Laserfiche WebLink
Our evaluation utilized the information collected from the excavations and laboratory test <br />results, along with utilizing the more recent studies as indicated in SP 117A by Bray and <br />Sancio, 2006 as a screening tool to determine if the encountered fine grained soils (clays) are <br />susceptible to liquefaction and analyzed as such. Our evaluation included performing grain <br />size distribution, Atterberg limit, and moisture content testing on representative fine-grained <br />layers (i.e. clayey/silty Sands) encountered within the geotechnical borings excavated on -site. <br />The laboratory test results indicated that the encountered fine-grained layers have a plasticity <br />index of 5, 7, 10 and 12, and moisture contents less than 85 percent of the liquid limit and is <br />considered as being susceptible to liquefaction. <br />The liquefaction analysis was performed using the LiquefyPro program with a user provided <br />factor of safety of 1.0. The liquefaction analysis was performed considering a minimum 5- <br />foot remedial removal and recompaction and the existing condition below with the highest <br />historic groundwater elevation at a depth of 40 feet below the ground surface. <br />The liquefaction analysis was performed using the following input data: <br />• Groundwater at a depth of 40 feet below the ground surface during seismic event, and <br />boring groundwater at elevations ranging 51.5 feet. <br />• A Peak Horizontal Ground Acceleration (PGAM) of 0.593g for a Design Earthquake <br />Magnitude of 7.71. <br />• Fines content as determined from laboratory testing during this investigation. <br />• The hammer used for determining blow -counts for both the ring and SPT sampling was <br />an auto -trip hammer with a 140 lb weight and a 30-inch drop. Therefore, based on the <br />type of hammer used, an energy correction factor (CE) of 1.3 is considered acceptable <br />for use in the analysis. <br />Based on our site evaluation, liquefaction analysis, and our professional opinion, there is a <br />potential for specific layers to liquefy between a depth of 44 to 51.5 feet below the existing <br />site grades. <br />During a strong seismic event, seismically induced settlement can occur within loose to <br />moderately dense, dry or saturated granular soil. Settlement caused by ground shaking is often <br />non -uniformly distributed, which can result in differential settlement. Based on blow counts <br />and in -situ densities, the native alluvial soils between a depth of 5 to 40 feet below the existing <br />ground surface are susceptible to seismically induced dry sand settlements and were evaluated <br />in our analysis. <br />Based on the results of the liquefaction/seismically induced settlement analysis, we estimated <br />the amount of total liquefaction -induced and dry sand settlement possible for the design <br />conditions is approximately 3-inches or less, and a differential settlement of approximately <br />1.5-inches. We estimated these settlements based on the procedures proposed by Tokimatsu <br />and Seed (1987). The graphical output of our liquefaction analysis which also shows the <br />graphical output of seismically induced saturated and dry sand settlement is included in <br />Appendix D. <br />Project i y ouncil 18 — 823 1 3 , 2021 <br />