Laserfiche WebLink
Federal Clean Air Act. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Massachusetts v. Environmental Protection <br />Agency, 127 S.Ct. 1438 (2007), that CO2 and other GHG emissions are pollutants under the federal <br />Clean Air Act (CAA), which the USEPA must regulate if it determines they pose an endangerment to <br />public health or welfare. The U.S. Supreme Court did not mandate that the USEPA enact regulations to <br />reduce GHG emissions. Instead, the Court found that the USEPA could avoid acting if it found that GHG <br />emissions do not contribute to climate change or if it offered a "reasonable explanation" for not <br />determining that GHG emissions contribute to climate change. <br />On April 17, 2009, the USEPA issued a proposed finding that GHG emissions contribute to air pollution <br />that may endanger public health or welfare. On April 24, 2009, the proposed rule was published in the <br />Federal Register under Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0171. The USEPA stated that high <br />atmospheric levels of GHG emissions "are the unambiguous result of human emissions and are very <br />likely the cause of the observed increase in average temperatures and other climatic changes." The <br />USEPA further found that "atmospheric concentrations of greenhouse gases endanger public health and <br />welfare within the meaning of Section 202 of the Clean Air Act." The findings were signed by the USEPA <br />Administrator on December 7, 2009. The final findings were published in the Federal Register on <br />December 15, 2009. The final rule was effective on January 14, 2010.23 While these findings alone do <br />not impose any requirements on industry or other entities, this action is a prerequisite to regulatory <br />actions by the USEPA, including, but not limited to, GHG emissions standards for light -duty vehicles. <br />On April 4, 2012, the USEPA published a proposed rule to establish, for the first time, a new source <br />performance standard for GHG emissions. Under the proposed rule, new fossil fuel —fired electric <br />generating units larger than 25 megawatts (MW) are required to limit emissions to 1,000 pounds of CO2 <br />per MW-hour (CO2/MWh) on an average annual basis, subject to certain exceptions. Subsequently, on <br />April 23, 2018, the USEPA issued a policy stating that CO2 emissions from biomass -fired and other <br />biogenic sources would be considered carbon neutral when used for energy production at stationary <br />sources. <br />Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) Standards. In response to the Massachusetts v. <br />Environmental Protection Agency ruling, the George W. Bush Administration issued Executive Order <br />13432 in 2007, directing the USEPA, the United States Department of Transportation (USDOT), and the <br />United States Department of Energy (USDOE) to establish regulations that reduce GHG emissions from <br />motor vehicles, non -road vehicles, and non -road engines by 2008. In 2009, the National Highway Traffic <br />Safety Administration (NHTSA) issued a final rule regulating fuel efficiency for and GHG emissions from <br />cars and light -duty trucks for model year 2011; in 2010, the USEPA and the NHTSA issued a final rule <br />regulating cars and light -duty trucks for model years 2012-2016. <br />In 2010, President Obama issued a memorandum directing the USEPA, USDOT, USDOE, and NHTSA <br />to establish additional standards regarding fuel efficiency and GHG emissions reduction, clean fuels, <br />and advanced vehicle infrastructure. In response to this directive, the USEPA and NHTSA proposed <br />23 USEPA, Endangerment and Cause or Contribute Findings for Greenhouse Gases Under Section 202(a) of <br />the Clean Air Act, Final Rule. <br />Cabrillo Town Center <br />Greenhouse. as ec <br />PAGE 8 <br />18 — 973 <br />City of Santa Ana <br />10/3/2023 July 2023 <br />