Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Item 26 - Public Hearing Vista Heritage Charter School (601 North Fairview Street)
Planning and Building Agency www.santa-ana.org/planning-division/ Item # 26 City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701 Staff Report January 16, 2024 TOPIC: Vista Heritage Charter School (601 North Fairview Street) AGENDA TITLE Amendment Application No. 2023-04 and Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2023-03 for the expansion of Vista Heritage Charter School located at 601 North Fairview Street Published in the Orange County Reporter on January 5, 2024 and notices mailed on January 4, 2023. RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Approve first reading of an ordinance approving Amendment Application (Zone Change) No. 2023-04. ORDINANCE NO. NS-XXXX entitled AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA APPROVING AMENDMENT APPLICATION NO. 2023-04 AMENDING THE ZONING FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 601 NORTH FAIRVIEW STREET (APN: 405-241-04) FROM LIGHT INDUSTRIAL (M1) TO SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT NO. 82 (SD-82) 2. Adopt first reading of an ordinance approving Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA) No. 2023-03 as conditioned. ORDINANCE NO. NS-XXXX entitled ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. 2023-03 — AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AMENDING SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT NO. 82 (SD-82) TO EXPAND THE BOUNDARIES OF THE SD-82 AND TO AMEND VARIOUS SECTIONS OF THE SD-82 TO ALLOW FOR THE CREATION OF THREE (3) LAND USE ZONES, NEW PERMITTED USES AND ANCILLARY USES, AND ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS FOR PROPERTY MAINTENANCE, COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS (CC&RS) AND RECIPROCAL PARKING AND ACCESS AGREEMENTS 3. Determine that, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the CEQA Guidelines, the project is exempt from further review per Section 15301 Existing Facilities (Class 1 — Existing Facilities) of the CEQA Guidelines City Council 26 — 1 1/16/2024 Vista Heritage Charter School (601 North Fairview Street) January 16, 2024 Page 2 and per Section 15183 (Projects Consistent with a Community Plan, General Plan, or Zoning) of the CEQA Guidelines. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Collin Felch, representing Vista Heritage Charter Schools, is requesting approval of Amendment Application (Zone Change) No. 2023-04 and Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA) No. 2023-03 to rezone 601 North Fairview Street (APN: 405-241-04) and expand the boundaries of Specific Development No. 82 (SD-82) to accommodate the conversion of an existing 5,837-square-foot industrial building into an administrative office building for Vista Charter School. Approval of the amendment application will allow the change for the zoning of the subject property from Light Industrial (M1) to SD- 82. Furthermore, the zoning ordinance amendment will expand the boundaries of SD-82, and allow Administrative Offices as a permitted use on Parcel 4, and Outdoor Play Areas as a permitted use ancillary to schools on Parcel 2. Staff is recommending approval of the requests subject to conditions of approval that will address any potential negative impacts on the neighboring land uses. Moreover, staff is supporting the applicant's request because the project complies with the General Plan goals and policies and with the applicable zoning district's development standards. The proposed project seeks to preserve and improve the character and integrity of existing neighborhoods and districts through the promotion of a clean, safe, and creative environment. Planning Commission Action and Background At its regular meeting on December 11, 2023, the Planning Commission voted 6:0 (Commissioner Ramos absent) following a public hearing to recommend that the City Council adopt an ordinance approving Amendment Application No. 2023-04 and an ordinance approving Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2023-03. GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES: Yes DISCUSSION Project Description The amendment application will allow the rezoning of the subject property from M1 to SD-82 and help facilitate the conversion of a 5,837-square-foot industrial building into an administrative office that will serve Vista Heritage Charter School. Furthermore, the proposed administrative office will serve as headquarters for Vista Heritage Charter School that will oversee a total of six charter schools and it will employ a total of ten individuals that are currently employed at different Vista Heritage Charter Schools. The SD-82 boundaries would be expanded to include the subject property (601 N. Fairview Street or Parcel 4 as illustrated on Exhibit 9), which is approximately 39,437 square feet and located north of the existing SD-82 zoning district, and adjacent to Fairview Street and the Pacific Electric right-of-way (ROW). City Council 26 — 2 1/16/2024 Vista Heritage Charter School (601 North Fairview Street) January 16, 2024 Page 3 As part of the overall scope of work, the applicant also proposes various site improvements at the subject site on Parcel 4, including improved landscape in the parking lot; a fagade remodel to the existing 5,837-square-foot industrial building that is proposed to be converted into an office; construction of a new 2,297-square-foot garden; and new gates to enclose the garden. The new proposed garden will be located in the rear of the existing industrial building to be converted into an administrative office within a gated area and it will serve the Vista Heritage Charter School administrative office employees. Additionally, the building improvements for the converted office building will include fagade modifications to create new glass windows and doors; removal of the garage doors; and the creation of new offices, conference rooms, reception area, storage rooms, and an employee breakroom. Furthermore, the scope of work includes improvements at the Vista Heritage Charter School location (2501 W. Fifth Street or Parcel 2 as illustrated on Exhibit 9) for a new outdoor play area that totals 12,012 square feet and gates to enclose the play area. The existing indoor gym and office spaces will remain for indoor recreation and physical education for the students and administrative purposes, without any proposed changes. The outdoor play area will be located directly adjacent to Vista Heritage Charter School on the north side of the building and will serve as a play area for the school's students during the school's regular business hours. Lastly, the site improvements include a metal wire fence that will be installed by Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) along the north property line adjacent to the OC Street Car tracks. At this time, there is no additional square footage being proposed. All the proposed improvements will fall within the existing building. The current student enrollment is 840 students and there is no expansion of student enrollment or school capacity proposed as part of the project. Table 1: Project and Location Information Item Information Project Address and Council Ward 601 North Fairview Street — Ward 5 Nearest Intersection Fairview Street and Fifth Street General Plan Designation Industrial/Flex-Medium (Flex-1.5) Existing Zoning Designation Light Industrial (Ml) Proposed Zoning Designation Specific Development No. 82 (SD-82) Surrounding Land Uses North Pacific Electric Right -of -Way (ROW)/OCT Streetcar and School District Offices East Pacific Electric Right -of -Way (ROW)/OCTA Streetcar South Vista Heritage Charter School and Industrial Businesses West Lydia Romero -Cruz Academy Property Size 0.905 Acres (39,437 square feet) Existing Site Development The subject site contains a one-story, 5,837-square-foot building. Existing Site Uses Auto repair uses to be converted into administrative uses. Tenant Size 5,837 square feet Use Permissions Amendment to allow Administrative Offices as a permitted use on Parcel 4, and Outdoor Play Areas as a permitted use City Council 26 — 3 1/16/2024 Vista Heritage Charter School (601 North Fairview Street) January 16, 2024 Page 4 ancillary to schools on Parcel 2, within the SD-82 and subject tooperational standards. Zoning Code Sections Affected Uses SAMC Section 41-593 and SD-82 Operational Standards SAMC Section 41-593 and SD-82 Table 2: Development Standards Standard Required by SAMC and SD-82 Provided Permitted Uses Administrative Offices on Parcel Complies: The administrative office 4; and Outdoor Play Areas as a building is 5,837 square feet is permitted use ancillary to located on Parcel 4, and the Outdoor schools on Parcel 2 Play Area is located on Parcel 2. Walls and Screening Roof equipment shall be Complies: New roof mounted screened. mechanical equipment will be screened with a parapet wall. Additionally, the line -of -sight illustrates that the equipment will not be visible to pedestrians in the new vicinity. Landscaping 10-foot wide landscape area is Complies: the site plan illustrates a required along north property 10-foot wide landscape area along line and landscaped planter shall the north property line and landscape meet the commercial landscape planters that comply with commercial standards landscape standards. Parking Per previous entitlements, the Complies: The site plan illustrates 293 site must contain a minimum of parking spaces. 287 parking spaces. Floor Area Ratio FAR 1.5 maximum Complies: 0.14 FAR Project Background On October 6, 2008, the City Council approved several entitlements for the Civic Center Business Park located at the northeast corner of Fifth Street and Fairview Street, including Amendment Application No. 2008-06 (Ordinance No. NS-2777). The amendment application allowed for a zone change of the business park site from M1 to SD-82. The request was initiated by the Templo Calvario Assembly of God Church, which at the time was proposing to expand their worship facilities by constructing a larger sanctuary at 2501 West Fifth Street. However, the specific development still allowed for the retention of the existing office, retail, and industrial uses operating in the business park, by allowing all uses within the Light Industrial (M1) zoning district. Subsequently, on January 21, 2020, the City Council approved additional entitlements affecting the business park, including ZOA No. 2019-01 (Ordinance No. NS-2983), to allow school uses by right. City Council 26 — 4 1/16/2024 Vista Heritage Charter School (601 North Fairview Street) January 16, 2024 Page 5 Prior to the approval of ZOA No. 2019-01, school uses had been in operation at the business park. Specifically, Templo Calvario operated a preschool and kindergarten at 2609 West Fifth Street since the 1990s. In 2003, the Edward B. Cole Senior Academy occupied the site until it relocated to another Santa Ana location in 2010. From 2011 to 2015, Templo Calvario once again operated a school at this location. In 2015, Vista Heritage Charter School took over operations at the site. In 2019, Vista Heritage Charter School expanded their 6-8t" grade operation located at 2609 W. Fifth Street to include kindergarten through 5t" grades within two adjacent suites, pursuant to approval of ZOA No. 2019-01, which also allowed an increase in student enrollment and school operations. Currently, Vista Heritage Charter School occupies approximately 66,000 square feet of building space and accommodates a maximum of 870 students, at 2601 through 2617 West Fifth Street. Project Analysis The proposed project aims to achieve two primary objectives. First, the zoning ordinance amendment is seeking to expand the boundaries of SD-82 and allow an Administrative Office use on Parcel 4, and an Outdoor Play Areas on Parcel 2, as an ancillary use to the Vista Heritage Charter School. Second, the amendment application intends to amend the zoning map by rezoning the subject property from M1 to SD-82. The following sections of this report provides analysis for the proposed action item and the basis for staff's recommendation of approval for the project. Zoning Ordinance Amendment Pursuant to SAMC Section 41-593.1, the purpose and intent of a specific development (SD) designation is to provide a tailored and flexible zoning approach to address specific and exceptional circumstances associated with certain parcels, while protecting and promoting the public health, safety, and general welfare of the City and its residents. These circumstances may include unique characteristics, historical significance, or specific community needs that deviate from the standard zoning regulations. Moreover, SD designations protect and enhance the value of properties by encouraging the use of good design principles and concepts; encouraging, securing, and maintaining the orderly and harmonious appearance, attractiveness, and aesthetic development; providing a method whereby specific development plans are based on the general plan; and by recognizing the interdependence of land values and aesthetics and providing a method to implement interdependence. For this specific proposal, the applicant is proposing to amend the SD-82 document to allow Administrative Offices as a permitted use on Parcel 4 and Outdoor Play Areas on Parcel 2, ancillary to the existing school. In response to this application, staff is proposing that SD-82 be revised pursuant to Table 3 below: Table 3: Permitted Uses and Operational Standards for SD-82 REQUIREMENT ISSUE AND PROPOSED AMENDMENT STANDARDS: I Issue: City Council 26 — 5 1/16/2024 Vista Heritage Charter School (601 North Fairview Street) January 16, 2024 Page 6 School traffic may conflict with local traffic patterns and adjacent uses. In Circulation and Parking primarily industrial districts, like SD-82, the impacts could be particularly Management Plan severe. Proposed Amendment: The school prepared a Circulation and Parking Management Plan ("Plan") that was reviewed as part of the Development Project Review (DP) that was submitted in February of 2023. The Plan takes into account the parking, onsite circulation, drop off, and pick up. The Plan identifies how the school buses will pick-up and drop-off students within the front parking lot. The Plan is designed to accommodate the existing school population and to ensure that there is no vehicle queuing off -site or conflicts with the adjacent industrial buildings to the north and west of the site. Future modifications to the Plan may require a traffic analysis to demonstrate compliance. Lastly, at this time, the project does not propose an increase in student enrollment or additional square footage. Physical Education Issue: Activity Area Standards Noise resulting from physical education or after -school sports activities can impact adjacent residents or tenants. Proposed Amendment: Physical education activity areas shall be designed so that their use does not disturb the commercial or industrial uses during regular business hours and residential uses between the hours of 8 p.m. and 7 a.m. As proposed, the physical education activities will be relocated to a designated gated area located directly adjacent to the existing school. In addition, the school's regular hours are Monday through Friday from 8:30 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. Outdoor activities will not take place outside of the school's regular hours. Furthermore, the noise sources are typically intermittent and short in duration. Additionally, the impact of noise diminishes significantly with distance from its origin. The sensitive receptors (residential zones and land uses) are situated approximately 200 feet away. Therefore, the proposed Outdoor Play Area's generated noise would not adversely affect these sensitive receptors. Administrative Offices Issue: The administrative office may increase parking demand and traffic generation of the entire site. Proposed Amendment: The proposed change of use is not expected to impact the parking demand on -site due to specific parking requirements. The administrative office requires three (3) parking spaces per 1,000 square feet; whereas, the auto -repair businesses required five (5) parking spaces per 1,000 square feet. Additionally, the administrative office will only be employing a total of ten (10) individuals and the total increase in trip generation during peak hours is not significant enough to trigger concerns. Maximum Student Issue: Enrollment Number of students can dictate the level of impact on adjacent uses. More students mean more cars or buses picking up or dropping off students, more children on the playground, and more noise. City Council 26 — 6 1/16/2024 Vista Heritage Charter School (601 North Fairview Street) January 16, 2024 Page 7 Proposed Amendment: The proposed number of students will not increase. The number of student enrollment will remain at a maximum of 870 students. This enrollment cap will remain in the SD document. Industrial Uses Issue: The current list of permitted uses in SD-82 contains various industrial uses, which are no longer consistent with the General Plan land use designation and the designated focus area. The Flex-1.5 land use designation encourages industrial uses that do not produce significant air pollutants including office -industrial flex spaces, small-scale clean manufacturing, research and development, among other uses. Moreover, the focus area is intended to transition a group of auto -oriented neighborhoods and institutions into a series of transit -oriented neighborhoods that support and benefit from future streetcar stops. Proposed Amendment: The proposed amendment will update the list of permissible uses per zone to establish consistency with the Flex-1.5 General Plan land use designation and the focus area. Amendment Application Currently, the site to the south of 601 N. Fairview Street is zoned SD-82, and the proposed rezoning intends to align the subject site with the existing development to the south. Within the SD-82 regulations, permissible uses encompass industrial, school, and church uses. Expanding the SD-82 boundaries will accommodate additional administrative office use at 601 N. Fairview Street. This zoning adjustment aims to repurpose the existing industrial building, historically serving as an auto -repair business, into an administrative office space. Under the current M1 zoning, only up to 30% of the gross floor area can be allocated for administrative office use. The proposed rezoning, coupled with amendments to the SD- 82 regulations, seeks to enable the existing building's operation as an administrative office without constraint, limited to Parcel 4. More importantly, the rezoning is not anticipated to exacerbate traffic flow, parking demands, or noise impacts. As detailed in Table 3, the proposed rezoning is projected to address and mitigate any potential adverse effects on the surrounding community. General Plan Consistency The proposed zoning amendment advances the vision for the subject site's General Plan Focus Area and will bring the site into alignment and compliance with the General Plan through reducing and eliminating traditional heavy industrial and noxious uses currently allowable on the properties. The property is located in the West Santa Ana Boulevard Focus Area and is designated as Industrial/Flex-Low (Flex-1.5). This Focus Area envisions a mixed -use corridor with a goal of transitioning out existing auto - City Council 26 — 7 1/16/2024 Vista Heritage Charter School (601 North Fairview Street) January 16, 2024 Page 8 oriented and traditional industrial uses to clean manufacturing and research and development uses, and live -work maker spaces that are compatible and can coexist with residential and other sensitive land uses such as schools, churches, and recreation facilities. In addition, the approval of the subject project will be consistent with the General Plan land use designation and the designated focus area. The Flex-1.5 land use designation encourages a myriad of industrial uses that do not produce significant air pollutants including office -industrial flex spaces, small-scale clean manufacturing, research and development, among other uses. Furthermore, the West Santa Ana Boulevard Focus Area is intended to transition a group of auto -oriented neighborhoods and institutions into a series of transit -oriented neighborhoods that support and benefit from future streetcar stops. In order to accomplish the goals of the General Plan, the focus area promotes infill development while respecting established neighborhoods and providing buffers from industrial to residential neighborhoods. The proposed project will create a buffer from industrial uses to residential by changing the use of an auto -repair building into an office space. Additionally, the proposed project proposes landscape improvements and a community garden that will further act as buffers and accomplish the goals of the General Plan. Moreover, the approval of the proposed applications will be consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan, specifically Goals 1, 2, and 3 of the Land Use Element (LU). Goal 1 of the LU provides a land use plan that improves the quality of life and respects the existing community. Policy 1-8 encourages new development to provide a new community benefit. The change of use from auto -repair to office will provide a benefit to the community by reducing the noise, fumes, and waste that stem from auto - repair -like businesses. Additionally, the outdoor play area for the school will allow the school to offer their students a space for recreational purposed within their business hours. Goal 2 of the LU seeks a balance of land uses to meet Santa Ana's diverse needs. Policy 2-6 promotes rehabilitation of properties and encourages increased levels of capital investment to create a safe and attractive environment. Approval of the amendment application and the zoning ordinance amendment will promote the rehabilitation of the existing building with a new fagade and site improvements. Goal 3 of the LU seeks to preserve and improve the character and integrity of existing neighborhoods and districts. Policy 3-7 promotes a clean, safe, and creative environment for Santa Ana's residential, workers, and visitors. Approval of the project will promote a clean, safe, and creative environment for Santa Ana's residents by reducing hazardous waste produced by auto repair businesses, enhancing the architecture of the existing building, and enhancing the site by introducing new landscape. City Council 26 — 8 1/16/2024 Vista Heritage Charter School (601 North Fairview Street) January 16, 2024 Page 9 Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions During the development review phase of the project, the City obtained information concerning the Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) governing both Parcel 2 and Parcel 4 illustrated in Exhibit 9. These CC&Rs outline potential use restrictions that could impact these parcels. However, these stipulations do not hinder the City's authority to proceed with the intended rezoning and revising of the SD-82 text. Furthermore, the text of SD-82 requires the update and clarification of these CC&Rs, mandating their refinement and subsequent submission to the City before permit issuance. Public Notification and Community Outreach Project notifications were posted, published, and mailed in accordance with City and State regulations for both the Planning Commission and the City Council public hearing. At the time this report was printed, no issues of concern were raised regarding the proposed development. In addition to the above noticing, the project was subject to the City's Sunshine Ordinance (Ordinance No. NS-3040) requiring two meetings to facilitate early public participation. The first community meeting was held March 6, 2023. Eleven members of the community attended and posted questions relating to on -site traffic circulation, the outdoor play area, the location of the proposed fences, and parking concerns. The second community meeting was held May 15, 2023, during which 10 members of the community attended and expressed that the site plan did not address the traffic circulation concerns raised previously. Materials from the two required community meetings are included with this report as Exhibit 8, and all materials were published to the project's webpage on the City's website at santa-ana.org/vista-charter-school/. Additional Outreach The applicant organized an additional meeting on May 23, 2023, with stakeholders, City staff, and Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) staff to discuss the parking requirements of Parcel 2 and Parcel 4 listed in the CC&Rs and optional overflow parking not listed in the CC&Rs for Templo Calvario. Moreover, on November 3 and November 15, the applicant met with various stakeholders to discuss the proposed site plan, parking requirements, and clarification on the CC&Rs limitations. The purpose of the meetings was to ensure ongoing communication about the steps and substance needed in order to revise the CC&Rs to reflect the current project, should the requested entitlements be approved. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the CEQA Guidelines, the project is exempt from further review per Section 15301 Existing Facilities (Class 1 — Existing Facilities) of the CEQA Guidelines and per Section 15183 (Projects Consistent with a Community Plan, General Plan, or Zoning) of the CEQA Guidelines. City Council 26 — 9 1/16/2024 Vista Heritage Charter School (601 North Fairview Street) January 16, 2024 Page 10 Class 1 exemption applies to the operation, repair, maintenance, permitting, leasing, licensing, or minor alteration of existing public or private structures, facilities, mechanical equipment, or topographical features, involving negligible or no expansion of existing or former use as determined by the lead agency. The subject project is proposing the change of use of an existing industrial building that was previously used for an auto repair business to be used for administrative office purposes. Additionally, the project is exempt from further review per Section 15183 (Projects Consistent with a Community Plan, General Plan, or Zoning) of the CEQA Guidelines. The environmental review contained in Exhibit 7 has been prepared, and peer reviewed by a qualified CEQA consultant hired by the City, to assess the potential for the proposed project to result in environmental effects and whether the proposed project qualified for an exemption under Section 15183 of the CEQA Guidelines. Moreover, the analysis evaluated whether the potential environmental impacts are addressed in the City of Santa Ana General Plan Update Final Recirculated Program Environmental Impact Report (GPU EIR). Specifically, the analysis evaluates the change of use of the existing 5,837-square-foot building from auto -repair to administrative office and site improvements that include new landscaping, fagade remodel, and new outdoor areas for the office and the school. CEQA Guidelines Section 15183 allows a streamlined environmental review process for projects that are consistent with the densities established by existing zoning, community plan, or general plan policies for which an EIR was certified and does not require additional environmental review, except as might be necessary to examine whether there are project -specific significant effects which are peculiar to the project or its site. Moreover, projects that are consistent with the densities and use characteristics considered by the GPU EIR may qualify for the CEQA Guidelines Section 15183 Exemption process. This exemption process may be used when a project meets the following conditions: a) The project is consistent with the development density established by existing zoning, community plan, or general plan policies for which an EIR was certified. b) There are no project specific effects which are peculiar to the project or its site. c) There are no project specific impacts which the prior EIR failed to analyze as significant effects. d) There are no potentially significant off -site and/or cumulative impacts which the prior EIR failed to evaluate. e) There is no substantial new information which results in more severe impacts than anticipated by the prior EIR. The GPU was adopted, and the GPU EIR certified, in April 2022 (State Clearinghouse Number 2020029087); the GPU went into effect on May 26, 2022. Any decision by the City affecting land use and development must be consistent with the GPU. The GPU EIR evaluates the potential environmental effects associated with implementation of the GPU and addresses appropriate and feasible mitigation measures that would minimize City Council 26 — 10 1/16/2024 Vista Heritage Charter School (601 North Fairview Street) January 16, 2024 Page 11 or eliminate these impacts. Pursuant to Section 15183(i)(2) of the CEQA Guidelines, a project is consistent with the GPU if the development density does not exceed what was contemplated and analyzed for the parcel(s) in the certified GPU EIR and complies with the associated standards applicable to that development density. Development density standards can include the number of dwelling units per acre, the number of people in a given area, floor area ratio (FAR), and other measures of building intensity, building height, size limitations, and use restrictions. The GPU identifies that the Interim Development Standard for the FLEX-1.5 area are those development standards outlined for the M1 zoning designation. The M1 zone provides for a variety of light industrial uses, including warehousing, manufacture, assembly, machine shops, wholesale businesses, and ancillary uses such as office uses that do not exceed thirty (30) percent of the gross floor area. The Project would result in a FAR of 0.14, which is within the projections of the GPU EIR, which evaluated a density of 1.5 FAR on the site. The GPU EIR adequately anticipated and analyzed the impacts of this Project, identified applicable mitigation measures necessary to reduce impacts of the Project, and the Project implements the applicable mitigation measures. The Project, therefore, qualifies for an exemption from additional environmental review as set forth in State CEQA Guidelines Section 15183. The full exemption analysis is provided as Exhibit 7 of this report. Based on this analysis, a Notice of Exemption, Environmental Review No. 2023-40 will be filed for this project. ECONOMIC AND FISCAL IMPACTS To date, the proposed project has generated a total of 156 temporary employment opportunities, including environmental engineers, environmental remediation technicians, demolition crew, architects, engineers, development consultants, and an attorney. Additionally, the new administrative office will create ten permanent employment positions. Moreover, the applicant will pay approximately $46,235 in entitlement, plan check, and permit fees. There is no fiscal impact associated with this action. EXHIBIT(S) 1. Amendment Application Ordinance 2. Zoning Ordinance Amendment Ordinance 3. Vicinity Zoning and Aerial Map 4. Site Photo 5. Full Project Plans 6. Renderings 7. Environmental Analysis and Exemption 8. Community Meetings Documents 9. Parcel Map in Recording No. 86-284222 10. Planning Commission Agenda Packet with Public Comments City Council 26 —11 1/16/2024 Vista Heritage Charter School (601 North Fairview Street) January 16, 2024 Page 12 Submitted By: Minh Thai, Executive Director of the Planning and Building Agency Approved By: Tom Hatch, Interim City Manager City Council 26 — 12 1/16/2024 ORDINANCE NO. NS-XXXX AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA APPROVING AMENDMENT APPLICATION NO. 2023-04 AMENDING THE ZONING FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 601 NORTH FAIRVIEW STREET (APN: 405-241-04) FROM LIGHT INDUSTRIAL (M1) TO SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT NO. 82 (SD-82) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby finds, determines and declares as follows: A. Red Hook Capital Partners, LLC with Vista Heritage Charter Schools ("Applicant") representing 2609 W. 5th Street LLC (Property Owner) is requesting approval of Amendment Application (AA) No. 2023-04 to change the zoning designation of the property located at 601 North Fairview Street (APN: 405-241-04) from Light Industrial (M1) to Specific Development No. 82 (SD-82) in order to facilitate the change of use of an existing auto -repair business to an administrative office. B. Chapter 41, Article I, Division 1, Section 41-1 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code establishes that because of the necessity of segregating the location of residences, businesses, trades and industries; regulating the use of buildings, structures, and land; and regulating the location, height, bulk and size of buildings and structures, the size of yards and open spaces, the City is divided into land -use districts of such number, shape and area as may be considered best suited to carry out these regulations and provide for their enforcement. The regulations are considered necessary in order to: encourage the most appropriate use of land, conserve and stabilize property value, provide adequate open spaces for light and air and to prevent and fight fires, prevent undue concentration of population, lessen congestion on streets and highways, and promote the health, safety and general welfare of the people, all as part of the general plan of the City. The City of Santa Ana has adopted a zoning map which has since been amended from time to time. C. On April 19, 2022, the City adopted the General Plan Update and it went into effect on May 26, 2022. The approval of the subject project is consistent with the Industrial/Flex-Low (Flex-1.5) General Plan land use designation and the designated West Santa Ana Boulevard Focus Area. The Flex-1.5 land use designation encourage a myriad of industrial uses that do not produce significant air pollutants including office -industrial flex spaces, small-scale clean manufacturing, among other uses. The proposed zoning amendment advances the vision for the subject site's General Plan Focus Ordinance No. NS-XXXX City Council 26 — 13 1/16/ of 7 Area and will bring the site into alignment and compliance with the General Plan through reducing and eliminating traditional heavy industrial and noxious uses currently allowable on the properties. Furthermore, the West Santa Ana Boulevard Focus Area envisions a mixed -use corridor with a goal of transitioning out existing auto -oriented and traditional industrial uses to clean manufacturing and research and development uses, and live -work maker spaces that are compatible and can coexist with residential and other sensitive land uses such as schools, churches, and recreation facilities. In addition, the focus area would transition the auto -oriented neighborhoods and institutions into a series of transit -oriented neighborhoods that support and benefit from future streetcar stops. In order to accomplish the goals of the General Plan, the focus area promotes infill development while respecting established neighborhoods and providing buffers from industrial to residential neighborhoods. The proposed project will create a buffer from industrial uses to residential by changing the use of an auto -repair building into an office space. Additionally, the proposed project proposes landscape improvements and a community garden that will further act as buffers and accomplish the goals of the General Plan. D. The entire Project as currently proposed entails, among other things, (1) Approval of Amendment Application No. 2023-07 to change the site's zoning designation from Light Industrial (M1) to Specific Development No. 82 (SD-82) and (2) approval of Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2023-03 to expand the boundaries of SD-82 and to allow for Administrative Offices as a permitted use on Parcel 4, and an Outdoor Play Area in Parcel 2 ancillary to the Vista Heritage Charter School. E. The Applicant has demonstrated compliance with all requirements of the Sunshine Ordinance codified at Santa Ana Municipal Code Section 2-153, including public notification and hosting of required community meetings. Materials resulting from the meetings were subsequently posted to the City's webpage for the project. F. On December 11, 2023, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing and voted to recommend that the City Council adopt an ordinance approving Amendment Application No. 2023-04. G. On January 16, 2024, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing and voted to recommend that the City Council adopt an ordinance approving Amendment Application No. 2023-04. H. For the reasons contained herein, and each of them, Amendment Application No. 2023-04 is hereby found and determined to be consistent with the intent and purpose of Chapter 41 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code; thus, changing the zoning district is found to be consistent with the General Plan of the City of Santa Ana and otherwise justified by the public necessity, convenience, and general welfare. Ordinance No. NS-XXXX City Council 26 — 14 1/16/ of 7 Section 2. The Amendment Application consists of amendments to the Zoning Map, as shown in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Section 3. The City Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in the analysis performed pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Environmental Review No. 2023-40). In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the CEQA Guidelines, the project is categorically exempt from further review per Section 15301 (Class 1 — Existing Facilities) of the CEQA Guidelines. Class 1 exemption applies to the operation, repair maintenance, permitting, leasing, licensing, or minor alteration of existing public or private structures, facilities, mechanical equipment, or topographical features, involving negligible or no expansion of existing or former use. The subject project is proposing the change of use of an existing industrial building that was previously used for an auto repair business to be used for administrative office purposes. Additionally, the project is exempt from further review pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21083.3 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15183, the Project is exempt from further review. This type of exemption analysis evaluates whether the potential environmental impacts of the proposed change of use for the existing 5,837-square-foot building from auto -repair to administrative office and site improvements that include new landscape, fagade remodel, and new outdoor areas for the office and the school are addressed in the City of Santa Ana General Plan Update Final Recirculated Program Environmental Impact Report (GPU EIR). A rezoning that is consistent with an adopted general plan falls within this exemption. (A) As set forth in CEQA Guidelines Section 15183(a), projects that are "consistent with the development density established by the existing zoning, community plan or general plan policies for which an EIR was certified shall not require additional environmental review, except as might be necessary to examine whether there are project -specific significant effects which are peculiar to the project or its site." The CEQA Guidelines further state that "[i]f an impact is not peculiar to the parcel or to the project, has been addressed as a significant effect in the prior EIR, or can be substantially mitigated by the imposition of uniformly applied development policies or standards ... then an additional EIR need not be prepared for the project solely on the basis of that impact." CEQA Guidelines Section 15183(c). (B) The GPU was adopted, and the GPU EIR certified, in April 2022 (State Clearinghouse Number 2020029087); the GPU went into effect on May 26, 2022. Any decision by the City affecting land use and development must be consistent with the GPU. The GPU EIR evaluates the potential environmental effects associated with implementation of the GPU and addresses appropriate and feasible mitigation measures that would minimize or eliminate these impacts. A project is consistent with the GPU if its development density is the same or less than the standard expressed for the involved parcel in the general plan for which an EIR has been certified, and the project complies with the density -related standards contained in that plan. CEQA Guidelines section 15183(i)(2). Development density standards can include the number of dwelling units per acre, the number of people in a given area, floor area ratio (FAR), and other measures of building intensity, building height, size limitations, and use restrictions. Ordinance No. NS-XXXX City Council 26 — 15 1/16/ of 7 (C) The GPU identifies that the Interim Development Standard for the FLEX-1.5 area is M1. The M1 zone provides for a variety of light industrial uses, including warehousing, manufacture, assembly, machine shops, wholesale businesses and ancillary uses such as office uses that do not exceed thirty (30) percent of the gross floor area. The Project would result in a FAR of 0.14, which is within the projections of the GPU EIR, which evaluated a density of 1.5 FAR on the site. The GPU EIR adequately anticipated and analyzed the impacts of this Project and identified applicable mitigation measures necessary to reduce impacts of the Project, and the Project implements the applicable mitigation measures. (D) Specifically, the Project qualifies for the exemption because the following findings can be made: The Project is consistent with the development density established by existing zoning, community plan or general plan policies for which an EIR was certified. The Project would result in a FAR of 0.14, which is less than the maximum FAR of 1.5 allowable in the FLEX-1.5 designated area, which is the development density established by the GPU and analyzed in the GPU EIR. The Project site has an Interim Development Standard of M-1 (light Industrial zone). The M-1 zone does not have density requirements. 2. There are no Project specific effects which are peculiar to the Project or its site, and which the GPU EIR failed to analyze as significant effects. The subject property is similar to other properties in the area, including its land use designation and zoning. The property does not support any peculiar environmental features, and the Project would not result in any peculiar effects. In addition, as explained further in the prepared Exemption Checklist, project impacts were adequately analyzed by the GPU EIR; and as detailed in the GPU EIR, development projects pursuant to the GPU, such as the proposed Project, could result in potentially significant impacts to air quality, greenhouse gas emissions, and noise. However, applicable mitigation measures specified within the GPU EIR would reduce potential impacts to a less than significant level. 3. There are no potentially significant off -site and/or cumulative impacts which the GPU EIR failed to evaluate. The Project is consistent with the density and use characteristics of the development considered by the GPU EIR and would represent a small part of the growth that was forecast for build -out of the GPU. The GPU EIR considered the incremental impacts of the Project, and as explained further in the prepared Exemption Checklist, no potentially significant off -site or cumulative impacts have been identified which were not previously evaluated. 4. There is no substantial new information which results in more severe impacts than anticipated by the GPU EIR. As explained in the prepared Exemption Checklist, no new information has been identified which would result in a determination of a more severe impact than what had been anticipated by the GPU EIR. 5. As explained in the prepared Exemption Checklist, the Project will undertake feasible mitigation measures specified in the GPU EIR. These GPU EIR mitigation Ordinance No. NS-XXXX City Council 26 — 16 1/16/ 4 of 7 measures will be undertaken through Project design, compliance with regulations and ordinances, and through the Project's conditions of approval. (E) The Project therefore qualifies for an exemption from additional environmental review as set forth in Public Resources Code section 21083.3 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15183. The full exemption analysis is provided in Exhibit 7 of the staff report accompanying this Ordinance. Based on this analysis, a Notice of Exemption, Environmental Review No. 2023-40 will be filed for this project. Section 4. An amended Sectional District Map, showing the above described changes in use district designation, is hereby approved and attached hereto as Exhibit A, and incorporated by this reference as though fully set forth herein. Section 5. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana, after conducting the public hearing, hereby approves Amendment Application No. 2023-04. This decision is based upon the evidence submitted at the above said hearing, which includes, but is not limited to: the Request for Planning Commission Action dated December 11, 2023 and exhibits attached hereto; and the public testimony, written and oral, all of which are incorporated herein by this reference. Section 6. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby declares that it would have adopted this ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions be declared invalid or unconstitutional. Section 7. This Ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days after its adoption. Section 8. The Clerk of the Council shall certify the adoption of this ordinance and shall cause the same to be published as required by law. [Signatures on the following page] Ordinance No. NS-XXXX City Council 26 — 17 1/16/ of ADOPTED this day of , 2024. Valerie Amezcua Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: Sonia R. Carvalho City Attorney By: el. J se Montoya Assistant City Attorney AYES: Councilmembers NOES: Councilmembers ABSTAIN: Councilmembers NOT PRESENT: Councilmembers Ordinance No. NS-XXXX City Council 26 — 18 1/16/ of 7 CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY I, Jennifer L. Hall, City Clerk, do hereby attest to and certify the attached Ordinance No. NS- XXXX to be the original ordinance adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on , 2024 and that said ordinance was published in accordance with the Charter of the City of Santa Ana. Date: City Clerk City of Santa Ana Ordinance No. NS-XXXX City Council 26 — 19 1/1 67mlof 7 ORDINANCE NO. NS-XXXX ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. 2023-03 — AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AMENDING SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT NO. 82 (SD-82) TO EXPAND THE BOUNDARIES OF THE SD-82 AND TO AMEND VARIOUS SECTIONS OF THE SD-82 TO ALLOW FOR THE CREATION OF THREE (3) LAND USE ZONES, NEW PERMITTED USES AND ANCILLARY USES, AND ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS FOR PROPERTY MAINTENANCE, COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS (CC&RS) AND RECIPROCAL PARKING AND ACCESS AGREEMENTS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby finds, determines and declares as follows: A. On October 20, 2008, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. NS-2777, rezoning the property located at 2501 West Fifth Street, described as Parcels 1 and 2 of Parcel Map No. 84-886, as shown on a map filed in Book 198, Pages 19-20 of Parcels Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of Orange County, California, from Light Industrial (M-1) to Specific Development Plan No. 82 (SD-82). B. On January 21, 2020, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. NS-2983, to amend the Santa Ana Municipal Code (SAMC) to include a definition of "schools"; allow schools as a permitted use in SD-82; to adopt a set of operational standards for schools within SD-82; allow Vista Heritage Charter School to expand to 66,000 square feet in size; and allow Vista Heritage Charter School to expand the student enrollment to 870 students. C. The proposed Project would only affect Parcel 1, 2, and 4, of Parcel Map No. 84-886, as shown on a Map filed in Book 198, Pages 19-20 of Parcel Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of Orange County, California. D. The proposed Project entails, among other things, (1) Approval of Amendment Application No. 2023-04 to change the zoning designation for the property located at 601 North Fairview Street (APN: 405-241-04) from Light Industrial (M1) to Specific Development No. 82 (SD-82); and (2) approval of Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2023-03 to expand the boundaries of SD-82 and to allow for Administrative Offices, Surface Parking, and Private Outdoor Community Areas as a permitted use on Parcel 4, and Outdoor Play Area on Parcel 2, ancillary to the Vista Heritage Charter School. Parcel 2 and 4 are as shown on Parcel Map No. 84-886, as Ordinance No. NS-XXXX City Council 26 — 21 1714 6 shown on a Map filed in Book 198, Pages 19-20 of Parcel Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of Orange County, California. E. The approval of the text amendments, permissible uses, and development standards are consistent with the General Plan land use designation of Industrial/Flex-1.5 (Flex 1.5) and the designated West Santa Ana Boulevard Focus Area. On April 19, 2022, the City adopted the General Plan Update which went into effect on May 26, 2022. The Flex-1.5 land use designation encourages industrial uses that do not produce significant air pollutants including office -industrial flex spaces, small-scale clean manufacturing, among other uses. The proposed zoning amendment advances the vision for the subject site's General Plan Focus Area and will bring the site into alignment and compliance with the General Plan through reducing and eliminating traditional heavy industrial and noxious uses currently allowable on the properties. Furthermore, the West Santa Ana Boulevard Focus Area envisions a mixed -use corridor with a goal of transitioning out existing auto - oriented and traditional industrial uses to clean manufacturing and research and development uses, and live -work maker spaces that are compatible and can coexist with residential and other sensitive land uses such as schools, churches, and recreation facilities. In addition, the focus area would transition a group of auto -oriented neighborhoods and institutions into a series of transit -oriented neighborhoods that support and benefit from future streetcar stops. In order to accomplish the goals of the General Plan, the focus area promotes infill development while respecting established neighborhoods and providing buffers from industrial to residential neighborhoods. The proposed project will create a buffer from industrial uses to residential by changing the use of an auto -repair building into an office space. Additionally, the proposed project proposes landscape improvements and a community garden that will further act as buffers and accomplish the goals of the General Plan. F. The applicant has demonstrated compliance with all requirements of the Sunshine Ordinance codified at SAMC Section 2-153, including public notification and hosting of required community meetings. Materials resulting from the meetings were subsequently posted to the City's webpage for the project. G. On December 11, 2023, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing and voted to recommend that the City Council adopt an ordinance approving Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2023-03. H. On January 16, 2024, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing and voted to recommend that the City Council adopt an ordinance approving Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2023-03. For the reasons contained herein, and each of them, Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2023-3 is hereby found and determined to be consistent with the intent and purpose of Chapter 41 of the SAMC; thus, changing the Ordinance No. NS-XXXX City Council 26 — 22 1710654 6 zoning district is found to be consistent with the General Plan of the City of Santa Ana and otherwise justified by the public necessity, convenience, and general welfare. Section 2. The recitals above are each incorporated by reference and adopted as findings by the City Council. Section 3. The City Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in the analysis performed pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Environmental Review No. 2023-40). In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the CEQA Guidelines, the project is categorically exempt from further review per Section 15301 (Class 1 — Existing Facilities) of the CEQA Guidelines. Class 1 exemption applies to the operation, repair maintenance, permitting, leasing, licensing, or minor alteration of existing public or private structures, facilities, mechanical equipment, or topographical features, involving negligible or no expansion of existing or former use. The subject project is proposing the change of use of an existing industrial building that was previously used for an auto repair business to be used for administrative office purposes. Additionally, the project is exempt from further review pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21083.3 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15183, the Project is exempt from further review. This type of exemption analysis evaluates whether the potential environmental impacts of the proposed change of use for the existing 5,837-square-foot building from auto -repair to administrative office and site improvements that include new landscape, fagade remodel, and new outdoor areas for the office and the school are addressed in the City of Santa Ana General Plan Update Final Recirculated Program Environmental Impact Report (GPU EIR). A rezoning that is consistent with an adopted general plan falls within this exemption. (A) As set forth in CEQA Guidelines Section 15183(a), projects that are "consistent with the development density established by the existing zoning, community plan or general plan policies for which an EIR was certified shall not require additional environmental review, except as might be necessary to examine whether there are project -specific significant effects which are peculiar to the project or its site." The CEQA Guidelines further state that "[i]f an impact is not peculiar to the parcel or to the project, has been addressed as a significant effect in the prior EIR, or can be substantially mitigated by the imposition of uniformly applied development policies or standards ... then an additional EIR need not be prepared for the project solely on the basis of that impact." CEQA Guidelines Section 15183(c). (B) The GPU was adopted, and the GPU EIR certified, in April 2022 (State Clearinghouse Number 2020029087); the GPU went into effect on May 26, 2022. Any decision by the City affecting land use and development must be consistent with the GPU. The GPU EIR evaluates the potential environmental effects associated with implementation of the GPU and addresses appropriate and feasible mitigation measures that would minimize or eliminate these impacts. A project is consistent with the GPU if its development density is the same or less than the standard expressed for the involved parcel in the general plan for which an EIR has been certified, and the project complies with the density -related standards contained in that plan. CEQA Guidelines section 15183(i)(2). Development density standards can include the number of dwelling units per Ordinance No. NS-XXXX City Council 26 — 23 171085 6 acre, the number of people in a given area, floor area ratio (FAR), and other measures of building intensity, building height, size limitations, and use restrictions. (C) The GPU identifies that the Interim Development Standard for the FLEX-1.5 area is M1. The M1 zone provides for a variety of light industrial uses, including warehousing, manufacture, assembly, machine shops, wholesale businesses and ancillary uses such as office uses that do not exceed thirty (30) percent of the gross floor area. The Project would result in a FAR of 0.14, which is within the projections of the GPU EIR, which evaluated a density of 1.5 FAR on the site. The GPU EIR adequately anticipated and analyzed the impacts of this Project and identified applicable mitigation measures necessary to reduce impacts of the Project, and the Project implements the applicable mitigation measures. (D) Specifically, the Project qualifies for the exemption because the following findings can be made: 1. The Project is consistent with the development density established by existing zoning, community plan or general plan policies for which an EIR was certified. The Project would result in a FAR of 0.14, which is less than the maximum FAR of 1.5 allowable in the FLEX-1.5 designated area, which is the development density established by the GPU and analyzed in the GPU EIR. The Project site has an Interim Development Standard of M-1 (light Industrial zone). The M-1 zone does not have density requirements. 2. There are no Project specific effects which are peculiar to the Project or its site, and which the GPU EIR failed to analyze as significant effects. The subject property is similar to other properties in the area, including its land use designation and zoning. The property does not support any peculiar environmental features, and the Project would not result in any peculiar effects. In addition, as explained further in the prepared Exemption Checklist, project impacts were adequately analyzed by the GPU EIR; and as detailed in the GPU EIR, development projects pursuant to the GPU, such as the proposed Project, could result in potentially significant impacts to air quality, greenhouse gas emissions, and noise. However, applicable mitigation measures specified within the GPU EIR would reduce potential impacts to a less than significant level. 3. There are no potentially significant off -site and/or cumulative impacts which the GPU EIR failed to evaluate. The Project is consistent with the density and use characteristics of the development considered by the GPU EIR and would represent a small part of the growth that was forecast for build -out of the GPU. The GPU EIR considered the incremental impacts of the Project, and as explained further in the prepared Exemption Checklist, no potentially significant off -site or cumulative impacts have been identified which were not previously evaluated. 4. There is no substantial new information which results in more severe impacts than anticipated by the GPU EIR. As explained in the prepared Exemption Checklist, no new information has been identified which would result in a determination of a more severe impact than what had been anticipated by the GPU Ordinance No. NS-XXXX City Council 26 — 24 171085 6 EIR. 5. As explained in the prepared Exemption Checklist, the Project will undertake feasible mitigation measures specified in the GPU EIR. These GPU EIR mitigation measures will be undertaken through Project design, compliance with regulations and ordinances, and through the Project's conditions of approval. (E) The Project therefore qualifies for an exemption from additional environmental review as set forth in Public Resources Code section 21083.3 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15183. The full exemption analysis is provided in Exhibit 7 of the staff report accompanying this Ordinance. Based on this analysis, a Notice of Exemption, Environmental Review No. 2023-40 will be filed for this project. Section 4. The Specific Development No. 82 (SD-82) zoning document is hereby amended to read as follows: TEMPLO CALVARIO ASSEMBLY OF GOD Specific Development Plan No. 82 Section 1. Applicability of Ordinance The specific development zoning district for the Templo Calvario Assembly of God Church, as authorized by Chapter 41, Division 26, Sec. 41-593 et. seq. of the Santa Ana Municipal Code (SAMC), is specifically subject to the standards and regulations contained in this plan for the express purpose of establishing land use regulations and standards. All other applicable chapters, articles and sections of the SAMC shall apply unless expressly stated or superseded by this ordinance. Section 2. Purpose The Specific Development Plan No. 82 (SD-82) for Templo Calvario consist of standards and regulations established for the express purpose of protecting the health, safety and general welfare of the people of the City of Santa Ana by promoting and enhancing the value of properties and encouraging orderly development of the property. Section 3. Uses Permitted A parcel or building within the Specific Development Plan No. 82 (SD- 82) shall be occupied by only the land uses allowed by this Section 3, and as permitted in created Zones, hereinafter referred to as Zone 1, Zone 2, and Zone 3 ("Zones"), as adopted and depicted in Attachment A. Ordinance No. NS-XXXX City Council 26 — 25 1714 6 Zone 1 1. The permitted land uses within Zone 1 shall be as follows: (a) Administrative offices. (b) Surface parking lot for off-street parking purposes only, exclusive to Parcels 1, 2, and 4 of Parcel Map No. 84-886, as shown on a Map filed in Book 198, Pages 19-20 of Parcel Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of Orange County, California, and any future adioining parcels that may form part of the Civic Center Business Park or its future successors. (c) Private outdoor community area, to be accessible to all Zones, but shall not be used exclusively for school purposes, including but not limited to, outdoor play area, school children play area, nor for school recreational activities. Zone 2 2. The permitted land uses within Zone 2 shall be as follows: (a) The compounding, processing or treatment of raw or previously used materials into a finished or semi -finished product, excluding those specified in SAMC section 41-489.5. (b) The manufacturing of products from raw or previously treated materials, excluding those specified in SAMC section 41-489.5. (c) The assembly of products from raw or previously treated materials, excluding those specified in SAMC section 41-489.5. (d) The packaging or distribution of previously prepared products or materials, excluding those specified in SAMC section 41-489.5. (f) Warehousing (h) Wholesale establishments where the primary trade is business- to- business sale of products, supplies and equipment. Ordinance No. NS-XXXX City Council 26 — 26 1714 6 W Ordinance No. NS-XXXX City Council 26 — 27 1714 6 0 z 111141 7e I"amme. 1 . m Ir r • . 7 r . .............. 01"I'MA'. W.M.M.- 11111 1 2 - r go Oti's i I 1 r . . Ordinance No. NS-XXXX City Council 26 — 28 1714 6 li�.iSlis�l�lfl�r�•��• i�1�11i �i��� r Ordinance No. NS-XXXX City Council 26 — 29 1714 6 1/ r 3. The following uses are permitted when ancillary to any use permitted or permitted with the approval of a conditional use permit in 7nne 2- (a) Administrative office occupying up to thirty (30) percent of the gross floor area. (b) Product sales or service uses occupying up to five (5) percent of the aross floor area. (c) Enclosed storage where the goods, materials or supplies stored are the property of the owner or operator of the building or structure occupying up to thirty (30) percent. 4. The following uses may be permitted in Zone 2 subject to the approval of a conditional use permit in accordance with Section 41- 638 of the SAMC: (a) Principal industrial uses occupying less than seventy (70 percent of the gross floor area with the remainder of the floor area allocated to office use onlv. Ordinance No. NS-XXXX City Council 26 — 30 1/ 2 16 (b) Childcare facilities other than as permitted by section 41-472.1 of tha .Ann(. (c) Trade schools which provide instruction which requires the operation of heavy equipment or machinery normally associated with manufacturing operations such as woodworkina or machine shoos. (d) Industrial medical clinics which offer medical services by referral only and do not offer overnight stays. (e) Administrative office use ancillary to a permitted industrial use occupying more than thirty (30) percent of the gross floor area. Zone 3 5. The permitted land uses within Zone 3 shall be as follows: (a) Schools and ancillary school uses. 6. The following uses are permitted when ancillary to any uses permitted or permitted with the approval of a conditional use permit in 7nna'I- (a) Outdoor play area, ancillary to school uses. 7. The following uses may be permitted in Zone 3 subject to the approval of a conditional use permit in accordance with Section 41- 638 of the SAMC: (a) Churches and ancillary church uses. Section 4. Development Standards 1. Walls and Screening. Any equipment, whether on the roof, side of building or ground, shall be screened. The method of screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building in terms of materials, color, shape and size. 2. Landscaping Standards. All landscaped areas shall be irrigated using an automatic irrigation system. The project shall provide landscaping consistent with the existing landscape theme and existing improvements on -site. A six-inch raised concrete curb shall be required around all landscape planters unless approved by the City Landscape Associate. (a) A landscape area not less than 5 feet wide shall be maintained on the north (OCTA right-of-way) parking lot on Ordinance No. NS-XXXX City Council 26 — 31 1/ 2 16 Fairview Street. (b) All new landscape planters and landscaped areas shall meet the commercial landscape planter standards. (c) Vine pockets shall be provided along the north (OCTA right- of-way) block wall every 15 feet. 3. Architectural and Design Features. (a) Exterior Materials: Changes to the exterior materials and finishes shall be submitted to the Planning Division for review and approval. The materials and finishes shall be consistent with those found on the site. (b) Trash Enclosure: Trash enclosures and similar ancillary structures are to match the texture, materials and color palette of the proposed buildings. (c) Lighting Standards/Fixtures: A minimum of one -foot candle of light shall be provided throughout the parking area. Specifications of light standards/fixtures and photometrics plan shall be submitted to the Planning Division for approval. 4. School Operational Standards (a) A Traffic Plan shall be submitted for review and approval. The Plan shall include specifics on school bus drop-off and pick-up areas (limited to front of building), student drop-off and pick- up areas (limited to rear of building), and the driveways to be used for these functions. (b) A Safety Plan shall be submitted for review and approval. At a minimum, the Plan shall include provisions for student safety to the campus, during school operating hours, and safety exiting the campus. (c) PhySiGal edUGatien aa�tieS shall be limited try indeers enl y No an shall be Rath ante d outside building. rv�ucti �Frti�s��un--v���rrcrcrcr minima im of 10 square feet n��ysiGall aGtivit area per studeRtshall be nroyirJorJ Physical education activities shall be limited to indoors and the outdoor designated gated area. Any changes to the designated outdoor play area shall be submitted to the Plannina Division for review and aaaroval. Ordinance No. NS-XXXX City Council 26 — 32 1/ 16 (d) Student enrollment for the school shall be capped at a maximum of 870 students. (e) A Parking Management Plan shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to the start of each school year. The plan shall be submitted to Planning Staff and the community association at least 15 days prior to the start of school. The Plan shall include provisions for parking during special events at the school. (f) The school shall submit an annual Special Events Program to Planning Staff and the community association at least 15 days prior to the start of the school year. The Program shall include provisions for notification of neighbors within SD-82, vehicle circulation, and parking during special events at the school. (g) Schools are subject to periodic review by the Planning Division to ensure compliance with the school; Operational Standards. Failure to comply with the Operational Standards may result in a review by the Planning Commission for further action. 5. Property Maintenance. (a) Graffiti: All graffiti shall be removed from the premises within 24 hours of discovery and/or notification of graffiti on the premises. (b) Parking Lot/Drive Aisles: Parking and driveway areas located on the parcels shall be kept in a good and clean condition. Standards maintenance and repairs of paved surfaces shall be conducted on a regular basis. The normal cleaning and removal of refuse and trash shall occur on the premises. (c) Landscaping: All landscaping shall be maintained at all times. Any dead or missing landscaping shall be replaced in a timely mnnnar Section 5. Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Reciprocal Parking and Access Agreements (a) The CC&Rs governing the subject properties shall be refined and submitted to the City prior to permit issuance of any site improvements, included but not limited to the following: I. Square footage addition to any of the existing buildings Ordinance No. NS-XXXX City Council 26 — 33 1/ 16 II. Fences III. Storage sheds IV. Landscape planters (b) A copy of a recorded and executed reciprocal parking and access agreement shall be provided to the Planning and Building Agency (PBA), prior to permit issuance of any site improvements as listed in Section 5 (a). The reciprocal parking and access agreement shall include language for reciprocal parking and access among legal Parcels 1, 2, and 4, as shown on Parcel Map No. 84-886, as shown on a Map filed in Book 198, Pages 19-20 of Parcel Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of Orange County, California. (c) Alternative to the requirements in Section 5(b), an equivalent action/document can be provided to the PBA ensuring that the subject properties meet all required off-street parking and access requirements. Section 5. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby declares that it would have adopted this ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions be declared invalid or unconstitutional. Section 6. The Clerk of the Council shall certify the adoption of this ordinance and shall cause the same to be published as required by law. ADOPTED this day of , 2024. Valerie Amezcua Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: Sonia R. Carvalho City Attorney By: n i;", se Montoya Assistant City Attorney Ordinance No. NS-XXXX City Council 26 — 34 1/ 16 AYES: Councilmembers NOES: Councilmembers ABSTAIN: Councilmembers NOT PRESENT: Councilmembers Ordinance No. NS-XXXX City Council 26 — 35 1/ 16 CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY I, Jennifer L. Hall, City Clerk, do hereby attest to and certify the attached Ordinance No. NS XXXX to be the original ordinance adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on , 2024 and that said ordinance was published in accordance with the Charter of the City of Santa Ana. Date: City Clerk City of Santa Ana Ordinance No. NS-XXXX City Council 26 — 36 1/ 2 16 Attachment A City Council 26 — 37 1/16/2024 11/8/23, 6:05 PM coning Zoned — General Agri cul[u ral Community Cam mercial Lcm m u nity Cam mercial -Museum ❑istrict ■ General Commercial ■ Planned Shopping Center ■ Arterial Ca m mercial ■ Commercial Residential ■ South Main Street Commercial District Govemment Center . Light Industrial ■ Heaoy Industrial ■ Open Space land M etro East Overlay Zone ■ Pmtessional Single -Family Residence ■ Two -Family Residence ■ Multiple -Family Residence ■ Suburban Apartment ■ Residential -Estate ■ Specific Development No I ■ Specific Development No- It ■ Specific Development No- 12 ■ Specific Development No- 13 ■ Specific Development No- 15 ■ Specific Development No 16 ■ Specific Development No- 17 ■ Specific Development No- 18 ■ Specific Development No- 19 ■ Specific Development No- 2 ■ Specific Development No- 20 ■ Specific Development No- 21 ■ Specific Development No- 25 ■ Specific Development No- 26 ■ Specific Development No- 27 ■ Specific Development No- 31 ■ Specific Development No- 32 ■ Specific Development No- 34 ■ Specific Development No- 35 ■ Specific Development No- 36 ■ Specific Development No- 38 ■ Specific Development No 39 ■ Specific Development No-4 ■ Specific Development No-40 ■ Specific Development No-41 ■ Specific Development No-42 ■ Specific Development No_43 ■ Specific Development No-44 ■ Specific Development No-46 ■ Specific Development No-48 ■ Specific Development No-49 `q City Council 26 — 38 n 7n?4 ninitAi Man PT71'V UL�F [2dl iphtc racarvar1 https://apps.spatialstream.com/landvision/production/CurrentBuild/Html/printpreview.html / I AA No. 2023-04 and ZOA No. 2023-03 601 N. Fairview Street R1 m- WOW `"'7 r O R1 1 -I c2W Tr 1112 iiiii R1 - - R2 lid R1 �s t uF R2 r FI iiak4r:lr.r� F: R.1 R1 R2 D 8 mi rf N11. JJI �Li1:tJ 15 M 1 '� N11 r IW.I - rt it dt r� �-- � . Wiffliam N 400 feet Exhibit 3 - Vicinity Zoning and Aerial Map 1/2 11/8/23, 6:05 PM City Council 26 — 39 1 /16/2024 https://apps.spatialstream.com/1andvision/production/CurrentBuiId/HtmI/printpreview.htm1 2/2 _ _ ± a _ , �.��'�►�� w s •yy !.` �• e ��:a � '`era .. ..__ r __ --` � - - }�• ' � * ._ r t-;V ��bt tltl ■■ �, Frt#�� � �_: yh }��� ■■ E�� ■ 1��1Ji f�!1� /i _ r $To - - r 1 �r ��W E L si_ ,,.y., . �,,�..:�. 1" 7 M�� �S1 n�� 1ilJt'iY. p� :■u■■u■^u�s�■■u■■uuuuuuu■■■■■■uu.■u■■uu■uu.■■■■■■1q)ff ■ ■ C MAZES 8833F5 E8. ]FS 88.69 ■ ■ • / 8B.66F5 88.19F5 ■ ■ I o.sz ■ 140 NP�yv�ort]0 rater / II O.SR 0.5R 21Cil flPe ItVCfl, CA sa GBI��glq- G9��tl� / ■ - _ - - TV - e � - ■ O (zaem \ 88.36 88.2 88.21 88_14F5 88.0]FS �� BB.00FS �BJ.92FS ■ Imu ■ 1 B8,2$FS .' 4'CF - d'CE - O / �' ! \X I 'h • ,', 1.0R J.5R 0.5$0.5R b` IT _es 5T5S &OS J d$hI bar 1 U � / / / i' / .+u • ■ \! I d'ch � ...iMATCH.. ._�/ ....■ \ W o 17: P,: rr^^ p0� \ ■ 1 1 ,r o \ ■ V J / h jaanie /''� - \ ■ 1 4'11 88.22FS $ \ ■ Q MATCH IX. \ ■■■■■■■■ �■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■ ■■■■■■■M■■■■■■■■■■�■ W LU W U &57)FS%� ENLARGED GRADING PLAN U� i 4 FFGGMATCH EX \\ - lu Q Q Q �\ � � LLZ m:m ee BOPS \ \ Z Q / / % / /✓ \ v _TcnIX �, 6e.6us A LEGEND: Q / ♦ 1 m 88 q j (7 / o/ R / �� ♦♦�/ B. BIT$ \I/( PROPERTY LINE / � / ♦ � ��p. y �C n � � � � LIMR OF WORK /� j � � � Fr - tDP�♦ 8.55FS !l MATCH EX J ♦♦♦ GS,y,� MATCH IX. °ss C - ♦ �NUL I / r6.w6rc FSEx. M^'�H'F i ♦♦ �'9y UTILITY CONSTRUCTION NOTES: SPS � a �; °" ♦ STORM DRAIN A % ] 61 EL ' M4T7 E . ♦♦:839 R ,1, ` p \ E iCH E% 20 FS ♦♦ yp ♦♦ \ s3 SD7 �0 BSIZE A STORM E PER PIPE PER CITY OF SANTA PNA SN. MATCH Ex ♦ 'N ♦ � 1150. SIZE AND SLOPE PER PIN. FS ♦ SD2 12-X12' JENSEN PRECAST CONCRETE CATCH BASIN MATCH IX. ♦♦ � ♦ �'�. 503 HYDRO INTERNATIONAL HYDRODYNAMIC SEPARATOR oP ,�� CPl1F MATCH IX. ♦♦ � �� e1.90F5 Y \ SD4 ADS STORMTECH MC-7200 INFlLTRAiION10 CiLLERY. W 31 JB7.95F5 Z> 88.4 88.28F5 n� -�-,\- �`... 87.88F5 MATCH IX. \ .B 84]T E IXIX . ~ MATCH . �♦ �\ / 88797'A /TCH/MATCH IX MATCH , s ♦♦� .}. Ca 'tA1 I 8].]3FS i �. z - �S _ oN MATCH EX. / 601-605 FAIkVIEW ST � � ♦♦ �� � q° MATCH ' IX ® MATCH IX. AREAS] I 'F 9 87.6/ \ HEIGHT WE i TCH I C W� --}-� 86.83F5 Cfi', riNp'V9' MATCH IX. \ H EX 86 }4FF5 0 "sai 43) � -MATCH �_ 1y 89°53 d3�E 83.3I � MATCH I .: (AA "•MAT E �y IIX z c IX .Aa -rr --- d+ --af II //� ` AI � tU \85,9 des a o. m ds. r a \ \1\ \ e_ ____________ IA41CH IX,. } � EX. + - -- - sa lwsi 3 °aaanl�/.a �''e26 �.-�_ _ -- � � -ao�_ ®'�o IMTC 'M4TCH IX ,; � - wa ' �a a mars iza� nmrs AZ' d MATac mnrs TC IX a TCH IX. - \ S� 1� l� � - - FS / 1� rs � e iCHS IX. H 2` IEXX� as za PL B MATCH IX..e. H AN IX MATCH . 46 FL '^ \C'• ADS STORMIECH MATCH IX. G OBSERVATION FORT \ a�Ay pat A�'/n S�+ \ �� MATCH EX. k 4 \ L \o.� rf�l�it ��()l Ry 8J.00 IAJ m Ary SG(1476°kVdq%S I I I i is 1b�'0 � I MATCH � es. 1 8S`s msc`s �A���~ � � LI er:awn y I r =ryIo/ ,.......... Rim 9 �/ �PF Tcx E%. ' MAicH EX. �n� �sM'------�// °mo e s _ j � \ \ cDcr Cked : - Al BY� I_ OECIFIE 4 y/+ // auxwew � 1 a* MATCH IX. MATCH �k'// ��� X__-____ e PRELIMINARY o\ 4 GRADINGAND o e DRAINAGE PLAN TCH IX. MATCH IX. MATCH IX. I Ss 'O OAS City Councild_„'3B',d—R_,,Bg BB-1=23518----------� 26 — 44 _' � ,. 1/16/2,B p ,B }Ct7 - - - --B�°,zaz.AA E -, � CR4PHIC SGNE1. 30 - GENERAL NOTES: 1. ALL WORK MOWN HEREON SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THE AGC/APNA STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION (CURRENT EDMON) AND SUPPLEMENTAL STANDARD PROVISIONS ISSUED BY AND FOR USE IN THE CITY OF SANTA ANA 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH STANDARD PUN 1160. REFER TO HTiP:/NOW.VIRAL-AN4.WV/PNA/DOCUMENS/116D ST.PDF. COPIES ARE AVNUBLE AT TILE PUBUC WORKS COUNTER. 3. WITHIN 72 HOURS AFTER FINAL SUFEACING IS PLACED, ALL WHOLE AND VALVE BOX FRAMES AND COVERS SHALL BE ADJUSTED BY THE DEVELOPER TO FINISH GRADE THIS IS TO BE DONE PRIOR TO PLACING SEAL COAT. 4. AMEN CONSTRUCTION OF ASPHALT CONCRETE (AC) PAVEMENT INCLUDES REPLACEMENT OF PAVEMENT OVER TRENCHES, PATCHES OR CUTS OR AN AC OVERLAY, PAVEMENT SHALL BE COVERED WITH PENETMAON TYPE ASPWLi EMULSION (0.07 GALLONS PER SQUARE YARD) AFTER STREET PAVEMENT HAS BEEN CLEANED. FOG SEAL COAT IS ONT REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION OF NEW STREETS OR WIDENING OF EXISTING STREETS. 5. FEATHER AC WHERE MEETING EXISTING PAVEMENT. FEATHER TO LANE MINIMUM OF 10 FEET OR AS DIRECTED BY THE CITY ENGINEER. 6. THE ENGINEER FOR THE SUBDIVIDER SHALL PROVIDE HUBS IN THE STREET FOR FINISHED SUBGRADE AND FINISHED GRADE AT THE CROWN, AT ALL POINTS WHERE ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN ON THE PLANS AND AT ANY ADDITONAL POINTS REQUIRED BY THE CITY ENGINEER. 7. AT THE TIME OF COMPACTING THE BASE SOIL AND PREPARING SUBGRADE, IF THE MOISTURE CONTENT IS SUCH THAT THE SPECIFIED RELATIVE COMPACTION CANNOT BE OBTMNED OR THE SUBGRADE IS YIELDING, THE FOLLOWING REMEDIAL ACTION SHALL BE PROVIDED- A. REMOVE EXCESS MOISTURE BY SCARFY1NG AND AERATING, OR B. EXCAVATE UNSTABLE AREAS AND BACKFILL WITH SUTABLE MATERIAL OR BASE, OR C. INCREASE THE AGGREGATE WE SECTION, OR D. STABILIZE THE BASEMENT SOIL WTM SUITABLE ADDITIVES, OR E PROVIDE AN ALTERNATE METHOD SUITABLE 1D THE CITY ENGINEER 8. WATER MANS AND SERVICES ARE TO BE INSTALLED BY TEE DEVELOPER AFTER THE CURB AND GUTTER 6 CONSTRUCTED AND BEFORE TEE WE UNDER THE AN SURFACING IS LAID. CONTACT WATER OMSION SUPERVISOR AT 714-647-3343 TO ARRANGE SCHEDULING FOR WATER SYSTEM WORK BY THE CITY. 9. THE SUDOMDER SHALL RELOCATE PLAY EXISTING PUBUC DAMES LOCATED IN A DEDICATED RIGHT-0E-WAY, AS REQUIRED BY THE CITY. C�TT OF SANTA ANA PUBUIC �N0HK2 A91EHICIf PROJECT DP NO.2023-10; MID NO.2023-180301 VISTA HERITAGE GLOBAL ACADEMY EXPANSION 601 N FAIRVIEW ST SANTA ANA, 92703 GENERAL NOTES FOR PUBUC WORKS PERMITTED WORK ON WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM: 1. CONSTRUCTION AND INSTALLATION OF ALL WATER MAINS AND APPURTENANCES SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF SANTA ANA STANDARD PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. WHERE THE STANDARD PLANS ARE SILENT, CONSTRUCTION AND INSTALLATION OF SEWER MANS AND APPURTENANCES SHALL CONFORM TO THE AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSOCIATION (AMA) SPEWICATRMIS AND THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR PUBIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION, 2012 EDITION. 2. CONSTRUCTION OF WATER AWNS AND APPURTENANCES SHALL ONLY BE PERFORMED BY QUALIFIED CONTRACTORS WITH A VAUD CAUFORNIA CONTRACTOR A OR C34 UCENSE. 3. NO PERSON, OTHER THAN CITY OF SANTA ANA WATER RESOURCES DIVISION STAFF CUMMED BY THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA AS A WATER DISTRIBUTOR OPERATOR SHALL BE ALLOWED TO OPERATE THE CLAWS WATER SYSTEM VALVE. 4. NO PERSON, OTHER THAN CITY OF SANTA ANA WATER RESOURCES DIVISION STAFF CERTIFIED BY THE STATE OF CWFORNR AS A WATER DISTRIBUTOR OPERATOR SHALL SHUT WATER SERVICE OFF TO ANY CUSTOMER. 5. PRIOR TO THE MART OF CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL. SUBMIT TO THE CITY FOR RUM AND APPROVAL 'DISINFECIION AND FLUSHING PLAN' PER THE CITY OF SANTA ANA DESIGN GUIDEUNES AND STANDARD DRAWINGS. 6. ALL NEWLY CONSTRUCTED WATER MANS AND APPURTENANCES SHALL BE DISINFECTED AND TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH AWWA SPECIFICATIONS, SECTION CIMYS, PRIOR TO CONNECTING TO THE GAYS WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM. DISINFECTION TESTING RESULTS SHALL BE SUBAITO TO THE WATER RESOURCES DIVISION WHEN REQUIRED FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL PRIOR TO CONNECTING TO THE CTY'S WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM. 7. WATER MANS WILL BE HYDROSTATIC TESTED AT 200 PSI FOR 2 HOURS. NEW WATER MANS CANNOT BE TESTED AGAINST AN EXISTING VALVE BUT CAN BE TESTED USING A TEST PLATE. 8. REQUESTS TO SHUT DOWN THE WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM FOR TIE-INS OR OTHER PURPOSES SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE WATER RESOURCES DMSION STAFF AT LEAST 2 WEEKS IN ADVANCE THROUGH THE CITY INSPECTOR. ALL CUSTOMERS AFFECTED BY THE PROPOSED SHUT DOWN SHALLBE NOTIFIED IN WRITING 48 XOURS IN ADVANCE BY THE CONTRACTOR. 9. THE CITY OF VITA ANA WATER RESOURCES DIVISION CANNOT GUMANDEE A COMPLETE SNUACM OF EXISTING MANS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DMATERING AND ISOLATION OF CONSTRUCTION FOR TESTING OR ANY OTHER PURPOSES. 10. ALL FIRE HYDRANTS WHICH ARE OUT OF SEANCE OR NEW ARE HYDRANTS WHICH HAVE NOT BEEN ACCEPTED FOR SERVICE SHALL BE COVERED WITH A SMALL INDICATING THAT THE HYDRANTS ARE NOT IN SERVICE. 11. MAMANING WATER SERVICE SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR FOR ANY SHUTDOWN LASTING LONGER THAN FOUR (4) HOURS. METHOD OF PROVIDING TEMPORARY SERVICE MUST BE APPROVED BY THE WATER RESOURCES DIVISION. THE WATER SHALL BE SAE FOR DRINKING IN ACCORDANCE WON STATE OF CALIFORNIA WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD (SWRCB) DRINKING WATER PROGRAM (DWP). 12 WATER METER WILL NOT BE INSTALLED NOR WATER TURNED ON UNTIL THE BACKFLOW DEVICES REWIRED FOR LOCATION MA(NOT TO SCALE) SPECIAL NOTES 1. THE Cltt ENGINEER'S SIGNATURE ON THESE PUNS DOES NOT CONSTRUE /PRIM& O ANY OF THE FOLLOWING NOTES, AND THE CITY SHALL NOT BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR THEN ENFORCEMENT. 2. NEITHER THE OWNER NOR THE ENGINEER WILL ENFORCE SAFETY MEASURES OR REGULATIONS. THE CONTRACTION SHALL DESIGN, CONSTRUCT, AND MAMAN ALL SAFETY OENiCES, INCLUDING TRENCH SHOEING AND TRAFFIC CONITR04 AND SHALL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR CONFORMING TO ALL LOCH, STATE, AND FEDI SAFETY AND HEALTH STANDARDS, LAWS, AND REGULATIONS. 3. THE CONTRACTOR BVML ADJUST Al EXISTING FACILITIES TO FINAL GRADE AT NO NIDMOM COST TO THE GUY. 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE. REPLACE, AND/OR RELOCATE ALL MUM F91 H THAT INTERFERE WITH THE WORK HEREON AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE CITY OR DEVELOPER. 5. TIE CONTACTOR 6HAL REMOVE, REPLACE, AND/OR RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UNDSOAPE, HANDSCAPE, IRRIGATON SYSTEMS, DAMES, AND/OR READ IMPROVEMENTS WHICH CONFLICT IN ANY WAY WON THE INSIALLARON OR FUNCTION OF THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS Ai ND ADDITIONAL COST TO THE QTY. 6. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY CLEARANCE Ai ALL METY CROSSING. IF INTERFERENCE OCCURS, OTHER THAN NOTED ON PAN, CONTRACTOR TO CONTACT DESIGN EMMNEER MR POSSIBLE RE➢ESIGK IF RITE N I 10. PERMIT NOTE: THE MIMING AND IRRIGATION SYSTEMS HAVE BEEN INSTALLED, TESTED, APPROVED ARM CERTIFIED. CONTACT UNFFl51BLE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE UTILITY AT NO EXPENSE TO ENGINEER NO PERM R WILL BE ISSUED FOR INSTALLATION OF UNDERGROUND UTILITY UNES UNTIL STUD UTILITY THE WATER RESOURCES DMSION AT 714-647-3320. 7. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY CAMGE TO SIDEWXN AND STREET. CONTRACTOR AGREES TO REPNR AND REPIACE ALL MIMING PUBLIC STREET UNES ARE SHOWN ON THE STREET IMPROVEMENT PEWS AND THEM LOCATIONS ARE CERTF1ED BY THE PRIVATE ENGINEER AND APPROVED BY THE CITY. 13. ALL WATER MAINS SHALL BE AWWA C-900 PVC, DR14 PIPE OR AWWA C-151 DUCTILE IRON PIPE. ALL OTHER MPROVEMENTS DAMAGED DUNK CONSOUCTON. PIPE MATERIALS REQUIRE SPECIAL REVIEW AND APPROVAL FROM THE WATER RESOURCES DIVISION. PRIVATE ENGINEER'S NOTICE TO CONTRACTORS 11. VCO SEWER CONNEWDNS ARE TO BE CONSTRUCTED FROM SEWER MANS TO THE PROPERTY UNE. THE 14. WATER MANS SHALL HAVE 36" MINIMUM COMER TO FINISHED GRADE. ANY DEVIATION FROM THIS REQUIREMENT DEVELOPER IS TO FURNISH THE CITY WITH THE LOCATION OF EACH CONNECTION. AL SEVER LATERALS ARE REQUIRES APPROVAL FROM THE WATER RESOURCES DIVISION. PRIVATE AND PUBUC DAMES, IF SHOWN, REFLECT AVAILABLE RECORD DATA TO BE REFERENCED ON CURB. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONBBLE FOR LOCATINGL LA G ANES AFFECTING 12. ALL VCP JOINTS SHALL BE PLASTIC MECHANICAL COMPRESSION 401M OR BANDSEALS. 15. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY DEPTH AND LOCATION OF ALL UTIMES PRIOR TO TRENCHING. 16. PRIVATE WATER APPURTENANCES SUCH AS BACKROW PREVENTERS, ARE HYDRANTS AND STANDPIPES, AND THIS WOW AND FOR ANY DAMAGE OR PROTECTION TO THESE UNES. PRIOR TO STARTING=CONS7RUCIION OF THIS PROJECT, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL UNCOVER AL EXISTING UTIUTY UNES AFFECTING THIS WORK AND VERIFY THE ELEVATION 13. IT SHALL BE TIE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE SEWER CONTRACTOR TO EXPOSE ALL JOIN POINTS TO THE VALVES SHALL BE PAINTED AS FOLLOWS: A DOMESTIC WATER: BLUE OF SAID UTTUTY LINES. EXISTING SEWER AND TO HAVE THE LOCATION AND ELEVATION VERIFIED PRIOR TO ANY SEWER STAKES EL POABLE IRRIGTON: GREEN AL CONTACTORS AND SUBCONTRACTORS PERFORMING ANY WORK SHOWN ON BEING FURNISHED. C. RECYCLED IRRIGATION: PURPLE OR RELATED TO THESE PUNS SHALL CONDUCT THEIR OPERATIONS SO THAT ALL 14, R SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO HAVE ALL FLOW WE ELEVATIONS AT ALL SERER D. FIRE PROTECTION: OSHA SAFETY RED EMPLOYEES ARE PROVIDED A SAFE PLACE TO WORK AND THE PUBUC IS PROTECTED. ALL CONTRACTORS AND SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL COMPLY VAN THE MANHOLES VERIFIED PRIOR TO ANY PIPE 8CONTRA *ASOR BULLY FLAW LINE ELEVATIONS ARE TO BE 17. DO NOT CUT OR SNAP CUT OR MILL ASBESTOS CEMENT PIPE. WHERE JOINING EXISTING ASBESTOS CEMENT PIPE, EXPOSE SIX FEET IN EACH DIRECTION, LOOKING FOR THE NEAREST JOINT AND JOIN TO NEW PIPE WITH OC RATIONAL SAFELY AID HEALTH REGULATIONS' OF THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, WITHTHE "CONSTRUCTION SAFETY ORDERS" OF THE STATE OF SUBMITTED TO THE CITY PRIOR TO ANY PAVING. A PROPERLY DIMENSIONED ADAPTER PER STANDARD PLAN NUMBER 1443. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL REGULATIONS AND WITH ULTRANS AREA 15. CAL UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT AT 800-422-4133 AT LEAST 48 HOURS (TWIT WORKING DAYS) PRIOR 18. DO NOT TAP EXISTING MANS WITHOUT THE PRESENCE OF A CERTIFIED WATER INSPECTOR. PRESSURE TEST TRAFFIC CONTROL HANDBOOK (WATCH). HOWEVER. THE CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER AND THE CITY OF SANTA ANA SHALL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE IN ANY WAY FOR TO ANY EXCAVATION WHICH MAY DAMAGE OR INTERRUPT THE SERVICE OF ANY UNDERGROUND UTILITY UNE. TAPPING SLEEVE IN THE PRESENCE OF A CERTIFIED WATER INSPECTOR BEFORE TAPPING EXISTING MAN. SAID COMPLIANCE BY THE CONTACTOR OR ANY SUBCONTRACTORS. 16. USE FULL DEPTH HEADER FOR VERTICAL FACES OF ROG CONSTRUCTOR. 17. ANY PERMANENT BARRICADE OR SAFETY SIGN OMITTED ON THE PLANS AND CONSIDERED NECESSARY BY THE CITY SHALL BE INSTALLED BY THE DEVELOPER AT NO COST TO THE CITY. 18. STREET UGHTNG: BEFORE ANY ELECTRICAL CABLE OR CONDUIT IS PLACED FOR STREET UGHTS, THE LOCATIONS FOR THE PROPOSED STREET UGHTS ARE TO BE VERIFIED BY THE CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR AT 714-647-5074 AFTER THESE LOCATIONS HAVE BEEN MARKED OUT AS SHOWN ON THE IMPROVEMENT PLANS BY THE DEVELOPER/CONTRACTOR. 19. CLEANUP AND DUST CONTROL THE CONTACTOR SHALL KEEP THE WORK9IE CLEAN AND FREE FROM RUBBISH AND DEBRIS AT THE END OF EVERY WO KING DAY AND PROTECT EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS PER SECTION 7-9 OF THE STANDARD SPECIFICATION FOR PUBUC WORKS CONSTRUCTION. 20. CONTACT TREE SECTION SUPEMSOR 714-647-3337 BEFORE INSTALLING ANY TREES. 21. TO OBTAIN A PERMIT TO ACCESS WATER FROM AFIRE HYDRANT CONTACT THE CITY YARD AT (714)-647-3380. F NO, REVISIONS 19. FINAL ACCEPTANCE WILL NOT OCCUR UML ORIGINAL RECORD DRAWINGS ON MMYIAR AND DIGIT& FORMAT ARE DELIVERED TO AND ACCEPTED BY THE CITY'S INSPECTOR. SHOW AL FIELD CHANGES ON RECORD DRAWINGS. 20. TRENCH PLATES SHALL BE FLUSH WITH PAVEMENT AND BE NON-SKID. 21. WHEN PUBLIC WATER FACILITIES ARE LOCATED ON PRIVATE PROPERTY, EASEMENT DOCUMENTS ARE TO BE SUBMITTED TO CRY FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO A PERMIT BEING ISSUED. 22. AL RECYCLED WATER PROJECTS REWIRE KNEW AND APPROVAL FROM THE WATER RESOURCES DMSION. 23. REMOVE FROM THE FIELD UPPER AND LOWER ARE HYDRANT DRY BARREL AND 24' X 36' IRON VAULT UD COVERS AND DELIVER UNDAMAGED TO THE CRY WATER RESOURCES DIVISION YARD LOCATED AT 215 S. CENTER STREET. PRIOR NOTIFICATION OF THE DEANERY IS REQUIRED AT 714-647-3320. A WATER MAN FITTINGS SHALL BE FLANGE OR MECHANICAL JOINTS ONLY, NO PUSH -ON JOINT FRANCS ALLOWED. 25. CONTRACTORS SHALL NOT REMOVE OR DISPOSE EXISTING WATER METERS. CONTACTOR SHALL APPLY FOR AN ABANDON WATER METER APPLICATION. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT WATER RESOURCES DIVISION AT 714-647-3320 FOR EXISTING METER REMOVALS, 26. INSTALLATION OF NEW WATER METER SERVICE CURB STOP SHALL BE DONE AFTER INSTALLATION OF NEW CURB AND GUTTER OR AFTER CONTRACTOR HAS ESTABLISHED THE PROPOSED CURB GRADE BY STAKING OF THE PROPOSED CORE. REFERENCES FURTHERMORE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF WNSIRUCNON OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE UNITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS, AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY, AND HOLD THE OWNER, ENGINEER, AND THE CITY OF SANTA ANA HARMLESS FROM ANY AND AL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK ON THIS PROJECT, EXCEPTING THE WBILIIY ARISING FROM THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF THE OWNER, THE ENGINEER, OR THE CITY OF SANTA ANA. F THE PRNA THE UNDERSIMMED CALL ENGINEER HEREBY CERTIFIES THAT THEY HAVE WE EVERY REIDM IJE EFFORT TO RESEARCH, DETERMINE LOCATION AND DEPICT ALL EXISTING DAMES (GAS, EIECTR AL TELEPHONE, WATER, SEWER, STREET UGH, AND TRAFFIC SIGMA, ETC.) SHOWN ON THESE PLANS; AND THAT THE MURES DEPICTED HEREON DIRECTLY REVEU RELEVANT INFORMATION CONTAINED ON ARMY COMPANY DIRMONGS WAND BY TIE UNDERSIGNED CNL ENGINEER. //w/,/�/� _` 1 �� O6(73/202T AU KHAMSI DATE R.C.E. NO. 24M VICINITY M(NOT TO KALE) All - America City 1I I I I1 PROJECT DIRECTORY: SITE ADDRESS: 601 N. FAIRVIEW STREET STUDIO W ARCHITECTS SANTA ANA, CA 92703 424 32ND STREET NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663 OWNER: 949.774.2920 CONTACT: TOW PACHECO-TAYLOR SCHOLARSHIP PREP FACMY HOLDINGS, LUC 770 THE CITY DRIVE SOUTH, SUITE 420D FdL.itlS�E$ KPFF CONSULTING ENGINEERS ORANGE, CA 92868 CONTACT: ANDREW CROWE 140 NEWPORT CENTER DRIVE, PHONE: 714.795.2195 SUITE 1DO IRMNE, CA 92660 TAX ASSESSOR PARCEL NO: TELL 949.478.8800 CONTACT: NI KHAMSI 405-241-04 ROOD NOTE: FLOOD ZONE 'X' NOT IN A SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA COMMUNITY PANEL NO. 06059CO257J MAP ELATE. DECEMBER 3, 2009 BASIS OF BEARINGS: THE BASIS OF BEARINGS OF THIS SURVEY IS BASED ON FAIRVIEW STREET, BEING NORTH 2807'21' EAST PER PARCEL MAP NO. 84-886. PARCEL MAP BOOK 198, PAGES 19 AND 20 UTILITY SERVICES: WATER: CRY OF SANTA ANA PHONE: 714-647-5454 SEWER: CITY OF SOMA ANA PHONE: 714-647-3380 GAS: SOCAL GAS COMPANY PHONE: 8T7-238-0092 ELECTRICITY: SOCAL EDISON PHONE: 800-655-4555 TVINARNET/PHONE SPECTRUM PHONE: 866-874 M' TRASH: WASTE MANAGEMENT PHONE: 714-558-7761 ARE: ORANGE COUNTY ARE AUTHORITY PHONE: 714-573-5000 SHEET INDEX SHEET NUMBER DESCRIPTION 1 TITLE SHEET I GENERAL NOTES 3 STREET IMPROVEMENT PUN STATEMENT OF WORK: REMOVAL AND RECONSTRUCTION OF EXISTING DRIVEWAY. APPROVED BY DEPUTY PUBUC WORKS DIRECTOR DATE WATER RESOURCE MANAGER Underground G Service Alert Mound CMifom l. TWO WORKING DAYS low. BEFORE YOU DIG CBIIMeMe7ou9g. _ NOTICE TO CONTRACTOR PA N PURSUANT TO ASSEMBLY BILL 42I6 NO EXCAKARGN PERAMT IS VAUD UNLESS ENE C0.'M TOW "`MC" AND OBTAINS A IOC ALERT DOCKET NUMBER. CALL 811 AT LE4S7 iMG NOWNAVG DAYS MOR TO COMINI EXCAVATION. STREET IMPROVEMENTS RTER SCHOOL 601 N.1A6020Z_%SANTA ANA 92703 CITY OF SANTA ANA SHEET 1 OF E GENERAL NOTES FOR PUBUC WORKS PERMITTED WORK ON SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM: DEMOLITION AND CONSTRUCTION QUANTITIES: ABBREVIATIONS: g R/w 1. CONSTRUCTION AND INSTALLATION OF ALL SEWER MANS AND AC ASPHALTIC CONCRETE PVC POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (5E) APPURTENANCES SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF CI CAST IRON PL I PROPERTY LINE NEW CURB SANTA ALA STANDARD PUNS AND SPECIFlCAIONS. WHERE THE ITEM UNIT QUANTITY CL, Q CENTER LINE RCIP RECTANGULAR CAST IRON PIPE & GUTTER STANDARD PLANS RE SILENT. NC CONSTRUCTION AND INSTALLATION TO OF CONSTNUCi COMMERCIAL DRIVEWAY APPROACH PER CITY STD. 1112. TU SEWER MANS AND APPURTENANCES SHALL CONFORM TO THE O CASE 1 G 1 CMU CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT RO ROOF GRAIN I GRIND & 73' 6' q• ' STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION, CO CLEANOM RW, R/W RIGHT-OF-WAY OVERLAY 9 2 2012 EDITION. O REMOVE EXISTING DRIVEWAY APPROACH. EA 1 CONC CONCRETE 2. 3' °F AC 1 4' LID NEW 5= SLOPE EQUALS PAVEMENT / DRMT:WAY 2. CONSTRUCTION OF SEWER MANS AND APPURTENANCES SHALL ONLY O3 SO STORM DRAIN �WCM APPROACH CONSINULT PCC SIDEWAL( PER CTIY STD. 1104, CASE 3. W=8'. SF 34 CIF CURB FACE IX. AC & JOIN ON 8' PC BE PERFORMED BY QUAURED CONTRACTORS WITH A VAUD DW DOMESTIC WATER SSMH SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE PAVEMENT CALIFORNIA CAB CONTRACTOR A OR C34 LICENSE O GRIND HUNTS TO CURB ME UNE.F AC PAVEMENT FROM EDGE OF SF 2497 EL OR ELEV ELEVATION SS SANITARY SEWER - ELEC ELECTRIC, ELECTRICAL SN STANDARD ... 3. All NEYVLY CONSTRUCTED SEWER MANS AND APPURTENANCES 0 2' WIDE FULL -DEPTH AC TRENCH. REPLACEMENT OF FULL -DEPTH AC SF 84 IX. R EXIST. IXISIING___________________________________ OL ___ SHALL BE TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS SECTION TO MATCH EMISTNG AC SECTION. SDMH STORM DRAW MANHOLE 6' CAB FOR PUBLIC WORKS 0ONSTRUCHON. All NEWLY CONSTRUCTED O ADC FIRE DEPARTMHYGRANTENT CONNECRON TC TOP OF CURB SEWER MANS. LATERALS AND "HOLES MUSE BE INSPECTED VIA 6 MLM TRENCH PER CRY STD. 1150. LF ]] ARECLOSED CIRCUIT TELEVISION CAMERA BY A NATIONAL ASSOCIATION 0 CONSTRUCT V WATER SERVICE WITH 5/8' METER PER STANDARD AT FOOT OR FEET TELL TELEPHONE PAVEMENT OF SEWER SBMCE COMPANIES (NAM) CERTTTED TECHNICIAN PLAN NO. 1401 FOR IRRIGATION USE WATER METER TO BE 15 TRAFFIC SIGNAL B' TRENCH AND VIDEO SUBMITTED IN A DIGITAL FORMAT i0 THE WATER INSTALLED BY CITY FORCES AFTER SUBMISSION R WATER METER IX 1 FV GATE VALVE me TRAFIC SIGNAL SOX SLURRY BACKFlLL RESOURCES DIVISION FOR REVIEW AND FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF FEES. CONTACT THE WATER AN ARE WATER TYP TYPICAL RESOURCES DIVISION AT 714-647-3320 FOR ASSISTANCE. PAVEMENT rR-'\ CROSS SECTION AT DRIVEWAY WORK. RESRIRATION PER 11 PLAN NO. 11 SO. GPM GALLONS PER MINUTE 1V TELEVISION ] N.i.9.; STA 91+BD.t7 - SM 9.59123T NV HIGH DENSITY PoLYMTYLENE V.I.F. VERIFY IN FIELD 4. All SEWER MANS SHALL BE VITRIFIED CLAY PIPE (VCP) PIPE OR I PVC MR-26 PIPE ALL OTHER PIPE MATD REQUIRE SPECIAL NJ INVERT VLT VAULT REVIEW AND APPROVAL FROM THE WATER RESOURCES DIVISION. MAX. MAXIMUM VCP VITRIFIED CLAY PIPE MIN. MINIMUM (W) WEST 5. TRENCH PLATES SHALL BE FLUSH WITH PAVEMENT AND SHALL BE MH MANHOLE NON SKID. W WATER PoC POINT OF CONNECTION WM WATER METER 6. 00NIRACTR TO VERIFY DEPTH AND LOCATION OF AL. Un RIES PN POST INDICATOR VALVE m, WATER VALVE (52') PRIOR TO TRENCHING. PCC PORLAND CEMENT CONCRETE EX. 6' CF & PRV PRESSURE REDUCING VALVE CURB GUTTER 10' SIDEWALK 7. WHEN PUBLIC SEWER FACILITIES ARE LOCATED ON PRIVATE PROPERTY, EASEMENT DOCUMENTS ARE TO BE SUBMITTED TO CRY GRIND & 11. FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO A PERMIT BEING ISSUED. OVIDNAY AC 8. FlNA ACCEPTANCE YNLL NOT OCCUR UNTILRIGINI RECORD PAVEMENT DRAWINGS ON MTM AND DIGITAL FORMAT ARE DEUffRED TO AND GENERAL NOTES IX. Ac PAVT]ffM _____ u ACCEPTED BY THE CITY'S INSPECTOR. SHOW ALL FIELD CHANGES 1. ALL WORK SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 'STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR PUBUC WORKS CONSTRUCTION' ................................. --- --- ---- --- S ON RECORD DRAWINGS. AS WRITTEN AND PROMULGATED BY THE 2012 EDITION OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA CHAPTER R THE A.P.W.A. --- - --__� t____ _____ _____ ___ ________ G.C.C. JOINT CORERARVE COMMITTEE HEREIN REFERRED TO AS STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS AND THE CITY P______A-------------------- "- - - OFFAN A` OF SANTA ANAL STANDARD PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS (UNLESS SPECIFICIR CALLY NOTED OTHERWISE OR IN THE SPECIAL ----'-----------'---------'----'-------- 9. P11 SEWER REPARS SHALL ED ACCOMPLISHED USING STAINLESS PROVISIONS FORTHIS PROJECT). STEEL DOUBLE BANDED COUMNGS. 2 THE EXISTENCE AND LOCATION OF ANY UNDERGROUND UTUTY OR STRUCTURE SHOWN ON THESE PLANS ARE OBTAINED BY A SEARCH OF AVAILABLE RECORDS. NO CERTIFICATION IS MADE AS TO ACCURACY OR THOROUGHNESS OF THESE RECORDS TYPICAL CROSS SECTION APPROVAL OF THIS PLAN BY THE CITY OF SANTA ANA DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN EXISTENCE OR NONEXISTENCE R ANY gR, N N.T.S.; STA 9-11 - SA 9u 27, 5M 96a22P7 - SM 96i69.11 UNDERGROUND UTILITY OR SUBSTRUCTURE WITHIN THE UNITS OF THIS PROJECT. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY THE LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTUTIES fBY POTHOLING OR OTTER MEANS). THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY UNDERGROUND SERMCE ALERT (811) 48 HOURS BUD E ANY EXCAVATION. S THESE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS WERE CREATED FROM DIGITIZED BASE INFORMATION PROVIDED BY THE CITY OF SANTA ALA. EXACT LAYOUTS OF ALL HARDSCAPE ELEMENTS MAY NEED TO BE MODIFIED AND SOME FIELD ADJUSTMENTS MAY BE NECESSARY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INCLUDE AS PART OF THE BID, TIME AND LABOR FOR ANY MODIFICATIONS NECESSARY E TO IMPLEMENT THE INTENT OF THE DRAWINGS. s g z E Underground Service Alert msund cvlmmlA eg TWO WORKING DAYS �� APPROVED BY BEFORE YOU DIG low. - CBIINeMeyouag. _ N � NOTICE TO CONTRACTOR P N DEPUTY PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR DATE RWYSUANT To ASSEMBLY BILL 4216 NO EXNK4nOV PERMIT X WATER RESOURCE LIMAGER 5 VAUO UNLESS THE GDNTRACTR CONTACTS AND OBTAINS m A 9G ALERT TICKET NUMBER. CALL 811 AT !EAST iM0 NRIfdVG DA Y5 AWR W GtlM CWG EXCAVA LION. FILE No.: REVISIONS REFERENCES �WDFEsv THEPsUmRHs°0ER °A� STREET IMPROVEMENTS Q0 P Y OF: 09 2023 NDMBER HATE IN T RTER SCHOOL i" EEWWEE°,'�°w„'m® DEGIGNED: WN DRAWN: iN CHECKED: AK J ^�^ x No. C74766 -x WN31RUCi LITY 601 N. F `'M4S6/ Ld}l[lt£IY'FT/' SANTA ANA 92703 4'. DED CIVIL FOR CMS°IRUCDON: PUBLIC WORKS AGENCY �0..CION COMPLETED: DECW EDNN GAMS CITY ENGINEER RCE ND.: 051505 CITY OF SANTA ANA SHEET 20F 3 BEGIN CONSTRUCTION 94+50 I END CONSIRUMON I 95+50 96+00 92 LEGEND: — — — — PROPERTY UNE W EXISTING WATER G EXISTING GAS UNE F EXISTING ELECTRCAL UNE TC EXISTING TELECOMMUNICATION UNE 90 —IRR— PROPOSED IRRIGARON — PROPOSED AC PAVEMENT GRIND AND OVERLAY 2' - 3' OF AC PAVEMENT 1 SURFACE ELEVATION/UBUIY ELEVATION 88 100.CO EXISTING SURFACE ELEVATION/UTIUIY ELEVATION 86 CONSTRUCTION NOTES: Oj CONSTRUCT COMMERCIAL DRIVEWAY APPROACH PER CITY STD. 1112. CASE I. O REMOVE EXISTING DRNEWAY APPROACH. TOP OF CURB PROFILE O CONSTRUCT KC SIDEWALK PER CITY STD. 1104. CASE 3, W=8'. HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1"=10' VERTICAL SCALE: 1"=1 ® GRIND AND OVERLAY OF 2' TO 3' OF AC PAVEMENT FROM EDGE OF WENCH UNTIE TO CURB LANE UNE. 84 96+50 5 2' WIDE TILL -DEPTH AD TRENCH. REPLACEMENT OF FULL -DEPTH AC O SECTION TO MATCH EXISTING AC SECTION. MUTY TRENCH PER CITY STD. 1150. O CONSTRUCT 1' WATER STANCE WITH 5/8' METER PER STANDARD E PUN NO. 1401 FOR IRRIGATION USE. WATER METER TO B INSTALLED 9 CITY FORCES AFTER SUBMISSION OF WATER METER APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF FEES. CONTACT THE WATER RESOURCES DIVISION AT 714-647-3320 FOR ASSISTANCE PAVEMENT E RESTORATION PER STANDARD PLAN NO. 1150. NOTE: E CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL EXISTING UTILITIES PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION FOR ANY INTERFERENCE OR CONFLICT WITH NEW UTILITIES. STATIONING NOTES: f _8+50 _ _ _ N. FNRIIEW ST. CENIERUNE 1CO+00.00 = CIVIC CENTER CFNTERUNE 10+00.00 PER R-03092 £ REFERENCE PLANS: F R-03002 STREET IMPROVEMENT PLANS 1-023-25 STREET IMPRON]AENT PLANS WATER ATLAS SHEET NO. F05 T T TR ii F-1 TS I REVISIONS I REFERENCES I. —0Rb, Ii11ErOWRN91G1 I II'll I No. C74766 - DP. 12/31/21 1�01121 \, APPROVED BY \J DEPUTY PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR DATE WATER RESOURCE MANAGER Underground Service Alert dSa .cMlfamN TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG low. PLAN CRB6MaATWaM. 6MN.+� SCALE, 1• - 1c,' NOTICE TO CONTRACTOR SCALE, 0 5 10' 2D' PURSUANT TO A65EMBLY RU 4216 NO EXCAM71M PERMIT IS YAW IMNESi THE CONIRACTOR COVTACTS AND OWNS A DIO ALERT RCRET NUMBER. CALL 611 AT !EAST TEND GRMXIC 6CN£ .WM0 DAYS MOR TO CM4ENCJNG EXCAVATION. STREET IMPROVEMENTS _lvlll+_ RTER SCHOOL 601 N.144,60202*ANTA ANA 92703 PUBLIC WORKS AGENCY CITY OF SANTA ANA SHEET 3 OF 3 Itl.l I EPWIN Em M4. City Council 26 — 48 1/16/2024 <p ' 0) I LUIIVIi� �� °'• ` ll11N ERAOLISHE�"\ 12Q1TMIT A \ f 10 sVA , s �� 9Y �Hq PARKING D \:�r. Lb III uuLL H i I I I I I I i ILDIN I 1 1 1 1 I I 1 Lu il� City Council 26 — 49 ILDIN I .WK b'-VI MON OF SHOWN M ------- AVObLISE (E) FIRE HYDRANT � E Pi6kwan dRb�L&PN - 1 /16/202 STUDIO W ARCHITECTS ru I�ev ui e treet, .774.2920 :0 yp 10 0 PLAN IK G5 -f 1 KI 11, �r r V ,/ 4 III IIIIIIIIII II II;IIIIIi �� � �� y III151 TO z r m zo r enr ar e IIII 111 IIlI1i11111 � � �` �� ��� • c o r s I'I'I III 11. I. 7d0efand roun eum erre°uire a.ty o IIII' t�C:� p 5 r h s a ,y I I I I I I I I I I 11�,i It E in o5um unit . III III I� y ` CaR ee,, paces 5 own In co um .ALL 'I I'I'111 III I'I IIIIi I'111111111'I'111'11111� � � HIK1A LA S �. II I;IlI11111, 11111111111i ILI I I I I I I I I I � CCK L L L°L L L L L L L L b LA�tDY s I — I 0 0 _ a I------------------------------, - I ND 4do, cn a FUUL 04WD: BLE TAAL K •. ������Q Vr 18 71 03 ------------ ----------------------- LNG \ k 3. \ 4. N. 5. VE At I t i tj ILDIN 7. ------------------ - -- - - ---- --------- ON OF , ggpp WfiN RRNOT SHOWN 9. SS� CATI TI sC 1u. I tt� IT: 1, L, L SHALL RDWAREAND SiILDIN ILDIN I i F#AE VED STREET r � o / o W E � L VJtU YIAY TURF-X- a zu _ 1I 1 1�-RGghe'� iICLE c — — MRTY ' ..... b City Council 26 — 50 ......... 3IThEGATE 2 STUDIO W ARCHITECTS 4. 4. N. 5 VE � T G / u �ZINE. ti. 7. Gt ON OF HEiFIEAbR�OT SHOWN � VSFOR nt g, A S. D TO IAND u iR li LY �Iz- LARDS. _ �3 L SHALL T yt� #situ I LL VER HARDWARE AND H. SES 1 \ -LOSING. `i RT�E TS r rctrvcn � �� \ :7 � � ®'•, r�.°sq,_ x A NA 7I1F PPBOVED STREET EM PI15NS. Q�IiC T j KING. ,, \` ,p/ dio• f >i.' , NHL l9 ��. '9�' QNCRE \ L ,', • \ 9 y \ KING aRw E x 5 l'tBSUR TURF -X- -k KHK��{rvii r iuoOQLID StMENT - --- PERTY. ___-' �Yv1�R��KCVIYE(iICLE \J sw.v7rs sw,sMff&\�T�NCATED KING i s \ v v I L,bwmiymmn r MgKOF L- -------------- \ \• � � S��ATCK � X S�UREO i _--------- �rLNT rA�J�in TAIL 1/A10.2. � 15��iYcffi1`IRb c VILDIN R�AV TO i ie�sn oaaaavr wM.n� I NE t. IV City Council 26 — 51 1/16/202 Ktt:.l V STUDIO W ARCHITECTS ru Ipev ui e treet, .774.2920 I , -- ---------- - -- I 54A Q�iVDE E jai tA " 77 W LJ �69- -- ---------- B2 City Council 26-52 VWI:LbNo(�%12) ... OR Vq� MNALL LNUMOR.1-HOUR ME v v STUDIO ARCHITECTS ev t ' R %reet, Aui e 1e1774.2920 0 0 10 0~ PLAN A i v v STU DIO W ARCHITECTS cu i�ev uite reet, .774.2920 :o a PLAN Itl.l I EPWIN Em M4. City Council 26 — 54 1/16/2024 ---------- �N CF ------ A: �p.n 10 O�2 row ----------- VgY" ftt7Y64ffF60LNCE �17'7 gw&,m� ln,�n-r4 p w �LNCE --------------------- 07.5 S. City Council 26-55 1/16/2024 STUDIO ARCHITECTS A&, ppGXy 's�Fi S{N_� U • H l M' 6 + U.U. x ....... .... ...... A nro� I 0 K' 1 i m4 H I i b �druxw ene[ nx • • •: v ry H2 a [, PULL �. w,Es ATI V, �}}lLU WALL .�a1K K1,a�,Q[°„tea. Nk II IR _,�.wsrs.o e..a w[[:n[u s.«[.. «a[s,.ro„o• ..,[a .... [aa ,..as w..ww,a«,a.... ss�w[a�.wo[o ,o ow �.*'d/ WNtlk:I I NS _ K / UC 1517I / VIIIV AI I. H To 6r ED 6 uJIM E�E SIUE ° �> L tJ: ' rvikii�rv,see�Hies�r+tu�Le 10 'AT H NrSEE`"B 1e-4*W ktL Y� IH. �P II II FI q �I�lit°t'H ncil 26 - 56 SEEDETAIU � �� l/ alm2 City Co STUDIO W ARCHITECTS ru i�ev ui e treet, 774.2920 :0 i0 S0 PLAN Itl,l I EtWIN P- v'� City Council 26 — 57 1/16/2024 Itl,l I EtWIN P- v'� City Council 26 — 58 1/16/2024 MANDATORY CALGREEN CHECKLIST Mµ M a BE Ix R 5NEOD ERCE m32 ro OW6: P a E TReN,G!'"'Y ARE IN 1. FOR "IN SUPPLIED I THE F— I III IS FORN OLD caurEA wixw roR � (3Dg) eoouses wu,rxTMiww 6xevu eP. . (STEA1 ARD 1 ERs WTIR ENE INPUT MORE nMN •u ze ;:_cons uvr�i x urv.11UND INTINIS EL, c T[sohxcs LL COS T NRTER BE w. HroE[rs) PornBLE wnrtR —IN ,t1E lEpi�ODD BY"ENTGODUR E 2. AND E"FRE D F T� D;WG� B �E0»�xNS ) —�''GO N`" THEJSTEG """ ""�'�o — IN T NE S.SD5.8. ET6 (TI—) - TARXCRUNIES R N" LF UvaTORv SiN1 WC. FEE WATM FMWTM RXPXIE FLOW RATES RRIEN --HE .8 [NM SI ON.v BIG AT 60 P511 G—NS/O, GW DN o W,. N WATM CONSMVATM RnN FLOW RATES PER III 111FORRIA SUBLUND CODE SECTOR GGOO.3 xu5 (EL E-.DM/WUL-MGUNT) 0.5/0 35 —, I PER PLu6x PLJWM Fll(T %S AND RXTURE Ff TMS REQUIRED S< x. M O x II ,IeE, 845.1 - �ANN NGCZATCAgllll aosETs uOILET5) TIRE" IENc?OI1Er P n N " zs1 �yz CS. e,s., - PF'(, NWA �" N „11 . -1211 As"(Porn ) - . PM (� s L/w,IN.i 'MGM L E A „z.188.'/GSA 8125.1 (,.O L) PERAEME A 112.1818125.1 FAU (5 Wlx)�MUM ROW RATE - t.5 QFM E A „2.m.t/CSA 8125.1 PLUMBING PIPE MATERIAL SCHEDULE qE I —I GRAWR GOPPEa 1/53• PER ,' WArtR TYPE 'X' RARD DRAWN COPPER. NGS. GC' 1/53' PER 1' SEMI AIDvfM NPf AloTow+ mmws a,xL oxFaa TOrD - Tx' ,/,• PER I. D DWv FIT"I S— CONFORM TO GPO AND SENTuE " PER I' NOOF DNAIN PER EEi'Buc ' MPE D mnNGs s1Riwr_3caxWIN, TO, CFO .71 1/,' PEN nwL B(ixiENoa,SELa EEL re� c sly a PaR"msre"�c L°"rofa TO CPC. 1/,. PER B RExrtI.) - tETxn[xE PC PIPE. 1/,' PER 15 TYPE l WD DR.WN COPPER 1/1 PER PIPE INSULATION THICKNESS III III CIII.IMA UNINUT CIF TABLE 12—A PLUMBING EQUPMENT SCHEDULE PLUMBING EQUPMENT SCHEDULE END WIPM M TRAP PLANER RESTROgAS MFae 2- - -GISTINGUNEN UNIT(IF APPMQABLE), PRCVTDE X/vat. NISX.W TURN N S AA,mCI T- -NI GNI PER Wv1UFACNRERs ON AIR I, PLUME BR-, _ METPULD. PEN MANY KRFER'S INSIRUGTION'S. PLUMBING FUCTURE SCHEDULE « s 1-1 aw q)5/.5/<•-v3'= Po gO85e6=.B0e,,, Na DOMB xPo� FRO. a;A�;TQ R"�LE NWLLM CENTERLINE .GE ENUOUIgo-roINT-oPflusE TUM.JS eSET (BAN[ TVPE. eDn) 0/a• — P: CAES CxiNA Rao+ Z u'ni�Toa �I ER Au. sui. 111 8165 NT BI ROOM S 3/,• 5/,• ,_,/ � G-�Bwe�� a � u� T�E,RUNDERROUNT IS TIRE n,. wNR NORMDEeL Ma Soup B1WNIrSs SIEELSIxgE —11E RGUR e MOR SHI 5/r B/," aE z<zTI 2111 11" DEEP F- MOUNT, MOUND NOR EMT N6aw WAIL MOUNTED MOP NNR RA 1— -UU. -ER SPOUT MD PDL NPOERnv MBaMe�E D7x LT�BOR. NOT gPIED GAILBNDED STEEL. 30 —GE ti IwA,,I ILUS�Is AIU UxlxusT Arvu NIIIxuS {N "E" rWI v1"""'a) EN- MEET THE ID RD PER SI NGEO IN -LE 5. 