to determine whether to assess impacts <br />quantitatively or qualitatively. It calls for a good -faith effort to describe and calculate emissions. <br />This emissions inventory also demonstrates the reduction in a project's incremental contribution <br />of GHG emissions that results from regulations and requirements adopted as implementation <br />efforts for these plans for the reduction or mitigation of GHG emissions. As such, it provides further <br />justification that a project is consistent with plans adopted for the purpose of reducing and/or <br />mitigating GHG emissions by a project and over time. The significance of a project's GHG <br />emissions impacts is not based on the amount of GHG emissions resulting from that project. <br />The City, SCAQMD, Office of Planning and Research (OPR), CARB, California Air Pollution <br />Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), and other applicable agencies have not adopted a <br />numerical threshold of significance for assessing impacts related to GHG emissions. As a result, <br />the methodology for evaluating a project's impacts related to GHG emissions focuses on its <br />consistency with statewide, regional, and local plans adopted for the purpose of reducing and/or <br />mitigating GHG emissions. <br />The analysis also calculates the amount of GHG emissions from the Project using recommended <br />air quality models. The primary purpose of quantifying the Project's GHG emissions is to satisfy <br />CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.4(a). The estimated emissions inventory is also used to <br />determine if there would be a reduction in the Project's incremental contribution of GHG emissions <br />because of compliance with regulations requirements adopted to implement plans for reducing or <br />mitigating GHG emissions. However, the significance of the Project's GHG emissions is not based <br />on the amount of emissions from the Project as there is no adopted quantified threshold supported <br />by substantial evidence. <br />Attachment D of this document contains a detailed explanation of the methodology underlying <br />this analysis. <br />Cabrillo Town Center City of Santa Ana <br />Technical Memorandum August 2023 <br />City Council 18 — 542 10/3/2023 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.