Item 35 - FY 2022 Emergency Management Performance Grant

Home Browse Search

HSGP Appendix | 2023 Page A-30 •Assist in preparation and revision of the state, regional, or local homeland security plan or the threat and hazard identification and risk assessment, as the case may be; and •Assist in determining effective funding priorities for SHSP grants. SAC Charter The governance of the SHSP and UASI programs through the SAC should be directed by a charter. All members of the SAC should sign and date the charter showing their agreement with its content and their representation on the Committee. Revisions to the governing charter must be sent to the recipient’s assigned FEMA HQ Preparedness Officer. The SAC charter must at a minimum address the following: •A detailed description of the SAC’s composition and an explanation of key governance processes, including how the SAC is informed by the state’s and urban area’s THIRA/SPR; •A description of the frequency at which the SAC will meet; •How the committee will leverage existing governance bodies; •A detailed description of how decisions on programmatic priorities funded by SHSP and UASI are made and how those decisions will be documented and shared with its members and other stakeholders, as appropriate; and •A description of defined roles and responsibilities for financial decision making and meeting administrative requirements. To ensure ongoing coordination efforts, SAAs are encouraged to share community preparedness information submitted in a state’s BSIR with members of the SAC. SAAs are also encouraged to share their THIRA/SPR data with members of the SAC who are applying for other FEMA preparedness grants to enhance their understanding of statewide capability gaps. The charter should be made available upon request to promote transparency in decision-making related to SHSP and UASI activities. To manage this effort and to further reinforce collaboration and coordination across the stakeholder community, a portion of the 20% holdback of a state or territory award may be utilized by the SAA to support the SAC and to ensure representation and active participation of SAC members. Funding may be used for hiring and training planners, establishing and maintaining a program management structure, identifying and managing projects, conducting research necessary to inform the planning process, and developing plans that bridge mechanisms, documents, protocols, and procedures. Urban Area Working Group (UAWG) UASI program implementation and governance must include regional partners and should have balanced representation among entities with operational responsibilities for prevention, protection, mitigation, and response activities within the region. In some instances, high-risk urban area boundaries cross state borders. States must ensure that the identified high-risk urban areas take an inclusive regional approach to the development and implementation of the UASI program and involve the contiguous jurisdictions, mutual aid partners, port authorities, rail and transit authorities, state agencies, Statewide Interoperability Coordinators, Citizen Corps Whole Community Council(s), and campus law enforcement in their program activities. UAWG Composition and Scope Pursuant to section 2003(b) of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (codified as amended at 6 U.S.C. § 604(b)), eligible high-risk urban areas were determined based on an analysis of relative risk of the 100 most populous Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs), as defined by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). MSAs are used by FEMA to determine eligibility for participation in the program.