05.6. ELECTRIC WATER HEATER SCHEDULE SYMBOL GESCRUPTON (STORAGE US)«^� "EE" R M 5 e 1D 1 S 1 ME 1 1 zo GET 5 APPRONED FOR USE IN SGUNER1 ALFURNI. p PRON ME RATED M —E. ORER°oMMENOANDNS. SEE O R —11 n IRS p UL USTED ELECTRIC POINT —OF —USE WATER HEATER SCHEDULE IHI e _GL 63,0 ISt 3/PFACTo50 . City Council 26 - 59 FIXTURE DATA SEEMEN e(1) E Ox W . TOOI NN BE U ID OF III rtRO NCO e eROOM GINK I I.S , 1.1 1 IS ID ewA �µc�I.oxr z.S I.0 -- G a. . eFLOOR " 0 OLD END eNUEG. SUNNI -- -- --G DO oMGTIN -RE UNITS PER CG TME11 A N., o SD ER 'aDRE UNITS PER GPI TABLE WATER CALCULATIONS DOMESTIC COLD WATER PRESSURE CALCULATION DOMESTIC COLD WATER SIZING (AVG PSI / 100 Ff) 'NOTION LOSS 3.1 RSI PER IDO FT A AT 8 TIES xm1 [Cox1ACr] AT [gsTRx.P7, (E/B)1/NAND ON ISM L, WATER PRDISURf 5 [xI-LO) PSi. m R CN n 'IELD OUG ES EQT/ERGR TO STURT OF PRIO IlwOF PE 51 N5 WILL P1 IN- PRESSURE - 1/3' a6 P9 5/4' S 3.6 PETER INLET] [AT RLEn PM DEIITHG) 3 P5 GPM (EXISTING) 1/3" RESIDIUM. PRESSURE IT PRI IS "T DOMESTIC HOT WATER SIZING oss (1s' ..aee> s Ps manor LOCRY Loss x, " PER Tao rr w AT s'Ps srA EnRRQgRED AT ar.BRxlxc Etta21 [WP ER EK11 RE s Pu IRS TOTK 55TE1X PRESSURE LOSSES - 5,S PS, 1/3• (arRm GP PN') - 6 s S., 1. 15 (P mSEEDINI �ALRSYSTEM PRESSURE LOSSES - I I/,' 1-1/R' ER ShiFM (I65 1.5) (PRESSURES Alfa FORDIG) X ,DO R / (B.SPSI y,W / Ne) (DEIAOFED LE III OPE)sI Ptt/1. IT 5 1/1 I I" STUDIO W ARCHITECTS 132E]�Kri orn • i -7w Exhibit 7 - Environmental Analysis and Exemption CEQA Exemption 15183 — Environmental Documentation Date: December 5, 2023 Project: Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project To: City of Santa Ana CC: Vince Fregoso, Vista Charter Public Schools Ingrid Canedo, Vista Charter Public Schools From: Frances Yau, AICP, Michael Baker International Alan Ashimine, Michael Baker International The City of Santa Ana (City) has received a project application for the proposed Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project (project), located at 601 and 615 North Fairview Street, Santa Ana, Orange County, California (Assessor's Parcel Numbers [APN] 405- 241-04). As documented herein, the proposed project meets the conditions for a statutory exemption pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15183 (California Public Resources Code 21083.3) to allow for a streamlined environmental review process. 1. Project Background On April 19, 2022, the Santa Ana City Council adopted the Golden City Beyond (General Plan Update) and certified the Santa Ana General Plan Update Final Recirculated Program Environmental Impact Report (GPU EIR), dated October 2021. The General Plan Update provides long-term policy direction to guide the physical development, quality of life, economic health, and sustainability of the City through 2045. The General Plan Update consists of the following 12 elements: Community, Economic Prosperity, Mobility, Public Services, Conservation, Noise, Open Space, Safety, Land Use, Historic Preservation, Housing, and Urban Design. According to the GPU EIR, the full buildout of the General Plan Update (year 2045) would result in a net increase of 96,855 person, 36,261 housing units, 5,849,220 nonresidential square footage, and 11,436 jobs as compared to existing conditions in 2019. The GPU EIR was prepared pursuant to Section 15168 of the CEQA Guidelines and allows analysis consistent with the high-level nature of the General Plan Update. The programmatic environmental document may be used to eliminate or reduce the scope of future environmental review for individual projects that are consistent with the General Plan Update pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 21083.3 and other streamlining provisions authorized by CEQA. Later projects implemented after the General Plan Update are examined with consideration of the GPU EIR to determine whether subsequent environmental analysis or documentation must be prepared. In addition, the CEQA Guidelines currently provide for streamlining through Section 15183, Projects Consistent with a Community Plan or Zoning, Section 15183.3, Streamlining for Infill Projects, and 15183.5, Tiering and Streamlining the Analysis of Greenhouse Gas Emissions. CEQA Guidelines Section 15183 allows a streamlined environmental review process for projects that are consistent with the densities established by existing zoning, community plan, or general plan policies for which an EIR was certified. Specifically, as set forth in CEQA Guidelines Section 15183(d), the 15183 exemption applies to projects which meet the following conditions: City Council 26 — 61 1/16/2024 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 (1) The project is consistent with: (A) A community plan adopted as part of a general plan, (B) A zoning action which zoned or designated the parcel on which the project would be located to accommodate a particular density of development, or (C) A general plan of a local agency, and (2) An EIR was certified by the lead agency for the zoning action, the community plan, or the general plan. Further, as set forth in CEQA Guidelines Section 15183(e), the 15183 exemption applies when all feasible mitigation measures identified in the applicable general plan are implemented by the public agency with jurisdiction to require such mitigation measures. As demonstrated throughout this memorandum, the project would qualify for streamlining of environmental review as a project consistent with a community plan or zoning under CEQA Guidelines Section 15183. 2. Project Description 2.1 Project Location The City is located in central Orange County, generally north of the San Diego Freeway (Interstate 405 [1-405]), south of the Garden Grove Freeway (State Route 22 [SR-22]), and west of the Costa Mesa Freeway (SR-55) and Interstate 5 (1-5). The City is approximately 30 miles southeast of downtown Los Angeles; refer to Exhibit 1, Regional Vicinity. Santa Ana is surrounded by the cities of Orange and Garden Grove to the north, Tustin to the east, Costa Mesa and Irvine to the south, and Fountain Valley and Westminster to the west. The generally north -south trending Santa Ana River traverses the western portion of the City. The approximately 0.9-acre project site is located at 601 and 615 North Fairview Street within the western portion of Santa Ana; refer to Exhibit 2, Site Vicinity. Regional access to the project site is provided via SR-22 and 1-5. Local access to the site is provided via North Fairview Street and West 5th Street. 2.2 Existing Conditions The project site is located within the Fairview Business Park, a highly developed and urbanized area of Santa Ana. The Fairview Business Park is occupied by institutional uses (i.e., Vista Heritage Global Academy and Templo Calvario Church) as well as various commercial and office uses (i.e., Echo Entertainment Inc., Small Wonders Children Center, IPW Industries Inc, A-1 Automotive Core Supplier, La Perla Spice Co., Inc., and Thai Eats). As shown on Exhibit 2, the northern portion of the site consists of one existing approximately 5,837-square foot vacant building formerly occupied by auto repair businesses and associated surface parking along North Fairview Street. The southern portion of the site consists of a surface parking lot shared between Vista Heritage Global Academy and Templo Calvario Church. Minimal landscaping is present on -site; no trees are present within the project boundaries. The site is accessible from North Fairview Street via two driveways to the west, and two alleys connecting to West 5th Street to the south and southeast. Dec i y ounci1 26 — 62 1/16/20 ge 2 I 395 Palmdale _ Adelanto i Apple Valley Victorville i i i Hesperia i S A N B E R N A R D I N I C O U N T Y LOS A N G ELES I Lake' C O U N T Y Arrowhead 1 San Fernando ®' Running © ® San Springs ® Burbank Rancho Bernardino Cucamonga © Pasadena � Glendora Fontana tpt Rialto Redlands — West Pomo a Ontario Covina Los Angeles Chino i Riverside ® Whittier ® r Yorba NN Moreno Be Linda Norco Valley © Fullerton I Corona Torrance ® R I V E R S I COUNT QGarden ® Perris Grove® © ORANGE Sun Santa Long C O U N T Y City Beach Ana Irvine Costa HuntingtonMesa ® ` Lake Beach / Elsinore _ Newport Project Beach Mission Viejo Murrieta Site Laguna Beach Laguna Niguel San luan / j Temecula Capistrano l�� \ Dana �r \ Point San 9 Clemente USMC I Fallbrook Camp Pendleton C, ti c o�, jJ VISTA CHARTER PUBLIC SCHOOLS DISTRICT OFFICE AND OUTDOOR SPACE PROJECT CEQA EXEMPTION 15183 NOT TO SCALE Reai�Vicinity N T E R N A T 0 VyAG o u n di.,,. 1N 196390 — `Y Exhibit 1 ► %� F ... tT s } _ - AA. . >� M. !, tiIF 0 PROJECT SITE dlim� Source: Google Earth Pro, June 2023 VISTA CHARTER PUBLIC SCHOOLS DISTRICT OFFICE AND OUTDOOR SPACE PROJECT CEQA EXEMPTION 15183 NOT TO SCALE Site Vicinity I N T E R N A T t3fly ftun�.2• 1N 196390 ` Exhibit 2 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 Surrounding uses adjacent to the project site include industrial, commercial, institutional, and residential uses. An existing railroad alignment (currently under construction for electric street cars) bounds the project site to the north and northeast, Vista Heritage Global Academy and office uses are located to the south (within the Fairview Business Center), and North Fairview Street bounds the site to the west and northwest. The Romero -Cruz Academy and Santa Ana River are located further west across North Fairview Street. 2.3 General Plan Designation and Zoning According to the General Plan Update Land Use Element Figure LU-1, Land Use Map, the project site is designated Industrial/Flex-Low (FLEX-1.5).' The Industrial/Flex designation is intended to provide context -appropriate development in areas with existing industrial uses. This land use designation allows for clean industrial uses that do not produce significant air pollutants, noise, or other nuisances typically associated with industrial uses, including office -industrial flex spaces, small-scale clean manufacturing, research and development and multilevel corporate offices, commercial retail, artist galleries, craft maker spaces, and live -work units. Adaptive reuse of buildings to accommodate live -work units is encouraged. Standalone residential is not permitted. According to the General Plan Update Land Use Element Table LU-3, Density and Intensity Standards, the FLEX-1.5 designation allows a maximum 1.5 floor -area -ratio (FAR) and/or 30 dwelling per acre, with a maximum building height of three stories. Based on the City of Santa Ana Zoning Map (Zoning Map), the site is zoned Light Industrial (M1) and Specific Development No. 82 (SD-82).2 According to Ordinance No. NS-2777, permitted uses in the SD-82 District are the uses permitted in the M1 zone as specified in Municipal Code Chapter 41, Article III, Division 18, M1 (Light Industrial) and schools by right and churches with a conditional use permit. Further, it is noted that the operational and development standards for the permitted and conditionally permitted Light Industrial Uses within the SD-82 zone shall be consistent with the operational and development standards found in Municipal Code Chapter 41, Article III, Division 18. 2.4 Project Characteristics The project proposes to remodel and reoccupy a building formerly occupied by an automotive repair use as an office building for Vista Charter Public Schools. Specifically, the existing 5,837- square foot building would be remodeled for use as Vista Charter Public Schools district office; refer to Exhibit 3, Conceptual Site Plan. The existing open floor plan would be redesigned to include offices and conference rooms, with the exterior enhanced with new materials and color palette. The remodeled building would have approximately 5,764 square feet of usable interior space. Approximately 10 existing administrative staff would relocate from other Vista Charter educational facilities to the proposed district office; the project would not result in any new jobs. The project would also redevelop the shared surface parking lot in the southern portion of the site into an outdoor area consisting of an approximately 2,297-square foot community garden, an approximately 7,372-square foot play field, and an approximately 4,640-square foot play yard; refer to Exhibit 3. Outdoor areas would serve administrative staff and existing students of the adjoining Vista Heritage Global Academy and would not increase existing school capacity. The community garden, play field, and play yard would not be for public use. City of Santa Ana, Golden City Beyond, Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Element, Figure LU-1, Land Use Map, April 2022. 2 City of Santa Ana, City of Santa Ana Zoning Map, March 4, 2021. Dec i y ouncil 26 — 65 1/16/20 ge 5 -------- ________ ________ / s _ ____----------------------------------------------- �Ck .. 10I 'A7 -rrrrrrrrrrrr q�� �� IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII Illlllllllllli i� � F G[ R IIIIIIIIIIIII y+ U 9C C A_ IIIIIIIIIIIII I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Q� TID Eos UIIDINIY^ l l_lel�l l l l l l i GPRDENE PARCEL zzsi sr� easel n IEleowaos.m. onovovF __ll _ VB•96 B 394.19'(MI 11 IEII 1 Ill 589. 9'26 E '38C.19' R)� .,'IIII ';III IIIII IIIII III III I I I III IRI—SIF 1 •.I I' } PROJECT SITE P aA6Co sfD (E)BUILDING -•111 III II I o DROP EE r ® (E)VISiAGLOBPLACADEMIES 81 SF I PARCELI 5 PARCEL 3 I I ® ® UBE HEGHUCAT�ON SS I I IEI BUILDING (E)BUILDING — 1 I I I 1 1 190 11 W 5TH ST Source: Studio W Architect%June 2023 VISTA CHARTER PUBLIC SCHOOLS DISTRICT OFFICE AND OUTDOOR SPACE PROJECT CEQA EXEMPTION 15183 INTERNATIONAL Council 26 — 66 1/16/ Teptual Site Plan 10=3 IN199999 Exhibit 3 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 Ancillary improvements include landscaping, fencing along the perimeters of the proposed outdoor areas, and expansion of the existing parking lot. The front parking lot facing North Fairview Street would provide 20 parking spaces and the side parking lot adjacent to an existing railroad alignment (currently under construction for electric street cars) would provide 43 spaces. In total, the site would provide 63 parking spaces. Similar to existing conditions, the site is accessible from North Fairview Street via two driveways to the west, and two alleys connecting to West 5th Street to the south and southeast. Internal drive aisles would provide access to the proposed office building and outdoor areas. The student drop-off and pick-up area and internal circulation pattern would be slightly modified to accommodate the outdoor learning garden space and the outdoor play areas. Specifically, the fenced play yard would have a dual use. During drop-off and pick-up hours, the fence would be opened to allow for vehicles to use as a drop-off/pick-up turnaround area; no play yard activities would occur during these times. During school hours, the play yard fence would be closed for safety and students would be able to utilize the play yard for school activities.; refer to Exhibit 3. 2.4.1 Entitlements To allow the use of the former automotive repair building for the proposed office use, a Zone Change would be required to modify the existing Light Industrial (M 1) zoning for the site to Specific Development No. 82 (SD-82) to be consistent with the majority of the Fairview Business Park. In addition to the proposed Zone Change, the project also proposes a Zoning Ordinance Amendment to amend the operational standards of the SD-82 zoning district to allow an outdoor play area. Under current SD-82 provisions, play areas for children are limited to indoors only. 2.4.2 Project Construction Construction of the proposed project is anticipated to take approximately eight months to complete. The construction activities would include building construction, paving, and architectural coating. Construction activities would comply with the City's Noise Ordinance, Section 18-314(e) of the Santa Ana Municipal Code (Municipal Code) and occur only Monday through Saturday between 7:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. Construction equipment and materials staging would occur within the project site. During construction, vehicular access would be provided via existing access points along North Fairview Street and/or West 5th Street. 3. California Environmental Quality Act Regulatory Setting CEQA applies to proposed projects initiated by, funded by, or requiring discretionary approvals from State or local government agencies. CEQA Guidelines apply generally to discretionary actions by agencies which may have a significant effect on the environment. However, where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that an activity may have a significant effect on the environment, and if the activity meets the conditions for a CEQA Exemption, it is considered exempt from the provisions of CEQA. CEQA Guidelines Section 15183 allows a streamlined environmental review process for projects that are consistent with the densities established by existing zoning, community plan, or general plan policies for which an EIR was certified and does not require additional environmental review, except as might be necessary to examine whether there are project -specific significant effects which are peculiar to the project or its site. Projects that are consistent with the densities and use characteristics considered by the GPU E I R may qualify for the CEQA Guidelines Section 15183 Exemption process. This exemption process may be used when a project meets the following conditions: Dec i y ouncil 26 — 67 1/16/20 ge 7 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 a) The project is consistent with the development density established by existing zoning, community plan or general plan policies for which an EIR was certified. b) There are no project specific effects which are peculiar to the project or its site. c) There are no project specific impacts which the prior EIR failed to analyze as significant effects. d) There are no potentially significant off -site and/or cumulative impacts which the prior EIR failed to evaluate. e) There is no substantial new information which results in more severe impacts than anticipated by the prior EIR. It is the intention of the City to pursue an exemption for the proposed project. The environmental review contained in Section 4 has been prepared to assess the potential for the proposed project to result in environmental effects and whether the proposed project qualifies for an exemption under CEQA Guidelines Section 15183. The previously certified GPU EIR serves as the primary environmental compliance document for the project, and the text, standards of conditions, and applicable mitigation measures are incorporated by reference. Per the CEQA Guidelines, the exemption does not need to be circulated for public review but can be included in the staff report prior to making a decision on the project. 4. Environmental Review This section includes an assessment, by issue area, of the proposed project's potential effects on the environment. 4.1 Aesthetics 4.1.1 GPU EIR Findings The GPU EIR concluded that while buildout of the General Plan Update would result in greater density and intensity in the five focus areas, aesthetic impacts would be less than significant with implementation of GPU EIR Regulatory Requirements (RR) AE-1 through AE-3. RR AE-1 requires the City to enforce adherence with the California Building Code, including provisions of the Building Energy Efficiency Standards related to lighting. RR AE-2 requires the City to enforce development standards and other general provisions as detailed in the Zoning Code (Municipal Code Chapter 41, Zoning) to ensure consistency between the General Plan and proposed development projects. Last, RR AE-3 requires the City to enforce the development standards and guidelines of adopted specific plans. The GPU EIR also states that visual resources in the City include views from public places of the Santiago Creek along the northern portion of the City and the Santa Ana River along the western portion of the City. There are no State -designated scenic highways in Santa Ana. 4.1.2 Project Analysis The project site is located along North Fairview Street and is currently developed with one existing building formerly occupied by automobile repair businesses and associated surface parking. Due to intervening topography and ornamental vegetation, the Santa Ana River and Santiago Creek are not visible from the project site. The proposed project would renovate a former automotive repair building as the Vista Charter Public Schools district office. Although the proposed project Dec i y ouncil 26 — 68 1/16/20 9e 8 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 would require a Zone Change to modify the site's M1 zoning to SD-82, it would make the site's zoning consistent with the rest of the Fairview Business Park. Additionally, no change in density or building height is proposed. Thus, the proposed project would be consistent with the allowed development density for the site's FLEX-1.5 land use designation established by the General Plan Update and would have similar or lesser significant impacts than those analyzed in the GPU EIR. Furthermore, development would be required to comply with existing standards governing aesthetics for the SD-82 zone, which is consistent with the standards for M1 uses in Municipal Code Chapter 41, Article 111, Division 18. Overall, the project would renovate an unused, vacant automobile repair building as a school district office and provide outdoor areas with a community garden and play areas. Thus, the project would improve the aesthetic character of the project site and complement the existing development in the Fairview Business Park. Therefore, the proposed project would not have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista, damage scenic resources within a State -designated scenic highway, or conflict with existing policies governing scenic quality. Moreover, to further reduce impacts associated with the proposed project, implementation of RR AE-1 would ensure compliance with the California Building Code, including provisions of the Building Energy Efficiency Standards related to lighting and adherence to applicable development standards in the Zoning Code. Additionally, the proposed project would comply with existing outdoor lighting standards for nonresidential buildings in Municipal Code Section 8-211, Special commercial building provisions, which require lighting to be contained on -site. Proposed nighttime lighting on -site for the outdoor areas would be limited to security lighting (i.e., no field lights that could impact neighboring uses at night). Therefore, impacts related to nighttime lighting and glare would be less than significant. 4.1.3 Conclusion As such, the project is consistent with the General Plan Update. With implementation of RR AE- 1 and AE-2 identified in the GPU EIR, the proposed project would not have any specific effects which are peculiar to the project or the site. There are no project -specific impacts or potentially significant off -site or cumulative impacts the GPU EIR failed to analyze, and there are no new significant or substantially more severe aesthetic impacts than anticipated by the GPU EIR. Applicable GPU EIR Regulatory Requirements/Mitigation Measures: RR AE-1 The City shall enforce adherence with the California Building Code, including provisions of the Building Energy Efficiency Standards related to lighting. RR AE-2 The City shall enforce development standards and other general provisions as detailed in the Zoning Code (Chapter 41 of the Municipal Code) to ensure consistency between the City's General Plan and proposed development projects. This includes compliance with the requirements of any ordinance adopting specific development plans. 4.2 Agriculture and Forestry Resources 4.2.1 GPU EIR Findings Most of the City, including the project site, is urbanized, developed, and does not provide opportunities for agricultural or forestry use. As stated in the GPU EIR, the City is nearly built out and does not contain any significant agricultural resources or land designated or zoned for agricultural use. Dec i y ounci1 26 — 69 1/16/20 9e 9 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 4.2.2 Project Analysis The project site is fully developed and consists of a building formerly utilized by automobile repair businesses and a surface parking area within the Fairview Business Park. The project does not involve any land use changes related to agriculture, forest land, or timberland production. The project site and surrounding area are not designated as Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance, and do not include lands that qualify as forest land or timberland.3 Additionally, there are no lands in the City under a Williamson Act contract.4 Therefore, no impact to agricultural and forestry resources would occur. 4.2.3 Conclusion Overall, the project is consistent with the General Plan Update, and would not have any specific effects which are peculiar to the project or the site. There are no project -specific impacts or potentially significant off -site or cumulative impacts the GPU EIR failed to analyze, and there are no new significant or substantially more severe impacts to agriculture and forestry resources than anticipated by the GPU EIR. Applicable GPU EIR Regulatory Requirements/Mitigation Measures: No GPU EIR regulatory requirements or mitigation measures apply. 4.3 Air Quality 4.3.1 GPU EIR Findings The GPU EIR determined that the General Plan Update is inconsistent with the Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) because buildout under the General Plan Update would exceed the population estimates assumed for the AQMP and would cumulatively contribute to the nonattainment designations of the South Coast Air Basin (Basin). The GPU EIR included Mitigation Measure AQ-2, which would reduce criteria air pollutant emissions from operational - related activities to the extent feasible; however, due to the magnitude and scale of the land uses that would be developed, no mitigation measures are available that would reduce operation and construction impacts below South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) thresholds. Therefore, the GPU EIR determined that impacts related to AQMP consistency and air quality emissions would remain significant and unavoidable. The GPU EIR also determined that construction activities associated with buildout of the GPU could generate short-term emissions that exceed the SCAQMD significance thresholds and cumulatively contribute to the nonattainment designations of the Basin. Implementation of Mitigation Measure AQ-1 would reduce criteria air pollutant emissions from construction -related activities to the extent feasible. However, the GPU EIR determined that construction time frames and equipment for site -specific development projects have a potential for multiple development projects to be constructed at one time, resulting in significant construction -related emissions. Thus, impacts were determined to be significant and unavoidable. California Department of Conservation, California Important Farmland Finder, https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/DLRP/CIFF/, accessed June 29, 2023. a California Department of Conservation, California Williamson Act Enrollment Finder, https://gis.conservation.ca.gov/portal/home/webmap/viewer. htmI?webmap=18f7488cOa9d4d299f5e9c33b3l 2f3l 2, accessed July 26, 2023. Dec I y ouncil 26 — 70 1/16/202 e 10 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 4.3.2 Project Analysis The following section evaluates the potential short- and long-term air quality impacts that would result from the construction and operation of the proposed project. The analysis is primarily based upon Attachment A, Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas/Energy Modeling Results. CONSISTENCY WITH APPLICABLE AIR QUALITY PLAN In order to reduce emissions in the Basin, the SCAQMD adopted the 2022 Air Quality Management Plan (2022 AQMP) which establishes a program of rules and regulations directed at reducing air pollutant emissions and achieving State and Federal air quality standards. The AQMP is a regional and multi -agency effort including the SCAQMD, California Air Resources Board (CARB), the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The 2022 AQMP pollutant control strategies are based on the latest scientific and technical information and planning assumptions, including the 2020-2045 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (2020-2045 RTP/SCS), updated emission inventory methodologies for various source categories, and SCAG's latest growth forecasts. SCAG's latest growth forecasts were defined in consultation with local governments and with reference to local general plans. The SCAQMD considers projects that are consistent with the AQMP, which is intended to bring the Basin into attainment for all criteria pollutants, to also have less than significant cumulative impacts. Criteria for determining consistency with the AQMP are defined by the following indicators: Criterion 1: With respect to the first criterion, SCAQMD methodologies require that an air quality analysis for a project include forecasts of project emissions in relation to contributing to air quality violations and delay of attainment. i) Would the project result in an increase in the frequency or severity of existing air quality violations? Since the consistency criteria identified under the first criterion pertains to pollutant concentrations, rather than to total regional emissions, an analysis of the project's pollutant emissions relative to localized pollutant concentrations is used as the basis for evaluating project consistency. As discussed below, localized concentrations of carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen oxides (NOx), particulate matter less than 10 microns in diameter (PM,o), and particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in diameter (PM2.5) would be less than significant during project construction and operations. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in an increase in the frequency or severity of existing air quality violations.5 5 Because reactive organic gases (ROGs) are not a criteria pollutant, there is no ambient standard or localized threshold for ROGs. Due to the role ROG plays in ozone formation, it is classified as a precursor pollutant and only a reaional emissions threshold has been established. Dec I y ouncil 26 — 71 1/16/202 e 11 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 ii) Would the project cause or contribute to new air quality violations? As discussed below, the proposed project would result in emissions that are below the SCAQMD thresholds. Therefore, the project would not have the potential to cause or affect a violation of the ambient air quality standards. iii) Would the project delay timely attainment of air quality standards or the interim emissions reductions specified in the AQMP? The proposed project would result in less than significant impacts regarding regional and localized concentrations during project construction and operations As such, the project would not delay the timely attainment of air quality standards or 2022 AQMP emissions reductions. Criterion 2: With respect to the second criterion for determining consistency with SCAQMD and SCAG air quality policies, it is important to recognize that air quality planning within the Basin focuses on attainment of ambient air quality standards at the earliest feasible date. Projections for achieving air quality goals are based on assumptions regarding population, housing, and growth trends. Thus, the SCAQMD's second criterion for determining project consistency focuses on whether the proposed project exceeds the assumptions utilized in preparing the forecasts presented in the 2022 AQMP. Determining whether a project exceeds the assumptions reflected in the 2022 AQMP involves the evaluation of the three criteria outlined below. The following discussion provides an analysis of each of these criteria. i) Would the project be consistent with the population, housing, and employment growth projections utilized in the preparation of the AQMP? Growth projections included in the 2022 AQMP form the basis for the projections of air pollutant emissions and are based on general plan land use designations and SCAG's 2020-2045 RTP/SCS demographics forecasts. The population, housing, and employment forecasts within the 2020-2045 RTP/SCS are based on local general plans as well as input from local governments, such as the City. The SCAQMD has incorporated these same demographic growth forecasts for various socioeconomic categories (e.g., population, housing, employment) into the 2022 AQMP. The project site is designated FLEX-1.5 and is zoned M1 and SD-82 zones. The FLEX- 1.5 designation allows for various office uses, a maximum FAR of 1.5 and a maximum building height of three stories. The proposed project would renovate an existing 5,837- square foot building as an office building for Vista Charter Public Schools. The building is located on a 0.9-acre (39,204 square -foot) site, thus providing an FAR of 0.15. The existing building height would remain the same at 19 feet and four inches. As such, the project would meet the design standards of the FLEX-1.5 designation. Permitted uses in the SD-82 zone are the uses permitted in the M1 zone as specified in Municipal Code Chapter 41, Article III, Division 18, M1 (Light Industrial), and schools by right and churches with a conditional use permit. Further, it is noted that the operational and development standards for the permitted and conditionally permitted Light Industrial Uses within the SD-82 zone shall be consistent with the operational and development standards found in Municipal Code Chapter 41, Article III, Division 18. To allow the use of the former automotive repair building for the proposed office use, a Zone Change would Dec i y ouncil 26 — 72 1/16/202 e 12 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 be required to modify the existing M1 zone to SD-82 to be consistent with the majority of the Fairview Business Park. In addition to the proposed Zone Change, the project also proposes a Zoning Ordinance Amendment to amend the operational standards of the SD- 82 zoning district to allow outdoor play areas. The project would also redevelop the shared surface parking lot in the southern portion of the site into an outdoor area consisting of an approximately 2,297-square foot community garden, an approximately 7,372-square foot play field, and an approximately 4,640-square foot play yard. Under current SD-82 provisions, play areas for children are limited to indoors only. Upon approval of the above entitlements, the proposed project would be consistent with the requirements of the General Plan Update and project site's zoning, and would not conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect. Impacts would be less than significant. The project proposes to remodel and reoccupy a building formerly occupied by an automotive repair use as an office building for Vista Charter Public Schools. As discussed in Section 4.14, Population and Housing, Vista Charter Public Schools operates six public charter schools in Los Angeles and Orange County and serves a total of 1,500 students. The proposed project creates an opportunity to have a district office located next to the organization's largest school, Vista Heritage Global Academy. However, it is anticipated that the project would not generate new employment opportunities within the existing organization. Additionally, proposed outdoor areas would serve existing students of the adjoining Vista Heritage Global Academy and would not increase existing school capacity. As a result, the proposed project would not directly or indirectly result in substantial unplanned population growth in the area or displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing. Additionally, as the SCAQMD has incorporated these same projections into the 2022 AQMP, it can be concluded that the proposed project would be consistent with the projections included in the 2022 AQMP. A less than significant impact would occur in this regard. ii) Would the project implement all feasible air quality mitigation measures? The proposed project would result in less than significant air quality impacts. Compliance with all feasible emission reduction rules and measures identified by the SCAQMD would be required as identified in RR AQ-2 and AQ-3 below. As such, the proposed project meets this 2022 AQMP consistency criterion. iii) Would the project be consistent with the land use planning strategies set forth in the AQMP? Land use planning strategies set forth in the 2022 AQMP are primarily based on the 2020- 2045 RTP/SCS. There is an existing bus stop located less than one mile to the west of the project site operated by Orange County Transportation Authority. Further, the project would provide bicycle parking and encourage alternate mode of transportation. Therefore, the project would be consistent with the actions and strategies of the 2020-2045 RTP/SCS As such, the proposed project meets this AQMP consistency criterion. In conclusion, the determination of 2022 AQMP consistency is primarily concerned with the long- term influence of a project on air quality in the Basin. The proposed project would not result in a long-term impact on the region's ability to meet State and Federal air quality standards. Further, the proposed project's long-term influence on air quality in the Basin would also be consistent with the SCAQMD and SCAG's goals and policies and is considered consistent with the 2022 AQMP. Dec i y ouncil 26 — 73 1/16/20'2 e 13 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 CRITERIA AIR POLLUTANTS Construction Impacts The project proposes to remodel and reoccupy an existing building to use as an office building for Vista Charter Public Schools and is not expected to involve any major construction activities. The project would be constructed over approximately eight months. Earthwork would be balanced on - site and would not require soil import or export. Exhaust emission factors for typical diesel - powered heavy equipment are based on the California Emissions Estimator Model version 2022.1 (CaIEEMod) program defaults. Variables factored into estimating the total construction emissions include the level of activity, length of construction period, number of pieces and types of equipment in use, site characteristics, weather conditions, number of construction personnel, and the amount of materials to be transported on- or off -site. The analysis of daily construction emissions has been prepared utilizing CaIEEMod. Refer to Attachment A for the CaIEEMod outputs and results. Fugitive dust emissions are associated with land clearing, ground excavation, cut -and -fill, and truck travel on unpaved roadways (including demolition as well as construction activities). Exhaust emissions from construction activities include emissions associated with the transport of machinery and supplies to and from the project site, employee commutes to the project site, emissions produced on -site as the equipment is used, and emissions from trucks transporting materials to/from the site. In addition to gaseous and particulate emissions, the application of asphalt and surface coatings creates ROG emissions, which are 03 precursors. Table 1, Proiect-Generated Construction Emissions, presents the anticipated daily short-term construction emissions. Table 1 Project -Generated Construction Emissions Emissions Source Pollutant (poundslda#,' ROG NOx c0 S02 PM10 Year 1 Construction Emissions2 0.59 5.98 7.14 0.01 0.32 0.27 Year 2 Construction Emissions2 0.89 5.65 7.11 0.01 0.44 0.25 Maximum Daily Emissions 0.89 5.98 7.14 0.01 0.44 0.27 SCAQMD Regional Thresholds 75 100 550 150 150 55 Threshold Exceeded? No No No No No No Notes: 1. Emissions were calculated using CaIEEMod version 2022.1. 2. Modeling assumptions include compliance with SCAQMD Rule 403 which requires: properly maintain mobile and other construction equipment; replace ground cover in disturbed areas quickly; water exposed surfaces three times daily; cover stockpiles with tarps; water all haul roads twice daily; and limit speeds on unpaved roads to 15 miles per hour. Source: Refer to Attachment A for assumptions used in this analysis. Construction Emissions Conclusion With the implementation of RR AQ-2 and AQ-3, criteria pollutant emissions during construction of the proposed project would not exceed the SCAQMD significance thresholds; refer to Table 1. Thus, total construction related air emissions would be less than significant. Operational Impacts Long-term operational air quality impacts consist of mobile source emissions generated from project -related traffic and emissions from stationary area and energy sources. It should be noted that emission reductions from the existing uses are not taken into account as they are currently vacant. Area source emissions include those generated by architectural coatings, consumer Dec i y ouncil 26 — 74 1/16/20'2 e 14 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 products, and landscape maintenance equipment associated with the development of the proposed project. Energy source emissions would be generated as a result of electricity and natural gas usage associated with the proposed project. Mobile sources are emissions from motor vehicles, including tailpipe and evaporative emissions. Emissions associated with each source are detailed in Table 2, Project -Generated Operational Emissions. Table 2 Project -Generated Operational Emissions Emissions Source Pollutant (pounds/day)' ROG NOx CO SOx PM,o PMz.s Project Summer Emissions Area 0.22 <0.01 0.30 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 Energy <0.01 0.05 0.04 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 Mobile 0.27 0.18 1.95 <0.01 0.41 0.11 Total Summer Emissions2 0.49 0.23 2.30 <0.01 0.41 0.11 SCAQMD Regional Threshold 55 55 550 150 150 55 Threshold Exceeded? No No No No No No Project Winter Emissions Area 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Energy <0.01 0.05 0.04 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 Mobile 0.27 0.20 1.85 <0.01 0.41 0.11 Total Winter Emissions2 0.44 0.24 1.89 <0.01 0.41 0.11 SCAQMD Regional Threshold 55 55 550 150 150 55 Threshold Exceeded? No No No No No No Notes: 1. Emissions were calculated using CalEEMod version 2022.1 and are based on 7,000 square feet building area as a conservative analysis. 2. The numbers may be slightly off due to rounding. Source: Refer to Attachment A for assumptions used in this analysis. As shown in Table 2, the total operational emissions for both summer and winter would not exceed established SCAQMD thresholds. Therefore, impacts in this regard would be less than significant. Air Quality Health Impacts Adverse health effects induced by criteria pollutant emissions are highly dependent on a multitude of interconnected variables (e.g., cumulative concentrations, local meteorology and atmospheric conditions, and the number and character of exposed individual [e.g., age, gender]). In particular, 03 precursors, VOCs, and NOx, affect air quality on a regional scale. Health effects related to 03 are therefore the product of emissions generated by numerous sources throughout a region. Existing models have limited sensitivity to small changes in criteria pollutant concentrations, and, as such, translating project -generated criteria pollutants to specific health effects or additional days of nonattainment would produce meaningless results. In other words, the project's less than significant increases in regional air pollution from criteria air pollutants would have nominal or negligible impacts on human health. As noted in the Brief of Amicus Curiae by the SCAQMD (April 6, 2015) for Sierra Club vs. County of Fresno, the SCAQMD acknowledged it would be extremely difficult, if not impossible to quantify health impacts of criteria pollutants for various reasons including modeling limitations as well as where in the atmosphere air pollutants interact and form. Further, as noted in the Brief of Amicus Curiae by the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District (SJVAPCD) (April 13, 2015) for the Sierra Club vs. County of Fresno, SJVAPCD acknowledged that currently available modeling tools are not equipped to provide a meaningful analysis of the correlation between an individual development project's air emissions and specific human health impacts. Dec i y ouncil 26 - 75 1/16/20'2 e 15 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 The SCAQMD acknowledges that health effects quantification from 03, as an example, is correlated with the increases in ambient level of 03 in the air (concentration) that an individual person breathes. The SCAQMD's Brief of Amicus Curiae for Sierra Club vs. County of Fresno states that it would take a large amount of additional emissions to cause a modeled increase in ambient 03 levels over the entire region. The SCAQMD states that based on their own modeling in the SCAQMD's 2012 AQMP, a reduction of 432 tons (864,000 pounds) per day of NOx and a reduction of 187 tons (374,000 pounds) per day of VOCs would reduce 03 levels at highest monitored sites by only nine parts per billion. As such, the SCAQMD concludes that it is not currently possible to accurately quantify Os -related health impacts caused by NOx or VOC emissions from relatively small projects (defined as projects with regional scope) due to photochemistry and regional model limitations. Thus, as the project would not exceed SCAQMD thresholds for construction and operational air emissions, the project would have a less than significant impact for air quality health impacts. LOCALIZED POLLUTANTS AND SENSITIVE RECEPTORS Sensitive receptors are defined as facilities or land uses that include members of the population that are particularly sensitive to the effects of air pollutants, such as children, the elderly, and people with illnesses. Examples of these sensitive receptors are residences, schools, hospitals, and daycare centers. The CARB has identified the following groups of individuals as those most likely to be affected by air pollution: the elderly over 65, children under 14, athletes, and persons with cardiovascular and chronic respiratory diseases such as asthma, emphysema, and bronchitis. The closest sensitive receptor to the project site is the Vista Heritage Global Academy School adjacent to the south of the project site. The closest residential uses are located approximately 100 feet to the north of the project site and the existing Romero -Cruz Academy school is located approximately 100 feet to the west. Localized Significance Thresholds Localized Significance Thresholds (LSTs) were developed in response to SCAQMD Governing Boards' Environmental Justice Enhancement Initiative (1-4). The SCAQMD provided the Final Localized Significance Threshold Methodology (dated June 2003 [revised 2008]) for guidance. The LST methodology assists lead agencies in analyzing localized air quality impacts. The SCAQMD provides the LST lookup tables for one-, two-, and five -acre projects emitting CO, NOx, PM2.5, and/or PM1o. The LST methodology and associated mass rates are not designed to evaluate localized impacts from mobile sources traveling over the roadways. The project site is located within Source Receptor Area (SRA) 17, Central Orange County. Construction LST The SCAQMD guidance on applying CaIEEMod to LSTs specifies the number of acres a particular piece of equipment would likely disturb per day.6 SCAQMD provides LST thresholds for one-, two, and five -acre site disturbance areas; SCAQMD does not provide LST thresholds for projects over five acres. The project proposes to remodel and reoccupy a building formerly occupied by an automotive repair use as an office building for Vista Charter Public Schools and would not involve any grading or major construction related activities and therefore, there would not be any 6 The number of acres represent the total acres traversed by grading equipment. In order to properly grade a piece of land, multiple passes with equipment may be required. The disturbance acreage is based on the equipment list and days of the grading phase according to the anticipated maximum number of acres a given piece of equipment can pass over in an 8-hour workday. Dec I y ounci1 26 — 76 1/16/20'2 e 16 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 significant on -site localized construction emissions. As such the project's localized construction emissions would not exceed the LSTs for SRA 17 and localized significance impacts from project - related construction would be less than significant. Operational LST According to SCAQMD LST methodology, LSTs would apply to operational activities if the project includes stationary sources or attracts mobile sources that may spend extended periods queuing and idling at the site (i.e., warehouse or transfer facilities). The proposed project does not include such uses. Thus, due to the lack of such emissions, no long-term LST analysis is needed. Operational LST impacts would be less than significant in this regard. Carbon Monoxide Hotspots CO emissions are a function of vehicle idling time, meteorological conditions, and traffic flow. Under certain extreme meteorological conditions, CO concentrations near a congested roadway or intersection may reach unhealthful levels (e.g., adversely affecting residents, school children, hospital patients, and the elderly). The Basin is designated as an attainment/maintenance area for the Federal CO standards and an attainment area under State standards. There has been a decline in CO emissions even though vehicle miles traveled (VMT) on U.S. urban and rural roads have increased; estimated anthropogenic CO emissions have decreased 68 percent between 1990 and 2014. In 2014, mobile sources accounted for 82 percent of the nation's total anthropogenic CO emissions.' Three major control programs have contributed to the reduced per -vehicle CO emissions, including exhaust standards, cleaner burning fuels, and motor vehicle inspection/maintenance programs. According to the SCAQMD CEQA Air Quality Handbook, a potential CO hotspot may occur at any location where the background CO concentration already exceeds 9.0 parts per million (ppm), which is the 8-hour California ambient air quality standard. The closest monitoring station to the project site that monitors CO concentration is Anaheim — 812 West Vermont Street, which is located approximately 4.5 miles north of the project site. The maximum CO concentration at Anaheim — 812 West Vermont Street station was measured at 1.976 ppm in 2022.8 Given that the background CO concentration does not currently exceed 9.0 ppm, a CO hotspot would not occur at the project site. Therefore, CO hotspot impacts would be less than significant in this regard. Asbestos Asbestos is a term used for several types of naturally occurring fibrous minerals that are a human health hazard when airborne. The most common type of asbestos is chrysotile, but other types such as tremolite and actinolite are also found in California. Asbestos is classified as a known human carcinogen by State, Federal, and international agencies and was identified as a toxic air contaminant by CARB in 1986. Asbestos can be released from serpentinite and ultramafic rocks when the rock is broken or crushed. At the point of release, the asbestos fibers may become airborne, causing air quality and human health hazards. These rocks have been commonly used for unpaved gravel roads, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Carbon Monoxide Emissions, https://cfpub.epa.gov/roe/indicator pdf.cfm?i=10, accessed July 3, 2023. 8 California Air Resources Board, Air Quality and Meteorological Information, 4.3.3 https://www.arb.ca.gov/agmis2/agdselect.php?tab=specialrpt, accessed July 3, 2023. Dec I y ouncil 26 — 77 1/16/202 e 17 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 landscaping, fill projects, and other improvement projects in some localities. Asbestos may be released to the atmosphere due to vehicular traffic on unpaved roads, during grading for development projects, and at quarry operations. All of these activities may have the effect of releasing potentially harmful asbestos into the air. Natural weathering and erosion processes can act on asbestos bearing rock and make it easier for asbestos fibers to become airborne if such rock is disturbed. According to the Department of Conservation Division of Mines and Geology, A General Location Guide for Ultramafic Rocks in California — Areas More Likely to Contain Naturally Occurring Asbestos Report, serpentinite and ultramafic rocks are not known to occur within the project area.9 It is possible that the existing on -site structure contains asbestos. According to SCAQMD Rule 1403 requirements, prior to the start of demolition activities, the existing structure shall be thoroughly surveyed for the presence of asbestos by a person that is certified by Cal/OSHA for asbestos surveys. Rule 1403 requires that the SCAQMD be notified a minimum of 10 days before any demolition activities begin with specific details of all asbestos to be removed, start and completion dates of demolition, work practices and engineering controls to be used to contain the asbestos emissions, estimates on the amount of asbestos to be removed, the name of the waste disposal site where the asbestos will be taken, and names and addresses of all contractors and transporters that will be involved in the asbestos removal process. Therefore, through adherence to the asbestos removal requirements, detailed in SCAQMD Rule 1403, a less than significant asbestos impact would occur during construction of the proposed project. Health Risk Impacts of On -Site Sensitive Receptors The project site is located adjacent to an existing railroad and light industrial uses. Therefore, the proposed on -site outdoor play area could be exposed to potential health impacts. It should be noted that according to several court decisions, CEQA analysis is not required to analyze impacts of the existing environment on a proposed project unless the project risks exacerbating existing environmental hazards. As such, the following discussion on the health risk impacts of on -site sensitive receptors is for informational purposes only. The SCAQMD recommends that health risk assessments be conducted for substantial sources of diesel particulate emissions (e.g., truck idling and movements, ship hoteling at ports, and train idling) and has provided guidance for analyzing mobile source diesel emissions.10 Similarly, CARB requires a health risk assessment when siting new sensitive land uses within 1,000 feet of a major service and maintenance rail yard or within 1,000 feet of a distribution center that accommodates more than 100 trucks per day.11 It should be noted that emissions of diesel particulate matter from train idling occurs predominantly at railroad yards, train stations, and train stops. Most train idling emissions are concentrated at railroad yards, where switching engines and local yard service operations are performed. The proposed project is located next to a railroad and is not located in the vicinity of a railyard or a train station. The railroad is currently not operational and is being developed to build a fixed guideway system called the Orange County Streetcar (OC Streetcar). The proposed OC Streetcars would be electrically -powered and would not consume diesel and thus, would not generate diesel particulate matter. Furthermore, the light industrial uses located to the south of the project site are small warehouses that do not qualify as a distribution center, and only involve occasional delivery truck trips that are much less than 100 s California Department of Conservation Division of Mines and Geology, A General Location Guide for Ultramafic Rocks in California — Areas More Likely to Contain Naturally Occurring Asbestos Report, August 2000, https://ww3.arb.ca.gov/toxics/asbestos/ofr 2000-019.pdf, accessed April 3, 2023. 10 South Coast Air Quality Management District, Health Risk Assessment Guidance for Analyzing Cancer Risks from Mobile Source Diesel Emissions, December 2002. 11 California Air Resources Board, Air Quality and Land Use Handbook: A Community Health Perspective, April 2005. Dec I y ouncil 26 — 78 1/16/20'2 e 18 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 truck trips per day. Therefore, diesel particulate matter emissions generated by the light industrial uses to the south are nominal and would not cause significant health impacts to on -site sensitive receptors (i.e., proposed outdoor play area). As such, on -site sensitive receptors would have less than significant health impacts from the future operations of the OC Streetcar and the existing operations of adjacent light industrial uses, and potential health risk from the future OC Streetcar and existing light industrial uses on on -site sensitive receptors was not quantified. A less than significant impact would occur in this regard. OBJECTIONABLE ODORS According to the SCAQMD CEQA Air Quality Handbook, land uses associated with odor complaints typically include agricultural uses, wastewater treatment plants, food processing plants, chemical plants, composting, refineries, landfills, dairies, and fiberglass molding. The proposed project does not include any uses identified by the SCAQMD as being associated with odors. Construction activities associated with the project may generate detectable odors from heavy- duty equipment exhaust and architectural coatings. However, construction -related odors would be short-term in nature and cease upon project completion. In addition, the project would be required to comply with the California Code of Regulations, Title 13, Sections 2449(d)(3) and 2485, which minimize the idling time of construction equipment either by requiring equipment to be shut off when not in use or limiting idling time to no more than five minutes. Compliance with these existing regulations would further reduce the detectable odors from heavy-duty equipment exhaust. Project's compliance with RR AQ-3 would ensure compliance with the SCAQMD Regulation XI, Rule 1113 —Architectural Coating, which would minimize odor impacts from ROG emissions during architectural coating. Any odor impacts to existing adjacent land uses would be short-term and negligible. As such, the project would not result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people. Impacts would be less than significant in this regard. 4.3.3 Conclusion Overall, the project is consistent with the General Plan Update. With implementation of RR AQ-1 though AQ-3 identified in the GPU EIR, the proposed project would not have any specific effects which are peculiar to the project or the site. There are no project -specific impacts or potentially significant off -site or cumulative impacts the GPU EIR failed to analyze, and there are no new significant or substantially more severe air quality impacts than anticipated by the GPU EIR. Applicable GPU EIR Regulatory Requirements/Mitigation Measures: RR AQ-1 (amended) New buildings are required to achieve the current California Building Energy Efficiency Standards (Title 24, Part 6) and California Green Building Standards Code (CALGreen) (Title 24, Part 11). The 202249 Building Energy Efficiency Standards became effective January 1, 20220. The Building and Energy Efficiency Standards and CALGreen are updated tri-annually with a goal to achieve net zero buildings energy for 2030. RR AQ-2 Construction activities will be conducted in compliance with California Code of Regulations, Title 13, Section 2449, which requires that nonessential idling of construction equipment is restricted to five minutes or less. Dec i y ouncil 26 — 79 1/16/20'2 e 19 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 RR AQ-3 Construction activities will be conducted in compliance with any applicable South Coast Air Quality Management District rules and regulations, including but not limited to: • Rule 403, Fugitive Dust, for controlling fugitive dust and avoiding nuisance. Rule 402, Nuisance, which states that a project shall not "discharge from any source whatsoever such quantities of air contaminants or other material which cause injury, detriment, nuisance, or annoyance to any considerable number of persons or to the public, or which endanger the comfort, repose, health or safety of any such persons or the public, or which cause, or have a natural tendency to cause, injury or damage to business or property." Rule 1113, which limits the volatile organic compound content of architectural coatings. • Rule 1466, Soil Disturbance. Projects that involve earth -moving activities of more than 50 cubic yards of soil with applicable toxic air contaminants are subject to this rule. 4.4 Biological Resources 4.4.1 GPU EIR Findings According to the GPU EIR, the City is built out with primarily industrial, commercial, and residential uses. Wildlife habitats within the City are generally limited to open space/vacant parcels, the Santa Ana River, and the Santiago Creek. While no development or land use changes are proposed in the City's open space areas, sensitive species may still be present in Santa Ana and vegetation removal for redevelopment in the City could adversely impact special status species and/or migratory birds. Thus, Mitigation Measure BI0-1 would require screening by a qualified biologist to determine if a site -specific biological resources report is required for projects that disturb vegetated land or major streams. No land use changes are proposed on parcels identified with riparian habitat, sensitive natural communities, or wetlands. Additionally, the City is not within a Natural Community Conservation Plan/Habitat Conservation Plan (NCCP/HCP) area. Thus, the GPU EIR concluded that the General Plan Update would have no impact in those regards. 4.4.2 Project Analysis The project site is located within the General Plan Update West Santa Ana Boulevard Focus Area, which includes 28 open space designated parcels and zero vacant parcels. The project site is urbanized and fully disturbed/developed. The proposed project would renovate a former automotive repair building as the Vista Charter Public Schools district office and redevelop existing surface parking lots into an outdoor community garden, outdoor play field, and outdoor play yard. The project site does not include any wildlife or riparian habitat, sensitive natural communities, or wildlife corridors. Although the project site contains limited ornamental vegetation, the site does not include attributes that would be capable of supporting special status or sensitive plant species, or native resident or migratory species. Additionally, project compliance with RR B-2 would ensure any potential direct or indirect impacts to common bird species comply with California Fish and Game Code Section 3503, which prohibits the take, possession, or needless destruction of any bird's nest or eggs. Further, all proposed activities would occur within Dec i y ouncil 26 — 80 1/16/202 e 20 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 established urbanized areas and not include land uses or activities that would remove or impact any biological resources. No new or substantially more severe impacts would occur compared to the determination in the GPU EIR, and no new mitigation measures are required. As stated, the City is not within an NCCP/HCP area. Therefore, the proposed project would not conflict with an NCCP/HCP or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan. 4.4.3 Conclusion Overall, the project is consistent with the General Plan Update. With implementation of RR B-2 identified in the GPU EIR, the proposed project would not have any specific effects which are peculiar to the project or the site. There are no project -specific impacts or potentially significant off -site or cumulative impacts the GPU EIR failed to analyze, and there are no new significant or substantially more severe biological resource impacts than anticipated by the GPU EIR. Applicable GPU EIR Regulatory Requirements/Mitigation Measures: RR B-2 Regulatory requirement for potential direct/indirect impacts to common and sensitive bird and raptor species will require compliance with the California Fish and Game Code Section 3503. 4.5 Cultural Resources 4.5.1 GPU EIR Findings The GPU EIR concluded that future development under the General Plan Update could adversely impact the City's numerous historical properties listed in national, State, and local registers. However, impacts would be reduced to less than significant levels upon implementation of RR CUL-1 through CUL-6 and Mitigation Measures CUL-1 through CUL-7. Specifically, Mitigation Measure CUL-1 would require a historical resources assessment (HRA) for structures 45 years or older. Mitigation Measure CUL-2 would require the maximum use of the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties with Guidelines for Preserving, Rehabilitating, Restoring and Reconstructing Historic Buildings to ensure that projects involving relocation, conversion, rehabilitation, or alteration of a historic resources would not impair any historical significance. In the event that impacts to historical resources cannot be avoided, Mitigation Measure CUL-3 would require the affected historical resources to be thoroughly documented before issuance of any permits and may also require additional public education efforts and/or memorialization of the historical resource. To reduce impacts to archaeological resources and prior to ground -disturbing activities, Mitigation Measure CUL-4 requires an Archaeological Resources Assessment be conducted under the supervision of a qualitied archaeologist. If potentially significant archaeological resources are identified and impacts cannot be avoided, Mitigation Measure CUL-5 requires a Phase II Testing and Evaluation investigation be performed by a qualified archaeologist. If the Archaeological Resources Assessment does not identify archaeological resources but indicates the project area to be highly sensitive for archeological resources, a qualified archaeologist and a Native American monitor culturally affiliated with the project area must monitor all ground -disturbing activities in the areas of high archaeological sensitivity. Pursuant to Mitigation Measure CUL-7, if the Archaeological Resources Assessment does not identify potentially significant archaeological resources but the site has moderate sensitivity for archaeological resources, a qualified archaeologist must be retained on -call. Overall, implementation of regulatory requirements and Mitigation Measures CUL-1 through CUL-7 would reduce impacts to less than significant levels. Dec i y ouncil 26 — 81 1/16/20'2 e 21 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 4.5.2 Project Analysis The project site is located within the western portion of the West Santa Ana Boulevard Focus Area and does not contain any historical resources as defined by CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(a). Thus, no impacts would occur with regards to historical resources. Although the project would redevelop the shared surface parking lot in the southern portion of the site into an outdoor community garden, play field, and play yard, the proposed project would not require extensive excavation that could uncover previously undiscovered archaeological resources or disturb human remains. Typical excavation depth would be a maximum of four feet for the majority of the site with the deepest excavation of approximately eight feet for an underground infiltration chamber related to stormwater improvements. RR CUL-1 requires that if human remains are discovered within the project site, disturbance of the site must halt until the County coroner has investigated and recommended treatment and disposition of the remains. If the human remains are determined to be Native American in origin, the Native American Heritage Commission must be contacted. Upon implementation of RR CUL-1, impacts would be less than significant in these regards. No new or substantially more severe impacts would occur compared to the determinations of the GPU EIR, and no new mitigation measures are required. 4.5.3 Conclusion As such, the project is consistent with the General Plan Update. With implementation of RR CUL- 1, the proposed project would not have any specific effects which are peculiar to the project or the site. There are no project -specific impacts or potentially significant off -site or cumulative impacts the GPU EIR failed to analyze, and there are no new significant or substantially more severe cultural resource impacts than anticipated by the GPU EIR. Applicable GPU EIR Regulatory Requirements/Mitigation Measures: RR CUL-1 California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 requires that if human remains are discovered within the proposed project site, disturbance of the site shall halt and remain halted until the coroner has investigated the circumstances, manner, and cause of any death, and the recommendations concerning the treatment and disposition of the human remains have been made to the person responsible for the excavation, or to his or her authorized representative. If the coroner determines that the remains are not subject to his or her authority and if the coroner recognizes or has reason to believe the human remains to be those of a Native American, he or she shall contact, by telephone within 24 hours, the Native American Heritage Commission. 4.6 Energy 4.6.1 GPU EIR Findings The GPU EIR determined that implementation of the General Plan Update policies, in conjunction with regulatory requirements, would ensure that energy demand associated with growth under the General Plan Update would not be inefficient, wasteful, or unnecessary. Additionally, the General Plan Update would not conflict with or obstruct a State or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency. Dec i y ouncil 26 — 82 1/16/20'2 e 22 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 4.6.2 Project Analysis ENERGY CONSUMPTION Construction During construction, the project would consume energy in two general forms: (1) the fuel energy consumed by construction vehicles and equipment; and (2) bound energy in construction materials, such as asphalt, steel, concrete, pipes, and manufactured or processed materials such as lumber and glass. Fossil fuels used for construction vehicles and other energy -consuming equipment would be used during building construction, paving, and architectural coatings. Fuel energy consumed during construction would be temporary and would not represent a significant demand on energy resources. In addition, some incidental energy conservation would occur during construction through compliance with State and RR E-1 requirements that heavy-duty diesel equipment not in use for more than five minutes be turned off. Project construction equipment would also be required to comply with the latest U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and CARB engine emissions standards. These emissions standards require highly efficient combustion systems that maximize fuel efficiency and reduce unnecessary fuel consumption. Due to increasing transportation costs and fuel prices, contractors and owners have a strong financial incentive to avoid wasteful, inefficient, and unnecessary consumption of energy during construction. Substantial reductions in energy inputs for construction materials can be achieved by selecting green building materials composed of recycled materials that require less energy to produce than non -recycled materials.12 Compliance with RR E-2 and the integration of green building materials can help reduce environmental impacts associated with the extraction, transport, processing, fabrication, installation, reuse, recycling, and disposal of these building industry source materials.13 The project -related incremental increase in the use of energy bound in construction materials such as asphalt, steel, concrete, pipes and manufactured or processed materials (e.g., lumber and gas) would not substantially increase demand for energy compared to overall local and regional demand for construction materials. The project proposes to remodel and reoccupy an existing building to use as an office building for Vista Charter Public Schools and is not expected to involve any major construction activities or construction of new structures. As such, the project's fuel consumption from off -road construction equipment use would be nominal and would not significantly increase fuel use in the County. Similarly, the project's fuel consumption from on -road construction vehicle use would be nominal and would not significantly increase fuel use in the County. As such, construction would have a nominal effect on the local and regional energy supplies. It is noted that construction fuel use is temporary and would cease upon completion of construction activities. There are no unusual project characteristics that would necessitate the use of construction equipment that would be less energy efficient than at comparable construction sites in the region or State. Therefore, by complying with RR E-1 and E- 2, construction fuel consumption would not be any more inefficient, wasteful, or unnecessary than other similar development projects of this nature. As such, a less than significant impact would occur in this regard. 12 CalRecycle, Green Building Materials, https://www.calrecycle.ca.gov/greenbuiIding/materials#Material, accessed August 15, 2023. 13 Ibid. Dec i y ouncil 26 — 83 1/16/20'2 e 23 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 Operations Transportation Enerav Demand Pursuant to the federal Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975, the National Highway Traffic and Safety Administration is responsible for establishing additional vehicle standards and for revising existing standards. Compliance with federal fuel economy standards is not determined for each individual vehicle model. Rather, compliance is determined based on each manufacturer's average fuel economy for the portion of their vehicles produced for sale in the United States. According to the Vista Heritage Global Academy Expansion Trip Generation Assessment prepared by Urban Crossroads and dated July 24, 2023, the proposed project would generate 84 average daily trips without taking trip reductions from the existing uses as they are currently vacant. As such, with the 84 average daily trips, the project would have a nominal increase the County's automotive fuel consumption. The project does not propose any unusual features that would result in excessive long-term operational fuel consumption. The key drivers of transportation -related fuel consumption are commuting for work and many personal choices on when to drive to the site for various purposes. Those factors are outside of the scope of the design of the proposed project. However, the project would provide on -site bicycle parking and promote the use of alternate mode of transportation. Additionally, an Orange County Transportation Authority bus stop is located less than 0.1 miles to the west of the project site. As such, this project would encourage and support the use of alternative modes of transportation, thus reducing petroleum fuel consumption. Therefore, fuel consumption associated with vehicle trips generated by the project would not be considered inefficient, wasteful, or unnecessary in comparison to other similar developments in the region. A less than significant impact would occur in this regard. Building Energy Demand Compliance with RR E-3 and E-4 would ensure project's compliance with the most current version of the 2022 Title 24 Building Energy Efficiency Standards (commonly known as Title 24), which provide minimum efficiency standards related to various building features, including appliances, water and space heating and cooling equipment, building insulation and roofing, and lighting. Additionally, the project would exceed the 2022 Title 24 standards. Compliance with the current 2022 Title 24 standards significantly reduces energy usage. As modeled in CaIEEMod and detailed in Attachment A, the project would consume 124,742 kilowatt-hour of electricity and 177,425 kilo British thermal units of natural gas per year, which is nominal compared to regional energy consumption. It should be noted that as a conservative analysis, existing uses on -site were not modeled or deducted from project energy consumption. Furthermore, the electricity provider, SCE, is subject to California's Renewables Portfolio Standard (RPS). The RPS requires investor -owned utilities, electric service providers, and community choice aggregators to increase procurement from eligible renewable energy resources to 60 percent of total procurement by 2030, and 100 percent by 2045. Renewable energy is generally defined as energy that comes from resources which are naturally replenished within a human timescale such as sunlight, wind, tides, waves, and geothermal heat. The increase in reliance of such energy resources further ensures that new development projects will not result in the waste of the finite energy resources. Therefore, by using electricity from SCE, the project would be in compliance with RR E-5. As a result, the project would ensure energy consumption to be kept to a minimum through high efficiency lighting, energy efficient appliances, and on -site renewable energy production. Dec i y ouncil 26 — 84 1/16/202 e 24 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 Therefore, the project would not cause wasteful, inefficient, and unnecessary consumption of building energy during project operation, or preempt future energy development or future energy conservation. A less than significant impact would occur in this regard. CONSISTENCY WITH APPLICABLE ENERGY PLANS State and regional plans for renewable energy and energy efficiency include the California Energy Commission's Integrated Energy Policy Report (IEPR), Title 24 standards, and CALGreen standards. The project would exceed 2022 Title 24 and CALGreen standards and incorporate all applicable energy efficiency measures in compliance with RR E-1 through E-5. The project proposes to remodel and reoccupy an existing building to use as an office building for Vista Charter Public School use. The proposed project would be compliant with all applicable goals and all other all applicable goals and policies by incorporating energy-, water- and waste -efficiency building features as per Title 24 standards. The project would also install water efficient features such as low -flow fixtures and water efficient and drought tolerant irrigation system to further reduce water consumption. Compliance with Title 24 and CALGreen standards would ensure the project's consistency with the IEPR building energy efficiency recommendations, which would ensure project conformance with the State's energy reduction goals. Less than significant impacts would occur in this regard. 4.6.3 Conclusion The project is consistent with the General Plan Update. With implementation of RR E-1 through E-5, the proposed project would not have any specific effects which are peculiar to the project or the site. There are no project -specific impacts or potentially significant off -site or cumulative impacts the GPU EIR failed to analyze, and there are no new significant or substantially more severe energy impacts than anticipated by the GPU EIR. Applicable GPU EIR Regulatory Requirements/Mitigation Measures: RR E-1 Construction activities will be conducted in compliance with California Code of Regulations Section 2485, which requires that nonessential idling of construction equipment be restricted to five minutes or less. RR E-2 At least 65 percent of all nonhazardous construction and demolition waste from nonresidential construction associated with future development in the plan area shall be recycled and/or salvaged for reuse in line with the 2016 California Green Building Standards Code Section 5.408 (California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 11). RR E-3 New buildings implemented as part of the General Plan Update are required to achieve the current California Building Energy and Efficiency Standards (California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 6) and California Green Building Standards Code (California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 11). RR E-4 Any appliances associated with development in the Plan Area shall meet the requirements of the 2012 Appliance Efficiency Regulations. RR E-5 Development under the General Plan Update shall support the goals of the renewables portfolio standard, SB 350, and SB 100 to achieve a tiered increase in the use of renewable energy to 60 percent by 2030, and 100 percent by 2045. Dec i y ouncil 26 — 85 1/16/20'2 e 25 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 4.7 Geology and Soils 4.7.1 GPU EIR Findings The GPU EIR concluded that future development under the General Plan Update would be subject to potential seismic -related hazards including strong seismic ground shaking, seismic - related ground failure, and landslides. Further, development associated with the General Plan Update could result in unstable geologic unit or soil conditions, including soil erosion, expansive soils, settlement and collapse, and subsidence. However, implementation of RR G-1, through G- 3 would reduce impacts to less than significant levels. Specifically, RR G-1 and G-2 require development to comply with the most recent version of the California Building Code and Municipal Code Chapter 8, Buildings and Structures, and RR G-3 requires all buildings or structures within the City that require plumbing fixtures be connected to a public sewer per Municipal Code Section 39-51, Mandatory Connections. The GPU EIR also concluded that development under the General Plan Update could impact known and unknown paleontological resources through grading and construction activities of undeveloped areas or redevelopment that requires more intensive soil excavation than in the past. Therefore, Mitigation Measures GEO-1 through GEO- 3 require monitoring based on the sensitivity level of sites for paleontological resources. Overall, the GPU EIR concluded that implementation of regulatory requirements and Mitigation Measures GEO-1 through GEO-3 would reduce geology and soil impacts to less than significant levels. 4.7.2 Project Analysis The project site is located in a seismically active area, as is most of southern California. However, the project site is not located within a State -designated Alquist-Priolo Fault Hazard Zone. The nearest fault to the project site is the Bolsa-Fairview Fault (Newport -Inglewood Rose Canyon fault zone), located approximately 5.5 miles to the southwest. No active faults are known to cross the project site. Additionally, the site is not located in an area identified as a potential landslide hazard area by the State or City. However, the project site is located within an area susceptible to liquefaction. As described above, implementation of RR G-1 and G-2 would reduce impacts in this regard to less than significant levels. Consistent with the General Plan, compliance with existing regulations would ensure the proposed project would not result in a significant impact related to seismic hazards or liquefaction. Construction of the proposed project would involve minimal ground -disturbing activities given the nature of the proposed improvements. As mentioned above, while construction activities may result in the potential for erosion to occur, implementation of RR G-1 and G-2 would reduce impacts in this regard to less than significant levels. Consistent with the General Plan, compliance with existing regulations including implementation of regulatory requirements would ensure the proposed project would not result in a significant impact related to erosion. No new or substantially more severe impacts would occur compared to the determinations of the GPU EIR, and no new mitigation measures are required. Lateral spreading is a type of liquefaction -induced ground failure on mildly sloping ground. However, the project site is located on relatively level ground, and implementation of the proposed project would not increase the risk of landslides. Therefore, no impacts related to lateral spreading would occur. Subsidence is the lowering of surface elevation due to changes occurring underground, such as the extraction of large amounts of groundwater. The proposed project would not involve the extraction of any groundwater, oil, or gas from the project site. Clay -based soils are typically susceptible to expansion. The geologic materials under the project site have very low expansive potential (plasticity index value less than 15) and are classified as non - Dec i y ouncil 26 — 86 1/16/20'2 e 26 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 expansive in accordance with the 2022 California Building Code, Section 1803.5.3.14,15 As such, no impacts related to unstable or expansive soils would occur. In compliance with RR G-3, construction and operation of the proposed project would not involve the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems. As such, compliance with existing regulatory requirements would ensure no impact related to the use of such systems would occur. With regards to paleontological resources, the project site is disturbed and built out in nature; however, sediments in the project site are considered to have paleontological sensitivity increasing with depth. Specifically, the project site is underlain by silty sand of alluvial fan deposits (Qyfsa) which contain "low -to -high" paleontological sensitivity; refer to GPU EIR Figure 5.6-3, Paleontological Sensitivity. As such, in the event of paleontological resource discovery, the proposed project would comply with GPU EIR Mitigation Measure GEO-3, which requires construction work to halt within a 50-foot radius of a find. With adherence to the City's existing requirements for paleontological resources, less than significant impacts related to paleontological resources would occur. 4.7.3 Conclusion Overall, the project is consistent with the General Plan Update. With implementation of RR G-1 and G-2 and Mitigation Measure GEO-3 identified in the GPU EIR, the proposed project would not have any specific effects which are peculiar to the project or the site. There are no project - specific impacts or potentially significant off -site or cumulative impacts the GPU EIR failed to analyze, and there are no new significant or substantially more severe impacts to geology and soils than anticipated by the GPU EIR. Applicable GPU EIR Regulatory Requirements/Mitigation Measures: RR G-1 Every public agency enforcing building regulations must adopt the provisions of the California Building Code (CBC), which is Title 24, Part 2 of the California Code of Regulations. The most recent version is the 2019 CBC (effective January 1, 2020). The CBC is updated every three years and provides minimum standards to protect property and public safety by regulating the design and construction of excavations, foundations, building frames, retaining walls, and other building elements to mitigate the effects of seismic shaking and adverse soil conditions. The CBC also contains provisions for earthquake safety based on factors including occupancy type, the types of soil and rock on -site, and the strength of ground shaking with specified probability of occurring at a site. RR G-2 Santa Ana Municipal Code, Chapter 8, Buildings and Structures. These codes address grading standards, excavation, and fills. This also includes compliance with regulations for unreinforced masonry structures in accordance with "Unreinforced Masonry Law," found in California Government Code §§ 8875 et seq. The City of Santa Ana Building Official may place additional requirements upon the construction of infrastructure, buildings, and other improvements based on the findings from plan check, soils testing, and geotechnical investigations. 14International Code Council, 2022 California Building Code, Title 24, Part 2, https://codes.iccsafe.org/content/CABC2022P1/chapter-18-soils-and-foundations, accessed July 26, 2023. 15 U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Web Soil Survey, https://websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov/app/WebSoilSurvey.aspx, accessed July 26, 2023. Dec 1 y ouncil 26 — 87 1/16/202 e 27 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 RR G-3 Santa Ana Municipal Code Section 39-51 requires that all buildings or structures within the city that require plumbing fixtures must be connected to a public sewer. GEO-3 All Projects. In the event of any fossil discovery, regardless of depth or geologic formation, construction work shall halt within a 50-foot radius of the find until its significance can be determined by a qualified paleontologist. Significant fossils shall be recovered, prepared to the point of curation, identified by qualified experts, listed in a database to facilitate analysis, and deposited in a designated paleontological curation facility in accordance with the standards of the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology (2010). The most likely repository is the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County. The repository shall be identified and a curatorial arrangement shall be signed prior to collection of the fossils. 4.8 Greenhouse Gas Emissions 4.8.1 GPU EIR Findings The GPU EIR determined that implementation of Mitigation Measure GHG-1 would ensure that the City is tracking and monitoring the City's GHG emissions to chart a trajectory to achieve the long-term, year 2050, GHG reduction goal set by Executive Order S-03-05. However, at this time, there is no plan past 2030 that achieves the long-term GHG reduction goal established under Executive Order S-03-05. As identified by the California Council on Science and Technology, the State cannot meet the 2050 goal without major advancements in technology. Advancements in technology in the future could provide additional reductions and allow the State and City to meet the 2050 goal, but in the meantime, the GPU EIR determined that buildout of the General Plan Update would result in significant and unavoidable GHG impacts. However, the GPU EIR determined that the General Plan Update would not conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions. 4.8.2 Project Analysis The following section evaluates the potential GHG impacts that would result from implementation of the proposed project. This analysis is primarily based upon Attachment A, Air Qualitu/Greenhouse Gas/Energy Modelinq Results. THRESHOLDS OF SIGNIFICANCE Amendments to CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.4 were adopted to assist lead agencies in determining the significance of the impacts of GHG emissions and gives lead agencies the discretion to determine whether to assess those emissions quantitatively or qualitatively. This section recommends certain factors to be considered in the determination of significance (i.e., the extent to which a project may increase or reduce GHG emissions compared to the existing environment; whether the project exceeds an applicable significance threshold; and the extent to which the project complies with regulations or requirements adopted to implement a plan for the reduction or mitigation of GHGs). The amendments do not establish a threshold of significance; rather, lead agencies are granted discretion to establish significance thresholds for their respective jurisdictions, including looking to thresholds developed by other public agencies or suggested by other experts, such as the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), so long as any threshold chosen is supported by substantial evidence (CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.7(c)). The California Natural Resources Agency has also clarified that the CEQA Guidelines amendments focus on the effects of GHG emissions as cumulative impacts, and therefore GHG emissions should be analyzed in the context of CEQA's Dec i y ouncil 26 — 88 1/16/202 e 28 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 requirements for cumulative impact analyses (CEQA Guidelines Section 15064(h)(3)).16,17 A project's incremental contribution to a cumulative impact can be found not cumulatively considerable if the project would comply with an approved plan or mitigation program that provides specific requirements to avoid or substantially lessen the cumulative problem within the geographic area of the project.18 The GPU EIR describes that if project emissions are below the 3,000 MTCO2e bright -line screening threshold, GHG emissions impacts would be considered less than significant. As such, the analysis utilizes the 3,000 MTCO2e per year numerical threshold of significance for GHG emissions and the methodology for evaluating the project's impacts related to GHG emissions also focuses on its consistency with Statewide, regional, and local plans adopted for the purpose of reducing and/or mitigating GHG emissions. PROJECT -RELATED GHG EMISSIONS Project -related GHG emissions include emissions from direct and indirect sources. Direct project - related GHG emissions include emissions from construction activities, area sources, mobile sources, and refrigerants, while indirect sources include emissions from energy consumption, water demand, and solid waste generation. The CalEEMod, version 2022.1 was used to calculate project -related GHG emissions. Table 3, Estimated Greenhouse Gas Emissions, presents the estimated CO2, N20, and CH4 emissions associated with the proposed project; refer to Attachment A for the CaIEEMod outputs. "California Natural Resources Agency, Final Statement of Reasons for Regulatory Action, pp. 11-13, 14, 16, December 2009, https://resources.ca.gov/CNRALegacyFiles/ceqa/docs/Final_Statement_of_Reasons.pdf, accessed July 13, 2023. " State of California Governor's Office of Planning and Research, Transmittal of the Governor's Office of Planning and Research's Proposed SB97 CEQA Guidelines Amendments to the Natural Resources Agency, April 13, 2009, https://planning.lacity.org/eir/CrossroadsHwd/deir/files/references/COl.pdf, accessed July 13, 2023. 18 14 CCR Section 15064(h)(3). Dec I y ouncil 26 — 89 1/16/20'2 e 29 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 Table 3 Estimated Greenhouse Gas Emissions Source CO2 CH4 N20 Refrigerants COze Metric Tons/year' Direct Emissions Construction amortized over 30 ears 2.57 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 2.58 Area Source 0.14 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 0.14 Mobile Source 55.10 <0.01 <0.01 0.01 56.00 Refrigerants 0.00 0.00 0.00 <0.01 <0.01 Total Direct Emissions2 57.81 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 58.72 Indirect Emissions Energy 39.50 <0.01 <0.01 0.00 39.70 Solid Waste 0.58 0.06 0.00 0.00 2.03 Water Demand 2.48 0.04 <0.01 0.00 3.78 Total Indirect Emissions2 42.56 0.10 <0.01 0.00 45.51 Total Project -Related Emissionsz 104.23 GPU EIR GHG Significance Threshol'dsl 3,000 MTCO2e Exceeds Thresholds? No Notes: 1. Emissions calculated using California Emissions Estimator Model Version 2022.1 (CaIEEMod) computer model and are based on 7,000 square feet building area as a conservative analysis. 2. Totals may be slightly off due to rounding. Refer to Attachment A, for detailed model in utlout ut data. Direct Project -Related Sources of Greenhouse Gases Construction Emissions. Construction GHG emissions are typically summed and amortized over the lifetime of the project (assumed to be 30 years), then added to the operational emissions.19 The project would comply with RR GHG-1 which restricts non -essential idling of construction equipment and RR GHG-7 which ensures recycling and/or salvaging for reuse at minimum of 65 percent of the nonhazardous construction and demolition waste generated during construction. As shown in Table 3, the proposed project would result in 2.58 MTCO2e per year construction emissions when amortized over 30 years (or a total of 77.3 MTCO2e in 30 years). Area Source. Area source emissions were calculated using CaIEEMod and project -specific land use data. Project -related area sources include natural gas consumption for space heating and exhaust emissions from landscape maintenance equipment, such as lawnmowers, shedders/grinders, blowers, trimmers, chain saws, and hedge trimmers used to maintain the landscaping of the site. The project would directly result in 0.14 MTCO2e per year from area source emissions; refer to Table 3. Mobile Source. CaIEEMod relies upon trip generation rates from the Vista Heritage Global Academy Expansion Trip Generation Assessment prepared by Urban Crossroads and dated July 24, 2023. The proposed project would generate 84 average daily trips without taking trip reduction from the existing uses on -site as they are currently vacant. The project would result in 19 The project lifetime is based on the standard 30-year assumption of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (South Coast Air Quality Management District, Draft Guidance Document - Interim CEQA Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Significance Threshold, October 2008). Dec I y ouncil 26 - 90 1/16/202 e 30 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 approximately 56.00 MTCO2e per year of mobile source generated GHG emissions; refer to Table 3. Refrigerants. Refrigerants are substances used in equipment for air conditioning and refrigeration. Most of the refrigerants used today are HFCs or blends thereof, which can have high GWP values. All equipment that uses refrigerants has a charge size (i.e., quantity of refrigerant the equipment contains), and an operational refrigerant leak rate, and each refrigerant has a GWP that is specific to that refrigerant. CalEEMod quantifies refrigerant emissions from leaks during regular operation and routine servicing over the equipment lifetime, and then derives average annual emissions from the lifetime estimate. The proposed project would result in less than 0.01 MTCO2e per year of GHG emissions from refrigerants; refer to Table 3. Indirect Project -Related Sources of Greenhouse Gases Energy Consumption. Energy consumption emissions were calculated using CalEEMod and project -specific land use data. Southern California Edison (SCE) would provide electricity to the project site. Compliance with RR GHG-1 would ensure project's consistency with 2022 Title 24 standards. The project would also exceed 2022 Title 24 standards, which has been not incorporated in CalEEMod as a conservative analysis. The project would indirectly result in 39.70 MTCO2e per year due to energy consumption; refer to Table 3. Solid Waste. Solid waste associated with operations of the proposed project would result in 2.03 MTCO2e per year; refer to Table 3. Water Demand. The project would comply with RR GHG-3 which ensures adherence to current CALGreen standards that requires increased water efficiency and reduce urban per capita water demand. The project operations would result in a demand of approximately 6.57 million gallons of water per year. Emissions from indirect energy impacts due to water supply would result in 3.78 MTCO2e per year; refer to Table 3. Total Project -Related Sources of Greenhouse Gases As shown in Table 3, the total amount of project -related GHG emissions from direct and indirect sources combined would total 104.23 MTCO2e per year. As such, the project would not exceed the 3,000 MTCO2e bright -line screening threshold and no new impacts would occur. CONSISTENCY WITH APPLICABLE GHG PLANS, POLICIES, OR REGULATIONS The GHG plan consistency analysis for the project is based on the project's consistency with the CARB 2022 Scoping Plan for Achieving Carbon Neutrality (2022 Scoping Plan), and the City's General Plan Update. The 2022 Scoping Plan describes the approach the State will take to achieve carbon neutrality by 2045. The General Plan Update contains goals, policies, and measures that would reduce GHG emissions within the City. Consistency with the 2022 CARB Scoping Plan The 2022 Scoping Plan identifies reduction measures necessary to achieve the goal of carbon neutrality by 2045 or earlier. Actions that reduce GHG emissions are identified for each Assembly Bill (AB) 32 inventory sector. Provided in Table 4, Consistency with the 2022 Scoping Plan: AB 32 GHG Inventory Sectors, is an evaluation of applicable reduction actions/strategies by emissions source category to determine how the project would be consistent with or exceed reduction actions/strategies outlined in the 2022 Scoping Plan. Dec i y ouncil 26 — 91 1/16/20'2 e 31 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 Table 4 Consistency with the 2022 Scoping Plan: AB 32 GHG Inventory Sectors Actions and Strategies Project Consistency Analysis Smart Growth I Vehicles Miles Traveled VMT Reduce VMT per capita to 25% below Consistent. The project would require installation of bicycle parking in 2019 levels by 2030, and 30% below accordance with the 2022 Title 24 standards and CALGreen Code, which would 2019 levels by 2045 promote alternative mode of transportation to reduce VMT. Additionally, the project would be located near an existing Orange County Transportation Authority transit stop. As such, the project would be consistent with this action. New Residential and Commercial Buildin s All electric appliances beginning 2026 Consistent. The project is expected to consist of natural gas heating and/or (residential) and 2029 (commercial), cooking on -site. The City has not adopted an ordinance or program limiting the contributing to 6 million heat pumps use of natural gas for on -site cooking and/or heating. However, if adopted, the installed statewide by 2030 project would comply with the applicable goals or policies limiting the use of natural gas equipment in the future. Furthermore, the project would install high efficiency lighting and appliances. As such, the project would be consistent with this action. Construction Equipment Achieve 25% of energy demand Consistent. The City has not adopted an ordinance or program requiring electrified by 2030 and 75% electrified by electricity -powered construction equipment. However, if adopted, the project 2045 would be required to comply with the applicable goals or policies requiring the use of electric construction equipment in the future. As such, the project would be consistent with this action. Non -combustion Methane Emissions Divert 75% of organic waste from landfills Consistent. Senate Bill (SB) 1383 establishes targets to achieve a 50 percent by 2025 reduction in the level of the Statewide disposal of organic waste from the 2014 level by 2020 and a 75 percent reduction by 2025. The law establishes an additional target that not less than 20 percent of currently disposed edible food is recovered for human consumption by 2025. The project would comply with local and regional regulations and recycle or compost 75 percent of waste by 2025 pursuant to SB 1383. As such, the project would be consistent with this action. Source: California Air Resources Board, 2022 Scoping Plan, November 16, 2022. Consistency with the General Plan Update As previously stated, the project proposes to remodel and reoccupy an existing building to use as an office building. As an infill redevelopment project, the proposed project would require and produce less water, waste, and air quality pollutants compared to a new development. Furthermore, the project would be compliant with General Plan Update Policy 4.1, Policy 4.2, Policy 4.3, Policy 4.4, and Policy 4.5 which incorporate energy-, water- and waste -efficiency building features as per Title 24 standards. The project would also be consistent with General Plan Update Policy 3.11, Policy 1.6, Policy 1.8, and Policy 1.12 by providing bicycle parking spaces on -site and due to the close proximity to the nearby transit station, which would promote alternative modes of transportation. As such, by complying with the City's CAP and Title 24 standards, the project would also be consistent with the applicable GHG goals and policies in the General Plan Update. Consistency Conclusion In summary, the project's characteristics render it consistent with Statewide, regional, and local climate change mandates, plans, policies, and recommendations. More specifically, the GHG plan consistency analysis provided above demonstrates that the project complies with the regulations and GHG reduction goals, policies, actions, and strategies outlined in the 2022 Scoping Plan, and Dec i y ouncil 26 — 92 1/16/20'2 e 32 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 General Plan Update. Consistency with these plans would reduce the impact of the project's incremental contribution of GHG emissions. Accordingly, the project would not conflict with any applicable plan, policy, regulation, or recommendation adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions. Impacts in this regard would be less than significant. 4.8.3 Conclusion Overall, the project is consistent with the General Plan Update. With implementation of RR GHG- 1, GHG-2, GHG-3, and GHG -7, the proposed project would not have any specific effects which are peculiar to the project or the site. There are no project -specific impacts or potentially significant off -site or cumulative impacts the GPU EIR failed to analyze, and there are no new significant or substantially more severe GHG impacts than anticipated by the GPU EIR. Applicable GPU EIR Regulatory Requirements/Mitigation Measures: RR GHG-1 New buildings are required to achieve the current California Building Energy and Efficiency Standards (Title 24, Part 6) and California Green Building Standards Code (CALGreen) (Title 24, Part 11). The 2019 Building and Energy Efficiency Standards were effective on January 1, 2020. The Building Energy and Efficiency Standards and CALGreen are updated tri-annually. RR GHG-2 Construction activities are required to adhere to California Code of Regulations, Title 13, Section 2499, which restricts nonessential idling of construction equipment to five minutes or less. RR GHG-3 New buildings are required to adhere to the California Green Building Standards Code and Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance requirements to increase water efficiency and reduce urban per capita water demand. RR GHG-7 California's Green Building Standards Code (CALGreen) requires the recycling and/or salvaging for reuse at minimum of 65 percent of the nonhazardous construction and demolition waste generated during most "new construction" projects (CALGreen §§ 4.408 and 5.408). Construction contractors are required to submit a construction waste management plan that identifies the construction and demolition waste materials to be diverted from disposal by recycling, reuse on the project, or salvaged for future use or sale and the amount (by weight or volume). 