Laserfiche WebLink
se 8:23-cv-00183-DOC-KES Document 25 Filed 05/09/23 Page 2 of 18 Page ID #:181 <br />1 TABLE OF CONTENTS <br />2 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES..............................................................................................2 <br />3 I. STATEMENT OF INTEREST OF THE UNITED STATES......................................4 <br />4 II. BACKGROUND..........................................................................................................4 <br />S111, ARGUMENT................................................................................................................ 7 <br />6 A. MW plausibly alleged that its distribution of food and drinks to homeless <br />7 individuals is "religious exercise" under RLUIPA......................................................... 7 <br />8 B. MW plausibly alleged that the City's complete refusal to allow it to provide food <br />9 or drinks to homeless individuals "imposes a substantial burden" on its religious <br />10 exercise under RLUIPA................................................................................................12 <br />11 IV. CONCLUSION..................................................................................................... ...15 <br />12 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE................................................................................17 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />1 <br />