4.9 Hazards and Hazardous Materials 4.9.1 GPU EIR Findings The GPU EIR concluded that buildout of the proposed General Plan Update would include construction activities and operations that would transport, use, or dispose of hazardous materials in proximity to environmental justice (EJ) communities (i.e., disadvantaged communities). Such activity could create a significant hazard to the public or the environment given the proximity of hazardous materials sites which are considered open cases, existing lead -contaminated soils, existing buildings containing asbestos -containing materials (ACM) and/or lead -based paint (LBP), and existing and planned industrial uses throughout the City. Further, there are parts of the City that are within the vicinity of the John Wayne Airport Compatibility Land Use Plan. However, the existing federal, State, and regional regulatory framework regarding hazardous materials is substantial and would apply to all future construction and operation of uses within the City. Further, the GPU EIR included regulatory requirements that are specific to existing hazards and Dec i y ouncil 26 — 93 1/16/202 e 33 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 hazardous materials conditions in the City. Compliance with all applicable regulations would be required of future development in the City and would reduce the proposed General Plan Update's impacts related to hazards or hazardous materials to a less than significant level. According to GPU EIR Figure 2-1, EJ Communities, Neighborhoods, and Focus Areas, the project site is located within an EJ community. However, the proposed project would neither develop any new industrial uses, nor be located on or adjacent to a site listed under Table 5.8-5, Existing Hazardous Materials Sites, of the GPU EIR. Construction activities would use limited amounts of hazardous materials in the form of paints, solvents, glues, roofing materials, and other common construction materials for the proposed building remodel and outdoor play area. Construction activities may include the use of machinery and other equipment that require fueling or maintenance/servicing. These types of materials are not acutely hazardous, and all storage, handling, use, transport, and disposal of these would be required to conform to existing laws and regulations of the California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC), United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA), Occupational Safety & Health Administration (OSHA), and Orange County Health Care Agency (OCHCA) Environmental Health Division, which would ensure that all potentially hazardous materials are used and handled in an appropriate manner and would minimize the potential for safety impacts to occur. Additionally, the storage, handling, use, transport, and disposal of these hazardous materials would cease once construction is complete. Project compliance with RR HAZ-1 would ensure hazardous materials and hazardous wastes are transported in compliance with any applicable State and federal requirements; RR HAZ-2 would ensure hazardous waste generation, transportation, treatment, storage, and disposal would be conducted in compliance with Subtitle C of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, Part 263); RR HAZ-4 would ensure demolition activities that could expose works or the public to ACMs or LBPs would be conducted in accordance with any applicable State and federal requirements, and RR HAZ-5 would ensure removal of hazardous materials be conducted as outlined in 29 CFR 1910.120 and 8 CCR 5192. Therefore, with adherence to existing regulations, impacts related to the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials and accidental release of hazardous materials would be less than significant. 4.9.2 Project Analysis Vista Heritage Global Academy is adjacent to the south of the project site. As stated above, the proposed project would comply with existing regulations to minimize the risks associated with the exposure of sensitive receptors, including the existing school, to hazardous materials to a less than significant level. The types of uses that would emit or release hazardous or acutely hazardous materials into the environment are typically industrial manufacturing facilities, which is not proposed within the project site. The project would renovate an unused, vacant automobile repair building with a school district office and provide outdoor areas for existing students at the Vista Heritage Global Academy. Although the project site is located within 0.25-mile of an existing school, hazardous materials are not typically associated with the proposed institutional (i.e., district office) or recreational (i.e., play yard and play field) uses. Anticipated hazardous materials use during project operations may include minor cleaning products and the occasional use of pesticides and herbicides for landscape maintenance. Further, while the site is located adjacent to an existing railroad alignment, it is currently under construction for future electric street cars. Compliance with applicable laws and regulations regarding the handling and transport of hazardous materials, including RR HAZ-1, HAZ-2, HAZ-4, and HAZ-5 would ensure impacts would be less than significant. The project site is not listed in the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) GeoTracker system which includes leaking underground fuel tank sites and spills, leaks, investigations, and Dec i y ouncil 26 — 94 1/16/202 e 34 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 cleanups sites; or the DTSC EnviroStor Data Management System which includes Cortese sites; or the U.S. EPA's database of regulated facilities.20 As such, impacts related to hazardous materials sites would be less than significant. The John Wayne Airport is adjacent to the City's southeast boundary. The project site is approximately five miles northwest of the John Wayne Airport. The John Wayne Airport Compatibility Land Use Plan regulates land use development within the vicinity of the airport. According to Figure 5.8-5, John Wayne Airport Safety Compatibility Zones, and Figure 5.8-6, Height Restrictions per Federal Air Regulations Part 77, of the GPU EIR, the project site is located outside of the John Wayne Airport's safety compatibility zone and height restriction areas. As such, the proposed project would not result in a safety hazard or excessive noise for people residing and working in the project area. Impacts would be less than significant. Construction equipment and materials staging would occur within the project site. During construction, vehicular access would be provided via existing access points along North Fairview Street and West 5th Street. Operation of the proposed project would not result in population growth or changes to the existing circulation system. All driveways would be 20 feet in width; the modified student drop-off and pick-up area would have a 20-foot turn radius and 72-foot-wide turnaround, providing a more immediate point of access to the proposed development from West 5th Street and adequate space for emergency vehicle access. As such, the proposed project would not interfere with operations of the City's Emergency Operations Center and would not interfere with operations of emergency response agencies or with coordination and cooperation between such agencies; thus, impacts to emergency response planning would be less than significant. The City of Santa Ana is not in a designated fire hazard zone. As such, no impact related to the risk of wildland fires would occur. 4.9.3 Conclusion Overall, the project is consistent with buildout of the General Plan Update. With implementation of RR HAZ-1, HAZ-2, HAZ-4, and HAZ-5 identified in the GPU EIR, the proposed project would not have any specific effects which are peculiar to the project or the site. There are no project specific impacts or potentially significant off -site or cumulative impacts the GPU EIR failed to analyze, and there are no new significant or substantially more severe impacts to hazards and hazardous materials than anticipated by the GPU EIR. Applicable GPU EIR Regulatory Requirements/Mitigation Measures: RR HAZ-1 Hazardous materials and hazardous wastes will be transported to and/or from projects developed under the General Plan Update in compliance with any applicable state and federal requirements, including the U.S. Department of Transportation regulations listed in the Code of Federal Regulations (Title 49, Hazardous Materials Transportation Act); California Department of Transportation standards; and the California Occupational Safety and Health Administration standards. RR HAZ-2 Hazardous waste generation, transportation, treatment, storage, and disposal will be conducted in compliance with Subtitle C of the Resource Conservation and 20 California Environmental Protection Agency, Cortese Listing, https://calepa.ca.gov/sitecleanup/corteselist/, accessed July 6, 2023. Dec I y ouncil 26 — 95 1/16/202 e 35 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 Recovery Act (Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, Part 263), including the management of nonhazardous solid wastes and underground tanks storing petroleum and other hazardous substances. The projects developed under the General Plan Update will be designed and constructed in accordance with the regulations of the Orange County Health Care Agency, Environmental Health Division, which serves as the designated Certified Unified Program Agency. RR HAZ-4 Demolition activities that have the potential to expose construction workers and/or the public to asbestos -containing materials or lead -based paint will be conducted in accordance with applicable regulations, including, but not limited to: • South Coast Air Quality Management District's Rule 1403 • California Health and Safety Code (Section 39650 et seq.) • California Code of Regulations (Title 8, Section 1529) • California Occupational Safety and Health Administration regulations (California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 1529 [Asbestos] and Section 1532.1 [Lead]) • Code of Federal Regulations (Title 40, Part 61 [asbestos], Title 40, Part 763 [asbestos], and Title 29, Part 1926 [asbestos and lead]). RR HAZ-5 The removal of hazardous materials, such as polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), mercury -containing light ballast, and mold, will be completed in accordance with applicable regulations pursuant to 40 CFR 761 (PCBs), 40 CFR 273 (mercury - containing light ballast), and 29 CFR 1926 (molds) by workers with the hazardous waste operations and emergency response (HAZWOPER) training, as outlined in 29 CFR 1910.120 and 8 CCR 5192. 4.10 Hydrology and Water Quality 4.10.1 GPU EIR Findings The GPU EIR concluded that compliance with local, State, and federal regulations and the policies of the proposed General Plan Update would reduce buildout impacts related to groundwater, drainage, hydrology, and water quality. Individual projects would be required to incorporate project -specific source control and treatment Best Management Practices (BMPs), incorporate low impact design (LID)/site design, and comply with applicable regulatory requirements to ensure compliance with regulations governing water quality (e.g., the City's Local Implementation Plan [LIP], Orange County Drainage Area Management Plan and National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System [NPDES] Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System [MS4] Permit from the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board (RR HYD-4), and the City's Model Water Quality Management Plan [WQMP]). 4.10.2 Project Analysis Construction activities have the potential to degrade water quality through the exposure of surface runoff to exposed soils, dust, and other debris at the project site as well as increase erosion and/or siltation. As the project would develop a 0.9-acre site, the project would not be required to obtain coverage under the NPDES Construction General Permit (CGP). However, project compliance Dec i y ouncil 26 — 96 1/16/202 e 36 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 with RR HYD-5 would ensure adherence to Municipal Code Chapter 18 Article IV regarding prohibitions on illicit connections and discharges, urban runoff control measures, and permit requirements. As a result, water quality impacts associated with construction activities would be less than significant. As the project would introduce new uses (i.e., office and outdoor areas) to the project site, development of a WQMP consistent with the prevailing terms and conditions of the City's LIP, Orange County Drainage Area Management Plan and NPDES MS4 Permit from the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board, i.e., RR HYD-4, and the City's Model WQMP would be required. The WQMP would include LID/site design and project -specific BMPs to ensure water quality standards or waste discharge requirements are not violated, and to prevent substantial erosion or siltation on- or offsite. Further, existing drainage facilities within the public right-of-way (i.e., West 5th Street and North Fairview Street) would be maintained. Therefore, with compliance to existing regulations to control construction stormwater runoff during operation, impacts related to water quality standards, waste discharge requirements, and storm water drainage would be less than significant, consistent with the General Plan Update. Given the proposed uses, the project would not result in substantial population growth within Santa Ana. According to the GPU EIR, projected water demand from the proposed General Plan Update at buildout, including development of the proposed project, is well within the projected total water demand for 2040 in the City of Santa Ana 2015 Urban Water Management Plan for normal, dry year, and multiple dry year scenarios. Additionally, because the project site was formerly occupied by automotive repair businesses and associated parking area, development of the proposed project would not interfere with groundwater recharge. Therefore, consistent with the General Plan Update, the proposed project would result in less than significant impacts related to groundwater. The GPU EIR determined that sites within the West Santa Ana Boulevard Focus Area that would be updated from single-family to multi -family residential use would become areas with increased impervious surfaces, and as a consequence, areas of increased stormwater runoff peak flows compared to pre -project conditions. The proposed project would renovate an existing building, formerly occupied by automobile repair businesses, into an office building; no change in density is proposed and the building footprint would not change from existing conditions. Additionally, the project proposes new landscaped areas, including a community garden, play field, and play yard, where paved surface parking currently exists. As such, the project would reduce the amount of impervious areas on the project site compared to existing conditions. According to Figure 5.9-4, City of Santa Ana Flood Zones, of the GPU EIR, the project site is not within a 100-year flood hazard area as designated by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). According to Figure 5.9-5, Dam Inundation Areas, of the GPU EIR, the project site is within both the Santiago Creek Dam and Prado Dam inundation areas. However, the Santiago Creek Dam has been assessed by the California Division of Safety of Dams (DSOD) to have no existing or potential dam safety deficiencies and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' Dam Safety Program is actively implementing risk -reduction measures to remediate the Prado Dam, including routine inspections and ongoing monitoring, spillway modifications to improve downstream flow, and public outreach, to ensure potential inundation hazards are minimized or eliminated.21 The GPU EIR determined that seiche occurrence is lower within inundation zones, 21 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Corps reclassifies Prado Damn, implements risk -reduction measures, https://www.spl.usace.army. mil/Media/News-Releases/Article/1849301 /corps-reclassifies-prado-dam-implements- risk-reduction-measures/, May 15, 2019. Dec I y ouncil 26 — 97 1/16/202 e 37 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 and that the City is too far inland to be at risk of a tsunamis. As such, implementation of the proposed project would result in less than significant impacts in this regard. 4.10.3 Conclusion Overall, the project is consistent with the General Plan Update. With implementation of RRs HYD- 4 and HYD-5 identified in the GPU EIR, the proposed project would not have any specific effects which are peculiar to the project or the site. There are no project specific impacts or potentially significant off -site or cumulative impacts the GPU EIR failed to analyze, and there are no new significant or substantially more severe impacts to hydrology and water quality than anticipated by the GPU EIR. Applicable GPU EIR Regulatory Requirements/Mitigation Measures: RR HYD-4 All development pursuant to the General Plan Update shall comply with the requirements of the Orange County MS4 Permit (Order R8-2009-0030, NPDES No. CAS618030, as amended by Order No. R8-2010 0062). The MS4 Permit requires new development and redevelopment projects to: • Control contaminants into storm drain systems • Educate the public about stormwater impacts • Detect and eliminate illicit discharges • Control runoff from construction sites • Implement best management practices and site -specific runoff controls and treatments for new development and redevelopment. RR HYD-5 All development pursuant to the General Plan Update shall comply with the requirements detailed in Chapter 18 Article IV of the Santa Ana Municipal Code. 4.11 Land Use and Planning 4.11.1 GPU EIR Findings The GPU EIR concluded that the General Plan Update's policies would encourage the preservation or enhancement of the existing residential communities through infill development, open space opportunities, and development of compatible uses that would enhance the existing character of the City. A primary goal of the General Plan Update is to preserve and improve the character and integrity of existing neighborhoods and districts; specific policies would reduce the conflict between contrasting land uses and enhance neighborhoods by responsibly integrating new development into existing communities. None of the changes in the General Plan Update would affect plans, policies, or regulations of other agencies that have jurisdiction within the City, including the Airport Environs Land Use Plan for the John Wayne Airport, the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) Congestion Management Plan, and the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) 2020-2045 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS). As individual projects are considered by the City, each would be subject to a variety of federal, State, and locally adopted plans designed to mitigate environmental impacts or to preserve important resources. As such, impacts associated with the General Plan Update with regards to land use and planning would be less than significant. Dec i y ouncil 26 — 98 1/16/20'2 e 38 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 4.11.2 Project Analysis The proposed project would remodel and reoccupy a building formerly occupied by an automotive repair use as an office building for Vista Charter Public Schools. The project would also redevelop the shared surface parking lot into an outdoor area consisting of a community garden, a play field, and a play yard for administrative staff and existing students associated with the adjacent school; the outdoor areas would not be open to the public. Ancillary improvements include landscaping fencing along the perimeters of the proposed outdoor areas, and expansion of the existing parking lot. Similar to existing conditions, the site would remain accessible from North Fairview Street via two driveways to the west, and two alleys connecting to West 5th Street to the south and southeast. The student drop-off and pick-up area and internal site circulation would be slightly modified to accommodate the outdoor learning garden space and the outdoor play areas. The project site is not within a residential community; it is surrounded by industrial uses, with nearby residential uses separated by an existing railroad alignment. As such, development of the proposed project would not divide any established surrounding residential community. The project is subject to the policies and/or regulations of the General Plan Update and Municipal Code at the local level. As previously stated, the project site has a land use designation of Industrial/Flex-Low (FLEX-1.5) and is within the Light Industrial (Ml) and Specific Development No. 82 (SD-82) zones. The FLEX-1.5 designation allows for various office uses, a maximum FAR of 1.5 and a maximum building height of three stories. The proposed project would renovate an existing 5,837-square foot building as an office building for Vista Charter Public Schools. The building is located on a 0.9-acre (39,204 square -foot) site, thus providing an FAR of 0.15. The existing building height would remain the same at 19 feet and four inches. As such, the project would meet the design standards of the FLEX-1.5 designation. Further, as detailed in Table 5, General Plan Update Land Use Element Project Consistency Analysis, the proposed project would be consistent with the applicable General Plan Update Land Use Element goals and policies. Table 5 General Plan Update Land Use Element Project Consistency Analysis Applicable General Plan Land Use Policies Project Consistency Analysis Goal LU-1: Provide a land use plan that improves quality of life and respects our existing community. Policy LU-1.1: Foster compatibility between land uses to Consistent. Industrial, commercial, institutional, and residential uses enhance livability and promote healthy lifestyles. surround the project site, including Vista Heritage Global Academy and Templo Calvario Church, which both share parking with the project site, and office uses to the south and the Romero -Cruz Academy to the west. The project proposes to remodel and reoccupy a building formerly occupied by an automotive repair use as an office building for use as Vista Charter Public Schools district office. The project would also redevelop the shared surface parking lot in the southern portion of the site into an outdoor area consisting of a community garden, a play field, and a play yard. Outdoor areas would serve existing students of the adjoining Vista Heritage Global Academy. Overall, the redevelopment of the project site would be compatible with the adjoining institutional uses. Dec i y ouncil 26 — 99 1/16/20'2 e 39 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 Table 5 [cont'd] General Plan Update Land Use Element Project Consistency Analysis Applicable General Plan Land Use Policies Project Consistency Analysis Policy LU-1.3: Promote the creation of new open space Consistent. According to the GPU EIR, the project site is located and community -serving amenities in park -deficient within an EJ community. The project would redevelop the shared areas that keeps pace with the increase in multi -unit surface parking lot in the southern portion of the site into an outdoor housing development, with priority given to those that area consisting of an approximately 2,297-square-foot community are also within environmental justice area boundaries. garden, an approximately 7,372-square-foot play field, and an approximately 4,640-square-foot play yard. The outdoor areas would serve existing students of the adjoining Vista Heritage Global Academy. Policy LU-1.8: Ensure that new development projects Consistent. Refer to responses to Policies LU-1.1 and LU-1.3 above. provide a net community benefit. The project would renovate a currently vacant building into a school district office and redevelop a surface parking lot into community and student -serving open space areas. Policy LU-1.9: Evaluate individual new development Consistent. The proposed project would remodel and reoccupy an proposals to determine if the proposals are consistent existing building for use as school district office and include outdoor with the General Plan and to ensure that they do not recreation areas and parking. The intent of the evaluation throughout compound existing public facility and service this document is to minimize adverse physical effects on the deficiencies. environment due to project implementation, including potential inconsistencies with the General Plan and/or increased demand on public services and facilities. Potential adverse effects on the environment related to the development of the proposed project have been evaluated in this document, and specifically throughout this table and in Section 4.15, Public Services. Goal LU-2: Provide a balance of land uses that meet Santa Ana's diverse needs. Policy LU-2.3: Provide a diversity of land uses that Consistent. The project would redevelop an existing surface parking support residents, visitors, and businesses, such as lot into a community garden. Additionally, the project would construct open space, areas for community gatherings, and a play field and play yard for students at Vista Heritage Global outdoor entertainment venues. Academy to use for open sace/recreational activities. Policy LU-2.6: Promote rehabilitation of properties and Consistent. Under existing conditions, the project site is developed encourage increased levels of capital investment to with a former automobile repair business and shares surface parking create a safe and attractive environment. with a neighboring school and church. The project proposes to redevelop the site and renovate the existing building into the Vista Charter Public Schools district office, inclusive of a community garden, play field, play yard, additional parking, and landscaping. Policy LU-2.9: Establish and maintain public open space Consistent. Refer to response to Policies LU-1.3, LU-1.8, and LU- and recreation requirements for new residential and 2.3 above. nonresidential uses to provide sufficient open space and recreational opportunities for Santa Ana residents and visitors. Goal LU-3: Preserve and improve the character and i tegrity of existing neighborhoods and districts. Policy LU-3.1: Support new development which Consistent. Refer to response to Policy LU-1.8 above. provides a net community benefit and contributes to neighborhood character and identity. Policy LU-3.4: Ensure that the scale and massing of Consistent. The project would redevelop an existing building; the new development is compatible and harmonious with project footprint and building height would be similar to existing the surrounding built environment. conditions and would comply with the design standards of the FLEX- 1.5 land use designation. Thus, the project would be compatible with other existing buildings in the Fairview Business Park. Dec i y ounci1 26 — 100 1/16/202 e4o Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 Table 5 [cont'd] General Plan Update Land Use Element Project Consistency Analysis Applicable General Plan Land Use Policies Project Consistency Analysis Goal LU-4: Support a sustainable Santa Ana through improvements to the built environment and a culture of collaboration. Policy LU-4.3: Encourage land uses and strategies that Consistent. As an infill redevelopment project, the proposed district reduce energy and water consumption, waste and noise office and outdoor areas would require/produce less water, waste, generation, soil contamination, air quality impacts, and soil contamination, and air quality pollutants compared to a new light pollution. development. Policy LU-4.8: Collaborate with property owners, Consistent. The project would redevelop the shared surface parking community organizations, and other local stakeholders lot in the southern portion of the site into an outdoor area consisting to identify opportunities for additional open space and of an approximately 2,297-square-foot community garden, an community services, such as community gardens and approximately 7,372-square-foot play field, and an approximately gathering places. 4,640-square-foot play yard. The outdoor areas would serve existing students of the adjoining Vista Heritage Global Academy. Policy LU-4.9: Encourage public, private and Consistent. Refer to responses to Policies LU-1.3, LU-1.8, and LU- commercial recreational facilities in areas that are park 2.3 above. and open space deficient. Source: City of Santa Ana, Golden City Beyond, Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Element, April 2022. Per RR LU-1, the project must comply with the applicable provisions of Chapter 41 (Zoning) of the City of Santa Ana Municipal Code. Permitted uses in the SD-82 zone are the uses permitted in the M1 zone as specified in Municipal Code Chapter 41, Article III, Division 18, M1 (Light Industrial), and schools by right and churches with a conditional use permit. Further, it is noted that the operational and development standards for the permitted and conditionally permitted Light Industrial Uses within the SD-82 zone shall be consistent with the operational and development standards found in Municipal Code Chapter 41, Article III, Division 18. To allow the use of the former automotive repair building for the proposed office use, a Zone Change would be required to modify the existing M1 zone to SD-82 to be consistent with the majority of the Fairview Business Park. In addition to the proposed Zone Change, the project also proposes a Zoning Ordinance Amendment to amend the operational standards of the SD-82 zoning district to allow outdoor play areas. Under current SD-82 provisions, play areas for children are limited to indoors only. Upon approval of the above entitlements, the proposed project would be consistent with the requirements of the General Plan Update and project site's zoning, and would not conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect. Impacts would be less than significant. 4.11.3 Conclusion As such, the project is consistent with the General Plan Update. With implementation of RR LU- 1 identified in the GPU EIR, the proposed project would not have any specific effects which are peculiar to the project or the site. There are no project specific impacts or potentially significant off -site or cumulative impacts the GPU EIR failed to analyze, and there are no new significant or substantially more severe impacts to land use and planning than anticipated by the GPU EIR. Applicable GPU EIR Regulatory Requirements/Mitigation Measures: RR LU-1 Development associated with the General Plan Update would be designed and constructed in accordance with the applicable provisions of Chapter 41 (Zoning) of the City of Santa Ana Municipal Code. Development within specific plan areas, overlay areas, and specific development districts would implement zoning and Dec i y ouncil 26 — 101 1/16/202 e41 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 development standards that are applicable within these subareas in addition to those in the underlying zoning district. 4.12 Mineral Resources 4.12.1 GPU EIR Findings According to the GPU EIR, the City does not have mineral resource sectors or active or inactive mines. Thus, implementation of the General Plan Update would not cause a loss of availability of known mineral resources. The City is mostly mapped as Mineral Resource Zone (MRZ) 3, which is an area where the significance of mineral deposits cannot be determined from available data. The area in the southeast portion of the City is mapped as MRZ-1, which means an area where no significant mineral resources are present or there is little likelihood that significant mineral resources are present. A small area in the northeast corner of the City is mapped as MRZ-2, which means significant mineral resources are known or very likely. However, the GPU EIR determined that no loss of availability of a known mineral resource would occur, and impacts would be less than significant. 4.12.2 Project Analysis According to Figure 5.11-1, Mineral Resource Zones, of the GPU EIR, which was adapted from the California Division of Mines and Geology map of mineral resource zones around the City, the project site, like most of Santa Ana, is mapped as MRZ-3. Therefore, implementation of the proposed project would not result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State and would not result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local General Plan, specific plan, or other land use plan. Therefore, consistent with the General Plan Update, no impact to mineral resources would occur. 4.12.3 Conclusion As such, the project is consistent with buildout of the General Plan Update. The proposed project would not have any specific effects which are peculiar to the project or the site. There are no project specific impacts or potentially significant off -site or cumulative impacts the GPU EIR failed to analyze, and there are no new significant or substantially more severe impacts to mineral resources than anticipated by the GPU EIR. Applicable GPU EIR Regulatory Requirements/Mitigation Measures: No GPU EIR regulatory requirements or mitigation measures apply. 4.13 Noise 4.13.1 GPU EIR Findings The GPU EIR concluded that implementation of the General Plan Update would result in significant temporary and permanent increases of noise levels throughout the City. Future development in accordance with the General Plan Update would generate both short-term and long-term noise level increases that may impact sensitive receptors. Implementation of the General Plan Update would include regulations designed to protect new sensitive land uses from excessive noise levels. Dec i y ouncil 26 — 102 1/16/20'2 e42 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 The GPU EIR described that Mitigation Measure N-1 would reduce potential noise impacts during construction to the extent feasible. However, due to the potential for proximity of construction activities to sensitive uses, the number of construction projects potentially occurring simultaneously, and the potential duration of construction activities, construction noise could result in a temporary substantial increase in noise levels above ambient conditions. Therefore, impacts would remain significant and unavoidable. The GPU EIR determined that buildout of the General Plan Update would cause substantial traffic noise to increase on local roadways and could locate sensitive receptors in areas that exceed established noise standards. While Mitigation Measure N-2 would reduce potential interior noise impacts to future noise sensitive receptors below thresholds, there are no feasible or practical mitigation measures available to reduce project -generated traffic noise to less than significant levels for existing residences along affected roadways. Thus, the GPU EIR determined that traffic noise would remain a significant and unavoidable impact. The GPU EIR discussed that construction activity would generate varying degrees of ground vibration, depending on the construction procedures and equipment, that has the potential to exceed the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) criteria for architectural damage (e.g., 0.12 inches per second peak particle velocity (PPV) for fragile or historical resources, 0.2 inches/second PPV for non -engineered timber and masonry buildings, and 0.3 inches/second PPV for engineered concrete and masonry). The GPU EIR determined that implementation of Mitigation Measure N-2 and adherence to associated performance standards, would reduce impacts to less than significant levels. 4.13.2 Project Analysis The following section evaluates potential short- and long-term noise and ground -borne vibration impacts that would result from the proposed project. THRESHOLDS OF SIGNIFICANCE Exterior Noise Standards Chapter 18, Article VI, Noise Control, of the Municipal Code provides criteria for ambient noise measurements as well as noise standards for residential, school, hospital, and church use. When non -transportation (stationary) noise is the noise source of concern, the City applies performance standards from Municipal Code Section 18.312, Exterior Noise Standards, to ensure that noise producers do not adversely affect noise -sensitive land uses. Table 6, Exterior Noise Standards, summarizes the City's exterior noise standards. Table 6 Exterior Noise Standards Time Period Noise Levels dBA L50 L25 Ls L2 Lmax 7:00 a.m. -10:00 p.m. 55 60 65 70 75 10:00 p.m. - 7:00 a.m. 50 55 60 65 70 Note: A 5 dBA penalty shall be applied in the event of an alleged offensive noise such as impact noise, simple tones, speech, music, or an combination of thereof. If the measured ambient level exceeds any of the first four noise limit categories, the allowable noise exposure standard shall be increased to reflect the ambient noise level. If the ambient noise level exceeds the fifth noise limit category, the maximum allowable noise level under this category shall be increased to reflect the maximum ambient noise level. Source: City of Santa Ana, Santa Ana Municipal Code, Section 18.312, Exterior Noise Standards. Dec i y ouncil 26 — 103 1/16/20'2 e43 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 Construction Noise Standards The City's noise ordinance exempts noise from construction activities that occur during the daytime. No construction is permitted outside of the hours identified in Municipal Code Section 18-314(e). Specifically, construction activities are restricted to the daytime hours of 7:00 am to 8:00 pm, Monday through Saturday. No construction activities are permitted on Sundays or federal holidays. Additionally, the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) established construction noise threshold of 80 dBA Leq for long-term construction projects, which is conservatively used to analyze the project's construction noise impact. Existing Conditions The project vicinity is characterized by mostly residential and commercial land uses, with urban - related activities (i.e., auto repair mechanical equipment and parking areas) being the primary sources of stationary noise. Most of the existing noise in the project area is generated from traffic along surrounding roadways including North Fairview Street and West 5th Street. Noise Measurements In order to quantify existing ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project site, Michael Baker International (Michael Baker) conducted three noise measurements on June 28, 2023; refer to Attachment B, Noise Data. The noise measurement sites were representative of typical existing noise exposure within and immediately adjacent to the project site. The three ten-minute measurements were taken between 11:00 a.m. and 12:00 p.m. Short-term (Leq) measurements are considered representative of the noise levels throughout the day and relate closely with the noise standards for the project area; refer to Table 7, Noise Measurements. Table 7 Noise Measurements Site No. Location Leq (dBA) Lmin (dBA) Lmax (dBA) Time 1 Northeast of Romero -Cruz Academy building 72.4 87.7 49.9 11:08 a.m. 2 Vista Heritage Global Academy 66.2 80.7 46.5 11:26 a.m. 3 1 Cul-de-sac of West 7th Street 1 51.1 1 79.6 1 41.1 1 11:45 a.m. Notes: dBA = A -weighted decibels, Leq = Equivalent Sound Level; Lmin = Minimum Sound Level; Lmax = Maximum Sound Level, Peak = Highest Instantaneous Sound Level Source: Michael Baker International, May 18, 2023. Meteorological conditions were partly cloudy skies, warm temperatures, with light wind speeds (6 miles per hour), and low humidity. Noise monitoring equipment used for the ambient noise survey consisted of a Bruel & Kjaer Hand-held Analyzer Type 2250 equipped with a Type 4189 pre - polarized microphone. The monitoring equipment complies with applicable requirements of the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) for sound level meters. Noise Sensitive Receptors Noise -sensitive land uses are generally considered to include those uses where noise exposure could result in health -related risks to individuals, as well as places where quiet is an essential element of their intended purpose. Residential dwellings are of primary concern because of the potential for increased and prolonged exposure of individuals to both interior and exterior noise levels. Additional land uses such as parks, historic sites, cemeteries, and recreation areas are considered sensitive to increases in exterior noise levels. Schools, churches, hotels, libraries, and Dec i y ouncil 26 — 104 1/16/20'2 e44 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 other places where low interior noise levels are essential are also considered noise -sensitive land uses. The closest sensitive receptors to the project site are residential uses located approximately 100 feet to the north of the project site and the existing Romero -Cruz Academy School is located approximately 100 feet to the west. PROJECT -GENERATED NOISE IMPACTS It is difficult to specify noise levels that are generally acceptable to everyone; noise that is considered a nuisance to one person may be unnoticed by another. Standards may be based on documented complaints in response to documented noise levels or based on studies of the ability of people to sleep, talk, or work under various noise conditions. Short-term Construction Impacts The project involves remodeling activities associated with paving, building construction, and architectural coating applications and would be completed in approximately eight months. Typical noise levels generated by construction equipment are shown in Table 8, Maximum Noise Levels Generated by Typical Construction Equipment. Operating cycles for these types of construction equipment may involve one or two minutes of full power operation followed by three to four minutes at lower power settings. Other primary sources of acoustical disturbance would be due to random incidents, which would last less than one minute (such as dropping large pieces of equipment or the hydraulic movement of machinery lifts). Construction noise levels in the project vicinity would fluctuate depending on the particular type, number, and duration of usage for the varying equipment. The effects of construction noise largely depend on the type of construction activities occurring on any given day, noise levels generated by those activities, distances to noise -sensitive receptors, and the existing ambient noise environment in the receptor's vicinity. Construction generally occurs in several discrete phases, with each phase requiring different equipment with varying noise characteristics. These phases alter the characteristics of the noise environment generated on the proposed project site and in the surrounding community for the duration of the construction process. Table 8 Maximum Noise Levels Generated by Typical Construction Equipment Type of Equipment Acoustical Use Factor' Lmax at 50 Feet (dBA) Lmax at 100 Feet dBA Compressor 40 78 72 Crane 40 82 75 Concrete Mixer Truck 40 76 73 Forklift 40 85 72 Paver 50 77 71 Roller 20 80 74 Tractor 40 84 78 Water Truck 40 80 1 1 74 Note: 1. Acoustical Use Factor (percent): Estimates the fraction of time each piece of construction equipment is operating at full power (i.e., its loudest condition) during a construction operation. Source: Federal Highway Administration, Roadway Construction Noise Model FHWA-HEP-05-054 , January 2006. Noise levels depicted in Table 8 represent maximum sound levels (Lmax), which are the highest individual sound occurring at an individual time period. The closest sensitive receptors to the Dec i y ouncil 26 — 105 1/16/202 e 45 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 project site are single-family residences and the Romero -Cruz Academy School located approximately 100 feet to the north and west of the project site, respectively. As shown in Table 8, construction noise levels could range between 71 dBA and 78 dBA at 100 feet. Although sensitive receptors may be exposed to increased noise levels during project construction, construction noise levels would not exceed the FTA threshold of 80 dBA. In addition, construction activities are exempt from the City's thresholds as it is a normal part in the urban life. Furthermore, compliance with RR NOI-2 would ensure that the project construction activities would comply with the City's Noise Ordinance detailed in Municipal Code Section 18-314(e) and occur only Monday through Saturday between 7:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. As such, project construction noise would be exempt from the City's noise standards and compliance with hours of construction activities would reduce impacts to less than significant in this regard. Long-term Operational Impacts Mobile Noise Implementation of the project would result in vehicle use on adjacent roadways, thereby increasing vehicular noise in the site vicinity. As determined by the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) in the Technical Noise Supplement to the Traffic Noise Analysis Protocol (September 2013), a doubling in roadway traffic volumes is required to generate any noticeable increase in roadway noise levels.22 According to the Vista Heritage Global Academy Expansion Trip Generation Assessment prepared by Urban Crossroads and dated July 24, 2023, the proposed project would generate 84 average daily trips without taking trip reductions from the existing uses as they are currently vacant. The nearest major roadway segment to the project vicinity is Fairview Street which currently experiences approximately 40,000 average daily trips.23 As such, the project's minimal trip generation (approximately 84 average daily trips) would not double existing traffic volumes along nearby roadways and an increase in traffic noise along local roadways would be imperceptible. Project -related traffic noise impacts would be less than significant. Stationary Noise Impacts Stationary noise sources associated with the proposed project would include mechanical equipment, parking activities, and outdoor play field areas. These noise sources are typically intermittent and short in duration. Noise has a decay rate due to distance attenuation, which is calculated based on the Inverse Square Law. Based upon the Inverse Square Law, sound levels decrease by 6 dBA for each doubling of distance from the source.24 All stationary noise activities would be required to comply with RR NOI-3 in accordance with the City's noise standards. Mechanical Equipment Heating Ventilation and Air Conditioning (HVAC) units typically generate noise levels of approximately 66 dBA Leq at three feet from the source.25 HVAC units are expected to be located 22 California Department of Transportation, Technical Noise Supplement to the Traffic Noise Analysis Protocol, September 2013. 21 City of Santa Ana, City of Santa Ana General Plan Circulation Element, https://storage.googleapis.com/proudcity/santaanaca/uploads/2022/04/Circulation-Element.pdf, accessed on July 28, 2023. 21 Cyril M. Harris, Noise Control in Buildings, 1994. 25 Berger, Elliott H., et al., Noise Navigator Sound Level Database with Over 1700 Measurement Values, June 26, 2015. Dec I y ouncil 26 — 106 1/16/20'2 e46 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 on the center of the rooftop and the closest sensitive receptor to the HVAC units is the existing Vista Charter Global Academy located at approximately 130 feet to the south. At the distance of 130 feet, HVAC noise levels would attenuate to approximately 33 dBA. Therefore, HVAC noise levels would be below the City's exterior daytime standards of 55 dBA and nighttime standards of 45 dBA in accordance with RR NOI-3 and would be lower than existing ambient noise levels of 66.2 dBA near the nearest sensitive receptor (Vista Charter Global Academy); refer to Table 7. Furthermore, HVAC equipment are already present on the rooftop of the existing building and the project would not introduce additional HVAC equipment. Therefore, the nearest sensitive receptors would not be directly exposed to substantial noise from on -site HVAC equipment and impacts would be less than significant. Parking Areas Traffic associated with parking activities is typically not of sufficient volume to exceed community noise standards, which are based on a time -averaged scale such as the CNEL scale. However, the instantaneous maximum sound levels generated by a car door slamming, engine starting up and car pass -by may be an annoyance to adjacent noise -sensitive receptors. Estimates of the maximum noise levels associated with some parking lot activities are presented in Table 9, Typical Noise Levels Generated by Parking Lots. Table 9 Typical Noise Levels Generated by Parking Lots Noise Source Maximum Noise Levels at 50 Feet from Source Car door slamming 61 dBA Uq Car starting 60 dBA Uq Car idling 53 dBA Uq Source: Kariel, H. G., Noise in Rural Recreational Environments, Canadian Acoustics 19(5), 3-10, 1991. The project would provide 63 parking spaces on -site. As shown in Table 9, parking activities can result in noise levels up to 61 dBA at a distance of 50 feet. The proposed project would have intermittent parking activities noise due to the movement of vehicles. The nearest sensitive receptors are the existing single-family residences located approximately 100 feet from the proposed parking spaces on the north of the project site. At this distance, noise levels from parking activities would range from 47 dBA to 55 dBA. As previously noted, parking lot noise are instantaneous noise levels compared to noise standards in the CNEL scale, which are averaged over time. As a result, actual noise levels over time resulting from parking lot activities would be far lower than what is identified above. Further, parking activity noise currently exists within the project site and would not represent a new source of noise. Impacts would be less than significant in this regard. Outdoor Play Area The proposed project proposes outdoor play areas along the northern boundary of the existing Vista Charter Global Academy building, in the southern portion of the project site. The play area has the potential to be accessed by groups of children intermittently for gathering, etc. Noise generated by groups of people (i.e., crowds) is dependent on several factors including vocal effort, impulsiveness, and the random orientation of the crowd members. Crowd noise is estimated at 60 dBA at one meter (3.28 feet) away for raised normal speaking.26 This noise level would have a +5 dBA adjustment for the impulsiveness of the noise source, and a -3 dBA adjustment for the 21 M.J. Hayne, et al, Prediction of Crowd Noise, Acoustics, November 2006. Dec i y ouncil 26 — 107 1/16/202 e47 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 random orientation of the crowd members.27 Therefore, crowd noise would be approximately 62 dBA at one meter from the source (i.e., the outdoor gathering areas). The nearest sensitive receptors would be the residential uses to the north of the project site, located approximately 200 feet from the proposed outdoor play areas. Therefore, crowd noise at the nearest sensitive receptor would be 26 dBA, which would not exceed the City's noise standards for residential uses in accordance with RR NOI-3 (i.e., 55 dBA for daytime and 45 dBA for nighttime) and would be lower than existing ambient noise levels of 51.1 dBA near the nearest sensitive receptors (residential uses to the north); refer to Table 7. As a result, noise generated from the outdoor play area would be further reduced. As such, project noise associated with outdoor play area would have a less than significant impact would occur in this regard. PROJECT -GENERATED VIBRATION IMPACTS Project construction activities can generate varying degrees of groundborne vibration, depending on the construction procedure and the construction equipment used. Operation of construction equipment generates vibrations that spread through the ground and diminish in amplitude with distance from the source. The effect on buildings located in the vicinity of the construction site often varies depending on soil type, ground strata, and construction characteristics of the receiver building(s). The results from vibration can range from no perceptible effects at the lowest vibration levels, to low rumbling sounds and perceptible vibration at moderate levels, to slight damage at the highest levels. Groundborne vibrations from construction activities rarely reach levels that damage structures. This evaluation uses the FTA architectural damage criterion for continuous vibrations of 0.3 in/sec PPV for engineered concrete and masonry. Typical vibration produced by construction equipment is illustrated in Table 10, Typical Vibration Levels for Construction Equipment. Table 10 Typical Vibration Levels for Construction Equipment Approximate peak particle velocity at Approximate peak particle velocity at Equipment 25 feet(inch/sec) 100 feet inch/sec) Large bulldozer 0.089 0.0111 Loaded trucks 0.076 0.0095 Small bulldozer 0.003 0.0004 Notes: 1. Calculated using the following formula: PPV equip = PPV ref x (25/D)f f where: PPV equip = the peak particle velocity in in/sec of the equipment adjusted for the distance PPV of = the reference vibration level in in/sec from Table 7-4 of the FTA Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Guidelines D = the distance from the equipment to the receiver Source: California Department of Transportation, Transportation and Construction Vibration Manual, April 2020. The nearest sensitive receptor structure is the existing single-family buildings located approximately 100 feet to the north of anticipated project site. As indicated in Table 10, vibration velocities from typical heavy construction equipment used during project construction would range from 0.0004 to 0.0111 in/sec PPV at 100 feet from the source of activity, which would not exceed the 0.3 in/sec PPV threshold. As such, the impacts would be less than significant. The proposed project use would not generate operational groundborne vibration that could be felt by surrounding uses. Additionally, the proposed project would not involve railroads or substantial 27 Ibid. Dec I y ouncil 26 — 108 1/16/20'2 e48 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 heavy truck operations, and therefore would not result in operational vibration impacts at surrounding uses. No impacts would occur in this regard. EXCESSIVE NOISE NEAR AIRPORTS The nearest airport to the project site is the John Wayne Airport located approximately five miles to the southeast. The project site is not located within two miles of the airport. Additionally, the project site is not located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or related facilities. Therefore, project implementation would not expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels associated with aircraft. As such, the impacts would be less than significant. NOISE IMPACTS TO ON -SITE SENSITIVE RECEPTORS The project site is located adjacent to an existing railroad alignment. The railroad is currently not operational and is being developed to build a fixed guideway system, OC Streetcar. Due to the proximity of the project site to the railroad alignment, future operations of the railroad have the potential to elevate existing noise levels, particularly during streetcar operations and crossing signal noise along Fairview Street located at approximately 90 feet from the project site. Based on the Santa Ana and Garden Grove Fixed Guideway Project Noise and Vibration Technical Report, prepared by URS Corporation and dated February 2012, noise from the operation of future streetcars have the potential to range from approximately 43 dBA Ldn during crossing activities to 59 dBA Ldn during blowing warning horn at approximately 100 feet. As such, exterior noise levels impacting the project site from the operation of future streetcars would not increase the existing ambient noise levels; refer to Table 7. Furthermore, future noise level impacts from OC Streetcar operations would be within the normally acceptable range of 50 to 70 dBA CNEL.28 As such, noise impacts to on -site sensitive receptors would be less than significant. 4.13.3 Conclusion As such, the project is consistent with buildout of the General Plan Update. Upon implementation of RR N0I-2 and N0I-3, the proposed project would not have any specific effects which are peculiar to the project or the site. There are no project specific impacts or potentially significant off -site or cumulative impacts the GPU EIR failed to analyze, and there are no new significant or substantially more severe impacts to noise and vibration than anticipated by the GPU EIR. Applicable GPU EIR Regulatory Requirements/Mitigation Measures: RR N0I-2 Construction Noise Sources: Section 18-314(e) of the Santa Ana Municipal code prohibits construction activities to the hours of 7:00 AM to 8:00 PM Monday through Saturday. RR N0I-3 Stationary Noise Sources: Section 18.312 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code establishes standards for stationary noise sources. 28 State of California Governor's Office of Planning and Research, General Plan Guidelines, Julv 2017. Dec i y ouncil 26 — 109 1/16/20'2 e49 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 4.14 Population and Housing 4.14.1 GPU EIR Findings The GPU EIR concluded that full buildout of the General Plan Update would result in a population of 431,629 and the City's 2045 population growth would be approximately 20 percent greater than the Orange County Council of Government (COG) 2045 population projections for the City. Furthermore, it is anticipated that General Plan Update buildout would result in 115,053 dwelling units, which exceeds the Orange County COG's housing projections for the City by 38 percent. As such, impacts are considered potentially significant. However, there are no feasible mitigation measures to mitigate the population and housing growth anticipated for the buildout of the General Plan Update. Further, the purpose of the General Plan Update is to provide orderly growth in the City through the distribution, location, balance, and extent of land uses, and the General Plan Update would provide more housing opportunities than currently exist during a time when there is a housing crisis. Still, impacts to population and housing were determined to be significant and unavoidable. 4.14.2 Project Analysis The project proposes to remodel and reoccupy a building formerly occupied by an automotive repair use as an office building for Vista Charter Public Schools. Vista Charter Public Schools operates six public charter schools in Los Angeles and Orange County and serves a total of 1,500 students. The proposed project creates an opportunity to have a district office located next to the organization's largest school, Vista Heritage Global Academy. While the headquarters would provide new office and conference space for employees of Vista Charter Public Schools, it is not anticipated that the project would generate new employment opportunities within the existing organization. Additionally, proposed outdoor areas would serve existing students of the adjoining Vista Heritage Global Academy and would not increase existing school capacity. As a result, the proposed project would not directly or indirectly result in substantial unplanned population growth in the area or displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing. Further, as discussed in Section 4.11, Land Use and Planning, the project would meet the design standards of the FLEX-1.5 designation and would be consistent with the applicable General Plan Update Land Use Element goals and policies. Therefore, consistent with the General Plan Update, less than significant impacts to population and housing would occur. 4.14.3 Conclusion As such, the project is consistent with of the General Plan Update. The proposed project would not have any specific effects which are peculiar to the project or the site. There are no project specific impacts or potentially significant off -site or cumulative impacts the GPU EIR failed to analyze, and there are no new significant or substantially more severe impacts to population and housing than anticipated by the GPU EIR. Applicable GPU EIR Regulatory Requirements/Mitigation Measures: No GPU EIR regulatory requirements or mitigation measures apply. 4.15 Public Services 4.15.1 GPU EIR Findings The GPU EIR concluded that introduction of new structures and additional residents and workers to the City would increase the demand for fire and police protection services. However, funding Dec i y ouncil 26 —110 1/16/202 e so Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 for additional staff, equipment, and facilities would come from property taxes, grants, special revenue funds, and the City's general fund as future development accommodated by the General Plan Update occurs. The additional demand for fire and police protection services due to population growth generated within the City would be satisfied through these sources. Additionally, the GPU EIR determined that school districts within the City would have the capacity to accommodate future students generated as a result of the proposed General Plan Update. Should there be a need to expand or construct new facilities, funding for new schools would be obtained from the mitigation fee program pursuant to Senate Bill (SB) 50, and State and federal funding programs. Pursuant to Section 65996 of the Government Code, payment of school fees is deemed to provide full and complete school facilities mitigation. Further, while library services would also experience an increase in demand, property taxes and library fines and fees are expected to satisfy this impact; overall, impacts would be less than significant. 4.15.2 Project Analysis As discussed above, buildout of General Plan Update is projected to increase the population of the City beyond growth projections. However, the project would not contribute to population growth as the proposed district office would serve existing employees and the outdoor recreation areas would serve existing students. As such, the proposed project would not increase demands on existing public services. Additionally, compliance with RR FP-1 would ensure that the proposed project would meet the fire regulations outlined in California Health and Safety Code, and RR SS- 1 would ensure that the proposed project would pay school development fees authorized by Section 65996 of the California Government Code. The project would also generate property tax which further fund fire and police protection services and library services. Therefore, consistent with the General Plan Update, less than significant impacts would occur. 4.15.3 Conclusion As such, the project is consistent with the General Plan Update. With implementation of RR FP- 1 and SS-1 identified in the GPU EIR, the proposed project would not have any specific effects which are peculiar to the project or the site. There are no project specific impacts or potentially significant off -site or cumulative impacts the GPU EIR failed to analyze, and there are no new significant or substantially more severe impacts to public services than anticipated by the GPU EIR. Applicable GPU EIR Regulatory Requirements/Mitigation Measures: RR FP-1 New buildings are required to meet the fire regulations outlined in California Health and Safety Code (Sections 13000 et seq.). RR SS-1 New residential and commercial development shall pay development fees authorized by Section 65996 of the California Government Code to be "full and complete school facilities mitigation." 4.16 Recreation 4.16.1 GPU EIR Findings The GPU EIR concluded that buildout of the General Plan Update would generate the demand for approximately 564 acres of parkland and recreational facilities assumed to serve the 2045 population. The City is essentially built -out and very limited vacant land is available to be developed with new recreational opportunities. New or expanded facilities would need to occur Dec i y ouncil 26 —111 1/16/202 e 51 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 outside of park -designated parcels and the development of these facilities may have an adverse physical effect on the environment, including impacts relating to air quality, biological resources, lighting, noise, and traffic. As such, it was determined that even with implementation of Mitigation Measure REC-1, which would require preparation of a public park utilization study, followed by further mitigation such as land dedication or fair shares contributions for projects resulting in a significant impact based on the study. impacts to recreation were determined to be significant and unavoidable. 4.16.2 Project Analysis As discussed, the project is not anticipated to generate population growth. As such, it is not anticipated that the project would increase demand on the City's existing parks or recreation facilities. Rather, the project proposes to redevelop the existing shared surface parking lot in the southern portion of the site into an outdoor area consisting of an approximately 2,297-square foot community garden, an approximately 7,372-square foot play field, and an approximately 4,640- square foot play yard. Outdoor areas would serve existing students of the adjoining Vista Heritage Global Academy and would not increase existing school capacity. As such, while the project does not provide additional public parkland, it would alleviate demand on existing City recreation facilities that may otherwise be utilized by the students. Environmental impacts associated with the construction of these outdoor areas are addressed in the respective topical sections of this document (i.e., aesthetics, air quality, biological resources, cultural resources, greenhouse gas emissions, noise, and transportation). Further, the proposed project would be required to either dedicate land or pay in -lieu impact fees per Municipal Code Chapter 34, Article VIII, and Chapter 35, Article IV as well as the Quimby Act. The fees collected would be used for development and improvement of public parks and recreation facilities throughout the City. Thus, the proposed project would not cause or accelerate substantial physical deterioration of existing parks or other recreational facilities nor include or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities that might have an adverse physical effect on the environment. Impacts would be less than significant. 4.16.3 Conclusion As such, the project is consistent with the General Plan Update. The proposed project would not have any specific effects which are peculiar to the project or the site. There are no project specific impacts or potentially significant off -site or cumulative impacts the GPU EIR failed to analyze, and there are no new significant or substantially more severe impacts to recreation than anticipated by the GPU EIR. Applicable GPU EIR Regulatory Requirements/Mitigation Measures: No GPU EIR regulatory requirements or mitigation measures apply. 4.17 Transportation 4.17.1 GPU EIR Findings The GPU EIR determined that buildout of the General Plan Update would not conflict with a program, plan, ordinance, or policy addressing the circulation system following implementation of RR T-1. RR T-1 requires design and operation of a multimodal circulation system network with all users in mind including bicyclists, public transportation vehicles and riders, and pedestrians of all ages and abilities. The General Plan Update incorporates future networks and policies related to supporting transit, bicycles, and pedestrians in the City, which are consistent with regional and local planning efforts supporting these modes of travel. Additionally, implementation of the Dec i y ouncil 26 —112 1/16/202 e 52 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 General Plan Update would result in a reduction of vehicle miles traveled (VMT) per service population in comparison to existing conditions at the time the GPU EIR was prepared and would achieve a VMT per service population of at least 15 percent lower than the Countywide VMT per service population. The GPU EIR also determined that buildout of the General Plan Update would not substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature or result in inadequate emergency access following implementation of RR T-2. RR T-2 requires projects pursuant to the General Plan Update to implement fire protection requirements as detailed in the Orange County Fire Authority's Fire Prevention Guidelines and the California Fire Code. 4.17.2 Project Analysis No changes are proposed to the existing circulation system in the project area and thus, the proposed project would not conflict with any program plan, ordinance or policy addressing the circulation system. According to the City of Santa Ana Traffic Impact Study Guidelines (City Traffic Guidelines), a project can be presumed to have a less -than -significant VMT impact if the project satisfies one of the following screening criteria: 29 • Projects which serve the local community and have the potential to reduce VMT, such as neighborhood K-12 schools and local -serving retail less than 50,000 sq. ft. (Charter schools are excluded from this criteria). • Projects that generate less than 110 net daily trips. • Projects located within Transit Priority Areas (TPAs); refer to City Traffic Guidelines Appendix A, Santa Ana Transit Priority Areas. • Projects located in a low-VMT generating Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ). City Traffic Guidelines Appendix B, VMT/SP in Santa Ana as Compared to Orange County Average, shows VMT per service population in Santa Ana as compared to the County average. Low-VMT TAZs per Santa Ana's threshold of significance are any TAZs generating VMT 15 percent below the County average. The proposed project would renovate the approximately 5,837-square foot former automotive repair building as the Vista Charter Public Schools district office. According to the Vista Heritage Global Academy Expansion Trip Generation Assessment (Trip Generation Memo), prepared by Urban Crossroads, Inc. and dated July 24, 2023, the proposed project would generate approximately 84 average daily trips with 14 morning peak hour trips and 12 afternoon peak hour trips; refer to Attachment C, Trip Generation Memo. Therefore, the proposed project would meet the screening criteria related to projects that generate less than 110 net daily trips. Additionally, according to City Traffic Guidelines Appendix A, Santa Ana Transit Priority Areas, the project site is located within a TPA, which is defined as a 0.5-mile radius around an existing or planned major transit stop (e.g., Metrolink Station, Streetcar Station, etc.) or an existing stop along a high -quality transit corridor. Thus, the project also meets the screening criteria related to projects located within TPAs. 29 City of Santa Ana, City of Santa Ana Traffic Impact Study Guidelines, September 2019. Dec i y ouncil 26 —113 1/16/20'2 e 53 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 Overall, the project meets two of the VMT screening requirements and thus, no VMT analysis would be required. The project is presumed to have a less than significant VMT impact. Additionally, the project does not propose any changes to the City's existing circulation system and would not introduce incompatible uses to area roadways. The site is accessible from North Fairview Street via two driveways to the west, and two alleys connecting to West 5th Street to the south and southeast. Site access would not change as part of the proposed project. Additionally, the proposed project is not anticipated to require road closures during project construction as all proposed improvements would occur within the project boundary. 4.17.3 Conclusion Overall, the project is consistent with the General Plan Update. The proposed project would not have any specific effects which are peculiar to the project or the site. There are no project -specific impacts or potentially significant off -site or cumulative impacts the GPU EIR failed to analyze, and there are no new significant or substantially more severe transportation impacts than anticipated by the GPU EIR. Applicable GPU EIR Regulatory Requirements/Mitigation Measures: No GPU EIR regulatory requirements or mitigation measures apply. 4.18 Tribal Cultural Resources 4.18.1 GPU EIR Findings The City consulted with applicable Native American tribes in accordance with Senate Bill (SB) 18 and Assembly Bill (AB) 52. Given that tribal cultural resources are site -specific in nature. Future development allowed under the General Plan Update could potentially impact and cause significant adverse impacts to tribal cultural resources. Thus, Mitigation Measures CUL-4 through CUL-7 would reduce such impacts to less than significant levels. Specifically, to reduce impacts to archaeological resources and prior to ground -disturbing activities, Mitigation Measure CUL-4 requires an Archaeological Resources Assessment be conducted under the supervision of an archaeologist that meets the Secretary of the Interior's Professionally Qualified Standards in either prehistoric or historic archaeology. If potentially significant archaeological resources are identified and impacts cannot be avoided, Mitigation Measure CUL-5 requires a Phase II Testing and Evaluation investigation be performed by an archaeologist meeting the Secretary of the Interior's Standards to determine the significance of the resource(s). Per Mitigation Measure CUL- 6, if the Archaeological Resources Assessment does not identify archaeological resources but indicates the project area to be highly sensitive for archeological resources, a qualified archaeologist and a Native American monitor culturally affiliated with the project area must monitor all ground -disturbing activities in the areas of high archaeological sensitivity. In the event that archaeological resources (artifacts or features) are exposed during ground -disturbing activities, construction activities in the immediate vicinity of the discovery must halt while the resources are evaluated for significance by a qualified archaeologist. Pursuant to Mitigation Measure CUL-7, if the Archaeological Resources Assessment does not identify potentially significant archaeological resources but the site has moderate sensitivity for archaeological resources, an archaeologist meeting the Secretary's Standards must be retained on -call. The archaeologist must inform all construction personnel prior to construction activities about the proper procedures in the event of an archaeological discovery. Overall, the GPU EIR determined that implementation of Mitigation Measures CUL-4 through CUL-7 would reduce tribal cultural resources impacts to less than significant levels. Dec i y ouncil 26 —114 1/16/20'2 e 54 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 4.18.2 Project Analysis Although the project would redevelop the shared surface parking lot in the southern portion of the site into an outdoor community garden, play field, and play yard, the proposed project would not require extensive excavation that could uncover previously undiscovered tribal cultural resources. Typical excavation depth would be a maximum of four feet for the majority of the site with the deepest excavation of approximately eight feet for an underground infiltration chamber related to stormwater improvements. No new or substantially more severe impacts would occur compared to the determinations of the GPU EIR, and no new mitigation measures are required. 4.18.3 Conclusion Overall, the project is consistent with the General Plan Update. The proposed project would not have any specific effects which are peculiar to the project or the site. There are no project -specific impacts or potentially significant off -site or cumulative impacts the GPU EIR failed to analyze, and there are no new significant or substantially more severe tribal cultural resource impacts than anticipated by the GPU EIR. Applicable GPU EIR Regulatory Requirements/Mitigation Measures: No GPU EIR regulatory requirements or mitigation measures apply. 4.19 Utilities and Service Systems 4.19.1 GPU EIR Findings The GPU EIR concluded that increased sewer flow from buildout of the General Plan Update would require pipe upsizing to meet the demands of new residential and commercial uses; however, the Orange County Sanitation District Master Plan accounts for trunk line improvements and the Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD), in general, has a functioning and effective process in place to ensure the regional sewer infrastructure is able to support future developments in the City. Further, OCSD confirmed that wastewater generated by buildout of the General Plan Update would be adequately treated by Treatment Plant No. 1. The GPU EIR also concluded sufficient Orange County Water District water supplies and Orange County Public Works stormwater drainage facilities would be available to serve the full General Plan Update buildout from existing entitlements and resources, and new or expanded entitlements would not be required beyond those improvements already planned for the City. 4.19.2 Project Analysis Based on wastewater generation rates for commercial uses in the West Santa Ana Focus Area, contained within Volume III, Appendix H-a, of the GPU EIR, the proposed project would generate approximately 2,036 gallons of wastewater per day.30 The proposed project would connect to existing wastewater infrastructure, which would have the capacity to serve the project demand in addition to existing service commitments and would not require the expansion of existing facilities. Compliance with RR U-2 would ensure that OCSD connection fees are paid in accordance with Ordinance No. OCSD-40. Additionally, as discussed above, runoff from the proposed project is currently collected by stormwater drainage facilities in the surrounding roadway. The proposed project would implement BMPs contained in the WQMP to capture and infiltrate stormwater runoff. 30 Based on a rate of 2,262 gallons of wastewater per day per acre for a 0.9-acre site. The GPU EIR separated land uses into either residential or commercial in order to determine average wastewater generation. While it is acknowledged that the proposed project would involve office use, commercial rates were deemed most appropriate in order to compare the proposed project to the analysis contained within the GPU EIR. Dec I y ouncil 26 —115 1/16/202 e 55 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 Any runoff leaving the project site would continue to drain to the existing drain inlets in the project area, and the proposed project would not require or result in the construction of new or expanded storm water drainage facilities. Based on water demand rates for commercial uses, contained within Volume III, Appendix H-b, of the GPU EIR, the proposed project would require approximately 2,250 gallons of water per day, which would be met by the City's supplies.31 However, compliance with RR U-5 would ensure that the project is designed pursuant to the water conservation and efficiency requirements of the Municipal Code, and RR U-6 would ensure water connection fees are paid. Therefore, consistent with the General Plan Update, impacts related to water supplies, wastewater treatment, and storm water drainage from the proposed project would be less than significant. The proposed project would generate a nominal amount of solid waste during construction activities. However, the proposed project would comply with the CALGreen Building Code Standards, which requires that at least 65 percent of nonhazardous construction and demolition waste generated during most new construction be recycled and/or salvaged for reuse. During operations, the proposed project would generate approximately 34.8 pounds of solid waste per day, typical of office uses.32,33 According to the GPU EIR, solid waste generated in the City is transferred to Orange County solid waste landfill system which has ample capacity to accommodate increased volumes of waste from the City through 2053. Furthermore, the proposed project would be required to comply with the requirements of AB 341, which mandates recycling for commercial land uses, and AB 1826, which requires that any organic waste generated in amounts over a certain threshold would be recycled. Therefore, the proposed project would not generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards or of the future capacity of local infrastructure, and would comply with all applicable federal, State, and local solid waste regulations. Consistent with the General Plan Update, impacts would be less than significant. The site is currently served by SCE and Southern California Gas Company (SoCalGas). Project impacts with regards to electricity and natural gas services would be nominal given that operations of the proposed office would utilize minimal electricity and natural gas. As summarized under Section 4.6, Energy, the project would not result in substantial energy consumption, upon compliance with existing regulatory requirements, including the 2022 Title 24 Building Energy Efficiency Standards and 2012 Appliance Efficiency Regulations pursuant to RR E-3 and E-4. Additionally, the project would be required to pay connection and ongoing user fees to SCE and SoCalGas to offset project impacts on existing dry utility services and resources. Thus, impacts with regards to dry utilities would be less than significant. 4.19.3 Conclusion As such, the project is consistent with the General Plan Update. With implementation of RR U-2, U-5, U-6, HYD-4, and HYD-5 identified in the GPU EIR, the proposed project would not have any specific effects which are peculiar to the project or the site. There are no project specific impacts or potentially significant off -site or cumulative impacts the GPU EIR failed to analyze, and there are no new significant or substantially more severe impacts to utilities and service systems than anticipated by the GPU EIR. 31 Based on a rate of 2,500 gallons of water per day per acre for a 0.9-acre site. The GPU EIR separated land uses into either residential or commercial in order to determine average water demand. While it is acknowledged that the proposed project would involve office use, commercial rates were deemed most appropriate in order to compare the proposed project to the analysis contained within the GPU EIR. 32 Based on a rate of 0.006 pounds of solid waste per day per square foot for a 5,800square foot office building. 33 CalRecycle, Estimated Solid Waste Generation Rates, https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/wastecharacterization/general/rates, accessed August 10, 2023. Dec I y ouncil 26 —116 1/16/202 e 56 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 Applicable GPU EIR Regulatory Requirements/Mitigation Measures: Refer to Section 4.6, Energy, for RR E-3 and EA and Section 4.10, Hydrology and Water Quality, for RR HYD-4 and HYD-5. RR U-2 Any new connections to the Orange County Sanitation District system or expansion of a previous connection shall pay a capital facilities charge in accordance with Ordinance No. OCSD-40. RR U-5 Any development implemented under the General Plan Update shall abide by the water conservation and efficiency requirements detailed in Chapter 8, Article XVI, Chapter 39, Article VI and Chapter 41, Article XVI of the Santa Ana Municipal Code. RR U-6 Water connection fees shall be paid in accordance with Chapter 39, Article II of the City's Municipal Code and plumbing shall be installed in compliance with Chapter 8, Article III. 4.20 Wildfire 4.20.1 GPU EIR Findings The GPU EIR concludes that buildout of the General Plan Update would not substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan, exacerbate wildfire risks thereby creating elevated particulate concentration exposure to people, nor would it expose people or structures to significant risks. The General Plan Update would require the installation and maintenance of associated infrastructure in areas that are undeveloped or vacant which could exacerbate fire risk. 4.20.2 Project Analysis The CEQA Guidelines require analysis of wildfire risk in State responsibility areas (SRAs) and/or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones. As stated in the GPU EIR, the nearest fire hazard severity zone (FHSZ) in an SRA to the City of Santa Ana is a high FHSZ about four miles east along the western edge of Loma Ridge. The nearest FHSZ in a local responsibility area (LRA) is about 3.8 miles at the southern tip of the Peters Canyon Regional Park. Therefore, the project site is not in or near SRAs or lands classified as very high FHSZs. Additionally, no area in the City is a wildland-urban interface. As such, no impact related to wildfire risk would occur due to development of the proposed project. 4.20.3 Conclusion As such, the project is consistent with the General Plan Update. The proposed project would not have any specific effects which are peculiar to the project or the site. There are no project specific impacts or potentially significant off -site or cumulative impacts the GPU EIR failed to analyze, and there are no new significant or substantially more severe impacts to wildfire than anticipated by the GPU EIR. Applicable GPU EIR Regulatory Requirements/Mitigation Measures: No GPU EIR regulatory requirements or mitigation measures apply. Dec i y ouncil 26 —117 1/16/20'2 e 57 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 5. Findings As discussed in Section 3.0, the City of Santa Ana intends to pursue a CEQA exemption for the proposed project pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15183. As stated in CEQA Guidelines Section 15183(d), the exemption requires a project to meet the following conditions: 1. The project is consistent with: a. A community plan adopted as part of a general plan, b. A zoning action which zoned or designated the parcel on which the project would be located to accommodate a particular density of development, or c. A general plan of a local agency, and 2. An EIR was certified by the lead agency for the zoning action, the community plan, or the general plan. The General Plan Update and GPU EIR were adopted and certified by the Santa Ana City Council in 2022. The project site is located within the General Plan Update West Santa Ana Boulevard Focus Area. This portion of the City was historically a more industrial area; the General Plan Update intends to transition the area from a group of auto -oriented neighborhoods, businesses, and institutions into a series of transit -oriented neighborhoods that support and benefit from future streetcar stops. Additionally, the industrial portion of the focus area (where the project site is located) is envisioned and designated Industrial/Flex (FLEX) to promote new opportunities, including new clean industrial/manufacturing, maker -type spaces, and other uses that are more compatible with the surrounding residential areas than traditional industrial uses. The project site has a land use designation of Industrial/Flex-Low (FLEX-1.5), which is intended for office/industrial flex spaces, small-scale research and development, clean manufacturing, and live -work uses. The proposed project would redevelop a former automotive repair building into a school district office, which is a permitted use under the FLEX-1.5 designation and considered in the analysis of the GPU EIR. Additionally, the General Plan Update encourages adaptive reuse of existing industrial buildings within this focus area, which would be achieved with implementation of the project. As such, the GPU EIR adequately anticipated and analyzed the impacts of this project, identified applicable mitigation measures necessary to reduce impacts of the project, and the project implements the applicable mitigation measures. The project, therefore, qualifies for an exemption from additional environmental review as set forth in CEQA Guidelines Section 15183. Overall, the project qualifies for the exemption because the following findings can be made: a) The project is consistent with the development density established by existing zoning, community plan or general plan policies for which an EIR was certified. Based on General Plan Update Land Use Element Figure LU-1, Land Use Map, the project site is designated Industrial/Flex-Low (FLEX-1.5). The FLEX-1.5 designation allows a maximum 1.5 FAR and/or 30 dwelling per acre, with a maximum building height of three stories. The proposed project would renovate the approximately 5,837-square foot former automotive repair building as the Vista Charter Public Schools district office. The project site is approximately 0.9-acre. Thus, the project would result in a 0.15 FAR. Additionally, the building would maintain its existing building height of approximately 19.3 feet. Thus, the proposed project would be consistent with the site's FLEX-1.5 designation development density established by the General Dec i y ouncil 26 -118 1/16/202 e 58 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 Plan Update. Additionally, the project would be consistent with applicable General Plan Update Land Use Element policies as detailed in Table 5. Overall, the project would be consistent with Criterion A. b) There are no project specific effects which are peculiar to the project or its site. The project site is located within the Fairview Business Park in an industrial area of Santa Ana. The Fairview Business Park is currently developed with institutional (Vista Heritage Global Academy and Templo Calvario Church), industrial, and office uses. As stated, the site's FLEX- 1.5 land use designation is intended to provide context -appropriate development in areas with existing industrial uses. The proposed Vista Charter Public Schools district office and outdoor open space areas would complement and serve the existing Vista Heritage Global Academy located adjacent to the site's southern boundary. Additionally, upon approval of the required Zone Change and Zoning Ordinance Amendment, project development would be required to comply with applicable standards for the SD-82 zone, which is consistent with the standards for Light Industrial uses in Municipal Code Sections 41-473 through 41-481. As such, the proposed project would not result in effects which are peculiar to the project or its site and the project would be consistent with Criterion B. c) There are no project specific impacts which the prior EIR failed to analyze as significant effects. The GPU EIR concluded that buildout of the General Plan Update would result in a total of 115,053 residential units and 72,967,816 square feet of non-residential development by 2045. The proposed project, which is consistent with the General Plan Update, involves renovating an existing 5,837-square foot building and developing outdoor open space areas on an approximately 0.9-acre site. The project would meet the development density requirement for the FLEX-1.5 designation and thus, was considered in the planned development of the General Plan Update and would have similar or lesser significant impacts than analyzed in the GPU EIR. As discussed in Section 4.0, there are no project specific impacts which the GPU EIR failed to analyze as significant effects. The proposed project is consistent with Criterion C. d) There are no potentially significant off -site and/or cumulative impacts which the prior EIR failed to evaluate. As stated, buildout of the proposed project is consistent with the General Plan Update and thus, was considered in the GPU EIR analysis. No off -site improvements are proposed in the project area and the size and nature of the project would not result in cumulatively considerable environmental impacts. Overall, there are no potentially significant off -site and/or cumulative impacts which the GPU EIR failed to evaluate. The project is consistent with Criterion D. e) There is no substantial new information which results in more severe impacts than anticipated by the prior EIR. As discussed in Section 4.0, the proposed project would result in similar and/or lesser impacts than the GPU EIR. There is no substantial new information which result in more severe impacts than anticipated by the GPU EIR. Therefore, the proposed project is consistent with Criterion E. As shown, the proposed project is consistent with Criteria A through E under CEQA Guidelines Section 15183. As such, the proposed project qualifies for the CEQA exemption. Dec i y ouncil 26 —119 1/16/20'2 e 59 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 REFERENCES Berger, Elliott H., et al., Noise Navigator Sound Level Database with Over 1700 Measurement Values, June 26, 2015. California Air Resources Board, 2022 Scoping Plan, November 16, 2022. California Air Resources Board, Air Quality and Land Use Handbook: A Community Health Perspective, April 2005. California Air Resources Board, Air Quality and Meteorological Information, https://www.arb.ca.gov/agmis2/agdselect.php?tab=specialrpt, accessed July 3, 2023. California Department of Conservation, California Important Farmland Finder, https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/DLRP/CIFF/, accessed June 29, 2023. California Department of Conservation, California Williamson Act Enrollment Finder, https://gis.conservation.ca.gov/portal/home/webmap/viewer.html?webmap=l 8f7488cOa9 d4d299f5e9c33b312f312, accessed July 26, 2023. California Department of Conservation Division of Mines and Geology, A General Location Guide for Ultramafic Rocks in California — Areas More Likely to Contain Naturally Occurring Asbestos Report, August 2000, https:Hww3.arb.ca.gov/toxics/asbestos/ofr_2000-019.pdf, accessed April 3, 2023. California Department of Transportation, Technical Noise Supplement to the Traffic Noise Analysis Protocol, September 2013. California Department of Transportation, Transportation and Construction Vibration Manual, April 2020. California Environmental Protection Agency, Cortese Listing, https://calepa.ca.gov/sitecleanup/corteselist/, accessed July 6, 2023. CalRecycle, Estimated Solid Waste Generation Rates, https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/wastecharacterization/general/rates, accessed August 10, 2023. CalRecycle, Green Building Materials, https://www.calrecycle.ca.gov/greenbuiIding/materials#Material, accessed August 15, 2023. California Natural Resources Agency, Final Statement of Reasons for Regulatory Action, pp. 11- 13, 14, 16, December 2009, https://resources.ca.gov/CNRALegacyFiles/ceqa/docs/Final_Statement_of_Reasons.pdf , accessed July 13, 2023. City of Santa Ana, City of Santa Ana Climate Action Plan, December 2015. City of Santa Ana, City of Santa Ana Traffic Impact Study Guidelines, September 2019. City of Santa Ana, City of Santa Ana Zoning Map, March 4, 2021. Dec i y ouncil 26 — 120 1/16/20'2 e 60 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 City of Santa Ana, Golden City Beyond, Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Element, Figure LU- 1, Land Use Map, April 2022. City of Santa Ana, City of Santa Ana General Plan Circulation Element, https://storage.googleapis.com/proudcity/santaanaca/uploads/2022/04/Circulation- Element.pdf, accessed on July 28, 2023. City of Santa Ana, Santa Ana Municipal Code, codified through Ordinance No. NS-3049, adopted July 18, 2023. Cyril M. Harris, Noise Control in Buildings, 1994. Federal Highway Administration, Roadway Construction Noise Model (FHWA-HEP-05-054), January 2006. International Code Council, 2022 California Building Code, Title 24, Part 2, https://codes.iccsafe.org/content/CABC2022Pl /chapter-18-soils-and-foundations, accessed July 26, 2023. Kariel, H. G., Noise in Rural Recreational Environments, Canadian Acoustics 19(5), 3-10, 1991. M.J. Hayne, et al, Prediction of Crowd Noise, Acoustics, November 2006. South Coast Air Quality Management District, Draft Guidance Document — Interim CEQA Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Significance Threshold, October 2008. South Coast Air Quality Management District, Health Risk Assessment Guidance for Analyzing Cancer Risks from Mobile Source Diesel Emissions, December 2002. South Coast Air Quality Management District, Rule 1113 Architectural Coatings, http://www.agmd.gov/docs/default-source/rule-book/reg-xi/r1113.pdf, accessed June 15, 2023. Southern California Association of Governments, 2020-2045 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy — Connect SoCal, September 3, 2020. State of California Governor's Office of Planning and Research, Transmittal of the Governor's Office of Planning and Research's Proposed SB97 CEQA Guidelines Amendments to the Natural Resources Agency, April 13, 2009, https://planning.lacity.org/eir/CrossroadsHwd/deir/files/references/COl.pdf, accessed July 13, 2023. Urban Crossroads, Inc., Vista Heritage Global Academy Expansion Trip Generation Assessment, July 24, 2023. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Corps reclassifies Prado Damn, implements risk -reduction measures, https://www.spl.usace. army.mil/Media/News-Releases/Article/l849301/corps- reclassifies-prado-dam-implements-risk-reduction-measures/, May 15, 2019. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Carbon Monoxide Emissions, https://cfpub.epa.gov/roe/indicator—pdf.cfm?i=10, accessed July 3, 2023. Dec i y ouncil 26 — 121 1/16/202 e 61 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Web Soil Survey, https://websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov/app/WebSoilSurvey.aspx, accessed July 26, 2023. Dec i y ouncil 26 — 122 1/16/20'2 e 62 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 ATTACHMENT A AIR QUALITY/GREENHOUSE GAS/ENERGY MODELING RESULTS City Council 26 — 123 1/16/2024 Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report Table of Contents 1. Basic Project Information 1.1. Basic Project Information 1.2. Land Use Types 1.3. User -Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector 2. Emissions Summary 2.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against Thresholds 2.2. Construction Emissions by Year, Unmitigated 2.3. Construction Emissions by Year, Mitigated 2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds 2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated 2.6. Operations Emissions by Sector, Mitigated 3. Construction Emissions Details 3.1. Building Construction (2023) - Unmitigated 3.2. Building Construction (2023) - Mitigated City Council 26 — 124 1 / 63 1 /16/2024 Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 3.3. Building Construction (2024) - Unmitigated 3.4. Building Construction (2024) - Mitigated 3.5. Paving (2024) - Unmitigated 3.6. Paving (2024) - Mitigated 3.7. Architectural Coating (2024) - Unmitigated 3.8. Architectural Coating (2024) - Mitigated 4. Operations Emissions Details 4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use 4.1.1. Unmitigated 4.1.2. Mitigated 4.2. Energy 4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated 4.2.2. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Mitigated 4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated 4.2.4. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Mitigated 4.3. Area Emissions by Source 4.3.2. Unmitigated City Council 26 — 125 2/63 1 /16/2024 Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 4.3.1. Mitigated 4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use 4.4.2. Unmitigated 4.4.1. Mitigated 4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use 4.5.2. Unmitigated 4.5.1. Mitigated 4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use 4.6.1. Unmitigated 4.6.2. Mitigated 4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type 4.7.1. Unmitigated 4.7.2. Mitigated 4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type 4.8.1. Unmitigated 4.8.2. Mitigated 4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type City Council 26 — 126 3/63 1 /16/2024 Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 4.9.1. Unmitigated 4.9.2. Mitigated 4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type 4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated 4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated 4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated 4.10.4. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Mitigated 4.10.5. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Mitigated 4.10.6. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Mitigated 5. Activity Data 5.1. Construction Schedule 5.2. Off -Road Equipment 5.2.1. Unmitigated 5.2.2. Mitigated 5.3. Construction Vehicles 5.3.1. Unmitigated 5.3.2. Mitigated City Council 26 — 127 4/63 1 /16/2024 Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 5.4. Vehicles 5.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control Strategies 5.5. Architectural Coatings 5.6. Dust Mitigation 5.6.1. Construction Earthmoving Activities 5.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control Strategies 5.7. Construction Paving 5.8. Construction Electricity Consumption and Emissions Factors 5.9. Operational Mobile Sources 5.9.1. Unmitigated 5.9.2. Mitigated 5.10. Operational Area Sources 5.10.1. Hearths 5.10.1.1. Unmitigated 5.10.1.2. Mitigated 5.10.2. Architectural Coatings 5.10.3. Landscape Equipment City Council 26 — 128 5/63 1 /16/2024 Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 5.10.4. Landscape Equipment - Mitigated 5.11. Operational Energy Consumption 5.11.1. Unmitigated 5.11.2. Mitigated 5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption 5.12.1. Unmitigated 5.12.2. Mitigated 5.13. Operational Waste Generation 5.13.1. Unmitigated 5.13.2. Mitigated 5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment 5.14.1. Unmitigated 5.14.2. Mitigated 5.15. Operational Off -Road Equipment 5.15.1. Unmitigated 5.15.2. Mitigated 5.16. Stationary Sources City Council 26 — 129 6/63 1 /16/2024 Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 5.16.1. Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps 5.16.2. Process Boilers 5.17. User Defined 5.18. Vegetation 5.18.1. Land Use Change 5.18.1.1. Unmitigated 5.18.1.2. Mitigated 5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type 5.18.1.1. Unmitigated 5.18.1.2. Mitigated 5.18.2. Sequestration 5.18.2.1. Unmitigated 5.18.2.2. Mitigated 6. Climate Risk Detailed Report 6.1. Climate Risk Summary 6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores 6.3. Adjusted Climate Risk Scores City Council 26 — 130 7/63 1 /16/2024 Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 6.4. Climate Risk Reduction Measures 7. Health and Equity Details 7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores 7.2. Healthy Places Index Scores 7.3. Overall Health & Equity Scores 7.4. Health & Equity Measures 7.5. Evaluation Scorecard 7.6. Health & Equity Custom Measures 8. User Changes to Default Data City Council 26 — 131 8/63 1 /16/2024 Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 1. Basic Project Information 1.1. Basic Project Information Project Name Construction Start Date Operational Year Lead Agency Land Use Scale Analysis Level for Defaults Windspeed (m/s) Precipitation (days) Location County City Air District Air Basin TAZ EDFZ Electric Utility Gas Utility App Version • 11•' -191 Land Use Subtype L;� Vista Charter School Expansion 11 /1 /2023 2024 Project/site County 2.50 18.6 Santa Ana, CA, USA Orange Santa Ana South Coast AQMD South Coast 5990 7 Southern California Edison Southern California Gas 2022.1.1.14 9/63 Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 General Office 7.00 1000sgft 0.16 7,000 2,297 Building 1.3. User -Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector Construction C-10-C Construction C-11 Construction C-12 2. Emissions Summary 2.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against Thresholds Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Unmit. 0.70 0.89 4.59 6.38 0.01 0.21 0.23 0.44 0.19 0.05 0.25 - Mit. 0.70 0.89 4.59 6.38 0.01 0.21 0.23 0.44 0.19 0.05 0.25 - Reduced Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Unmit. 0.71 0.59 5.98 7.14 0.01 0.28 0.23 0.44 0.26 0.05 0.27 - Mit. 0.71 0.59 5.98 7.14 0.01 0.28 0.23 0.44 0.26 0.05 0.27 - Reduced Water Unpaved Construction Roads Limit Vehicle Speeds on Unpaved Roads Sweep Paved Roads 1,061 1,061 0.04 0.01 0.97 1,067 1,061 1,061 0.04 0.01 0.97 1,067 1,372 1,372 0.06 0.02 0.03 1,378 1,372 1,372 0.06 0.02 0.03 1,378 City Council 26 - 133 1/16/2024 10/63 Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily (Max) Unmit. 0.18 0.24 1.31 1.71 < 0.005 0.06 0.03 0.09 0.05 0.01 0.06 - Mit. 0.18 0.24 1.31 1.71 < 0.005 0.06 0.03 0.09 0.05 0.01 0.06 - Reduced Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - (Max) Unmit. 0.03 0.04 0.24 0.31 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 0.01 - Mit. 0.03 0.04 0.24 0.31 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 0.01 - Reduced 2.2. Construction Emissions by Year, Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Daily - - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) 2024 0.70 0.89 4.59 6.38 0.01 0.21 0.23 0.44 0.19 0.05 0.25 - Daily - - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) 2023 0.71 0.59 5.98 7.14 0.01 0.28 0.04 0.32 0.26 0.01 0.27 - 2024 0.70 0.59 5.65 7.11 0.01 0.26 0.23 0.44 0.24 0.05 0.25 - Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily 2023 0.08 0.07 0.71 0.85 < 0.005 0.03 < 0.005 0.04 0.03 < 0.005 0.03 - 2024 0.18 0.24 1.31 1.71 < 0.005 0.06 0.03 0.09 0.05 0.01 0.06 - Annual - G-ity Cou-ncil - - - - -26 - 1-34 - - - 11 / 63 301 301 0.01 < 0.005 0.06 303 301 301 0.01 < 0.005 0.06 303 49.9 49.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 50.1 49.9 49.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 50.1 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e 1,061 1,061 0.04 0.01 0.97 1,067 1,372 1,372 0.06 0.02 0.01 1,378 1,371 1,371 0.06 0.02 0.03 1,377 164 164 0.01 < 0.005 0.01 165 301 301 0.01 < 0.005 0.06 303 - - - 1 /1-&/2024 - - Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 2023 0.02 0.01 0.13 0.16 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 0.01 - 2024 0.03 0.04 0.24 0.31 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 0.01 - 2.3. Construction Emissions by Year, Mitigated Criteria Pollutants(lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual and GHGs(lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual Daily - - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) 2024 0.70 0.89 4.59 6.38 0.01 0.21 0.23 0.44 0.19 0.05 0.25 - Daily - - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) 2023 0.71 0.59 5.98 7.14 0.01 0.28 0.04 0.32 0.26 0.01 0.27 - 2024 0.70 0.59 5.65 7.11 0.01 0.26 0.23 0.44 0.24 0.05 0.25 - Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily 2023 0.08 0.07 0.71 0.85 < 0.005 0.03 < 0.005 0.04 0.03 < 0.005 0.03 - 2024 0.18 0.24 1.31 1.71 < 0.005 0.06 0.03 0.09 0.05 0.01 0.06 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - 2023 0.02 0.01 0.13 0.16 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 0.01 - 2024 0.03 0.04 0.24 0.31 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 0.01 - 2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer KA ..\ 27.1 27.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 27.2 49.9 49.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 50.1 1,061 1,061 0.04 0.01 0.97 1,067 1,372 1,372 0.06 0.02 0.01 1,378 1,371 1,371 0.06 0.02 0.03 1,377 164 164 0.01 < 0.005 0.01 165 301 301 0.01 < 0.005 0.06 303 27.1 27.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 27.2 49.9 49.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 50.1 City Council 26 - 135 12/63 1 /16/2024 Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Unmit. 0.35 0.49 0.23 2.30 < 0.005 0.01 0.40 0.41 0.01 0.10 0.11 5.89 709 715 0.64 0.03 1.87 741 Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Unmit. 0.30 0.44 0.24 1.89 < 0.005 0.01 0.40 0.41 0.01 0.10 0.11 5.89 691 696 0.64 0.03 0.07 721 Average - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily (Max) Unmit. 0.26 0.40 0.20 1.66 < 0.005 0.01 0.30 0.31 0.01 0.08 0.08 5.89 585 591 0.63 0.02 0.62 614 Annual- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (Max) Unmit. 0.05 0.07 0.04 0.30 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 0.06 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 0.98 96.8 97.8 0.10 < 0.005 0.10 102 2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/dav for dailv. ton/vr for annual) and GHGs (lb/dav for dailv. MT/vr for annual) Daily, Summer (Max) Mobile 0.29 0.27 0.18 1.95 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.40 0.41 < 0.005 0.10 0.11 - 457 457 0.02 0.02 1.86 465 Area 0.05 0.22 < 0.005 0.30 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - 1.25 1.25 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 1.26 Energy 0.01 < 0.005 0.05 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - 239 239 0.02 < 0.005 - 240 Water - - - - - - - - - - - 2.38 12.6 15.0 0.25 0.01 - 22.8 Waste - - - - - - - - - - - 3.51 0.00 3.51 0.35 0.00 - 12.3 Refrig. - - - - - - - - - - - - 0.02 0.02 Total 0.35 0.49 0.23 2.30 < 0.005 0.01 0.40 0.41 0.01 0.10 0.11 5.89 709 715 0.64 0.03 1.87 741 Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Mobile 0.29 n 97 n 9n 1 aF < n nns < n nns n 4n n 41 < n nns n i n n 11 - 4�a 41a n ni n ro 0.05 446 City Council 26 - 136 1/16/2024 13/63 Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Area - 0.17 - - Energy 0.01 < 0.005 0.05 0.04 Water - - - - Waste - - - - Refrig. - - - - Total 0.30 0.44 0.24 1.89 Average - - - - Daily Mobile 0.22 0.20 0.15 1.41 Area 0.04 0.20 < 0.005 0.21 Energy 0.01 < 0.005 0.05 0.04 Water - - - - Waste - - - - Refrig. - - - - Total 0.26 0.40 0.20 1.66 Annual - - - - Mobile 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.26 Area 0.01 0.04 < 0.005 0.04 Energy < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 Water - - - - Waste - - - - Refrig. - - - - Total 0.05 0.07 0.04 0.30 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 0.01 0.40 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.30 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 0.01 0.30 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 2.6. Operations Emissions by Sector, Mitigated < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - 239 239 0.02 < 0.005 - 240 2.38 12.6 15.0 0.25 0.01 - 22.8 - - - - 3.51 0.00 3.51 0.35 0.00 - 12.3 - - - - - - - - - 0.02 0.02 0.41 0.01 0.10 0.11 5.89 691 696 0.64 0.03 0.07 721 0.30 < 0.005 0.08 0.08 - 333 333 0.02 0.01 0.60 338 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - 0.86 0.86 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 0.86 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - 239 239 0.02 < 0.005 - 240 - - - - 2.38 12.6 15.0 0.25 0.01 - 22.8 - - - - 3.51 0.00 3.51 0.35 0.00 - 12.3 - - - - - - - - - 0.02 0.02 0.31 0.01 0.08 0.08 5.89 585 591 0.63 0.02 0.62 614 0.06 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 - 55.1 55.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.10 56.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - 0.14 0.14 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 0.14 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - 39.5 39.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 39.7 - - - - 0.39 2.08 2.48 0.04 < 0.005 - 3.78 - - - - 0.58 0.00 0.58 0.06 0.00 - 2.03 - - - - - - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 0.98 96.8 97.8 0.10 < 0.005 0.10 102 Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) CO2e Ou 14/63 Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Daily, Summer (Max) Mobile 0.29 0.27 0.18 1.95 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.40 0.41 < 0.005 0.10 0.11 - 457 457 0.02 0.02 1.86 465 Area 0.05 0.22 < 0.005 0.30 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - 1.25 1.25 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 1.26 Energy 0.01 < 0.005 0.05 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - 239 239 0.02 < 0.005 - 240 Water - - - - - - - - - - - 2.38 12.6 15.0 0.25 0.01 - 22.8 Waste - - - - - - - - - - - 3.51 0.00 3.51 0.35 0.00 - 12.3 Refrig. - - - - - - - - - - - - 0.02 0.02 Total 0.35 0.49 0.23 2.30 < 0.005 0.01 0.40 0.41 0.01 0.10 0.11 5.89 709 715 0.64 0.03 1.87 741 Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Mobile 0.29 0.27 0.20 1.85 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.40 0.41 < 0.005 0.10 0.11 - 439 439 0.03 0.02 0.05 446 Area - 0.17 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Energy 0.01 < 0.005 0.05 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - 239 239 0.02 < 0.005 - 240 Water - - - - - - - - - - - 2.38 12.6 15.0 0.25 0.01 - 22.8 Waste - - - - - - - - - - - 3.51 0.00 3.51 0.35 0.00 - 12.3 Refrig. - - - - - - - - - - - - 0.02 0.02 Total 0.30 0.44 0.24 1.89 < 0.005 0.01 0.40 0.41 0.01 0.10 0.11 5.89 691 696 0.64 0.03 0.07 721 Average - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Mobile 0.22 0.20 0.15 1.41 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.30 0.30 < 0.005 0.08 0.08 - 333 333 0.02 0.01 0.60 338 Area 0.04 0.20 < 0.005 0.21 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - 0.86 0.86 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 0.86 Energy 0.01 < 0.005 0.05 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - 239 239 0.02 < 0.005 - 240 Water - - - - - - - - - - - 2.38 12.6 15.0 0.25 0.01 - 22.8 Waste - - - - - - - - - - - 3.51 0.00 3.51 0.35 0.00 - 12.3 Refrig. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0.02 0.02 Total 0.26 9.49-9.29 4.66 49.996 9.94 939 @.;4 9.94 9.98 9.989-89 686 694 9.6; 9.920.62 614 City Council 26 - 138 1/16/2024 15/63 Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Annual Mobile 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.26 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 0.06 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 - 55.1 55.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.10 56.0 Area 0.01 0.04 < 0.005 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - 0.14 0.14 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 0.14 Energy < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - 39.5 39.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 39.7 Water - - - - - - - - - - - 0.39 2.08 2.48 0.04 < 0.005 - 3.78 Waste - - - - - - - - - - - 0.58 0.00 0.58 0.06 0.00 - 2.03 Refrig. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 Total 0.05 0.07 0.04 0.30 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 0.06 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 0.98 96.8 97.8 0.10 < 0.005 0.10 102 3. Construction Emissions Details 3.1. Building Construction (2023) - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Onsite Daily, - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Off -Road 0.69 0.58 5.93 7.00 0.01 0.28 - 0.28 0.26 - 0.26 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Average Daily Off -Road 0.08 0.07 0.71 0.84 < 0.005 0.03 - 0.03 0.03 - 0.03 - Equipment iNBCO2 CO2T CH4 N20 R CO2e 1,305 1,305 0.05 0.01 - 1,309 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 156 156 0.01 < 0.005 - 156 City Council 26 - 139 1/16/2024 16/63 Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Off -Road 0.02 0.01 0.13 0.15 < 0.005 0.01 - 0.01 0.01 - 0.01 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - Summer (Max) Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 3.2. Building Construction (2023) - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/dav for daily. ton/vr for annual) and GHGs (lb/dav for dailv. MT/vr for annual) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 25.8 25.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 25.9 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 29.5 29.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 29.8 37.6 37.6 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 39.2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.57 3.57 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 3.62 4.49 4.49 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 4.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.59 0.59 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.60 0.74 0.74 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.78 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 17/63 CO2e Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Onsite - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, Summer (Max) Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Off -Road 0.69 0.58 5.93 7.00 0.01 0.28 - 0.28 0.26 - 0.26 - 1,305 1,305 0.05 0.01 - 1,309 Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck Average - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Off -Road 0.08 0.07 0.71 0.84 < 0.005 0.03 - 0.03 0.03 - 0.03 - 156 156 0.01 < 0.005 - 156 Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Off -Road 0.02 0.01 0.13 0.15 < 0.005 0.01 - 0.01 0.01 - 0.01 - 25.8 25.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 25.9 Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck Offsite - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 - 29.5 29.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 29.8 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 37.6 37.6 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 39.2 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 City Council 26 - 141 1/16/2024 18/63 Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Average Daily Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 3.3. Building Construction (2024) - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Onsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Off -Road 0.67 0.56 5.60 6.98 0.01 0.26 - 0.26 0.23 - 0.23 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Average - - - - - - - - - Daily Off -Road 0.08 0.07 0.66 0.82 < 0.005 0.03 - 0.03 0.03 - 0.03 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Annual - City Council - - - - -26 - 1-42 - - - 19/63 3.57 3.57 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 3.62 4.49 4.49 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 4.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.59 0.59 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.60 0.74 0.74 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.78 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 iNBCO2 CO2T CH4 N20 R CO2e 1,305 1,305 0.05 0.01 - 1,309 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 153 153 0.01 < 0.005 - 154 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 /1-&/2024 - - - - - Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Off -Road 0.01 0.01 0.12 0.15 < 0.005 0.01 - 0.01 0.01 - 0.01 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Daily, - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 3.4. Building Construction (2024) - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Onsite - - - - - - - - - - - - 25.4 25.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 25.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 28.9 28.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 29.2 37.2 37.2 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 38.8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.44 3.44 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 3.48 4.36 4.36 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 4.55 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.57 0.57 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.58 0.72 0.72 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 City Council 26 - 143 1/16/2024 20 / 63 Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Off -Road 0.67 0.56 5.60 6.98 0.01 0.26 - 0.26 0.23 - 0.23 - 1,305 1,305 0.05 0.01 - 1,309 Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck Average - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Off -Road 0.08 0.07 0.66 0.82 < 0.005 0.03 - 0.03 0.03 - 0.03 - 153 153 0.01 < 0.005 - 154 Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Off -Road 0.01 0.01 0.12 0.15 < 0.005 0.01 - 0.01 0.01 - 0.01 - 25.4 25.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 25.5 Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck Offsite - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 - 28.9 28.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 29.2 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 37.2 37.2 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 38.8 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily City Council 26 - 144 1/16/2024 21 / 63 Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 3.5. Paving (2024) - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Onsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Off -Road 0.63 0.53 4.52 5.32 0.01 0.21 - 0.21 0.19 - 0.19 - Equipment Paving - 0.00 - - - - - - - - - - Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Off -Road 0.63 0.53 4.52 5.32 0.01 0.21 - 0.21 0.19 - 0.19 - Equipment Paving - 0.00 - - - - - - - - - - Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Average - - - - - - - - - - Daily 3.44 3.44 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 3.48 4.36 4.36 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 4.55 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.57 0.57 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.58 0.72 0.72 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 823 823 0.03 0.01 - 826 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 823 823 0.03 0.01 - 826 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 City Council 26 - 145 1/16/2024 22/63 Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Off -Road 0.07 0.06 0.53 0.63 < 0.005 0.02 - 0.02 0.02 - 0.02 - Equipment Paving - 0.00 - - - - - - - - Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Off -Road 0.01 0.01 0.10 0.11 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - Equipment Paving - 0.00 - - - - - - - - - - Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Worker 0.07 0.06 0.07 1.05 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.05 0.05 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Worker 0.07 0.06 0.08 0.91 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.05 0.05 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker < 0.005 E;ft. D0SoUT0:0p5 0.02 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 205- 1®* < 0.005 < 0.005 - 23 / 63 97.0 97.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 97.3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 16.1 16.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 16.1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 237 237 < 0.005 0.01 0.97 241 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 226 226 < 0.005 0.01 0.03 228 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 27.0 27.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 27.3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 < 0.0051 /1602024 0.01 4.52 4.46 4.46 Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 3.6. Paving (2024) - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants(lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual and GHGs(lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual Onsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Off -Road 0.63 0.53 4.52 5.32 0.01 0.21 - 0.21 0.19 - 0.19 - Equipment Paving - 0.00 - - - - - - - - - - Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Off -Road 0.63 0.53 4.52 5.32 0.01 0.21 - 0.21 0.19 - 0.19 - Equipment Paving - 0.00 - - - - - - - - - - Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Off -Road 0.07 0.06 0.53 0.63 < 0.005 0.02 - 0.02 0.02 - 0.02 - Equipment Paving - 0.00 - - - - - - - - - - Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Hnnuai - - - - - - - - - - City Council 26 - 147 24/63 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 823 823 0.03 0.01 - 826 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 823 823 0.03 0.01 - 826 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 97.0 97.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 97.3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 /16/2024 Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Off -Road 0.01 0.01 0.10 0.11 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - Equipment Paving - 0.00 - - - - - - - - Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Worker 0.07 0.06 0.07 1.05 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.05 0.05 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Worker 0.07 0.06 0.08 0.91 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.05 0.05 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 3.7. Architectural Coating (2024) - Unmitigated Criteria Poll utant9k/99YOIdaily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/O foo Mily, MT/yr for annual) 25 / 63 16.1 16.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 16.1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 237 237 < 0.005 0.01 0.97 241 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 226 226 < 0.005 0.01 0.03 228 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 27.0 27.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 27.3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.46 4.46 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 4.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 /16/2024 Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Onsite Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Off -Road 0.17 0.14 0.91 1.15 < 0.005 0.03 - 0.03 0.03 - 0.03 - Equipment Architect - 0.75 - - - - - - - - - ural Coatings Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Off -Road 0.02 0.02 0.11 0.14 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - Equipment Architect - 0.09 - - - - - - - - - - ural Coatings Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Off -Road < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - Equipment Architect - 0.02 - - - - - - - - - - ural Coatings Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite - - - - - - - - - - - - 134 134 0.01 < 0.005 - 134 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 15.7 15.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 15.8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.60 2.60 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 2.61 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 City Council 26 - 149 1/16/2024 26 / 63 Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 3.8. Architectural Coating (2024) - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Onsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Off -Road 0.17 0.14 0.91 1.15 < 0.005 0.03 - 0.03 0.03 - 0.03 - Equipment Architect - 0.75 - - - - - - - - - - urA 6.07 6.07 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 6.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.69 0.69 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.11 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N20 R CO2e 0.00.005 134 Coatings City Council 26 - 150 27 / 63 1 /16/2024 Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck Daily, - - - - - Winter (Max) Average - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Off -Road 0.02 0.02 0.11 0.14 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - 15.7 15.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 15.8 Equipment Architect - 0.09 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ural Coatings Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck Annual - - - - - - - - - - Off -Road < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - 2.60 2.60 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 2.61 Equipment Architect - 0.02 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ural Coatings Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck Offsite - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 6.07 6.07 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 6.16 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Average - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily City Council 26 - 151 1/16/2024 28 / 63 Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 4. Operations Emissions Details 4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use 4.1.1. Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) General 0.29 0.27 0.18 1.95 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.40 0.41 < 0.005 0.10 0.11 - Office Building Total 0.29 0.27 0.18 1.95 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.40 0.41 < 0.005 0.10 0.11 - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) General 0.29 0.27 0.20 1.85 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.40 0.41 < 0.005 0.10 0.11 - Office Building Total 0.29 0.27 0.20 1.85 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.40 0.41 < 0.005 0.10 0.11 - Annual - City Council - - - - -26 - 1-52 - - 29 / 63 0.69 0.69 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.11 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CO2e 457 457 0.02 0.02 1.86 465 457 457 0.02 0.02 1.86 465 439 439 0.03 0.02 0.05 446 439 439 0.03 0.02 0.05 446 1 /1-r/2024 - - Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 General 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.26 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 0.06 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 - 55.1 55.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.10 56.0 Office Building Total 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.26 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 0.06 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 - 55.1 55.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.10 56.0 4.1.2. Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) General 0.29 0.27 0.18 1.95 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.40 0.41 < 0.005 0.10 0.11 - 457 457 0.02 0.02 1.86 465 Office Building Total 0.29 0.27 0.18 1.95 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.40 0.41 < 0.005 0.10 0.11 - 457 457 0.02 0.02 1.86 465 Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) General 0.29 0.27 0.20 1.85 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.40 0.41 < 0.005 0.10 0.11 - 439 439 0.03 0.02 0.05 446 Office Building Total 0.29 0.27 0.20 1.85 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.40 0.41 < 0.005 0.10 0.11 - 439 439 0.03 0.02 0.05 446 Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - General 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.26 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 0.06 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 - 55.1 55.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.10 56.0 Office Building Total 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.26 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 0.06 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 - 55.1 55.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.10 56.0 4.2. Energy 4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated City Council 26 - 153 1/16/2024 30/63 Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Summer (Max) General — — — — — — — — — — — — 182 182 0.01 < 0.005 — 182 Office Building Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 182 182 0.01 < 0.005 — 182 Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Winter (Max) General — — — — — — — — — — — — 182 182 0.01 < 0.005 — 182 Office Building Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 182 182 0.01 < 0.005 — 182 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — General — — — — — — — — — — — — 30.1 30.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 30.2 Office Building Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 30.1 30.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 30.2 4.2.2. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Summer (Max) General — — — — — — — — — — — — 182 182 0.01 < 0.005 — 182 Office Building City Council 26 — 154 1/16/2024 31 / 63 Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Total - - - - - - - - - - - - 182 182 0.01 < 0.005 - 182 Daily, - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) General - - - - - - - - - - - - 182 182 0.01 < 0.005 - 182 Office Building Total - - - - - - - - - - - - 182 182 0.01 < 0.005 - 182 Annual- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - General - - - - - - - - - - - - 30.1 30.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 30.2 Office Building Total - - - - - - - - - - - - 30.1 30.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 30.2 4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Daily, Summer (Max) General 0.01 < 0.005 0.05 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - 56.9 56.9 0.01 < 0.005 - 57.0 Office Building Total 0.01 < 0.005 0.05 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - 56.9 56.9 0.01 < 0.005 - 57.0 Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) General 0.01 < 0.005 0.05 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - 56.9 56.9 0.01 < 0.005 - 57.0 Office Building Total 0.01 < 0.005 0.05 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - 56.9 56.9 0.01 < 0.005 - 57.0 Annual - Gty Council - - - - -26 - 1-55 - - - - - - 1/1-6/2024 32/63 Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 General < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - 9.41 9.41 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 9.44 Office Building Total < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - 9.41 9.41 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 9.44 4.2.4. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land TOG ROG NOx CO S02 �PMIIOE �PM10D �PMIIOT �PM2.51E �PM2.51D �PM2.5`r �BCO2 �NBCO2 �CO2`r �CH4 �N20 R �CO2e Use Daily, Summer (Max) General 0.01 < 0.005 0.05 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - 56.9 56.9 0.01 < 0.005 - 57.0 Office Building Total 0.01 < 0.005 0.05 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - 56.9 56.9 0.01 < 0.005 - 57.0 Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) General 0.01 < 0.005 0.05 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - 56.9 56.9 0.01 < 0.005 - 57.0 Office Building Total 0.01 < 0.005 0.05 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - 56.9 56.9 0.01 < 0.005 - 57.0 Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - General < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - 9.41 9.41 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 9.44 Office Building Total < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - 9.41 9.41 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 9.44 4.3. Area Emissions by Source 4.3.2. Unmitigated City Council 26 - 156 1/16/2024 33/63 Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Summer (Max) Consum — 0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — er Products Architect — 0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — ural Coatings Landsca 0.05 0.05 < 0.005 0.30 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 1.25 1.25 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.26 pe Equipme nt Total 0.05 0.22 < 0.005 0.30 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 1.25 1.25 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.26 Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Winter (Max) Consum — 0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — er Products Architect — 0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — ural Coatings Total — 0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Consum — 0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — er Products Architect — < 0.005 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — ural Coatings City Council 26 — 157 1/16/2024 34/63 Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Landsca 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - 0.14 0.14 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 0.14 pe Equipme Total 0.01 0.04 < 0.005 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - 0.14 0.14 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 0.14 4.3.1. Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Consum - 0.15 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - er Products Architect - 0.02 - - - - - - - - - - - - - ural Coatings Landsca 0.05 0.05 < 0.005 0.30 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - 1.25 1.25 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 1.26 pe Equipme nt Total 0.05 0.22 < 0.005 0.30 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - 1.25 1.25 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 1.26 Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Consum - 0.15 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - er Products Architect - 0.02 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ural Coatings Total - 0.17 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - City Council 26 - 158 1/16/2024 35/63 Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Consum - 0.03 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - er Architect - < 0.005 - - - - - - - - - - ural Coatings Landsca 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - 0.14 0.14 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 0.14 pe Equipme nt Total 0.01 0.04 < 0.005 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - 0.14 0.14 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 0.14 4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use 4.4.2. Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) General - - - - - - - - - - - 2.38 12.6 15.0 0.25 0.01 - 22.8 Office Building Total - - - - - - - - - - - 2.38 12.6 15.0 0.25 0.01 - 22.8 Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) General - - - - - - - 2.38 12.6 15.0 0.25 0.01 - 22.8 Office Building Total - - - - - - - - - - - 2.38 12.6 15.0 0.25 0.01 - 22.8 Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - City Council 26 - 159 1/16/2024 36/63 Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 General - - - - - - - - - - - Office Building Total - - - - - - - - - - - 4.4.1. Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) 0.39 2.08 2.48 0.04 < 0.005 - 3.78 0.39 2.08 2.48 0.04 < 0.005 - 3.78 Land TOG ROG NOx CO S02 �PMIIOE �PM10D �PMIIOT �PM2.51E �PM2.51D �PM2.5`r �BCO2 �NBCO2 ICO2T �CH4 �N20 R �CO2e Use D. Summer 0.01 22.8 Office Building Total - - - - - - - - - - - 2.38 12.6 15.0 0.25 0.01 - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) General - - - - - - - - - - - 2.38 12.6 15.0 0.25 0.01 - Office Building Total - - - - - - - - - - - 2.38 12.6 15.0 0.25 0.01 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - General - - - - - - - - - - - 0.39 2.08 2.48 0.04 < 0.005 - Office Building Total - - - - - - - - - - - 0.39 2.08 2.48 0.04 < 0.005 - 4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use 4.5.2. Unmitigated City Council 26 - 160 1/16/2024 37/63 22.8 22.8 22.8 3.78 Mi.] Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) General - - - - - - - - - - - 3.51 0.00 3.51 0.35 0.00 - 12.3 Office Building Total - - - - - - - - - - - 3.51 0.00 3.51 0.35 0.00 - 12.3 Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) General - - - - - - - - - - - 3.51 0.00 3.51 0.35 0.00 - 12.3 Office Building Total - - - - - - - - - - - 3.51 0.00 3.51 0.35 0.00 - 12.3 Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - General - - - - - - - - - - - 0.58 0.00 0.58 0.06 0.00 - 2.03 Office Building Total - - - - - - - - - - - 0.58 0.00 0.58 0.06 0.00 - 2.03 4.5.1. Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) General - - - - - - - - - - - 3.51 0.00 3.51 0.35 0.00 - 12.3 Office Building City Council 26 - 161 1/16/2024 38 / 63 Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Total - - - - - - - - - - - 3.51 0.00 3.51 0.35 0.00 - 12.3 Daily, - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) General - - - - - - - - - - - 3.51 0.00 3.51 0.35 0.00 - 12.3 Office Building Total - - - - - - - - - - - 3.51 0.00 3.51 0.35 0.00 - 12.3 Annual General - - - - - - - - - - - 0.58 0.00 0.58 0.06 0.00 - 2.03 Office Building Total - - - - - - - - - - - 0.58 0.00 0.58 0.06 0.00 - 2.03 4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use 4.6.1. Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Daily, Summer (Max) General - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0.02 0.02 Office Building Total - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0.02 0.02 Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) General - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0.02 0.02 Office Building City Council 26 - 162 1/16/2024 39/63 Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.02 0.02 Annual — — — — General — — — — — < 0.005 < 0.005 Office Building Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — < 0.005 < 0.005 4.6.2. Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Summer (Max) General — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.02 0.02 Office Building Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.02 0.02 Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Winter (Max) General — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.02 0.02 Office Building Total 0.02 0.02 Annual — — — — — — — — General — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — < 0.005 < 0.005 Office Building Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — < 0.005 < 0.005 4.7. Offroad Ity oQQORRQuncll 26 — 163 1/16/2024 40 / 63 Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 4.7.1. Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) nt Equipme NEENNEENEEN - Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Summer (Max) Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Winter (Max) Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 4.7.2. Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Summer (Max) Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Winter (Max) Total — — — — — — — — — — Annual— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — City Council 26 — 164 1/16/2024 41 / 63 Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type 4.8.1. Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Summer (Max) Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Winter (Max) Total — — — — — — — — — — — Annual— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 4.8.2. Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipme nt Type Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Summer (Max) Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Winter (Max) Total — — City Council 26 — 165 1/16/2024 42/63 Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type 4.9.1. Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) nt Equipme - Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Summer (Max) Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Winter (Max) Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Annual— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 4.9.2. Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Summer (Max) Total— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — City Council 26 — 166 1/16/2024 43 / 63 Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Winter (Max) Total — — — — — — Annual— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type 4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Summer (Max) Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Winter (Max) Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Total— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/dav for dailv. ton/vr for annual) and GHGs (lb/dav for dailv. MT/vr for annual) Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Summer (Max) City Council 26 — 167 1/16/2024 44/63 Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Total — — — — — — — — — — — — Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — Winter (Max) Total — — — — — — — — — — — — Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — Summer (Max) Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — Sequest — — — — — — — — — — — — ered Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — Remove — — — — — — — — — — — — d Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — Daily, — — — — — — — Winter (Max) Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — Sequest — — — — — — — — — — — — ered Subtotal — City Council _ _ _ _ _26 — 168 _ _ 45/63 1 /16/2024 _ Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Remove — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Subtotal — — — — — — Annual — Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Sequest — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — ered Subtotal — — — — Remove — — — — — — — — — d Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 4.10.4. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Summer (Max) Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Winter (Max) Total — — — — — — — — — — — Annual— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — City Council 26 — 169 1/16/2024 46 / 63 Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 4.10.5. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Summer (Max) Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Winter (Max) Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Annual— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 4.10.6. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Summer (Max) Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Sequest — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — ered Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Remove — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — d Subtotal — — — — — — — — — - - CRY Council — — — — —26 — 170 — — — — — — 1/1-6/2024 — — 47 / 63 Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Daily, Winter (Max) Avoided Subtotal Sequest ered Subtotal Remove d Subtotal Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Sequest — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — ered Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Remove — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — d Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 5. Activity Data 5.1. Construction Schedule Building Construction Building Construction 11/1/2023 2/29/2024 5.00 87.0 — Paving City oun�il Z 71 1/16/2024 48/63 Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 5.2. Off -Road Equipment 5.2.1. Unmitigated Building Construction Cranes Diesel Building Construction Forklifts Diesel Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backh Diesel oes Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backh Diesel oes Paving Cement and Mortar Diesel Mixers Paving Pavers Diesel Paving Rollers Diesel Architectural Coating Air Compressors Diesel 5.2.2. Mitigated 5/1 /2024 6/30/2024 5.00 43.0 - Average 1.00 4.00 367 0.29 Average 2.00 6.00 82.0 0.20 Average 2.00 8.00 84.0 0.37 Average 1.00 7.00 84.0 0.37 Average 4.00 6.00 10.0 0.56 Average 1.00 7.00 81.0 0.42 Average 1.00 7.00 36.0 0.38 Average 1.00 6.00 37.0 0.48 Building Construction Cranes Diesel Average 1.00 4.00 367 0.29 Building Construction Forklifts Diesel Average 2.00 6.00 82.0 0.20 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backh Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 84.0 0.37 oes Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backh Diesel Average 1.00 7.00 84.0 0.37 oes Paving Cement and Mortar Diesel Average 4.00 6.00 10.0 0.56 Mixers Paving FaAers City Council Diesel Average 26 - 172uu 1/16/20 49/63 Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Paving Rollers Diesel Average 1.00 7.00 36.0 0.38 Architectural Coating Air Compressors Diesel Average 1.00 6.00 37.0 0.48 5.3. Construction Vehicles 5.3.1. Unmitigated Building Construction Building Construction Worker 2.24 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 Building Construction Vendor 1.15 10.2 HHDTMHDT Building Construction Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT Building Construction Onsite truck — — HHDT Paving — — — — Paving Worker 17.5 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 Paving Vendor — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT Paving Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT Paving Onsite truck — — HHDT Architectural Coating — — — — Architectural Coating Worker 0.45 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 Architectural Coating Vendor — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT Architectural Coating Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT Architectural Coating Onsite truck — — HHDT 5.3.2. Mitigated Building Construction — Building ConstructionCity Council Worker 2.24 26 — 173 18.5 LDAPT64924 50/63 Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Building Construction Vendor 1.15 10.2 HHDT,MHDT Building Construction Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT Building Construction Onsite truck — — HHDT Paving — — — — Paving Worker 17.5 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 Paving Vendor — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT Paving Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT Paving Onsite truck — — HHDT Architectural Coating — — — — Architectural Coating Worker 0.45 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 Architectural Coating Vendor — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT Architectural Coating Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT Architectural Coating Onsite truck — — HHDT 5.4. Vehicles 5.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control Strategies Non -applicable. No control strategies activated by user. 5.5. Architectural Coatings Architectural Coating 0.00 0.00 10,500 3,500 — 5.6. Dust Mitigation 5.6.1. Construction Earthmoving Activities Phase Name iviaieriai irnpvried kcy) iviaieriai r_xporiU ' " • i�cres uraded kacresj iviaieriai uemoiisned ksy. i • , Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Paving 0.00 0.00 5.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control Strategies Water Exposed Area 3 5.7. Construction Paving General Office Building 0.00 5.8. Construction Electricity Consumption and Emissions Factors kWh per Year and Emission Factor (lb/MWh) kWh per Year • 2023 0.00 532 2024 0.00 532 5.9. Operational Mobile Sources 5.9.1. Unmitigated General Office 84.0 Building 5.9.2. Mitigated 15.5 4.90 22,962 0.00 74% 570 0.03 0.03 WE 0% 105 74% wl < 0.005 < 0.005 33.3 155,892 City Council 26 — 175 1/16/2024 52/63 Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 General Office 84.0 15.5 4.90 22,962 570 Building 5.10. Operational Area Sources 5.10.1. Hearths 5.10.1.1. Unmitigated 5.10.1.2. Mitigated 5.10.2. Architectural Coatings C no 10,500 3,500 105 5.10.3. Landscape Equipment Snow Days day/yr 0.00 Summer Days day/yr 250 5.10.4. Landscape Equipment - Mitigated Snow Days Summer Days 5.11. Operational Energy Consumption City Council day/yr 0.00 day/yr 250 26 — 176 53/63 33.3 155,892 1 /16/2024 Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 5.11.1. Unmitigated Electricity (kWh/yr) and CO2 and CH4 and N20 and Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) .all, • General Office Building 124,742 532 0.0330 5.11.2. Mitigated Electricity (kWh/yr) and CO2 and CH4 and N20 and Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Electricity (kWh/yr)• M General Office Building 124,742 532 0.0330 5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption 5.12.1. Unmitigated General Office Building 5.12.2. Mitigated General Office Building 5.13. Operational Waste Generation 5.13.1. Unmitigated 1,244,136 1,244,136 Land Use -M M- General Office Building 6.51 City Council 26 — 177 54/63 0.0040 0.0040 29,770 29,770 177,425 177,425 1 /16/2024 Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 5.13.2. Mitigated General Office Building 6.51 5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment 5.14.1. Unmitigated General Office Building Household refrigerators R-134a and/or freezers General Office Building Other commercial A/C R-410A and heat pumps 5.14.2. Mitigated General Office Building Household refrigerators R-134a and/or freezers General Office Building Other commercial A/C R-410A and heat pumps 5.15. Operational Off -Road Equipment 5.15.1. Unmitigated 5.15.2. Mitigated 1,430 0.02 0.60 0.00 1.00 2,088 < 0.005 4.00 4.00 18.0 1,430 0.02 0.60 0.00 1.00 2,088 < 0.005 4.00 4.00 18.0 55/63 1/1 Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 5.16. Stationary Sources 5.16.1. Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps Equipment Type Fuel Type Number per Day Hours per Day Hours per Year Horsepower Load Factor 5.16.2. Process Boilers 5.17. User Defined 5.18. Vegetation 5.18.1. Land Use Change 5.18.1.1. Unmitigated 5.18.1.2. Mitigated 5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type 5.18.1.1. Unmitigated Biomass Cover Type Initial Acre - I E I Final Acres 56/63 Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 5.18.1.2. Mitigated 5.18.2. Sequestration 5.18.2.1. Unmitigated 5.18.2.2. Mitigated 6. Climate Risk Detailed Report 6.1. Climate Risk Summary Cal -Adapt midcentury 2040-2059 average projections for four hazards are reported below for your project location. These are under Representation Concentration Pathway (RCP) 8.5 which assumes GHG emissions will continue to rise stronqlv throuqh 2050 and then plateau around 2100. Temperature and Extreme Heat 9.03 annual days of extreme heat Extreme Precipitation 3.50 annual days with precipitation above 20 mm Sea Level Rise 0.00 meters of inundation depth Wildfire 1.31 annual hectares burned Temperature and Extreme Heat data are for grid cell in which your project are located. The projection is based on the 98th historical percentile of daily maximum/minimum temperatures from observed historical data (32 climate model ensemble from Cal -Adapt, 2040-2059 average under RCP 8.5). Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi. Extreme Precipitation data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The threshold of 20 mm is equivalent to about 3/4 an inch of rain, which would be light to moderate rainfall if received over a full day or heavy rain if received over a period of 2 to 4 hours. Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi. Sea Level Rise data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The projections are from Radke et al. (2017), as reported in Cal -Adapt (2040-2059 average under RCP 8.5), and consider different increments of sea level rise coupled with extreme storm events. Users may select from four model simulations to view the range in potential inundation depth for the grid cell. The four simulations make different assumptions - - and temperature possibilities (MIR005F#t&hg%R9iiL 50 meters (m) by 50 m, or about 164 feet (ft) by 1t �t.— 180 1/16/2024 57/63 Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Wildfire data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The projections are from UC Davis, as reported in Cal -Adapt (2040-2059 average under RCP 8.5), and consider historical data of climate, vegetation, population density, and large (> 400 ha) fire history. Users may select from four model simulations to view the range in potential wildfire probabilities for the grid cell. The four simulations make different assumptions about expected rainfall and temperature are: Warmer/drier (HadGEM2-ES), Cooler/wetter (CNRM-CM5), Average conditions (CanESM2), Range of different rainfall and temperature possibilities (MIR005). Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi. 6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores Climate Hazard Exposure Score Sensitivity Score Adaptive Capacity Score Vulnerability Score Temperature and Extreme Heat 1 0 0 N/A Extreme Precipitation N/A N/A N/A N/A Sea Level Rise 1 0 0 N/A Wildfire 1 0 0 N/A Flooding N/A N/A N/A N/A Drought N/A N/A N/A N/A Snowpack Reduction N/A N/A N/A N/A Air Quality Degradation 0 0 0 N/A The sensitivity score reflects the extent to which a project would be adversely affected by exposure to a climate hazard. Exposure is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest exposure. The adaptive capacity of a project refers to its ability to manage and reduce vulnerabilities from projected climate hazards. Adaptive capacity is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest ability to adapt. The overall vulnerability scores are calculated based on the potential impacts and adaptive capacity assessments for each hazard. Scores do not include implementation of climate risk reduction measures. 6.3. Adjusted Climate Risk Scores Temperature and Extreme Heat 1 1 1 2 Extreme Precipitation N/A N/A N/A N/A Sea Level Rise 1 1 1 2 Wildfire 1 1 1 2 Flooding N/A N/A N/A N/A Drought N/A N/A N/A N/A Snowpack Reduction N/A N/A N/A N/A City Council 26 — 181 1/16/2024 58/63 Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Air Quality Degradation 1 1 1 2 The sensitivity score reflects the extent to which a project would be adversely affected by exposure to a climate hazard. Exposure is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest exposure. The adaptive capacity of a project refers to its ability to manage and reduce vulnerabilities from projected climate hazards. Adaptive capacity is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest ability to adapt. The overall vulnerability scores are calculated based on the potential impacts and adaptive capacity assessments for each hazard. Scores include implementation of climate risk reduction measures. 6.4. Climate Risk Reduction Measures 7. Health and Equity Details 7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores The maximum CalEnviroScreen score is 100. A hiah score (i Exposure Indicators AQ-Ozone AQ-PM AQ-DPM Drinking Water Lead Risk Housing Pesticides Toxic Releases Traffic Effect Indicators than 50) reflects a hiaher pollution burden compared to other census tracts in the state. 57.0 73.5 78.3 46.5 77.7 0.00 87.5 44.2 CleanUp Sites 94.8 Groundwater 0.00 Haz Waste Facilities/Generators 86.4 Impaired Water Bodies 0.00 Solid Waste FR 7 City Council 26 — 182 1/16/2024 59/63 Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Sensitive Population Asthma 55.5 Cardio-vascular 45.8 Low Birth Weights 88.0 Socioeconomic Factor Indicators — Education 97.9 Housing 88.7 Linguistic 96.9 Poverty 92.8 Unemployment 49.9 7.2. Healthy Places Index Scores The maximum Health Places Index score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects healthier community conditions compared to other census tracts in the state. Economic Above Poverty 5.41511613 Employed 49.83959964 Median HI 5.838573078 Education — Bachelor's or higher 10.61208777 High school enrollment 100 Preschool enrollment 45.81034262 Transportation — Auto Access 2.669061979 Active commuting 93.17336071 Social — 2-parent households City Council 26 — 183 1/16/2024 60/63 Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Voting 4.401385859 Neighborhood — Alcohol availability 16.27101245 Park access 35.81419222 Retail density 96.35570384 Supermarket access 94.25125112 Tree canopy 20.51841396 Housing — Homeownership 5.800076992 Housing habitability 4.516874118 Low-inc homeowner severe housing cost burden 15.57808289 Low-inc renter severe housing cost burden 43.07712049 Uncrowded housing 1.680995765 Health Outcomes — Insured adults 1.860644168 Arthritis 54.3 Asthma ER Admissions 49.4 High Blood Pressure 58.0 Cancer (excluding skin) 87.6 Asthma 14.8 Coronary Heart Disease 23.5 Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease 17.9 Diagnosed Diabetes 11.9 Life Expectancy at Birth 95.7 Cognitively Disabled 39.7 Physically Disabled 45.1 Heart Attack ER Admiccinnc 785 City Council 26 — 184 1/16/2024 61 / 63 Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Mental Health Not Good 7.3 Chronic Kidney Disease 14.8 Obesity 19.9 Pedestrian Injuries 94.3 Physical Health Not Good 7.3 Stroke 17.3 Health Risk Behaviors — Binge Drinking 57.0 Current Smoker 9.3 No Leisure Time for Physical Activity 3.2 Climate Change Exposures — Wildfire Risk 0.0 SLR Inundation Area 0.0 Children 0.5 Elderly 69.3 English Speaking 1.3 Foreign -born 93.3 Outdoor Workers 21.6 Climate Change Adaptive Capacity — Impervious Surface Cover 11.1 Traffic Density 55.3 Traffic Access 23.0 Other Indices — Hardship 96.6 Other Decision Support — 2016 Voting 31.1 City Council 26 — 185 1/16/2024 62/63 Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 7.3. Overall Health & Equity Scores CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Score for Project Location (a) 90.0 Healthy Places Index Score for Project Location (b) 12.0 Project Located in a Designated Disadvantaged Community (Senate Bill 535) Yes Project Located in a Low -Income Community (Assembly Bill 1550) Yes Project Located in a Community Air Protection Program Community (Assembly Bill 617) No a: The maximum CalEnviroScreen score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects a higher pollution burden compared to other census tracts in the state. b: The maximum Health Places Index score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects healthier community conditions compared to other census tracts in the state. 7.4. Health & Equity Measures No Health & Equity Measures selected. 7.5. Evaluation Scorecard Health & Equity Evaluation Scorecard not completed. 7.6. Health & Equity Custom Measures No Health & Equity Custom Measures created. 8. User Changes to Default Data Construction: Construction Phases Construction: Architectural Coatings Operations: Vehicle Data As per the information provided. As per SCAQMD Rule 1113. As per VISTA HERITAGE GLOBAL ACADEMY EXPANSION TRIP GENERATION ASSESSMENT City Council 26 — 186 63/63 1 /16/2024 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 ATTACHMENT B NOISE DATA City Council 26 — 187 1/16/2024 Site Number: NM-1 Recorded By: Winnie Woo, Darshan Shivaiah Job Number: Santa Ana Vista Charter School Date: 06/28/2023 Time: 11:08 AM Location: Northeast of Romero -Cruz Academy main building, southeast of the field Source of Ambient Noise: Traffic along Fairview Street Noise Data Leq (dB) LmaX(dB) Lmin (dB) 72.4 87.7 49.9 Category Type Vendor E ui ment Model Serial No. Cert. Date Note Sound Level Meter Bruel & Kjmr 2250 3011133 06/04/2023 Microphone Bruel & Kjaer 4189 3086765 06/04/2023 Sound Pream Bruel & K'aer ZC 0032 25380 06/04/2023 Calibrator Bruel & K mr 4231 2545667 06/04/2023 Weather Data Duration: 10 minutes Sky: artly Cloud Note: dBA Offset = 0.01 Sensor Height ft : 5 ft Est. Wind Ave Speed (mph / m/s Temperature (degrees Fahrenheit Barometer Pressure inches 6 mph 69 29.91 Photo of Measurement Location City Council 26 — 188 1/16/2024 2250 Instrument: 2250 Application: BZ7225 Version 4.7.6 Start Time: 06/28/2023 11:08:36 End Time: 06/28/2023 11:18:36 Elapsed Time: 00:10:00 Bandwidth: 1/3-octave Max Input Level: 142.15 Time Frequency Broadband excl. Peak): FSI AC Broadband Peak: C Spectrum: FS Z Instrument Serial Number: 3011133 Microphone Serial Number: 3086765 Input: Top Socket Windscreen Correction: UA-1650 Sound Field Correction: Free -field Calibration Time: 06/28/2023 08:19:46 Calibration Type: External reference Sensitivity: 43.4715375304222 mV/Pa VCS_001 Start time End time Elapsed time Overload % LAeq dB LAFinax dB LAFmin dB Value 0.00 72.4 87.7 49.9 Time 11:08:36 AM 11:18:36 AM 0:10:00 Date 06/28/2023 06/28/2023 City Council 26 — 189 1/16/2024 VCS_001 % Based on LAF , 10ms Class width: 0.2 dB 06/28/2023 11:08:36 AM - 11:18:36 AM 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Level Cumulative Cursor: [78.2 ; 78.4[dB Level: 0.3% Cumulative: 4.5% L1 = 81.9 dB L5 = 78.0 dB L10 = 75.9 dB L50 = 69.1 dB L90 = 56.1 dB L95 = 54.3 dB L99 = 52.1 dB dB City Council 26 — 190 1/16/2024 VCS_001 dB 140 120 100 80 60 40 — — — — — — 20 11:09:00 AM 11:11:00 AM 11:13:00 AM 11:15:00 AM 11:17:00 AM LAleq LAFinax LCpeak LAFmin Cursor: 06/28/2023 11:13:35 AM - 11:13:36 AM LAleq=61.7 dB LAFinax=61.7 dB LCpeak=82.4 dB LAFmin=60.5 dB VCS_001 Start time Elapsed time Overload % LAleq dB LAFinax dB LAFmin dB Value 0.00 61.7 61.7 60.5 Time 11:13:35 AM 0:00:01 Date 06/28/2023 City Council 26 — 191 1/16/2024 dB 06/28/2023 11:13:35 AM - 11:13:36 AM 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 12.50 31.50 63 _ LZeq Cursor: (A) Leq=61.1 dB VGS_001 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 16000 A C Hz VCS_001 Periodic reports dB 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 11:10:00 AM 11:20:00 AM 11:30:00 AM 11:40:00 AM 11:50:00 AM 12:00:00 PM LAleq LAFinax LCpeak LAFmin Cursor: 06/28/2023 11:08:36 AM - 12:08:36 PM LAleq=74.1 dB LAFinax=87.7 dB LCpeak=107.6 dB LAFmin=49.9 dB City Council 26 — 192 1/16/2024 VCS_001 Periodic reports Start time Elapsed time Overload % LAleq dB LAFinax dB LAFmin dB Value 0.00 74.1 87.7 49.9 Time 11:08:36 AM 0:10:00 Date 06/28/2023 City Council 26 — 193 1/16/2024 V c E VCS_001 Periodic reports �RSPd nn I AF 1 nms Class width. n 9 riR na/9R/9n93 11 •nR•3R AM _ 11.1 R•3R AM I L1 = 81.9 dB L5 = 78.0 dB L10 = 75.9 dB L50 = 69.1 dB L95 = 54.3 dB L99 = 52.1 dB 1 4- I 1 4- 1 4- L- J 1 t-- I -L 1 L-1 1 L I I I 9n in 4n fin Rn 7n An an inn iin 19n 1sn 1 Level Cumulative Cursor: [78.2 ; 78.4[dB Level: 0.3% Cumulative: 4.5% dB City Council 26 — 194 1/16/2024 Site Number: NM-2 Recorded By: Winnie Woo, Darshan Shivaiah Job Number: Santa Ana Vista Charter School Date: 06/28/2023 Time: 11:26 AM Location: East of southern driveway access to Vista Heritage Global Academy Source of Ambient Noise: Traffic along 5th Street and Fairview Street Noise Data Leq (dB) Lmax(dB) Lmin (dB) 66.2 80.7 46.5 Equipment Category Type Vendor Model Serial No. Cert. Date Note Sound Level Meter Bruel & K'aar 2250 3011133 06/04/2023 Microphone Bruel & K mr 4189 3086765 06/04/2023 Sound Preamp Bruel & K'aer ZC 0032 25380 06/04/2023 Calibrator Bruel & K'aer 4231 2545667 06/04/2023 Weather Data Duration: 10 minutes Sky: Partly Cloud Note: dBA Offset = 0.01 Sensor Height (ft): 5 ft Est. Wind Ave Speed mph / m/s Temperature (degrees Fahrenheit Barometer Pressure inches 6 mph 69 29.91 Photo of Measurement Location City Council 26 — 195 1/16/2024 2250 Instrument: 2250 Application: BZ7225 Version 4.7.6 Start Time: 06/28/2023 11:26:27 End Time: 06/28/2023 11:36:27 Elapsed Time: 00:10:00 Bandwidth: 1/3-octave Max Input Level: 142.15 Time Frequency Broadband excl. Peak): FSI AC Broadband Peak: C Spectrum: FS Z Instrument Serial Number: 3011133 Microphone Serial Number: 3086765 Input: Top Socket Windscreen Correction: UA-1650 Sound Field Correction: Free -field Calibration Time: 06/28/2023 08:19:46 Calibration Type: External reference Sensitivity: 43.4715375304222 mV/Pa VCS_002 Start time End time Elapsed time Overload % LAeq dB LAFinax dB LAFmin dB Value 0.00 66.2 80.7 46.5 Time 11:26:27 AM 11:36:27 AM 0:10:00 Date 06/28/2023 06/28/2023 City Council 26 — 196 1/16/2024 vcs_002 % Based on LAF , 10ms Class width: 0.2 dB 06/28/2023 11:26:27 AM - 11:36:27 AM 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 +I I L-J I LL I -L I L L L L L L I L I L Level Cumulative Cursor: [78.2 ; 78.4[dB Level: 0.0% Cumulative: 0.2% L1 = 76.2 dB L5 = 72.6 dB L10 = 70.4 dB L50 = 61.3 dB L90 = 53.4 dB L95 = 51.1 dB L99 = 48.2 dB dB City Council 26 — 197 1/16/2024 VCS_002 dB 140 120 100 r r 80 60 � r 40 — — L — — — — — — 20 11:27:00 AM 11:29:00 AM 11:31:00 AM 11:33:00 AM 11:35:00 AM LAIeq LAFinax LCpeak LAFmin Cursor: 06/28/2023 11:31:26 AM - 11:31:27 AM LAleq=73.0 dB LAFinax=67.5 dB LCpeak=81.9 dB LAFmin=60.4 dB VCS_002 Start time Elapsed time Overload % LAleq dB LAFinax dB LAFmin dB Value 0.00 73.0 67.5 60.4 Time 11:31:26 AM 0:00:01 Date 06/28/2023 City Council 26 — 198 1/16/2024 dB 06/28/2023 11:31:26 AM - 11:31:27 AM 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 12.50 31.50 63 _ LZeq Cursor: (A) Leq=62.9 dB Vcs_002 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 16000 A C Hz VCS_002 Periodic reports dB 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 11:30:00 AM 11:40:00 AM 11:50:00 AM 12:00:00 PM 12:10:00 PM 12:20:00 PM LAIeq LAFinax LCpeak LAFmin Cursor: 06/28/2023 11:26:27 AM - 12:26:27 PM LAIeq=68.6 dB LAFinax=80.7 dB LCpeak=100.6 dB LAFmin=46.5 dB City Council 26 — 199 1/16/2024 VCS_002 Periodic reports Start time Elapsed time Overload % LAleq dB LAFinax dB LAFmin dB Value 0.00 68.6 80.7 46.5 Time 11:26:27 AM 0:10:00 Date 06/28/2023 City Council 26 — 200 1/16/2024 V c E VCS_002 Periodic reports �RSPd nn I AF 1 nms Class width. n 9 riR na/9R/9n93 11.9R•97 AM _ 11.3R•97 AM 1 4- 1 1 4II I L-J I t-- I -L I I --Ii i i i i 9n in 4n fin Fn 7n An an inn iin 19n 1sn 1 Level Cumulative Cursor: [78.2 ; 78.4[dB Level: 0.0% Cumulative: 0.2% L1 = 76.2 dB L5 = 72.6 dB L10 = 70.4 dB L50 = 61.3 dB L90 = 53.4 dB L95 = 51.1 dB L99 = 48.2 dB dB City Council 26 — 201 1/16/2024 Site Number: NM-3 Recorded By: Winnie Woo, Darshan Shivaiah Job Number: Santa Ana Vista Charter School Date: 06/28/2023 Time: 11:45 AM Location: Cul-de-sac of West 7th Street Source of Ambient Noise: Traffic along Fairview Street Noise Data Leq (dB) Lmax(dB) Lmin (0) 51.1 79.6 41.1 Equipment Category Type Vendor Model Serial No. Cert. Date Note Sound Level Meter Bruel & K'aer 2250 3011133 06/04/2023 Microphone Bruel & K'aer 4189 3086765 06/04/2023 Sound Preamp Bruel & K'aer ZC 0032 25380 06/04/2023 Calibrator Bruel & K'aer 4231 2545667 06/04/2023 Weather Data Duration: 10 minutes Sky: Partly Cloud Note: dBA Offset = 0.01 Sensor Height (ft): 5 ft Est. Wind Ave Speed mph / m/s Temperature (degrees Fahrenheit Barometer Pressure inches 6 mph 69 29.91 Photo of Measurement Location City Council 26 — 202 1/16/2024 2250 Instrument: 2250 Application: BZ7225 Version 4.7.6 Start Time: 06/28/2023 11:45:06 End Time: 06/28/2023 11:55:06 Elapsed Time: 00:10:00 Bandwidth: 1/3-octave Max Input Level: 142.15 Time Frequency Broadband excl. Peak): FSI AC Broadband Peak: C Spectrum: FS Z Instrument Serial Number: 3011133 Microphone Serial Number: 3086765 Input: Top Socket Windscreen Correction: UA-1650 Sound Field Correction: Free -field Calibration Time: 06/28/2023 08:19:46 Calibration Type: External reference Sensitivity: 43.4715375304222 mV/Pa VCS_003 Start time End time Elapsed time Overload % LAeq dB LAFinax dB LAFmin dB Value 0.00 51.1 79.6 41.1 Time 11:45:06 AM 11:55:06 AM 0:10:00 Date 06/28/2023 06/28/2023 City Council 26 — 203 1/16/2024 VCS_003 % Based on LAF , 10ms Class width: 0.2 dB 06/28/2023 11:45:06 AM - 11:55:06 AM 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 1 L 1 �I 1 4I I� �I LILLILIIL Level Cumulative Cursor: [78.2 ; 78.4[dB Level: 0.0% Cumulative: 0.0% L1 = 59.2 dB L5 = 53.7 dB L10 = 51.2 dB L50 = 45.6 dB L90 = 43.2 dB L95 = 42.7 dB L99 = 41.9 dB dB City Council 26 — 204 1/16/2024 VCS_003 dB 140 120 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 100 80 60 40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 20 11:46:00 AM 11:48:00 AM 11:50:00 AM 11:52:00 AM 11:54:00 AM LAleq LAFinax LCpeak LAFmin Cursor: 06/28/2023 11:50:05 AM - 11:50:06 AM LAleq=48.2 dB LAFinax=48.3 dB LCpeak=68.4 dB LAFmin=47.6 dB VCS_003 Start time Elapsed time Overload % LAleq dB LAFinax dB LAFmin dB Value 0.00 48.2 48.3 47.6 Time 11:50:05 AM 0:00:01 Date 06/28/2023 City Council 26 — 205 1/16/2024 dB 06/28/2023 11:50:05 AM - 11:50:06 AM 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 12.50 31.50 _ LZeq Cursor: (A) Leq=47.9 dB VGS_003 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 16000 A C Hz VCS_003 Periodic reports dB 140 120 100 + 80 60 40 20 11:50:00 AM 12:00:00 PM 12:10:00 PM 12:20:00 PM 12:30:00 PM 12:40:00 PM LAIeq LAFinax LCpeak LAFmin Cursor: 06/28/2023 11:45:06 AM - 12:45:06 PM LAIeq=58.6 dB LAFinax=79.6 dB LCpeak=90.1 dB LAFmin=41.1 dB City Council 26 — 206 1/16/2024 VCS_003 Periodic reports Start time Elapsed time Overload % LAleq dB LAFinax dB LAFmin dB Value 0.00 58.6 79.6 41.1 Time 11:45:06 AM 0:10:00 Date 06/28/2023 City Council 26 — 207 1/16/2024 V c E VCS_003 Periodic reports �RSPd nn I AF 1 nms Class width. n 9 riR nR/9A19n93 11.AS-nR AM _ 11.5.ri•nr, AM fi l + + 1 4- 1-� 1 1 4- 1 � 4- I 9n in 4n fin Fn 7n An an inn iin 19n 1sn 1 Level Cumulative Cursor: [78.2 ; 78.4[dB Level: 0.0% Cumulative: 0.0% L1 = 59.2 dB L5 = 53.7 dB L10 = 51.2 dB L50 = 45.6 dB L90 = 43.2 dB L95 = 42.7 dB L99 = 41.9 dB dB City Council 26 — 208 1/16/2024 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 ATTACHMENT C TRIP GENERATION MEMO City Council 26 — 209 1/16/2024 URBAN I CROSSROADS DATE: July 24, 2023 TO: Ingrid Canedo, Red Hook Capital Partners FROM: Jose Alire/Robert Vu, Urban Crossroads, Inc. JOB NO: 14724D-02 TG Memo VISTA HERITAGE GLOBAL ACADEMY EXPANSION TRIP GENERATION ASSESSMENT Urban Crossroads, Inc. is pleased to provide the following Trip Generation Assessment for the Vista Heritage Global Academy Expansion development (Project), which is located at 601 North Fairview Street in the City of Santa Ana. The purpose of this assessment is to describe the proposed Project trip generation and provide a comparison to the existing building zoned as Light Manufacturing (M1). EXHIBIT A: PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN Council 26 — 210 1/16/2024 Ingrid Canedo, Red Hook Capital Partners July 24, 2023 Page 2 of 3 PROPOSED PROJECT The Project site currently contains an existing 5,837 square -foot industrial building that will be converted into an administrative office building. A 12,186 SF building was demolished and redeveloped into parking spaces as part of the expansion. In addition, the applicant is proposing to improve the site with 17,497 square feet of student outdoor spaces, on -site parking, and landscaping. Vista Heritage Global Academy is not increasing the maximum number of students with this expansion. TRIP GENERATION Trip generation represents the amount of traffic which is both attracted to and produced by a development. Determining traffic generation for a specific project is therefore based upon forecasting the amount of traffic that is expected to be both attracted to and produced by the specific land uses being proposed for a given development. In order to develop the traffic characteristics of the existing land use and the proposed Project, trip -generation statistics published in the ITE Trip Generation Manual (11 th Edition) were used. EXISTING USE As noted previously, the site is designated as Light Manufacturing (M1) and is currently developed with a 5,837 square foot industrial building on -site. The trip generation for the existing use is summarized in Table 1. As shown in Table 1, the existing industrial building generates a total of 28 two-way trips per day with 4 AM peak hour trips and 4 PM peak hour trips. Land Use Manufacturing Land Use Manufacturing TABLE 1: EXISTING USE TRIP GENERATION ITE z AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Units Daily LU Code In Out Total In Out Total 140 TSF 0.52 0.16 0.68 0.23 0.51 0.74 4.75 AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Daily Quantity UnitS2 In Out Total In Out Total 5.837 TSF 3 1 4 1 3 4 28 Trip Generation Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Trip Generation Manual, Eleventh Edition. Z TSF = thousand square feet PROPOSED PROJECT The proposed Project includes the redevelopment of the existing building into a 5,764 school district office building. The trip generation summary illustrating daily, and peak hour trip generation estimates for the proposed Project are also summarized in Table 2. The proposed Project is anticipated to generate 84 two-way trips per day with 14 AM peak hour trips and 12 PM peak hour trips. V ur�r—�OSSROADS 26 — 211 141kA1Aq?4Aerno Ingrid Canedo, Red Hook Capital Partners July 24, 2023 Page 3 of 3 TABLE 2: PROPOSED PROJECT TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY ITE Z AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Units Daily Land Use LU Code In Out Total In Out Total School District Office 528 TSF 1.18 1.18 2.36 1.02 1.02 2.04 14.37 AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Daily Land Use Quantity UnitS2 In Out Total In Out Total School District Office 5.837 TSF 7 7 14 6 6 12 84 Trip Generation Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Trip Generation Manual, Eleventh Edition. Z TSF = thousand square feet TRIP GENERATION COMPARISON Table 3 compares the trip generation of the proposed Project to the existing use (currently adopted). The resulting net change in trips is also identified in Table 3 and has been calculated by subtracting the existing use from the proposed Project. As shown, the Project is anticipated to generate a net increase of 56 two-way trips per day, 10 more AM peak hour trips, and 8 more PM peak hour trips as compared to the existing use. TABLE 3: TRIP GENERATION COMPARISON AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Land Use In Out Total In Out Total Daily Existing Use 3 1 4 1 3 4 28 Proposed Project 7 7 14 6 6 12 84 Net Change (Proposed - Existing) 4 6 10 5 3 8 56 FINDINGS The development of the proposed Project (school district office) is anticipated to generate more trips than the existing (currently approved) industrial use. The net increase in trip generation and total trips generated are below 50 peak hour trips. As such, additional traffic analysis beyond this trip generation assessment does not appear to be necessary as the effects on transportation operations (level of service) are not significant. If you have any questions or comments, I can be reached at rvu@urbanxroads.com. Respectfully submitted, URBAN CROSSROADS, INC. 1 Jose Alire, P.E. Senior Traffic Engineer Robert Vu, P.E. Transportation Engineer V ur�r—�OSSROADS 26 — 212 141kA1Aq?4Aerno Exhibit 8 - Community Meeting Documents M �' kx uan FY .` E kd March 10, 2023 Ms. Fernanda Arias Santa Ana Planning Division 20 Civic Center Plaza, M-20 Santa Ana, CA. 92702 RE: Submittal of March 6, 2023, Sunshine Meeting documents —Vista Charter Public Schools Dear Ms. Arias, On behalf of Vista Charter Public Schools and Red Hook Capital Partners, please find the enclosed materials required by the Sunshine Ordinance for the March 6, 2023 meeting for the Vista Charter Public Schools proposed zone change (amendment application) and amendments to the SD-82 zoning district at 601 N. Fairview Street. The following material are provided for your use: 1. Community meeting notice (English and Spanish) 2. List of property owners within 1000 feet of the site 3. List of occupants within 1000 feet of the site 4. The 1000-foot notification radius map 5. Proof of publication in the local newspaper 6. Meeting agenda 7. Sign -in sheet 8. Copy of the PowerPoint presentation for the meeting 9. Meeting minutes/Questions and answers This letter confirms, under penalty of perjury, that the required meeting, notifications and materials were prepared and distributed in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance of the City of Santa Ana. Respectfully, Vince FregosC! o The Fregoso Group On behalf of Vista Charter Public Schools City Council 26 — 213 1/16/2024 SUNSHINE ORDINANCE COMMUNITY MEETING NOTICE You are invited to attend a Community Meeting for the project described below: Subject: Amend the zoning of the northwest parcel from industrial to Specific Development No. 82 (SD-82) to be consistent with the majority of the parcel and to amend the Operational Standards of the SD-82 zoning to allow outdoor recreation areas. Spanish language translators will be available during the meeting. Location: 2609 West Fifth Street (Vista Heritage Bay 3 Cafeteria) Meeting Date: Monday, March 6, 2023 Meeting Time: 5:30 pm to 6:30 pm Meeting Location: Vista Heritage Bay 3 Cafeteria 2609 West Fifth Street Notification A Project Site: Meeting Site: For more information, contact Vince Fregoso at 714-904-4506 or Ingrid Canedo at 818-309-3664 City Council 26 — 214 1/16/2024 SUNSHINE ORDINANCE AVISO DE REUNION COMUNITARIA Esta invitado en asistir a una reunion comunitaria al trato del proyecto de desarrollo descrito en adelante: Prop6sito: Enmendar la zonificaci6n industrial de la propiedad ubicada en la parte noroeste de la escuela. El emendar la zonificacion Nu. 82 (SD-82) para que coincida con la parte mayoria del terreno junto, que viene siendo la escuela. La modificaci6n tambien agregara terminos generales a la zona SD-82 para incluir actividades fisicas al aire libre. Traductores en lenguaje espanol estardn presentes durante la reuni6n. Ubicaci6n: 2609 West Fifth Street (la cafeteria de bay 3 de Vista Heritage School) Fecha de reuni6n: Lunes, 6 de Marzo de 2023 Hora de reuni6n: 5:30 p. m. a 6:30 p. m. Lugar de reuni6n: La cafeteria de bay 3 de Vista Heritage School 2609 West Fifth Street Notification A Project Site: Meeting Site: Para m6s informaci6n, comuniquese con Vince Fregoso al 714-904-4506 o Ingrid Canedo al 818-309-3664 City Council 26 — 215 1/16/2024 #1 !, 004-152-01 !US MAPS 4 LESS ARMANDO & JOSEFINA E ESPARZA 2222 W 10TH ST �v�vr�.ratJirisntaps4less.cai�t ( (909) 997-9357 SANTA ANA CA 92703 ORDER NO: 2023-26 DATE:02109/2023 #3 004-152-10 HOLDINGS SORENTO 2209 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #6 004-152-13 ESTHER AVALOS MAFFEY 2225 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #9 004-153-02 ESTELA LORA GUERRERO 2230 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #12 004-153-05 REBECCA P CAMPOS 2218 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #15 004-153-08 LONG TRAN 2206 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #18 004-153-11 RODOLFO & STELLA LICERIO 2141 W CIVIC CENTER DR SANTA ANA CA 92703 #21 004-153-14 IGNACIO D GONZALES 2205 CIVIC CENTER DR WEST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #24 004-153-18 MASTAN INC 811 N FAIRVIEW ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #27 004-183-02 CARLOS H PEREGRINA 2130 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #4 004-152-11 HOLLY NHIHA LE 2217 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #7 004-152-14 CANDIDA G OLIVAS 2229 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #10 004-153-03 STEVEN HUU & TAMMY CHANH NGUYEN 6945 ALTAIR CT CORONA CA 92880 #13 004-153-06 TEODULO MONTIEL ADAME 2214 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #16 004-153-09 DANIEL PEREZ & JILL E AVILA 2202 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #19 004-153-12 NGOC TRAN 2145 W CIVIC CENTER DR SANTA ANA CA 92703 #22 004-153-16 SOUTHLAND HOMES REAL ESTATE & INVESTMENT 10448 SALINAS RIVER CIR FOUNTAIN VALLEY CA 92708 #25 004-153-20 EDELIRA MORENO 2209 W CIVIC CENTER DR SANTA ANA CA 92703 #28 004-183-03 VICTORIA FLORES RODRIGUEZ 2126 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #2 004-152-09 HOLDINGS SORENTO 2209 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #5 004-152-12 ERIC R LOPEZ 2221 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #8 004-153-01 WINSTON HUYNH 2234 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #11 004-153-04 DIOSFORO & MARIA E SERNA 2222 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #14 004-153-07 ANTONIO RODRIGUEZTRUJILLO 2210 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #17 004-153-10 RICARDO H & ANA L HARO 2137 CIVIC CENTER DR WEST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #20 004-153-13 ANDY 0 MUNOZ 2019 VALENCIA ST SANTA ANA CA 92706 #23 004-153-17 JUAN 0 & CAROLYN E MEDRANO 2221 W CIVIC CENTER DR SANTA ANA CA 92703 #26 004-183-01 SERG10 MORE NO JUAREZ 2134 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #29 004-183-15 ANDREW JONATHAN & DIANA ROSE MUNOZ 2129 W CIVIC CENTER DR SANTA ANA CA 92703 City Council 26 — 216 1/16/2024 #30 #31 #32 004-183-16 004-183-17 004-183-22 DAVID NGUYEN MICHAEL B MATTINGLEY HERIBERTO & MARIA MERCADO 3361 RURAL CIR 4006 CALLE MARLENA 2121 CIVIC CENTER DR CORONA CA 92882 SAN CLEMENTE CA 92672 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #33 #34 #35 004-183-24 007-021-02 007-021-03 REYNALDO & ZOILA VERGARA TUAN HOANG NGUYEN ARTURO F DURAZO 2125 CIVIC CTR 7662 LEHIEN PL 2321 6TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 WESTMINSTER CA 92683 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #36 #37 #38 007-021-04 007-021-05 007-021-06 NESTOR ALEJANDRES GEORGE B COBARRUVIA EUGENE JONES 2317 6TH ST 2309 6TH ST 12921 ROSALIND DR SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92705 #39 #40 #41 007-021-08 007-021-10 007-021-14 JOSE & YOLANDA ZAVALA TUNG DINH PHAN 1PACIFIC INTERNATIONAL TR6TH SA GARDENS 2339 6TH ST 14822 ALCESTER ST 13043 BACH WAY SANTA ANA CA 92703 WESTMINSTER CA 92683 CERRITOS CA 90703 #42 #43 #44 007-022-01 007-022-04 007-022-05 FOR THE SOUL LLC HOMES MICHAEL A MADZOEFF MICHAEL A MADZOEFF 1616 FLOWER AVE 211 MARIGOLD AVE 211 MARIGOLD AVE FULLERTON CA 92833 CORONA DEL MAR CA 92625 CORONA DEL MAR CA 92625 #45 #46 #47 007-022-06 007-022-07 007-022-09 MICHAEL A MADZOEFF MICHAEL A MADZOEFF JAKE J YOON 211 MARIGOLD AVE 211 MARIGOLD AVE 2301 5TH ST CORONA DEL MAR CA 92625 CORONA DEL MAR CA 92625 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #48 #49 #50 007-022-13 007-022-16 007-022-17 INDELISA QUINTERO MICHAEL A MADZOEFF MICHAEL A MADZOEFF 2424 6TH ST 211 MARIGOLD AVE 211 MARIGOLD AVE SANTA ANA CA 92703 CORONA DEL MAR CA 92625 CORONA DEL MAR CA 92625 #51 #52 #53 007-022-19 007-022-20 007-022-21 JAKE J YOON FRANCISCO JAVIER PERAZA LA RIVA ROSIE V DE 2301 5TH ST 2414 6TH ST 2418 6TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #54 #55 #56 007-022-23 007-022-24 007-022-25 AVA ENTERPRISES MICHAEL A MADZOEFF MICHAEL A MADZOEFF 2831 1ST ST 211 MARIGOLD AVE 211 MARIGOLD AVE SANTA ANA CA 92703 CORONA DEL MAR CA 92625 CORONA DEL MAR CA 92625 #57 #58 #59 007-022-26 007-022-29 007-022-30 ORANGE COUNTY TRANSIT RICK D KAGASOFF JAKE J YOON PO BOX 14184 2023 HELIOTROPE 2301 5TH ST ORANGE CA 92863 SANTA ANA CA 92706 SANTA ANA CA 92703 City Council 26 — 217 1/16/2024 #60 #61 #62 007-022-31 007-022-32 007-022-33 MICHAEL A MAD ZOEFF JAKE J YOON MICHAEL A MAD ZOEFF 211 MARIGOLD AVE 2301 5TH ST 211 MARIGOLD AVE CORONA DEL MAR CA 92625 SANTA ANA CA 92703 CORONA DEL MAR CA 92625 #63 #64 #65 007-110-01 007-120-24 007-120-25 KEVIN OVERGAAUW RICK D KAGASOFF T R KIRWAN 2308 5TH ST 2023 HELIOTROPE 5133 LORELEI AVE SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92706 LAKEWOOD CA 90712 #66 #67 #68 007-120-26 007-120-27 007-120-28 JOSE LUIS CHOCOTECO CHARLES A HATFIELD CHUNG-YEN & YEN -LING HUANG 1002 ROSITA ST 25852 PECOS RD 18819 MT SCHELIN CIR SANTA ANA CA 92703 LAGUNA HILLS CA 92653 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CA 92708 #69 #70 #71 007-120-43 007-120-44 007-120-46 KELLY E CHAPMAN KELLY E CHAPMAN DION C CHAPMAN 24242 SANTA CLARA AVE 11 24242 SANTA CLARA AVE 11 30442 BENECIA DANA POINT CA 92629 DANA POINT CA 92629 LAGUNA NIGUEL CA 92677 #72 #73 #74 007-120-48 007-121-01 007-121-02 ORANGE COUNTY TRANSIT RICK D KAGASOFF FIFTH STREET CAPITAL WEST P O BOX 3005 2023 HELIOTROPE 55 FANLIGHT GARDEN GROVE CA 92840 SANTA ANA CA 92705 IRVINE CA 92620 #75 #76 #77 007-121-03 007-121-04 007-121-05 MARANATHA REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS LLC HBBF RICK D KAGASOFF 411 SULLIVAN ST 410 NANTUCKET PL 2023 HELIOTROPE DR SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92706 #78 #79 #80 007-121-06 007-121-07 007-121-08 RICK D KAGASOFF CYMC LLC CYMC LLC 2023 HELIOTROPE 321 SULLIVAN ST 301 SULLIVAN ST SANTA ANA CA 92705 SANTA ANA CA SANTA ANA CA 92703 #81 #82 #83 007-121-09 007-121-10 007-141-04 CYMC LLC RICK D KAGASOFF CHRIS R SOLDAN 2430 CAPE COD WAY 2023 HELIOTROPE DR 7243 CAMBRIA CIR SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92706 ORANGE CA 92869 #84 #85 #86 007-141-11 007-141-24 007-141-26 SPACE PROPERTIES TWO LLC EXTRA PHUC VIETTRAN RICK D KAGASOFF 2795 COTTONWOOD PKWY #400 126 MAXINE ST 2023 HELIOTROPE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84121 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92706 #87 #88 #89 007-141-29 007-141-31 007-141-35 W& M PROPERTIES W& M PROPERTIES F C B PROPERTIES 1479 MUSTANG AVE 1479 MUSTANG AVE 6138 JAMES ALAN ST ORANGE CA 92869 ORANGE CA 92869 CYPRESS CA 90630 City Council 26 — 218 1/16/2024 #90 #91 #92 007-141-42 007-141-66 007-141-67 CHRIS R SOLDAN MAS LLC YIA ANA MINI STORAGE SANTA 7243 CAMBRIA CIR 16741 GLENHAVEN LN 5901 ENCINA RD C-5 ORANGE CA 92869 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 GOLETA CA 93117 #93 #94 #95 007-141-76 007-141-77 007-142-01 CHRIS R SOLDAN W & M PROPERTIES GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF ORANGE COUNTY 7243 CAMBRIA CIR 1479 MUSTANG AVE CA ORANGE CA 92869 ORANGE CA 92869 410 FAIRVIEW ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #96 #97 #98 007-351-01 007-351-02 007-351-03 MOHAMMAD ARAFEEN QUERASHI MOHAMMAD ARAFEEN QUERASHI MARIA FLORES 6633 PASEO FIESTA DR 6633 PASEO FIESTA DR 2230 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE WEST ANAHEIM HILLS CA 92703 ANAHEIM HILLS CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92701 #99 #100 #101 007-351-04 007-351-05 007-351-06 JOHN A MONREAL KENNY QUYEN LIEU EZEQUIEL SEGURA 2226 CIVIC CENTER DR WEST 2222 CIVIC CENTER DR 2218 CIVIC CENTER DR SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #102 #103 #104 007-351-07 007-351-08 007-351-09 RODRIGO SANTIAGO PACHECO REYMUNDO & EVA M DOMINGUEZ JOSE PATINO 2214 CIVIC CENTER DR 2210 CIVIC CENTER DR WEST 2206 CIVIC CENTER DR SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #105 #106 #107 007-351-10 007-351-11 007-351-14 NHUT NGOC NGUYEN RAYMOND M ZAMORA NOE & MIREYA VARGAS 801 COURTNEY 2148 CIVIC CENTER DR WEST 2136 CIVIC CENTER DR FULLERTON CA 92833 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #108 #109 #110 007-351-15 007-351-16 007-351-19 ANDRES FLORES VI NA PROPERTIES FAUSTO MACHADO 2132 CIVIC CTR 7241 WESTMINSTER BLVD 2116 CIVIC CENTER DR WEST SANTA ANA CA 92703 WESTMINSTER CA 92683 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #111 #112 #113 007-351-24 007-351-26 007-351-28 VENA & JULIE F SCANLAN EPIFANIO GONZALEZ ALEJANDRO GAVINA 2144 CIVIC CENTER DR 2140 CIVIC DR 2124 CIVIC CENTER DR SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #114 #115 #116 007-351-30 007-351-32 007-352-02 CONSTANTINO SALINAS RODRIGUEZ JOSE D ORTIZ CHRISTOPHER A OVIEDO 2120 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE WEST 2112 CIVIC CENTER DR 2105 7TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #117 #118 #119 007-352-03 007-352-04 007-352-05 ESTEVAN N RAMIREZ ROGELIO SILVA LUIS MELCHOR PENALOZA 2110 7TH ST 2113 7TH ST 2117 7TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 City Council 26 — 219 1/16/2024 #120 #121 #122 007-352-06 007-352-07 007-352-08 JARELY MELCHOR HUAN NGUYEN RAUL LOPEZ 2121 7TH ST 2125 7TH ST 2129 7TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #123 #124 #125 007-352-09 007-352-10 007-352-11 YANLING SUN JAIME MUNOZ SIMONA M PERALES 2133 7TH ST 1730 WASHINGTON 2201 7TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92706 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #126 #127 #129 007-352-12 007-352-13 007-352-14 ROMAN ANTHONY REYNA JOANNA L PETERSON HECTOR MELENDEZ 2205 7TH ST 2533 HESPERIAN ST 2213 7TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92706 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #129 #130 #131 007-352-15 007-352-16 007-352-17 SERGIO GASCA MANRIQUEZ MACXIMILLIANO P CEBALLOS ELVA MENDEZ 2217 7TH ST 2221 17TH ST 2225 7TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #132 4133 #134 007-352-18 007-352-19 007-352-20 FERNANDO RODRIGUEZ CHAVEZ VICTOR MANUEL PEREZ JOSE V VALDEZ 2229 7TH ST 2233 7TH ST 2237 7TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #135 #136 #137 007-352-23 007-352-24 007-352-25 THACH JADE HOANG CHUONG MAI JUAN DIAZ 2242 7TH ST 2238 7TH ST 2234 7TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #138 #139 #140 007-352-26 007-352-27 007-352-28 ROBERT ANTHONY FLORES CATHY L BUENDIA RACHEL CAMACHO 2230 7TH ST 2226 7TH ST 1242 CEDAR SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92707 #141 #142 #143 007-352-29 007-352-30 007-352-31 CATALINA & JOSE A ANDRADE JOHNNY C NGUYEN ESTHER C GONZALEZ 2218 7TH ST 2214 7TH ST 2210 7TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #144 #145 #146 007-352-32 007-352-33 007-352-34 KHIET DO MARGARITA CORTES LILIANA FAUSTO 2206 7TH ST 2202 7TH ST 2138 7TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #147 #148 #149 007-352-35 007-352-36 007-352-37 BRAD & WENDY PEIKERT BRAD & WENDY PEIKERT ENRIQUE PENA 2130 7TH ST 2130 7TH ST 2126 7TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 City Council 26 — 220 1/16/2024 #150 #151 #1S2 007-352-38 007-352-39 007-352-40 ISRAEL VERGARA ALVAREZ ISRAEL & ELEAZER MONTES VERGARA AGUSTIN & MARICELA ANAYA 2122 7TH ST 2118 7TH ST 2114 7TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #153 007-352-41 ESTEVAN N RAMIREZ 2110 7TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #156 198-151-35 KIM EAR WONG 12636 CASA BONITA PL VICTORVILLE CA 92392 #159 405-211-03 SCHOOL SANTA ANA UNIFIEDDISTRICT 1601 CHESTNUT AVE SANTA ANA CA 92701 #162 405-211-08 ROSA MENDIVIL 1424 LOWELL ST SANTA ANA CA 92706 #165 405-211-11 LUIS B & MARIA D L RODRIGUEZ 2520 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #168 405-211-14 DANH C NGUYEN 2606 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #171 405-211-17 ALFREDA & PABLO JUAREZ 2618 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #174 405-211-20 BERTRAM F RUDOLPH P 0 BOX 2302 CARMEL CA 93921 4177 405-211-36 SCHOOL SANTA ANA UNIFIEDDISTRICT 1405 FRENCH ST SANTA ANA CA 92701 #154 007-352-42 EDNA L MEJIA 1238 BAKER ST SANTA ANA CA 92707 #157 405-211-01 SCHOOL SANTA ANA UNIFIEDDISTRICT 1405 FRENCH ST SANTA ANA CA 92701 #160 405-211-04 SCHOOL SANTA ANA UNIFIEDDISTRICT 1405 FRENCH ST SANTA ANA CA 92701 #163 405-211-09 THAI JENNIFER LOAN 9350 BOLSA AVE SPC 58 WESTMINSTER CA 92683 #166 405-211-12 JUAN JUAREZ HERNANDEZ 2528 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #169 405-211-15 MAIRA & NOEL ISRAEL AYALA 1718 TURQUOISE DR CORONA CA 92882 #172 405-211-18 NGUYEN VIETCAO 16576 MT TODD ST FOUNTAIN VALLEY CA 92708 #175 405-211-22 TAI VAN LAM 11460 VIA PLAYA CORTES WAY SAN DIEGO CA 92124 #178 405-212-01 MY TRAN DUE LUU 9509 PRICHARD ST BELLFLOWER CA 90706 #155 007-352-46 MOHAMMAD ARAFEEN QUERASHI 6633 PASEO FIESTA DR ANAHEIM HILLS CA 92703 #158 405-211-02 SCHOOL SANTA ANA UNIFIEDDISTRICT 1405 FRENCH ST SANTA ANA CA 92701 #161 405-211-07 GERALD L HIGDON 12692 BONITA HEIGHTS DR SANTA ANA CA 92705 #164 405-211-10 ORVILLE N ROSEBEARY 16461 VENUS DR WESTMINSTER CA 92683 #167 405-211-13 FELIX CIBRIAN 2534 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #170 405-211-16 IRMA OROZCO 11858 MAYFLOWER CIR FOUNTAIN VALLEY CA 92708 #173 405-211-19 RODOLFO MUNOZ 2624 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #176 405-211-23 SOUTHLAND HOMES REAL 10448 SALINAS RIVER CI FOUNTAIN VALLEY CA 92708 #179 405-212-02 GUADALUPE OLEA 933 FAIR WAY SANTA ANA CA 92703 City Council 26 — 221 1/16/2024 #180 #181 405-212-09 405-212-10 MARCELINO & EUSTOLIAJUAREZ TENTH DO 924 MARENGO PL 422 MAXINE ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92704 #183 #184 405-213-01 405-213-02 DENISE LE DENISE LE 1002 FAIRVIEW ST 1002 FAIRVIEW ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #186 #187 405-213-05 405-213-06 CUAUHTEMOC FERNANDEZ RAYMOND C C YANG 25219TH ST 2628 DEEGAN DR SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92704 #189 #190 405-213-14 405-221-01 OF SANTA ANA CITY SCHOOL SANTA ANA UNIFIEDDIST OF ORANGE 20 CIVIC CENTER PLAZA M-30 1405 FRENCH ST SANTA ANA CA 92701 SANTA ANA CA 92701 #192 #193 405-221-03 405-221-05 SCHOOL SANTA ANA UNIFIEDDIST OF ORANGE ORANGE COUNTY TRANSIT 1405 FRENCH ST P 0 BOX 3005 SANTA ANA CA 92701 GARDEN GROVE CA 92840 #195 405-241-01 PARCEL HOLD #198 405-241-03 KITCHENS QOZB FAIRVIEW 402 OCEAN VIEW AVE ENCINITAS CA 92024 #201 939-45-057 CALVARIO TEMPLO 25015TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 4204 939-45-059 CALVARIO TEMPLO 2501 5TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #207 939-45-060 2609 W 5TH STREET 2900 TEMPLE ST LOS ANGELES CA 90026 #196 405-241-01 PARCEL HOLD #199 405-241-04 2609 W 5TH STREET 2900 TEMPLE ST LOS ANGELES CA 90026 #202 939-45-058 CALVARIO TEMPLO 25015TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #205 939-45-059 CALVARIO TEMPLO 2501 5TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #208 939-45-061 2609 W 5TH STREET 2900 TEMPLE ST LOS ANGELES CA 90026 #182 405-212-11 MANUEL GARCIA RIZO 2607 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #185 405-213-04 JORGE G FRUTOS 2517 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #188 405-213-07 DIANA MELINA VALENZUELA PEREZ 927 MARENGO PL SANTA ANA CA 92703 #191 405-221-02 SCHOOL SANTA ANA UNIFIEDDIST OF ORANGE 1405 FRENCH ST SANTA ANA CA 92701 #194 405-221-07 SCHOOL SANTA ANA UNIFIEDDIST OF ORANGE 1405 FRENCH ST SANTA ANA CA 92701 #197 405-241-02 ORANGE COUNTY TRANSIT P 0 BOX 3005 GARDEN GROVE CA 92840 #200 939-45-057 CALVARIO TEMPLO 2501 5TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #203 939-45-058 CALVARIO TEMPLO 2501 5TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #206 939-45-060 2609 W 5TH STREET 2900 TEMPLE ST LOS ANGELES CA 90026 #209 939-45-061 2609 W 5TH STREET 2900 TEMPLE ST LOS ANGELES CA 90026 City Council 26 — 222 1/16/2024 #210 #211 #212 939-45-062 939-45-062 939-45-063 2609 W 5TH STREET 2609 W 5TH STREET GENERATION TILE & MARBLE NEW 2900 TEMPLE ST 2900 TEMPLE ST 563 FAIRVIEW ST LOS ANGELES CA 90026 LOS ANGELES CA 90026 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #213 #214 #215 939-45-063 939-45-064 939-45-064 GENERATION TILE & MARBLE NEW WILBERT MARRUFO WILBERT MARRUFO 563 FAIRVIEW ST 559 FAIRVIEW ST 559 FAIRVIEW ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #216 #217 #218 939-45-065 939-45-065 939-45-066 WILBERT MARRUFO WILBERT MARRUFO DHANANJAYA N MHASKAR 555 FAIRVIEW ST 555 FAIRVIEW ST 3972 BARRANCA PKWY J158 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 IRVINE CA 92606 #219 #220 #221 939-45-066 939-45-067 939-45-067 DHANANJAYA N MHASKAR SCOTTY LEE SCOTTY LEE 3972 BARRANCA PKWY J158 13791 DIEPPE CIR 13791 DIEPPE CIR IRVINE CA 92606 GARDEN GROVE CA 92843 GARDEN GROVE CA 92843 #222 #223 #224 939-45-068 939-45-068 939-45-069 CURTIS & BETTY TOM CURTIS & BETTY TOM EN HONG & JANG LAN SHEN 24982 LUNA BONITA DR 24982 LUNA BONITA DR 3314 MEADOWRIDGE LAGUNA HILLS CA 92653 LAGUNA HILLS CA 92653 ORANGE CA 92867 #225 #226 #227 939-45-069 939-45-070 939-45-070 EN HONG & JANG LAN SHEN EDWARD DONLEY EDWARD DONLEY 3314 MEADOWRIDGE 19432 CLOVER 19432 CLOVER ORANGE CA 92867 SANTA ANA CA 92705 SANTA ANA CA 92705 #228 #229 #230 939-45-071 939-45-071 939-45-072 BARRYJ EINCK BARRYJ EINCK ROBERTC HUNT 14681 DANBERRY CIR 14681 DANBERRY CIR 28371 MODJESKA CANYON RD TUSTIN CA 92780 TUSTIN CA 92780 MODJESKA CA 92676 #231 #232 #233 939-45-072 939-45-073 939-45-073 ROBERT C HUNT TAI TAN PHAM TAI TAN PHAM 28371 MODJESKA CANYON RD 302 TULIP TREE AVE 302 TULIP TREE AVE MODJESKA CA 92676 ORANGE CA 92865 ORANGE CA 92865 #234 939-45-074 HANH BICH HOANG 16572 GRAHAM PL HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 #235 939-45-074 HANH BICH HOANG 16572 GRAHAM PL HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 City Council 26 — 223 1/16/2024 #1 #2 #3 004-152-01 004-152-09 004-152-10 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2222 W 10TH ST 2209 W 9TH ST 2213 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #4 #5 #6 004-152-11 004-152-12 004-152-13 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2217 W 9TH ST 2221 W 9TH ST 2225 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #7 #8 #9 004-152-14 004-153-01 004-153-02 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2229 W 9TH ST 2234 W 9TH ST 2230 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #10 #11 #12 004-153-03 004-153-04 004-153-05 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2226 W 9TH ST 2222 W 9TH ST 2218 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #13 #14 #15 004-153-06 004-153-07 004-153-08 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2214 W 9TH ST 2210 W 9TH ST 2206 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #16 #17 #18 004-153-09 004-153-10 004-153-11 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2202 W 9TH ST 2137 W CIVIC CENTER DR 2141 W CIVIC CENTER DR SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #19 #20 #21 004-153-12 004-153-13 004-153-14 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2145 W CIVIC CENTER DR 2201 W CIVIC CENTER DR 2205 W CIVIC CENTER DR SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #22 #23 #24 004-153-16 004-153-17 004-153-18 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2217 W CIVIC CENTER DR 2221 W CIVIC CENTER DR 809 N FAIRVIEW ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #24 #24 #24 004-153-18 004-153-18 004-153-18 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 811 N FAIRVIEW ST 813 N FAIRVIEW ST 815 N FAIRVIEW ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #25 #26 #27 004-153-20 004-183-01 004-183-02 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2209 W CIVIC CENTER DR 2134 W 9TH ST 2130 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 City Council 26 — 224 1/16/2024 #28 #29 #30 004-183-03 004-193-15 004-183-16 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2126 W 9TH ST 2129 W CIVIC CENTER DR 2133 W CIVIC CENTER DR SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #31 #32 #33 004-183-17 004-183-22 004-183-24 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2119 W CIVIC CENTER OR 2121 W CIVIC CENTER DR 2125 W CIVIC CENTER DR SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #34 #35 #36 007-021-02 007-021-03 007-021-04 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2325 W 6TH ST 2321 W 6TH ST 2317 W 6TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #37 #38 #39 007-021-05 007-021-06 007-021-08 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2309 W 6TH ST 2307 W 6TH ST 2339 W 6TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #40 #41 #42 007-021-10 007-021-14 007-022-01 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2331 W 6TH ST 2333 W 6TH ST 2430 W 6TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #43 #44 #45 007-022-04 007-022-05 007-022-06 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2334 W 6TH ST 2328 W 6TH ST 2324 W 6TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #46 #47 #48 007-022-07 007-022-09 007-022-13 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2318 W 6TH ST 2304 W 6TH ST 2424 W 6TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #49 #50 #51 007-022-16 007-022-17 007-022-19 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2325 W 5TH ST 2317 W 5TH ST 2310 W 6TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #52 #53 #54 007-022-20 007-022-21 007-022-23 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2414 W 6TH ST 2418 W 6TH ST 2338 W 6TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #55 #56 #57 007-022-24 007-022-25 007-022-26 NO CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT NO CURRENT OCCUPANT 2329 W 5TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 City Council 26 — 225 1/16/2024 #58 #59 #60 007-022-29 007-022-30 007-022-31 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2415 W 5TH ST 2301 W 5TH ST 2314 W 6TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #61 #62 #63 007-022-32 007-022-33 007-110-01 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2301 W 5TH ST 2315 W 5TH ST 2308 W 5TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #64 #65 #66 007-120-24 007-120-25 007-120-26 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2400 W 5TH ST 2401 CAPE COD WAY Al2 2350 W 5TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #67 #68 #69 007-120-27 007-120-28 007-120-43 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2351 CAPE COD WAY 2330 W 5TH ST 2341 CAPE COD WAY SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #70 #71 #72 007-120-44 007-120-46 007-120-48 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT NO CURRENT OCCUPANT 2331 CAPE COD WAY 2321 CAPE COD WAY SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #73 #74 #75 007-121-01 007-121-02 007-121-03 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2430 W 5TH ST 2410 W 5TH ST 411 N SULLIVAN ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #76 #77 #78 007-121-04 007-121-05 007-121-06 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 410 NANTUCKET PL 401 N SULLIVAN ST 400 NANTUCKET PL SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #79 #80 #81 007-121-07 007-121-08 007-121-09 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 321 N SULLIVAN ST 301 N SULLIVAN ST 2430 CAPE COD WAY SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #82 #83 #84 007-121-10 007-141-04 007-141-11 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2420 CAPE COD WAY 302 N SULLIVAN ST 2602 W 5TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #85 #86 #87 007-141-24 007-141-26 007-141-29 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2520 W 5TH ST 2518 W 5TH ST 408 N SULLIVAN ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 City Council 26 — 226 1/16/2024 #88 #89 #90 007-141-31 007-141-35 007-141-42 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 406 N SULLIVAN ST 412 N SULLIVAN ST 402 N SULLIVAN ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #91 #92 #93 007-141-66 007-141-67 007-141-76 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 419 N FAIRVIEW ST 401 N FAIRVIEW ST 308 N SULLIVAN ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #94 #95 #96 007-141-77 007-142-01 007-351-01 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 404 N SULLIVAN ST 404 N FAIRVIEW ST 711 N FAIRVIEW ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #97 #98 #99 007-351-02 007-351-03 007-351-04 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 711 N FAIRVIEW ST 2230 W CIVIC CENTER DR 2226 W CIVIC CENTER DR SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #100 #101 #102 007-351-05 007-351-06 007-351-07 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2222 W CIVIC CENTER DR 2218 W CIVIC CENTER DR 2214 W CIVIC CENTER DR SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #103 #104 #105 007-351-08 007-351-09 007-351-10 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2210 W CIVIC CENTER DR 2206 W CIVIC CENTER DR 2202 W CIVIC CENTER DR SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #106 #107 #108 007-351-11 007-351-14 007-351-15 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2148 W CIVIC CENTER DR 2136 W CIVIC CENTER DR 2132 W CIVIC CENTER DR SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #109 #110 #111 007-351-16 007-351-19 007-351-24 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2128 W CIVIC CENTER DR 2116 W CIVIC CENTER DR 2144 W CIVIC CENTER DR SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #112 #113 #114 007-351-26 007-351-28 007-351-30 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2140 W CIVIC CENTER DR 2124 W CIVIC CENTER DR 2120 W CIVIC CENTER DR SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #115 #116 #117 007-351-32 007-352-02 007-352-03 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2112 W CIVIC CENTER DR 2105 W 7TH ST 2109 W 7TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 City Council 26 — 227 1/16/2024 #118 #119 #120 007-352-04 007-352-05 007-352-06 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2113 W 7TH ST 2117 W 7TH ST 2121 W 7TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #121 #122 #123 007-352-07 007-352-08 007-352-09 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2125 W 7TH ST 2129 W 7TH ST 2133 W 7TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #124 #125 #126 007-352-10 007-352-11 007-352-12 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2137 W 7TH ST 2201 W 7TH ST 2205 W 7TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #127 #128 #129 007-352-13 007-352-14 007-352-15 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2209 W 7TH ST 2213 W 7TH ST 2217 W 7TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #130 4131 #132 007-352-16 007-352-17 007-352-18 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2221 W 7TH ST 2225 W 7TH ST 2229 W 7TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #133 #134 #135 007-352-19 007-352-20 007-352-23 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2233 W 7TH ST 2237 W 7TH ST 2242 W 7TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #136 #137 #138 007-352-24 007-352-25 007-352-26 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2238 W 7TH ST 2234 W 7TH ST 2230 W 7TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #139 #140 #141 007-352-27 007-352-28 007-352-29 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2226 W 7TH ST 2222 W 7TH ST 2218 W 7TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #142 #143 #144 007-352-30 007-352-31 007-352-32 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2214 W 7TH ST 2210 W 7TH ST 2206 W 7TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #145 #146 #147 007-352-33 007-352-34 007-352-35 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2202 W 7TH ST 2138 W 7TH ST 2134 W 7TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 City Council 26 — 228 1/16/2024 #148 #149 #150 007-352-36 007-352-37 007-352-38 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2130 W 7TH ST 2126 W 7TH ST 2122 W 7TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA £A 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #151 #152 #153 007-352-39 007-352-40 007-352-41 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2118 W 7TH ST 2114 W 7TH ST 2110 W 7TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #154 #155 #156 007-352-42 007-352-46 198-151-35 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT NO CURRENT OCCUPANT 2106 W 7TH ST 711 N FAIRVIEW ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #157 #158 #159 405-211-01 405-211-02 405-211-03 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 730 N FAIRVIEW ST 750 N FAIRVIEW ST 720 N FAIRVIEW ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #160 #161 #162 405-211-04 405-211-07 405-211-08 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 804 N FAIRVIEW ST 2502 W 9TH ST 2506 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #163 #164 #165 405-211-09 405-211-10 405-211-11 CURRENT OCCUPANT NO CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2510 W 9TH ST 2520 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #166 #167 #168 405-211-12 405-211-13 405-211-14 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2526 W 9TH ST 2534 W 9TH ST 2604 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #169 #170 #171 405-211-15 405-211-16 405-211-17 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2608 W 9TH ST 2612 W 9TH ST 2616 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #172 #173 #174 405-211-18 405-211-19 405-211-20 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT NO CURRENT OCCUPANT 2620 W 9TH ST 2624 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #175 #176 #177 405-211-22 405-211-23 405-211-36 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT NO CURRENT OCCUPANT 916 FAIRWAY 920 FAIRWAY SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 City Council 26 — 229 1/16/2024 #178 #179 #180 405-212-01 405-212-02 405-212-09 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2611 W 9TH ST 933 FAIRWAY 924 MARENGO PL SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #181 #182 #183 405-212-10 405-212-11 405-213-01 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2535 W 9TH ST 2605 W 9TH ST 1002 N FAIRVIEW ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #184 #185 #186 405-213-02 405-213-04 405-213-05 NO CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2517 W 9TH ST 2521 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #187 #188 4189 405-213-06 405-213-07 405-213-14 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 923 MARENGO PL 927 MARENGO PL 2507 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #190 #191 #192 405-221-01 405-221-02 405-221-03 NO CURRENT OCCUPANT NO CURRENT OCCUPANT NO CURRENT OCCUPANT #193 #194 #195 405-221-05 405-221-07 405-241-01 NO CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT NO CURRENT OCCUPANT 2701 W 5TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #196 #197 #19$ 405-241-01 405-241-02 405-241-03 NO CURRENT OCCUPANT NO CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 501 N FAIRVIEW ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #199 #199 #199 405-241-04 405-241-04 405-241-04 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 601 N FAIRVIEW ST 651 N FAIRVIEW ST 633 N FAIRVIEW ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #199 #199 #200 405-241-04 405-241-04 939-45-057 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 643 N FAIRVIEW ST 615 N FAIRVIEW ST 2519 W 5TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #201 #202 4203 939-45-057 939-45-058 939-45-058 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2519 W STH ST 2511 W 5TH ST 2511 W 5TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 City Council 26 — 230 1/16/2024 #204 #205 #206 939-45-059 939-45-059 939-45-060 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2501 W 5TH ST 2501 W 5TH ST 2617 W 5TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #207 #208 #209 939-45-060 939-45-061 939-45-061 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2617 W 5TH ST 2609 W 5TH ST 2609 W 5TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #210 #211 #212 939-45-062 939-45-062 939-45-063 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2601 W 5TH ST 2601 W 5TH ST 563 N FAIRVIEW ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #213 #214 #215 939-45-063 939-45-064 939-45-064 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 563 N FAIRVIEW ST 559 N FAIRVIEW ST 559 N FAIRVIEW ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #216 #217 #218 939-45-065 939-45-065 939-45-066 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 555 N FAIRVIEW ST 555 N FAIRVIEW ST 551 N FAIRVIEW ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #219 #220 #221 939-45-066 939-45-067 939-45-067 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 551 N FAIRVIEW ST 547 N FAIRVIEW ST 547 N FAIRVIEW ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #222 #223 #224 939-45-068 939-45-068 939-45-069 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 539 N FAIRVIEW ST 539 N FAIRVIEW ST 531 N FAIRVIEW ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #225 #226 #227 939-45-069 939-45-070 939-45-070 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 531 N FAIRVIEW ST 527 N FAIRVIEW ST 527 N FAIRVIEW ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #228 #229 #230 939-45-071 939-45-071 939-45-072 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 523 N FAIRVIEW ST 523 N FAIRVIEW ST 2501 W 5TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #230 #231 #231 939-45-072 939-45-072 939-45-072 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2519 W 5TH ST 519 N FAIRVIEW ST 2609 W 5TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 City Council 26 — 231 1/16/2024 #231 939-45-072 CURRENT OCCUPANT 523 N FAIRVIEW ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #231 939-45-072 CURRENT OCCUPANT 563 N FAIRVIEW ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #234 939-45-074 CURRENT OCCUPANT 511 N FAIRVIEW ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #231 939-45-072 CURRENT OCCUPANT 547 N FAIRVIEW ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #232 939-45-073 CURRENT OCCUPANT 515 N FAIRVIEW ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #235 939-45-074 CURRENT OCCUPANT 511 N FAIRVIEW ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #231 939-45-072 CURRENT OCCUPANT 555 N FAIRVIEW ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #233 939-45-073 CURRENT OCCUPANT 515 N FAIRVIEW ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 City Council 26 — 232 1/16/2024 RADIUS MAP 1000' SUBJECT PROPERTY ADDRESS: 601 N. FAIRVIEW AVE., SANTAANA, CA92703 APN : 405-241-04 u 95 H H CO I Map Date: 2/9/2023 Graphic Data Source Orange County Geographic Information System Base Parcel Database (Derived from APN Maps) Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane California V FIPS O405 Feet Datum: North American 1983 ' / W 10TH ST Legend jV/ © ® Subject Property 1000' Radius Mailing Lisl W 9TH 2d 2� 9 U 11 12 13 14 95 16 2$ 27 4`28 22 25 21 27} 19 1$ 17 ;� f` S6 97 9s 134 155 135 136 147 W CIVIC CENTER DR W 7TH ST Latest equalized assessment rolls obtained from the Orange ORDER NO. 2023-26 County Assessor's Office through ParcelQuest, a vendor service on 2/9/2023 1 US MAPS 4 LESS MiNING + Ft•K44FERING 0 250 500 1,000 www,radlusolaps41ess.corn ! (909)997.9357 N City Council 26 — 233 1/16/2024 ORANGE COUNTY REPORTER SINCE 1921-- Mailing Address: 600 W SANTA ANA BLVD STE 812, SANTA ANA, CA 92701 Telephone (714) 543-2027 / Fax (714) 542-6841 Visit us @ www.LegalAdstore.com Ingrid Canedo VISTA HERITAGE GLOBAL ACADEMY 2609 W. 5TH STREET SANTA ANA, CA 92703 COPY OF NOTICE Notice Type: GPN GOVT PUBLIC NOTICE Ad Description Vista Sunshine Meeting Notice To the right is a copy of the notice you sent to us for publication in the ORANGE COUNTY REPORTER. Thank you for using our newspaper. Please read this notice carefully and call us with any corrections. The Proof of Publication will be filed with the County Clerk, if required, and mailed to you after the last date below. Publication date(s) for this notice is (are): 02/24/2023 An invoice will be sent after the last date of publication. If you prepaid this order in full, you will not receive an invoice. Daily Journal Corporation Serving your legal advertising needs throughout California. ORANGE COUNTY REPORTER, SANTA ANA (714) 543-2027 BUSINESS JOURNAL, RIVERSIDE (951) 784-0111 DAILY COMMERCE, LOS ANGELES (213) 229-5300 LOS ANGELES DAILY JOURNAL, LOS ANGELES (213) 229-5300 SAN FRANCISCO DAILY JOURNAL, SAN FRANCISCO (800) 640-4829 SAN JOSE POST -RECORD, SAN JOSE (408) 287-4866 THE DAILY RECORDER, SACRAMENTO (916) 444-2355 THE DAILY TRANSCRIPT, SAN DIEGO (619) 232-3486 THE INTER -CITY EXPRESS, OAKLAND (510) 272-4747 uaii�iwiuiu OR# 3674151 26 — 234 1 /16/2024 AGENDA SUNSHINE ORDINANCE COMMUNITY MEETING NOTICE Monday, March 6, 2023 1. Welcome & Overview: Collin Felch, Ed.D., Assistant Super Intendent, Vista Heritage Global Academies 2. Vista Heritage Global Academies Santa Ana Project Details: Team: Don Wilson, Don Wilson, Ed.D., Superintendent, Vista Heritage Global Academies & Collin Felch, Ed.D., Assistant Super Intendent, Vista Heritage Global Academies • Introduction to the Vista Organization • Purpose of District office Space • Purpose of Outdoor Site improvements • Why Santa Ana • Benefits on converting what was on parcel previously into what it can/will be & how does that benefit the community? 3. Land Use Team • Site Overview & Zoning: Vince Fergoso, Principal, The Fergoso Group • Lot Size • Current Zone & use • Proposed Zone Amendments: • Proposed Use • Requested Application • Next Steps & Where we are at 4. Architecture Team —Tony Pacheco -Taylor, AIA, LEED® AP, Studio W Architects, • Building Gross ftz • Exterior architectural Improvements • Site Accessibility modifications • Interior spaces • Interior Upgrades created during improvements • Architectural features • Overall site and structural improvements summary 5. Transportation Engineer & Robert Uv, Traffic Engineer, Urban Xroods 0 Previous Pick up and Drop off & Revised Pick up and Drop Off City Council 26 — 235 1/16/2024 SUNSHINE ORDINANCE SIGN IN SHEET Monday, March 6, 2023 NAME EMAIL PHONE iF. C-C-p QN I/ 4h -V-taq urwQUA4, • vj*t n- 7Lj -,"3 - oO C", City Council 26-236 1/16/2024 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office & Outdoor Space Coming 2024 u City Council 26 — 237 1/16/2024 Who we are: • Vista Charter Public Schools operates 6 free public charter schools in Los Angeles and Orange County serving a total of 1,500 students. C City Council 26 — 238 Purpose of District office Space: • Vista Charter Public Schools Headquarters • Host Monthly Board Meetings 1 /16/2024 Location: • 68% of VCPS student enrollment is currently in Orange County 5 ' I ST Vista District Office ACADEMY s CARVER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ' GARFIELD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL � STREETCAR ROUTE MAINTENANCE AND 749 • STOP STORAGE F ACILITY(MSF) ONE-WAVTPAVEL ri • WILLOWICK: POTENTIAL FUTURE STOP dPh0WPutil6 $V•wtosancle 0 IANTATRANS ANA CIVIC CENTER DISTRICT TRANSPORTATION CENTER ORTATIREGIONALEN STATION DISTRICT LOSSAN RAIL CORRIDOR Cit TRICT & 26 — 239 Organizational Hub: • Auto shop acquisition created an opportunity to have a district office located next to our largest school. West Santa Ana Branch Transit Corridor 1 /16/2024 COMMUNITY IMPACT UA LIN , a. " . a Echo Entertaimen . . I '' i 55: 5z ni, i ?4rN w . i OUTDOOR SITE IMPROVEMENTS 17 I pill -t 'El �f4+,34 irk : J , Fr Wpx' dAr"�r 1ij+� J�.ir?' !73 ref Y a -i +�. � i_ x^ f�'"�,�.•tit ,y,�o�¢ 4�' � 4gd hw ��Ar,�t. r �r `y,' `� F; y�+5 i "R.,`• S+�Y� � Y"- V � t,t^�. n �' f r++.; AW 1 G . 2609 W. 5TH ST. & 601 N. FAIRVIEW PARCEL DIVISION AND PARKING DESIGNATION MAP ---''PARCEL4 E\CLL'SIV UILDIN _ c F1 • PARCEL 4 V. VEHICULAR INGRFSS/FGRFSS 1lI, I I I I I `I !i 3— i k VI•A ISn MPLO SHARED CXY EI PARKINGBUILDING C f7---3 L4i ABI;SINFSS PAPARKING Ei G lllll al'SISE�SS PARK R VISTA GLOBAL B ✓ M AC:ADEMIFS i _PARCEL 2 TE�PFo N — I U;s i r R — R ;BUILaNc D s — R VLSTArMMPLO SHARED --� PARKING- �II��II�I i 11 �lll��ill City Council -W16/2024 WEaT FIFTH A TART ENLARGED SITE PLAN • Additional lot to provide support functions (does not increase school capacity) • Provides 72 additional parking spaces/reduces impact to Business Park • Enhances student drop-off/pick-up functions • Encourages commercial use that is consistent with Business Park uses • Requires additional Sunshine Meeting (similar to this meeting) • Requires zone change for automotive parcel and amendment to Operational Standards to allow outdoor play area • Planning Commission review and recommendation • City Council action City Council 26 — 244 1 /16/2024 Ak 19'-4- AWAiSE'r- rm L J 1P rt WEST ELEVATION j 4.�.. -TO P-ARAPET PAINTED METAL CANOPY - KELLY MOORE BLACK - EAST ELEVATION 10.5 tr2OL �C 0' F.F. City Council 26 — 245 1/16/2024 10'-5 1 I .L) CA _ 19'-4" OL T.O. PARAPET 2 _ NVPY 6 3 7 F.F. NORTH ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION City Council 26 — 246 1/16/2024 CURRENT ROUTE (E) PAAICNG 3 r Ayy� J EXISTING Hy� BUKEIING 1I7� t (NOT 7N Z e e SCOPEI r g LN) PUBLIC ELFMEATfnRY z C11AflTER SOiOOL EWING e BUILDING iUP a ._ INOT IN -_ SCOPE) ,I.� Di Veh-de Circulation Bus Circulation e' Personal vehicle loading zone Bus loading zone EXISTING BUILDING INOT IN SCOPE) (WI Sth St 02 JA I VISTA HERITAGE CHARTER SCHOOL EXPANSION I TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS EXISTING - BIALOING INOT IN = SCOPE) _ 103 t PROPOSED ROUTE IN 5TH ST City Council 26 — 247 1/16/2024 CURRENT ROUTE IQ PAAICNG 1 � EIIRTING BUILDING SCOPEI '� (E) WAREHOUSE - Bl11lAING IiDNED SO-07] < j?11 PUBLK ELENiENTAAT ' EXISTING CHARTER SCHOOL � c n e BUIICNC w [Nat M scam v Dl Vehicle Circulation Rus Circulaton — Personal vehicle loading zone B� Bus loading zone EXISTING BUILDING (NOT N SCDPEI -'~ STIEXI NG = auLoING - ENOT IN — SDDPE) (w) sth s� ID3 3A I VISTA HERITAGE CHARTER SCHOOL EXPANSION I TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS PROPOSED ROUTE \ \ \ \ (E) BOLLARDS. TYP. DROP OFF REF:BIA5.1 SITE PLAN -TURN AROUND ANALYSIS 1"=20'-0" 1 v 72'-2' J City Council 26 — 248 1/16/2024 �III!'iiiliilliiill II IIII I I Il I diillllllllllllllllllll��iin��, 1 THANK Y City Council Vista Charter Public Schools Sunshine Ordinance Meeting Notes -- March 6, 2023 Q: Where will the outside play area be located? A Where the parking lot directly behind the building is currently located. Q: How big is the play area? A: Unsure. We will check and follow-up. Q: Will the play area affect the flow of traffic? A: No plans to impact the existing traffic flows. The Fairview Avenue curb cut will be used by the new office tenant. Q: Where is the playground located on the master site plan? A: Playground area was pointed out on the map. Q: Why is the zoning being changed? A: To allow an office use that is 100 percent office - the current M-1 zoning does not allow a building that is 100 percent office. Also, we are proposing to amend the operational standards and allow an outdoor play area (currently prohibited). Q: What fencing is proposed? A: Fencing to secure the outdoor play area and outdoor learning area will be installed (fencing identified on the site p(an) Q: Concerns with trucks (up to 50 feet in length) being able to turn west to Fairview Street with the change in circulation A: Will look at ways to accommodate truck traffic City Council 26 — 250 1/16/2024 Q: Concerns that the project may impact and/or violate existing CC&R's A: Both the school and the association will separately look at the CC&Rs for any impacts to the document. Q: Will fencing separate the children's play area from vehicular traffic? A: Yes Q: Concerns with the safety of students and existing pinch points at the south and west ends of the parking lot adjacent to the school and industrial building. A: Traffic engineer to review pinch points and identify potential solutions Q: Project needs to consider potential parking violations by Templo Calvario A: Will work with the City to identify any potential violations of existing entitlements Q: What is the timing of the project? A: School would like to have all improvements completed by beginning of 2024 school year Q: Why outside playground now when original approval had indoor play area only? A: Will provide response at Eater date City Council 26 — 251 1/16/2024 THE FREGOSO GROUP May 31, 2023 Ms. Fernanda Arias Santa Ana Planning Division 20 Civic Center Plaza, M-20 Santa Ana, CA. 92702 RE: Submittal of May 15, 2023, Second Sunshine Meeting documents — Vista Charter Public Schools Dear Ms. Arias, On behalf of Vista Charter Public Schools and Red Hook Capital Partners, please find the enclosed materials required by the Sunshine Ordinance for the May 15, 2023 second Sunshine Meeting for the Vista Charter Public Schools proposed zone change (amendment application) and amendments to the SD-82 zoning district at 601 N. Fairview Street. The following material are provided for your use: 1. Community meeting notice (English and Spanish) 2. List of property owners within 1000 feet of the site 3. List of occupants within 1000 feet of the site 4. The 1000-foot notification radius map S. Proof of publication in the local newspaper 6. Meeting agenda 7. Sign -in sheet 8. Copy of the PowerPoint presentation for the meeting 9. Meeting minutes/Questions and answers This letter confirms, under penalty of perjury, that the required meeting, notifications and materials were prepared and distributed in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance of the City of Santa Ana. Respectfully, Vince Fregoso The Fregoso Group On behalf of Vista Charter Public Schools City Council 26 — 252 1/16/2024 SUNSHINE ORDINANCE COMMUNITY MEETING NOTICE You are invited to attend a Community Meeting for the project described below: Subject: Amend the zoning of the northwest parcel from Industrial to Specific Development No. 82 (SD-82) to be consistent with the majority of the parcel and to amend the Operational Standards of the SD-82 zoning to allow outdoor recreation areas. Spanish language translators will be available during the meeting. Location: 2609 West Fifth Street (Vista Heritage Bay 2 Cafeteria) Meeting Date: Monday, May 25, 2023 Meeting Time: 6:30 pm to 7:30 pm Meeting Location: Vista Heritage Bay 3 Cafeteria 2609 West Fifth Street Notification Area: Project Site: Meeting Site: For more Information, contact Vince Fregoso at 714-904-4506 or Ingrid Canedo at 818-309-3664 City Council 26 — 253 1/16/2024 SUNSHINE ORDINANCE AVISO DE REUNION COMUNITARIA Esta invitado a asistir a una reunion comunitaria para del proyecto descrito a continuacion: Proposito. Modificar la zonificacion industrial de la propiedad ubicada en la parte noroeste de la escuela de la zona industrial a desarrollo especifico No. 82 (SD-82) para que coincida con la mayor parte del terreno junto, que viene siendo la escueia. La modificacion tambidn agregara terminos generales a la zona SD-82 para incluir actividades fisicas al afire fibre. Traductores en lenguaje espanol estarAn presentes durante la reunion. Ubicaclon: 2609 West Fifth Street (la cafeteria de bay 2 de Vista Heritage School) Fecha de reunion: Lunes, 15 de Mayo de 2023 Hora de reunion: 6:30 p. m. a 7:30 p. m. Lugar de reunion: La cafeteria de bay 3 de Vista Heritage School 2609 West Fifth Street Area de Notificacioi Sitio de Projecto: Sito de Reunion: Para mcis informacion, comuniquese con Vince Fregoso al 714-904-4506 o Ingrid Canedo al 818-309-3664 City Council 26 — 254 1/16/2024 #1 004-152-01 IUS MAPS 4 LESS ARMANDO & JOSEFINA E ESPARZA r'LA?0411;G .2222 W 107H ST W mi-radiusmaos4less.com 1 (909) 997-9357 SANTA ANA CA 92703 ORDER NO: 2023-26 DATE: 02/09/2023 #3 004-152-10 HOLDINGS SORENTO 2209 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #6 004-152-13 ESTHER AVALOS MAFFEY 2225 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #9 004-153-02 ESTELA LORA GUERRERO 2230 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #12 004-153-05 REBECCA P CAMPOS 2218W9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #15 004-153-08 LONG TRAN 2206 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #18 004-153-11 RODOLFO & STELLA LICERIO 2141 W CIVIC CENTER DR SANTA ANA CA 92703 #21 004-153-14 IGNACIO D GONZALES 2205 CIVIC CENTER DR WEST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #24 004-153-18 MASTAN INC 811 N FAIRVIEW ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #27 004-183-02 CARLOS H PEREGRINA 2130 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #4 0D4-152-11 HOLLY NHIHA LE 2217 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #7 004-152-14 CANDIDA G OLIVAS 2229 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #10 004-153-03 STEVEN HUU & TAMMY CHANH NGUYEN 6945 ALTAIR CT CORONA CA 92880 #13 004-153-06 TEODULO MONTIELADAME 2214 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #16 004-153-09 DANIEL PEREZ & JILL E AVILA 2202 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #19 004-153-12 NGOC TRAN 2145 W CIVIC CENTER DR SANTA ANA CA 92703 #22 004-153-16 SOUTHLAND HOMES REAL ESTATE & INVESTMENT 10448 SALINAS RIVER CIR FOUNTAIN VALLEY CA 92708 #25 004-153-20 EDELIRA MORENO 2209 W CIVIC CENTER DR SANTA ANA CA 92703 #28 004-183-03 VICTORIA FLORES RODRIGUEZ 2126 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #2 004-152-09 HOLDINGS SORENTO 2209 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #5 004-152-12 ERIC R LOPEZ 2221 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #8 004-153-01 WINSTON HUYNH 2234 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #11 004-153-04 DIOSFORO & MARIA E SERNA 2222 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #14 004-153-07 ANTONIO RODRIGUEZ TRUJILLO 2210 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #17 004-153-10 RICARDO H & ANA L HARO 2137 CIVIC CENTER DR WEST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #20 004-153-13 ANDY 0 MUNOZ 2019 VALENCIA ST SANTA ANA CA 92706 #23 004-153-17 JUAN D & CAROLYN E MEDRANO 2221 W CIVIC CENTER DR SANTA ANA CA 92703 #26 004-183-01 SERGIO MORENO JUAREZ 2134 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #29 004-183-15 ANDREW JONATHAN & DIANA ROSE MUNOZ 2129 W CIVIC CENTER DR SANTA ANA CA 92703 City Council 26 — 255 1/16/2024 #30 #32 004-183-16 004-183-17 DAVID NGUYEN MICHAEL B MATTINGLEY 3361 RURAL CIR 4006 CALLE MARLENA CORONA CA 92882 SAN CLEMENTE CA 92672 #33 #34 004-183-24 007-021-02 REYNALDO & ZOILA VERGARA TURN HOANG NGUYEN 2125 CIVIC CTR 7662 LEHIEN PL SANTA ANA CA 92703 WESTMINSTER CA 92683 #36 #37 007-021-04 007-021-05 NESTOR ALEJANDRES GEORGE 8 COBARRUVIA 2317 6TH ST 2309 6TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #39 #40 007-021-08 007-021-10 JOSE & YOLANDA ZAVALA TUNG DINH PHAN 2339 6TH ST 14822 ALCESTER ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 WESTMINSTER CA 92683 #42 #43 007-022-01 007-022-04 FORTH E SOUL LLC HOMES MICHAEL A MADZOEFF 1616 FLOWER AVE 211 MARIGOLD AVE FULLERTON CA 92833 CORONA DEL MAR CA 92625 #45 #46 007-022-06 007-022-07 MICHAEL A MADZOEFF MICHAEL A MADZOEFF 211 MARIGOLD AVE 211 MARIGOLD AVE CORONA DEL MAR CA 92625 CORONA DEL MAR CA 92625 #48 #49 007-022-13 007-022-16 INDELISA QUINTERO MICHAEL A MADZOEFF 2424 6TH ST 211 MARIGOLD AVE SANTA ANA CA 92703 CORONA DEL MAR CA 92625 #51 #52 007-022-19 007-022-20 JAKE J YOON FRANCISCO JAVIER PERAZA 23015TH ST 2414 6TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #54 #55 007-022-23 007-022-24 AVA ENTERPRISES MICHAELA MADZOEFF 2831 1ST ST 211 MARIGOLD AVE SANTA ANA CA 92703 CORONA DEL MAR CA 92625 #57 #58 007-022-26 007-022-29 ORANGE COUNTY TRANSIT RICK D KAGASOFF PO BOX 14184 2023 HELIOTROPE ORANGE CA 92863 SANTA ANA CA 92706 #32 004-183-22 HERIBERTO & MARIA MERCADO 2121 CIVIC CENTER DR SANTA ANA CA 92703 #35 007-021-03 ARTURO F DURAZO 2321 6TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #38 007-021-06 EUGENEJONES 12921 ROSALIND DR SANTA ANA CA 92705 #41 007-021-14 JPACIFIC INTERNATIONAL 13043 BACH WAY CERRITOS CA 90703 TR6TH SA GARDEN #44 007-022-05 MICHAEL A MADZOEFF 211 MARIGOLD AVE CORONA DEL MAR CA 92625 #47 007-022-09 JAKE J YOON 2301 5TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #50 007-022-17 MICHAEL A MADZOEFF 211 MARIGOLD AVE CORONA DEL MAR CA 92625 #53 007-022-21 LA RIVA ROSIE V DE 2418 6TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #56 007-022-25 MICHAEL A MADZOEFF 211 MARIGOLD AVE CORONA DEL MAR CA 92625 #59 007-022-30 JAKE 1 YOON 23015TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 City Council 26 — 256 1/16/2024 #60 #61 #62 007-022-31 007-022-32 007-022-33 MICHAEL A MAD ZOEFF JAKE J YOON MICHAEL A MAD ZOEFF 211 MARIGOLD AVE 2301 5TH ST 211 MARIGOLD AVE CORONA DEL MAR CA 92625 SANTA ANA CA 92703 CORONA DEL MAR CA 92625 #63 #64 #65 007-110-01 007-120-24 007-120-25 KEVIN OVERGAAUW RICK D KAGASOFF T R KIRWAN 2308 5TH ST 2023 HELIOTROPE 5133 LORELEI AVE SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92706 LAKEWOOD CA 90712 #66 #67 #68 007-120-26 007-120-27 007-120-28 JOSE LUIS CHOCOTECO CHARLES A HATFIELD CHUNG-YEN & YEN -LING HHANG 1002 ROSITA ST 25852 PECOS RD 19819 MT SCHELIN CIR SANTA ANA CA 92703 LAGUNA HILLS CA 92653 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CA 92708 #69 #70 #71 007-120-43 007-120-44 007-120-46 KELLY E CHAPMAN KELLY E CHAPMAN DION C CHAPMAN 24242 SANTA CLARA AVE 11 24242 SANTA CLARA AVE 11 30442 BENECIA DANA POINT CA 92629 DANA POINT CA 92629 LAGUNA NIGUEL CA 92677 #72 #73 #74 007-120-48 007-121-01 007-121-02 ORANGE COUNTY TRANSIT RICK D KAGASOFF FIFTH STREET CAPITAL WEST P O BOX 3005 2023 HELIOTROPE 55 FANLIGHT GARDEN GROVE CA 92840 SANTA ANA CA 92705 IRVINE CA 92620 #75 #76 #77 007-121-03 007-121-04 007-121-05 MARANATHA REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS LLC HBBF RICK D KAGASOFF 411 SULLIVAN ST 410 NANTUCKET PL 2023 HELIOTROPE DR SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92706 #78 #79 #80 007-121-06 007-121-07 007-121-08 RICK D KAGASOFF CYMC LLC CYMC LLC 2023 HELIOTROPE 321 SULLIVAN ST 301 SULLIVAN ST SANTA ANA CA 92705 SANTA ANA CA SANTA ANA CA 92703 #81 #82 #83 007-121-09 007-121-10 007-141-04 CYMC LLC RICK D KAGASOFF CHRIS R SOLDAN 2430 CAPE COD WAY 2023 HELIOTROPE DR 7243 CAMBRIA CIR SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92706 ORANGE CA 92869 #84 #85 #86 007-141-11 007-141-24 007-141-26 SPACE PROPERTIES TWO LLC EXTRA PHUC VIET TRAN RICK D KAGASOFF 2795 COTTONWOOD PKWY #400 126 MAXINE ST 2023 HELIOTROPE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84121 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92706 #87 #88 #89 007-141-29 007-141-31 007-141-35 W& M PROPERTIES W& M PROPERTIES F C B PROPERTIES 1479 MUSTANG AVE 1479 MUSTANG AVE 6138 JAMESALAN ST ORANGE CA 92869 ORANGE CA 92869 CYPRESS CA 90630 City Council 26 — 257 1/16/2024 #90 #91 #92 007-141-42 007-141-66 007-141-67 CHRIS R SOLDAN MAS LLC YIA ANA MINI STORAGE SANTA 7243 CAMBRIA CIR 16741 GLENHAVEN LN 5901 ENCINA RD C-5 ORANGE CA 92869 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 GOLETA CA 93117 #93 #94 #95 007-141-76 007-141-77 007-242-01 CHRIS R SOLDAN W & M PROPERTIES GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF ORANGE COUNTY 7243 CAMBRIA CIR 1479 MUSTANG AVE CA ORANGE CA 92869 ORANGE CA 92869 410 FAIRVIEW ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #96 #97 #98 D07-351-01 007-351-02 007-351-03 MOHAMMAD ARAFEEN QUERASHI MOHAMMAD ARAFEEN QUERASHI MARIA FLORES 6633 PASEO FIESTA DR 6633 PASEO FIESTA DR 2230 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE WEST ANAHEIM HILLS CA 92703 ANAHEIM HILLS CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92701 #99 #100 #101 007-351-04 007-351-05 007-351-06 JOHN A MONREAL KENNY QUYEN LIEU EZEQUIEL SEGURA 2226 CIVIC CENTER DR WEST 2222 CIVIC CENTER DR 2218 CIVIC CENTER DR SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #102 #103 #104 007-351-07 007-351-08 007-351-09 RODRIGO SANTIAGO PACHECO REYMUNDO & EVA M DOMINGUEZ JOSE PATINO 2214 CIVIC CENTER DR 2210 CIVIC CENTER DR WEST 2206 CIVIC CENTER DR SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #105 #106 #107 007-351-10 007-351-11 007-351-14 NHUT NGOC NGUYEN RAYMOND M ZAMORA NOE & MIREYA VARGAS 801 COURTNEY 2148 CIVIC CENTER DR WEST 2136 CIVIC CENTER DR FULLERTON CA 92833 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #108 #109 #110 007-351-15 007-351-16 007-351-19 ANDRES FLORES VINA PROPERTIES FAUSTO MACHADO 2132 CIVIC CTR 7241 WESTMINSTER BLVD 2116 CIVIC CENTER DR WEST SANTA ANA CA 92703 WESTMINSTER CA 92683 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #111 #112 #113 007-351-24 007-351-26 007-351-28 VENA & JULIE F SCANLAN EPIFANIO GONZALEZ ALEJANDRO GAVINA 2144 CIVIC CENTER DR 2140 CIVIC DR 2124 CIVIC CENTER DR SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #114 #115 #116 007-351-30 007-351-32 007-352-02 CONSTANTINO SALINAS RODRIGUEZ JOSE D ORTIZ CHRISTOPHER A OVIEDO 2120 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE WEST 2112 CIVIC CENTER DR 2105 7TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #117 #118 #119 007-352-03 007-352-04 007-352-05 ESTEVAN N RAMIREZ ROGELIO SILVA LUIS MELCHOR PENALOZA 2110 7TH ST 2113 7TH ST 2117 7TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 City Council 26 — 258 1/16/2024 #120 #121 #122 007-352-06 007-352-07 007-352-08 JARELY MELCHOR HUAN NGUYEN RAUL LOPEZ 21217TH ST 2125 7TH ST 2129 7TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #123 #124 #125 007-352-09 007-352-10 007-352-11 YANLING SUN JAIME MUNOZ SIMONA M PERALES 2133 7TH ST 1730 WASHINGTON 22017TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92706 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #126 #127 #128 007-352-12 007-352-13 007-352-14 ROMAN ANTHONY REYNA JOANNA L PETERSON HECTOR MELENDEZ 2205 7TH ST 2533 HESPERIAN ST 2213 7TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92706 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #129 #130 #131 007-352-15 007-352-16 007-352-17 SERGIO GASCA MANRIQUEZ MACXIMILLIANO P CEBALLOS ELVA MENDEZ 2217 7TH ST 2221 17TH ST 2225 7TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #132 #133 #134 007-352-18 007-352-19 007-352-20 FERNANDO RODRIGUEZ CHAVEZ VICTOR MANUEL PEREZ JOSE V VALDEZ 2229 7TH ST 2233 7TH ST 2237 7TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #135 #136 #137 007-352-23 007-352-24 007-352-25 THACH JADE HOANG CHUONG MAI JUAN DIAZ 2242 7TH ST 2238 7TH ST 2234 7TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #138 #139 #140 007-352-26 007-352-27 007-352-28 ROBERT ANTHONY FLORES CATHY L BUENDIA RACHEL CAMACHO 2230 7TH ST 2226 7TH ST 1242 CEDAR SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92707 #141 #142 #143 007-352-29 007-352-30 007-352-31 CATALINA & JOSE A ANDRADE JOHNNY C NGUYEN ESTHER C GONZALEZ 2218 7TH ST 2214 7TH ST 2210 7TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #144 #145 #146 007-352-32 007-352-33 007-352-34 KHIET DO MARGARITA CORTES LILIANA FAUSTO 2206 7TH ST 2202 7TH ST 2138 7TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #147 #148 #149 007-352-35 007-352-36 007-352-37 BRAD & WENDY PEIKERT BRAD & WENDY PEIKERT ENRIQUE PENA 2130 7TH 5T 2130 7TH ST 2126 7TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 City Council 26 — 259 1/16/2024 #150 #151 #152 007-352-38 007-352-39 007-352-40 ISRAEL VERGARA ALVAREZ ISRAEL & ELEAZER MONTES VERGARA AGUSTIN & MARICELA ANAYA 2122 7TH ST 2118 7TH ST 2114 7TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #153 007-352-41 ESTEVAN N RAMIREZ 2110 7TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #156 198-151-35 KIM EAR KUONG 12636 CASA BONITA PL VICTORVILLE CA 92392 #159 405-211-03 SCHOOL SANTA ANA UNIFIEDDISTRICT 1601 CHESTNUT AVE SANTA ANA CA 92701 #162 405-211-08 ROSA MENDIVIL 1424 LOWELLST SANTA ANA CA 92706 #165 405-211-11 LUIS B & MARIA D L RODRIGUEZ 2520 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #168 405-211-14 DANH C NGUYEN 2606 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #171 405-211-17 ALFREDA & PABLO JUAREZ 2618 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #174 405-211-20 BERTRAM F RUDOLPH P 0 BOX 2302 CARMEL CA 93921 #177 405-211-36 SCHOOL SANTA ANA UNIFIEDDISTRICT 1405 FRENCH ST SANTA ANA CA 92701 #154 007-352-42 EDNA L MEJIA 1239 BAKER ST SANTA ANA CA 92707 #157 405-211-01 SCHOOL SANTA ANA UNIFIEDDISTRICT 1405 FRENCH ST SANTA ANA CA 92701 #160 405-211-04 SCHOOL SANTA ANA UNIFIEDDISTRICT 1405 FRENCH ST SANTA ANA CA 92701 #163 405-211-09 THAI JENNIFER LOAN 9350 BOLSA AVE SPC 58 WESTMINSTER CA 92683 #166 405-211-12 JUAN JUAREZ HERNANDEZ 2528 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #169 405-211-15 MAIRA & NOEL ISRAEL AYALA 1718 TURQUOISE DR CORONA CA 92882 #172 405-211-18 NGUYEN VIET CAO 16576 MTTODD ST FOUNTAIN VALLEY CA 92708 #175 405-211-22 TAI VAN LAM 11460 VIA PLAYA CORTES WAY SAN DIEGO CA 92124 #178 405-212-01 MY TRAN DUE LUU 9509 PRICHARD ST BELLFLOWER CA 90706 #155 007-352-46 MOHAMMAD ARAFEEN QUERASHI 6633 PASEO FIESTA DR ANAHEIM HILLS CA 92703 #158 405-211-02 SCHOOL SANTA ANA UNIFIEDDISTRICT 1405 FRENCH ST SANTA ANA CA 92701 #161 405-211-07 GERALD L HIGDON 12692 BONITA HEIGHTS DR SANTA ANA CA 92705 #164 405-211-10 ORVILLE N ROSEBEARY 16461 VENUS DR WESTMINSTER CA 92683 #167 405-211-13 FELIX CIBRIAN 2534 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #170 405-211-16 IRMA OROZCO 11858 MAYFLOWER CIR FOUNTAIN VALLEY CA 92708 #173 405-211-19 RODOLFO MUNOZ 2624 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #176 405-211-23 SOUTHLAND HOMES REAL 10448 SALINAS RIVER CI FOUNTAIN VALLEY CA 92708 #179 405-212-02 GUADALUPE OLEA 933 FAIR WAY SANTA ANA CA 92703 City Council 26 — 260 1/16/2024 #180 #181 #182 405-212-09 405-212-10 405-212-11 MARCELINO & EUSTOLIA JUAREZ TENTH DO MANUEL GARCIA RIZO 924 MARENGO PL 422 MAXINE ST 2607 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92704 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #183 405-213-01 DENISE LE 1002 FAIRVIEW ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #186 405-213-05 CUAUHTEMOC FERNANDEZ 25219TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #189 405-213-14 OF SANTA ANA CITY 20 CIVIC CENTER PLAZA M-30 SANTA ANA CA 92701 #192 405-221-03 SCHOOL SANTA ANA UNIFIEDDIST OF ORANGE 1405 FRENCH ST SANTA ANA CA 92701 #195 405-241-01 PARCEL HOLD #198 405-241-03 KITCHENS QOZB FAIRVIEW 402 OCEAN VIEW AVE ENCI N ITAS CA 92024 #201 939-45-057 CALVARIO TEMPLO 25015TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #204 939-45-059 CALVARIO TEMPLO 25015TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #207 939-45-060 2609 W 5TH STREET 2900 TEMPLE ST LOS ANGELES CA 90026 #184 405-213-02 DENISE LE 1002 FAIRVIEW ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #187 405-213-06 RAYMOND CC YANG 2628 DEEGAN OR SANTA ANA CA 92704 #190 405-221-01 SCHOOL SANTA ANA UNIFIEDDIST OF ORANGE 1405 FRENCH ST SANTA ANA CA 92701 #193 405-221-05 ORANGE COUNTY TRANSIT P O BOX 3005 GARDEN GROVE CA 92840 #196 405-242-01 PARCEL HOLD #199 405-241-04 2609 W 5TH STREET 2900 TEMPLE ST LOS ANGELES CA 90026 #202 939-45-059 CALVARIO TEMPLO 25015TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #205 939-45-059 CALVARIO TEMPLO 2501 5TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #208 939-45-061 2609 W 5TH STREET 2900 TEMPLE ST LOS ANGELES CA 90026 #185 405-213-04 JORGE G FRUTOS 2517 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #188 405-213-07 DIANA MELINA VALENZUELA PEREZ 927 MARENGO PL SANTA ANA CA 92703 #191 405-221-02 SCHOOL SANTA ANA UNIFIEDDIST OF ORANGE 1405 FRENCH ST SANTA ANA CA 92701 #194 405-221-07 SCHOOL SANTA ANA UNIFIEDDIST OF ORANGE 1405 FRENCH ST SANTA ANA CA 92701 #197 405-241-02 ORANGE COUNTY TRANSIT P 0 BOX 3005 GARDEN GROVE CA 92840 #200 939-45-057 CALVARIO TEMPLO 25015TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #203 939-45-058 CALVARIO TEMPLO 25015TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #206 939-45-060 2609 W 5TH STREET 2900 TEMPLE ST LOS ANGELES CA 90026 #209 939-45-061 2609 W 5TH STREET 2900 TEMPLE ST LOS ANGELES CA 90026 City Council 26 — 261 1/16/2024 #210 #211 #212 939-45-062 939-45-062 939-45-063 2609 W 5TH STREET 2609 W 5TH STREET GENERATION TILE & MARBLE NEW 2900 TEMPLE ST 2900 TEMPLE ST 563 FAIRVIEW ST LOS ANGELES CA 90026 LOS ANGELES CA 90026 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #213 #214 #215 939-45-063 939-45-064 939-45-064 GENERATION TILE & MARBLE NEW WILBERT MARRUFO WILBERT MARRUFO 563 FAIRVIEW ST 559 FAIRVIEW ST 559 FAIRVIEW ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #216 #217 #218 939-45-065 939-45-065 939-45-066 WILBERT MARRUFO WILBERT MARRUFO DHANANIAYA N MHASKAR 555 FAIRVIEW ST 555 FAIRVIEW ST 3972 BARRANCA PKWY J158 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 IRVINE CA 92606 #219 #220 #221 939-45-066 939-45-067 939-45-067 DHANANIAYA N MHASKAR SCOTTY LEE SCOTTY LEE 3972 BARRANCA PKWY J158 13791 DIEPPE CIR 13791 DIEPPE CIR IRVINE CA 92606 GARDEN GROVE CA 92843 GARDEN GROVE CA 92843 #222 #223 #224 939-45-068 939-45-068 939-45-069 CURTIS & BETTY TOM CURTIS & BETTY TOM EN HONG & JANG LAN SHEN 24982 LUNA BONITA DR 24982 LUNA BONITA DR 3314 MEADOWRIDGE LAGUNA HILLS CA 92653 LAGUNA HILLS CA 92653 ORANGE CA 92867 #225 #226 #227 939-45-069 939-45-070 939-45-070 EN HONG & JANG LAN SHEN EDWARD DONLEY EDWARD DONLEY 3314 MEADOWRIDGE 19432 CLOVER 19432 CLOVER ORANGE CA 92867 SANTA ANA CA 92705 SANTA ANA CA 92705 #228 #229 #230 939-45-071 939-45-071 939-45-072 BARRY J UNCK BARRY J EINCK ROBERT C HUNT 14681 DAN BERRY CIR 14681 DANBERRY CIR 28371 MODJESKA CANYON RD TUSTIN CA 92780 TUSTIN CA 92780 MODJESKA CA 92676 #231 #232 #233 939-45-072 939-45-073 939-45-073 ROBERT C HUNT TAI TAN PHAM TAI TAN PHAM 28371 MODJESKA CANYON RD 302 TULIP TREE AVE 302 TULIP TREE AVE MODJESKA CA 92676 ORANGE CA 92865 ORANGE CA 92865 #234 939-45-074 HANH BICH HOANG 16572 GRAHAM PL HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 #235 939-45-074 HANH BICH HOANG 16572 GRAHAM PL HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 City Council 26 — 262 1/16/2024 #1 #2 #3 004-152-01 004-152-09 004-152-10 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2222 W 10TH ST 2209 W 9TH ST 2213 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #4 #5 #6 004-152-11 004-152-12 004-152-13 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2217 W 9TH ST 2221 W 9TH ST 2225 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #7 #8 #9 004-152-14 004-153-01 004-153-02 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2229 W 9TH ST 2234 W 9TH ST 2230 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #10 #11 #12 004-153-03 004-153-04 004-153-05 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2226 W 9TH ST 2222 W 9TH ST 2218 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #13 #14 #15 004-153-06 004-153-07 004-153-08 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2214 W 9TH ST 2210 W 9TH ST 2206 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #16 #17 #18 004-153-09 004-153-10 004-153-11 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2202 W 9TH ST 2137 W CIVIC CENTER DR 2141 W CIVIC CENTER DR SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #19 #20 #21 004-153-12 004-153-13 004-153-14 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2145 W CIVIC CENTER DR 2201 W CIVIC CENTER DR 2205 W CIVIC CENTER DR SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #22 #23 #24 004453-16 004-153-17 004-153-18 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2217 W CIVIC CENTER DR 2221 W CIVIC CENTER OR 809 N FAIRVIEW ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #24 #24 #24 004-153-18 004-153-18 004-153-18 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 811 N FAIRVIEW ST 813 N FAIRVIEW ST 815 N FAIRVIEW ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #25 #26 #27 004-153-20 004-183-01 004-183-02 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2209 W CIVIC CENTER DR 2134 W 9TH ST 2130 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 City Council 26 — 263 1/16/2024 #28 #29 #30 004-183-03 004-183-15 004-183-16 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2126 W 9TH ST 2129 W CIVIC CENTER DR 2133 W CIVIC CENTER DR SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #31 #32 #33 004-183-17 004-183-22 004-183-24 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2119 W CIVIC CENTER DR 2121 W CIVIC CENTER DR 2125 W CIVIC CENTER DR SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #34 #35 #36 007-021-02 007-021-03 007-021-04 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2325 W 6TH ST 2321 W 6TH ST 2317 W 6TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #37 #38 #39 007-021-05 007-021-06 007-021-08 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2309 W 6TH ST 2307 W 6TH ST 2339 W 6TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #40 #41 #42 007-021-10 007-021-14 007-022-01 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2331 W 6TH ST 2333 W 6TH ST 2430 W 6TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #43 #44 #45 007-022-04 007-022-05 007-022-06 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2334 W 6TH ST 2328 W 6TH ST 2324 W 6TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #46 #47 #48 007-022-07 007-022-09 007-022-13 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2328 W 6TH ST 2304 W 6TH ST 2424 W 6TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #49 #50 #51 007-022-16 007-022-17 007-022-19 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2325 W 5TH ST 2317 W 5TH ST 2310 W 6TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #52 #53 #54 007-022-20 0D7-022-21 007-022-23 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2414 W 6TH ST 2418 W 6TH ST 2338 W 6TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #55 #56 #57 007-022-24 007-022-25 007-022-26 NO CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT NO CURRENT OCCUPANT 2329 W 5TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 City Council 26 — 264 1/16/2024 #58 #59 #60 007-022-29 007-022-30 007-022-31 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2415 W 5TH ST 2301 W STH ST 2314 W 6TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #61 #62 #63 007-022-32 007-022-33 007-110-01 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2301 W 5TH ST 2315 W 5TH ST 2308 W STH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #64 #65 #66 007-120-24 007-120-25 007-120-26 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2400 W STH ST 2401 CAPE COD WAY Al2 2350 W STH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #67 #68 #69 007-120-27 007-120-28 007-120-43 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2351 CAPE COD WAY 2330 W STH ST 2341 CAPE COD WAY SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #70 #71 #72 007-120-44 007-120-46 007-120-48 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT NO CURRENT OCCUPANT 2331 CAPE COD WAY 2321 CAPE COD WAY SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #73 #74 #75 007-121-01 007-121-02 007-221-03 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2430 W STH ST 2410 W 5TH ST 411 N SULLIVAN ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #76 #77 #78 007-121-04 007-121-05 007-121-06 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 410 NANTUCKET PL 401 N SULLIVAN ST 400 NANTUCKET PL SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #79 #80 #81 007-121-07 0D7-121-08 007-121-09 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 321 N SULLIVAN ST 301 N SULLIVAN ST 2430 CAPE COD WAY SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #82 #83 #84 007-121-10 007-141-04 007-141-11 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2420 CAPE COD WAY 302 N SULLIVAN ST 2602 W STH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #85 #86 #87 007-141-24 007-141-26 007-141-29 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2520 W 5TH ST 2518 W STH ST 408 N SULLIVAN ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 City Council 26 — 265 1/16/2024 #88 #89 #90 007-141-31 007-141-35 007-141-42 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 406 N SULLIVAN ST 412 N SULLIVAN ST 402 N SULLIVAN ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #91 #92 #93 007-141-66 007-141-67 007-141-76 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 419 N FAIRVIEW ST 401 N FAIRVIEW ST 308 N SULLIVAN ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #94 #95 #96 007-141-77 007-142-01 007-351-01 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 404 N SULLIVAN ST 404 N FAIRVIEW ST 711 N FAIRVIEW ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #97 #98 ##99 007-351-02 007-351-03 007-351-04 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 711 N FAIRVIEW ST 2230 W CIVIC CENTER DR 2226 W CIVIC CENTER OR SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #100 #101 #102 007-351-05 007-351-06 007-351-07 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2222 W CIVIC CENTER DR 2218 W CIVIC CENTER DR 2214 W CIVIC CENTER DR SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #103 #104 #105 007-351-08 007-351-09 007-3S1-10 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2210 W CIVIC CENTER DR 2206 W CIVIC CENTER DR 2202 W CIVIC CENTER DR SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #106 #107 #108 007-351-11 007-351-14 007-351-15 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2148 W CIVIC CENTER DR 2136 W CIVIC CENTER DR 2132 W CIVIC CENTER DR SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #109 #110 #111 007-351-16 007-351-19 007-351-24 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2128 W CIVIC CENTER DR 2116 W CIVIC CENTER DR 2144 W CIVIC CENTER DR SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #112 #113 #114 007-351-26 007-351-28 007-351-30 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2140 W CIVIC CENTER DR 2124 W CIVIC CENTER DR 2120 W CIVIC CENTER DR SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #115 #116 #117 007-351-32 007-352-02 007-352-03 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2112 W CIVIC CENTER DR 2105 W 7TH ST 2109 W 7TN ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 City Council 26 — 266 1/16/2024 #118 #119 #120 007-352-04 007-352-05 007-352-06 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2113 W 7TH ST 2117 W 7TH ST 2121 W 7TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #121 #122 #123 007-352-07 007-352-08 007-352-09 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2125 W 7TH ST 2129 W 7TH ST 2133 W 7TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #124 #125 #126 007-352-10 007-352-11 007-352-12 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2137 W 7TH ST 2201 W 7TH ST 2205 W 7TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #127 #128 #129 007-352-13 007-352-14 007-352-15 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2209 W 7TH ST 2213 W 7TH ST 2217 W 7TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #130 #131 #132 007-3S2-16 007-352-17 007-352-18 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2221 W 7TH ST 2225 W 7TH ST 2229 W 7TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #133 #134 #135 007-352-19 007-352-20 007-352-23 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2233 W 7TH ST 2237 W 7TH ST 2242 W 7TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #136 #137 #138 007-352-24 007-352-25 007-352-26 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2238 W 7TH ST 2234 W 7TH ST 2230 W 7TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #139 #140 #141 007-352-27 007-352-28 007-352-29 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2226 W 7TH ST 2222 W 7TH ST 2218 W 7TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #142 #143 #144 007-352-30 007-352-31 007-352-32 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2214 W 7TH ST 2210 W 7TH ST 2206 W 7TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #145 #146 #147 007-352-33 007-352-34 007-352-35 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2202 W 7TH ST 2138 W 7TH ST 2134 W 7TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 City Council 26 — 267 1/16/2024 #148 #149 #150 007-352-36 007-352-37 007-352-38 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2130 W 7TH ST 2126 W 7TH ST 2122 W 7TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #151 #152 #153 007-352-39 007-352-40 007-352-41 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2118 W 7TH ST 2114 W 7TH ST 2110 W 7TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #154 #155 #156 007-352-42 007-352-46 198-151-35 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT NO CURRENT OCCUPANT 2106 W 7TH ST 711 N FAIRVIEW ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #157 #158 #159 405-211-01 405-211-02 405-211-03 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 730 N FAIRVIEW ST 750 N FAIRVIEW ST 720 N FAIRVIEW ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #160 #161 #162 405-211-04 405-211-07 405-211-08 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 804 N FAIRVIEW ST 2502 W 9TH ST 2506 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #163 #164 #165 405-211-09 405-211-10 405-211-11 CURRENT OCCUPANT NO CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2510 W 9TH ST 2520 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #166 #167 #168 405-211-12 405-211-13 405-211-14 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2526 W 9TH ST 2534 W 9TH ST 2604 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #169 #170 #171 405-211-15 405-211-16 405-211-17 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2608 W 9TH ST 2612 W 9TH ST 2616 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #172 #173 #174 405-211-18 405-211-19 405-211-20 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT NO CURRENT OCCUPANT 2620 W 9TH ST 2624 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #175 #176 #177 405-211-22 405-211-23 405-211-36 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT NO CURRENT OCCUPANT 916 FAIR WAY 920 FAIR WAY SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 City Council 26 — 268 1/16/2024 #178 #179 #180 405-212-01 405-212-02 405-212-09 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2611 W 9TH ST 933 FAIRWAY 924 MARENGO PL SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #181 #182 #183 405-212-10 405-212-11 405-213-01 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2535 W 9TH ST 2605 W 9TH ST 1002 N FAIRVIEW ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #184 #185 #186 405-213-02 405-213-04 405-213-05 NO CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2517 W 9TH ST 2521 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #187 #188 #189 405-213-06 405-213-07 405-213-14 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 923 MARENGO PL 927 MARENGO PL 2507 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #190 #191 #192 405-221-01 405-221-02 405-221-03 NO CURRENT OCCUPANT NO CURRENT OCCUPANT NO CURRENT OCCUPANT #193 #194 #195 405-221-05 405-221-07 405-241-01 NO CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT NO CURRENT OCCUPANT 2701 W 5TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #196 #197 #198 405-241-01 405-241-02 405-241-03 NO CURRENT OCCUPANT NO CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 501 N FAIRVIEW ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #199 #199 #199 405-241-04 405-241-04 405-241-04 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 601 N FAIRVIEW ST 651 N FAIRVIEW ST 633 N FAIRVIEW ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #199 #199 #200 405-241-04 405-241-04 939-45-057 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 643 N FAIRVIEW ST 615 N FAIRVIEW ST 2519 W 5TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #201 #202 #203 939-45-057 939-45-058 939-45-058 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2519 W 5TH 5T 2511 W 5TH ST 2511 W STH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 City Council 26 — 269 1/16/2024 #204 #205 #206 939-45-059 939-45-059 939-45-060 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2501 W 5TH ST 2501 W 5TH ST 2617 W 5TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #207 #208 #209 939-45-060 939-45-061 939-45-061 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2617 W 5TH ST 2609 W 5TH ST 2609 W 5TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #210 #211 #212 939-45-062 93945-062 939-45-063 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2601 W 5TH ST 2601 W 5TH 5T 563 N FAIRVIEW ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #213 #214 #215 939-45-063 939-45-064 939-45-064 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 563 N FAIRVIEW ST 559 N FAIRVIEW ST 559 N FAIRVIEW ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #216 #217 #218 939-45-065 939-45-065 93945-066 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 555 N FAIRVIEW ST 555 N FAIRVIEW ST 551 N FAIRVIEW ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #219 #220 #221 939-45-066 939-45-067 939-45-067 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 551 N FAIRVIEW ST 547 N FAIRVIEW ST 547 N FAIRVIEW ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #222 #223 #224 939-45-068 939-45-068 939-45-069 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 539 N FAIRVIEW ST 539 N FAIRVIEW ST 531 N FAIRVIEW ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #225 #226 #227 939-45-069 939-45-070 939-45-070 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 531 N FAIRVIEW ST 527 N FAIRVIEW ST 527 N FAIRVIEW ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #228 #229 #230 939-45-071 939-45-071 939-45-072 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 523 N FAIRVIEW ST 523 N FAIRVIEW ST 2501 W 5TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #230 #231 #231 939-45-072 939-45-072 939-45-072 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2519 W 5TH ST 519 N FAIRVIEW ST 2609 W 5TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 City Council 26 — 270 1/16/2024 #231 939-45-072 CURRENT OCCUPANT 523 N FAIRVIEW ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #231 939-45-072 CURRENT OCCUPANT 563 N FAIRVIEW ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #234 939-45-074 CURRENT OCCUPANT 511 N FAIRVIEW ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #231 939-45-072 CURRENT OCCUPANT 547 N FAIRVIEW ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #232 939-45-073 CURRENT OCCUPANT 515 N FAIRVIEW ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #235 939-45-074 CURRENT OCCUPANT 511 N FAIRVIEW ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #231 939-45-072 CURRENT OCCUPANT 555 N FAIRVIEW ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #233 939-45-073 CURRENT OCCUPANT 515 N FAIRVIEW ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 City Council 26 — 271 1/16/2024 RADIUS MAP 10009 SUBJECT PROPERTY ADDRESS: 601 N. FAIRVIEW AVE., SANTAANA, CA92703 AP N: 405-241-04 Map Date: 2/9/2023 Graphic Data Source Orange County Geographic Information System Base Parcel Database (Derived from APN Maps) Coordinate System: NAD 1963 StatePlane California V FIPS O405 Feet Datum: North American 1983 Legend 6 P • III /� �E ` IIIIIIIIIIII, Latest equalized assessment rolls obtained from the Orange County Assessor's Office through ParcelQuest, a vendor service on 2/9/2023 /'� 0 250 500 1,D00 N Feet ORDER NO. 2023-26 IUS MAPS 4 LESS PLANNING + ENGINEERIhIG www.radiusmaps4less.com I (9o9) 997.93s7 City Council 26 — 272 1/16/2024 ORANGE COUNTY REPORTER -- SINCE 1921 600 W SANTA ANA BLVD STE 812, SANTA ANA, CA 92701 Telephone (714) 643 2027 1 Fax (714) 542-6541 Ingrid Canedo VISTA HERITAGE GLOBAL ACADEMY 2609 W. 5TH STREET SANTA ANA, CA - 92703 PROOF OF PUBLICATION (2015.5 C.C.P.) State of California ) County of ORANGE ) ss Notice Type: GPN - GOVT PUBLIC NOTICE Ad Description: Vista Sunshine Meeting Notice I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the State of California; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or Interested In the above entitled matter. I am the principal cleric of the printer and publisher of the ORANGE COUNTY REPORTER, a newspaper published In the English language in the city of SANTA ANA, county of ORANGE, and adjudged a newspaper of general circulation as defined by the laws of the State of Callfomla by the Superior Court of the County of ORANGE, State of Celtfomla, under date 0612011922. Case No. 13421. That the notice, of which the annexed Is a printed copy, has been published In each regular and entire Issue of said newspaper and not In any supplement thereof on the following dates, to -Wit: 05/0512023 Executed on: 051OW023 At Los Angeles, Callfamla I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing Is true and correct. OR#: 3698354 This space far fW" stamp only City Council 26 — 273 1/16/2024 AGENDA SUNSHINE ORDINANCE COMMUNITY MEETING NOTICE Monday, May 15, 2023 1. Welcome & Overview: Collin Fetch, Ed.D., Assistant Super intendent, Vista Heritage Global Academies 2. Vista Heritage Global Academies Santa Ana Project Details: Slides 1-5) Team: Collin Fetch, Ed.D., Assistant Super Intendent, Vista Heritage Global Academies • Introduction to the Vista Organization (Slides 1-2) • Why Santa Ana (Slide 3) • Benefits of converting parcel 4 from what it previously was into what it can/will be. (Slide 4) • How does that benefit the community? (Slide 5) 3. Land Use Team: (Slides 6-7) Vince Fergoso, Principal, The Fergoso Group • Project Details (Slide 6) • Current Zone & use (Slide 6) • Proposed Zone Amendments (Slide 6) • Proposed Use (Slide 6) • Requested Application (Slide 6) • Next Steps & Where we are at (Slide 6) • Parking Distribution per CC & R (Slide 7) 4. Architecture Team: (Slides 8-10) Tony Pacheco -Taylor, AIA, tEED®AP, Studio W Architects, • Updated site plan (Slide 8) • Exterior architectural improvements (Slide 8) ■ Ft' of outdoor areas ■ Architectural features • Upgrades from development (Slide 8) ■ Landscaping ■ Pedestrian • Accessibility ■ Aesthetic — Elevations (Slides 9-10) 5. Traffic Team: (Slides 11-12) Robert Uv, Traffic Engineer, Urban Xroads • Changes to pick up and drop off queue (Slide 11) • Changes in routing to pick up and drop off circulation (Slide 12) City Council 26 — 274 1/16/2024 UNSHINE ORDINANCE SIGN IN SHEET Monday, May 15, 2023 NAME I EMAIL PHONE ^ J i D 1 - #2 u1�. 657+ // �a b1 Y � N b. C�►y)�-!3 -�s33 1N t X ' P'laYY Vvti1m 1gH1 h�4 1 Cl H - e2i -- 76 / S - City Counci 26 — 275 1 /16/2024 V vn CL O � O �— V O o 025 t mo v M L cli � City Council 26 — 276 1/ U_ Z. � C CL O N qj tto 4- a LG) M 4-1-1 12 '� C aj M 4, CL 0 to v Q CD U Cn CD N Ln- 0 L O 4-0as o City Council 26 - 277 1 IW V m O O V U N � N O m M R > = -r O O m "5C _ CL N C Q N W O 0 m m O • znv Me ` A4.� - a L � s tl3 � pg c � • as � CL Cg ti v U U iG S a fG JyTY 00 • �, 1/16 02 1 .. City Council �Q6 — 278 ivw,3 ;; z;, Q) G O O :N v —Ne m OL- m CL a� O V C Rf 4-+ .0 •� G' 4 a--+ O m V) Q1 cu C O a--+ • v) C O V N - m E ...► CL ,� m C •E � C U v C C .� O CID i \ C C > to `_� V)G COC taA v O cu C O `O Q. m 1O •� C O •� CU 0 O O v E .4 O N O m U C O V O t pU 2 V) U 'a C O `a � <( U Q- W W C: • • • • • City Council 26 - 281 RS m O O O 0 V) 1 /16/2024 86-284292 City Council 26 — 282 1/16/2024 z W W caC J z w z 0 a LLJ w IL b LL I ?A I LL bLL City Council W H 2 = 0 a (_ . . . . . . ..... I , 26 — 285 1 /16/2024 uI D O W Z w (9 Z Q 2 V w Ln O a O W- a .r i I A7FIY 471117Wd fl) 9N1j Wd0) M 0 U 3i r LLJ y Council 26 - 286 1/16/2024 w H O O W IA O a O cc a w H oOc H LU City C :S'�(�,� aY14, --91 mvd (3113) 1 !, 7 26 - 287 I, - 024 Vista Charter Public School Sunshine Ordinance Meeting No. 2 Meeting Notes — May 15, 2023 Follow Up Meeting — May 23, 2023 Q: How will access be provided for our large trucks? A. We are still reviewing options for meeting the school's needs while maintaining truck access. At the follow up meeting on 5/23, Vista presented a new revised a new circulation plan that demonstrated the neighbor's concerns of how larger vehicles moved through the park. The revised plan will be submitted to the city for further review. Q: Will the plans be revised to provide truck access? A: If changes are made, the plans will be revised and will be resubmitted to the city. The plans have since been revised to demonstrate access for larger commercial vehicles. Q: How can you gate off the alley if there are reciprocal easements? A: A review of the easements does not show specific truck easements between the properties, We have a team continuing to review documents related to easements, and the business park should do the same. This issue has been resolved in the redesign reflected in the latest site plans. Q: The truck issue was raised at the first meeting. Why wasn't it addressed? A: The plans for the site are still evolving, and we couldn't address the truck issue until we finalized the site plan for the school. With this feedback, we will be able to address the issue and will have a separate meeting to review the revised plans. The issue has been since resolved and communicated on 5/23. Q: How big is the old auto building/new office building? A: The building is approximately 5,800 square feet in size. The demolished auto mechanic structure was approximately ±11,000 square ft. City Council 26 — 289 1/16/2024 Q: Is the building one or two stories in height? A: The building is one story in height but does contain a small (1,200 square foot) mezzanine. Q: How many will be working in the building? A: Approximately 10 employees will occupy the building. Q: Parking needs to be reverified as there will not be 70 new parking spaces on the north parcel but more like 15. A: The 64 new spaces referred to are the number of stalls on the north parcel that will now be available for the industrial park to utilize. These spaces were previously exclusive to the former automotive uses. Approximately 44 spaces will be new as they will be where the demolished building was located. Q: What is the maximum size of truck that will be studied? A: We will be looking at turning movements for 50-foot long trucks. Q: The 2019 approved SD prohibited outdoor play areas. Why the changes to allow an outdoor play area now? A: A combination of factors such as typical schools have outdoor play areas, families prefer outdoor areas, an lessons learned from covid are led to the decision to pursue an outdoor play area. Q: Our biggest concern besides truck circulation is we can't find a parking spot. A: The revised site plan will provide additional parking opportunities for the industrial park to use. Q: Will this project move forward if we can't address the truck circulation issue? A: We still intend to find a solution that works for all parties. However, the plan will be to move forward if an acceptable option is not found. City Council 26 — 290 1/16/2024 r 86-284222 Exhibit 9 - Parcel Map in Recording 86-284222 C.1--- `4 \ - 4 t�4 � T j T T _Z Cm r_ N gn Ui Q ;'f1FCTi, 41 � 4. der I W r City ounce — 29 1 1/16/2024 Order: 58602205755 Page 11 of 11 Requested By: NextAce TPXML Login , Printed: 8/19/2022 8:26 AM Doc: 1986-284222 AGREAS 07-02-1986 3. AMENDMENT APPLICATION NO. 2023-04 AND ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. 2023-03 FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 601 NORTH FAIRVIEW STREET LOCATED WITHIN THE LIGHT INDUSTRIAL (M1) ZONING DISTRICT. Project Applicant: Enrique Diaz with Red Hook Capital Partners, LLC (Applicant) on behalf of Vista Heritage Charter Schools (Property Owner) Proposed Project: Applicant is requesting approval of Amendment Application (AA) No. 2023-04 (Zone Change) and Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA) No. 2023-03, to rezone the subject property from Light Industrial (M1) to Specific Development No. 82 (SD-82), expand the boundaries of SD-82 to include the subject property, and to modify SD-82 to allow Administrative Offices as a permitted use and Outdoor Play Areas as a permitted use, ancillary to schools. The requested approvals would accommodate the conversion of an existing 5,837-square-foot industrial building into an administrative office building for Vista Heritage Charter School, and allow an outdoor play area adjacent to the existing school. Environmental Impact: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines, this project is exempt from further review under Section 15301 (Existing Facilities), Class 1 exemption, as it involves negligible or no expansion of an existing or former use. Additionally, the project is also exempt under Section 15183 (Projects Consistent with a Community Plan, General Plan, or Zoning) of the CEQA guidelines. Notice of Exemption No. 2023-40 will be filed for this project. Recommended Action: 1. Recommend that the City Council adopt an Application (Zone Change) No. 2023-04. 2. Recommend that the City Council adopt Ordinance Amendment (ZOA) No. 2023-03. ordinance approving Amendment an ordinance approving Zoning City Council 26 — 292 1/16/2024 Planning and Building Agency Item # 3 City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701 Planning Commission Staff Report December 11, 2023 Topic: AA No. 2023-04 and ZOA No. 2023-03 for Vista Heritage Charter School at 601 North Fairview Street. RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Recommend that the City Council adopt an ordinance approving Amendment Application (Zone Change) No. 2023-04. 2. Recommend that the City Council adopt an ordinance approving Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA) No. 2023-03 as conditioned. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Enrique Diaz with Red Hook Capital Partners, LLC, representing Vista Heritage Charter Schools, is requesting approval of Amendment Application (Zone Change) No. 2023-04 and Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA) No. 2023-03, to rezone 601 North Fairview Street (APN: 405-241-04) and expand the boundaries of Specific Development No. 82 (SD-82) to accommodate the conversion of an existing 5,837-square-foot industrial building into an administrative office building for Vista Charter School. Approval of the amendment application will allow the change for the zoning of the subject property from Light Industrial (M 1) to SD-82. Furthermore, the zoning ordinance amendment will expand the boundaries of SD-82, and allow Administrative Offices as a permitted use on Parcel 4, and Outdoor Play Areas as a permitted use ancillary to schools on Parcel 2. Staff is recommending approval of the requests subject to conditions of approval that will address any potential negative impacts on the neighboring land uses. Moreover, staff is supporting the applicant's request because the project complies with the General Plan goals and policies and with the applicable zoning district's development standards. The proposed project seeks to preserve and improve the character and integrity of existing neighborhoods and districts through the promotion of a clean, safe, and creative environment. City Council 26 — 293 1/16/2024 AA No. 2023-04 and ZOA No. 2023-03 for Vista Heritage Charter School at 601 North Fairview Street December 11, 2023 Page 2 DISCUSSION Project Description The amendment application will allow the rezoning of the subject property from M1 to SD- 82 and help facilitate the conversion of a 5,837-square-foot industrial building into an administrative office that will serve Vista Heritage Charter School. Furthermore, the proposed administrative office will serve as headquarters for Vista Heritage Charter School that will oversee a total of six charter schools and it will employ a total of ten individuals that are currently employed at different Vista Heritage Charter Schools. The SD-82 boundaries would be expanded to include the subject property (601 N. Fairview Street or Parcel 4 as illustrated on Exhibit 9), which is approximately 39,437 square feet and located north of the existing SD-82 zoning district, and adjacent to Fairview Street and the Pacific Electric right-of-way (ROW). As part of the overall scope of work, the applicant also proposes various site improvements at the subject site on Parcel 4, including improved landscape in the parking lot; a fagade remodel to the existing 5,837-square-foot industrial building that is proposed to be converted into an office; construction of a new 2,297-square-foot garden; and new gates to enclose the garden. The new proposed garden will be located in the rear of the existing industrial building to be converted into an administrative office within a gated area and it will serve the Vista Heritage Charter School administrative office employees. Additionally, the building improvements for the converted office building will include fagade modifications to create new glass windows and doors; removal of the garage doors; and the creation of new offices, conference rooms, reception area, storage rooms, and an employee breakroom. Furthermore, the scope of work includes improvements at the Vista Heritage Charter School location (2501 W. Fifth Street or Parcel 2 as illustrated on Exhibit 9) for a new outdoor play area that totals 12,012 square feet and gates to enclose the play area. The existing indoor gym and office spaces will remain for indoor recreation and physical education for the students and administrative purposes, without any proposed changes. The outdoor play area will be located directly adjacent to Vista Heritage Charter School on the north side of the building and will serve as a play area for the school's students during the school's regular business hours. Lastly, the site improvements include a metal wire fence that will be installed by Orange County Transit Authority (OCTA) along north property line adjacent to the OC Street Car tracks. At this time, there is no additional square footage being proposed. All the proposed improvements will fall within the existing building. The current student enrollment is 840 students and there is no expansion of student enrollment or school capacity proposed as part of the project. City Council 26 — 294 1/16/2024 AA No. 2023-04 and ZOA No. 2023-03 for Vista Heritage Charter School at 601 North Fairview Street December 11, 2023 Page 3 Table 1: Project and Location Information Item Information Project Address and Council Ward 601 North Fairview Street — Ward 5 Nearest Intersection Fairview Street and Fifth Street General Plan Designation Industrial/Flex-Medium (Flex-1.5) Existing Zoning Designation Light Industrial (M1) Proposed Zoning Designation Specific Development No. 82 (SD-82) Surrounding Land Uses North Pacific Electric Right -of -Way (ROW)/OCT Streetcar and School District Offices East Pacific Electric Right -of -Way (ROW)/OCT Streetcar South Vista Heritage Charter School and Industrial Businesses West Lydia Romero -Cruz Academy Property Size 0.905 Acres (39,437 square feet) Existing Site Development The subject site contains a one-story, 5,837-square-foot building. Existing Site Uses Auto repair uses to be converted into administrative uses. Tenant Size 5,837 square feet Use Permissions Amendment to allow Administrative Offices as a permitted use on Parcel 4, and Outdoor Play Areas as a permitted use ancillary to schools on Parcel 2, within the SD-82 and subject toopera ional standards. Zoning Code Sections Affected Uses SAMC Section 41-593 and SD-82 Operational Standards SAMC Section 41-593 and SD-82 Table 2: Development Standards Standard Required by SAMC and SD-82 Provided Permitted Uses Administrative Offices on Parcel Complies: The administrative office 4; and Outdoor Play Areas as a building is 5,837 square feet is permitted use ancillary to located on Parcel 4, and the Outdoor schools on Parcel 2 Play Area is located on Parcel 2. Walls and Screening Roof equipment shall be Complies: New roof mounted screened. mechanical equipment will be screened with a parapet wall. Additionally, the line -of -sight illustrates that the equipment will not be visible to pedestrians in the new vicinity. Landscaping 10-foot wide landscape area is Complies: the site plan illustrates a required along north property 10-foot wide landscape area along line and landscaped planter shall the north property line and landscape meet the commercial landscape planters that comply with commercial standards landscape standards. Parking Per previous entitlements, the Complies: The site plan illustrates 293 site must contain a minimum of parking spaces. 287 parking spaces. City Council 26 — 295 1/16/2024 AA No. 2023-04 and ZOA No. 2023-03 for Vista Heritage Charter School at 601 North Fairview Street December 11, 2023 Page 4 Standard Required by SAMC and SD-82 Provided Floor Area Ratio FAR 1.5 maximum I Complies: 0.14 FAR Project Background On October 6, 2008, the City Council approved several entitlements for the Civic Center Business Park located at the northeast corner of Fifth Street and Fairview Street, including Amendment Application No. 2008-06 (Ordinance No. NS-2777). The amendment application allowed for a zone change of the business park site from M1 to SD-82. The request was initiated by the Templo Calvario Assembly of God Church, which at the time was proposing to expand their worship facilities by constructing a larger sanctuary at 2501 West Fifth Street. However, the specific development still allowed for the retention of the existing office, retail, and industrial uses operating in the business park, by allowing all uses within the Light Industrial (M1) zoning district. Subsequently, on January 21, 2020, the City Council approved additional entitlements affecting the business park, including ZOA No. 2019-01 (Ordinance No. NS-2983), to allow school uses by right. Prior to the approval of ZOA No. 2019-01, school uses had been in operation at the business park. Specifically, Templo Calvario operated a preschool and kindergarten at 2609 West Fifth Street since the 1990s. In 2003, the Edward B. Cole Senior Academy occupied the site until it relocated to another Santa Ana location in 2010. From 2011 to 2015, Templo Calvario once again operated a school at this location. In 2015, Vista Heritage Charter School took over operations at the site. In 2019, Vista Heritage Charter School expanded their 6-8th grade operation located at 2609 W. Fifth Street to include kindergarten through 5th grades within two adjacent suites, pursuant to approval of ZOA No. 2019-01, which also allowed an increase in student enrollment and school operations. Currently, Vista Heritage Charter School occupies approximately 66,000 square feet of building space and accommodates a maximum of 870 students, at 2601 through 2617 West Fifth Street. Project Analysis The proposed project aims to achieve two primary objectives. First, the zoning ordinance amendment is seeking to expand the boundaries of SD-82 and allow an Administrative Office use on Parcel 4, and an Outdoor Play Areas on Parcel 2, as an ancillary use to the Vista Heritage Charter School. Second, the amendment application intends to amend the zoning map by rezoning the subject property from M1 to SD-82. The following sections of this report provides analysis for the proposed action item and the basis for staff's recommendation of approval for the project. City Council 26 — 296 1/16/2024 AA No. 2023-04 and ZOA No. 2023-03 for Vista Heritage Charter School at 601 North Fairview Street December 11, 2023 Page 5 Zoning Ordinance Amendment Pursuant to SAMC Section 41-593.1, the purpose and intent of a specific development (SD) designation is to provide a tailored and flexible zoning approach to address specific and exceptional circumstances associated with certain parcels, while protecting and promoting the public health, safety and general welfare of the City and its residents. These circumstances may include unique characteristics, historical significance, or specific community needs that deviate from the standard zoning regulations. Moreover, SD designations protect and enhance the value of properties by encouraging the use of good design principles and concepts; encouraging, securing and maintaining the orderly and harmonious appearance, attractiveness and aesthetic development; providing a method whereby specific development plans are based on the general plan; and by recognizing the interdependence of land values and aesthetics and providing a method to implement interdependence. For this specific proposal, the applicant is proposing to amend the SD-82 document to allow Administrative Offices as a permitted use on Parcel 4 and Outdoor Play Areas on Parcel 2, ancillary to the existing school. In response to this application, staff is proposing that SD-82 be revised pursuant to Table 3 below: Table 3: Permitted Uses and Operational Standards for SD-82 REQUIREMENT ISSUE AND PROPOSED AMENDMENT STANDARDS: Issue: School traffic may conflict with local traffic patterns and adjacent uses. In Circulation and Parking primarily industrial districts, like SD-82, the impacts could be particularly Management Plan severe. Proposed Amendment: The school prepared a Circulation and Parking Management Plan ("Plan") that was reviewed as part of the Development Project Review (DP) that was submitted in February of 2023. The Plan takes into account the parking, onsite circulation, drop off, and pick up. The Plan identifies how the school buses will pick-up and drop-off students within the front parking lot. The Plan is designed to accommodate the existing school population and to ensure that there is no vehicle queuing off -site or conflicts with the adjacent industrial buildings to the north and west of the site. Future modifications to the Plan may require a traffic analysis to demonstrate compliance. Lastly, at this time, the project does not propose an increase in student enrollment or additional square footage. City Council 26 — 297 1/16/2024 AA No. 2023-04 and ZOA No. 2023-03 for Vista Heritage Charter School at 601 North Fairview Street December 11, 2023 Page 6 REQUIREMENT ISSUE AND PROPOSED AMENDMENT Physical Education Issue: Activity Area Noise resulting from physical education or after -school sports activities can Standards impact adjacent residents or tenants. Proposed Amendment: Physical education activity areas shall be designed so that their use does not disturb the commercial or industrial uses during regular business hours and residential uses between the hours of 8 p.m. and 7 a.m. As proposed, the physical education activities will be relocated to a designated gated area located directly adjacent to the existing school. In addition, the school's regular hours are Monday through Friday from 8:30 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. Outdoor activities will not take place outside of the school's regular hours. Furthermore, the noise sources are typically intermittent and short in duration. Additionally, the impact of noise diminishes significantly with distance from its origin. The sensitive receptors (residential zones and land uses) are situated approximately 200 feet away. Therefore, the proposed Outdoor Play Area's generated noise would not adversely affect these sensitive receptors. Administrative Offices Issue: The administrative office may increase parking demand and traffic generation of the entire site. Proposed Amendment: The proposed change of use is not expected to impact the parking demand on -site due to specific parking requirements. The administrative office requires three (3) parking spaces per 1,000 square feet; whereas, the auto - repair businesses required five (5) parking spaces per 1,000 square feet. Additionally, the administrative office will only be employing a total of ten (10) individuals and the total increase in trip generation during peak hours is not significant enough to trigger concerns. Maximum Student Issue: Enrollment Number of students can dictate the level of impact on adjacent uses. More students mean more cars or buses picking up or dropping off students, more children on the playground and more noise Proposed Amendment: The proposed number of students will not increase. The number of student enrollment will remain at a maximum of 870 students. This enrollment cap will remain in the SD document. Industrial Uses Issue: The current list of permitted uses in SD-82 contains various industrial uses, which are no longer consistent with the General Plan land use designation and the designated focus area. The Flex-1.5 land use designation encourages industrial uses that do not produce significant air pollutants including office -industrial flex spaces, small-scale clean manufacturing, research and development, among other uses. Moreover, the focus area is intended to transition a group of auto -oriented neighborhoods and City Council 26 — 298 1/16/2024 AA No. 2023-04 and ZOA No. 2023-03 for Vista Heritage Charter School at 601 North Fairview Street December 11, 2023 Page 7 REQUIREMENT ISSUE AND PROPOSED AMENDMENT institutions into a series of transit -oriented neighborhoods that support and benefit from future streetcar stops. Proposed Amendment: The proposed amendment will update the list of permissible uses per zone to establish consistency with the Flex-1.5 General Plan land use designation and the focus area. Amendment Application Currently, the site to the south of 601 N. Fairview Street is zoned SD-82, and the proposed rezoning intends to align the subject site with the existing development to the south. Within the SD-82 regulations, permissible uses encompass industrial, school, and church uses. Expanding the SD-82 boundaries will accommodate additional administrative office use at 601 N. Fairview Street. This zoning adjustment aims to repurpose the existing industrial building, historically serving as an auto -repair business, into an administrative office space. Under the current M1 zoning, only up to thirty percent of the gross floor area can be allocated for administrative office use. The proposed rezoning, coupled with amendments to the SD-82 regulations, seeks to enable the existing building's operation as an administrative office without constraint, limited to Parcel 4. More importantly, the rezoning is not anticipated to exacerbate traffic flow, parking demands, or noise impacts. As detailed in Table 3, the proposed rezoning is projected to address and mitigate any potential adverse effects on the surrounding community. General Plan Consistency The approval of the subject project will be consistent with the General Plan land use designation and the designated focus area. The subject site is located within the Industrial/Flex-Low (Flex-1.5) General Plan land use designation. The Flex-1.5 land use designation encourages a myriad of industrial uses that do not produce significant air pollutants including office -industrial flex spaces, small-scale clean manufacturing, research and development, among other uses. Furthermore, the site is located within one of the five focus areas as prescribed by the General Plan. Specifically, the site is located within the West Santa Ana Boulevard Focus Area. The focus area is intended to transition a group of auto -oriented neighborhoods and institutions into a series of transit -oriented neighborhoods that support and benefit from future streetcar stops. In order to accomplish the goals of the General Plan, the focus area promotes infill development while respecting established neighborhoods and providing buffers from industrial to residential neighborhoods. The proposed project will create a buffer from industrial uses to City Council 26 — 299 1/16/2024 AA No. 2023-04 and ZOA No. 2023-03 for Vista Heritage Charter School at 601 North Fairview Street December 11, 2023 Page 8 residential by changing the use of an auto -repair building into an office space. Additionally, the proposed project proposes landscape improvements and a community garden that will further act as buffers and accomplish the goals of the General Plan. Moreover, the approval of the proposed applications will be consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan, specifically Goals 1, 2, and 3 of the Land Use Element (LU). Goal 1 of the LU provides a land use plan that improves the quality of life and respects the existing community. Policy 1-8 encourages new development to provide a new community benefit. The change of use from auto -repair to office will provide a benefit to the community by reducing the noise, fumes, and waste that stem from auto -repair -like businesses. Additionally, the outdoor play area for the school will allow the school to offer their students a space for recreational purposed within their business hours. Goal 2 of the LU seeks a balance of land uses to meet Santa Ana's diverse needs. Policy 2-6 promote rehabilitation of properties and encourage increased levels of capital investment to create a safe and attractive environment. Approval of the amendment application and the zoning ordinance amendment will promote the rehabilitation of the existing building with a new fagade and site improvements. Goal 3 of the LU seeks to preserve and improve the character and integrity of existing neighborhoods and districts. Policy 3-7 promotes a clean, safe, and creative environment for Santa Ana's residential, workers and visitors. Approval of the project will promote a clean, safe, and creative environment for Santa Ana's residents by reducing hazardous waste produced by auto repair businesses, enhancing the architecture of the existing building, and enhancing the site by introducing new landscape. Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions During the development review phase of the project, the City obtained information concerning the Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) governing both Parcel 2 and Parcel 4 illustrated in Exhibit 9. These CC&Rs outline potential use restrictions that could impact these parcels. However, these stipulations do not hinder the City's authority to proceed with the intended rezoning and revising of the SD-82 text. Furthermore, the text of SD-82 requires the update and clarification of these CC&Rs, mandating their refinement and subsequent submission to the City before permit issuance. Public Notification and Community Outreach Project notifications were posted, published, and mailed in accordance with City and State regulations. Copies of the public notice, including a 1,000-foot notification radius map, and the site posting are provided in Exhibit 5. There are no established Neighborhood Associations in the vicinity as the property is surrounded by offices and the City of Costa Mesa. At the time this report was printed, no issues of concern were raised regarding the proposed development. City Council 26 — 300 1/16/2024 AA No. 2023-04 and ZOA No. 2023-03 for Vista Heritage Charter School at 601 North Fairview Street December 11, 2023 Page 9 In addition to the above noticing, the project was subject to the City's Sunshine Ordinance (Ordinance No. NS-3040) requiring two meetings to facilitate early public participation. The first community meeting was held March 6, 2023. Eleven members of the community attended and posted questions relating to on -site traffic circulation, the outdoor play area, the location of the proposed fences, and parking concerns. The second community meeting was held May 15, 2023, during which 10 members of the community attended and expressed that the site plan did not address the traffic circulation concerns raised previously. Materials from the two required community meetings are included with this report as Exhibit 8, and all materials were published to the project's webpage on the City's website at santa-ana.org/vista-charter-school/. Additional Outreach The applicant organized an additional meeting on May 23, 2023 with stakeholders, City staff, and Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) staff to discuss the parking requirements of Parcel 2 and Parcel 4 listed in the CC&Rs and optional overflow parking not listed in the CC&Rs for Templo Calvario. Moreover, on November 3 and November 15, the applicant met with various stakeholders to discuss the proposed site plan, parking requirements, and clarification on the CC&Rs limitations. The purpose of the meetings was to ensure ongoing communication about the steps and substance needed in order to revise the CC&Rs to reflect the current project, should the requested entitlements be approved. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the CEQA Guidelines, the project is exempt from further review per Section 15301 Existing Facilities (Class 1 — Existing Facilities) of the CEQA Guidelines and per Section 15183 (Projects Consistent with a Community Plan, General Plan, or Zoning) of the CEQA Guidelines. Class 1 exemption applies to the operation, repair, maintenance, permitting, leasing, licensing, or minor alteration of existing public or private structures, facilities, mechanical equipment, or topographical features, involving negligible or no expansion of existing or former use as determined by the lead agency. The subject project is proposing the change of use of an existing industrial building that was previously used for an auto repair business to be used for administrative office purposes. Additionally, the project is exempt from further review per Section 15183 (Projects Consistent with a Community Plan, General Plan, or Zoning) of the CEQA Guidelines. The environmental review contained in Exhibit 7 has been prepared, and peer reviewed by a qualified CEQA consultant hired by the City, to assess the potential for the proposed project to result in environmental effects and whether the proposed project qualified for an exemption under Section 15183 of the CEQA Guidelines. Moreover, the analysis City Council 26 — 301 1/16/2024 AA No. 2023-04 and ZOA No. 2023-03 for Vista Heritage Charter School at 601 North Fairview Street December 11, 2023 Page 10 evaluated whether the potential environmental impacts are addressed in the City of Santa Ana General Plan Update Final Recirculated Program Environmental Impact Report (GPU EIR). Specifically, the analysis evaluates the change of use of the existing 5,837- square-foot building from auto -repair to administrative office and site improvements that include new landscaping, fagade remodel, and new outdoor areas for the office and the school. CEQA Guidelines Section 15183 allows a streamlined environmental review process for projects that are consistent with the densities established by existing zoning, community plan, or general plan policies for which an EIR was certified and does not require additional environmental review, except as might be necessary to examine whether there are project -specific significant effects which are peculiar to the project or its site. Moreover, projects that are consistent with the densities and use characteristics considered by the GPU EIR may qualify for the CEQA Guidelines Section 15183 Exemption process. This exemption process may be used when a project meets the following conditions: a) The project is consistent with the development density established by existing zoning, community plan or general plan policies for which an EIR was certified. b) There are no project specific effects which are peculiar to the project or its site. c) There are no project specific impacts which the prior EIR failed to analyze as significant effects. d) There are no potentially significant off -site and/or cumulative impacts which the prior EIR failed to evaluate. e) There is no substantial new information which results in more severe impacts than anticipated by the prior EIR. The GPU was adopted, and the GPU EIR certified, in April 2022 (State Clearinghouse Number 2020029087); the GPU went into effect on May 26, 2022. Any decision by the City affecting land use and development must be consistent with the GPU. The GPU EIR evaluates the potential environmental effects associated with implementation of the GPU and addresses appropriate and feasible mitigation measures that would minimize or eliminate these impacts. Pursuant to Section 15183(i)(2) of the CEQA Guidelines, a project is consistent with the GPU if the development density does not exceed what was contemplated and analyzed for the parcel(s) in the certified GPU EIR and complies with the associated standards applicable to that development density. Development density standards can include the number of dwelling units per acre, the number of people in a given area, floor area ratio (FAR), and other measures of building intensity, building height, size limitations, and use restrictions. The GPU identifies that the Interim Development Standard for the FLEX-1.5 area are those development standards outlined for the M1 zoning designation. The M1 zone provides for a variety of light industrial uses, including warehousing, manufacture, City Council 26 — 302 1/16/2024 AA No. 2023-04 and ZOA No. 2023-03 for Vista Heritage Charter School at 601 North Fairview Street December 11, 2023 Page 11 assembly, machine shops, wholesale businesses and ancillary uses such as office uses that do not exceed thirty (30) percent of the gross floor area. The Project would result in a FAR of 0.14, which is within the projections of the GPU EIR, which evaluated a density of 1.5 FAR on the site. The GPU EIR adequately anticipated and analyzed the impacts of this Project, identified applicable mitigation measures necessary to reduce impacts of the Project, and the Project implements the applicable mitigation measures. The Project, therefore, qualifies for an exemption from additional environmental review as set forth in State CEQA Guidelines Section 15183. The full exemption analysis is provided as Exhibit 7 of this report. Based on this analysis, a Notice of Exemption, Environmental Review No. 2023-40 will be filed for this project. ECONOMIC AND FISCAL IMPACTS To date, the proposed project has generated a total of 156 temporary employment opportunities, including environmental engineers, environmental remediation technicians, demolition crew, architects, engineers, development consultants, and an attorney. Additionally, the new administrative office will create ten permanent employment positions. Moreover, the applicant will pay approximately $46,235 in entitlement, plan check, and permit fees. There is no fiscal impact associated with this action. EXHIBIT(S) 1. Amendment Application Ordinance 2. Zoning Ordinance Amendment Ordinance 3. Vicinity Zoning and Aerial Map 4. Site Photo 5. Full Project Plans 6. Renderings 7. Environmental Analysis and Exemption 8. Community Meetings Documents 9. Parcel Map in Recording No. 86-284222 10. Copy of Public Notices Submitted By: Fernanda Arias, Assistant Planner II Approved By: Minh Thai, Executive Director, Planning and Building Agency City Council 26 — 303 1/16/2024 ORDINANCE NO. NS-XXXX AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA APPROVING AMENDMENT APPLICATION NO. 2023-04 AMENDING THE ZONING FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 601 NORTH FAIRVIEW STREET (APN: 405-241-04) FROM LIGHT INDUSTRIAL (M1) TO SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT NO. 82 (SD-82) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby finds, determines and declares as follows: A. Red Hook Capital Partners, LLC with Vista Heritage Charter Schools ("Applicant") representing 2609 W. 5t" Street LLC (Property Owner) is requesting approval of Amendment Application (AA) No. 2023-04 to change the zoning designation of the property located at 601 North Fairview Street (APN: 405-241-04) from Light Industrial (M1) to Specific Development No. 82 (SD-82) in order to facilitate the change of use of an existing auto -repair business to an administrative office. B. Chapter 41, Article I, Division 1, Section 41-1 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code establishes that because of the necessity of segregating the location of residences, businesses, trades and industries; regulating the use of buildings, structures, and land; and regulating the location, height, bulk and size of buildings and structures, the size of yards and open spaces, the City is divided into land -use districts of such number, shape and area as may be considered best suited to carry out these regulations and provide for their enforcement. The regulations are considered necessary in order to: encourage the most appropriate use of land, conserve and stabilize property value, provide adequate open spaces for light and air and to prevent and fight fires, prevent undue concentration of population, lessen congestion on streets and highways, and promote the health, safety and general welfare of the people, all as part of the general plan of the City. The City of Santa Ana has adopted a zoning map which has since been amended from time to time. C. On April 19, 2022, the City adopted the General Plan Update and it went into effect on May 26, 2022. The approval of the subject project is consistent with the Industrial/Flex-Low (Flex-1.5) General Plan land use designation and the designated West Santa Ana Boulevard Focus Area. The Flex-1.5 land use designation encourage a myriad of industrial uses that do not produce significant air pollutants including office -industrial flex spaces, small-scale clean manufacturing, among other uses. Furthermore, the focus area is intended to transition a group of auto -oriented neighborhoods and Ordinance No. NS-XXXX City Council 26 — 304 1/16/ of 6 institutions into a series of transit -oriented neighborhoods that support and benefit from future streetcar stops. In order to accomplish the goals of the General Plan, the focus area promotes infill development while respecting established neighborhoods and providing buffers from industrial to residential neighborhoods. The proposed project will create a buffer from industrial uses to residential by changing the use of an auto -repair building into an office space. Additionally, the proposed project proposes landscape improvements and a community garden that will further act as buffers and accomplish the goals of the General Plan. D. The entire Project as currently proposed entails, among other things, (1) Approval of Amendment Application No. 2023-07 to change the site's zoning designation from Light Industrial (M1) to Specific Development No. 82 (SD-82) and (2) approval of Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2023-03 to expand the boundaries of SD-82 and to allow for Administrative Offices as a permitted use on Parcel 4, and an Outdoor Play Area in Parcel 2 ancillary to the Vista Heritage Charter School. E. The Applicant has demonstrated compliance with all requirements of the Sunshine Ordinance codified at Santa Ana Municipal Code Section 2-153, including public notification and hosting of required community meetings. Materials resulting from the meetings were subsequently posted to the City's webpage for the project. F. On December 11, 2023, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing and voted to recommend that the City Council adopt an ordinance approving Amendment Application No. 2023-04. G. For the reasons contained herein, and each of them, Amendment Application No. 2023-04 is hereby found and determined to be consistent with the intent and purpose of Chapter 41 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code; thus, changing the zoning district is found to be consistent with the General Plan of the City of Santa Ana and otherwise justified by the public necessity, convenience, and general welfare. Section 2. The Amendment Application consists of amendments to the Zoning Map, as shown in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Section 3. The City Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in the analysis performed pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Environmental Review No. 2023-40). In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the CEQA Guidelines, the project is categorically exempt from further review per Section 15301 (Class 1 — Existing Facilities) of the CEQA Guidelines. Class 1 exemption applies to the operation, repair maintenance, permitting, leasing, licensing, or minor alteration of existing public or private structures, facilities, mechanical equipment, or topographical features, involving negligible or no expansion of existing or former use. The subject project is proposing the change of use of an existing industrial building that was previously used for an auto repair business to be used for administrative office purposes. Additionally, the project is exempt from further review Ordinance No. NS-XXXX City Council 26 — 305 1/16/ of 6 pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21083.3 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15183, the Project is exempt from further review. This type of exemption analysis evaluates whether the potential environmental impacts of the proposed change of use for the existing 5,837-square-foot building from auto -repair to administrative office and site improvements that include new landscape, fagade remodel, and new outdoor areas for the office and the school are addressed in the City of Santa Ana General Plan Update Final Recirculated Program Environmental Impact Report (GPU EIR). A rezoning that is consistent with an adopted general plan falls within this exemption. (A) As set forth in CEQA Guidelines Section 15183(a), projects that are "consistent with the development density established by the existing zoning, community plan or general plan policies for which an EIR was certified shall not require additional environmental review, except as might be necessary to examine whether there are project -specific significant effects which are peculiar to the project or its site." The CEQA Guidelines further state that "[i]f an impact is not peculiar to the parcel or to the project, has been addressed as a significant effect in the prior EIR, or can be substantially mitigated by the imposition of uniformly applied development policies or standards ... then an additional EIR need not be prepared for the project solely on the basis of that impact." CEQA Guidelines Section 15183(c). (B) The GPU was adopted, and the GPU EIR certified, in April 2022 (State Clearinghouse Number 2020029087); the GPU went into effect on May 26, 2022. Any decision by the City affecting land use and development must be consistent with the GPU. The GPU EIR evaluates the potential environmental effects associated with implementation of the GPU and addresses appropriate and feasible mitigation measures that would minimize or eliminate these impacts. A project is consistent with the GPU if its development density is the same or less than the standard expressed for the involved parcel in the general plan for which an EIR has been certified, and the project complies with the density -related standards contained in that plan. CEQA Guidelines section 15183(i)(2). Development density standards can include the number of dwelling units per acre, the number of people in a given area, floor area ratio (FAR), and other measures of building intensity, building height, size limitations, and use restrictions. (C) The GPU identifies that the Interim Development Standard for the FLEX-1.5 area is M1. The M1 zone provides for a variety of light industrial uses, including warehousing, manufacture, assembly, machine shops, wholesale businesses and ancillary uses such as office uses that do not exceed thirty (30) percent of the gross floor area. The Project would result in a FAR of 0.14, which is within the projections of the GPU EIR, which evaluated a density of 1.5 FAR on the site. The GPU EIR adequately anticipated and analyzed the impacts of this Project and identified applicable mitigation measures necessary to reduce impacts of the Project, and the Project implements the applicable mitigation measures. (D) Specifically, the Project qualifies for the exemption because the following findings can be made: 1. The Project is consistent with the development density established by existing zoning, community plan or general plan policies for which an EIR was certified. Ordinance No. NS-XXXX City Council 26 — 306 1/16/ of 6 The Project would result in a FAR of 0.14, which is less than the maximum FAR of 1.5 allowable in the FLEX-1.5 designated area, which is the development density established by the GPU and analyzed in the GPU EIR. The Project site has an Interim Development Standard of M-1 (light Industrial zone). The M-1 zone does not have density requirements. 2. There are no Project specific effects which are peculiar to the Project or its site, and which the GPU EIR failed to analyze as significant effects. The subject property is similar to other properties in the area, including its land use designation and zoning. The property does not support any peculiar environmental features, and the Project would not result in any peculiar effects. In addition, as explained further in the prepared Exemption Checklist, project impacts were adequately analyzed by the GPU EIR; and as detailed in the GPU EIR, development projects pursuant to the GPU, such as the proposed Project, could result in potentially significant impacts to air quality, greenhouse gas emissions, and noise. However, applicable mitigation measures specified within the GPU EIR would reduce potential impacts to a less than significant level. 3. There are no potentially significant off -site and/or cumulative impacts which the GPU EIR failed to evaluate. The Project is consistent with the density and use characteristics of the development considered by the GPU EIR and would represent a small part of the growth that was forecast for build -out of the GPU. The GPU EIR considered the incremental impacts of the Project, and as explained further in the prepared Exemption Checklist, no potentially significant off -site or cumulative impacts have been identified which were not previously evaluated. 4. There is no substantial new information which results in more severe impacts than anticipated by the GPU EIR. As explained in the prepared Exemption Checklist, no new information has been identified which would result in a determination of a more severe impact than what had been anticipated by the GPU EIR. 5. As explained in the prepared Exemption Checklist, the Project will undertake feasible mitigation measures specified in the GPU EIR. These GPU EIR mitigation measures will be undertaken through Project design, compliance with regulations and ordinances, and through the Project's conditions of approval. (E) The Project therefore qualifies for an exemption from additional environmental review as set forth in Public Resources Code section 21083.3 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15183. The full exemption analysis is provided as Exhibit 7 of the staff report accompanying this Ordinance. Based on this analysis, a Notice of Exemption, Environmental Review No. 2023-40 will be filed for this project. Section 4. An amended Sectional District Map, showing the above described changes in use district designation, is hereby approved and attached hereto as Exhibit A, and incorporated by this reference as though fully set forth herein. Section 5. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana, after conducting the public hearing, hereby approves Amendment Application No. 2023-04. This decision is Ordinance No. NS-XXXX City Council 26 — 307 1/16/ 4 of 6 based upon the evidence submitted at the above said hearing, which includes, but is not limited to: the Request for Planning Commission Action dated December 11, 2023 and exhibits attached hereto; and the public testimony, written and oral, all of which are incorporated herein by this reference. Section 6. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby declares that it would have adopted this ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions be declared invalid or unconstitutional. Section 7. This Ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days after its adoption. Section 8. The Clerk of the Council shall certify the adoption of this ordinance and shall cause the same to be published as required by law. ADOPTED this day of , 2023. Valerie Amezcua Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: Sonia R. Carvalho City Attorney By: ohs om J e Montoya Assistant City Attorney AYES: Councilmembers NOES: Councilmembers ABSTAIN: Councilmembers NOT PRESENT: Councilmembers Ordinance No. NS-XXXX City Council 26 — 308 1/16/ of CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY I, Jennifer L. Hall, City Clerk, do hereby attest to and certify the attached Ordinance No. NS- XXXX to be the original ordinance adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on , 2023 and that said ordinance was published in accordance with the Charter of the City of Santa Ana. Date: City Clerk City of Santa Ana Ordinance No. NS-XXXX City Council 26 — 309 1/16/ of 6 ORDINANCE NO. NS-XXXX ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. 2023-03 — AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AMENDING SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT NO. 82 (SD-82) TO EXPAND THE BOUNDARIES OF THE SD-82 AND TO AMEND VARIOUS SECTIONS OF THE SD-82 TO ALLOW FOR THE CREATION OF THREE (3) LAND USE ZONES, NEW PERMITTED USES AND ANCILLARY USES, AND ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS FOR PROPERTY MAINTENANCE, COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS (CC&RS) AND RECIPROCAL PARKING AND ACCESS AGREEMENTS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby finds, determines and declares as follows: A. On October 20, 2008, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. NS-2777, rezoning the property located at 2501 West Fifth Street, described as Parcels 1 and 2 of Parcel Map No. 84-886, as shown on a map filed in Book 198, Pages 19-20 of Parcels Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of Orange County, California, from Light Industrial (M-1) to Specific Development Plan No. 82 (SD-82). B. On January 21, 2020, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. NS-2983, to amend the Santa Ana Municipal Code (SAMC) to include a definition of "schools"; allow schools as a permitted use in SD-82; to adopt a set of operational standards for schools within SD-82; allow Vista Heritage Charter School to expand to 66,000 square feet in size; and allow Vista Heritage Charter School to expand the student enrollment to 870 students. C. The proposed Project would only affect Parcel 1, 2, and 4, of Parcel Map No. 84-886, as shown on a Map filed in Book 198, Pages 19-20 of Parcel Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of Orange County, California. D. The proposed Project entails, among other things, (1) Approval of Amendment Application No. 2023-04 to change the zoning designation for the property located at 601 North Fairview Street (APN: 405-241-04) from Light Industrial (M1) to Specific Development No. 82 (SD-82); and (2) approval of Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2023-03 to expand the boundaries of SD-82 and to allow for Administrative Offices, Surface Parking, and Private Outdoor Community Areas as a permitted use on Parcel 4, and Outdoor Play Area on Parcel 2, ancillary to the Vista Heritage Charter School. Parcel 2 and 4 are as shown on Parcel Map No. 84-886, as Ordinance No. NS-XXXX City Council 26 — 311 1714 5 shown on a Map filed in Book 198, Pages 19-20 of Parcel Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of Orange County, California. E. The approval of the text amendments, permissible uses, and development standards are consistent with the General Plan land use designation of Industrial/Flex-1.5 (Flex 1.5) and the designated West Santa Ana Boulevard Focus Area. On April 19, 2022, the City adopted the General Plan Update which went into effect on May 26, 2022. The Flex-1.5 land use designation encourages industrial uses that do not produce significant air pollutants including office -industrial flex spaces, small-scale clean manufacturing, among other uses. Furthermore, the focus area is intended to transition a group of auto -oriented neighborhoods and institutions into a series of transit -oriented neighborhoods that support and benefit from future streetcar stops. In order to accomplish the goals of the General Plan, the focus area promotes infill development while respecting established neighborhoods and providing buffers from industrial to residential neighborhoods. The proposed project will create a buffer from industrial uses to residential by changing the use of an auto -repair building into an office space. Additionally, the proposed project proposes landscape improvements and a community garden that will further act as buffers and accomplish the goals of the General Plan. F. The applicant has demonstrated compliance with all requirements of the Sunshine Ordinance codified at SAMC Section 2-153, including public notification and hosting of required community meetings. Materials resulting from the meetings were subsequently posted to the City's webpage for the project. G. On December 11, 2023, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing and voted to recommend that the City Council adopt an ordinance approving Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2023-03. H. For the reasons contained herein, and each of them, Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2023-3 is hereby found and determined to be consistent with the intent and purpose of Chapter 41 of the SAMC; thus, changing the zoning district is found to be consistent with the General Plan of the City of Santa Ana and otherwise justified by the public necessity, convenience, and general welfare. Section 2. The recitals above are each incorporated by reference and adopted as findings by the City Council. Section 3. The City Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in the analysis performed pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Environmental Review No. 2023-40). In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the CEQA Guidelines, the project is categorically exempt from further review per Section 15301 (Class 1 — Existing Facilities) of the CEQA Guidelines. Class 1 exemption applies to the operation, repair maintenance, permitting, Ordinance No. NS-XXXX City Council 26 — 312 1714 5 leasing, licensing, or minor alteration of existing public or private structures, facilities, mechanical equipment, or topographical features, involving negligible or no expansion of existing or former use. The subject project is proposing the change of use of an existing industrial building that was previously used for an auto repair business to be used for administrative office purposes. Additionally, the project is exempt from further review pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21083.3 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15183, the Project is exempt from further review. This type of exemption analysis evaluates whether the potential environmental impacts of the proposed change of use for the existing 5,837-square-foot building from auto -repair to administrative office and site improvements that include new landscape, fagade remodel, and new outdoor areas for the office and the school are addressed in the City of Santa Ana General Plan Update Final Recirculated Program Environmental Impact Report (GPU EIR). A rezoning that is consistent with an adopted general plan falls within this exemption. (A) As set forth in CEQA Guidelines Section 15183(a), projects that are "consistent with the development density established by the existing zoning, community plan or general plan policies for which an EIR was certified shall not require additional environmental review, except as might be necessary to examine whether there are project -specific significant effects which are peculiar to the project or its site." The CEQA Guidelines further state that "[i]f an impact is not peculiar to the parcel or to the project, has been addressed as a significant effect in the prior EIR, or can be substantially mitigated by the imposition of uniformly applied development policies or standards .. . then an additional EIR need not be prepared for the project solely on the basis of that impact." CEQA Guidelines Section 15183(c). (B) The GPU was adopted, and the GPU EIR certified, in April 2022 (State Clearinghouse Number 2020029087); the GPU went into effect on May 26, 2022. Any decision by the City affecting land use and development must be consistent with the GPU. The GPU EIR evaluates the potential environmental effects associated with implementation of the GPU and addresses appropriate and feasible mitigation measures that would minimize or eliminate these impacts. A project is consistent with the GPU if its development density is the same or less than the standard expressed for the involved parcel in the general plan for which an EIR has been certified, and the project complies with the density -related standards contained in that plan. CEQA Guidelines section 15183(i)(2). Development density standards can include the number of dwelling units per acre, the number of people in a given area, floor area ratio (FAR), and other measures of building intensity, building height, size limitations, and use restrictions. (C) The GPU identifies that the Interim Development Standard for the FLEX-1.5 area is M1. The M1 zone provides for a variety of light industrial uses, including warehousing, manufacture, assembly, machine shops, wholesale businesses and ancillary uses such as office uses that do not exceed thirty (30) percent of the gross floor area. The Project would result in a FAR of 0.14, which is within the projections of the GPU EIR, which evaluated a density of 1.5 FAR on the site. The GPU EIR adequately anticipated and analyzed the impacts of this Project and identified applicable mitigation measures necessary to reduce impacts of the Project, and the Project implements the applicable mitigation measures. Ordinance No. NS-XXXX City Council 26 — 313 171085 5 (D) Specifically, the Project qualifies for the exemption because the following findings can be made: 1. The Project is consistent with the development density established by existing zoning, community plan or general plan policies for which an EIR was certified. The Project would result in a FAR of 0.14, which is less than the maximum FAR of 1.5 allowable in the FLEX-1.5 designated area, which is the development density established by the GPU and analyzed in the GPU EIR. The Project site has an Interim Development Standard of M-1 (light Industrial zone). The M-1 zone does not have density requirements. 2. There are no Project specific effects which are peculiar to the Project or its site, and which the GPU EIR failed to analyze as significant effects. The subject property is similar to other properties in the area, including its land use designation and zoning. The property does not support any peculiar environmental features, and the Project would not result in any peculiar effects. In addition, as explained further in the prepared Exemption Checklist, project impacts were adequately analyzed by the GPU EIR; and as detailed in the GPU EIR, development projects pursuant to the GPU, such as the proposed Project, could result in potentially significant impacts to air quality, greenhouse gas emissions, and noise. However, applicable mitigation measures specified within the GPU EIR would reduce potential impacts to a less than significant level. 3. There are no potentially significant off -site and/or cumulative impacts which the GPU EIR failed to evaluate. The Project is consistent with the density and use characteristics of the development considered by the GPU EIR and would represent a small part of the growth that was forecast for build -out of the GPU. The GPU EIR considered the incremental impacts of the Project, and as explained further in the prepared Exemption Checklist, no potentially significant off -site or cumulative impacts have been identified which were not previously evaluated. 4. There is no substantial new information which results in more severe impacts than anticipated by the GPU EIR. As explained in the prepared Exemption Checklist, no new information has been identified which would result in a determination of a more severe impact than what had been anticipated by the GPU EIR. 5. As explained in the prepared Exemption Checklist, the Project will undertake feasible mitigation measures specified in the GPU EIR. These GPU EIR mitigation measures will be undertaken through Project design, compliance with regulations and ordinances, and through the Project's conditions of approval. (E) The Project therefore qualifies for an exemption from additional environmental review as set forth in Public Resources Code section 21083.3 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15183. The full exemption analysis is provided as Exhibit 7 of the staff report accompanying this Ordinance. Based on this analysis, a Notice of Exemption, Environmental Review No. 2023-40 will be filed for this project. Ordinance No. NS-XXXX City Council 26 — 314 1714 5 Section 4. The Specific Development No. 82 (SD-82) zoning document is hereby amended to read as follows: TEMPLO CALVARIO ASSEMBLY OF GOD Specific Development Plan No. 82 Section 1. Applicability of Ordinance The specific development zoning district for the Templo Calvario Assembly of God Church, as authorized by Chapter 41, Division 26, Sec. 41-593 et. seq. of the Santa Ana Municipal Code (SAMC), is specifically subject to the standards and regulations contained in this plan for the express purpose of establishing land use regulations and standards. All other applicable chapters, articles and sections of the SAMC shall apply unless expressly stated or superseded by this ordinance. Section 2. Purpose The Specific Development Plan No. 82 (SD-82) for Templo Calvario consist of standards and regulations established for the express purpose of protecting the health, safety and general welfare of the people of the City of Santa Ana by promoting and enhancing the value of properties and encouraging orderly development of the property. Section 3. Uses Permitted she felIE)WORg uses are petted OR the C�ii-str�C� A parcel or building within" the Specific Development Plan No. 82 (SD- 82) shall be occupied by only the land uses allowed by this Section 3, and as permitted in created Zones, hereinafter referred to as Zone 1, Zone 2, and Zone 3 ("Zones"), as adopted and depicted in Attachment A. Zone 1 1. The permitted land uses within Zone 1 shall be as follows: (a) Administrative offices. (b) Surface parking lot for off-street parking purposes only, exclusive to Parcels 1, 2, and 4 of Parcel Map No. 84-886, as shown on a Map filed in Book 198, Pages 19-20 of Parcel Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of Orange County, California, and any future adjoining parcels that may form part of the Civic Center Business Park or its future successors. Ordinance No. NS-XXXX City Council 26 — 315 1714 5 (c) Private outdoor community area, to be accessible to all Zones, but shall not be used exclusivelv for school auraoses. includina but not limited to, outdoor play area, school children play area, nor for school recreational activities. Zone 2 2. The aermitted land uses within Zone 2 shall be as follows: (a) The compounding, processing or treatment of raw or previously used materials into a finished or semi -finished product, excluding those specified in SAMC section 41-489.5. (b) The manufacturing of products from raw or previously treated materials, excluding those specified in SAMC section 41-489.5. (c) The assembly of products from raw or previously treated materials, excluding those specified in SAMC section 41-489.5. (d) The packaging or distribution of previously prepared products or materials, excluding those specified in SAMC section 41-489.5. (f) Warehousing (h) Wholesale establishments where the primary trade is business- to- business sale of products, supplies and equipment. Ordinance No. NS-XXXX City Council 26 — 316 1714 5 OWN . M I.... KNOW 111111111P. INN-0- pp- r Ordinance No. NS-XXXX City Council 26 — 317 1714 5 1 I 1 r Ordinance No. NS-XXXX City Council 26 — 318 1714 5 -- - - - ��� 7e--* r _ -- Ordinance No. NS-XXXX City Council 26 — 319 1714 5 ■ rINS 3. The following uses are permitted when ancillary to any use permitted or permitted with the approval of a conditional use permit in Zone 2: (a) Administrative office occupying up to thirty (30) percent of the gross floor area. (b) Product sales or service uses occupying up to five (5) percent of the aross floor area. (c) Enclosed storage where the goods, materials or supplies stored are the property of the owner or operator of the building or structure occupying up to thirty (30) percent. 4. The following uses may be permitted in Zone 2 subject to the aaaroval of a conditional use permit in accordance with Section 41- 638 of the SAMC: (a) Principal industrial uses occupying less than seventy (70) percent of the gross floor area with the remainder of the floor area allocated to office use onlv. (b) Childcare facilities other than as permitted by section 41-472.1 of the SAMC. (c) Trade schools which provide instruction which requires the operation of heavy equipment or machinery normally associated with manufacturina operations such as woodworking or machine shops. (d) Industrial medical clinics which offer medical services by referral only and do not offer overnight stays. (e) Administrative office use ancillary to a permitted industrial use occupying more than thirty (30) percent of the gross floor area. Ordinance No. NS-XXXX City Council 26 — 320 1/ 2 15 7nnP A 5. The aermitted land uses within Zone 3 shall be as follows: (a) Schools and ancillary school uses. 6. The following uses are permitted when ancillary to any uses permitted or permitted with the approval of a conditional use permit in Zone 3: (a) Outdoor play area, ancillary to school uses. 7. The following uses may be permitted in Zone 3 subject to the approval of a conditional use permit in accordance with Section 41- 638 of the SAMC: (a) Churches and ancillary church uses. Section 4. Development Standards 1. Walls and Screening. Any equipment, whether on the roof, side of building or ground, shall be screened. The method of screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building in terms of materials, color, shape and size. 2. Landscaping Standards. All landscaped areas shall be irrigated using an automatic irrigation system. The project shall provide landscaping consistent with the existing landscape theme and existing improvements on -site. A six-inch raised concrete curb shall be required around all landscape planters unless approved by the City Landscape Associate. (a) A landscape area not less than 5 feet wide shall be maintained on the north (OCTA right-of-way) parking lot on Fairview Street. (b) All new landscape planters and landscaped areas shall meet the commercial landscape planter standards. (c) Vine pockets shall be provided along the north (OCTA right- of-way) block wall every 15 feet. 3. Architectural and Design Features. (a) Exterior Materials: Changes to the exterior materials and finishes shall be submitted to the Planning Division for review and approval. The materials and finishes shall be consistent with those found on the site. Ordinance No. NS-XXXX City Council 26 — 321 1/ 2 15 (b) Trash Enclosure: Trash enclosures and similar ancillary structures are to match the texture, materials and color palette of the proposed buildings. (c) Lighting Standards/Fixtures: A minimum of one -foot candle of light shall be provided throughout the parking area. Specifications of light standards/fixtures and photometrics plan shall be submitted to the Planning Division for approval. 4. School Operational Standards (a) A Traffic Plan shall be submitted for review and approval. The Plan shall include specifics on school bus drop-off and pick-up areas (limited to front of building), student drop-off and pick- up areas (limited to rear of building), and the driveways to be used for these functions. (b) A Safety Plan shall be submitted for review and approval. At a minimum, the Plan shall include provisions for student safety to the campus, during school operating hours, and safety exiting the campus. (c) DhysiGal Gt'�aG�tieSshall be limited to indeers only. No an i shall ho nidi i e d outside b iilidi�A rv�rcrctNa�rtie-S�r�uir-v�EerrcraEtccr-var..rra� minimum of 10 square feet of hySiGal ac ivitm y area —peg studeRtshall be nreyilJor! Physical education activities shall be limited to indoors and the outdoor designated gated area. Any changes to the designated outdoor play area shall be submitted to the Planning Division for review and approval. (d) Student enrollment for the school shall be capped at a maximum of 870 students. (e) A Parking Management Plan shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to the start of each school year. The plan shall be submitted to Planning Staff and the community association at least 15 days prior to the start of school. The Plan shall include provisions for parking during special events at the school. (f) The school shall submit an annual Special Events Program to Planning Staff and the community association at least 15 days prior to the start of the school year. The Program shall include provisions for notification of neighbors within SD-82, vehicle circulation, and parking during special events at the school. Ordinance No. NS-XXXX City Council 26 — 322 1/ 15 (g) Schools are subject to periodic review by the Planning Division to ensure compliance with the school; Operational Standards. Failure to comply with the Operational Standards may result in a review by the Planning Commission for further action. 5. Property Maintenance. (a) Graffiti: All graffiti shall be removed from the premises within 24 hours of discovery and/or notification of graffiti on the premises. (b) Parking Lot/Drive Aisles: Parking and driveway areas located on the parcels shall be kept in a good and clean condition. Standards maintenance and repairs of paved surfaces shall be conducted on a regular basis. The normal cleaning and removal of refuse and trash shall occur on the premises. (c) Landscaping: All landscaping shall be maintained at all times. Any dead or missing landscaping shall be replaced in a timely manner_ Section 5. Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Reciprocal Parking and Access Agreements (a) The CC&Rs governing the subject properties shall be refined and submitted to the City prior to permit issuance of any site improvements, included but not limited to the followina: I. Square footage addition to any of the existing buildings II. Fences III. Storaae sheds IV. Landscape planters (b) A copy of a recorded and executed reciprocal parking and access agreement shall be provided to the Planning and Building Agency (PBA), prior to permit issuance of any site improvements as listed in Section 5 (a). The reciprocal parking and access agreement shall include language for reciprocal parking and access among legal Parcels 1, 2, and 4, as shown on Parcel Map No. 84-886, as shown on a Map filed in Book 198, Pages 19-20 of Parcel Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of Orange County, California. (c) Alternative to the requirements in Section 5(b), an equivalent action/document can be provided to the PBA ensuring that the subject properties meet all required off-street parking and access requirements. Ordinance No. NS-XXXX City Council 26 — 323 1/ 2 15 Section 5. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby declares that it would have adopted this ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions be declared invalid or unconstitutional. Section 6. The Clerk of the Council shall certify the adoption of this ordinance and shall cause the same to be published as required by law. ADOPTED this day of , 2023. Valerie Amezcua Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: Sonia R. Carvalho City Attorney By: 1 I l ;k� Jc 3e Montoya Assistant City Attorney AYES: Councilmembers NOES: Councilmembers ABSTAIN: Councilmembers NOT PRESENT: Councilmembers Ordinance No. NS-XXXX City Council 26 — 324 1/ 15 CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY I, Jennifer L. Hall, City Clerk, do hereby attest to and certify the attached Ordinance No. NS- XXXX to be the original ordinance adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on , 2023 and that said ordinance was published in accordance with the Charter of the City of Santa Ana. Date: City Clerk City of Santa Ana Ordinance No. NS-XXXX City Council 26 — 325 1/ 2 15 0 I NFL iZs n K City City Council 26 — 326 1 /16/2024 11/8/23, 6:05 PM coning Zoned — General Agri cul[u ral Community Cam mercial Lcm m u nity Cam mercial -Museum ❑istrict ■ General Commercial ■ Planned Shopping Center ■ Arterial Ca m mercial ■ Commercial Residential ■ South Main Street Commercial District Govemment Center . Light Industrial ■ Heaoy Industrial ■ Open Space land M etro East Overlay Zone ■ Pmtessional Single -Family Residence ■ Two -Family Residence ■ Multiple -Family Residence ■ Suburban Apartment ■ Residential -Estate ■ Specific Development No I ■ Specific Development No- It ■ Specific Development No- 12 ■ Specific Development No- 13 ■ Specific Development No- 15 ■ Specific Development No 16 ■ Specific Development No- 17 ■ Specific Development No- 18 ■ Specific Development No- 19 ■ Specific Development No- 2 ■ Specific Development No- 20 ■ Specific Development No- 21 ■ Specific Development No- 25 ■ Specific Development No- 26 ■ Specific Development No- 27 ■ Specific Development No- 31 ■ Specific Development No- 32 ■ Specific Development No- 34 ■ Specific Development No- 35 ■ Specific Development No- 36 ■ Specific Development No- 38 ■ Specific Development No 39 ■ Specific Development No-4 ■ Specific Development No-40 ■ Specific Development No-41 ■ Specific Development No-42 ■ Specific Development No_43 ■ Specific Development No-44 ■ Specific Development No-46 ■ Specific Development No-48 ■ Specific Development No-49 `q City Council 26 — 327 n 7n?4 ninitAi Man PT71'V UL�F [2dl iphtc racarvar1 https://apps.spatialstream.com/landvision/production/CurrentBuild/Html/printpreview.html / I AA No. 2023-04 and ZOA No. 2023-03 601 N. Fairview Street R1 m- WOW `"'7 r O R1 1 -I c2W Tr 1112 iiiii R1 - - R2 lid R1 �s t uF R2 r FI iiak4r:lr.r� F: R.1 R1 R2 D 8 mi rf N11. JJI �Li1:tJ 15 M 1 '� N11 r IW.I - rt it dt r� �-- � . Wiffliam N 400 feet Exhibit 3 - Vicinity Zoning and Aerial Map 1/2 11/8/23, 6:05 PM City Council 26 — 328 1 /16/2024 https://apps.spatialstream.com/1andvision/production/CurrentBuiId/HtmI/printpreview.htm1 2/2 _ _ ± a _ , �.��'�►�� w s •yy !.` �• e ��:a � '`era .. ..__ r __ --` � - - }�• ' � * ._ r t-;V ��bt tltl ■■ �, Frt#�� � �_: yh }��� ■■ E�� ■ 1��1Ji f�!1� /i _ VISTA CHARTERTENANT SCHOOL PHASE IV 601 N FAIRVIEW, SANTA ANA, CA 92703 VISTA HERITAGE GLOBAL ACADEMY 1 J� Ij7 ! l DRAWING INDEX PROJECT DIRECTORY BHT. NO. DESCRIPTION D.E,.IFLOPER RED HOOK CAPITAL PARTNERS �..... NSTA HERITAGE GLOBAL ACADEMY ARCHITECT STUDIO W Pf2CHITECTS CIV& ENGINEER KPFF LANDSCAPE= ARCHITECT MBLA LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE. INC. SURVEY ENGINEER PROJECT DATA 11°"!PlA4��SaEI. .. VICINITY MAP T ' r.nr'E: r'Yii,xN •r�� `4('(-i 'K� PROJECT NARRATIVE PROJECT SCOPE OF WORK CODES AND REGULATIONS .aaccx�.® .a.<w w..., ..°..° I" STUDIO W ARCHITECTS s .0 ,...,. �., 0�,<Ll VISTA HERITAGE GLOBAL ACADEMY M IYSTN STREET SANTA ANA, CA 92703 CONDMONAL USE PERMIT VISTA CHARTER SCHOOL PHASE IV 601 N FAFmrw. SANTA ANA, CA 02703 COVER SHEET A0.1 City Council zo — 41 POLICE DEPARTMENT NOTES: N, STUDIO W ARCHITECTS ! : n. hm- -A-om.wn 0 4.'�W 0 wE�0LN1 VISTA HERITAGE GLOBAL ACADEMY 2609 W 5TH STREET SANTA ANA, CA 92700 CowmoNAE USE PERWT VISTA CHARTER SCHOOL PHASE N 601 N FAIFW W SANTA ANA. CA 971W POLICE DEPARTMENT NOTES mu A0.7 mow. ae. City Council POLICE DEPARTMENT NOTES (CONT.) : :u.rou we�wsxn+se s+wa BURGLAR BAR PACKAGE suwwe sw sass sEc�. I" STUDIO W ARCHITECTS o' M1 yw 4 nEl NAM VISTA HERITAGE GLOBAL ACADEMY 2W9 W-TH STREET SANTA ANA. CA 92703 CMWIONAL USE PEAW VISTA CHARTER SCHOOL PHASEIV 901 N GAIWEW, SAVA ANA, CA 92703 POLICE DEPARTMENT NOTES d. +ww..oa�e. n.wgr+.mo. a A0,8 A 49 y / t.. 2 y ..rrrr..•...■r..................................................■.= ■ ■ cars i ■ .rr as ,� :8{ i Y 11 .', (tom' ,d 6^ M ■ Y ■ �, X X _ r.t. ......... ...................f.. r. . R A QdARGED GRADING KAM uc. r.rs r A EGEND' a v� .�• . nn ` 9L roan Is -- i y '� �(�Ay LMLITY CONSTRUCTION NOTES. 'Y S1bfY ■.■I FA • � 11)G 8 MO SAS FlII R/ILIa tl1Y Q SWIA MM O6 �� •••• ' � •••�♦• t ®,ta'IS' OYpI r.+fM O110F5C Gml ■YM 1F1Pn •• ■!' III;/�� ®Xr.O .rwwror ..omw.rc +ur.egl WCM 11 . � ♦ ,� ••.vae - ®M3 .S.rlEd �S-r!W ML�MIgI 6WEW. 41 Ulm II Jw ---------------------- ir !1 M . ram, 0. �i n ■j w� 0. Ofl�Naltlu RY!! , W� Ix _ �i �•\ ,7I w� t Wt. Y r ) PU1N J 0 0 2 U [� > R w LU F— Cn s Q (r Q am a Q Z LL Zm U U) (� Isl.lcwr+_ �e 6RYM7! a.r. er T. �s sv■nrleo PRELIMINARY GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN SHEET C1.30 City Council 26 — 333 1/16/2024 CUY OF SANTA ANA pMC3UIC rMJOO G3KS G^QQ[EKC1w PROJECT DP NO.2023-1Q MID NO. 2023-180301 • VISTA HERITAGE GLOBAL ACADEMY EXPANSION 601 N FAIRVIEW ST SANTA ANA, 92703 CN TOR PVBLIC ORIts PERMITTEDf (]ENERA! NOTES' WORNORK ON WAIER OISTRIBJ1I0N SvSTCY- WAT M[ KA[d sIW1 E mta1RCISa M RTpLYiCl NIF M NXRelh6 N TK t [g6i4C AMI wsiwtAla IA Al w�tF d6LA� VWAR Ys YIYI] E M ILNIIpMIrE YIIM F d/AVRA sMOIIp SISOIGA,YI6 IaA rtJR1K NLllla CCM]IAVCMl1 fCAfM NmOFI .M slwtm+N1 swnw PRVAsoIs scam n .rn IWR sst M M on o swu AM IK Gh UI Scala Arw srwgRm ISlrrs WM n Ids. wmR ,M surgNp i.ttls AIFMI. _P'ma]cllatl AFo MsrNumN a sl+Ex Alma Arm APMJRIiWNas sNtl ooNUA b Tw rK AIAAW 1� Wx]s ASTroaIUA�m. wrav sxcru,ots Mo M n.]ws srtorwoa rA cast Web I i 1 ] mN,ACmI Slue LORY EM nwano MAx IIM E]tA m _�� �- ]MINI.SWU-.rMGOr?MIDCCIAENR/IILO Sl POr fLPiS WL wo4Ael[ tl M elelC Rx�t4 > caxanpulau er vnx w+c ro .vnmwlRcs slwl oar E xnFnMe ar [wu[o L CawRA Ltl1TA1CICn5 MrF A WtA r:YlaIRM CdA1MCICR A OP L]. ItYM- I ■frM -."TER ."TER IAK SIWfn' IG a nALID. YL WrMt IIp Wirt BM EPY[z uG OQ�f% ], xr] rEMhl. OR[rl Irtyr Crn P - - - R[Y - 9MSIW - mail E ApXISRp BI M fIA¢aPLAWA m rrAxr tlAIG[ R.S 6 ro E me owoA ,p RAIx SEA arAr As . MRA INSrABJIOR arrM,gl sFAI tl N[aAm m arLAAR M rnrs Mm vi � w [ I�ii _ ■IE•1 Cge5bR1NM M .AiFW l AU9AlF (.Ll xKElrt MC[IRI[S @gKtA[K q PYIIIAIIIn NY[R [ fAMR]fQ M,fI[S ¢I [VI9 tl All K EARWAY. PMOIDR SMLL tl CV WILD MM KKIMId TrNF R lIIAaPIIM T AIMiPIYSIPHJip ar[M1aR SN1ll 9iVl] ►YLA YA1Q Qf mLMA CIR1C1ExE J I� A9x[Ar TIMsa la Pr 6NSG115 PFA SgXN YNip) wRR Sltlfl PrLIARt tA6 ELA ¢YIN. NL !. PM]R ,0 M SLM[ q [AM,AJCIOa M ChARKial IIxAt . j Y.¢ WAI R Yn INauRn fal 0.6rMCRM q NL. SR[C3 R .RLrf1IG R ENbRl. SMiR. AMWOw 7AVNLCINAI Mq Ilvv.F Ww' rFA M ¢n R SW,. w: tt9ra 6tltuas 4o nworo wu:.ws �1 i�� I , I ,� „ __ fiC s IrArIaF r RwIA AI¢rrc [n ET.n[A [R.rAr to REI art N Amc svT14a It lJN[ WECRa n M CAY fX(w.FA N A.. KKr s ANa AMFAI,[]ANAAs sNAll E gRNf.Crm rlE 16M M [Ws sd�urs. vad ceoaz, IAION Is ISMNlLIxla Ta M arcs MNu rr LOCATION MA f� A ruR M XRPRII SNAL IIIbtYN Mon M M Srx[F, ELA FYNSIN Subtle[ uA1 M]1RNlAW sri}01 pSK[G1d 16rML RSLLis 51N[L E SWANm m M MTp �isaIARES nSM rcA x[euN rp 4to Axo YPIIUA[ rtApl M rnve,R4G la M Cx]'s wRR N (loi ro roALLI rAtsKn ut]N a M [l1Aa AT Ml tuns rFY[ 11LYA'W 'tff stall d rE I1,N6 nY Ar ]II. 4:a'IblArt NGAR EgMm n M tlN CM%[fR 'Iweuld sxnw SPEpAE NOTES ] l! IIWMPfrty M eA5[ SA NA PImYIW.[ SLfLPKC. R IK IQS,iAI lrii,lM 6 `• MTtAi 1 MSIm NAN]IMAA EVSM9�l/IC 1C5>m�.,E]W® fW ] hC11a r[Y M,LN Wry GMt E - f0 sRA4 a Rn NWf- 1 FN SNfI]FND NW,K IYArA[RpA I' Rtll E OFMEO M 5'.IBLW4 a rLLdC. M rgt(NANL RpI6Art Ina WIRl E IxlatlpFa • EGIt515 W LM GOw M tllfR dSTItluIYM Tr51r51 I0A KiR PI 6ntA MAOIIS SHai E cRomNielm yFM IK µRA 4sEARs WIzpA STfi M [f]bT ] RpIS M AOrtMJ +rNR'.ro. M MIIINrR (/'car A M /ollww'c IrwFS, ao ML tlrr Nva. IIN tl � i[90ea[ ry i`tw [rlmKp ] tnaNN M aPn K.l M orgRrA Ma T1faAE 4JIN rRaAes n n AfAdf lACCZs ILaYrRN A SCNMIAN MO NASNL d [m M]iSLroR A. oR,omis Wrzcrtu n M Pxgvscc swT OONF sFNL E MOKwa r rmxw lalrRrcrw ESA.I. ml®Auf,� W.nAM Ay cam MACIA ..N AVRc �RACF v.>eb .Io ,ArEl[ Ao.. wa IACAWJE I.TIK[[ AWAs MR ran. call sYIIEi WNI]WL a set. tl 'AFA4 M NYE R eRif SELia tx e Fnws M Fv]rrA n IK sroFrxrna A- M On d WA IIN w AESLIACCA olAs['M CMirgl CVYGrtRi . cnIFILT[ vAnaLNM Or fixNl W fiXEtr wsh 1 M mraM(. p ♦I I¢K Sver. Irrt r W9rM]MM ]WpYpL I[C4WYE SiAAA]T[ M M]CMRI >R RM SLRIq[ Aarllls8 M T xp,]IiE .Ar MRRMSf IIrl1C0 51RriC T M a1S ONWrtIR mYAc 11A16 can F AE9VVRAi r RAM% AID 15a1/JiPI Y CaaRRCxRI ieR ,LSlK tl AIIr 011p P.lµ'a5[i ] q ATµreA4 WSI T M[ pM1 I cwM Ar t µlry Atv.1 AIW SFRACR W 1V E I!'IwtN n M aMTaltll /rl{x M CUE IIE O.TW a HEI F,�ALMPRY IN !aR � Slp�' 1rtliA, ]I.rt raN1 Ica .]raw r MOT [II tlWpR p cvlyM;[Iw MR EiINE rK L[Y IMYII M K AAiAtA4 a uY aAl]KI wu elwwlr CY'[I[o wllliq PP/n�IL I �St➢Ry+�R WE�IIOr N s M tprMl[NW scat �RAa(. rtLw,A[t Ito/oN 4.ouR w oosiNw SWiRrSM AI ll.-rl-]]Y IO KIYIIO[ YIKYArC iqe Mix SrS,EY rtllM n M Pn li YW,MNa WIFR 5[IMZ LMi E M EYtlEIWM1 q IK WIIWelalr I11P rwr f]M1a6n MSIi �� BRA Ml IMGIId snR14 e�ulfS, nYNA 44R0 Ar.1ROfAR w M,E M x M Am'IOOI SpLL EAarJJ[ UR EA>5'NL 11R[C u1lrR5 LOuriD M . E[ACAi[a xAFi-Q-MT. GNJA MW IW 111 rMRls II[,IdD IY PRAIM1IL ,YANuvn s[rtMA tA51 ✓3l AMIpRp tl M MRw ESaW.6 t1nt90F 1K M,f11 911Ia E iwi raA axP.x iM1 ALCaIYYAE Atln L,Ar[ fr �K1 MRw� �NIOor�iviu�n� m n[ �NrOpN 15 KWIN N Itl CAr. CAIILMIA MI01 tl6IXlfl] (.'MIR2 8]Ir10 I]'tAIe1 INxw.r4 M,p txoGMY (ptl) p WAn uulM¢ n Rl N4R PgS91G5. u A MW VClrf IXCiILL ORµ MN rO110 01 fvw Mlp[i0A b 10 R,A, bR. 1] rNR E AKlgt[p AiAI MRR ltq.o d IrwrA ] .rmtaA RLGi AL.VINSa rM iPPAmSP uffFtµF WAr4L U, bE 4LOfMf 4 10 f]ofY MO P[RW 14 E a5[fa Iql N6RRlAFah L1 IMpFWIpNp NN]n uR5 MR SAw uiun WIS AP[ d M nI A?A(I.YM HMIs MO rF[w laGrpa IAE C[NIrN b M fAl1IK Axp fMN.ip1 9SlON rYCe fNTM r]IALLCA ICSTL6 Mr IaIIV[0. mMACI iK Ml[x ESIXIQS M®I K JK-Ml-1]M. JILT rA [IP[M[ ], CLWILCFa R LtY94tl[ Iqi ANi AIAADC p RM4e AIw S%[I pp�KNC rGff M M0� ru 6anc nac Sn![r M AIM,E LMyNfR Mla .IMMa 1K a0. b �] r MIFrt AAwA 9NY E IRMA C-Rm NC, Yt sr ¢a'r[i NAtr I'.[ W arIRR wPt Iw'trw.s Ea1Nx vtna u[W. AtUiTlo�i IrA .�It• MsuMos a'm 4AY ap pR1yAiE ENGINEERS N0710E TO CONTRACTORS I A:G ]E1MA CiNY][<RYa WR le E CRa1RiLWa rM, fJlA W V5 IO IK vxaP[Rn aK I,N KMr R q M [slr rI1X IIIE IaGilaM tl lKw CAMIC[Rarr .Alt Sf'NCR WAA] AA[ f [ MTfll II/Aa SINII 1111A R' YAYIMY CgAA m fN6Kil lANC InT TAW MI FAb, I,4 RINMRIrpA To N caI[EFriD ql [AM III, 4glrtFs ATIJr4 NIGY M WAt[R IE9PMCFS 9NeIJM. Is caax.LmF m tLArr xrrF wa Loc[isM q Au I]ru,Ns xaol m I.Ercwtr.. I � PuB.0 NLIEA f SrICYI AITIlCI sYxrllfaL KCWR f]ew sAll E KWP6wIF d tau�W A[ INN] KRCPIc Nlav Ar0 /a ALAI oAlMrx d vro t] 4[ [tA Awln slAtt E Ailsrc IA:r w.rx mrNrsml nrls a rraxs Is RpMT( MR9 APHMI[wMC1s SaG 4 WIG/IA PNLTLMfAA n[ Ix9RYl15 .la 4M-0PP[s. Fq siMlR+o-trorsRYcna r nE an]tci� rM[ wMwcra s�iYlc vcoix .4 ETepL VM1 W S YI[LYMG 'b AM1 NO eliY iK [lMrd I] r slwA E M ALSPar6YAr IN M Yvd mm4clu to [aosE M. u Pum ro M `'"` � F""�� ""'� a IatAorA Ir sec INuh uNa ASTNq sLRul AM ro I.NL IK [II(AIRr No Luv�Rax uMNo AARx to ARr sLtlA nwrts a AVIAWL wlY.mo.r rxsrn .0 IMAYITIKIiYa Mn s�cowlwKroxs xlFaRrc wn AVµ acRll aF eNllc NRxAYN. C ig( PxORc001.d [ylr[ri qp Ill REiARn p MST caws sIAJ mlael ,Kw PNEMIIars so ,MI al ]VlOrtfs MII Pxpllp[E I svF Al[,( Ip fMll Mp M 0.RC s Ir n s,[v. tl M EsrsrsEn. a ,K mnA1GTa ro NAsc Iu Rort Y[ Issr,Nas n Mt ;ROI rAaltcnn Au wxtNcials can suNal]R.c]os v.N] rn.rtr .nM M 'OLxIIVARu1N NwAlus rmxrm rFLox m AAr AwY rwu xs YIAr rw. IAN IILVAtv6 MN m E I1 ro AM an aA swN= LV] w AA] Astluss gIA]VT IR .IE.v[ AxMxtG rAsrc .sEsroc IrYp ,as Ave xr m wcr Art call mTn wn FIMM IR¢aAlorts• q ,K J.s orwrtNt r:ounwr[wm srir�t'[mw°s su..rrtn rA +K uh nmll ro Av IAMc Pwxrtrrt owne�'nPn n°�etnsiMowl nrw r.MQctvies, wroxl. xwliKRona own.s M�a :ml Ms. is au [wxfRwaus sYsxr Arm car em-.xx-nn N It,u'I ,e Fouls fRlo RORMc MrsP RAaA le oo Far rw IxmMe WFR NRFMn M rEErrrL a . LYIRFN Mtn Nsx[eme, rwES51N,L >m lAY MRYRmrt A Is�FA[ )Ion ruse :'w.°:.N p AAT Yf.WAIRN R111.11 Mx pIWGL M MRYRAI M SmMR (A MW rJ10FM411a11M VWAr 1AC ,APWIra Af[K M RN NKSSN0. IAA [EAKKa LAVER Ityq[Ipp Elalw sNWI]a !tG'I'MG LWE s]O tt'tpYwCl n M GdI,NK]aR a Ill' ]IWCMIP/[1JMS I/ VS[ Ml LtPIxfrLFA 0.P rt1MILA[ FARS M PCC INAaT10KINllE I/ lY4A Al'IYIW[E Allt rp OCM IM,r. UY AC00]O PYRMGS aw wnAP wO wIM r1AeAH MI[ e¢Mxm m Wo ALIIMm F M [Ms A®R'ICrt- SNart Au frpy pwKfs p+ 4[(I!a LP.AAIIaf rr(tl]4M4t. 14 InIIMc1P PwLL ASSYII SR.i W CUNLi[ R[sPaµRA1n Idl 'pB 9R CoulRl6 plerL IK [auFY q Il MT PFIANIUIr 61mL4Ax[ a SAI[n S+iA (NRIm d M A1Ma ALO W161EA1D IEQ96M n A IR(NOI AWJLy s1Rt E tLL]IP WM AMs1RN IAo tl toF-SAq eil�Oif srM�r� 4PwRwi11 slWt .rMtr (penWWSlr 4Y APr E M [IR' St1NA E NauLLla F M tlrt11YAA Ar Aa lbe, la M CFr ]1 Ma P1MY M,EA f.h RNS Ax[ IOURa d FY.AII Pxe1FAh. eAWKp eq,YKns w la E Wr[D m 1eILN'A +aeaK Fans Ave 1FY M LSMrRKrf♦I 5114 fRRM), WNa M MNlpl, to 411Rr SIeYRiLp ,a Cin FNI Y'PxgYt PMM b A NRNI tlua rSWD. NNRWWS. ND rlrrre]L Mo iFf CRY TF SW IA MM +NMESS fR]II MII ArO AlA AWeln, RI/I. G AULfia, F WgMG. ww Ap LLICIIEAt f/RY sY OatpNl s TI'fED IpR SIR] YMIA xN 3AtYliat5 i,R IK II ALL RCSGLD M]FA MgAL,s E0.S EVRw M4 ANxwAI'l fxiM M IrITA KSOYILLS CRR1M 10K t5'6111Y .II\•] GA rRf., 1K 41[ E¢aN45 ¢ ,F[�OA.MEI• fRVI.IL MAPORD SARSi 11Gt115 IIE RI E 4R n M wxs,Mcelow ASN[noA AT ]K-w-]a1. ATIfA x['V 11][AI 4 FM KEN NMpRP fMl A5 SIINrN d I,E Y/xO.1.wt 11IAS n 1K ]] NU WmIytMA ur-ft ISpi I` []IotRLx ql M CA,T P sAWA AFr. Aft[1VFR/IaeMPgr. Nq ,RMR,N30M190 M Clh 01® A®A-IAOCUt➢ Ali ] S CFwlq SIIfFI. PR(]t A TILE V M tlUsFAY 5 ERINL AI nA-w]-Jf]0 Ydli f► BJCeID'eri 1]t Ix C1I.WP MD eusl LarxMA M. MIIA IIM f11rNN5 9KL tl IlA1Q a[ KLFAFCK ]IAS SLY, IO NIRtr-pi ]erA nVANS I x aA twaAlA CpnRN iFN R{r rIAA A111N lYlAl M (:P]tP.A[Tpl SIUY1 LAMP M YOA(e]R PGIr M6 Rxf rICY M.VN Ex.s AI M rAp all Mp MYRC] TMSny ArF9+F](NR ILR ECIICN I-x R M ffNYPYRy St[LiR'Ard r(yl ILSN: ArWs OSFSRLIbF N1dm ]! CgIR]Klga ]IurLL 191 +[Aas lR <AixPi fbNb WIIiM.'I _ A[]p1Y35 [rnfeFMRl I AT tall AM ABYLrir M]CR ACIOI MTlt.110F AFA•�EirIFM ro PfYMaA etmA.E 10aATxF AIY OV 1 W YSML w�ls (rws uc � ttJfrCK MiFA. ldtlt SIRIYi uaN. Ap SMc M4 iwS NO 1Wr rK I]IYYf JYt[R@ MMOt rl tty- �1£YA(r rlutlAlor mII.MA W ellm fAMM Ass Ill ]0 La1RKl tEE YCrYR SLR'flTred, 11.-pt]-]Slr epra x15iM116 MM RIIS I.-rr-SSA IYF [NISlMa If[RA TIQMS oxrAi �n P .Mopgp{x cN [Klf1T ]r Po CWrAw A P[EAI m ACCCSS MRR RqY . I/a MIRlV11. mvrlcr M aTl Twn N x wsrAllA,YA q A[rt MRA A[1P sPMR L'ARI SraN 9WL E PJI[ wlp x51.WIMM p rt'e CW 'AM LTiDfF a rri� ra,PAn� us IR.M9E0 M I'RpVYa (qW rArp[ In srwrc Q M m[IA6, �•'jA�L�- Yam' � •�IZr f1VL (inl-li.l S]LA. N FIANF am REVISIONS I REFERENCES VICINITY MA [car Ta sCAI[) All • Am i.. City 1 I PROJECT DIRECTORY TRE AOUFESS. '1�wRwlftls sWilrt� iwA�u f3]I�iJ i r[iJiWra LxA.I OWNER'. CN !N 39fa tlI1IL1 ,qn PKKaO-Tmg1 SPpW19,V PATP 1.[wh rdlM.S. LLf r��pp� MAII¢, u 3A6A ]prl.. SIR[ .]Ip M7r7 [GK R,MG (lfJAffAS LGIFCr MWY chr.R i a KMOWI nFRR mrt. Rloxr ] ns�ms PESCiN TAN ASSESSOR PARCEL NO. F4 W9„K� .�_ptl-a LCMKT L FLOM NOTE' naive raN x <OKuMsKc]A Itooa �tA1Mm AAY Y xw<L FA tlWEV]sN car wl� IAaTANA 9A515 OF BEARIr]G5� Mvs EAANns tl nn srAIAT a IARM[rt sRRTr. 9YIa North 'II' F]ar x[R �wS.t! 1WP Fa. µ-Ae4 Px]u(fi AW AOUc i MAS 14 MIa A uT.ITY SM CES. µ]LA- aln p YA,A IIM C41G111 II.-Mr- fi[SR SKM �cGWYn MRRI( Yi Ml-SJep LLL<,IICI,v safes UKM MaYR ppyps � rv�/mILLMAi/MWK: wwarAt rro ]�i esai-mi AR aAAA4A LPII]I• KE AIIMmR RALIN IN-!1!-Noll SHEET INDEX xR4 Mfll SPAIWENT M WMK: AIRLVN MY Rf[aN51RLLNM N fvL,.lG aNnRn NFxIx1rT0 Br _ - EMT M]EK AVAN$ IYAECmx prl( 'IIVG tl90eRq ANW(LA _ LRIVIIbM $BM1MTLB AIBR T-BEBEFWORKYOU ING 0OICAY3 ORE NOTICE TO CONTRACTOR �MApepYMlwxpJ�.S:p/er Au fra nv �t AMAKaGM[ri MA�A..�C�At FI��i} ARnv ro tnl.nrac r.uw.FM STREET IMPROVEMENTS VALLEY VISTA CHARTCR SCHOOL W N. FAIRVIEW STREET. SANTA ANA 97703 SANTA AN City Council 26 - 334 1/16/2024 GMEWI Was Pat Puux 1110RR5 PERI[Erm YrORH On SEWCR M ECTION SYSTM I. W6IWCTOI w 111rWUT1R OY ALL 5[1kA w>K /r0. rPPU1m vM3 AWL 1e n AgpgAq wR1 rvF CI[Y R suns uF awnvm R uo S IEUFYATh6, — W s1aRlwm Tlw1 K 6LAT. Wdn eft. AVO NSrAtwcN v SIP]! WAS Ant YREETUIf[.S SWIL mrOa1 ro M nWow sP[�tP TEfs rm sae Kaaa C0,7,7 fir, L012 "IIR1L ). Iri6TIDC1[TI or SrPG WIS al0 APTRIbwC(9 9UlL C.l e[ Pnsoie.n b ww./a LT[TNCrOIE Intl A vAw 6S[OPW COIOAACIOR A G W Ut[RY' E Au R[YAY m�TKunm S[TTn w.v¢ APp APRgaRw�s AIML i[STO n .bt—,Oe InK SnM)A® SPCC11CAlI0NL 1w IU. N[wr Cd41EOL3FD w" .a Ia10LK5 4O Y,lldu Tar f PC wo m w OF SERSl1 LWSEO B — 1[aTTOR Tl.sly P • 1wvAW Asswaela SWA¢ CLTPA5E5 Inlae0) [sm w T EuB Ro wco swmLrlLn n A omal rce.1T TIE nRFn RR0.AF5 a'11id1 rLF RC1FT oD F%1L M@WQ nr .ww +. Au sLmT rws arvL ff wwm Lux IF[ lw) rFF aR PA: 91-:1 PIE PLL nnnL /V! Ra1tlKs R[oAe SY4O.a RLgIR II0 MHpAI iPDY IN! YAEA M.SOfWV.s [n6D11. i neDo1 gA1[S Swll � FYAX '[Rrl PN91fE%r ,IIO 91I1L E IIfAI 906 � rnn])cm1 ro !m[T ®tx +R1 wcual a Alt vnmis PROR T> TILA1i,G ), vBw Insx mes ir*Acs AIE row" w PB w I rn�mn, r Rwn [aaww nE m e[ went" rs an i[i IPPIY.Wa PTNI T A AE— 104 6A1M ! rNLL Y[L4II110E MILL IEI =B 1Nll OnIfYA 1L- 01An[s u.nAn .10 nc aL town AiE 1orE,aT m.vT rLfFYise 8T nl 4!Y! a6A[GiaR 9bi iL 3tIO PW�4s d acam Ti11MS I. 1il 5[YG f¢PMB 9WL 1F AmarlPlTwm ow s1NLd SRIl OQBL 1wdD MUKlw.s DEMOXION MO CONSTRUCTION QUWIMES: ABRRE43FTpN$� miR xCL ni.R ms'mi rRl1 w,T 011ue1:N LT Yi31 Ltd P4 q c6[ as r6[ eA Oj Cw31Wa C%QwK ORMNRW7r [ xrr Crr sc, tttz u [ cwE �ORa w'rRi utt im k]'i ma Q�,• m auRpin 1/. nn sonar-..+ RfIpYF F1o1TwC 01M'MY APP10M. G [ C01L fdllrhl[ 5= YR[ FOURL LTr6iw.CT PCC ARRY1[ Pa [nT 51E tla. GiSE S -Y. S! L O MIS M m SOOT MK ouq L10 aYlgaT P' r l0 !• O K PIx[14M1 IAOM [OC(a ST 1.aT W m d LILY W!{S1F Wo 11[VAMY sswx 5S swnAm ixa uwRwS VKNYf SOEn M— lln5 m GIRB lIM ILL ry rlxLrRaoL Rullmon rr rww�1K r ate [TLC,-- [ucnr.,L r,w,a TO — [wSTYq m STATICIL X EL m m5T. [IW- aylN O UlalYr TPt1g1 PFR QTY S10. Im V T IN RN: OatWlimn LTIML111M R 10P lX CVF'B Lvlmlucr r barn StNQ 11[nl !i!• rT[K vE1 swan wT NL lal ra EIlGOTR vAirn IETm m N In T In —WR w at mo to Ts TLLU109 1zuTx vwll wsTAlLm P my ruaf! n1[R vtm[ssd a rnR aam r. [ n [ *[ wLx 158 ,zw�x sKRrl aln a°/4.GTp1 .am salrpl d r¢s tgnACl rIL Pr[T RE54B.SS pa6glr AT 714•MT•1Im ral AST[STL1e[ WL4EIn n NE wA11e lw frPC RESTaWER PLR SiNOLTO PIAK M]. 111R m O4[06 Wlr RII11R N ]FlLv61pN norT. I[W w>Qn RLTnK _ R eon NY PAS![ HI MALT 11Am.1R TW MNEO WE PFE IOL 1mtl1W iIQ ITS • PO IOC Pdn OF WMLOYIOK o1[R RF1W IF POSE Id0Yd1 v4aL Ary R"ER t.:"4 PTc PIRRMT a1F)11 cT]C10.1[ my PKSRWE aal Wow GENERAL NOTES REVISIONS L ALL •vPx hlµ0l BE Od[ W aLCO1DMa WN TE'IlMt no m MFR IO[S rKT WUR • KS CdYSnlUCTd` PRdIU1CaTLn 11 IU[ ]o] FlNTP, OF 19rIT1Op CALFOO[A LHAViER A TIE ARV A AGGC .GNT ilrT CoiNTRE N�f[W nTT[RRT TD AS THE 41AM1In0 SPECI1fAi1(114 a41 tlM tl SAa la ARa 9fAxnA® Gills s sFonpndS (UMA55 EE`Em N[v K OTfEKw5L OR N IIQ CVL FRONAw15 iCT T[S PK0.ELIL I TE [iaST01r[ rv10 LXOA DrAAT mpuft l o UMvv ay. SnryCNR[ sRew1 LM TnCA PLANS ME OBTANEI 1r • SIPPCHW AVMARE iAC090S X0 CERT11N— IL YW AS TO 1EC —I On iRORdgIF55 a TO'SE IEOO"S AFinOYaL OI TM5 PW, frT 111C OTv d San1A ANA ptts Rot c 1W. AN [i0a1[NR IR—Ei51ORi Q IRK tRQeulrm W- OR 91 TPYCTAC IMWN 111E Lr a ins PN WCCT. IT - THE RCSPOISRETY Q 1XE CS111IIAClOP TD V(A5T MC LOCAIIGV II Ill EESORO UR 0 U1RlTE94W[B�, I01N—. OrIEA .L SL 11F CLTnRACiOA WISL N011rT UNOrAtllgw. 9[AAlCf ALOIT AIt) " R s &'JOIE Mr FacAVAnRt A 11A.g LTRSiwIC1R1. 10ONOIi�[tAt�T�m [MY *dOn2lL 0A54 iNCOfoYaTM PRO'AO[aRpgTWTJ(A �n 6 SiWTA 1A[�555RY V cOmnA.Cird $HALL MU AS PA Oi MR Eb9..[ NVO LIS]n f� M'Y iIRHE1CAS NAS rSCFil�aRY 0 M w II' Plirlll p n{ ORAA:YGS REFERENCES Wn w�Exi�v NnF On .,m e CM 1G J Parn[RT .• IvlROi suw*r arnuu. B CROSS SECTION ATDR wt a R,S. N M r431 - N I1�.7.T PiF a]1 I [tPBA Wnu 10 SG[TALK I i u• PA+MRI IIAGOIr .._ _ nr /—a', TW SCAL CROSS SECTION I R ♦ K , - rT I1.aAY; m - . w•f UvdoiB d=Aln .alnonTT Fr T1BEFEYG) DA 010 ...I a+..>. NOTICE TO CONTRACTOR orrwT +nmuc ■oaa 1NtEGio1 iArcA REswrcl RARwIx aT[ �""Y � ° uT�ol/m.�"'..v°ioim ,ems A urL AI[nT ndTr <.rl. nl AF,r sr t.o rowwo Alga /anT r"L"o°�o.Iwaw FlCAw1w. eLn�! STREET IMPROVEMENTS VALLEY VISTA CHARTER SCHOOL 601 N. rARMCW STREET, SANTA ANA 92703 City Council 26 — 335 — 1/16/2024 62 ; Y I� ^- 29 i� Y S9 92 LEGEND: <a S --- -- - - maun ut �.8 ^Y to esi [v-1 - it rsl [,slwa reu i. A'A) � � R IpniRG va lRx rrslw § plfi aaRrx ur f0 RADRabsn eR' DRIArYr' - [5 rG 1tt[cexrMletlgx ua rr E rr M -�� rmrv� w�Ia - 1yfi1 - PRDIJSm C P.M[M [rE ® mliD MG dAllwr l' - )' p C R�lCYFxf d �•. mr6vAtYR �m�r 91m.Q i 11� `ee / a(MNMMrIn aenohi � - p �.(��) dTMr Sr.MKT tttwt'DxMam 6ev(ror U�Wr6illl[� _ N CONSTRUCTION NOTES; ©rclmgn cu.rwa orw�R. wrorw rRR err sro � nR aec QQ roar[ [w*r`c tRncrn wtroW c TOP a Cm ►ROF11t Q crxslnx'1 Rtt mr.0 rq an SN rin. rAs[ >. �.R' r10RIZONIAL SC&L. 1'a 10 VERRCdL SCALE- I'_ 1" O EnD wio aroaAY Qi 1' fi !' Y K PnT.xrn rADy mCL d _ +ru«,r uns A cure wt rRc 6t )' Mr nal-orYni K ngRor. aWxl.Yxr N Mt-p91F K N+ED � 9nNR ID Irrle� Fr6I1f. K SEC1gR. p glum iRrrpN P[A cAr zm. �Im 1 O CuSrnn �- eR r ��M Y• KIW T/ S�MpN Rr.ri rD. i. ,ER wrtR ro x T,� rrsuulu a�an rortts rru v�rs u rar rrp wPuraior no nrRln r [Rrs cort.cl ni wrrr 95-0 usTo�xrlor°;i;'s bm n°1Ae w riw +ti561rrC1 rw.arirr NOTE; FAIRVIEW STREET Ad CpR1NJClAl1 rqr AYr IttFMRFMtl ON CGir¢t >r,rr Krr ul VSS. i. I. STAT11OrW4 NOTES. '. r]+DO _ rS. Y; _ W+Ip � x fM1LR 51 aNr[Iel[ im.mo0 . O.lt mrtu (Llifpl>t[ 'o.W w REFERENCE PLANS: _ R-�TDu sr P -I n..s Ell 6 --__- _ - - - -_ MPRDr[6 pr Nri RLBIS rrMR eRFr:rPr p1t[ Yi[R R[SpNIrE xruNG UWwgxw. M SOMM AW L� Tw�cYa �c PLAN Y~ NOTICE TO CONTRACTCR .r•. y�MISr.CK�I �rf�rl���r STREET IMPROVEMENTS VALLEY VISTA CHARTER SCHOOL 601 N. FAiRNFW STREET, SANTA ANA 92703 PUBLIC WORKS A ENCY CITY OF SANTA ANA City Council 26 — 336 1/16/2024 � Y OBSTYlG ■U■�IIIi TO BE '> RENOVATED f yf `' .wrwrvww �.� PRELIMINARY PLANTING NOTES EMSTING BUNDING # } PLANT LEGEND PRELIMINARY WELD CALCULATIONS w�.mwcensr� _.- r mar .. r.a •ri yTu.w.r.n.n.aw N, STUDIO W ARCHITECTS .R.'.xiEtt EN[iEEn — 1 ILK Yip G° VISTA HERITAGE GLOBAL ACADEMY 28M W M STREET S NTA APK CA 927W CONDMONAL WE PERWT VISTA CHARTER SCHOOL PHASE IV 401 N iAlftE W. SANTA ANA CA 92107 PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN .more PL1 � y City Counci �i ■ KEYNOTES I/ GENERAL NOTES .; s PARKING ANALYSIS Ii - Ch, " I I - LEGEND W STH ST I y ounce — 4� I" STUDIO W ARCHITECTS o 0 O..ox �i�d �r wH ISTA HERITAGE GLOBAL ACADEMY 2099 w 5TH STREET SMITA ANA, G 92703 CONDMOWL USE PEFW VISTA CHARTER SCHOOL PHASE N 601 N FAPV*V. SWA,AN& CA 92703 SITE PLAN DEMO .Im N�nAv .rf� 91.new A1.0 CLEAN AIR VEHICLE PARKING sib _.NIP# t......a .� . ., �, STUDIO W ACCESSIBLE PARKING ARCHITECTS OTE MAN -TURN AROONO ANALYMFI'•R� 1 i!l aw n. xua suaaw..n .mm wwnw.. I s wa PARKING ANALYSIS LEGEND W STH ST i3 i 0-- VISTA HERITAGE GLOBAL ACADEW 2_09 W STH STREET SANTA ANA, CA W703 COWNT OL USE PERMIT VISTA CHARTER SCHOOL PHASE IV $01 N FARWEW, SANfA ANA, CA S2703 SITE PLAN OVERALL .ppYrun Nweer Pwq,./.M. A1.1 STUDIO W ARCHITECTS LEGEND PARCEL4 0 0 ®R .......... --- - --------- %ASTA HERITAGE GLOBAL ACADEMY P8RCEL2 2M W STK STREET SANTA ANA, CA 92703 CONOMONAIL USE PERMT JL VISTA CHARTER SCHOOL M'j.) PHASE IV 601 Is FAIIRVIEW. SANTA ANA, CA . j ENLARGED SITE PLAN A1.2 aq CF CF C", 41c, T 1 • I - 1 -- ---1 I I I er.xi �� Ru erzu.r ....&TAIRPLANI MEZZAMME PLAN ri.' • *+t FIRST FLOOR AREA 5,877 SF (INCLUDING MEZZ.) N, STUDIO W ARCHITECTS s�vewwu.® er ear w..e sv. � ... srmw.vnem.wn GENERAL NOTES remvuv a�rore. wvnoevr t a ee..nW.r�w e...vaa,.. ca�r�a.nra..eaa" 70tct� a C) VISTA HERITAGE GLOBAL ACADEMY 26091N 5TH STREET SANTA ANA, CA 92707 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT LEGEND VISTA CHARTER SCHOOL PHASEIV 601 N FAEMEW, SANTA ANA, CA 9I707 FLOOR PLAN A2.1 a ,o City Council T q J `r T Y �7 KEYNOTES GENERAL NOTES STUDIO W ARCHITECTS r y Clo., 0 -- wEvftµ VISTA HERITAGE GLOBAL ACADEMY 2609 W 5TH STREET SANTA ANA, CA WM CONDITIONk USE PERMT LEGEND VISTA CHARTER SCHOOL PHASE N ® wa ...iuMr�r, arr a 601 N FAWWEW, SANTA ANA, CA 92701 ROOF PLAN MWMM NMM Rwwn r,M r1+va'11i, a 3O - A4.1 City Council 1 !!amp■ ■■■■■ ���Mm ■■ MEMO 1� WEST ELEVATo I$ WWTH LEVATM +T•,'a 11 .� :�.w., .o......� S M EAST ELEVATION 9 SOUTH ELEVATOR • - - KEYNOTES STUDIO W ARCHI I ECTS wsw � S�YFIf [TI RanA�Sw o..amw...nm....,,W. ...,mmw.Nwy..s. VISTA HERITAGE GLOBAL ACADEMY 2W W SIN STREET SMITA MA CA 22M CONDITIONAL 119E POW VISTA CHARTER SCHOOL PHASE IV 601 N 7ARM W SANTA ANA CA 927M COLORED EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A5,1 ounce .TLTli1 u..'r.w tui � WruufiianeexM. �e`mee STUDIO W ME tECT1oN 1-•.o� 1 ARCHITECTS .�.�rn Aiere i4CN.f!10.i - - -.•a.u.WwawrtmvfYJ - -- M•n ,eoa r., nnw.d. Mie'wU.( $. ERE AECTNNN 7 WE EECTM ] aim w wee �]� floe lLatl sCs1YE w�� �wv ncrd.p sxeb wv9WiYM.Mwetpepn e t VISTA HERITAGE GLOBAL ACADEMY 26H W STN STREET SANTA ANA. CA 92703 CONDITIONAL 11SE PF.R►fi VISTA CHARTER SCHOOL PHASE IV 601 N FAIRVIEW, SANTA ANA, CA E27M SITE SECTIONS Amk�m Nnb� 6rrgM� A62 ounce Q LM VOL OORNAMENTAL '.'1 ORNAMENTAL DOUBLE GATE -PULL ,�,.a B SIDEELEVATIOil1 FENCE TYPICAL 1?•�fy W 4-02 STANDARD$105 WELDED WIRE MESNFENCINO 2 RAIL WROUGHT IRON FENCE sv•�'4 7 FENCE FOOTIN6ATBUILDINC --Li r 2 rzz lift 1111111116111f ertn �5 1 ORNAMENTAL DOUBLE GATE I?-'b I c, wn,oc.. � u .rgLnw `4 ITM- I" STUDIO W ARCHITECTS w.s yuo-,w.4.aws.oam F k 41nn0Y14i • o.n V 52uRIL MEINAM VISTA HERITAGE GLOBAL ACADEMY 2609 W 5TH STREET SANTA ANA. CA 42703 CONDITIONAL USE PERNAT VISTA CHARTER SCHOOL PHASE IV 601 N FARVIEW, SANTA ANA. CA 92703 SITE DETALS A�Nin4w hw4q llniss -, A1a.z Lity Louncil 2b — Job NIP# STUDIO W A R C H I T E C T 5 I�1 pl��aNu r MA�.'+1ur� nw SAt A)p�eplEN tmtzmi ANORFn BYJi6A a l!N63.. 'ISTA HERITAGE GLOBAL ACADEMY M w 5TH STREET SAWAANA, CA 92703 CDNDITIDNAI USE PERMIT 'ISTA CHARTER SCHOOL PHASE N 01 N FASMEW. SANTA AN& CA 99703 ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN �xm Hsu m w Ell rrY I I IM I M I p 9 I" STUDIO W ARCHITECTS Y OE [3�111 011111114 0 Drr VISTA HERITAGE GLOM ACADEMY 26NWFiSTREET SWAANA,CAq27U3 CMIYTXA4 USE PERMIT VISTA CHARTER SCHOOL PHASE 601 IN FAjMyw. SWA ANA rA 927M SITE LIGHTING PHOTOMETRIC PLAN E1.2 City Council 26- MANDATORY CALGREEN CHECKLIST .. , , tv a, ..Jw sw.a ay.�w a� .a r.Jw. ..•n w.. rw. r. imw rra wsi®r. i r.o.m SAC l � Yd"i . utln`nj ° : . TTT m�nYc : a.:.:,e,. +Era ass"ir.we n WATSi REDUCi10N RXTUFE ROW RATES ww. rwM.e I awv Iw VJ. a•. tl w .� r[a.,o rypn w wuwrs/n¢r WATER CONSERVATION RxTu E R-ow RATES PLUMBING EflUPMENT SCHEDULE +wK. ¢wLh r�..s M.OYiL�.•.A4i-Y4M1! - uu rra ,i ao e.w.al .0 w .",i .W �walrY) „ . • ^ wwx.o °YtA WEp s`�[i waiClr�[i .w , tlM1 wp iwu. rltu,.�E .f. PLM PLUMBING PPE MATERIAL SC1EDi1LE �D. 2- ,... Y�r, u,w. r„J• .w r w.or m101`°sn°°`.s �.e o Iv`^"...r ••a °Y "+'a w..a,.a. w tx .n ... rw .ru.. Ir..cti rrwn M+.�°WO°11•.p �n�`.u.:Jnr aru �°TM�M c�rc� � ��•' w iG f$ AND R1fTI1RE RTTNGS I.ww° sltl..pi . .....ar,r ae. pAU K. • `.� � ` ri..RR[II ��II.I.1•�kl• ®�.�RRRL7 F7♦ ' �iix Fi7Grrilkil RMOiN FUTURE SCH ME c. ��% +LL .PML •WI !r� L.' .-,.J °wW�Jeal`rrtra wh.""+... re o.• wrNn-lJe�vuwYn ��. _ r - �°e� noew. n r+r. war s.w a anu .a.� re. ac..x mwt,aei i 1 e.0 r �� .clws�io. _ a. �.� w .a. wr azo w.wwrle sar. w ELECTRIC WATER HEATER SCHIEDIlLE ELECTRIC PONT—OF—USE WATER HEATER SCHEDULE FIXTURE DATA WATER CALCULATIONS h)Yr."k —D -11. PRESS- L.J 1. �',,11,dr pJ.Est� C0.0 M1TEr $12MG l Gm^wi w ui Im a ; unw �� �1 ILL, 9=. n .0 � A ywn ..JSJw .°si l.° • itw w4M.Rw ---- .a nlwJa uRy.5 w nnl - i! A DOlESIC Mi w.iE9 L2M.G NIP# STUDIO W ARCHITECTS aWmwwv.o w'm,e t9e.n swr ot: �...9uew1M4erur. am `.w401Rw�N � w EnCAEED !So Y ' Owwu.0 g. 0..•.-..�.r!„ r¢. uvpr VISTA HERITAGE GLOBAL ACADEMY m W 5TH STREET SANTA ANA, CA W707 CONDF7 0W USE PERIAT VISTA CHARTER SCHOOL PHASE IV 601 N FAIRVIEW. SMTA ANA, CA 92701 PLUMBING SCHEDULES .xanm am .x.a..a"nramr nJ..ro�Jw.e. ;°- Pa2 ounce i -7w Exhibit 7 - Environmental Analysis and Exemption CEQA Exemption 15183 — Environmental Documentation Date: December 5, 2023 Project: Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project To: City of Santa Ana CC: Vince Fregoso, Vista Charter Public Schools Ingrid Canedo, Vista Charter Public Schools From: Frances Yau, AICP, Michael Baker International Alan Ashimine, Michael Baker International The City of Santa Ana (City) has received a project application for the proposed Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project (project), located at 601 and 615 North Fairview Street, Santa Ana, Orange County, California (Assessor's Parcel Numbers [APN] 405- 241-04). As documented herein, the proposed project meets the conditions for a statutory exemption pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15183 (California Public Resources Code 21083.3) to allow for a streamlined environmental review process. 1. Project Background On April 19, 2022, the Santa Ana City Council adopted the Golden City Beyond (General Plan Update) and certified the Santa Ana General Plan Update Final Recirculated Program Environmental Impact Report (GPU EIR), dated October 2021. The General Plan Update provides long-term policy direction to guide the physical development, quality of life, economic health, and sustainability of the City through 2045. The General Plan Update consists of the following 12 elements: Community, Economic Prosperity, Mobility, Public Services, Conservation, Noise, Open Space, Safety, Land Use, Historic Preservation, Housing, and Urban Design. According to the GPU EIR, the full buildout of the General Plan Update (year 2045) would result in a net increase of 96,855 person, 36,261 housing units, 5,849,220 nonresidential square footage, and 11,436 jobs as compared to existing conditions in 2019. The GPU EIR was prepared pursuant to Section 15168 of the CEQA Guidelines and allows analysis consistent with the high-level nature of the General Plan Update. The programmatic environmental document may be used to eliminate or reduce the scope of future environmental review for individual projects that are consistent with the General Plan Update pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 21083.3 and other streamlining provisions authorized by CEQA. Later projects implemented after the General Plan Update are examined with consideration of the GPU EIR to determine whether subsequent environmental analysis or documentation must be prepared. In addition, the CEQA Guidelines currently provide for streamlining through Section 15183, Projects Consistent with a Community Plan or Zoning, Section 15183.3, Streamlining for Infill Projects, and 15183.5, Tiering and Streamlining the Analysis of Greenhouse Gas Emissions. CEQA Guidelines Section 15183 allows a streamlined environmental review process for projects that are consistent with the densities established by existing zoning, community plan, or general plan policies for which an EIR was certified. Specifically, as set forth in CEQA Guidelines Section 15183(d), the 15183 exemption applies to projects which meet the following conditions: City Council 26 — 350 1/16/2024 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 (1) The project is consistent with: (A) A community plan adopted as part of a general plan, (B) A zoning action which zoned or designated the parcel on which the project would be located to accommodate a particular density of development, or (C) A general plan of a local agency, and (2) An EIR was certified by the lead agency for the zoning action, the community plan, or the general plan. Further, as set forth in CEQA Guidelines Section 15183(e), the 15183 exemption applies when all feasible mitigation measures identified in the applicable general plan are implemented by the public agency with jurisdiction to require such mitigation measures. As demonstrated throughout this memorandum, the project would qualify for streamlining of environmental review as a project consistent with a community plan or zoning under CEQA Guidelines Section 15183. 2. Project Description 2.1 Project Location The City is located in central Orange County, generally north of the San Diego Freeway (Interstate 405 [1-405]), south of the Garden Grove Freeway (State Route 22 [SR-22]), and west of the Costa Mesa Freeway (SR-55) and Interstate 5 (1-5). The City is approximately 30 miles southeast of downtown Los Angeles; refer to Exhibit 1, Regional Vicinity. Santa Ana is surrounded by the cities of Orange and Garden Grove to the north, Tustin to the east, Costa Mesa and Irvine to the south, and Fountain Valley and Westminster to the west. The generally north -south trending Santa Ana River traverses the western portion of the City. The approximately 0.9-acre project site is located at 601 and 615 North Fairview Street within the western portion of Santa Ana; refer to Exhibit 2, Site Vicinity. Regional access to the project site is provided via SR-22 and 1-5. Local access to the site is provided via North Fairview Street and West 5th Street. 2.2 Existing Conditions The project site is located within the Fairview Business Park, a highly developed and urbanized area of Santa Ana. The Fairview Business Park is occupied by institutional uses (i.e., Vista Heritage Global Academy and Templo Calvario Church) as well as various commercial and office uses (i.e., Echo Entertainment Inc., Small Wonders Children Center, IPW Industries Inc, A-1 Automotive Core Supplier, La Perla Spice Co., Inc., and Thai Eats). As shown on Exhibit 2, the northern portion of the site consists of one existing approximately 5,837-square foot vacant building formerly occupied by auto repair businesses and associated surface parking along North Fairview Street. The southern portion of the site consists of a surface parking lot shared between Vista Heritage Global Academy and Templo Calvario Church. Minimal landscaping is present on -site; no trees are present within the project boundaries. The site is accessible from North Fairview Street via two driveways to the west, and two alleys connecting to West 5th Street to the south and southeast. Dec i y ounci1 26 — 351 1/16/20 ge 2 I 395 Palmdale _ Adelanto i Apple Valley Victorville i i i Hesperia i S A N B E R N A R D I N I C O U N T Y LOS A N G ELES I Lake' C O U N T Y Arrowhead 1 San Fernando ®' Running © ® San Springs ® Burbank Rancho Bernardino Cucamonga © Pasadena � Glendora Fontana tpt Rialto Redlands — West Pomo a Ontario Covina Los Angeles Chino i Riverside ® Whittier ® r Yorba NN Moreno Be Linda Norco Valley © Fullerton I Corona Torrance ® R I V E R S I COUNT QGarden ® Perris Grove® © ORANGE Sun Santa Long C O U N T Y City Beach Ana Irvine Costa HuntingtonMesa ® ` Lake Beach / Elsinore _ Newport Project Beach Mission Viejo Murrieta Site Laguna Beach Laguna Niguel San luan / j Temecula Capistrano l�� \ Dana �r \ Point San 9 Clemente USMC I Fallbrook Camp Pendleton C, ti c o�, jJ VISTA CHARTER PUBLIC SCHOOLS DISTRICT OFFICE AND OUTDOOR SPACE PROJECT CEQA EXEMPTION 15183 NOT TO SCALE Reai�Vicinity N T E R N A T 0 VyAG o u n di.,,. 1N 196390 26 — `Y Exhibit 1 ► %� F ... tT s } _ - AA. . >� M. !, tiIF 0 PROJECT SITE dlim� Source: Google Earth Pro, June 2023 VISTA CHARTER PUBLIC SCHOOLS DISTRICT OFFICE AND OUTDOOR SPACE PROJECT CEQA EXEMPTION 15183 NOT TO SCALE Site Vicinity I N T E R N A T t3fly ftun�.2• 1N 196390 ` Exhibit 2 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 Surrounding uses adjacent to the project site include industrial, commercial, institutional, and residential uses. An existing railroad alignment (currently under construction for electric street cars) bounds the project site to the north and northeast, Vista Heritage Global Academy and office uses are located to the south (within the Fairview Business Center), and North Fairview Street bounds the site to the west and northwest. The Romero -Cruz Academy and Santa Ana River are located further west across North Fairview Street. 2.3 General Plan Designation and Zoning According to the General Plan Update Land Use Element Figure LU-1, Land Use Map, the project site is designated Industrial/Flex-Low (FLEX-1.5).' The Industrial/Flex designation is intended to provide context -appropriate development in areas with existing industrial uses. This land use designation allows for clean industrial uses that do not produce significant air pollutants, noise, or other nuisances typically associated with industrial uses, including office -industrial flex spaces, small-scale clean manufacturing, research and development and multilevel corporate offices, commercial retail, artist galleries, craft maker spaces, and live -work units. Adaptive reuse of buildings to accommodate live -work units is encouraged. Standalone residential is not permitted. According to the General Plan Update Land Use Element Table LU-3, Density and Intensity Standards, the FLEX-1.5 designation allows a maximum 1.5 floor -area -ratio (FAR) and/or 30 dwelling per acre, with a maximum building height of three stories. Based on the City of Santa Ana Zoning Map (Zoning Map), the site is zoned Light Industrial (M1) and Specific Development No. 82 (SD-82).2 According to Ordinance No. NS-2777, permitted uses in the SD-82 District are the uses permitted in the M1 zone as specified in Municipal Code Chapter 41, Article III, Division 18, M1 (Light Industrial) and schools by right and churches with a conditional use permit. Further, it is noted that the operational and development standards for the permitted and conditionally permitted Light Industrial Uses within the SD-82 zone shall be consistent with the operational and development standards found in Municipal Code Chapter 41, Article III, Division 18. 2.4 Project Characteristics The project proposes to remodel and reoccupy a building formerly occupied by an automotive repair use as an office building for Vista Charter Public Schools. Specifically, the existing 5,837- square foot building would be remodeled for use as Vista Charter Public Schools district office; refer to Exhibit 3, Conceptual Site Plan. The existing open floor plan would be redesigned to include offices and conference rooms, with the exterior enhanced with new materials and color palette. The remodeled building would have approximately 5,764 square feet of usable interior space. Approximately 10 existing administrative staff would relocate from other Vista Charter educational facilities to the proposed district office; the project would not result in any new jobs. The project would also redevelop the shared surface parking lot in the southern portion of the site into an outdoor area consisting of an approximately 2,297-square foot community garden, an approximately 7,372-square foot play field, and an approximately 4,640-square foot play yard; refer to Exhibit 3. Outdoor areas would serve administrative staff and existing students of the adjoining Vista Heritage Global Academy and would not increase existing school capacity. The community garden, play field, and play yard would not be for public use. City of Santa Ana, Golden City Beyond, Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Element, Figure LU-1, Land Use Map, April 2022. 2 City of Santa Ana, City of Santa Ana Zoning Map, March 4, 2021. Dec i Y ouncil 26 — 354 1/16/20 ge 5 -------- ________ ________ / s _ ____----------------------------------------------- �Ck .. 10I 'A7 -rrrrrrrrrrrr q�� �� IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII Illlllllllllli i� � F G[ R IIIIIIIIIIIII y+ U 9C C A_ IIIIIIIIIIIII I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Q� TID Eos UIIDINIY^ l l_lel�l l l l l l i GPRDENE PARCEL zzsi sr� easel n IEleowaos.m. onovovF __ll _ VB•96 B 394.19'(MI 11 IEII 1 Ill 589. 9'26 E '38C.19' R)� .,'IIII ';III IIIII IIIII III III I I I III IRI—SIF 1 •.I I' } PROJECT SITE P aA6Co sfD (E)BUILDING -•111 III II I o DROP EE r ® (E)VISiAGLOBPLACADEMIES 81 SF I PARCELI 5 PARCEL 3 I I ® ® UBE HEGHUCAT�ON SS I I IEI BUILDING (E)BUILDING — 1 I I I 1 1 190 11 W 5TH ST Source: Studio W Architect%June 2023 VISTA CHARTER PUBLIC SCHOOLS DISTRICT OFFICE AND OUTDOOR SPACE PROJECT CEQA EXEMPTION 15183 INTERNATIONAL Council 26 — 355 1/16/ Teptual Site Plan 10=3 IN199999 Exhibit 3 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 Ancillary improvements include landscaping, fencing along the perimeters of the proposed outdoor areas, and expansion of the existing parking lot. The front parking lot facing North Fairview Street would provide 20 parking spaces and the side parking lot adjacent to an existing railroad alignment (currently under construction for electric street cars) would provide 43 spaces. In total, the site would provide 63 parking spaces. Similar to existing conditions, the site is accessible from North Fairview Street via two driveways to the west, and two alleys connecting to West 5th Street to the south and southeast. Internal drive aisles would provide access to the proposed office building and outdoor areas. The student drop-off and pick-up area and internal circulation pattern would be slightly modified to accommodate the outdoor learning garden space and the outdoor play areas. Specifically, the fenced play yard would have a dual use. During drop-off and pick-up hours, the fence would be opened to allow for vehicles to use as a drop-off/pick-up turnaround area; no play yard activities would occur during these times. During school hours, the play yard fence would be closed for safety and students would be able to utilize the play yard for school activities.; refer to Exhibit 3. 2.4.1 Entitlements To allow the use of the former automotive repair building for the proposed office use, a Zone Change would be required to modify the existing Light Industrial (M 1) zoning for the site to Specific Development No. 82 (SD-82) to be consistent with the majority of the Fairview Business Park. In addition to the proposed Zone Change, the project also proposes a Zoning Ordinance Amendment to amend the operational standards of the SD-82 zoning district to allow an outdoor play area. Under current SD-82 provisions, play areas for children are limited to indoors only. 2.4.2 Project Construction Construction of the proposed project is anticipated to take approximately eight months to complete. The construction activities would include building construction, paving, and architectural coating. Construction activities would comply with the City's Noise Ordinance, Section 18-314(e) of the Santa Ana Municipal Code (Municipal Code) and occur only Monday through Saturday between 7:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. Construction equipment and materials staging would occur within the project site. During construction, vehicular access would be provided via existing access points along North Fairview Street and/or West 5th Street. 3. California Environmental Quality Act Regulatory Setting CEQA applies to proposed projects initiated by, funded by, or requiring discretionary approvals from State or local government agencies. CEQA Guidelines apply generally to discretionary actions by agencies which may have a significant effect on the environment. However, where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that an activity may have a significant effect on the environment, and if the activity meets the conditions for a CEQA Exemption, it is considered exempt from the provisions of CEQA. CEQA Guidelines Section 15183 allows a streamlined environmental review process for projects that are consistent with the densities established by existing zoning, community plan, or general plan policies for which an EIR was certified and does not require additional environmental review, except as might be necessary to examine whether there are project -specific significant effects which are peculiar to the project or its site. Projects that are consistent with the densities and use characteristics considered by the GPU E I R may qualify for the CEQA Guidelines Section 15183 Exemption process. This exemption process may be used when a project meets the following conditions: Dec i y ouncil 26 — 356 1/16/20 ge 7 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 a) The project is consistent with the development density established by existing zoning, community plan or general plan policies for which an EIR was certified. b) There are no project specific effects which are peculiar to the project or its site. c) There are no project specific impacts which the prior EIR failed to analyze as significant effects. d) There are no potentially significant off -site and/or cumulative impacts which the prior EIR failed to evaluate. e) There is no substantial new information which results in more severe impacts than anticipated by the prior EIR. It is the intention of the City to pursue an exemption for the proposed project. The environmental review contained in Section 4 has been prepared to assess the potential for the proposed project to result in environmental effects and whether the proposed project qualifies for an exemption under CEQA Guidelines Section 15183. The previously certified GPU EIR serves as the primary environmental compliance document for the project, and the text, standards of conditions, and applicable mitigation measures are incorporated by reference. Per the CEQA Guidelines, the exemption does not need to be circulated for public review but can be included in the staff report prior to making a decision on the project. 4. Environmental Review This section includes an assessment, by issue area, of the proposed project's potential effects on the environment. 4.1 Aesthetics 4.1.1 GPU EIR Findings The GPU EIR concluded that while buildout of the General Plan Update would result in greater density and intensity in the five focus areas, aesthetic impacts would be less than significant with implementation of GPU EIR Regulatory Requirements (RR) AE-1 through AE-3. RR AE-1 requires the City to enforce adherence with the California Building Code, including provisions of the Building Energy Efficiency Standards related to lighting. RR AE-2 requires the City to enforce development standards and other general provisions as detailed in the Zoning Code (Municipal Code Chapter 41, Zoning) to ensure consistency between the General Plan and proposed development projects. Last, RR AE-3 requires the City to enforce the development standards and guidelines of adopted specific plans. The GPU EIR also states that visual resources in the City include views from public places of the Santiago Creek along the northern portion of the City and the Santa Ana River along the western portion of the City. There are no State -designated scenic highways in Santa Ana. 4.1.2 Project Analysis The project site is located along North Fairview Street and is currently developed with one existing building formerly occupied by automobile repair businesses and associated surface parking. Due to intervening topography and ornamental vegetation, the Santa Ana River and Santiago Creek are not visible from the project site. The proposed project would renovate a former automotive repair building as the Vista Charter Public Schools district office. Although the proposed project Dec i y ouncil 26 - 357 1/16/20 9e 8 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 would require a Zone Change to modify the site's M1 zoning to SD-82, it would make the site's zoning consistent with the rest of the Fairview Business Park. Additionally, no change in density or building height is proposed. Thus, the proposed project would be consistent with the allowed development density for the site's FLEX-1.5 land use designation established by the General Plan Update and would have similar or lesser significant impacts than those analyzed in the GPU EIR. Furthermore, development would be required to comply with existing standards governing aesthetics for the SD-82 zone, which is consistent with the standards for M1 uses in Municipal Code Chapter 41, Article 111, Division 18. Overall, the project would renovate an unused, vacant automobile repair building as a school district office and provide outdoor areas with a community garden and play areas. Thus, the project would improve the aesthetic character of the project site and complement the existing development in the Fairview Business Park. Therefore, the proposed project would not have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista, damage scenic resources within a State -designated scenic highway, or conflict with existing policies governing scenic quality. Moreover, to further reduce impacts associated with the proposed project, implementation of RR AE-1 would ensure compliance with the California Building Code, including provisions of the Building Energy Efficiency Standards related to lighting and adherence to applicable development standards in the Zoning Code. Additionally, the proposed project would comply with existing outdoor lighting standards for nonresidential buildings in Municipal Code Section 8-211, Special commercial building provisions, which require lighting to be contained on -site. Proposed nighttime lighting on -site for the outdoor areas would be limited to security lighting (i.e., no field lights that could impact neighboring uses at night). Therefore, impacts related to nighttime lighting and glare would be less than significant. 4.1.3 Conclusion As such, the project is consistent with the General Plan Update. With implementation of RR AE- 1 and AE-2 identified in the GPU EIR, the proposed project would not have any specific effects which are peculiar to the project or the site. There are no project -specific impacts or potentially significant off -site or cumulative impacts the GPU EIR failed to analyze, and there are no new significant or substantially more severe aesthetic impacts than anticipated by the GPU EIR. Applicable GPU EIR Regulatory Requirements/Mitigation Measures: RR AE-1 The City shall enforce adherence with the California Building Code, including provisions of the Building Energy Efficiency Standards related to lighting. RR AE-2 The City shall enforce development standards and other general provisions as detailed in the Zoning Code (Chapter 41 of the Municipal Code) to ensure consistency between the City's General Plan and proposed development projects. This includes compliance with the requirements of any ordinance adopting specific development plans. 4.2 Agriculture and Forestry Resources 4.2.1 GPU EIR Findings Most of the City, including the project site, is urbanized, developed, and does not provide opportunities for agricultural or forestry use. As stated in the GPU EIR, the City is nearly built out and does not contain any significant agricultural resources or land designated or zoned for agricultural use. Dec i y ounci1 26 — 358 1/16/20 9e 9 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 4.2.2 Project Analysis The project site is fully developed and consists of a building formerly utilized by automobile repair businesses and a surface parking area within the Fairview Business Park. The project does not involve any land use changes related to agriculture, forest land, or timberland production. The project site and surrounding area are not designated as Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance, and do not include lands that qualify as forest land or timberland.3 Additionally, there are no lands in the City under a Williamson Act contract.4 Therefore, no impact to agricultural and forestry resources would occur. 4.2.3 Conclusion Overall, the project is consistent with the General Plan Update, and would not have any specific effects which are peculiar to the project or the site. There are no project -specific impacts or potentially significant off -site or cumulative impacts the GPU EIR failed to analyze, and there are no new significant or substantially more severe impacts to agriculture and forestry resources than anticipated by the GPU EIR. Applicable GPU EIR Regulatory Requirements/Mitigation Measures: No GPU EIR regulatory requirements or mitigation measures apply. 4.3 Air Quality 4.3.1 GPU EIR Findings The GPU EIR determined that the General Plan Update is inconsistent with the Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) because buildout under the General Plan Update would exceed the population estimates assumed for the AQMP and would cumulatively contribute to the nonattainment designations of the South Coast Air Basin (Basin). The GPU EIR included Mitigation Measure AQ-2, which would reduce criteria air pollutant emissions from operational - related activities to the extent feasible; however, due to the magnitude and scale of the land uses that would be developed, no mitigation measures are available that would reduce operation and construction impacts below South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) thresholds. Therefore, the GPU EIR determined that impacts related to AQMP consistency and air quality emissions would remain significant and unavoidable. The GPU EIR also determined that construction activities associated with buildout of the GPU could generate short-term emissions that exceed the SCAQMD significance thresholds and cumulatively contribute to the nonattainment designations of the Basin. Implementation of Mitigation Measure AQ-1 would reduce criteria air pollutant emissions from construction -related activities to the extent feasible. However, the GPU EIR determined that construction time frames and equipment for site -specific development projects have a potential for multiple development projects to be constructed at one time, resulting in significant construction -related emissions. Thus, impacts were determined to be significant and unavoidable. California Department of Conservation, California Important Farmland Finder, https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/DLRP/CIFF/, accessed June 29, 2023. a California Department of Conservation, California Williamson Act Enrollment Finder, https://gis.conservation.ca.gov/portal/home/webmap/viewer. htmI?webmap=18f7488cOa9d4d299f5e9c33b3l 2f3l 2, accessed July 26, 2023. Dec I y ouncil 26 — 359 1/16/202 e 10 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 4.3.2 Project Analysis The following section evaluates the potential short- and long-term air quality impacts that would result from the construction and operation of the proposed project. The analysis is primarily based upon Attachment A, Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas/Energy Modeling Results. CONSISTENCY WITH APPLICABLE AIR QUALITY PLAN In order to reduce emissions in the Basin, the SCAQMD adopted the 2022 Air Quality Management Plan (2022 AQMP) which establishes a program of rules and regulations directed at reducing air pollutant emissions and achieving State and Federal air quality standards. The AQMP is a regional and multi -agency effort including the SCAQMD, California Air Resources Board (CARB), the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The 2022 AQMP pollutant control strategies are based on the latest scientific and technical information and planning assumptions, including the 2020-2045 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (2020-2045 RTP/SCS), updated emission inventory methodologies for various source categories, and SCAG's latest growth forecasts. SCAG's latest growth forecasts were defined in consultation with local governments and with reference to local general plans. The SCAQMD considers projects that are consistent with the AQMP, which is intended to bring the Basin into attainment for all criteria pollutants, to also have less than significant cumulative impacts. Criteria for determining consistency with the AQMP are defined by the following indicators: Criterion 1: With respect to the first criterion, SCAQMD methodologies require that an air quality analysis for a project include forecasts of project emissions in relation to contributing to air quality violations and delay of attainment. i) Would the project result in an increase in the frequency or severity of existing air quality violations? Since the consistency criteria identified under the first criterion pertains to pollutant concentrations, rather than to total regional emissions, an analysis of the project's pollutant emissions relative to localized pollutant concentrations is used as the basis for evaluating project consistency. As discussed below, localized concentrations of carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen oxides (NOx), particulate matter less than 10 microns in diameter (PM,o), and particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in diameter (PM2.5) would be less than significant during project construction and operations. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in an increase in the frequency or severity of existing air quality violations.5 5 Because reactive organic gases (ROGs) are not a criteria pollutant, there is no ambient standard or localized threshold for ROGs. Due to the role ROG plays in ozone formation, it is classified as a precursor pollutant and only a reaional emissions threshold has been established. Dec I y ouncil 26 — 360 1/16/202 e 11 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 ii) Would the project cause or contribute to new air quality violations? As discussed below, the proposed project would result in emissions that are below the SCAQMD thresholds. Therefore, the project would not have the potential to cause or affect a violation of the ambient air quality standards. iii) Would the project delay timely attainment of air quality standards or the interim emissions reductions specified in the AQMP? The proposed project would result in less than significant impacts regarding regional and localized concentrations during project construction and operations As such, the project would not delay the timely attainment of air quality standards or 2022 AQMP emissions reductions. Criterion 2: With respect to the second criterion for determining consistency with SCAQMD and SCAG air quality policies, it is important to recognize that air quality planning within the Basin focuses on attainment of ambient air quality standards at the earliest feasible date. Projections for achieving air quality goals are based on assumptions regarding population, housing, and growth trends. Thus, the SCAQMD's second criterion for determining project consistency focuses on whether the proposed project exceeds the assumptions utilized in preparing the forecasts presented in the 2022 AQMP. Determining whether a project exceeds the assumptions reflected in the 2022 AQMP involves the evaluation of the three criteria outlined below. The following discussion provides an analysis of each of these criteria. i) Would the project be consistent with the population, housing, and employment growth projections utilized in the preparation of the AQMP? Growth projections included in the 2022 AQMP form the basis for the projections of air pollutant emissions and are based on general plan land use designations and SCAG's 2020-2045 RTP/SCS demographics forecasts. The population, housing, and employment forecasts within the 2020-2045 RTP/SCS are based on local general plans as well as input from local governments, such as the City. The SCAQMD has incorporated these same demographic growth forecasts for various socioeconomic categories (e.g., population, housing, employment) into the 2022 AQMP. The project site is designated FLEX-1.5 and is zoned M1 and SD-82 zones. The FLEX- 1.5 designation allows for various office uses, a maximum FAR of 1.5 and a maximum building height of three stories. The proposed project would renovate an existing 5,837- square foot building as an office building for Vista Charter Public Schools. The building is located on a 0.9-acre (39,204 square -foot) site, thus providing an FAR of 0.15. The existing building height would remain the same at 19 feet and four inches. As such, the project would meet the design standards of the FLEX-1.5 designation. Permitted uses in the SD-82 zone are the uses permitted in the M1 zone as specified in Municipal Code Chapter 41, Article III, Division 18, M1 (Light Industrial), and schools by right and churches with a conditional use permit. Further, it is noted that the operational and development standards for the permitted and conditionally permitted Light Industrial Uses within the SD-82 zone shall be consistent with the operational and development standards found in Municipal Code Chapter 41, Article III, Division 18. To allow the use of the former automotive repair building for the proposed office use, a Zone Change would Dec i y ouncil 26 — 361 1/16/202 e 12 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 be required to modify the existing M1 zone to SD-82 to be consistent with the majority of the Fairview Business Park. In addition to the proposed Zone Change, the project also proposes a Zoning Ordinance Amendment to amend the operational standards of the SD- 82 zoning district to allow outdoor play areas. The project would also redevelop the shared surface parking lot in the southern portion of the site into an outdoor area consisting of an approximately 2,297-square foot community garden, an approximately 7,372-square foot play field, and an approximately 4,640-square foot play yard. Under current SD-82 provisions, play areas for children are limited to indoors only. Upon approval of the above entitlements, the proposed project would be consistent with the requirements of the General Plan Update and project site's zoning, and would not conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect. Impacts would be less than significant. The project proposes to remodel and reoccupy a building formerly occupied by an automotive repair use as an office building for Vista Charter Public Schools. As discussed in Section 4.14, Population and Housing, Vista Charter Public Schools operates six public charter schools in Los Angeles and Orange County and serves a total of 1,500 students. The proposed project creates an opportunity to have a district office located next to the organization's largest school, Vista Heritage Global Academy. However, it is anticipated that the project would not generate new employment opportunities within the existing organization. Additionally, proposed outdoor areas would serve existing students of the adjoining Vista Heritage Global Academy and would not increase existing school capacity. As a result, the proposed project would not directly or indirectly result in substantial unplanned population growth in the area or displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing. Additionally, as the SCAQMD has incorporated these same projections into the 2022 AQMP, it can be concluded that the proposed project would be consistent with the projections included in the 2022 AQMP. A less than significant impact would occur in this regard. ii) Would the project implement all feasible air quality mitigation measures? The proposed project would result in less than significant air quality impacts. Compliance with all feasible emission reduction rules and measures identified by the SCAQMD would be required as identified in RR AQ-2 and AQ-3 below. As such, the proposed project meets this 2022 AQMP consistency criterion. iii) Would the project be consistent with the land use planning strategies set forth in the AQMP? Land use planning strategies set forth in the 2022 AQMP are primarily based on the 2020- 2045 RTP/SCS. There is an existing bus stop located less than one mile to the west of the project site operated by Orange County Transportation Authority. Further, the project would provide bicycle parking and encourage alternate mode of transportation. Therefore, the project would be consistent with the actions and strategies of the 2020-2045 RTP/SCS As such, the proposed project meets this AQMP consistency criterion. In conclusion, the determination of 2022 AQMP consistency is primarily concerned with the long- term influence of a project on air quality in the Basin. The proposed project would not result in a long-term impact on the region's ability to meet State and Federal air quality standards. Further, the proposed project's long-term influence on air quality in the Basin would also be consistent with the SCAQMD and SCAG's goals and policies and is considered consistent with the 2022 AQMP. Dec i y ouncil 26 — 362 1/16/20'2 e 13 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 CRITERIA AIR POLLUTANTS Construction Impacts The project proposes to remodel and reoccupy an existing building to use as an office building for Vista Charter Public Schools and is not expected to involve any major construction activities. The project would be constructed over approximately eight months. Earthwork would be balanced on - site and would not require soil import or export. Exhaust emission factors for typical diesel - powered heavy equipment are based on the California Emissions Estimator Model version 2022.1 (CaIEEMod) program defaults. Variables factored into estimating the total construction emissions include the level of activity, length of construction period, number of pieces and types of equipment in use, site characteristics, weather conditions, number of construction personnel, and the amount of materials to be transported on- or off -site. The analysis of daily construction emissions has been prepared utilizing CaIEEMod. Refer to Attachment A for the CaIEEMod outputs and results. Fugitive dust emissions are associated with land clearing, ground excavation, cut -and -fill, and truck travel on unpaved roadways (including demolition as well as construction activities). Exhaust emissions from construction activities include emissions associated with the transport of machinery and supplies to and from the project site, employee commutes to the project site, emissions produced on -site as the equipment is used, and emissions from trucks transporting materials to/from the site. In addition to gaseous and particulate emissions, the application of asphalt and surface coatings creates ROG emissions, which are 03 precursors. Table 1, Proiect-Generated Construction Emissions, presents the anticipated daily short-term construction emissions. Table 1 Project -Generated Construction Emissions Emissions Source Pollutant (poundslda#,' ROG NOx c0 S02 PM10 Year 1 Construction Emissions2 0.59 5.98 7.14 0.01 0.32 0.27 Year 2 Construction Emissions2 0.89 5.65 7.11 0.01 0.44 0.25 Maximum Daily Emissions 0.89 5.98 7.14 0.01 0.44 0.27 SCAQMD Regional Thresholds 75 100 550 150 150 55 Threshold Exceeded? No No No No No No Notes: 1. Emissions were calculated using CaIEEMod version 2022.1. 2. Modeling assumptions include compliance with SCAQMD Rule 403 which requires: properly maintain mobile and other construction equipment; replace ground cover in disturbed areas quickly; water exposed surfaces three times daily; cover stockpiles with tarps; water all haul roads twice daily; and limit speeds on unpaved roads to 15 miles per hour. Source: Refer to Attachment A for assumptions used in this analysis. Construction Emissions Conclusion With the implementation of RR AQ-2 and AQ-3, criteria pollutant emissions during construction of the proposed project would not exceed the SCAQMD significance thresholds; refer to Table 1. Thus, total construction related air emissions would be less than significant. Operational Impacts Long-term operational air quality impacts consist of mobile source emissions generated from project -related traffic and emissions from stationary area and energy sources. It should be noted that emission reductions from the existing uses are not taken into account as they are currently vacant. Area source emissions include those generated by architectural coatings, consumer Dec i y ouncil 26 — 363 1/16/20'2 e 14 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 products, and landscape maintenance equipment associated with the development of the proposed project. Energy source emissions would be generated as a result of electricity and natural gas usage associated with the proposed project. Mobile sources are emissions from motor vehicles, including tailpipe and evaporative emissions. Emissions associated with each source are detailed in Table 2, Project -Generated Operational Emissions. Table 2 Project -Generated Operational Emissions Emissions Source Pollutant (pounds/day)' ROG NOx CO SOx PM,o PMz.s Project Summer Emissions Area 0.22 <0.01 0.30 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 Energy <0.01 0.05 0.04 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 Mobile 0.27 0.18 1.95 <0.01 0.41 0.11 Total Summer Emissions2 0.49 0.23 2.30 <0.01 0.41 0.11 SCAQMD Regional Threshold 55 55 550 150 150 55 Threshold Exceeded? No No No No No No Project Winter Emissions Area 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Energy <0.01 0.05 0.04 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 Mobile 0.27 0.20 1.85 <0.01 0.41 0.11 Total Winter Emissions2 0.44 0.24 1.89 <0.01 0.41 0.11 SCAQMD Regional Threshold 55 55 550 150 150 55 Threshold Exceeded? No No No No No No Notes: 1. Emissions were calculated using CalEEMod version 2022.1 and are based on 7,000 square feet building area as a conservative analysis. 2. The numbers may be slightly off due to rounding. Source: Refer to Attachment A for assumptions used in this analysis. As shown in Table 2, the total operational emissions for both summer and winter would not exceed established SCAQMD thresholds. Therefore, impacts in this regard would be less than significant. Air Quality Health Impacts Adverse health effects induced by criteria pollutant emissions are highly dependent on a multitude of interconnected variables (e.g., cumulative concentrations, local meteorology and atmospheric conditions, and the number and character of exposed individual [e.g., age, gender]). In particular, 03 precursors, VOCs, and NOx, affect air quality on a regional scale. Health effects related to 03 are therefore the product of emissions generated by numerous sources throughout a region. Existing models have limited sensitivity to small changes in criteria pollutant concentrations, and, as such, translating project -generated criteria pollutants to specific health effects or additional days of nonattainment would produce meaningless results. In other words, the project's less than significant increases in regional air pollution from criteria air pollutants would have nominal or negligible impacts on human health. As noted in the Brief of Amicus Curiae by the SCAQMD (April 6, 2015) for Sierra Club vs. County of Fresno, the SCAQMD acknowledged it would be extremely difficult, if not impossible to quantify health impacts of criteria pollutants for various reasons including modeling limitations as well as where in the atmosphere air pollutants interact and form. Further, as noted in the Brief of Amicus Curiae by the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District (SJVAPCD) (April 13, 2015) for the Sierra Club vs. County of Fresno, SJVAPCD acknowledged that currently available modeling tools are not equipped to provide a meaningful analysis of the correlation between an individual development project's air emissions and specific human health impacts. Dec i y ouncil 26 - 364 1/16/20'2 e 15 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 The SCAQMD acknowledges that health effects quantification from 03, as an example, is correlated with the increases in ambient level of 03 in the air (concentration) that an individual person breathes. The SCAQMD's Brief of Amicus Curiae for Sierra Club vs. County of Fresno states that it would take a large amount of additional emissions to cause a modeled increase in ambient 03 levels over the entire region. The SCAQMD states that based on their own modeling in the SCAQMD's 2012 AQMP, a reduction of 432 tons (864,000 pounds) per day of NOx and a reduction of 187 tons (374,000 pounds) per day of VOCs would reduce 03 levels at highest monitored sites by only nine parts per billion. As such, the SCAQMD concludes that it is not currently possible to accurately quantify 03-related health impacts caused by NOx or VOC emissions from relatively small projects (defined as projects with regional scope) due to photochemistry and regional model limitations. Thus, as the project would not exceed SCAQMD thresholds for construction and operational air emissions, the project would have a less than significant impact for air quality health impacts. LOCALIZED POLLUTANTS AND SENSITIVE RECEPTORS Sensitive receptors are defined as facilities or land uses that include members of the population that are particularly sensitive to the effects of air pollutants, such as children, the elderly, and people with illnesses. Examples of these sensitive receptors are residences, schools, hospitals, and daycare centers. The CARB has identified the following groups of individuals as those most likely to be affected by air pollution: the elderly over 65, children under 14, athletes, and persons with cardiovascular and chronic respiratory diseases such as asthma, emphysema, and bronchitis. The closest sensitive receptor to the project site is the Vista Heritage Global Academy School adjacent to the south of the project site. The closest residential uses are located approximately 100 feet to the north of the project site and the existing Romero -Cruz Academy school is located approximately 100 feet to the west. Localized Significance Thresholds Localized Significance Thresholds (LSTs) were developed in response to SCAQMD Governing Boards' Environmental Justice Enhancement Initiative (1-4). The SCAQMD provided the Final Localized Significance Threshold Methodology (dated June 2003 [revised 2008]) for guidance. The LST methodology assists lead agencies in analyzing localized air quality impacts. The SCAQMD provides the LST lookup tables for one-, two-, and five -acre projects emitting CO, NOx, PM2.5, and/or PM1o. The LST methodology and associated mass rates are not designed to evaluate localized impacts from mobile sources traveling over the roadways. The project site is located within Source Receptor Area (SRA) 17, Central Orange County. Construction LST The SCAQMD guidance on applying CaIEEMod to LSTs specifies the number of acres a particular piece of equipment would likely disturb per day.6 SCAQMD provides LST thresholds for one-, two, and five -acre site disturbance areas; SCAQMD does not provide LST thresholds for projects over five acres. The project proposes to remodel and reoccupy a building formerly occupied by an automotive repair use as an office building for Vista Charter Public Schools and would not involve any grading or major construction related activities and therefore, there would not be any 6 The number of acres represent the total acres traversed by grading equipment. In order to properly grade a piece of land, multiple passes with equipment may be required. The disturbance acreage is based on the equipment list and days of the grading phase according to the anticipated maximum number of acres a given piece of equipment can pass over in an 8-hour workday. Dec I y ounci1 26 — 365 1/16/20'2 e 16 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 significant on -site localized construction emissions. As such the project's localized construction emissions would not exceed the LSTs for SRA 17 and localized significance impacts from project - related construction would be less than significant. Operational LST According to SCAQMD LST methodology, LSTs would apply to operational activities if the project includes stationary sources or attracts mobile sources that may spend extended periods queuing and idling at the site (i.e., warehouse or transfer facilities). The proposed project does not include such uses. Thus, due to the lack of such emissions, no long-term LST analysis is needed. Operational LST impacts would be less than significant in this regard. Carbon Monoxide Hotspots CO emissions are a function of vehicle idling time, meteorological conditions, and traffic flow. Under certain extreme meteorological conditions, CO concentrations near a congested roadway or intersection may reach unhealthful levels (e.g., adversely affecting residents, school children, hospital patients, and the elderly). The Basin is designated as an attainment/maintenance area for the Federal CO standards and an attainment area under State standards. There has been a decline in CO emissions even though vehicle miles traveled (VMT) on U.S. urban and rural roads have increased; estimated anthropogenic CO emissions have decreased 68 percent between 1990 and 2014. In 2014, mobile sources accounted for 82 percent of the nation's total anthropogenic CO emissions.' Three major control programs have contributed to the reduced per -vehicle CO emissions, including exhaust standards, cleaner burning fuels, and motor vehicle inspection/maintenance programs. According to the SCAQMD CEQA Air Quality Handbook, a potential CO hotspot may occur at any location where the background CO concentration already exceeds 9.0 parts per million (ppm), which is the 8-hour California ambient air quality standard. The closest monitoring station to the project site that monitors CO concentration is Anaheim — 812 West Vermont Street, which is located approximately 4.5 miles north of the project site. The maximum CO concentration at Anaheim — 812 West Vermont Street station was measured at 1.976 ppm in 2022.8 Given that the background CO concentration does not currently exceed 9.0 ppm, a CO hotspot would not occur at the project site. Therefore, CO hotspot impacts would be less than significant in this regard. Asbestos Asbestos is a term used for several types of naturally occurring fibrous minerals that are a human health hazard when airborne. The most common type of asbestos is chrysotile, but other types such as tremolite and actinolite are also found in California. Asbestos is classified as a known human carcinogen by State, Federal, and international agencies and was identified as a toxic air contaminant by CARB in 1986. Asbestos can be released from serpentinite and ultramafic rocks when the rock is broken or crushed. At the point of release, the asbestos fibers may become airborne, causing air quality and human health hazards. These rocks have been commonly used for unpaved gravel roads, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Carbon Monoxide Emissions, https://cfpub.epa.gov/roe/indicator pdf.cfm?i=10, accessed July 3, 2023. 8 California Air Resources Board, Air Quality and Meteorological Information, 4.3.3 https://www.arb.ca.gov/agmis2/agdselect.php?tab=specialrpt, accessed July 3, 2023. Dec I y ouncil 26 — 366 1/16/202 e 17 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 landscaping, fill projects, and other improvement projects in some localities. Asbestos may be released to the atmosphere due to vehicular traffic on unpaved roads, during grading for development projects, and at quarry operations. All of these activities may have the effect of releasing potentially harmful asbestos into the air. Natural weathering and erosion processes can act on asbestos bearing rock and make it easier for asbestos fibers to become airborne if such rock is disturbed. According to the Department of Conservation Division of Mines and Geology, A General Location Guide for Ultramafic Rocks in California — Areas More Likely to Contain Naturally Occurring Asbestos Report, serpentinite and ultramafic rocks are not known to occur within the project area.9 It is possible that the existing on -site structure contains asbestos. According to SCAQMD Rule 1403 requirements, prior to the start of demolition activities, the existing structure shall be thoroughly surveyed for the presence of asbestos by a person that is certified by Cal/OSHA for asbestos surveys. Rule 1403 requires that the SCAQMD be notified a minimum of 10 days before any demolition activities begin with specific details of all asbestos to be removed, start and completion dates of demolition, work practices and engineering controls to be used to contain the asbestos emissions, estimates on the amount of asbestos to be removed, the name of the waste disposal site where the asbestos will be taken, and names and addresses of all contractors and transporters that will be involved in the asbestos removal process. Therefore, through adherence to the asbestos removal requirements, detailed in SCAQMD Rule 1403, a less than significant asbestos impact would occur during construction of the proposed project. Health Risk Impacts of On -Site Sensitive Receptors The project site is located adjacent to an existing railroad and light industrial uses. Therefore, the proposed on -site outdoor play area could be exposed to potential health impacts. It should be noted that according to several court decisions, CEQA analysis is not required to analyze impacts of the existing environment on a proposed project unless the project risks exacerbating existing environmental hazards. As such, the following discussion on the health risk impacts of on -site sensitive receptors is for informational purposes only. The SCAQMD recommends that health risk assessments be conducted for substantial sources of diesel particulate emissions (e.g., truck idling and movements, ship hoteling at ports, and train idling) and has provided guidance for analyzing mobile source diesel emissions.10 Similarly, CARB requires a health risk assessment when siting new sensitive land uses within 1,000 feet of a major service and maintenance rail yard or within 1,000 feet of a distribution center that accommodates more than 100 trucks per day.11 It should be noted that emissions of diesel particulate matter from train idling occurs predominantly at railroad yards, train stations, and train stops. Most train idling emissions are concentrated at railroad yards, where switching engines and local yard service operations are performed. The proposed project is located next to a railroad and is not located in the vicinity of a railyard or a train station. The railroad is currently not operational and is being developed to build a fixed guideway system called the Orange County Streetcar (OC Streetcar). The proposed OC Streetcars would be electrically -powered and would not consume diesel and thus, would not generate diesel particulate matter. Furthermore, the light industrial uses located to the south of the project site are small warehouses that do not qualify as a distribution center, and only involve occasional delivery truck trips that are much less than 100 s California Department of Conservation Division of Mines and Geology, A General Location Guide for Ultramafic Rocks in California — Areas More Likely to Contain Naturally Occurring Asbestos Report, August 2000, https://ww3.arb.ca.gov/toxics/asbestos/ofr 2000-019.pdf, accessed April 3, 2023. 10 South Coast Air Quality Management District, Health Risk Assessment Guidance for Analyzing Cancer Risks from Mobile Source Diesel Emissions, December 2002. 11 California Air Resources Board, Air Quality and Land Use Handbook: A Community Health Perspective, April 2005. Dec I y ouncil 26 — 367 1/16/20'2 e 18 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 truck trips per day. Therefore, diesel particulate matter emissions generated by the light industrial uses to the south are nominal and would not cause significant health impacts to on -site sensitive receptors (i.e., proposed outdoor play area). As such, on -site sensitive receptors would have less than significant health impacts from the future operations of the OC Streetcar and the existing operations of adjacent light industrial uses, and potential health risk from the future OC Streetcar and existing light industrial uses on on -site sensitive receptors was not quantified. A less than significant impact would occur in this regard. OBJECTIONABLE ODORS According to the SCAQMD CEQA Air Quality Handbook, land uses associated with odor complaints typically include agricultural uses, wastewater treatment plants, food processing plants, chemical plants, composting, refineries, landfills, dairies, and fiberglass molding. The proposed project does not include any uses identified by the SCAQMD as being associated with odors. Construction activities associated with the project may generate detectable odors from heavy- duty equipment exhaust and architectural coatings. However, construction -related odors would be short-term in nature and cease upon project completion. In addition, the project would be required to comply with the California Code of Regulations, Title 13, Sections 2449(d)(3) and 2485, which minimize the idling time of construction equipment either by requiring equipment to be shut off when not in use or limiting idling time to no more than five minutes. Compliance with these existing regulations would further reduce the detectable odors from heavy-duty equipment exhaust. Project's compliance with RR AQ-3 would ensure compliance with the SCAQMD Regulation XI, Rule 1113 —Architectural Coating, which would minimize odor impacts from ROG emissions during architectural coating. Any odor impacts to existing adjacent land uses would be short-term and negligible. As such, the project would not result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people. Impacts would be less than significant in this regard. 4.3.3 Conclusion Overall, the project is consistent with the General Plan Update. With implementation of RR AQ-1 though AQ-3 identified in the GPU EIR, the proposed project would not have any specific effects which are peculiar to the project or the site. There are no project -specific impacts or potentially significant off -site or cumulative impacts the GPU EIR failed to analyze, and there are no new significant or substantially more severe air quality impacts than anticipated by the GPU EIR. Applicable GPU EIR Regulatory Requirements/Mitigation Measures: RR AQ-1 (amended) New buildings are required to achieve the current California Building Energy Efficiency Standards (Title 24, Part 6) and California Green Building Standards Code (CALGreen) (Title 24, Part 11). The 202249 Building Energy Efficiency Standards became effective January 1, 20220. The Building and Energy Efficiency Standards and CALGreen are updated tri-annually with a goal to achieve net zero buildings energy for 2030. RR AQ-2 Construction activities will be conducted in compliance with California Code of Regulations, Title 13, Section 2449, which requires that nonessential idling of construction equipment is restricted to five minutes or less. Dec i y ouncil 26 — 368 1/16/20'2 e 19 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 RR AQ-3 Construction activities will be conducted in compliance with any applicable South Coast Air Quality Management District rules and regulations, including but not limited to: • Rule 403, Fugitive Dust, for controlling fugitive dust and avoiding nuisance. Rule 402, Nuisance, which states that a project shall not "discharge from any source whatsoever such quantities of air contaminants or other material which cause injury, detriment, nuisance, or annoyance to any considerable number of persons or to the public, or which endanger the comfort, repose, health or safety of any such persons or the public, or which cause, or have a natural tendency to cause, injury or damage to business or property." Rule 1113, which limits the volatile organic compound content of architectural coatings. • Rule 1466, Soil Disturbance. Projects that involve earth -moving activities of more than 50 cubic yards of soil with applicable toxic air contaminants are subject to this rule. 4.4 Biological Resources 4.4.1 GPU EIR Findings According to the GPU EIR, the City is built out with primarily industrial, commercial, and residential uses. Wildlife habitats within the City are generally limited to open space/vacant parcels, the Santa Ana River, and the Santiago Creek. While no development or land use changes are proposed in the City's open space areas, sensitive species may still be present in Santa Ana and vegetation removal for redevelopment in the City could adversely impact special status species and/or migratory birds. Thus, Mitigation Measure BI0-1 would require screening by a qualified biologist to determine if a site -specific biological resources report is required for projects that disturb vegetated land or major streams. No land use changes are proposed on parcels identified with riparian habitat, sensitive natural communities, or wetlands. Additionally, the City is not within a Natural Community Conservation Plan/Habitat Conservation Plan (NCCP/HCP) area. Thus, the GPU EIR concluded that the General Plan Update would have no impact in those regards. 4.4.2 Project Analysis The project site is located within the General Plan Update West Santa Ana Boulevard Focus Area, which includes 28 open space designated parcels and zero vacant parcels. The project site is urbanized and fully disturbed/developed. The proposed project would renovate a former automotive repair building as the Vista Charter Public Schools district office and redevelop existing surface parking lots into an outdoor community garden, outdoor play field, and outdoor play yard. The project site does not include any wildlife or riparian habitat, sensitive natural communities, or wildlife corridors. Although the project site contains limited ornamental vegetation, the site does not include attributes that would be capable of supporting special status or sensitive plant species, or native resident or migratory species. Additionally, project compliance with RR B-2 would ensure any potential direct or indirect impacts to common bird species comply with California Fish and Game Code Section 3503, which prohibits the take, possession, or needless destruction of any bird's nest or eggs. Further, all proposed activities would occur within Dec i y ouncil 26 — 369 1/16/202 e 20 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 established urbanized areas and not include land uses or activities that would remove or impact any biological resources. No new or substantially more severe impacts would occur compared to the determination in the GPU EIR, and no new mitigation measures are required. As stated, the City is not within an NCCP/HCP area. Therefore, the proposed project would not conflict with an NCCP/HCP or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan. 4.4.3 Conclusion Overall, the project is consistent with the General Plan Update. With implementation of RR B-2 identified in the GPU EIR, the proposed project would not have any specific effects which are peculiar to the project or the site. There are no project -specific impacts or potentially significant off -site or cumulative impacts the GPU EIR failed to analyze, and there are no new significant or substantially more severe biological resource impacts than anticipated by the GPU EIR. Applicable GPU EIR Regulatory Requirements/Mitigation Measures: RR B-2 Regulatory requirement for potential direct/indirect impacts to common and sensitive bird and raptor species will require compliance with the California Fish and Game Code Section 3503. 4.5 Cultural Resources 4.5.1 GPU EIR Findings The GPU EIR concluded that future development under the General Plan Update could adversely impact the City's numerous historical properties listed in national, State, and local registers. However, impacts would be reduced to less than significant levels upon implementation of RR CUL-1 through CUL-6 and Mitigation Measures CUL-1 through CUL-7. Specifically, Mitigation Measure CUL-1 would require a historical resources assessment (HRA) for structures 45 years or older. Mitigation Measure CUL-2 would require the maximum use of the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties with Guidelines for Preserving, Rehabilitating, Restoring and Reconstructing Historic Buildings to ensure that projects involving relocation, conversion, rehabilitation, or alteration of a historic resources would not impair any historical significance. In the event that impacts to historical resources cannot be avoided, Mitigation Measure CUL-3 would require the affected historical resources to be thoroughly documented before issuance of any permits and may also require additional public education efforts and/or memorialization of the historical resource. To reduce impacts to archaeological resources and prior to ground -disturbing activities, Mitigation Measure CUL-4 requires an Archaeological Resources Assessment be conducted under the supervision of a qualitied archaeologist. If potentially significant archaeological resources are identified and impacts cannot be avoided, Mitigation Measure CUL-5 requires a Phase II Testing and Evaluation investigation be performed by a qualified archaeologist. If the Archaeological Resources Assessment does not identify archaeological resources but indicates the project area to be highly sensitive for archeological resources, a qualified archaeologist and a Native American monitor culturally affiliated with the project area must monitor all ground -disturbing activities in the areas of high archaeological sensitivity. Pursuant to Mitigation Measure CUL-7, if the Archaeological Resources Assessment does not identify potentially significant archaeological resources but the site has moderate sensitivity for archaeological resources, a qualified archaeologist must be retained on -call. Overall, implementation of regulatory requirements and Mitigation Measures CUL-1 through CUL-7 would reduce impacts to less than significant levels. Dec i y ouncil 26 — 370 1/16/20'2 e 21 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 4.5.2 Project Analysis The project site is located within the western portion of the West Santa Ana Boulevard Focus Area and does not contain any historical resources as defined by CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(a). Thus, no impacts would occur with regards to historical resources. Although the project would redevelop the shared surface parking lot in the southern portion of the site into an outdoor community garden, play field, and play yard, the proposed project would not require extensive excavation that could uncover previously undiscovered archaeological resources or disturb human remains. Typical excavation depth would be a maximum of four feet for the majority of the site with the deepest excavation of approximately eight feet for an underground infiltration chamber related to stormwater improvements. RR CUL-1 requires that if human remains are discovered within the project site, disturbance of the site must halt until the County coroner has investigated and recommended treatment and disposition of the remains. If the human remains are determined to be Native American in origin, the Native American Heritage Commission must be contacted. Upon implementation of RR CUL-1, impacts would be less than significant in these regards. No new or substantially more severe impacts would occur compared to the determinations of the GPU EIR, and no new mitigation measures are required. 4.5.3 Conclusion As such, the project is consistent with the General Plan Update. With implementation of RR CUL- 1, the proposed project would not have any specific effects which are peculiar to the project or the site. There are no project -specific impacts or potentially significant off -site or cumulative impacts the GPU EIR failed to analyze, and there are no new significant or substantially more severe cultural resource impacts than anticipated by the GPU EIR. Applicable GPU EIR Regulatory Requirements/Mitigation Measures: RR CUL-1 California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 requires that if human remains are discovered within the proposed project site, disturbance of the site shall halt and remain halted until the coroner has investigated the circumstances, manner, and cause of any death, and the recommendations concerning the treatment and disposition of the human remains have been made to the person responsible for the excavation, or to his or her authorized representative. If the coroner determines that the remains are not subject to his or her authority and if the coroner recognizes or has reason to believe the human remains to be those of a Native American, he or she shall contact, by telephone within 24 hours, the Native American Heritage Commission. 4.6 Energy 4.6.1 GPU EIR Findings The GPU EIR determined that implementation of the General Plan Update policies, in conjunction with regulatory requirements, would ensure that energy demand associated with growth under the General Plan Update would not be inefficient, wasteful, or unnecessary. Additionally, the General Plan Update would not conflict with or obstruct a State or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency. Dec i y ouncil 26 — 371 1/16/20'2 e 22 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 4.6.2 Project Analysis ENERGY CONSUMPTION Construction During construction, the project would consume energy in two general forms: (1) the fuel energy consumed by construction vehicles and equipment; and (2) bound energy in construction materials, such as asphalt, steel, concrete, pipes, and manufactured or processed materials such as lumber and glass. Fossil fuels used for construction vehicles and other energy -consuming equipment would be used during building construction, paving, and architectural coatings. Fuel energy consumed during construction would be temporary and would not represent a significant demand on energy resources. In addition, some incidental energy conservation would occur during construction through compliance with State and RR E-1 requirements that heavy-duty diesel equipment not in use for more than five minutes be turned off. Project construction equipment would also be required to comply with the latest U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and CARB engine emissions standards. These emissions standards require highly efficient combustion systems that maximize fuel efficiency and reduce unnecessary fuel consumption. Due to increasing transportation costs and fuel prices, contractors and owners have a strong financial incentive to avoid wasteful, inefficient, and unnecessary consumption of energy during construction. Substantial reductions in energy inputs for construction materials can be achieved by selecting green building materials composed of recycled materials that require less energy to produce than non -recycled materials.12 Compliance with RR E-2 and the integration of green building materials can help reduce environmental impacts associated with the extraction, transport, processing, fabrication, installation, reuse, recycling, and disposal of these building industry source materials.13 The project -related incremental increase in the use of energy bound in construction materials such as asphalt, steel, concrete, pipes and manufactured or processed materials (e.g., lumber and gas) would not substantially increase demand for energy compared to overall local and regional demand for construction materials. The project proposes to remodel and reoccupy an existing building to use as an office building for Vista Charter Public Schools and is not expected to involve any major construction activities or construction of new structures. As such, the project's fuel consumption from off -road construction equipment use would be nominal and would not significantly increase fuel use in the County. Similarly, the project's fuel consumption from on -road construction vehicle use would be nominal and would not significantly increase fuel use in the County. As such, construction would have a nominal effect on the local and regional energy supplies. It is noted that construction fuel use is temporary and would cease upon completion of construction activities. There are no unusual project characteristics that would necessitate the use of construction equipment that would be less energy efficient than at comparable construction sites in the region or State. Therefore, by complying with RR E-1 and E- 2, construction fuel consumption would not be any more inefficient, wasteful, or unnecessary than other similar development projects of this nature. As such, a less than significant impact would occur in this regard. 12 CalRecycle, Green Building Materials, https://www.calrecycle.ca.gov/greenbuiIding/materials#Material, accessed August 15, 2023. 13 Ibid. Dec i y ouncil 26 — 372 1/16/20'2 e 23 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 Operations Transportation Enerav Demand Pursuant to the federal Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975, the National Highway Traffic and Safety Administration is responsible for establishing additional vehicle standards and for revising existing standards. Compliance with federal fuel economy standards is not determined for each individual vehicle model. Rather, compliance is determined based on each manufacturer's average fuel economy for the portion of their vehicles produced for sale in the United States. According to the Vista Heritage Global Academy Expansion Trip Generation Assessment prepared by Urban Crossroads and dated July 24, 2023, the proposed project would generate 84 average daily trips without taking trip reductions from the existing uses as they are currently vacant. As such, with the 84 average daily trips, the project would have a nominal increase the County's automotive fuel consumption. The project does not propose any unusual features that would result in excessive long-term operational fuel consumption. The key drivers of transportation -related fuel consumption are commuting for work and many personal choices on when to drive to the site for various purposes. Those factors are outside of the scope of the design of the proposed project. However, the project would provide on -site bicycle parking and promote the use of alternate mode of transportation. Additionally, an Orange County Transportation Authority bus stop is located less than 0.1 miles to the west of the project site. As such, this project would encourage and support the use of alternative modes of transportation, thus reducing petroleum fuel consumption. Therefore, fuel consumption associated with vehicle trips generated by the project would not be considered inefficient, wasteful, or unnecessary in comparison to other similar developments in the region. A less than significant impact would occur in this regard. Building Energy Demand Compliance with RR E-3 and E-4 would ensure project's compliance with the most current version of the 2022 Title 24 Building Energy Efficiency Standards (commonly known as Title 24), which provide minimum efficiency standards related to various building features, including appliances, water and space heating and cooling equipment, building insulation and roofing, and lighting. Additionally, the project would exceed the 2022 Title 24 standards. Compliance with the current 2022 Title 24 standards significantly reduces energy usage. As modeled in CaIEEMod and detailed in Attachment A, the project would consume 124,742 kilowatt-hour of electricity and 177,425 kilo British thermal units of natural gas per year, which is nominal compared to regional energy consumption. It should be noted that as a conservative analysis, existing uses on -site were not modeled or deducted from project energy consumption. Furthermore, the electricity provider, SCE, is subject to California's Renewables Portfolio Standard (RPS). The RPS requires investor -owned utilities, electric service providers, and community choice aggregators to increase procurement from eligible renewable energy resources to 60 percent of total procurement by 2030, and 100 percent by 2045. Renewable energy is generally defined as energy that comes from resources which are naturally replenished within a human timescale such as sunlight, wind, tides, waves, and geothermal heat. The increase in reliance of such energy resources further ensures that new development projects will not result in the waste of the finite energy resources. Therefore, by using electricity from SCE, the project would be in compliance with RR E-5. As a result, the project would ensure energy consumption to be kept to a minimum through high efficiency lighting, energy efficient appliances, and on -site renewable energy production. Dec i y ouncil 26 — 373 1/16/202 e 24 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 Therefore, the project would not cause wasteful, inefficient, and unnecessary consumption of building energy during project operation, or preempt future energy development or future energy conservation. A less than significant impact would occur in this regard. CONSISTENCY WITH APPLICABLE ENERGY PLANS State and regional plans for renewable energy and energy efficiency include the California Energy Commission's Integrated Energy Policy Report (IEPR), Title 24 standards, and CALGreen standards. The project would exceed 2022 Title 24 and CALGreen standards and incorporate all applicable energy efficiency measures in compliance with RR E-1 through E-5. The project proposes to remodel and reoccupy an existing building to use as an office building for Vista Charter Public School use. The proposed project would be compliant with all applicable goals and all other all applicable goals and policies by incorporating energy-, water- and waste -efficiency building features as per Title 24 standards. The project would also install water efficient features such as low -flow fixtures and water efficient and drought tolerant irrigation system to further reduce water consumption. Compliance with Title 24 and CALGreen standards would ensure the project's consistency with the IEPR building energy efficiency recommendations, which would ensure project conformance with the State's energy reduction goals. Less than significant impacts would occur in this regard. 4.6.3 Conclusion The project is consistent with the General Plan Update. With implementation of RR E-1 through E-5, the proposed project would not have any specific effects which are peculiar to the project or the site. There are no project -specific impacts or potentially significant off -site or cumulative impacts the GPU EIR failed to analyze, and there are no new significant or substantially more severe energy impacts than anticipated by the GPU EIR. Applicable GPU EIR Regulatory Requirements/Mitigation Measures: RR E-1 Construction activities will be conducted in compliance with California Code of Regulations Section 2485, which requires that nonessential idling of construction equipment be restricted to five minutes or less. RR E-2 At least 65 percent of all nonhazardous construction and demolition waste from nonresidential construction associated with future development in the plan area shall be recycled and/or salvaged for reuse in line with the 2016 California Green Building Standards Code Section 5.408 (California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 11). RR E-3 New buildings implemented as part of the General Plan Update are required to achieve the current California Building Energy and Efficiency Standards (California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 6) and California Green Building Standards Code (California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 11). RR E-4 Any appliances associated with development in the Plan Area shall meet the requirements of the 2012 Appliance Efficiency Regulations. RR E-5 Development under the General Plan Update shall support the goals of the renewables portfolio standard, SB 350, and SB 100 to achieve a tiered increase in the use of renewable energy to 60 percent by 2030, and 100 percent by 2045. Dec i y ouncil 26 — 374 1/16/20'2 e 25 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 4.7 Geology and Soils 4.7.1 GPU EIR Findings The GPU EIR concluded that future development under the General Plan Update would be subject to potential seismic -related hazards including strong seismic ground shaking, seismic - related ground failure, and landslides. Further, development associated with the General Plan Update could result in unstable geologic unit or soil conditions, including soil erosion, expansive soils, settlement and collapse, and subsidence. However, implementation of RR G-1, through G- 3 would reduce impacts to less than significant levels. Specifically, RR G-1 and G-2 require development to comply with the most recent version of the California Building Code and Municipal Code Chapter 8, Buildings and Structures, and RR G-3 requires all buildings or structures within the City that require plumbing fixtures be connected to a public sewer per Municipal Code Section 39-51, Mandatory Connections. The GPU EIR also concluded that development under the General Plan Update could impact known and unknown paleontological resources through grading and construction activities of undeveloped areas or redevelopment that requires more intensive soil excavation than in the past. Therefore, Mitigation Measures GEO-1 through GEO- 3 require monitoring based on the sensitivity level of sites for paleontological resources. Overall, the GPU EIR concluded that implementation of regulatory requirements and Mitigation Measures GEO-1 through GEO-3 would reduce geology and soil impacts to less than significant levels. 4.7.2 Project Analysis The project site is located in a seismically active area, as is most of southern California. However, the project site is not located within a State -designated Alquist-Priolo Fault Hazard Zone. The nearest fault to the project site is the Bolsa-Fairview Fault (Newport -Inglewood Rose Canyon fault zone), located approximately 5.5 miles to the southwest. No active faults are known to cross the project site. Additionally, the site is not located in an area identified as a potential landslide hazard area by the State or City. However, the project site is located within an area susceptible to liquefaction. As described above, implementation of RR G-1 and G-2 would reduce impacts in this regard to less than significant levels. Consistent with the General Plan, compliance with existing regulations would ensure the proposed project would not result in a significant impact related to seismic hazards or liquefaction. Construction of the proposed project would involve minimal ground -disturbing activities given the nature of the proposed improvements. As mentioned above, while construction activities may result in the potential for erosion to occur, implementation of RR G-1 and G-2 would reduce impacts in this regard to less than significant levels. Consistent with the General Plan, compliance with existing regulations including implementation of regulatory requirements would ensure the proposed project would not result in a significant impact related to erosion. No new or substantially more severe impacts would occur compared to the determinations of the GPU EIR, and no new mitigation measures are required. Lateral spreading is a type of liquefaction -induced ground failure on mildly sloping ground. However, the project site is located on relatively level ground, and implementation of the proposed project would not increase the risk of landslides. Therefore, no impacts related to lateral spreading would occur. Subsidence is the lowering of surface elevation due to changes occurring underground, such as the extraction of large amounts of groundwater. The proposed project would not involve the extraction of any groundwater, oil, or gas from the project site. Clay -based soils are typically susceptible to expansion. The geologic materials under the project site have very low expansive potential (plasticity index value less than 15) and are classified as non - Dec i y ouncil 26 — 375 1/16/20'2 e 26 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 expansive in accordance with the 2022 California Building Code, Section 1803.5.3.14,15 As such, no impacts related to unstable or expansive soils would occur. In compliance with RR G-3, construction and operation of the proposed project would not involve the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems. As such, compliance with existing regulatory requirements would ensure no impact related to the use of such systems would occur. With regards to paleontological resources, the project site is disturbed and built out in nature; however, sediments in the project site are considered to have paleontological sensitivity increasing with depth. Specifically, the project site is underlain by silty sand of alluvial fan deposits (Qyfsa) which contain "low -to -high" paleontological sensitivity; refer to GPU EIR Figure 5.6-3, Paleontological Sensitivity. As such, in the event of paleontological resource discovery, the proposed project would comply with GPU EIR Mitigation Measure GEO-3, which requires construction work to halt within a 50-foot radius of a find. With adherence to the City's existing requirements for paleontological resources, less than significant impacts related to paleontological resources would occur. 4.7.3 Conclusion Overall, the project is consistent with the General Plan Update. With implementation of RR G-1 and G-2 and Mitigation Measure GEO-3 identified in the GPU EIR, the proposed project would not have any specific effects which are peculiar to the project or the site. There are no project - specific impacts or potentially significant off -site or cumulative impacts the GPU EIR failed to analyze, and there are no new significant or substantially more severe impacts to geology and soils than anticipated by the GPU EIR. Applicable GPU EIR Regulatory Requirements/Mitigation Measures: RR G-1 Every public agency enforcing building regulations must adopt the provisions of the California Building Code (CBC), which is Title 24, Part 2 of the California Code of Regulations. The most recent version is the 2019 CBC (effective January 1, 2020). The CBC is updated every three years and provides minimum standards to protect property and public safety by regulating the design and construction of excavations, foundations, building frames, retaining walls, and other building elements to mitigate the effects of seismic shaking and adverse soil conditions. The CBC also contains provisions for earthquake safety based on factors including occupancy type, the types of soil and rock on -site, and the strength of ground shaking with specified probability of occurring at a site. RR G-2 Santa Ana Municipal Code, Chapter 8, Buildings and Structures. These codes address grading standards, excavation, and fills. This also includes compliance with regulations for unreinforced masonry structures in accordance with "Unreinforced Masonry Law," found in California Government Code §§ 8875 et seq. The City of Santa Ana Building Official may place additional requirements upon the construction of infrastructure, buildings, and other improvements based on the findings from plan check, soils testing, and geotechnical investigations. 14International Code Council, 2022 California Building Code, Title 24, Part 2, https://codes.iccsafe.org/content/CABC2022P1/chapter-18-soils-and-foundations, accessed July 26, 2023. 15 U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Web Soil Survey, https://websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov/app/WebSoilSurvey.aspx, accessed July 26, 2023. Dec 1 y ouncil 26 — 376 1/16/202 e 27 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 RR G-3 Santa Ana Municipal Code Section 39-51 requires that all buildings or structures within the city that require plumbing fixtures must be connected to a public sewer. GEO-3 All Projects. In the event of any fossil discovery, regardless of depth or geologic formation, construction work shall halt within a 50-foot radius of the find until its significance can be determined by a qualified paleontologist. Significant fossils shall be recovered, prepared to the point of curation, identified by qualified experts, listed in a database to facilitate analysis, and deposited in a designated paleontological curation facility in accordance with the standards of the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology (2010). The most likely repository is the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County. The repository shall be identified and a curatorial arrangement shall be signed prior to collection of the fossils. 4.8 Greenhouse Gas Emissions 4.8.1 GPU EIR Findings The GPU EIR determined that implementation of Mitigation Measure GHG-1 would ensure that the City is tracking and monitoring the City's GHG emissions to chart a trajectory to achieve the long-term, year 2050, GHG reduction goal set by Executive Order S-03-05. However, at this time, there is no plan past 2030 that achieves the long-term GHG reduction goal established under Executive Order S-03-05. As identified by the California Council on Science and Technology, the State cannot meet the 2050 goal without major advancements in technology. Advancements in technology in the future could provide additional reductions and allow the State and City to meet the 2050 goal, but in the meantime, the GPU EIR determined that buildout of the General Plan Update would result in significant and unavoidable GHG impacts. However, the GPU EIR determined that the General Plan Update would not conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions. 4.8.2 Project Analysis The following section evaluates the potential GHG impacts that would result from implementation of the proposed project. This analysis is primarily based upon Attachment A, Air Qualitu/Greenhouse Gas/Energy Modelinq Results. THRESHOLDS OF SIGNIFICANCE Amendments to CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.4 were adopted to assist lead agencies in determining the significance of the impacts of GHG emissions and gives lead agencies the discretion to determine whether to assess those emissions quantitatively or qualitatively. This section recommends certain factors to be considered in the determination of significance (i.e., the extent to which a project may increase or reduce GHG emissions compared to the existing environment; whether the project exceeds an applicable significance threshold; and the extent to which the project complies with regulations or requirements adopted to implement a plan for the reduction or mitigation of GHGs). The amendments do not establish a threshold of significance; rather, lead agencies are granted discretion to establish significance thresholds for their respective jurisdictions, including looking to thresholds developed by other public agencies or suggested by other experts, such as the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), so long as any threshold chosen is supported by substantial evidence (CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.7(c)). The California Natural Resources Agency has also clarified that the CEQA Guidelines amendments focus on the effects of GHG emissions as cumulative impacts, and therefore GHG emissions should be analyzed in the context of CEQA's Dec i y ouncil 26 — 377 1/16/202 e 28 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 requirements for cumulative impact analyses (CEQA Guidelines Section 15064(h)(3)).16,17 A project's incremental contribution to a cumulative impact can be found not cumulatively considerable if the project would comply with an approved plan or mitigation program that provides specific requirements to avoid or substantially lessen the cumulative problem within the geographic area of the project.18 The GPU EIR describes that if project emissions are below the 3,000 MTCO2e bright -line screening threshold, GHG emissions impacts would be considered less than significant. As such, the analysis utilizes the 3,000 MTCO2e per year numerical threshold of significance for GHG emissions and the methodology for evaluating the project's impacts related to GHG emissions also focuses on its consistency with Statewide, regional, and local plans adopted for the purpose of reducing and/or mitigating GHG emissions. PROJECT -RELATED GHG EMISSIONS Project -related GHG emissions include emissions from direct and indirect sources. Direct project - related GHG emissions include emissions from construction activities, area sources, mobile sources, and refrigerants, while indirect sources include emissions from energy consumption, water demand, and solid waste generation. The CalEEMod, version 2022.1 was used to calculate project -related GHG emissions. Table 3, Estimated Greenhouse Gas Emissions, presents the estimated CO2, N20, and CH4 emissions associated with the proposed project; refer to Attachment A for the CaIEEMod outputs. "California Natural Resources Agency, Final Statement of Reasons for Regulatory Action, pp. 11-13, 14, 16, December 2009, https://resources.ca.gov/CNRALegacyFiles/ceqa/docs/Final_Statement_of_Reasons.pdf, accessed July 13, 2023. " State of California Governor's Office of Planning and Research, Transmittal of the Governor's Office of Planning and Research's Proposed SB97 CEQA Guidelines Amendments to the Natural Resources Agency, April 13, 2009, https://planning.lacity.org/eir/CrossroadsHwd/deir/files/references/COl.pdf, accessed July 13, 2023. 18 14 CCR Section 15064(h)(3). Dec I y ouncil 26 — 378 1/16/20'2 e 29 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 Table 3 Estimated Greenhouse Gas Emissions Source CO2 CH4 N20 Refrigerants COze Metric Tons/year' Direct Emissions Construction amortized over 30 ears 2.57 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 2.58 Area Source 0.14 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 0.14 Mobile Source 55.10 <0.01 <0.01 0.01 56.00 Refrigerants 0.00 0.00 0.00 <0.01 <0.01 Total Direct Emissions2 57.81 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 58.72 Indirect Emissions Energy 39.50 <0.01 <0.01 0.00 39.70 Solid Waste 0.58 0.06 0.00 0.00 2.03 Water Demand 2.48 0.04 <0.01 0.00 3.78 Total Indirect Emissions2 42.56 0.10 <0.01 0.00 45.51 Total Project -Related Emissionsz 104.23 GPU EIR GHG Significance Threshol'dsl 3,000 MTCO2e Exceeds Thresholds? No Notes: 1. Emissions calculated using California Emissions Estimator Model Version 2022.1 (CaIEEMod) computer model and are based on 7,000 square feet building area as a conservative analysis. 2. Totals may be slightly off due to rounding. Refer to Attachment A, for detailed model in utlout ut data. Direct Project -Related Sources of Greenhouse Gases Construction Emissions. Construction GHG emissions are typically summed and amortized over the lifetime of the project (assumed to be 30 years), then added to the operational emissions.19 The project would comply with RR GHG-1 which restricts non -essential idling of construction equipment and RR GHG-7 which ensures recycling and/or salvaging for reuse at minimum of 65 percent of the nonhazardous construction and demolition waste generated during construction. As shown in Table 3, the proposed project would result in 2.58 MTCO2e per year construction emissions when amortized over 30 years (or a total of 77.3 MTCO2e in 30 years). Area Source. Area source emissions were calculated using CaIEEMod and project -specific land use data. Project -related area sources include natural gas consumption for space heating and exhaust emissions from landscape maintenance equipment, such as lawnmowers, shedders/grinders, blowers, trimmers, chain saws, and hedge trimmers used to maintain the landscaping of the site. The project would directly result in 0.14 MTCO2e per year from area source emissions; refer to Table 3. Mobile Source. CaIEEMod relies upon trip generation rates from the Vista Heritage Global Academy Expansion Trip Generation Assessment prepared by Urban Crossroads and dated July 24, 2023. The proposed project would generate 84 average daily trips without taking trip reduction from the existing uses on -site as they are currently vacant. The project would result in 19 The project lifetime is based on the standard 30-year assumption of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (South Coast Air Quality Management District, Draft Guidance Document - Interim CEQA Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Significance Threshold, October 2008). Dec I y ouncil 26 - 379 1/16/202 e 30 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 approximately 56.00 MTCO2e per year of mobile source generated GHG emissions; refer to Table 3. Refrigerants. Refrigerants are substances used in equipment for air conditioning and refrigeration. Most of the refrigerants used today are HFCs or blends thereof, which can have high GWP values. All equipment that uses refrigerants has a charge size (i.e., quantity of refrigerant the equipment contains), and an operational refrigerant leak rate, and each refrigerant has a GWP that is specific to that refrigerant. CalEEMod quantifies refrigerant emissions from leaks during regular operation and routine servicing over the equipment lifetime, and then derives average annual emissions from the lifetime estimate. The proposed project would result in less than 0.01 MTCO2e per year of GHG emissions from refrigerants; refer to Table 3. Indirect Project -Related Sources of Greenhouse Gases Energy Consumption. Energy consumption emissions were calculated using CalEEMod and project -specific land use data. Southern California Edison (SCE) would provide electricity to the project site. Compliance with RR GHG-1 would ensure project's consistency with 2022 Title 24 standards. The project would also exceed 2022 Title 24 standards, which has been not incorporated in CalEEMod as a conservative analysis. The project would indirectly result in 39.70 MTCO2e per year due to energy consumption; refer to Table 3. Solid Waste. Solid waste associated with operations of the proposed project would result in 2.03 MTCO2e per year; refer to Table 3. Water Demand. The project would comply with RR GHG-3 which ensures adherence to current CALGreen standards that requires increased water efficiency and reduce urban per capita water demand. The project operations would result in a demand of approximately 6.57 million gallons of water per year. Emissions from indirect energy impacts due to water supply would result in 3.78 MTCO2e per year; refer to Table 3. Total Project -Related Sources of Greenhouse Gases As shown in Table 3, the total amount of project -related GHG emissions from direct and indirect sources combined would total 104.23 MTCO2e per year. As such, the project would not exceed the 3,000 MTCO2e bright -line screening threshold and no new impacts would occur. CONSISTENCY WITH APPLICABLE GHG PLANS, POLICIES, OR REGULATIONS The GHG plan consistency analysis for the project is based on the project's consistency with the CARB 2022 Scoping Plan for Achieving Carbon Neutrality (2022 Scoping Plan), and the City's General Plan Update. The 2022 Scoping Plan describes the approach the State will take to achieve carbon neutrality by 2045. The General Plan Update contains goals, policies, and measures that would reduce GHG emissions within the City. Consistency with the 2022 CARB Scoping Plan The 2022 Scoping Plan identifies reduction measures necessary to achieve the goal of carbon neutrality by 2045 or earlier. Actions that reduce GHG emissions are identified for each Assembly Bill (AB) 32 inventory sector. Provided in Table 4, Consistency with the 2022 Scoping Plan: AB 32 GHG Inventory Sectors, is an evaluation of applicable reduction actions/strategies by emissions source category to determine how the project would be consistent with or exceed reduction actions/strategies outlined in the 2022 Scoping Plan. Dec i y ouncil 26 — 380 1/16/20'2 e 31 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 Table 4 Consistency with the 2022 Scoping Plan: AB 32 GHG Inventory Sectors Actions and Strategies Project Consistency Analysis Smart Growth I Vehicles Miles Traveled VMT Reduce VMT per capita to 25% below Consistent. The project would require installation of bicycle parking in 2019 levels by 2030, and 30% below accordance with the 2022 Title 24 standards and CALGreen Code, which would 2019 levels by 2045 promote alternative mode of transportation to reduce VMT. Additionally, the project would be located near an existing Orange County Transportation Authority transit stop. As such, the project would be consistent with this action. New Residential and Commercial Buildin s All electric appliances beginning 2026 Consistent. The project is expected to consist of natural gas heating and/or (residential) and 2029 (commercial), cooking on -site. The City has not adopted an ordinance or program limiting the contributing to 6 million heat pumps use of natural gas for on -site cooking and/or heating. However, if adopted, the installed statewide by 2030 project would comply with the applicable goals or policies limiting the use of natural gas equipment in the future. Furthermore, the project would install high efficiency lighting and appliances. As such, the project would be consistent with this action. Construction Equipment Achieve 25% of energy demand Consistent. The City has not adopted an ordinance or program requiring electrified by 2030 and 75% electrified by electricity -powered construction equipment. However, if adopted, the project 2045 would be required to comply with the applicable goals or policies requiring the use of electric construction equipment in the future. As such, the project would be consistent with this action. Non -combustion Methane Emissions Divert 75% of organic waste from landfills Consistent. Senate Bill (SB) 1383 establishes targets to achieve a 50 percent by 2025 reduction in the level of the Statewide disposal of organic waste from the 2014 level by 2020 and a 75 percent reduction by 2025. The law establishes an additional target that not less than 20 percent of currently disposed edible food is recovered for human consumption by 2025. The project would comply with local and regional regulations and recycle or compost 75 percent of waste by 2025 pursuant to SB 1383. As such, the project would be consistent with this action. Source: California Air Resources Board, 2022 Scoping Plan, November 16, 2022. Consistency with the General Plan Update As previously stated, the project proposes to remodel and reoccupy an existing building to use as an office building. As an infill redevelopment project, the proposed project would require and produce less water, waste, and air quality pollutants compared to a new development. Furthermore, the project would be compliant with General Plan Update Policy 4.1, Policy 4.2, Policy 4.3, Policy 4.4, and Policy 4.5 which incorporate energy-, water- and waste -efficiency building features as per Title 24 standards. The project would also be consistent with General Plan Update Policy 3.11, Policy 1.6, Policy 1.8, and Policy 1.12 by providing bicycle parking spaces on -site and due to the close proximity to the nearby transit station, which would promote alternative modes of transportation. As such, by complying with the City's CAP and Title 24 standards, the project would also be consistent with the applicable GHG goals and policies in the General Plan Update. Consistency Conclusion In summary, the project's characteristics render it consistent with Statewide, regional, and local climate change mandates, plans, policies, and recommendations. More specifically, the GHG plan consistency analysis provided above demonstrates that the project complies with the regulations and GHG reduction goals, policies, actions, and strategies outlined in the 2022 Scoping Plan, and Dec i y ouncil 26 — 381 1/16/20'2 e 32 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 General Plan Update. Consistency with these plans would reduce the impact of the project's incremental contribution of GHG emissions. Accordingly, the project would not conflict with any applicable plan, policy, regulation, or recommendation adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions. Impacts in this regard would be less than significant. 4.8.3 Conclusion Overall, the project is consistent with the General Plan Update. With implementation of RR GHG- 1, GHG-2, GHG-3, and GHG -7, the proposed project would not have any specific effects which are peculiar to the project or the site. There are no project -specific impacts or potentially significant off -site or cumulative impacts the GPU EIR failed to analyze, and there are no new significant or substantially more severe GHG impacts than anticipated by the GPU EIR. Applicable GPU EIR Regulatory Requirements/Mitigation Measures: RR GHG-1 New buildings are required to achieve the current California Building Energy and Efficiency Standards (Title 24, Part 6) and California Green Building Standards Code (CALGreen) (Title 24, Part 11). The 2019 Building and Energy Efficiency Standards were effective on January 1, 2020. The Building Energy and Efficiency Standards and CALGreen are updated tri-annually. RR GHG-2 Construction activities are required to adhere to California Code of Regulations, Title 13, Section 2499, which restricts nonessential idling of construction equipment to five minutes or less. RR GHG-3 New buildings are required to adhere to the California Green Building Standards Code and Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance requirements to increase water efficiency and reduce urban per capita water demand. RR GHG-7 California's Green Building Standards Code (CALGreen) requires the recycling and/or salvaging for reuse at minimum of 65 percent of the nonhazardous construction and demolition waste generated during most "new construction" projects (CALGreen §§ 4.408 and 5.408). Construction contractors are required to submit a construction waste management plan that identifies the construction and demolition waste materials to be diverted from disposal by recycling, reuse on the project, or salvaged for future use or sale and the amount (by weight or volume). 4.9 Hazards and Hazardous Materials 4.9.1 GPU EIR Findings The GPU EIR concluded that buildout of the proposed General Plan Update would include construction activities and operations that would transport, use, or dispose of hazardous materials in proximity to environmental justice (EJ) communities (i.e., disadvantaged communities). Such activity could create a significant hazard to the public or the environment given the proximity of hazardous materials sites which are considered open cases, existing lead -contaminated soils, existing buildings containing asbestos -containing materials (ACM) and/or lead -based paint (LBP), and existing and planned industrial uses throughout the City. Further, there are parts of the City that are within the vicinity of the John Wayne Airport Compatibility Land Use Plan. However, the existing federal, State, and regional regulatory framework regarding hazardous materials is substantial and would apply to all future construction and operation of uses within the City. Further, the GPU EIR included regulatory requirements that are specific to existing hazards and Dec i y ouncil 26 — 382 1/16/202 e 33 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 hazardous materials conditions in the City. Compliance with all applicable regulations would be required of future development in the City and would reduce the proposed General Plan Update's impacts related to hazards or hazardous materials to a less than significant level. According to GPU EIR Figure 2-1, EJ Communities, Neighborhoods, and Focus Areas, the project site is located within an EJ community. However, the proposed project would neither develop any new industrial uses, nor be located on or adjacent to a site listed under Table 5.8-5, Existing Hazardous Materials Sites, of the GPU EIR. Construction activities would use limited amounts of hazardous materials in the form of paints, solvents, glues, roofing materials, and other common construction materials for the proposed building remodel and outdoor play area. Construction activities may include the use of machinery and other equipment that require fueling or maintenance/servicing. These types of materials are not acutely hazardous, and all storage, handling, use, transport, and disposal of these would be required to conform to existing laws and regulations of the California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC), United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA), Occupational Safety & Health Administration (OSHA), and Orange County Health Care Agency (OCHCA) Environmental Health Division, which would ensure that all potentially hazardous materials are used and handled in an appropriate manner and would minimize the potential for safety impacts to occur. Additionally, the storage, handling, use, transport, and disposal of these hazardous materials would cease once construction is complete. Project compliance with RR HAZ-1 would ensure hazardous materials and hazardous wastes are transported in compliance with any applicable State and federal requirements; RR HAZ-2 would ensure hazardous waste generation, transportation, treatment, storage, and disposal would be conducted in compliance with Subtitle C of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, Part 263); RR HAZ-4 would ensure demolition activities that could expose works or the public to ACMs or LBPs would be conducted in accordance with any applicable State and federal requirements, and RR HAZ-5 would ensure removal of hazardous materials be conducted as outlined in 29 CFR 1910.120 and 8 CCR 5192. Therefore, with adherence to existing regulations, impacts related to the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials and accidental release of hazardous materials would be less than significant. 4.9.2 Project Analysis Vista Heritage Global Academy is adjacent to the south of the project site. As stated above, the proposed project would comply with existing regulations to minimize the risks associated with the exposure of sensitive receptors, including the existing school, to hazardous materials to a less than significant level. The types of uses that would emit or release hazardous or acutely hazardous materials into the environment are typically industrial manufacturing facilities, which is not proposed within the project site. The project would renovate an unused, vacant automobile repair building with a school district office and provide outdoor areas for existing students at the Vista Heritage Global Academy. Although the project site is located within 0.25-mile of an existing school, hazardous materials are not typically associated with the proposed institutional (i.e., district office) or recreational (i.e., play yard and play field) uses. Anticipated hazardous materials use during project operations may include minor cleaning products and the occasional use of pesticides and herbicides for landscape maintenance. Further, while the site is located adjacent to an existing railroad alignment, it is currently under construction for future electric street cars. Compliance with applicable laws and regulations regarding the handling and transport of hazardous materials, including RR HAZ-1, HAZ-2, HAZ-4, and HAZ-5 would ensure impacts would be less than significant. The project site is not listed in the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) GeoTracker system which includes leaking underground fuel tank sites and spills, leaks, investigations, and Dec i y ouncil 26 — 383 1/16/202 e 34 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 cleanups sites; or the DTSC EnviroStor Data Management System which includes Cortese sites; or the U.S. EPA's database of regulated facilities.20 As such, impacts related to hazardous materials sites would be less than significant. The John Wayne Airport is adjacent to the City's southeast boundary. The project site is approximately five miles northwest of the John Wayne Airport. The John Wayne Airport Compatibility Land Use Plan regulates land use development within the vicinity of the airport. According to Figure 5.8-5, John Wayne Airport Safety Compatibility Zones, and Figure 5.8-6, Height Restrictions per Federal Air Regulations Part 77, of the GPU EIR, the project site is located outside of the John Wayne Airport's safety compatibility zone and height restriction areas. As such, the proposed project would not result in a safety hazard or excessive noise for people residing and working in the project area. Impacts would be less than significant. Construction equipment and materials staging would occur within the project site. During construction, vehicular access would be provided via existing access points along North Fairview Street and West 5th Street. Operation of the proposed project would not result in population growth or changes to the existing circulation system. All driveways would be 20 feet in width; the modified student drop-off and pick-up area would have a 20-foot turn radius and 72-foot-wide turnaround, providing a more immediate point of access to the proposed development from West 5th Street and adequate space for emergency vehicle access. As such, the proposed project would not interfere with operations of the City's Emergency Operations Center and would not interfere with operations of emergency response agencies or with coordination and cooperation between such agencies; thus, impacts to emergency response planning would be less than significant. The City of Santa Ana is not in a designated fire hazard zone. As such, no impact related to the risk of wildland fires would occur. 4.9.3 Conclusion Overall, the project is consistent with buildout of the General Plan Update. With implementation of RR HAZ-1, HAZ-2, HAZ-4, and HAZ-5 identified in the GPU EIR, the proposed project would not have any specific effects which are peculiar to the project or the site. There are no project specific impacts or potentially significant off -site or cumulative impacts the GPU EIR failed to analyze, and there are no new significant or substantially more severe impacts to hazards and hazardous materials than anticipated by the GPU EIR. Applicable GPU EIR Regulatory Requirements/Mitigation Measures: RR HAZ-1 Hazardous materials and hazardous wastes will be transported to and/or from projects developed under the General Plan Update in compliance with any applicable state and federal requirements, including the U.S. Department of Transportation regulations listed in the Code of Federal Regulations (Title 49, Hazardous Materials Transportation Act); California Department of Transportation standards; and the California Occupational Safety and Health Administration standards. RR HAZ-2 Hazardous waste generation, transportation, treatment, storage, and disposal will be conducted in compliance with Subtitle C of the Resource Conservation and 20 California Environmental Protection Agency, Cortese Listing, https://calepa.ca.gov/sitecleanup/corteselist/, accessed July 6, 2023. Dec I y ouncil 26 — 384 1/16/202 e 35 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 Recovery Act (Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, Part 263), including the management of nonhazardous solid wastes and underground tanks storing petroleum and other hazardous substances. The projects developed under the General Plan Update will be designed and constructed in accordance with the regulations of the Orange County Health Care Agency, Environmental Health Division, which serves as the designated Certified Unified Program Agency. RR HAZ-4 Demolition activities that have the potential to expose construction workers and/or the public to asbestos -containing materials or lead -based paint will be conducted in accordance with applicable regulations, including, but not limited to: • South Coast Air Quality Management District's Rule 1403 • California Health and Safety Code (Section 39650 et seq.) • California Code of Regulations (Title 8, Section 1529) • California Occupational Safety and Health Administration regulations (California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 1529 [Asbestos] and Section 1532.1 [Lead]) • Code of Federal Regulations (Title 40, Part 61 [asbestos], Title 40, Part 763 [asbestos], and Title 29, Part 1926 [asbestos and lead]). RR HAZ-5 The removal of hazardous materials, such as polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), mercury -containing light ballast, and mold, will be completed in accordance with applicable regulations pursuant to 40 CFR 761 (PCBs), 40 CFR 273 (mercury - containing light ballast), and 29 CFR 1926 (molds) by workers with the hazardous waste operations and emergency response (HAZWOPER) training, as outlined in 29 CFR 1910.120 and 8 CCR 5192. 4.10 Hydrology and Water Quality 4.10.1 GPU EIR Findings The GPU EIR concluded that compliance with local, State, and federal regulations and the policies of the proposed General Plan Update would reduce buildout impacts related to groundwater, drainage, hydrology, and water quality. Individual projects would be required to incorporate project -specific source control and treatment Best Management Practices (BMPs), incorporate low impact design (LID)/site design, and comply with applicable regulatory requirements to ensure compliance with regulations governing water quality (e.g., the City's Local Implementation Plan [LIP], Orange County Drainage Area Management Plan and National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System [NPDES] Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System [MS4] Permit from the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board (RR HYD-4), and the City's Model Water Quality Management Plan [WQMP]). 4.10.2 Project Analysis Construction activities have the potential to degrade water quality through the exposure of surface runoff to exposed soils, dust, and other debris at the project site as well as increase erosion and/or siltation. As the project would develop a 0.9-acre site, the project would not be required to obtain coverage under the NPDES Construction General Permit (CGP). However, project compliance Dec i y ouncil 26 — 385 1/16/202 e 36 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 with RR HYD-5 would ensure adherence to Municipal Code Chapter 18 Article IV regarding prohibitions on illicit connections and discharges, urban runoff control measures, and permit requirements. As a result, water quality impacts associated with construction activities would be less than significant. As the project would introduce new uses (i.e., office and outdoor areas) to the project site, development of a WQMP consistent with the prevailing terms and conditions of the City's LIP, Orange County Drainage Area Management Plan and NPDES MS4 Permit from the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board, i.e., RR HYD-4, and the City's Model WQMP would be required. The WQMP would include LID/site design and project -specific BMPs to ensure water quality standards or waste discharge requirements are not violated, and to prevent substantial erosion or siltation on- or offsite. Further, existing drainage facilities within the public right-of-way (i.e., West 5th Street and North Fairview Street) would be maintained. Therefore, with compliance to existing regulations to control construction stormwater runoff during operation, impacts related to water quality standards, waste discharge requirements, and storm water drainage would be less than significant, consistent with the General Plan Update. Given the proposed uses, the project would not result in substantial population growth within Santa Ana. According to the GPU EIR, projected water demand from the proposed General Plan Update at buildout, including development of the proposed project, is well within the projected total water demand for 2040 in the City of Santa Ana 2015 Urban Water Management Plan for normal, dry year, and multiple dry year scenarios. Additionally, because the project site was formerly occupied by automotive repair businesses and associated parking area, development of the proposed project would not interfere with groundwater recharge. Therefore, consistent with the General Plan Update, the proposed project would result in less than significant impacts related to groundwater. The GPU EIR determined that sites within the West Santa Ana Boulevard Focus Area that would be updated from single-family to multi -family residential use would become areas with increased impervious surfaces, and as a consequence, areas of increased stormwater runoff peak flows compared to pre -project conditions. The proposed project would renovate an existing building, formerly occupied by automobile repair businesses, into an office building; no change in density is proposed and the building footprint would not change from existing conditions. Additionally, the project proposes new landscaped areas, including a community garden, play field, and play yard, where paved surface parking currently exists. As such, the project would reduce the amount of impervious areas on the project site compared to existing conditions. According to Figure 5.9-4, City of Santa Ana Flood Zones, of the GPU EIR, the project site is not within a 100-year flood hazard area as designated by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). According to Figure 5.9-5, Dam Inundation Areas, of the GPU EIR, the project site is within both the Santiago Creek Dam and Prado Dam inundation areas. However, the Santiago Creek Dam has been assessed by the California Division of Safety of Dams (DSOD) to have no existing or potential dam safety deficiencies and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' Dam Safety Program is actively implementing risk -reduction measures to remediate the Prado Dam, including routine inspections and ongoing monitoring, spillway modifications to improve downstream flow, and public outreach, to ensure potential inundation hazards are minimized or eliminated.21 The GPU EIR determined that seiche occurrence is lower within inundation zones, 21 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Corps reclassifies Prado Damn, implements risk -reduction measures, https://www.spl.usace.army. mil/Media/News-Releases/Article/1849301 /corps-reclassifies-prado-dam-implements- risk-reduction-measures/, May 15, 2019. Dec I y ouncil 26 — 386 1/16/202 e 37 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 and that the City is too far inland to be at risk of a tsunamis. As such, implementation of the proposed project would result in less than significant impacts in this regard. 4.10.3 Conclusion Overall, the project is consistent with the General Plan Update. With implementation of RRs HYD- 4 and HYD-5 identified in the GPU EIR, the proposed project would not have any specific effects which are peculiar to the project or the site. There are no project specific impacts or potentially significant off -site or cumulative impacts the GPU EIR failed to analyze, and there are no new significant or substantially more severe impacts to hydrology and water quality than anticipated by the GPU EIR. Applicable GPU EIR Regulatory Requirements/Mitigation Measures: RR HYD-4 All development pursuant to the General Plan Update shall comply with the requirements of the Orange County MS4 Permit (Order R8-2009-0030, NPDES No. CAS618030, as amended by Order No. R8-2010 0062). The MS4 Permit requires new development and redevelopment projects to: • Control contaminants into storm drain systems • Educate the public about stormwater impacts • Detect and eliminate illicit discharges • Control runoff from construction sites • Implement best management practices and site -specific runoff controls and treatments for new development and redevelopment. RR HYD-5 All development pursuant to the General Plan Update shall comply with the requirements detailed in Chapter 18 Article IV of the Santa Ana Municipal Code. 4.11 Land Use and Planning 4.11.1 GPU EIR Findings The GPU EIR concluded that the General Plan Update's policies would encourage the preservation or enhancement of the existing residential communities through infill development, open space opportunities, and development of compatible uses that would enhance the existing character of the City. A primary goal of the General Plan Update is to preserve and improve the character and integrity of existing neighborhoods and districts; specific policies would reduce the conflict between contrasting land uses and enhance neighborhoods by responsibly integrating new development into existing communities. None of the changes in the General Plan Update would affect plans, policies, or regulations of other agencies that have jurisdiction within the City, including the Airport Environs Land Use Plan for the John Wayne Airport, the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) Congestion Management Plan, and the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) 2020-2045 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS). As individual projects are considered by the City, each would be subject to a variety of federal, State, and locally adopted plans designed to mitigate environmental impacts or to preserve important resources. As such, impacts associated with the General Plan Update with regards to land use and planning would be less than significant. Dec i y ouncil 26 — 387 1/16/20'2 e 38 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 4.11.2 Project Analysis The proposed project would remodel and reoccupy a building formerly occupied by an automotive repair use as an office building for Vista Charter Public Schools. The project would also redevelop the shared surface parking lot into an outdoor area consisting of a community garden, a play field, and a play yard for administrative staff and existing students associated with the adjacent school; the outdoor areas would not be open to the public. Ancillary improvements include landscaping fencing along the perimeters of the proposed outdoor areas, and expansion of the existing parking lot. Similar to existing conditions, the site would remain accessible from North Fairview Street via two driveways to the west, and two alleys connecting to West 5th Street to the south and southeast. The student drop-off and pick-up area and internal site circulation would be slightly modified to accommodate the outdoor learning garden space and the outdoor play areas. The project site is not within a residential community; it is surrounded by industrial uses, with nearby residential uses separated by an existing railroad alignment. As such, development of the proposed project would not divide any established surrounding residential community. The project is subject to the policies and/or regulations of the General Plan Update and Municipal Code at the local level. As previously stated, the project site has a land use designation of Industrial/Flex-Low (FLEX-1.5) and is within the Light Industrial (Ml) and Specific Development No. 82 (SD-82) zones. The FLEX-1.5 designation allows for various office uses, a maximum FAR of 1.5 and a maximum building height of three stories. The proposed project would renovate an existing 5,837-square foot building as an office building for Vista Charter Public Schools. The building is located on a 0.9-acre (39,204 square -foot) site, thus providing an FAR of 0.15. The existing building height would remain the same at 19 feet and four inches. As such, the project would meet the design standards of the FLEX-1.5 designation. Further, as detailed in Table 5, General Plan Update Land Use Element Project Consistency Analysis, the proposed project would be consistent with the applicable General Plan Update Land Use Element goals and policies. Table 5 General Plan Update Land Use Element Project Consistency Analysis Applicable General Plan Land Use Policies Project Consistency Analysis Goal LU-1: Provide a land use plan that improves quality of life and respects our existing community. Policy LU-1.1: Foster compatibility between land uses to Consistent. Industrial, commercial, institutional, and residential uses enhance livability and promote healthy lifestyles. surround the project site, including Vista Heritage Global Academy and Templo Calvario Church, which both share parking with the project site, and office uses to the south and the Romero -Cruz Academy to the west. The project proposes to remodel and reoccupy a building formerly occupied by an automotive repair use as an office building for use as Vista Charter Public Schools district office. The project would also redevelop the shared surface parking lot in the southern portion of the site into an outdoor area consisting of a community garden, a play field, and a play yard. Outdoor areas would serve existing students of the adjoining Vista Heritage Global Academy. Overall, the redevelopment of the project site would be compatible with the adjoining institutional uses. Dec i y ouncil 26 — 388 1/16/20'2 e 39 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 Table 5 [cont'd] General Plan Update Land Use Element Project Consistency Analysis Applicable General Plan Land Use Policies Project Consistency Analysis Policy LU-1.3: Promote the creation of new open space Consistent. According to the GPU EIR, the project site is located and community -serving amenities in park -deficient within an EJ community. The project would redevelop the shared areas that keeps pace with the increase in multi -unit surface parking lot in the southern portion of the site into an outdoor housing development, with priority given to those that area consisting of an approximately 2,297-square-foot community are also within environmental justice area boundaries. garden, an approximately 7,372-square-foot play field, and an approximately 4,640-square-foot play yard. The outdoor areas would serve existing students of the adjoining Vista Heritage Global Academy. Policy LU-1.8: Ensure that new development projects Consistent. Refer to responses to Policies LU-1.1 and LU-1.3 above. provide a net community benefit. The project would renovate a currently vacant building into a school district office and redevelop a surface parking lot into community and student -serving open space areas. Policy LU-1.9: Evaluate individual new development Consistent. The proposed project would remodel and reoccupy an proposals to determine if the proposals are consistent existing building for use as school district office and include outdoor with the General Plan and to ensure that they do not recreation areas and parking. The intent of the evaluation throughout compound existing public facility and service this document is to minimize adverse physical effects on the deficiencies. environment due to project implementation, including potential inconsistencies with the General Plan and/or increased demand on public services and facilities. Potential adverse effects on the environment related to the development of the proposed project have been evaluated in this document, and specifically throughout this table and in Section 4.15, Public Services. Goal LU-2: Provide a balance of land uses that meet Santa Ana's diverse needs. Policy LU-2.3: Provide a diversity of land uses that Consistent. The project would redevelop an existing surface parking support residents, visitors, and businesses, such as lot into a community garden. Additionally, the project would construct open space, areas for community gatherings, and a play field and play yard for students at Vista Heritage Global outdoor entertainment venues. Academy to use for open sace/recreational activities. Policy LU-2.6: Promote rehabilitation of properties and Consistent. Under existing conditions, the project site is developed encourage increased levels of capital investment to with a former automobile repair business and shares surface parking create a safe and attractive environment. with a neighboring school and church. The project proposes to redevelop the site and renovate the existing building into the Vista Charter Public Schools district office, inclusive of a community garden, play field, play yard, additional parking, and landscaping. Policy LU-2.9: Establish and maintain public open space Consistent. Refer to response to Policies LU-1.3, LU-1.8, and LU- and recreation requirements for new residential and 2.3 above. nonresidential uses to provide sufficient open space and recreational opportunities for Santa Ana residents and visitors. Goal LU-3: Preserve and improve the character and i tegrity of existing neighborhoods and districts. Policy LU-3.1: Support new development which Consistent. Refer to response to Policy LU-1.8 above. provides a net community benefit and contributes to neighborhood character and identity. Policy LU-3.4: Ensure that the scale and massing of Consistent. The project would redevelop an existing building; the new development is compatible and harmonious with project footprint and building height would be similar to existing the surrounding built environment. conditions and would comply with the design standards of the FLEX- 1.5 land use designation. Thus, the project would be compatible with other existing buildings in the Fairview Business Park. Dec i y ounci1 26 — 389 1/16/202 e 40 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 Table 5 [cont'd] General Plan Update Land Use Element Project Consistency Analysis Applicable General Plan Land Use Policies Project Consistency Analysis Goal LU-4: Support a sustainable Santa Ana through improvements to the built environment and a culture of collaboration. Policy LU-4.3: Encourage land uses and strategies that Consistent. As an infill redevelopment project, the proposed district reduce energy and water consumption, waste and noise office and outdoor areas would require/produce less water, waste, generation, soil contamination, air quality impacts, and soil contamination, and air quality pollutants compared to a new light pollution. development. Policy LU-4.8: Collaborate with property owners, Consistent. The project would redevelop the shared surface parking community organizations, and other local stakeholders lot in the southern portion of the site into an outdoor area consisting to identify opportunities for additional open space and of an approximately 2,297-square-foot community garden, an community services, such as community gardens and approximately 7,372-square-foot play field, and an approximately gathering places. 4,640-square-foot play yard. The outdoor areas would serve existing students of the adjoining Vista Heritage Global Academy. Policy LU-4.9: Encourage public, private and Consistent. Refer to responses to Policies LU-1.3, LU-1.8, and LU- commercial recreational facilities in areas that are park 2.3 above. and open space deficient. Source: City of Santa Ana, Golden City Beyond, Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Element, April 2022. Per RR LU-1, the project must comply with the applicable provisions of Chapter 41 (Zoning) of the City of Santa Ana Municipal Code. Permitted uses in the SD-82 zone are the uses permitted in the M1 zone as specified in Municipal Code Chapter 41, Article III, Division 18, M1 (Light Industrial), and schools by right and churches with a conditional use permit. Further, it is noted that the operational and development standards for the permitted and conditionally permitted Light Industrial Uses within the SD-82 zone shall be consistent with the operational and development standards found in Municipal Code Chapter 41, Article III, Division 18. To allow the use of the former automotive repair building for the proposed office use, a Zone Change would be required to modify the existing M1 zone to SD-82 to be consistent with the majority of the Fairview Business Park. In addition to the proposed Zone Change, the project also proposes a Zoning Ordinance Amendment to amend the operational standards of the SD-82 zoning district to allow outdoor play areas. Under current SD-82 provisions, play areas for children are limited to indoors only. Upon approval of the above entitlements, the proposed project would be consistent with the requirements of the General Plan Update and project site's zoning, and would not conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect. Impacts would be less than significant. 4.11.3 Conclusion As such, the project is consistent with the General Plan Update. With implementation of RR LU- 1 identified in the GPU EIR, the proposed project would not have any specific effects which are peculiar to the project or the site. There are no project specific impacts or potentially significant off -site or cumulative impacts the GPU EIR failed to analyze, and there are no new significant or substantially more severe impacts to land use and planning than anticipated by the GPU EIR. Applicable GPU EIR Regulatory Requirements/Mitigation Measures: RR LU-1 Development associated with the General Plan Update would be designed and constructed in accordance with the applicable provisions of Chapter 41 (Zoning) of the City of Santa Ana Municipal Code. Development within specific plan areas, overlay areas, and specific development districts would implement zoning and Dec i y ouncil 26 — 390 1/16/202 e 41 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 development standards that are applicable within these subareas in addition to those in the underlying zoning district. 4.12 Mineral Resources 4.12.1 GPU EIR Findings According to the GPU EIR, the City does not have mineral resource sectors or active or inactive mines. Thus, implementation of the General Plan Update would not cause a loss of availability of known mineral resources. The City is mostly mapped as Mineral Resource Zone (MRZ) 3, which is an area where the significance of mineral deposits cannot be determined from available data. The area in the southeast portion of the City is mapped as MRZ-1, which means an area where no significant mineral resources are present or there is little likelihood that significant mineral resources are present. A small area in the northeast corner of the City is mapped as MRZ-2, which means significant mineral resources are known or very likely. However, the GPU EIR determined that no loss of availability of a known mineral resource would occur, and impacts would be less than significant. 4.12.2 Project Analysis According to Figure 5.11-1, Mineral Resource Zones, of the GPU EIR, which was adapted from the California Division of Mines and Geology map of mineral resource zones around the City, the project site, like most of Santa Ana, is mapped as MRZ-3. Therefore, implementation of the proposed project would not result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State and would not result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local General Plan, specific plan, or other land use plan. Therefore, consistent with the General Plan Update, no impact to mineral resources would occur. 4.12.3 Conclusion As such, the project is consistent with buildout of the General Plan Update. The proposed project would not have any specific effects which are peculiar to the project or the site. There are no project specific impacts or potentially significant off -site or cumulative impacts the GPU EIR failed to analyze, and there are no new significant or substantially more severe impacts to mineral resources than anticipated by the GPU EIR. Applicable GPU EIR Regulatory Requirements/Mitigation Measures: No GPU EIR regulatory requirements or mitigation measures apply. 4.13 Noise 4.13.1 GPU EIR Findings The GPU EIR concluded that implementation of the General Plan Update would result in significant temporary and permanent increases of noise levels throughout the City. Future development in accordance with the General Plan Update would generate both short-term and long-term noise level increases that may impact sensitive receptors. Implementation of the General Plan Update would include regulations designed to protect new sensitive land uses from excessive noise levels. Dec i y ouncil 26 — 391 1/16/20'2 e 42 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 The GPU EIR described that Mitigation Measure N-1 would reduce potential noise impacts during construction to the extent feasible. However, due to the potential for proximity of construction activities to sensitive uses, the number of construction projects potentially occurring simultaneously, and the potential duration of construction activities, construction noise could result in a temporary substantial increase in noise levels above ambient conditions. Therefore, impacts would remain significant and unavoidable. The GPU EIR determined that buildout of the General Plan Update would cause substantial traffic noise to increase on local roadways and could locate sensitive receptors in areas that exceed established noise standards. While Mitigation Measure N-2 would reduce potential interior noise impacts to future noise sensitive receptors below thresholds, there are no feasible or practical mitigation measures available to reduce project -generated traffic noise to less than significant levels for existing residences along affected roadways. Thus, the GPU EIR determined that traffic noise would remain a significant and unavoidable impact. The GPU EIR discussed that construction activity would generate varying degrees of ground vibration, depending on the construction procedures and equipment, that has the potential to exceed the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) criteria for architectural damage (e.g., 0.12 inches per second peak particle velocity (PPV) for fragile or historical resources, 0.2 inches/second PPV for non -engineered timber and masonry buildings, and 0.3 inches/second PPV for engineered concrete and masonry). The GPU EIR determined that implementation of Mitigation Measure N-2 and adherence to associated performance standards, would reduce impacts to less than significant levels. 4.13.2 Project Analysis The following section evaluates potential short- and long-term noise and ground -borne vibration impacts that would result from the proposed project. THRESHOLDS OF SIGNIFICANCE Exterior Noise Standards Chapter 18, Article VI, Noise Control, of the Municipal Code provides criteria for ambient noise measurements as well as noise standards for residential, school, hospital, and church use. When non -transportation (stationary) noise is the noise source of concern, the City applies performance standards from Municipal Code Section 18.312, Exterior Noise Standards, to ensure that noise producers do not adversely affect noise -sensitive land uses. Table 6, Exterior Noise Standards, summarizes the City's exterior noise standards. Table 6 Exterior Noise Standards Time Period Noise Levels dBA L50 L25 Ls L2 Lmax 7:00 a.m. -10:00 p.m. 55 60 65 70 75 10:00 p.m. - 7:00 a.m. 50 55 60 65 70 Note: A 5 dBA penalty shall be applied in the event of an alleged offensive noise such as impact noise, simple tones, speech, music, or an combination of thereof. If the measured ambient level exceeds any of the first four noise limit categories, the allowable noise exposure standard shall be increased to reflect the ambient noise level. If the ambient noise level exceeds the fifth noise limit category, the maximum allowable noise level under this category shall be increased to reflect the maximum ambient noise level. Source: City of Santa Ana, Santa Ana Municipal Code, Section 18.312, Exterior Noise Standards. Dec i y ouncil 26 — 392 1/16/20'2 e 43 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 Construction Noise Standards The City's noise ordinance exempts noise from construction activities that occur during the daytime. No construction is permitted outside of the hours identified in Municipal Code Section 18-314(e). Specifically, construction activities are restricted to the daytime hours of 7:00 am to 8:00 pm, Monday through Saturday. No construction activities are permitted on Sundays or federal holidays. Additionally, the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) established construction noise threshold of 80 dBA Leq for long-term construction projects, which is conservatively used to analyze the project's construction noise impact. Existing Conditions The project vicinity is characterized by mostly residential and commercial land uses, with urban - related activities (i.e., auto repair mechanical equipment and parking areas) being the primary sources of stationary noise. Most of the existing noise in the project area is generated from traffic along surrounding roadways including North Fairview Street and West 5th Street. Noise Measurements In order to quantify existing ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project site, Michael Baker International (Michael Baker) conducted three noise measurements on June 28, 2023; refer to Attachment B, Noise Data. The noise measurement sites were representative of typical existing noise exposure within and immediately adjacent to the project site. The three ten-minute measurements were taken between 11:00 a.m. and 12:00 p.m. Short-term (Leq) measurements are considered representative of the noise levels throughout the day and relate closely with the noise standards for the project area; refer to Table 7, Noise Measurements. Table 7 Noise Measurements Site No. Location Leq (dBA) Lmin (dBA) Lmax (dBA) Time 1 Northeast of Romero -Cruz Academy building 72.4 87.7 49.9 11:08 a.m. 2 Vista Heritage Global Academy 66.2 80.7 46.5 11:26 a.m. 3 1 Cul-de-sac of West 7th Street 1 51.1 1 79.6 1 41.1 1 11:45 a.m. Notes: dBA = A -weighted decibels, Leq = Equivalent Sound Level; Lmin = Minimum Sound Level; Lmax = Maximum Sound Level, Peak = Highest Instantaneous Sound Level Source: Michael Baker International, May 18, 2023. Meteorological conditions were partly cloudy skies, warm temperatures, with light wind speeds (6 miles per hour), and low humidity. Noise monitoring equipment used for the ambient noise survey consisted of a Bruel & Kjaer Hand-held Analyzer Type 2250 equipped with a Type 4189 pre - polarized microphone. The monitoring equipment complies with applicable requirements of the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) for sound level meters. Noise Sensitive Receptors Noise -sensitive land uses are generally considered to include those uses where noise exposure could result in health -related risks to individuals, as well as places where quiet is an essential element of their intended purpose. Residential dwellings are of primary concern because of the potential for increased and prolonged exposure of individuals to both interior and exterior noise levels. Additional land uses such as parks, historic sites, cemeteries, and recreation areas are considered sensitive to increases in exterior noise levels. Schools, churches, hotels, libraries, and Dec i y ouncil 26 — 393 1/16/20'2 e 44 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 other places where low interior noise levels are essential are also considered noise -sensitive land uses. The closest sensitive receptors to the project site are residential uses located approximately 100 feet to the north of the project site and the existing Romero -Cruz Academy School is located approximately 100 feet to the west. PROJECT -GENERATED NOISE IMPACTS It is difficult to specify noise levels that are generally acceptable to everyone; noise that is considered a nuisance to one person may be unnoticed by another. Standards may be based on documented complaints in response to documented noise levels or based on studies of the ability of people to sleep, talk, or work under various noise conditions. Short-term Construction Impacts The project involves remodeling activities associated with paving, building construction, and architectural coating applications and would be completed in approximately eight months. Typical noise levels generated by construction equipment are shown in Table 8, Maximum Noise Levels Generated by Typical Construction Equipment. Operating cycles for these types of construction equipment may involve one or two minutes of full power operation followed by three to four minutes at lower power settings. Other primary sources of acoustical disturbance would be due to random incidents, which would last less than one minute (such as dropping large pieces of equipment or the hydraulic movement of machinery lifts). Construction noise levels in the project vicinity would fluctuate depending on the particular type, number, and duration of usage for the varying equipment. The effects of construction noise largely depend on the type of construction activities occurring on any given day, noise levels generated by those activities, distances to noise -sensitive receptors, and the existing ambient noise environment in the receptor's vicinity. Construction generally occurs in several discrete phases, with each phase requiring different equipment with varying noise characteristics. These phases alter the characteristics of the noise environment generated on the proposed project site and in the surrounding community for the duration of the construction process. Table 8 Maximum Noise Levels Generated by Typical Construction Equipment Type of Equipment Acoustical Use Factor' Lmax at 50 Feet (dBA) Lmax at 100 Feet dBA Compressor 40 78 72 Crane 40 82 75 Concrete Mixer Truck 40 76 73 Forklift 40 85 72 Paver 50 77 71 Roller 20 80 74 Tractor 40 84 78 Water Truck 40 80 1 1 74 Note: 1. Acoustical Use Factor (percent): Estimates the fraction of time each piece of construction equipment is operating at full power (i.e., its loudest condition) during a construction operation. Source: Federal Highway Administration, Roadway Construction Noise Model FHWA-HEP-05-054 , January 2006. Noise levels depicted in Table 8 represent maximum sound levels (Lmax), which are the highest individual sound occurring at an individual time period. The closest sensitive receptors to the Dec i y ouncil 26 — 394 1/16/202 e 45 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 project site are single-family residences and the Romero -Cruz Academy School located approximately 100 feet to the north and west of the project site, respectively. As shown in Table 8, construction noise levels could range between 71 dBA and 78 dBA at 100 feet. Although sensitive receptors may be exposed to increased noise levels during project construction, construction noise levels would not exceed the FTA threshold of 80 dBA. In addition, construction activities are exempt from the City's thresholds as it is a normal part in the urban life. Furthermore, compliance with RR NOI-2 would ensure that the project construction activities would comply with the City's Noise Ordinance detailed in Municipal Code Section 18-314(e) and occur only Monday through Saturday between 7:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. As such, project construction noise would be exempt from the City's noise standards and compliance with hours of construction activities would reduce impacts to less than significant in this regard. Long-term Operational Impacts Mobile Noise Implementation of the project would result in vehicle use on adjacent roadways, thereby increasing vehicular noise in the site vicinity. As determined by the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) in the Technical Noise Supplement to the Traffic Noise Analysis Protocol (September 2013), a doubling in roadway traffic volumes is required to generate any noticeable increase in roadway noise levels.22 According to the Vista Heritage Global Academy Expansion Trip Generation Assessment prepared by Urban Crossroads and dated July 24, 2023, the proposed project would generate 84 average daily trips without taking trip reductions from the existing uses as they are currently vacant. The nearest major roadway segment to the project vicinity is Fairview Street which currently experiences approximately 40,000 average daily trips.23 As such, the project's minimal trip generation (approximately 84 average daily trips) would not double existing traffic volumes along nearby roadways and an increase in traffic noise along local roadways would be imperceptible. Project -related traffic noise impacts would be less than significant. Stationary Noise Impacts Stationary noise sources associated with the proposed project would include mechanical equipment, parking activities, and outdoor play field areas. These noise sources are typically intermittent and short in duration. Noise has a decay rate due to distance attenuation, which is calculated based on the Inverse Square Law. Based upon the Inverse Square Law, sound levels decrease by 6 dBA for each doubling of distance from the source.24 All stationary noise activities would be required to comply with RR NOI-3 in accordance with the City's noise standards. Mechanical Equipment Heating Ventilation and Air Conditioning (HVAC) units typically generate noise levels of approximately 66 dBA Leq at three feet from the source.25 HVAC units are expected to be located 22 California Department of Transportation, Technical Noise Supplement to the Traffic Noise Analysis Protocol, September 2013. 21 City of Santa Ana, City of Santa Ana General Plan Circulation Element, https://storage.googleapis.com/proudcity/santaanaca/uploads/2022/04/Circulation-Element.pdf, accessed on July 28, 2023. 21 Cyril M. Harris, Noise Control in Buildings, 1994. 25 Berger, Elliott H., et al., Noise Navigator Sound Level Database with Over 1700 Measurement Values, June 26, 2015. Dec I y ouncil 26 — 395 1/16/20'2 e 46 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 on the center of the rooftop and the closest sensitive receptor to the HVAC units is the existing Vista Charter Global Academy located at approximately 130 feet to the south. At the distance of 130 feet, HVAC noise levels would attenuate to approximately 33 dBA. Therefore, HVAC noise levels would be below the City's exterior daytime standards of 55 dBA and nighttime standards of 45 dBA in accordance with RR NOI-3 and would be lower than existing ambient noise levels of 66.2 dBA near the nearest sensitive receptor (Vista Charter Global Academy); refer to Table 7. Furthermore, HVAC equipment are already present on the rooftop of the existing building and the project would not introduce additional HVAC equipment. Therefore, the nearest sensitive receptors would not be directly exposed to substantial noise from on -site HVAC equipment and impacts would be less than significant. Parking Areas Traffic associated with parking activities is typically not of sufficient volume to exceed community noise standards, which are based on a time -averaged scale such as the CNEL scale. However, the instantaneous maximum sound levels generated by a car door slamming, engine starting up and car pass -by may be an annoyance to adjacent noise -sensitive receptors. Estimates of the maximum noise levels associated with some parking lot activities are presented in Table 9, Typical Noise Levels Generated by Parking Lots. Table 9 Typical Noise Levels Generated by Parking Lots Noise Source Maximum Noise Levels at 50 Feet from Source Car door slamming 61 dBA Uq Car starting 60 dBA Uq Car idling 53 dBA Uq Source: Kariel, H. G., Noise in Rural Recreational Environments, Canadian Acoustics 19(5), 3-10, 1991. The project would provide 63 parking spaces on -site. As shown in Table 9, parking activities can result in noise levels up to 61 dBA at a distance of 50 feet. The proposed project would have intermittent parking activities noise due to the movement of vehicles. The nearest sensitive receptors are the existing single-family residences located approximately 100 feet from the proposed parking spaces on the north of the project site. At this distance, noise levels from parking activities would range from 47 dBA to 55 dBA. As previously noted, parking lot noise are instantaneous noise levels compared to noise standards in the CNEL scale, which are averaged over time. As a result, actual noise levels over time resulting from parking lot activities would be far lower than what is identified above. Further, parking activity noise currently exists within the project site and would not represent a new source of noise. Impacts would be less than significant in this regard. Outdoor Play Area The proposed project proposes outdoor play areas along the northern boundary of the existing Vista Charter Global Academy building, in the southern portion of the project site. The play area has the potential to be accessed by groups of children intermittently for gathering, etc. Noise generated by groups of people (i.e., crowds) is dependent on several factors including vocal effort, impulsiveness, and the random orientation of the crowd members. Crowd noise is estimated at 60 dBA at one meter (3.28 feet) away for raised normal speaking.26 This noise level would have a +5 dBA adjustment for the impulsiveness of the noise source, and a -3 dBA adjustment for the 21 M.J. Hayne, et al, Prediction of Crowd Noise, Acoustics, November 2006. Dec i y ouncil 26 — 396 1/16/202 e 47 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 random orientation of the crowd members.27 Therefore, crowd noise would be approximately 62 dBA at one meter from the source (i.e., the outdoor gathering areas). The nearest sensitive receptors would be the residential uses to the north of the project site, located approximately 200 feet from the proposed outdoor play areas. Therefore, crowd noise at the nearest sensitive receptor would be 26 dBA, which would not exceed the City's noise standards for residential uses in accordance with RR NOI-3 (i.e., 55 dBA for daytime and 45 dBA for nighttime) and would be lower than existing ambient noise levels of 51.1 dBA near the nearest sensitive receptors (residential uses to the north); refer to Table 7. As a result, noise generated from the outdoor play area would be further reduced. As such, project noise associated with outdoor play area would have a less than significant impact would occur in this regard. PROJECT -GENERATED VIBRATION IMPACTS Project construction activities can generate varying degrees of groundborne vibration, depending on the construction procedure and the construction equipment used. Operation of construction equipment generates vibrations that spread through the ground and diminish in amplitude with distance from the source. The effect on buildings located in the vicinity of the construction site often varies depending on soil type, ground strata, and construction characteristics of the receiver building(s). The results from vibration can range from no perceptible effects at the lowest vibration levels, to low rumbling sounds and perceptible vibration at moderate levels, to slight damage at the highest levels. Groundborne vibrations from construction activities rarely reach levels that damage structures. This evaluation uses the FTA architectural damage criterion for continuous vibrations of 0.3 in/sec PPV for engineered concrete and masonry. Typical vibration produced by construction equipment is illustrated in Table 10, Typical Vibration Levels for Construction Equipment. Table 10 Typical Vibration Levels for Construction Equipment Approximate peak particle velocity at Approximate peak particle velocity at Equipment 25 feet(inch/sec) 100 feet inch/sec) Large bulldozer 0.089 0.0111 Loaded trucks 0.076 0.0095 Small bulldozer 0.003 0.0004 Notes: 1. Calculated using the following formula: PPV equip = PPV ref x (25/D)f f where: PPV equip = the peak particle velocity in in/sec of the equipment adjusted for the distance PPV of = the reference vibration level in in/sec from Table 7-4 of the FTA Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Guidelines D = the distance from the equipment to the receiver Source: California Department of Transportation, Transportation and Construction Vibration Manual, April 2020. The nearest sensitive receptor structure is the existing single-family buildings located approximately 100 feet to the north of anticipated project site. As indicated in Table 10, vibration velocities from typical heavy construction equipment used during project construction would range from 0.0004 to 0.0111 in/sec PPV at 100 feet from the source of activity, which would not exceed the 0.3 in/sec PPV threshold. As such, the impacts would be less than significant. The proposed project use would not generate operational groundborne vibration that could be felt by surrounding uses. Additionally, the proposed project would not involve railroads or substantial 27 Ibid. Dec I y ouncil 26 — 397 1/16/20'2 e 48 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 heavy truck operations, and therefore would not result in operational vibration impacts at surrounding uses. No impacts would occur in this regard. EXCESSIVE NOISE NEAR AIRPORTS The nearest airport to the project site is the John Wayne Airport located approximately five miles to the southeast. The project site is not located within two miles of the airport. Additionally, the project site is not located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or related facilities. Therefore, project implementation would not expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels associated with aircraft. As such, the impacts would be less than significant. NOISE IMPACTS TO ON -SITE SENSITIVE RECEPTORS The project site is located adjacent to an existing railroad alignment. The railroad is currently not operational and is being developed to build a fixed guideway system, OC Streetcar. Due to the proximity of the project site to the railroad alignment, future operations of the railroad have the potential to elevate existing noise levels, particularly during streetcar operations and crossing signal noise along Fairview Street located at approximately 90 feet from the project site. Based on the Santa Ana and Garden Grove Fixed Guideway Project Noise and Vibration Technical Report, prepared by URS Corporation and dated February 2012, noise from the operation of future streetcars have the potential to range from approximately 43 dBA Ldn during crossing activities to 59 dBA Ldn during blowing warning horn at approximately 100 feet. As such, exterior noise levels impacting the project site from the operation of future streetcars would not increase the existing ambient noise levels; refer to Table 7. Furthermore, future noise level impacts from OC Streetcar operations would be within the normally acceptable range of 50 to 70 dBA CNEL.28 As such, noise impacts to on -site sensitive receptors would be less than significant. 4.13.3 Conclusion As such, the project is consistent with buildout of the General Plan Update. Upon implementation of RR N0I-2 and N0I-3, the proposed project would not have any specific effects which are peculiar to the project or the site. There are no project specific impacts or potentially significant off -site or cumulative impacts the GPU EIR failed to analyze, and there are no new significant or substantially more severe impacts to noise and vibration than anticipated by the GPU EIR. Applicable GPU EIR Regulatory Requirements/Mitigation Measures: RR N0I-2 Construction Noise Sources: Section 18-314(e) of the Santa Ana Municipal code prohibits construction activities to the hours of 7:00 AM to 8:00 PM Monday through Saturday. RR N0I-3 Stationary Noise Sources: Section 18.312 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code establishes standards for stationary noise sources. 28 State of California Governor's Office of Planning and Research, General Plan Guidelines, Julv 2017. Dec i y ouncil 26 — 398 1/16/20'2 e 49 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 4.14 Population and Housing 4.14.1 GPU EIR Findings The GPU EIR concluded that full buildout of the General Plan Update would result in a population of 431,629 and the City's 2045 population growth would be approximately 20 percent greater than the Orange County Council of Government (COG) 2045 population projections for the City. Furthermore, it is anticipated that General Plan Update buildout would result in 115,053 dwelling units, which exceeds the Orange County COG's housing projections for the City by 38 percent. As such, impacts are considered potentially significant. However, there are no feasible mitigation measures to mitigate the population and housing growth anticipated for the buildout of the General Plan Update. Further, the purpose of the General Plan Update is to provide orderly growth in the City through the distribution, location, balance, and extent of land uses, and the General Plan Update would provide more housing opportunities than currently exist during a time when there is a housing crisis. Still, impacts to population and housing were determined to be significant and unavoidable. 4.14.2 Project Analysis The project proposes to remodel and reoccupy a building formerly occupied by an automotive repair use as an office building for Vista Charter Public Schools. Vista Charter Public Schools operates six public charter schools in Los Angeles and Orange County and serves a total of 1,500 students. The proposed project creates an opportunity to have a district office located next to the organization's largest school, Vista Heritage Global Academy. While the headquarters would provide new office and conference space for employees of Vista Charter Public Schools, it is not anticipated that the project would generate new employment opportunities within the existing organization. Additionally, proposed outdoor areas would serve existing students of the adjoining Vista Heritage Global Academy and would not increase existing school capacity. As a result, the proposed project would not directly or indirectly result in substantial unplanned population growth in the area or displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing. Further, as discussed in Section 4.11, Land Use and Planning, the project would meet the design standards of the FLEX-1.5 designation and would be consistent with the applicable General Plan Update Land Use Element goals and policies. Therefore, consistent with the General Plan Update, less than significant impacts to population and housing would occur. 4.14.3 Conclusion As such, the project is consistent with of the General Plan Update. The proposed project would not have any specific effects which are peculiar to the project or the site. There are no project specific impacts or potentially significant off -site or cumulative impacts the GPU EIR failed to analyze, and there are no new significant or substantially more severe impacts to population and housing than anticipated by the GPU EIR. Applicable GPU EIR Regulatory Requirements/Mitigation Measures: No GPU EIR regulatory requirements or mitigation measures apply. 4.15 Public Services 4.15.1 GPU EIR Findings The GPU EIR concluded that introduction of new structures and additional residents and workers to the City would increase the demand for fire and police protection services. However, funding Dec i y ouncil 26 — 399 1/16/202 e so Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 for additional staff, equipment, and facilities would come from property taxes, grants, special revenue funds, and the City's general fund as future development accommodated by the General Plan Update occurs. The additional demand for fire and police protection services due to population growth generated within the City would be satisfied through these sources. Additionally, the GPU EIR determined that school districts within the City would have the capacity to accommodate future students generated as a result of the proposed General Plan Update. Should there be a need to expand or construct new facilities, funding for new schools would be obtained from the mitigation fee program pursuant to Senate Bill (SB) 50, and State and federal funding programs. Pursuant to Section 65996 of the Government Code, payment of school fees is deemed to provide full and complete school facilities mitigation. Further, while library services would also experience an increase in demand, property taxes and library fines and fees are expected to satisfy this impact; overall, impacts would be less than significant. 4.15.2 Project Analysis As discussed above, buildout of General Plan Update is projected to increase the population of the City beyond growth projections. However, the project would not contribute to population growth as the proposed district office would serve existing employees and the outdoor recreation areas would serve existing students. As such, the proposed project would not increase demands on existing public services. Additionally, compliance with RR FP-1 would ensure that the proposed project would meet the fire regulations outlined in California Health and Safety Code, and RR SS- 1 would ensure that the proposed project would pay school development fees authorized by Section 65996 of the California Government Code. The project would also generate property tax which further fund fire and police protection services and library services. Therefore, consistent with the General Plan Update, less than significant impacts would occur. 4.15.3 Conclusion As such, the project is consistent with the General Plan Update. With implementation of RR FP- 1 and SS-1 identified in the GPU EIR, the proposed project would not have any specific effects which are peculiar to the project or the site. There are no project specific impacts or potentially significant off -site or cumulative impacts the GPU EIR failed to analyze, and there are no new significant or substantially more severe impacts to public services than anticipated by the GPU EIR. Applicable GPU EIR Regulatory Requirements/Mitigation Measures: RR FP-1 New buildings are required to meet the fire regulations outlined in California Health and Safety Code (Sections 13000 et seq.). RR SS-1 New residential and commercial development shall pay development fees authorized by Section 65996 of the California Government Code to be "full and complete school facilities mitigation." 4.16 Recreation 4.16.1 GPU EIR Findings The GPU EIR concluded that buildout of the General Plan Update would generate the demand for approximately 564 acres of parkland and recreational facilities assumed to serve the 2045 population. The City is essentially built -out and very limited vacant land is available to be developed with new recreational opportunities. New or expanded facilities would need to occur Dec i y ouncil 26 — 400 1/16/202 e 51 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 outside of park -designated parcels and the development of these facilities may have an adverse physical effect on the environment, including impacts relating to air quality, biological resources, lighting, noise, and traffic. As such, it was determined that even with implementation of Mitigation Measure REC-1, which would require preparation of a public park utilization study, followed by further mitigation such as land dedication or fair shares contributions for projects resulting in a significant impact based on the study. impacts to recreation were determined to be significant and unavoidable. 4.16.2 Project Analysis As discussed, the project is not anticipated to generate population growth. As such, it is not anticipated that the project would increase demand on the City's existing parks or recreation facilities. Rather, the project proposes to redevelop the existing shared surface parking lot in the southern portion of the site into an outdoor area consisting of an approximately 2,297-square foot community garden, an approximately 7,372-square foot play field, and an approximately 4,640- square foot play yard. Outdoor areas would serve existing students of the adjoining Vista Heritage Global Academy and would not increase existing school capacity. As such, while the project does not provide additional public parkland, it would alleviate demand on existing City recreation facilities that may otherwise be utilized by the students. Environmental impacts associated with the construction of these outdoor areas are addressed in the respective topical sections of this document (i.e., aesthetics, air quality, biological resources, cultural resources, greenhouse gas emissions, noise, and transportation). Further, the proposed project would be required to either dedicate land or pay in -lieu impact fees per Municipal Code Chapter 34, Article VIII, and Chapter 35, Article IV as well as the Quimby Act. The fees collected would be used for development and improvement of public parks and recreation facilities throughout the City. Thus, the proposed project would not cause or accelerate substantial physical deterioration of existing parks or other recreational facilities nor include or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities that might have an adverse physical effect on the environment. Impacts would be less than significant. 4.16.3 Conclusion As such, the project is consistent with the General Plan Update. The proposed project would not have any specific effects which are peculiar to the project or the site. There are no project specific impacts or potentially significant off -site or cumulative impacts the GPU EIR failed to analyze, and there are no new significant or substantially more severe impacts to recreation than anticipated by the GPU EIR. Applicable GPU EIR Regulatory Requirements/Mitigation Measures: No GPU EIR regulatory requirements or mitigation measures apply. 4.17 Transportation 4.17.1 GPU EIR Findings The GPU EIR determined that buildout of the General Plan Update would not conflict with a program, plan, ordinance, or policy addressing the circulation system following implementation of RR T-1. RR T-1 requires design and operation of a multimodal circulation system network with all users in mind including bicyclists, public transportation vehicles and riders, and pedestrians of all ages and abilities. The General Plan Update incorporates future networks and policies related to supporting transit, bicycles, and pedestrians in the City, which are consistent with regional and local planning efforts supporting these modes of travel. Additionally, implementation of the Dec i y ouncil 26 — 401 1/16/202 e 52 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 General Plan Update would result in a reduction of vehicle miles traveled (VMT) per service population in comparison to existing conditions at the time the GPU EIR was prepared and would achieve a VMT per service population of at least 15 percent lower than the Countywide VMT per service population. The GPU EIR also determined that buildout of the General Plan Update would not substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature or result in inadequate emergency access following implementation of RR T-2. RR T-2 requires projects pursuant to the General Plan Update to implement fire protection requirements as detailed in the Orange County Fire Authority's Fire Prevention Guidelines and the California Fire Code. 4.17.2 Project Analysis No changes are proposed to the existing circulation system in the project area and thus, the proposed project would not conflict with any program plan, ordinance or policy addressing the circulation system. According to the City of Santa Ana Traffic Impact Study Guidelines (City Traffic Guidelines), a project can be presumed to have a less -than -significant VMT impact if the project satisfies one of the following screening criteria: 29 • Projects which serve the local community and have the potential to reduce VMT, such as neighborhood K-12 schools and local -serving retail less than 50,000 sq. ft. (Charter schools are excluded from this criteria). • Projects that generate less than 110 net daily trips. • Projects located within Transit Priority Areas (TPAs); refer to City Traffic Guidelines Appendix A, Santa Ana Transit Priority Areas. • Projects located in a low-VMT generating Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ). City Traffic Guidelines Appendix B, VMT/SP in Santa Ana as Compared to Orange County Average, shows VMT per service population in Santa Ana as compared to the County average. Low-VMT TAZs per Santa Ana's threshold of significance are any TAZs generating VMT 15 percent below the County average. The proposed project would renovate the approximately 5,837-square foot former automotive repair building as the Vista Charter Public Schools district office. According to the Vista Heritage Global Academy Expansion Trip Generation Assessment (Trip Generation Memo), prepared by Urban Crossroads, Inc. and dated July 24, 2023, the proposed project would generate approximately 84 average daily trips with 14 morning peak hour trips and 12 afternoon peak hour trips; refer to Attachment C, Trip Generation Memo. Therefore, the proposed project would meet the screening criteria related to projects that generate less than 110 net daily trips. Additionally, according to City Traffic Guidelines Appendix A, Santa Ana Transit Priority Areas, the project site is located within a TPA, which is defined as a 0.5-mile radius around an existing or planned major transit stop (e.g., Metrolink Station, Streetcar Station, etc.) or an existing stop along a high -quality transit corridor. Thus, the project also meets the screening criteria related to projects located within TPAs. 29 City of Santa Ana, City of Santa Ana Traffic Impact Study Guidelines, September 2019. Dec i y ouncil 26 — 402 1 /16/20'2 e 53 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 Overall, the project meets two of the VMT screening requirements and thus, no VMT analysis would be required. The project is presumed to have a less than significant VMT impact. Additionally, the project does not propose any changes to the City's existing circulation system and would not introduce incompatible uses to area roadways. The site is accessible from North Fairview Street via two driveways to the west, and two alleys connecting to West 5th Street to the south and southeast. Site access would not change as part of the proposed project. Additionally, the proposed project is not anticipated to require road closures during project construction as all proposed improvements would occur within the project boundary. 4.17.3 Conclusion Overall, the project is consistent with the General Plan Update. The proposed project would not have any specific effects which are peculiar to the project or the site. There are no project -specific impacts or potentially significant off -site or cumulative impacts the GPU EIR failed to analyze, and there are no new significant or substantially more severe transportation impacts than anticipated by the GPU EIR. Applicable GPU EIR Regulatory Requirements/Mitigation Measures: No GPU EIR regulatory requirements or mitigation measures apply. 4.18 Tribal Cultural Resources 4.18.1 GPU EIR Findings The City consulted with applicable Native American tribes in accordance with Senate Bill (SB) 18 and Assembly Bill (AB) 52. Given that tribal cultural resources are site -specific in nature. Future development allowed under the General Plan Update could potentially impact and cause significant adverse impacts to tribal cultural resources. Thus, Mitigation Measures CUL-4 through CUL-7 would reduce such impacts to less than significant levels. Specifically, to reduce impacts to archaeological resources and prior to ground -disturbing activities, Mitigation Measure CUL-4 requires an Archaeological Resources Assessment be conducted under the supervision of an archaeologist that meets the Secretary of the Interior's Professionally Qualified Standards in either prehistoric or historic archaeology. If potentially significant archaeological resources are identified and impacts cannot be avoided, Mitigation Measure CUL-5 requires a Phase II Testing and Evaluation investigation be performed by an archaeologist meeting the Secretary of the Interior's Standards to determine the significance of the resource(s). Per Mitigation Measure CUL- 6, if the Archaeological Resources Assessment does not identify archaeological resources but indicates the project area to be highly sensitive for archeological resources, a qualified archaeologist and a Native American monitor culturally affiliated with the project area must monitor all ground -disturbing activities in the areas of high archaeological sensitivity. In the event that archaeological resources (artifacts or features) are exposed during ground -disturbing activities, construction activities in the immediate vicinity of the discovery must halt while the resources are evaluated for significance by a qualified archaeologist. Pursuant to Mitigation Measure CUL-7, if the Archaeological Resources Assessment does not identify potentially significant archaeological resources but the site has moderate sensitivity for archaeological resources, an archaeologist meeting the Secretary's Standards must be retained on -call. The archaeologist must inform all construction personnel prior to construction activities about the proper procedures in the event of an archaeological discovery. Overall, the GPU EIR determined that implementation of Mitigation Measures CUL-4 through CUL-7 would reduce tribal cultural resources impacts to less than significant levels. Dec i y ouncil 26 — 403 1 /16/20'2 e 54 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 4.18.2 Project Analysis Although the project would redevelop the shared surface parking lot in the southern portion of the site into an outdoor community garden, play field, and play yard, the proposed project would not require extensive excavation that could uncover previously undiscovered tribal cultural resources. Typical excavation depth would be a maximum of four feet for the majority of the site with the deepest excavation of approximately eight feet for an underground infiltration chamber related to stormwater improvements. No new or substantially more severe impacts would occur compared to the determinations of the GPU EIR, and no new mitigation measures are required. 4.18.3 Conclusion Overall, the project is consistent with the General Plan Update. The proposed project would not have any specific effects which are peculiar to the project or the site. There are no project -specific impacts or potentially significant off -site or cumulative impacts the GPU EIR failed to analyze, and there are no new significant or substantially more severe tribal cultural resource impacts than anticipated by the GPU EIR. Applicable GPU EIR Regulatory Requirements/Mitigation Measures: No GPU EIR regulatory requirements or mitigation measures apply. 4.19 Utilities and Service Systems 4.19.1 GPU EIR Findings The GPU EIR concluded that increased sewer flow from buildout of the General Plan Update would require pipe upsizing to meet the demands of new residential and commercial uses; however, the Orange County Sanitation District Master Plan accounts for trunk line improvements and the Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD), in general, has a functioning and effective process in place to ensure the regional sewer infrastructure is able to support future developments in the City. Further, OCSD confirmed that wastewater generated by buildout of the General Plan Update would be adequately treated by Treatment Plant No. 1. The GPU EIR also concluded sufficient Orange County Water District water supplies and Orange County Public Works stormwater drainage facilities would be available to serve the full General Plan Update buildout from existing entitlements and resources, and new or expanded entitlements would not be required beyond those improvements already planned for the City. 4.19.2 Project Analysis Based on wastewater generation rates for commercial uses in the West Santa Ana Focus Area, contained within Volume III, Appendix H-a, of the GPU EIR, the proposed project would generate approximately 2,036 gallons of wastewater per day.30 The proposed project would connect to existing wastewater infrastructure, which would have the capacity to serve the project demand in addition to existing service commitments and would not require the expansion of existing facilities. Compliance with RR U-2 would ensure that OCSD connection fees are paid in accordance with Ordinance No. OCSD-40. Additionally, as discussed above, runoff from the proposed project is currently collected by stormwater drainage facilities in the surrounding roadway. The proposed project would implement BMPs contained in the WQMP to capture and infiltrate stormwater runoff. 30 Based on a rate of 2,262 gallons of wastewater per day per acre for a 0.9-acre site. The GPU EIR separated land uses into either residential or commercial in order to determine average wastewater generation. While it is acknowledged that the proposed project would involve office use, commercial rates were deemed most appropriate in order to compare the proposed project to the analysis contained within the GPU EIR. Dec I y ouncil 26 — 404 1 /16/202 e 55 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 Any runoff leaving the project site would continue to drain to the existing drain inlets in the project area, and the proposed project would not require or result in the construction of new or expanded storm water drainage facilities. Based on water demand rates for commercial uses, contained within Volume III, Appendix H-b, of the GPU EIR, the proposed project would require approximately 2,250 gallons of water per day, which would be met by the City's supplies.31 However, compliance with RR U-5 would ensure that the project is designed pursuant to the water conservation and efficiency requirements of the Municipal Code, and RR U-6 would ensure water connection fees are paid. Therefore, consistent with the General Plan Update, impacts related to water supplies, wastewater treatment, and storm water drainage from the proposed project would be less than significant. The proposed project would generate a nominal amount of solid waste during construction activities. However, the proposed project would comply with the CALGreen Building Code Standards, which requires that at least 65 percent of nonhazardous construction and demolition waste generated during most new construction be recycled and/or salvaged for reuse. During operations, the proposed project would generate approximately 34.8 pounds of solid waste per day, typical of office uses.32,33 According to the GPU EIR, solid waste generated in the City is transferred to Orange County solid waste landfill system which has ample capacity to accommodate increased volumes of waste from the City through 2053. Furthermore, the proposed project would be required to comply with the requirements of AB 341, which mandates recycling for commercial land uses, and AB 1826, which requires that any organic waste generated in amounts over a certain threshold would be recycled. Therefore, the proposed project would not generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards or of the future capacity of local infrastructure, and would comply with all applicable federal, State, and local solid waste regulations. Consistent with the General Plan Update, impacts would be less than significant. The site is currently served by SCE and Southern California Gas Company (SoCalGas). Project impacts with regards to electricity and natural gas services would be nominal given that operations of the proposed office would utilize minimal electricity and natural gas. As summarized under Section 4.6, Energy, the project would not result in substantial energy consumption, upon compliance with existing regulatory requirements, including the 2022 Title 24 Building Energy Efficiency Standards and 2012 Appliance Efficiency Regulations pursuant to RR E-3 and E-4. Additionally, the project would be required to pay connection and ongoing user fees to SCE and SoCalGas to offset project impacts on existing dry utility services and resources. Thus, impacts with regards to dry utilities would be less than significant. 4.19.3 Conclusion As such, the project is consistent with the General Plan Update. With implementation of RR U-2, U-5, U-6, HYD-4, and HYD-5 identified in the GPU EIR, the proposed project would not have any specific effects which are peculiar to the project or the site. There are no project specific impacts or potentially significant off -site or cumulative impacts the GPU EIR failed to analyze, and there are no new significant or substantially more severe impacts to utilities and service systems than anticipated by the GPU EIR. 31 Based on a rate of 2,500 gallons of water per day per acre for a 0.9-acre site. The GPU EIR separated land uses into either residential or commercial in order to determine average water demand. While it is acknowledged that the proposed project would involve office use, commercial rates were deemed most appropriate in order to compare the proposed project to the analysis contained within the GPU EIR. 32 Based on a rate of 0.006 pounds of solid waste per day per square foot for a 5,800square foot office building. 33 CalRecycle, Estimated Solid Waste Generation Rates, https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/wastecharacterization/general/rates, accessed August 10, 2023. Dec I y ouncil 26 — 405 1 /16/202 e 56 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 Applicable GPU EIR Regulatory Requirements/Mitigation Measures: Refer to Section 4.6, Energy, for RR E-3 and EA and Section 4.10, Hydrology and Water Quality, for RR HYD-4 and HYD-5. RR U-2 Any new connections to the Orange County Sanitation District system or expansion of a previous connection shall pay a capital facilities charge in accordance with Ordinance No. OCSD-40. RR U-5 Any development implemented under the General Plan Update shall abide by the water conservation and efficiency requirements detailed in Chapter 8, Article XVI, Chapter 39, Article VI and Chapter 41, Article XVI of the Santa Ana Municipal Code. RR U-6 Water connection fees shall be paid in accordance with Chapter 39, Article II of the City's Municipal Code and plumbing shall be installed in compliance with Chapter 8, Article III. 4.20 Wildfire 4.20.1 GPU EIR Findings The GPU EIR concludes that buildout of the General Plan Update would not substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan, exacerbate wildfire risks thereby creating elevated particulate concentration exposure to people, nor would it expose people or structures to significant risks. The General Plan Update would require the installation and maintenance of associated infrastructure in areas that are undeveloped or vacant which could exacerbate fire risk. 4.20.2 Project Analysis The CEQA Guidelines require analysis of wildfire risk in State responsibility areas (SRAs) and/or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones. As stated in the GPU EIR, the nearest fire hazard severity zone (FHSZ) in an SRA to the City of Santa Ana is a high FHSZ about four miles east along the western edge of Loma Ridge. The nearest FHSZ in a local responsibility area (LRA) is about 3.8 miles at the southern tip of the Peters Canyon Regional Park. Therefore, the project site is not in or near SRAs or lands classified as very high FHSZs. Additionally, no area in the City is a wildland-urban interface. As such, no impact related to wildfire risk would occur due to development of the proposed project. 4.20.3 Conclusion As such, the project is consistent with the General Plan Update. The proposed project would not have any specific effects which are peculiar to the project or the site. There are no project specific impacts or potentially significant off -site or cumulative impacts the GPU EIR failed to analyze, and there are no new significant or substantially more severe impacts to wildfire than anticipated by the GPU EIR. Applicable GPU EIR Regulatory Requirements/Mitigation Measures: No GPU EIR regulatory requirements or mitigation measures apply. Dec i y ouncil 26 — 406 1 /16/20'2 e 57 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 5. Findings As discussed in Section 3.0, the City of Santa Ana intends to pursue a CEQA exemption for the proposed project pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15183. As stated in CEQA Guidelines Section 15183(d), the exemption requires a project to meet the following conditions: 1. The project is consistent with: a. A community plan adopted as part of a general plan, b. A zoning action which zoned or designated the parcel on which the project would be located to accommodate a particular density of development, or c. A general plan of a local agency, and 2. An EIR was certified by the lead agency for the zoning action, the community plan, or the general plan. The General Plan Update and GPU EIR were adopted and certified by the Santa Ana City Council in 2022. The project site is located within the General Plan Update West Santa Ana Boulevard Focus Area. This portion of the City was historically a more industrial area; the General Plan Update intends to transition the area from a group of auto -oriented neighborhoods, businesses, and institutions into a series of transit -oriented neighborhoods that support and benefit from future streetcar stops. Additionally, the industrial portion of the focus area (where the project site is located) is envisioned and designated Industrial/Flex (FLEX) to promote new opportunities, including new clean industrial/manufacturing, maker -type spaces, and other uses that are more compatible with the surrounding residential areas than traditional industrial uses. The project site has a land use designation of Industrial/Flex-Low (FLEX-1.5), which is intended for office/industrial flex spaces, small-scale research and development, clean manufacturing, and live -work uses. The proposed project would redevelop a former automotive repair building into a school district office, which is a permitted use under the FLEX-1.5 designation and considered in the analysis of the GPU EIR. Additionally, the General Plan Update encourages adaptive reuse of existing industrial buildings within this focus area, which would be achieved with implementation of the project. As such, the GPU EIR adequately anticipated and analyzed the impacts of this project, identified applicable mitigation measures necessary to reduce impacts of the project, and the project implements the applicable mitigation measures. The project, therefore, qualifies for an exemption from additional environmental review as set forth in CEQA Guidelines Section 15183. Overall, the project qualifies for the exemption because the following findings can be made: a) The project is consistent with the development density established by existing zoning, community plan or general plan policies for which an EIR was certified. Based on General Plan Update Land Use Element Figure LU-1, Land Use Map, the project site is designated Industrial/Flex-Low (FLEX-1.5). The FLEX-1.5 designation allows a maximum 1.5 FAR and/or 30 dwelling per acre, with a maximum building height of three stories. The proposed project would renovate the approximately 5,837-square foot former automotive repair building as the Vista Charter Public Schools district office. The project site is approximately 0.9-acre. Thus, the project would result in a 0.15 FAR. Additionally, the building would maintain its existing building height of approximately 19.3 feet. Thus, the proposed project would be consistent with the site's FLEX-1.5 designation development density established by the General Dec i y ouncil 26 - 407 1 /16/202 e 5s Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 Plan Update. Additionally, the project would be consistent with applicable General Plan Update Land Use Element policies as detailed in Table 5. Overall, the project would be consistent with Criterion A. b) There are no project specific effects which are peculiar to the project or its site. The project site is located within the Fairview Business Park in an industrial area of Santa Ana. The Fairview Business Park is currently developed with institutional (Vista Heritage Global Academy and Templo Calvario Church), industrial, and office uses. As stated, the site's FLEX- 1.5 land use designation is intended to provide context -appropriate development in areas with existing industrial uses. The proposed Vista Charter Public Schools district office and outdoor open space areas would complement and serve the existing Vista Heritage Global Academy located adjacent to the site's southern boundary. Additionally, upon approval of the required Zone Change and Zoning Ordinance Amendment, project development would be required to comply with applicable standards for the SD-82 zone, which is consistent with the standards for Light Industrial uses in Municipal Code Sections 41-473 through 41-481. As such, the proposed project would not result in effects which are peculiar to the project or its site and the project would be consistent with Criterion B. c) There are no project specific impacts which the prior EIR failed to analyze as significant effects. The GPU EIR concluded that buildout of the General Plan Update would result in a total of 115,053 residential units and 72,967,816 square feet of non-residential development by 2045. The proposed project, which is consistent with the General Plan Update, involves renovating an existing 5,837-square foot building and developing outdoor open space areas on an approximately 0.9-acre site. The project would meet the development density requirement for the FLEX-1.5 designation and thus, was considered in the planned development of the General Plan Update and would have similar or lesser significant impacts than analyzed in the GPU EIR. As discussed in Section 4.0, there are no project specific impacts which the GPU EIR failed to analyze as significant effects. The proposed project is consistent with Criterion C. d) There are no potentially significant off -site and/or cumulative impacts which the prior EIR failed to evaluate. As stated, buildout of the proposed project is consistent with the General Plan Update and thus, was considered in the GPU EIR analysis. No off -site improvements are proposed in the project area and the size and nature of the project would not result in cumulatively considerable environmental impacts. Overall, there are no potentially significant off -site and/or cumulative impacts which the GPU EIR failed to evaluate. The project is consistent with Criterion D. e) There is no substantial new information which results in more severe impacts than anticipated by the prior EIR. As discussed in Section 4.0, the proposed project would result in similar and/or lesser impacts than the GPU EIR. There is no substantial new information which result in more severe impacts than anticipated by the GPU EIR. Therefore, the proposed project is consistent with Criterion E. As shown, the proposed project is consistent with Criteria A through E under CEQA Guidelines Section 15183. As such, the proposed project qualifies for the CEQA exemption. Dec i y ouncil 26 — 408 1 /16/20'2 e 59 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 REFERENCES Berger, Elliott H., et al., Noise Navigator Sound Level Database with Over 1700 Measurement Values, June 26, 2015. California Air Resources Board, 2022 Scoping Plan, November 16, 2022. California Air Resources Board, Air Quality and Land Use Handbook: A Community Health Perspective, April 2005. California Air Resources Board, Air Quality and Meteorological Information, https://www.arb.ca.gov/agmis2/agdselect.php?tab=specialrpt, accessed July 3, 2023. California Department of Conservation, California Important Farmland Finder, https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/DLRP/CIFF/, accessed June 29, 2023. California Department of Conservation, California Williamson Act Enrollment Finder, https://gis.conservation.ca.gov/portal/home/webmap/viewer.html?webmap=l 8f7488cOa9 d4d299f5e9c33b312f312, accessed July 26, 2023. California Department of Conservation Division of Mines and Geology, A General Location Guide for Ultramafic Rocks in California — Areas More Likely to Contain Naturally Occurring Asbestos Report, August 2000, https:Hww3.arb.ca.gov/toxics/asbestos/ofr_2000-019.pdf, accessed April 3, 2023. California Department of Transportation, Technical Noise Supplement to the Traffic Noise Analysis Protocol, September 2013. California Department of Transportation, Transportation and Construction Vibration Manual, April 2020. California Environmental Protection Agency, Cortese Listing, https://calepa.ca.gov/sitecleanup/corteselist/, accessed July 6, 2023. CalRecycle, Estimated Solid Waste Generation Rates, https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/wastecharacterization/general/rates, accessed August 10, 2023. CalRecycle, Green Building Materials, https://www.calrecycle.ca.gov/greenbuiIding/materials#Material, accessed August 15, 2023. California Natural Resources Agency, Final Statement of Reasons for Regulatory Action, pp. 11- 13, 14, 16, December 2009, https://resources.ca.gov/CNRALegacyFiles/ceqa/docs/Final_Statement_of_Reasons.pdf , accessed July 13, 2023. City of Santa Ana, City of Santa Ana Climate Action Plan, December 2015. City of Santa Ana, City of Santa Ana Traffic Impact Study Guidelines, September 2019. City of Santa Ana, City of Santa Ana Zoning Map, March 4, 2021. Dec i y ouncil 26 — 409 1 /16/20'2 e 60 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 City of Santa Ana, Golden City Beyond, Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Element, Figure LU- 1, Land Use Map, April 2022. City of Santa Ana, City of Santa Ana General Plan Circulation Element, https://storage.googleapis.com/proudcity/santaanaca/uploads/2022/04/Circulation- Element.pdf, accessed on July 28, 2023. City of Santa Ana, Santa Ana Municipal Code, codified through Ordinance No. NS-3049, adopted July 18, 2023. Cyril M. Harris, Noise Control in Buildings, 1994. Federal Highway Administration, Roadway Construction Noise Model (FHWA-HEP-05-054), January 2006. International Code Council, 2022 California Building Code, Title 24, Part 2, https://codes.iccsafe.org/content/CABC2022Pl /chapter-18-soils-and-foundations, accessed July 26, 2023. Kariel, H. G., Noise in Rural Recreational Environments, Canadian Acoustics 19(5), 3-10, 1991. M.J. Hayne, et al, Prediction of Crowd Noise, Acoustics, November 2006. South Coast Air Quality Management District, Draft Guidance Document — Interim CEQA Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Significance Threshold, October 2008. South Coast Air Quality Management District, Health Risk Assessment Guidance for Analyzing Cancer Risks from Mobile Source Diesel Emissions, December 2002. South Coast Air Quality Management District, Rule 1113 Architectural Coatings, http://www.agmd.gov/docs/default-source/rule-book/reg-xi/r1113.pdf, accessed June 15, 2023. Southern California Association of Governments, 2020-2045 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy — Connect SoCal, September 3, 2020. State of California Governor's Office of Planning and Research, Transmittal of the Governor's Office of Planning and Research's Proposed SB97 CEQA Guidelines Amendments to the Natural Resources Agency, April 13, 2009, https://planning.lacity.org/eir/CrossroadsHwd/deir/files/references/COl.pdf, accessed July 13, 2023. Urban Crossroads, Inc., Vista Heritage Global Academy Expansion Trip Generation Assessment, July 24, 2023. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Corps reclassifies Prado Damn, implements risk -reduction measures, https://www.spl.usace. army.mil/Media/News-Releases/Article/l849301/corps- reclassifies-prado-dam-implements-risk-reduction-measures/, May 15, 2019. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Carbon Monoxide Emissions, https://cfpub.epa.gov/roe/indicator—pdf.cfm?i=10, accessed July 3, 2023. Dec i y ouncil 26 — 410 1 /16/202 e 61 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Web Soil Survey, https://websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov/app/WebSoilSurvey.aspx, accessed July 26, 2023. Dec i y ouncil 26 — 411 1 /16/20'2 e 62 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 ATTACHMENT A AIR QUALITY/GREENHOUSE GAS/ENERGY MODELING RESULTS City Council 26 — 412 1/16/2024 Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report Table of Contents 1. Basic Project Information 1.1. Basic Project Information 1.2. Land Use Types 1.3. User -Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector 2. Emissions Summary 2.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against Thresholds 2.2. Construction Emissions by Year, Unmitigated 2.3. Construction Emissions by Year, Mitigated 2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds 2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated 2.6. Operations Emissions by Sector, Mitigated 3. Construction Emissions Details 3.1. Building Construction (2023) - Unmitigated 3.2. Building Construction (2023) - Mitigated City Council 26 — 413 1 / 63 1 /16/2024 Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 3.3. Building Construction (2024) - Unmitigated 3.4. Building Construction (2024) - Mitigated 3.5. Paving (2024) - Unmitigated 3.6. Paving (2024) - Mitigated 3.7. Architectural Coating (2024) - Unmitigated 3.8. Architectural Coating (2024) - Mitigated 4. Operations Emissions Details 4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use 4.1.1. Unmitigated 4.1.2. Mitigated 4.2. Energy 4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated 4.2.2. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Mitigated 4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated 4.2.4. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Mitigated 4.3. Area Emissions by Source 4.3.2. Unmitigated City Council 26 — 414 2/63 1 /16/2024 Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 4.3.1. Mitigated 4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use 4.4.2. Unmitigated 4.4.1. Mitigated 4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use 4.5.2. Unmitigated 4.5.1. Mitigated 4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use 4.6.1. Unmitigated 4.6.2. Mitigated 4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type 4.7.1. Unmitigated 4.7.2. Mitigated 4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type 4.8.1. Unmitigated 4.8.2. Mitigated 4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type City Council 26 — 415 3/63 1 /16/2024 Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 4.9.1. Unmitigated 4.9.2. Mitigated 4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type 4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated 4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated 4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated 4.10.4. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Mitigated 4.10.5. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Mitigated 4.10.6. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Mitigated 5. Activity Data 5.1. Construction Schedule 5.2. Off -Road Equipment 5.2.1. Unmitigated 5.2.2. Mitigated 5.3. Construction Vehicles 5.3.1. Unmitigated 5.3.2. Mitigated City Council 26 — 416 4/63 1 /16/2024 Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 5.4. Vehicles 5.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control Strategies 5.5. Architectural Coatings 5.6. Dust Mitigation 5.6.1. Construction Earthmoving Activities 5.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control Strategies 5.7. Construction Paving 5.8. Construction Electricity Consumption and Emissions Factors 5.9. Operational Mobile Sources 5.9.1. Unmitigated 5.9.2. Mitigated 5.10. Operational Area Sources 5.10.1. Hearths 5.10.1.1. Unmitigated 5.10.1.2. Mitigated 5.10.2. Architectural Coatings 5.10.3. Landscape Equipment City Council 26 — 417 5/63 1 /16/2024 Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 5.10.4. Landscape Equipment - Mitigated 5.11. Operational Energy Consumption 5.11.1. Unmitigated 5.11.2. Mitigated 5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption 5.12.1. Unmitigated 5.12.2. Mitigated 5.13. Operational Waste Generation 5.13.1. Unmitigated 5.13.2. Mitigated 5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment 5.14.1. Unmitigated 5.14.2. Mitigated 5.15. Operational Off -Road Equipment 5.15.1. Unmitigated 5.15.2. Mitigated 5.16. Stationary Sources City Council 26 — 418 6/63 1 /16/2024 Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 5.16.1. Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps 5.16.2. Process Boilers 5.17. User Defined 5.18. Vegetation 5.18.1. Land Use Change 5.18.1.1. Unmitigated 5.18.1.2. Mitigated 5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type 5.18.1.1. Unmitigated 5.18.1.2. Mitigated 5.18.2. Sequestration 5.18.2.1. Unmitigated 5.18.2.2. Mitigated 6. Climate Risk Detailed Report 6.1. Climate Risk Summary 6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores 6.3. Adjusted Climate Risk Scores City Council 26 — 419 7/63 1 /16/2024 Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 6.4. Climate Risk Reduction Measures 7. Health and Equity Details 7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores 7.2. Healthy Places Index Scores 7.3. Overall Health & Equity Scores 7.4. Health & Equity Measures 7.5. Evaluation Scorecard 7.6. Health & Equity Custom Measures 8. User Changes to Default Data City Council 26 — 420 8/63 1 /16/2024 Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 1. Basic Project Information 1.1. Basic Project Information Project Name Construction Start Date Operational Year Lead Agency Land Use Scale Analysis Level for Defaults Windspeed (m/s) Precipitation (days) Location County City Air District Air Basin TAZ EDFZ Electric Utility Gas Utility App Version • 11•' -191 Land Use Subtype L;� Vista Charter School Expansion 11 /1 /2023 2024 Project/site County 2.50 18.6 Santa Ana, CA, USA Orange Santa Ana South Coast AQMD South Coast 5990 7 Southern California Edison Southern California Gas 2022.1.1.14 9/63 Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 General Office 7.00 1000sgft 0.16 7,000 2,297 Building 1.3. User -Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector Construction C-10-C Construction C-11 Construction C-12 2. Emissions Summary 2.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against Thresholds Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Unmit. 0.70 0.89 4.59 6.38 0.01 0.21 0.23 0.44 0.19 0.05 0.25 - Mit. 0.70 0.89 4.59 6.38 0.01 0.21 0.23 0.44 0.19 0.05 0.25 - Reduced Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Unmit. 0.71 0.59 5.98 7.14 0.01 0.28 0.23 0.44 0.26 0.05 0.27 - Mit. 0.71 0.59 5.98 7.14 0.01 0.28 0.23 0.44 0.26 0.05 0.27 - Reduced Water Unpaved Construction Roads Limit Vehicle Speeds on Unpaved Roads Sweep Paved Roads 1,061 1,061 0.04 0.01 0.97 1,067 1,061 1,061 0.04 0.01 0.97 1,067 1,372 1,372 0.06 0.02 0.03 1,378 1,372 1,372 0.06 0.02 0.03 1,378 City Council 26 - 422 1/16/2024 10/63 Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily (Max) Unmit. 0.18 0.24 1.31 1.71 < 0.005 0.06 0.03 0.09 0.05 0.01 0.06 - Mit. 0.18 0.24 1.31 1.71 < 0.005 0.06 0.03 0.09 0.05 0.01 0.06 - Reduced Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - (Max) Unmit. 0.03 0.04 0.24 0.31 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 0.01 - Mit. 0.03 0.04 0.24 0.31 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 0.01 - Reduced 2.2. Construction Emissions by Year, Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Daily - - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) 2024 0.70 0.89 4.59 6.38 0.01 0.21 0.23 0.44 0.19 0.05 0.25 - Daily - - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) 2023 0.71 0.59 5.98 7.14 0.01 0.28 0.04 0.32 0.26 0.01 0.27 - 2024 0.70 0.59 5.65 7.11 0.01 0.26 0.23 0.44 0.24 0.05 0.25 - Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily 2023 0.08 0.07 0.71 0.85 < 0.005 0.03 < 0.005 0.04 0.03 < 0.005 0.03 - 2024 0.18 0.24 1.31 1.71 < 0.005 0.06 0.03 0.09 0.05 0.01 0.06 - Annual - G-ity Cou-ncil - - - - -26 - 423 - - - 11 / 63 301 301 0.01 < 0.005 0.06 303 301 301 0.01 < 0.005 0.06 303 49.9 49.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 50.1 49.9 49.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 50.1 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e 1,061 1,061 0.04 0.01 0.97 1,067 1,372 1,372 0.06 0.02 0.01 1,378 1,371 1,371 0.06 0.02 0.03 1,377 164 164 0.01 < 0.005 0.01 165 301 301 0.01 < 0.005 0.06 303 - - - 1 /1-&/2024 - - Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 2023 0.02 0.01 0.13 0.16 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 0.01 - 2024 0.03 0.04 0.24 0.31 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 0.01 - 2.3. Construction Emissions by Year, Mitigated Criteria Pollutants(lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual and GHGs(lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual Daily - - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) 2024 0.70 0.89 4.59 6.38 0.01 0.21 0.23 0.44 0.19 0.05 0.25 - Daily - - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) 2023 0.71 0.59 5.98 7.14 0.01 0.28 0.04 0.32 0.26 0.01 0.27 - 2024 0.70 0.59 5.65 7.11 0.01 0.26 0.23 0.44 0.24 0.05 0.25 - Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily 2023 0.08 0.07 0.71 0.85 < 0.005 0.03 < 0.005 0.04 0.03 < 0.005 0.03 - 2024 0.18 0.24 1.31 1.71 < 0.005 0.06 0.03 0.09 0.05 0.01 0.06 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - 2023 0.02 0.01 0.13 0.16 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 0.01 - 2024 0.03 0.04 0.24 0.31 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 0.01 - 2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer KA ..\ 27.1 27.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 27.2 49.9 49.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 50.1 1,061 1,061 0.04 0.01 0.97 1,067 1,372 1,372 0.06 0.02 0.01 1,378 1,371 1,371 0.06 0.02 0.03 1,377 164 164 0.01 < 0.005 0.01 165 301 301 0.01 < 0.005 0.06 303 27.1 27.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 27.2 49.9 49.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 50.1 City Council 26 - 424 12/63 1 /16/2024 Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Unmit. 0.35 0.49 0.23 2.30 < 0.005 0.01 0.40 0.41 0.01 0.10 0.11 5.89 709 715 0.64 0.03 1.87 741 Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Unmit. 0.30 0.44 0.24 1.89 < 0.005 0.01 0.40 0.41 0.01 0.10 0.11 5.89 691 696 0.64 0.03 0.07 721 Average - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily (Max) Unmit. 0.26 0.40 0.20 1.66 < 0.005 0.01 0.30 0.31 0.01 0.08 0.08 5.89 585 591 0.63 0.02 0.62 614 Annual- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (Max) Unmit. 0.05 0.07 0.04 0.30 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 0.06 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 0.98 96.8 97.8 0.10 < 0.005 0.10 102 2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/dav for dailv. ton/vr for annual) and GHGs (lb/dav for dailv. MT/vr for annual) Daily, Summer (Max) Mobile 0.29 0.27 0.18 1.95 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.40 0.41 < 0.005 0.10 0.11 - 457 457 0.02 0.02 1.86 465 Area 0.05 0.22 < 0.005 0.30 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - 1.25 1.25 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 1.26 Energy 0.01 < 0.005 0.05 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - 239 239 0.02 < 0.005 - 240 Water - - - - - - - - - - - 2.38 12.6 15.0 0.25 0.01 - 22.8 Waste - - - - - - - - - - - 3.51 0.00 3.51 0.35 0.00 - 12.3 Refrig. - - - - - - - - - - - - 0.02 0.02 Total 0.35 0.49 0.23 2.30 < 0.005 0.01 0.40 0.41 0.01 0.10 0.11 5.89 709 715 0.64 0.03 1.87 741 Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Mobile 0.29 n 97 n 9n 1 aF < n nns < n nns n 4n n 41 < n nns n i n n 11 - 4�a 41a n ni n ro 0.05 446 City Council 26 - 425 1/16/2024 13/63 Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Area - 0.17 - - Energy 0.01 < 0.005 0.05 0.04 Water - - - - Waste - - - - Refrig. - - - - Total 0.30 0.44 0.24 1.89 Average - - - - Daily Mobile 0.22 0.20 0.15 1.41 Area 0.04 0.20 < 0.005 0.21 Energy 0.01 < 0.005 0.05 0.04 Water - - - - Waste - - - - Refrig. - - - - Total 0.26 0.40 0.20 1.66 Annual - - - - Mobile 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.26 Area 0.01 0.04 < 0.005 0.04 Energy < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 Water - - - - Waste - - - - Refrig. - - - - Total 0.05 0.07 0.04 0.30 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 0.01 0.40 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.30 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 0.01 0.30 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 2.6. Operations Emissions by Sector, Mitigated < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - 239 239 0.02 < 0.005 - 240 2.38 12.6 15.0 0.25 0.01 - 22.8 - - - - 3.51 0.00 3.51 0.35 0.00 - 12.3 - - - - - - - - - 0.02 0.02 0.41 0.01 0.10 0.11 5.89 691 696 0.64 0.03 0.07 721 0.30 < 0.005 0.08 0.08 - 333 333 0.02 0.01 0.60 338 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - 0.86 0.86 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 0.86 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - 239 239 0.02 < 0.005 - 240 - - - - 2.38 12.6 15.0 0.25 0.01 - 22.8 - - - - 3.51 0.00 3.51 0.35 0.00 - 12.3 - - - - - - - - - 0.02 0.02 0.31 0.01 0.08 0.08 5.89 585 591 0.63 0.02 0.62 614 0.06 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 - 55.1 55.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.10 56.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - 0.14 0.14 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 0.14 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - 39.5 39.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 39.7 - - - - 0.39 2.08 2.48 0.04 < 0.005 - 3.78 - - - - 0.58 0.00 0.58 0.06 0.00 - 2.03 - - - - - - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 0.98 96.8 97.8 0.10 < 0.005 0.10 102 Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) CO2e Ou 14/63 Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Daily, Summer (Max) Mobile 0.29 0.27 0.18 1.95 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.40 0.41 < 0.005 0.10 0.11 - 457 457 0.02 0.02 1.86 465 Area 0.05 0.22 < 0.005 0.30 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - 1.25 1.25 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 1.26 Energy 0.01 < 0.005 0.05 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - 239 239 0.02 < 0.005 - 240 Water - - - - - - - - - - - 2.38 12.6 15.0 0.25 0.01 - 22.8 Waste - - - - - - - - - - - 3.51 0.00 3.51 0.35 0.00 - 12.3 Refrig. - - - - - - - - - - - - 0.02 0.02 Total 0.35 0.49 0.23 2.30 < 0.005 0.01 0.40 0.41 0.01 0.10 0.11 5.89 709 715 0.64 0.03 1.87 741 Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Mobile 0.29 0.27 0.20 1.85 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.40 0.41 < 0.005 0.10 0.11 - 439 439 0.03 0.02 0.05 446 Area - 0.17 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Energy 0.01 < 0.005 0.05 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - 239 239 0.02 < 0.005 - 240 Water - - - - - - - - - - - 2.38 12.6 15.0 0.25 0.01 - 22.8 Waste - - - - - - - - - - - 3.51 0.00 3.51 0.35 0.00 - 12.3 Refrig. - - - - - - - - - - - - 0.02 0.02 Total 0.30 0.44 0.24 1.89 < 0.005 0.01 0.40 0.41 0.01 0.10 0.11 5.89 691 696 0.64 0.03 0.07 721 Average - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Mobile 0.22 0.20 0.15 1.41 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.30 0.30 < 0.005 0.08 0.08 - 333 333 0.02 0.01 0.60 338 Area 0.04 0.20 < 0.005 0.21 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - 0.86 0.86 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 0.86 Energy 0.01 < 0.005 0.05 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - 239 239 0.02 < 0.005 - 240 Water - - - - - - - - - - - 2.38 12.6 15.0 0.25 0.01 - 22.8 Waste - - - - - - - - - - - 3.51 0.00 3.51 0.35 0.00 - 12.3 Refrig. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0.02 0.02 Total 0.26 9.49-9.29 4.66 49.996 9.94 939 @.;4 9.94 9.98 9.989-89 686 694 9.6; 9.920.62 614 City Council 26 - 427 1/16/2024 15/63 Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Annual Mobile 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.26 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 0.06 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 - 55.1 55.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.10 56.0 Area 0.01 0.04 < 0.005 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - 0.14 0.14 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 0.14 Energy < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - 39.5 39.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 39.7 Water - - - - - - - - - - - 0.39 2.08 2.48 0.04 < 0.005 - 3.78 Waste - - - - - - - - - - - 0.58 0.00 0.58 0.06 0.00 - 2.03 Refrig. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 Total 0.05 0.07 0.04 0.30 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 0.06 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 0.98 96.8 97.8 0.10 < 0.005 0.10 102 3. Construction Emissions Details 3.1. Building Construction (2023) - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Onsite Daily, - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Off -Road 0.69 0.58 5.93 7.00 0.01 0.28 - 0.28 0.26 - 0.26 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Average Daily Off -Road 0.08 0.07 0.71 0.84 < 0.005 0.03 - 0.03 0.03 - 0.03 - Equipment iNBCO2 CO2T CH4 N20 R CO2e 1,305 1,305 0.05 0.01 - 1,309 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 156 156 0.01 < 0.005 - 156 City Council 26 - 428 1/16/2024 16/63 Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Off -Road 0.02 0.01 0.13 0.15 < 0.005 0.01 - 0.01 0.01 - 0.01 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - Summer (Max) Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 3.2. Building Construction (2023) - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/dav for daily. ton/vr for annual) and GHGs (lb/dav for dailv. MT/vr for annual) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 25.8 25.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 25.9 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 29.5 29.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 29.8 37.6 37.6 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 39.2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.57 3.57 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 3.62 4.49 4.49 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 4.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.59 0.59 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.60 0.74 0.74 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.78 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 17/63 CO2e Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Onsite - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, Summer (Max) Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Off -Road 0.69 0.58 5.93 7.00 0.01 0.28 - 0.28 0.26 - 0.26 - 1,305 1,305 0.05 0.01 - 1,309 Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck Average - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Off -Road 0.08 0.07 0.71 0.84 < 0.005 0.03 - 0.03 0.03 - 0.03 - 156 156 0.01 < 0.005 - 156 Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Off -Road 0.02 0.01 0.13 0.15 < 0.005 0.01 - 0.01 0.01 - 0.01 - 25.8 25.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 25.9 Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck Offsite - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 - 29.5 29.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 29.8 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 37.6 37.6 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 39.2 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 City Council 26 - 430 1/16/2024 18/63 Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Average Daily Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 3.3. Building Construction (2024) - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Onsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Off -Road 0.67 0.56 5.60 6.98 0.01 0.26 - 0.26 0.23 - 0.23 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Average - - - - - - - - - Daily Off -Road 0.08 0.07 0.66 0.82 < 0.005 0.03 - 0.03 0.03 - 0.03 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Annual - City Council - - - - -26 - 4ra1 - - - 19/63 3.57 3.57 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 3.62 4.49 4.49 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 4.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.59 0.59 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.60 0.74 0.74 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.78 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 iNBCO2 CO2T CH4 N20 R CO2e 1,305 1,305 0.05 0.01 - 1,309 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 153 153 0.01 < 0.005 - 154 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 /1-&/2024 - - - - - Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Off -Road 0.01 0.01 0.12 0.15 < 0.005 0.01 - 0.01 0.01 - 0.01 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Daily, - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 3.4. Building Construction (2024) - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Onsite - - - - - - - - - - - - 25.4 25.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 25.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 28.9 28.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 29.2 37.2 37.2 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 38.8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.44 3.44 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 3.48 4.36 4.36 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 4.55 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.57 0.57 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.58 0.72 0.72 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 City Council 26 - 432 1/16/2024 20 / 63 Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Off -Road 0.67 0.56 5.60 6.98 0.01 0.26 - 0.26 0.23 - 0.23 - 1,305 1,305 0.05 0.01 - 1,309 Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck Average - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Off -Road 0.08 0.07 0.66 0.82 < 0.005 0.03 - 0.03 0.03 - 0.03 - 153 153 0.01 < 0.005 - 154 Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Off -Road 0.01 0.01 0.12 0.15 < 0.005 0.01 - 0.01 0.01 - 0.01 - 25.4 25.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 25.5 Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck Offsite - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 - 28.9 28.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 29.2 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 37.2 37.2 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 38.8 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily City Council 26 - 433 1/16/2024 21 / 63 Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 3.5. Paving (2024) - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Onsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Off -Road 0.63 0.53 4.52 5.32 0.01 0.21 - 0.21 0.19 - 0.19 - Equipment Paving - 0.00 - - - - - - - - - - Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Off -Road 0.63 0.53 4.52 5.32 0.01 0.21 - 0.21 0.19 - 0.19 - Equipment Paving - 0.00 - - - - - - - - - - Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Average - - - - - - - - - - Daily 3.44 3.44 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 3.48 4.36 4.36 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 4.55 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.57 0.57 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.58 0.72 0.72 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 823 823 0.03 0.01 - 826 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 823 823 0.03 0.01 - 826 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 City Council 26 - 434 1/16/2024 22/63 Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Off -Road 0.07 0.06 0.53 0.63 < 0.005 0.02 - 0.02 0.02 - 0.02 - Equipment Paving - 0.00 - - - - - - - - Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Off -Road 0.01 0.01 0.10 0.11 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - Equipment Paving - 0.00 - - - - - - - - - - Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Worker 0.07 0.06 0.07 1.05 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.05 0.05 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Worker 0.07 0.06 0.08 0.91 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.05 0.05 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker < 0.005 E;ft. D0SoUP'0p5 0.02 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 205- 4W < 0.005 < 0.005 - 23 / 63 97.0 97.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 97.3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 16.1 16.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 16.1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 237 237 < 0.005 0.01 0.97 241 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 226 226 < 0.005 0.01 0.03 228 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 27.0 27.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 27.3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 < 0.0051 /1602024 0.01 4.52 4.46 4.46 Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 3.6. Paving (2024) - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants(lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual and GHGs(lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual Onsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Off -Road 0.63 0.53 4.52 5.32 0.01 0.21 - 0.21 0.19 - 0.19 - Equipment Paving - 0.00 - - - - - - - - - - Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Off -Road 0.63 0.53 4.52 5.32 0.01 0.21 - 0.21 0.19 - 0.19 - Equipment Paving - 0.00 - - - - - - - - - - Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Off -Road 0.07 0.06 0.53 0.63 < 0.005 0.02 - 0.02 0.02 - 0.02 - Equipment Paving - 0.00 - - - - - - - - - - Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Hnnuai - - - - - - - - - - City Council 26 - 436 24/63 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 823 823 0.03 0.01 - 826 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 823 823 0.03 0.01 - 826 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 97.0 97.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 97.3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 /16/2024 Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Off -Road 0.01 0.01 0.10 0.11 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - Equipment Paving - 0.00 - - - - - - - - Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Worker 0.07 0.06 0.07 1.05 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.05 0.05 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Worker 0.07 0.06 0.08 0.91 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.05 0.05 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 3.7. Architectural Coating (2024) - Unmitigated Criteria Poll utant9k/99YOIdaily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/O f0 agily, MT/yr for annual) 25 / 63 16.1 16.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 16.1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 237 237 < 0.005 0.01 0.97 241 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 226 226 < 0.005 0.01 0.03 228 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 27.0 27.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 27.3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.46 4.46 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 4.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 /16/2024 Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Onsite Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Off -Road 0.17 0.14 0.91 1.15 < 0.005 0.03 - 0.03 0.03 - 0.03 - Equipment Architect - 0.75 - - - - - - - - - ural Coatings Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Off -Road 0.02 0.02 0.11 0.14 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - Equipment Architect - 0.09 - - - - - - - - - - ural Coatings Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Off -Road < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - Equipment Architect - 0.02 - - - - - - - - - - ural Coatings Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite - - - - - - - - - - - - 134 134 0.01 < 0.005 - 134 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 15.7 15.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 15.8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.60 2.60 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 2.61 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 City Council 26 - 438 1/16/2024 26 / 63 Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 3.8. Architectural Coating (2024) - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Onsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Off -Road 0.17 0.14 0.91 1.15 < 0.005 0.03 - 0.03 0.03 - 0.03 - Equipment Architect - 0.75 - - - - - - - - - - urA 6.07 6.07 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 6.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.69 0.69 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.11 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N20 R CO2e 0.00.005 134 Coatings City Council 26 - 439 27 / 63 1 /16/2024 Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck Daily, - - - - - Winter (Max) Average - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Off -Road 0.02 0.02 0.11 0.14 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - 15.7 15.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 15.8 Equipment Architect - 0.09 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ural Coatings Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck Annual - - - - - - - - - - Off -Road < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - 2.60 2.60 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 2.61 Equipment Architect - 0.02 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ural Coatings Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck Offsite - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 6.07 6.07 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 6.16 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Average - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily City Council 26 - 440 1/16/2024 28 / 63 Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 4. Operations Emissions Details 4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use 4.1.1. Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) General 0.29 0.27 0.18 1.95 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.40 0.41 < 0.005 0.10 0.11 - Office Building Total 0.29 0.27 0.18 1.95 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.40 0.41 < 0.005 0.10 0.11 - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) General 0.29 0.27 0.20 1.85 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.40 0.41 < 0.005 0.10 0.11 - Office Building Total 0.29 0.27 0.20 1.85 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.40 0.41 < 0.005 0.10 0.11 - Annual - City Council - - - - -26 - 441 - - 29 / 63 0.69 0.69 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.11 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CO2e 457 457 0.02 0.02 1.86 465 457 457 0.02 0.02 1.86 465 439 439 0.03 0.02 0.05 446 439 439 0.03 0.02 0.05 446 1 /1-r/2024 - - Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 General 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.26 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 0.06 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 - 55.1 55.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.10 56.0 Office Building Total 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.26 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 0.06 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 - 55.1 55.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.10 56.0 4.1.2. Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) General 0.29 0.27 0.18 1.95 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.40 0.41 < 0.005 0.10 0.11 - 457 457 0.02 0.02 1.86 465 Office Building Total 0.29 0.27 0.18 1.95 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.40 0.41 < 0.005 0.10 0.11 - 457 457 0.02 0.02 1.86 465 Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) General 0.29 0.27 0.20 1.85 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.40 0.41 < 0.005 0.10 0.11 - 439 439 0.03 0.02 0.05 446 Office Building Total 0.29 0.27 0.20 1.85 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.40 0.41 < 0.005 0.10 0.11 - 439 439 0.03 0.02 0.05 446 Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - General 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.26 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 0.06 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 - 55.1 55.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.10 56.0 Office Building Total 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.26 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 0.06 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 - 55.1 55.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.10 56.0 4.2. Energy 4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated City Council 26 - 442 1/16/2024 30/63 Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Summer (Max) General — — — — — — — — — — — — 182 182 0.01 < 0.005 — 182 Office Building Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 182 182 0.01 < 0.005 — 182 Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Winter (Max) General — — — — — — — — — — — — 182 182 0.01 < 0.005 — 182 Office Building Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 182 182 0.01 < 0.005 — 182 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — General — — — — — — — — — — — — 30.1 30.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 30.2 Office Building Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 30.1 30.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 30.2 4.2.2. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Summer (Max) General — — — — — — — — — — — — 182 182 0.01 < 0.005 — 182 Office Building City Council 26 — 443 1/16/2024 31 / 63 Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Total - - - - - - - - - - - - 182 182 0.01 < 0.005 - 182 Daily, - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) General - - - - - - - - - - - - 182 182 0.01 < 0.005 - 182 Office Building Total - - - - - - - - - - - - 182 182 0.01 < 0.005 - 182 Annual- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - General - - - - - - - - - - - - 30.1 30.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 30.2 Office Building Total - - - - - - - - - - - - 30.1 30.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 30.2 4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Daily, Summer (Max) General 0.01 < 0.005 0.05 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - 56.9 56.9 0.01 < 0.005 - 57.0 Office Building Total 0.01 < 0.005 0.05 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - 56.9 56.9 0.01 < 0.005 - 57.0 Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) General 0.01 < 0.005 0.05 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - 56.9 56.9 0.01 < 0.005 - 57.0 Office Building Total 0.01 < 0.005 0.05 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - 56.9 56.9 0.01 < 0.005 - 57.0 Annual - Gity Council - - - - -26 - 444 - - - - - - 1 /1-&/2024 32/63 Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 General < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - 9.41 9.41 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 9.44 Office Building Total < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - 9.41 9.41 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 9.44 4.2.4. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land TOG ROG NOx CO S02 �PMIIOE �PM10D �PMIIOT �PM2.51E �PM2.51D �PM2.5`r �BCO2 �NBCO2 �CO2`r �CH4 �N20 R �CO2e Use Daily, Summer (Max) General 0.01 < 0.005 0.05 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - 56.9 56.9 0.01 < 0.005 - 57.0 Office Building Total 0.01 < 0.005 0.05 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - 56.9 56.9 0.01 < 0.005 - 57.0 Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) General 0.01 < 0.005 0.05 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - 56.9 56.9 0.01 < 0.005 - 57.0 Office Building Total 0.01 < 0.005 0.05 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - 56.9 56.9 0.01 < 0.005 - 57.0 Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - General < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - 9.41 9.41 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 9.44 Office Building Total < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - 9.41 9.41 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 9.44 4.3. Area Emissions by Source 4.3.2. Unmitigated City Council 26 - 445 1/16/2024 33/63 Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Summer (Max) Consum — 0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — er Products Architect — 0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — ural Coatings Landsca 0.05 0.05 < 0.005 0.30 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 1.25 1.25 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.26 pe Equipme nt Total 0.05 0.22 < 0.005 0.30 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 1.25 1.25 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.26 Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Winter (Max) Consum — 0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — er Products Architect — 0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — ural Coatings Total — 0.17 — — — — — — — — — — Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Consum — 0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — er Products Architect — < 0.005 — — — — — — — — — — ural Coatings City Council 26 — 446 1/16/2024 34/63 Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Landsca 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - 0.14 0.14 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 0.14 pe Equipme Total 0.01 0.04 < 0.005 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - 0.14 0.14 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 0.14 4.3.1. Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Consum - 0.15 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - er Products Architect - 0.02 - - - - - - - - - - - - - ural Coatings Landsca 0.05 0.05 < 0.005 0.30 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - 1.25 1.25 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 1.26 pe Equipme nt Total 0.05 0.22 < 0.005 0.30 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - 1.25 1.25 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 1.26 Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Consum - 0.15 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - er Products Architect - 0.02 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ural Coatings Total - 0.17 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - City Council 26 - 447 1/16/2024 35/63 Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Consum - 0.03 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - er Architect - < 0.005 - - - - - - - - - - ural Coatings Landsca 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - 0.14 0.14 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 0.14 pe Equipme nt Total 0.01 0.04 < 0.005 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - 0.14 0.14 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 0.14 4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use 4.4.2. Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) General - - - - - - - - - - - 2.38 12.6 15.0 0.25 0.01 - 22.8 Office Building Total - - - - - - - - - - - 2.38 12.6 15.0 0.25 0.01 - 22.8 Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) General - - - - - - - 2.38 12.6 15.0 0.25 0.01 - 22.8 Office Building Total - - - - - - - - - - - 2.38 12.6 15.0 0.25 0.01 - 22.8 Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - City Council 26 - 448 1/16/2024 36/63 Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 General - - - - - - - - - - - Office Building Total - - - - - - - - - - - 4.4.1. Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) 0.39 2.08 2.48 0.04 < 0.005 - 3.78 0.39 2.08 2.48 0.04 < 0.005 - 3.78 Land TOG ROG NOx CO S02 �PMIIOE �PM10D �PMIIOT �PM2.51E �PM2.51D �PM2.5`r �BCO2 �NBCO2 ICO2T �CH4 �N20 R �CO2e Use D. Summer 0.01 22.8 Office Building Total - - - - - - - - - - - 2.38 12.6 15.0 0.25 0.01 - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) General - - - - - - - - - - - 2.38 12.6 15.0 0.25 0.01 - Office Building Total - - - - - - - - - - - 2.38 12.6 15.0 0.25 0.01 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - General - - - - - - - - - - - 0.39 2.08 2.48 0.04 < 0.005 - Office Building Total - - - - - - - - - - - 0.39 2.08 2.48 0.04 < 0.005 - 4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use 4.5.2. Unmitigated City Council 26 - 449 1/16/2024 37/63 22.8 22.8 22.8 3.78 Mi.] Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) General - - - - - - - - - - - 3.51 0.00 3.51 0.35 0.00 - 12.3 Office Building Total - - - - - - - - - - - 3.51 0.00 3.51 0.35 0.00 - 12.3 Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) General - - - - - - - - - - - 3.51 0.00 3.51 0.35 0.00 - 12.3 Office Building Total - - - - - - - - - - - 3.51 0.00 3.51 0.35 0.00 - 12.3 Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - General - - - - - - - - - - - 0.58 0.00 0.58 0.06 0.00 - 2.03 Office Building Total - - - - - - - - - - - 0.58 0.00 0.58 0.06 0.00 - 2.03 4.5.1. Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) General - - - - - - - - - - - 3.51 0.00 3.51 0.35 0.00 - 12.3 Office Building City Council 26 - 450 1/16/2024 38 / 63 Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Total - - - - - - - - - - - 3.51 0.00 3.51 0.35 0.00 - 12.3 Daily, - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) General - - - - - - - - - - - 3.51 0.00 3.51 0.35 0.00 - 12.3 Office Building Total - - - - - - - - - - - 3.51 0.00 3.51 0.35 0.00 - 12.3 Annual General - - - - - - - - - - - 0.58 0.00 0.58 0.06 0.00 - 2.03 Office Building Total - - - - - - - - - - - 0.58 0.00 0.58 0.06 0.00 - 2.03 4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use 4.6.1. Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Daily, Summer (Max) General - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0.02 0.02 Office Building Total - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0.02 0.02 Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) General - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0.02 0.02 Office Building City Council 26 - 451 1/16/2024 39/63 Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.02 0.02 Annual — — — — General — — — — — < 0.005 < 0.005 Office Building Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — < 0.005 < 0.005 4.6.2. Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Summer (Max) General — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.02 0.02 Office Building Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.02 0.02 Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Winter (Max) General — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.02 0.02 Office Building Total 0.02 0.02 Annual — — — — — — — — General — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — < 0.005 < 0.005 Office Building Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — < 0.005 < 0.005 4.7. Offroad Ity oQQORRQuncll 26 — 452 1/16/2024 40 / 63 Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 4.7.1. Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) nt Equipme NEENNEENEEN - Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Summer (Max) Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Winter (Max) Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 4.7.2. Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Summer (Max) Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Winter (Max) Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Annual— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — City Council 26 — 453 1/16/2024 41 / 63 Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type 4.8.1. Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Summer (Max) Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Winter (Max) Total — — — — — — — — — — — Annual— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 4.8.2. Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipme nt Type Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Summer (Max) Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Winter (Max) Total — — City Council 26 — 454 1/16/2024 42 / 63 Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type 4.9.1. Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) nt Equipme - Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Summer (Max) Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Winter (Max) Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Annual— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 4.9.2. Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Summer (Max) Total— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — City Council 26 — 455 1/16/2024 43 / 63 Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Winter (Max) Total — — — — — — Annual— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type 4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Summer (Max) Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Winter (Max) Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Total— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/dav for dailv. ton/vr for annual) and GHGs (lb/dav for dailv. MT/vr for annual) Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Summer (Max) City Council 26 — 456 1/16/2024 44/63 Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Total — — — — — — — — — — — — Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — Winter (Max) Total — — — — — — — — — — — — Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — Summer (Max) Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — Sequest — — — — — — — — — — — — ered Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — Remove — — — — — — — — — — — — d Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — Daily, — — — — — — — Winter (Max) Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — Sequest — — — — — — — — — — — — ered Subtotal — City Council _ _ _ _ _26 — 457 _ _ 45/63 1 /16/2024 _ Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Remove — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Subtotal — — — — — — Annual — Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Sequest — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — ered Subtotal — — — — Remove — — — — — — — — — d Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 4.10.4. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Summer (Max) Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Winter (Max) Total — — — — — — — — — — — Annual— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — City Council 26 — 458 1/16/2024 46 / 63 Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 4.10.5. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Summer (Max) Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Winter (Max) Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Annual— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 4.10.6. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Summer (Max) Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Sequest — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — ered Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Remove — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — d Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — - - CRY Council — — — — —26 — 459 — — — — — — 1/1-6/2024 — — 47 / 63 Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Daily, Winter (Max) Avoided Subtotal Sequest ered Subtotal Remove d Subtotal Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Sequest — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — ered Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Remove — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — d Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 5. Activity Data 5.1. Construction Schedule Building Construction Building Construction 11/1/2023 2/29/2024 5.00 87.0 — Paving City oun�il Z 460 1/16/2024 48/63 Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 5.2. Off -Road Equipment 5.2.1. Unmitigated Building Construction Cranes Diesel Building Construction Forklifts Diesel Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backh Diesel oes Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backh Diesel oes Paving Cement and Mortar Diesel Mixers Paving Pavers Diesel Paving Rollers Diesel Architectural Coating Air Compressors Diesel 5.2.2. Mitigated 5/1 /2024 6/30/2024 5.00 43.0 - Average 1.00 4.00 367 0.29 Average 2.00 6.00 82.0 0.20 Average 2.00 8.00 84.0 0.37 Average 1.00 7.00 84.0 0.37 Average 4.00 6.00 10.0 0.56 Average 1.00 7.00 81.0 0.42 Average 1.00 7.00 36.0 0.38 Average 1.00 6.00 37.0 0.48 Building Construction Cranes Diesel Average 1.00 4.00 367 0.29 Building Construction Forklifts Diesel Average 2.00 6.00 82.0 0.20 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backh Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 84.0 0.37 oes Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backh Diesel Average 1.00 7.00 84.0 0.37 oes Paving Cement and Mortar Diesel Average 4.00 6.00 10.0 0.56 Mixers Paving FaAers City Council Diesel Average 26 - 461uu 1/16/20 49/63 Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Paving Rollers Diesel Average 1.00 7.00 36.0 0.38 Architectural Coating Air Compressors Diesel Average 1.00 6.00 37.0 0.48 5.3. Construction Vehicles 5.3.1. Unmitigated Building Construction Building Construction Worker 2.24 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 Building Construction Vendor 1.15 10.2 HHDTMHDT Building Construction Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT Building Construction Onsite truck — — HHDT Paving — — — — Paving Worker 17.5 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 Paving Vendor — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT Paving Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT Paving Onsite truck — — HHDT Architectural Coating — — — — Architectural Coating Worker 0.45 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 Architectural Coating Vendor — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT Architectural Coating Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT Architectural Coating Onsite truck — — HHDT 5.3.2. Mitigated Building Construction — Building ConstructionCity Council Worker 2.24 26 — 462 18.5 LDAPT6,M24 50/63 Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Building Construction Vendor 1.15 10.2 HHDT,MHDT Building Construction Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT Building Construction Onsite truck — — HHDT Paving — — — — Paving Worker 17.5 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 Paving Vendor — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT Paving Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT Paving Onsite truck — — HHDT Architectural Coating — — — — Architectural Coating Worker 0.45 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 Architectural Coating Vendor — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT Architectural Coating Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT Architectural Coating Onsite truck — — HHDT 5.4. Vehicles 5.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control Strategies Non -applicable. No control strategies activated by user. 5.5. Architectural Coatings Architectural Coating 0.00 0.00 10,500 3,500 — 5.6. Dust Mitigation 5.6.1. Construction Earthmoving Activities Phase Name iviaieriai irnpvried kcY) iviaieriai �xp • • s uraded �acresj iviaieriai uernoiisned �sy. ii.j • , Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Paving 0.00 0.00 5.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control Strategies Water Exposed Area 3 5.7. Construction Paving General Office Building 0.00 5.8. Construction Electricity Consumption and Emissions Factors kWh per Year and Emission Factor (lb/MWh) kWh per Year • 2023 0.00 532 2024 0.00 532 5.9. Operational Mobile Sources 5.9.1. Unmitigated General Office 84.0 Building 5.9.2. Mitigated 15.5 4.90 22,962 0.00 74% 570 0.03 0.03 WE 0% 105 74% wl < 0.005 < 0.005 33.3 155,892 City Council 26 — 464 1/16/2024 52/63 Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 General Office 84.0 15.5 4.90 22,962 570 Building 5.10. Operational Area Sources 5.10.1. Hearths 5.10.1.1. Unmitigated 5.10.1.2. Mitigated 5.10.2. Architectural Coatings C no 10,500 3,500 105 5.10.3. Landscape Equipment Snow Days day/yr 0.00 Summer Days day/yr 250 5.10.4. Landscape Equipment - Mitigated Snow Days Summer Days 5.11. Operational Energy Consumption City Council day/yr 0.00 day/yr 250 26 — 465 53/63 33.3 155,892 1 /16/2024 Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 5.11.1. Unmitigated Electricity (kWh/yr) and CO2 and CH4 and N20 and Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) .all, • General Office Building 124,742 532 0.0330 5.11.2. Mitigated Electricity (kWh/yr) and CO2 and CH4 and N20 and Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Electricity (kWh/yr)• M General Office Building 124,742 532 0.0330 5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption 5.12.1. Unmitigated General Office Building 5.12.2. Mitigated General Office Building 5.13. Operational Waste Generation 5.13.1. Unmitigated 1,244,136 1,244,136 Land Use -M M- General Office Building 6.51 City Council 26 — 466 54/63 0.0040 0.0040 29,770 29,770 177,425 177,425 1 /16/2024 Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 5.13.2. Mitigated General Office Building 6.51 5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment 5.14.1. Unmitigated General Office Building Household refrigerators R-134a and/or freezers General Office Building Other commercial A/C R-410A and heat pumps 5.14.2. Mitigated General Office Building Household refrigerators R-134a and/or freezers General Office Building Other commercial A/C R-410A and heat pumps 5.15. Operational Off -Road Equipment 5.15.1. Unmitigated 5.15.2. Mitigated 1,430 0.02 0.60 0.00 1.00 2,088 < 0.005 4.00 4.00 18.0 1,430 0.02 0.60 0.00 1.00 2,088 < 0.005 4.00 4.00 18.0 55/63 1/1 Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 5.16. Stationary Sources 5.16.1. Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps Equipment Type Fuel Type Number per Day Hours per Day Hours per Year Horsepower Load Factor 5.16.2. Process Boilers 5.17. User Defined 5.18. Vegetation 5.18.1. Land Use Change 5.18.1.1. Unmitigated 5.18.1.2. Mitigated 5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type 5.18.1.1. Unmitigated Biomass Cover Type ,Njlszmojql Lei Initial Acres Final Acres 56 / 63 Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 5.18.1.2. Mitigated 5.18.2. Sequestration 5.18.2.1. Unmitigated 5.18.2.2. Mitigated 6. Climate Risk Detailed Report 6.1. Climate Risk Summary Cal -Adapt midcentury 2040-2059 average projections for four hazards are reported below for your project location. These are under Representation Concentration Pathway (RCP) 8.5 which assumes GHG emissions will continue to rise stronqlv throuqh 2050 and then plateau around 2100. Temperature and Extreme Heat 9.03 annual days of extreme heat Extreme Precipitation 3.50 annual days with precipitation above 20 mm Sea Level Rise 0.00 meters of inundation depth Wildfire 1.31 annual hectares burned Temperature and Extreme Heat data are for grid cell in which your project are located. The projection is based on the 98th historical percentile of daily maximum/minimum temperatures from observed historical data (32 climate model ensemble from Cal -Adapt, 2040-2059 average under RCP 8.5). Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi. Extreme Precipitation data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The threshold of 20 mm is equivalent to about 3/4 an inch of rain, which would be light to moderate rainfall if received over a full day or heavy rain if received over a period of 2 to 4 hours. Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi. Sea Level Rise data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The projections are from Radke et al. (2017), as reported in Cal -Adapt (2040-2059 average under RCP 8.5), and consider different increments of sea level rise coupled with extreme storm events. Users may select from four model simulations to view the range in potential inundation depth for the grid cell. The four simulations make different assumptions - - and temperature possibilities (MIR005F#t&hg%R9iiL 50 meters (m) by 50 m, or about 164 feet (ft) by 1t �t.— 40 1/16/2024 57/63 Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Wildfire data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The projections are from UC Davis, as reported in Cal -Adapt (2040-2059 average under RCP 8.5), and consider historical data of climate, vegetation, population density, and large (> 400 ha) fire history. Users may select from four model simulations to view the range in potential wildfire probabilities for the grid cell. The four simulations make different assumptions about expected rainfall and temperature are: Warmer/drier (HadGEM2-ES), Cooler/wetter (CNRM-CM5), Average conditions (CanESM2), Range of different rainfall and temperature possibilities (MIR005). Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi. 6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores Climate Hazard Exposure Score Sensitivity Score Adaptive Capacity Score Vulnerability Score Temperature and Extreme Heat 1 0 0 N/A Extreme Precipitation N/A N/A N/A N/A Sea Level Rise 1 0 0 N/A Wildfire 1 0 0 N/A Flooding N/A N/A N/A N/A Drought N/A N/A N/A N/A Snowpack Reduction N/A N/A N/A N/A Air Quality Degradation 0 0 0 N/A The sensitivity score reflects the extent to which a project would be adversely affected by exposure to a climate hazard. Exposure is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest exposure. The adaptive capacity of a project refers to its ability to manage and reduce vulnerabilities from projected climate hazards. Adaptive capacity is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest ability to adapt. The overall vulnerability scores are calculated based on the potential impacts and adaptive capacity assessments for each hazard. Scores do not include implementation of climate risk reduction measures. 6.3. Adjusted Climate Risk Scores Temperature and Extreme Heat 1 1 1 2 Extreme Precipitation N/A N/A N/A N/A Sea Level Rise 1 1 1 2 Wildfire 1 1 1 2 Flooding N/A N/A N/A N/A Drought N/A N/A N/A N/A Snowpack Reduction N/A N/A N/A N/A City Council 26 — 470 1/16/2024 58/63 Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Air Quality Degradation 1 1 1 2 The sensitivity score reflects the extent to which a project would be adversely affected by exposure to a climate hazard. Exposure is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest exposure. The adaptive capacity of a project refers to its ability to manage and reduce vulnerabilities from projected climate hazards. Adaptive capacity is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest ability to adapt. The overall vulnerability scores are calculated based on the potential impacts and adaptive capacity assessments for each hazard. Scores include implementation of climate risk reduction measures. 6.4. Climate Risk Reduction Measures 7. Health and Equity Details 7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores The maximum CalEnviroScreen score is 100. A hiah score (i Exposure Indicators AQ-Ozone AQ-PM AQ-DPM Drinking Water Lead Risk Housing Pesticides Toxic Releases Traffic Effect Indicators than 50) reflects a hiaher pollution burden compared to other census tracts in the state. 57.0 73.5 78.3 46.5 77.7 0.00 87.5 44.2 CleanUp Sites 94.8 Groundwater 0.00 Haz Waste Facilities/Generators 86.4 Impaired Water Bodies 0.00 Solid Waste FR 7 City Council 26 — 471 1/16/2024 59/63 Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Sensitive Population Asthma 55.5 Cardio-vascular 45.8 Low Birth Weights 88.0 Socioeconomic Factor Indicators — Education 97.9 Housing 88.7 Linguistic 96.9 Poverty 92.8 Unemployment 49.9 7.2. Healthy Places Index Scores The maximum Health Places Index score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects healthier community conditions compared to other census tracts in the state. Economic Above Poverty 5.41511613 Employed 49.83959964 Median HI 5.838573078 Education — Bachelor's or higher 10.61208777 High school enrollment 100 Preschool enrollment 45.81034262 Transportation — Auto Access 2.669061979 Active commuting 93.17336071 Social — 2-parent households City Council 26 — 472 1/16/2024 60/63 Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Voting 4.401385859 Neighborhood — Alcohol availability 16.27101245 Park access 35.81419222 Retail density 96.35570384 Supermarket access 94.25125112 Tree canopy 20.51841396 Housing — Homeownership 5.800076992 Housing habitability 4.516874118 Low-inc homeowner severe housing cost burden 15.57808289 Low-inc renter severe housing cost burden 43.07712049 Uncrowded housing 1.680995765 Health Outcomes — Insured adults 1.860644168 Arthritis 54.3 Asthma ER Admissions 49.4 High Blood Pressure 58.0 Cancer (excluding skin) 87.6 Asthma 14.8 Coronary Heart Disease 23.5 Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease 17.9 Diagnosed Diabetes 11.9 Life Expectancy at Birth 95.7 Cognitively Disabled 39.7 Physically Disabled 45.1 Heart Attack ER Admiccinnc 785 City Council 26 — 473 1/16/2024 61 / 63 Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 Mental Health Not Good 7.3 Chronic Kidney Disease 14.8 Obesity 19.9 Pedestrian Injuries 94.3 Physical Health Not Good 7.3 Stroke 17.3 Health Risk Behaviors — Binge Drinking 57.0 Current Smoker 9.3 No Leisure Time for Physical Activity 3.2 Climate Change Exposures — Wildfire Risk 0.0 SLR Inundation Area 0.0 Children 0.5 Elderly 69.3 English Speaking 1.3 Foreign -born 93.3 Outdoor Workers 21.6 Climate Change Adaptive Capacity — Impervious Surface Cover 11.1 Traffic Density 55.3 Traffic Access 23.0 Other Indices — Hardship 96.6 Other Decision Support — 2016 Voting 31.1 City Council 26 — 474 1/16/2024 62/63 Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 7.3. Overall Health & Equity Scores CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Score for Project Location (a) 90.0 Healthy Places Index Score for Project Location (b) 12.0 Project Located in a Designated Disadvantaged Community (Senate Bill 535) Yes Project Located in a Low -Income Community (Assembly Bill 1550) Yes Project Located in a Community Air Protection Program Community (Assembly Bill 617) No a: The maximum CalEnviroScreen score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects a higher pollution burden compared to other census tracts in the state. b: The maximum Health Places Index score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects healthier community conditions compared to other census tracts in the state. 7.4. Health & Equity Measures No Health & Equity Measures selected. 7.5. Evaluation Scorecard Health & Equity Evaluation Scorecard not completed. 7.6. Health & Equity Custom Measures No Health & Equity Custom Measures created. 8. User Changes to Default Data Construction: Construction Phases Construction: Architectural Coatings Operations: Vehicle Data As per the information provided. As per SCAQMD Rule 1113. As per VISTA HERITAGE GLOBAL ACADEMY EXPANSION TRIP GENERATION ASSESSMENT City Council 26 — 475 63/63 1 /16/2024 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 ATTACHMENT B NOISE DATA City Council 26 — 476 1/16/2024 Site Number: NM-1 Recorded By: Winnie Woo, Darshan Shivaiah Job Number: Santa Ana Vista Charter School Date: 06/28/2023 Time: 11:08 AM Location: Northeast of Romero -Cruz Academy main building, southeast of the field Source of Ambient Noise: Traffic along Fairview Street Noise Data Leq (dB) LmaX(dB) Lmin (dB) 72.4 87.7 49.9 Category Type Vendor E ui ment Model Serial No. Cert. Date Note Sound Level Meter Bruel & Kjmr 2250 3011133 06/04/2023 Microphone Bruel & Kjaer 4189 3086765 06/04/2023 Sound Pream Bruel & K'aer ZC 0032 25380 06/04/2023 Calibrator Bruel & K mr 4231 2545667 06/04/2023 Weather Data Duration: 10 minutes Sky: artly Cloud Note: dBA Offset = 0.01 Sensor Height ft : 5 ft Est. Wind Ave Speed (mph / m/s Temperature (degrees Fahrenheit Barometer Pressure inches 6 mph 69 29.91 Photo of Measurement Location City Council 26 — 477 1/16/2024 2250 Instrument: 2250 Application: BZ7225 Version 4.7.6 Start Time: 06/28/2023 11:08:36 End Time: 06/28/2023 11:18:36 Elapsed Time: 00:10:00 Bandwidth: 1/3-octave Max Input Level: 142.15 Time Frequency Broadband excl. Peak): FSI AC Broadband Peak: C Spectrum: FS Z Instrument Serial Number: 3011133 Microphone Serial Number: 3086765 Input: Top Socket Windscreen Correction: UA-1650 Sound Field Correction: Free -field Calibration Time: 06/28/2023 08:19:46 Calibration Type: External reference Sensitivity: 43.4715375304222 mV/Pa VCS_001 Start time End time Elapsed time Overload % LAeq dB LAFinax dB LAFmin dB Value 0.00 72.4 87.7 49.9 Time 11:08:36 AM 11:18:36 AM 0:10:00 Date 06/28/2023 06/28/2023 City Council 26 — 478 1/16/2024 VCS_001 % Based on LAF , 10ms Class width: 0.2 dB 06/28/2023 11:08:36 AM - 11:18:36 AM 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Level Cumulative Cursor: [78.2 ; 78.4[dB Level: 0.3% Cumulative: 4.5% L1 = 81.9 dB L5 = 78.0 dB L10 = 75.9 dB L50 = 69.1 dB L90 = 56.1 dB L95 = 54.3 dB L99 = 52.1 dB dB City Council 26 — 479 1/16/2024 VCS_001 dB 140 120 100 80 60 40 — — — — — — 20 11:09:00 AM 11:11:00 AM 11:13:00 AM 11:15:00 AM 11:17:00 AM LAleq LAFinax LCpeak LAFmin Cursor: 06/28/2023 11:13:35 AM - 11:13:36 AM LAleq=61.7 dB LAFinax=61.7 dB LCpeak=82.4 dB LAFmin=60.5 dB VCS_001 Start time Elapsed time Overload % LAleq dB LAFinax dB LAFmin dB Value 0.00 61.7 61.7 60.5 Time 11:13:35 AM 0:00:01 Date 06/28/2023 City Council 26 — 480 1/16/2024 dB 06/28/2023 11:13:35 AM - 11:13:36 AM 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 12.50 31.50 63 _ LZeq Cursor: (A) Leq=61.1 dB VGS_001 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 16000 A C Hz VCS_001 Periodic reports dB 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 11:10:00 AM 11:20:00 AM 11:30:00 AM 11:40:00 AM 11:50:00 AM 12:00:00 PM LAleq LAFinax LCpeak LAFmin Cursor: 06/28/2023 11:08:36 AM - 12:08:36 PM LAleq=74.1 dB LAFinax=87.7 dB LCpeak=107.6 dB LAFmin=49.9 dB City Council 26 — 481 1/16/2024 VCS_001 Periodic reports Start time Elapsed time Overload % LAleq dB LAFinax dB LAFmin dB Value 0.00 74.1 87.7 49.9 Time 11:08:36 AM 0:10:00 Date 06/28/2023 City Council 26 — 482 1/16/2024 V c E VCS_001 Periodic reports �RSPd nn I AF 1 nms Class width. n 9 riR na/9R/9n93 11 •nR•3R AM _ 11.1 R•3R AM I L1 = 81.9 dB L5 = 78.0 dB L10 = 75.9 dB L50 = 69.1 dB L95 = 54.3 dB L99 = 52.1 dB 1 4- I 1 4- 1 4- L- J 1 t-- I -L 1 L-1 1 L I I I 9n in 4n fin Rn 7n An an inn iin 19n 1sn 1 Level Cumulative Cursor: [78.2 ; 78.4[dB Level: 0.3% Cumulative: 4.5% dB City Council 26 — 483 1/16/2024 Site Number: NM-2 Recorded By: Winnie Woo, Darshan Shivaiah Job Number: Santa Ana Vista Charter School Date: 06/28/2023 Time: 11:26 AM Location: East of southern driveway access to Vista Heritage Global Academy Source of Ambient Noise: Traffic along 5th Street and Fairview Street Noise Data Leq (dB) Lmax(dB) Lmin (dB) 66.2 80.7 46.5 Equipment Category Type Vendor Model Serial No. Cert. Date Note Sound Level Meter Bruel & K'aar 2250 3011133 06/04/2023 Microphone Bruel & K mr 4189 3086765 06/04/2023 Sound Preamp Bruel & K'aer ZC 0032 25380 06/04/2023 Calibrator Bruel & K'aer 4231 2545667 06/04/2023 Weather Data Duration: 10 minutes Sky: Partly Cloud Note: dBA Offset = 0.01 Sensor Height (ft): 5 ft Est. Wind Ave Speed mph / m/s Temperature (degrees Fahrenheit Barometer Pressure inches 6 mph 69 29.91 Photo of Measurement Location City Council 26 — 484 1/16/2024 2250 Instrument: 2250 Application: BZ7225 Version 4.7.6 Start Time: 06/28/2023 11:26:27 End Time: 06/28/2023 11:36:27 Elapsed Time: 00:10:00 Bandwidth: 1/3-octave Max Input Level: 142.15 Time Frequency Broadband excl. Peak): FSI AC Broadband Peak: C Spectrum: FS Z Instrument Serial Number: 3011133 Microphone Serial Number: 3086765 Input: Top Socket Windscreen Correction: UA-1650 Sound Field Correction: Free -field Calibration Time: 06/28/2023 08:19:46 Calibration Type: External reference Sensitivity: 43.4715375304222 mV/Pa VCS_002 Start time End time Elapsed time Overload % LAeq dB LAFinax dB LAFmin dB Value 0.00 66.2 80.7 46.5 Time 11:26:27 AM 11:36:27 AM 0:10:00 Date 06/28/2023 06/28/2023 City Council 26 — 485 1/16/2024 vcs_002 % Based on LAF , 10ms Class width: 0.2 dB 06/28/2023 11:26:27 AM - 11:36:27 AM 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 +I I L-J I LL I -L I L L L L L L I L I L Level Cumulative Cursor: [78.2 ; 78.4[dB Level: 0.0% Cumulative: 0.2% L1 = 76.2 dB L5 = 72.6 dB L10 = 70.4 dB L50 = 61.3 dB L90 = 53.4 dB L95 = 51.1 dB L99 = 48.2 dB dB City Council 26 — 486 1/16/2024 VCS_002 dB 140 120 100 r r 80 60 � r 40 — — L — — — — — — 20 11:27:00 AM 11:29:00 AM 11:31:00 AM 11:33:00 AM 11:35:00 AM LAIeq LAFinax LCpeak LAFmin Cursor: 06/28/2023 11:31:26 AM - 11:31:27 AM LAleq=73.0 dB LAFinax=67.5 dB LCpeak=81.9 dB LAFmin=60.4 dB VCS_002 Start time Elapsed time Overload % LAleq dB LAFinax dB LAFmin dB Value 0.00 73.0 67.5 60.4 Time 11:31:26 AM 0:00:01 Date 06/28/2023 City Council 26 — 487 1/16/2024 dB 06/28/2023 11:31:26 AM - 11:31:27 AM 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 12.50 31.50 63 _ LZeq Cursor: (A) Leq=62.9 dB Vcs_002 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 16000 A C Hz VCS_002 Periodic reports dB 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 11:30:00 AM 11:40:00 AM 11:50:00 AM 12:00:00 PM 12:10:00 PM 12:20:00 PM LAIeq LAFinax LCpeak LAFmin Cursor: 06/28/2023 11:26:27 AM - 12:26:27 PM LAIeq=68.6 dB LAFinax=80.7 dB LCpeak=100.6 dB LAFmin=46.5 dB City Council 26 — 488 1/16/2024 VCS_002 Periodic reports Start time Elapsed time Overload % LAleq dB LAFinax dB LAFmin dB Value 0.00 68.6 80.7 46.5 Time 11:26:27 AM 0:10:00 Date 06/28/2023 City Council 26 — 489 1/16/2024 V c E VCS_002 Periodic reports �RSPd nn I AF 1 nms Class width. n 9 riR na/9R/9n93 11.9R•97 AM _ 11.3R•97 AM 1 4- 1 1 4II I L-J I t-- I -L I I --Ii i i i i 9n in 4n fin Fn 7n An an inn iin 19n 1sn 1 Level Cumulative Cursor: [78.2 ; 78.4[dB Level: 0.0% Cumulative: 0.2% L1 = 76.2 dB L5 = 72.6 dB L10 = 70.4 dB L50 = 61.3 dB L90 = 53.4 dB L95 = 51.1 dB L99 = 48.2 dB dB City Council 26 — 490 1/16/2024 Site Number: NM-3 Recorded By: Winnie Woo, Darshan Shivaiah Job Number: Santa Ana Vista Charter School Date: 06/28/2023 Time: 11:45 AM Location: Cul-de-sac of West 7th Street Source of Ambient Noise: Traffic along Fairview Street Noise Data Leq (dB) Lmax(dB) Lmin (0) 51.1 79.6 41.1 Equipment Category Type Vendor Model Serial No. Cert. Date Note Sound Level Meter Bruel & K'aer 2250 3011133 06/04/2023 Microphone Bruel & K'aer 4189 3086765 06/04/2023 Sound Preamp Bruel & K'aer ZC 0032 25380 06/04/2023 Calibrator Bruel & K'aer 4231 2545667 06/04/2023 Weather Data Duration: 10 minutes Sky: Partly Cloud Note: dBA Offset = 0.01 Sensor Height (ft): 5 ft Est. Wind Ave Speed mph / m/s Temperature (degrees Fahrenheit Barometer Pressure inches 6 mph 69 29.91 Photo of Measurement Location City Council 26 — 491 1/16/2024 2250 Instrument: 2250 Application: BZ7225 Version 4.7.6 Start Time: 06/28/2023 11:45:06 End Time: 06/28/2023 11:55:06 Elapsed Time: 00:10:00 Bandwidth: 1/3-octave Max Input Level: 142.15 Time Frequency Broadband excl. Peak): FSI AC Broadband Peak: C Spectrum: FS Z Instrument Serial Number: 3011133 Microphone Serial Number: 3086765 Input: Top Socket Windscreen Correction: UA-1650 Sound Field Correction: Free -field Calibration Time: 06/28/2023 08:19:46 Calibration Type: External reference Sensitivity: 43.4715375304222 mV/Pa VCS_003 Start time End time Elapsed time Overload % LAeq dB LAFinax dB LAFmin dB Value 0.00 51.1 79.6 41.1 Time 11:45:06 AM 11:55:06 AM 0:10:00 Date 06/28/2023 06/28/2023 City Council 26 — 492 1/16/2024 VCS_003 % Based on LAF , 10ms Class width: 0.2 dB 06/28/2023 11:45:06 AM - 11:55:06 AM 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 1 L 1 �I 1 4I I� �I LILLILIIL Level Cumulative Cursor: [78.2 ; 78.4[dB Level: 0.0% Cumulative: 0.0% L1 = 59.2 dB L5 = 53.7 dB L10 = 51.2 dB L50 = 45.6 dB L90 = 43.2 dB L95 = 42.7 dB L99 = 41.9 dB dB City Council 26 — 493 1/16/2024 VCS_003 dB 140 120 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 100 80 60 40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 20 11:46:00 AM 11:48:00 AM 11:50:00 AM 11:52:00 AM 11:54:00 AM LAleq LAFinax LCpeak LAFmin Cursor: 06/28/2023 11:50:05 AM - 11:50:06 AM LAleq=48.2 dB LAFinax=48.3 dB LCpeak=68.4 dB LAFmin=47.6 dB VCS_003 Start time Elapsed time Overload % LAleq dB LAFinax dB LAFmin dB Value 0.00 48.2 48.3 47.6 Time 11:50:05 AM 0:00:01 Date 06/28/2023 City Council 26 — 494 1/16/2024 dB 06/28/2023 11:50:05 AM - 11:50:06 AM 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 12.50 31.50 _ LZeq Cursor: (A) Leq=47.9 dB VGS_003 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 16000 A C Hz VCS_003 Periodic reports dB 140 120 100 + 80 60 40 20 11:50:00 AM 12:00:00 PM 12:10:00 PM 12:20:00 PM 12:30:00 PM 12:40:00 PM LAIeq LAFinax LCpeak LAFmin Cursor: 06/28/2023 11:45:06 AM - 12:45:06 PM LAIeq=58.6 dB LAFinax=79.6 dB LCpeak=90.1 dB LAFmin=41.1 dB City Council 26 — 495 1/16/2024 VCS_003 Periodic reports Start time Elapsed time Overload % LAleq dB LAFinax dB LAFmin dB Value 0.00 58.6 79.6 41.1 Time 11:45:06 AM 0:10:00 Date 06/28/2023 City Council 26 — 496 1/16/2024 V c E VCS_003 Periodic reports �RSPd nn I AF 1 nms Class width. n 9 riR nR/9A19n93 11.AS-nR AM _ 11.5.ri•nr, AM fi l + + 1 4- 1-� 1 1 4- 1 � 4- I 9n in 4n fin Fn 7n An an inn iin 19n 1sn 1 Level Cumulative Cursor: [78.2 ; 78.4[dB Level: 0.0% Cumulative: 0.0% L1 = 59.2 dB L5 = 53.7 dB L10 = 51.2 dB L50 = 45.6 dB L90 = 43.2 dB L95 = 42.7 dB L99 = 41.9 dB dB City Council 26 — 497 1/16/2024 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 ATTACHMENT C TRIP GENERATION MEMO City Council 26 — 498 1/16/2024 URBAN I CROSSROADS DATE: July 24, 2023 TO: Ingrid Canedo, Red Hook Capital Partners FROM: Jose Alire/Robert Vu, Urban Crossroads, Inc. JOB NO: 14724D-02 TG Memo VISTA HERITAGE GLOBAL ACADEMY EXPANSION TRIP GENERATION ASSESSMENT Urban Crossroads, Inc. is pleased to provide the following Trip Generation Assessment for the Vista Heritage Global Academy Expansion development (Project), which is located at 601 North Fairview Street in the City of Santa Ana. The purpose of this assessment is to describe the proposed Project trip generation and provide a comparison to the existing building zoned as Light Manufacturing (M1). EXHIBIT A: PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN Council 26 — 499 1/16/2024 Ingrid Canedo, Red Hook Capital Partners July 24, 2023 Page 2 of 3 PROPOSED PROJECT The Project site currently contains an existing 5,837 square -foot industrial building that will be converted into an administrative office building. A 12,186 SF building was demolished and redeveloped into parking spaces as part of the expansion. In addition, the applicant is proposing to improve the site with 17,497 square feet of student outdoor spaces, on -site parking, and landscaping. Vista Heritage Global Academy is not increasing the maximum number of students with this expansion. TRIP GENERATION Trip generation represents the amount of traffic which is both attracted to and produced by a development. Determining traffic generation for a specific project is therefore based upon forecasting the amount of traffic that is expected to be both attracted to and produced by the specific land uses being proposed for a given development. In order to develop the traffic characteristics of the existing land use and the proposed Project, trip -generation statistics published in the ITE Trip Generation Manual (11 th Edition) were used. EXISTING USE As noted previously, the site is designated as Light Manufacturing (M1) and is currently developed with a 5,837 square foot industrial building on -site. The trip generation for the existing use is summarized in Table 1. As shown in Table 1, the existing industrial building generates a total of 28 two-way trips per day with 4 AM peak hour trips and 4 PM peak hour trips. Land Use Manufacturing Land Use Manufacturing TABLE 1: EXISTING USE TRIP GENERATION ITE z AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Units Daily LU Code In Out Total In Out Total 140 TSF 0.52 0.16 0.68 0.23 0.51 0.74 4.75 AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Daily Quantity UnitS2 In Out Total In Out Total 5.837 TSF 3 1 4 1 3 4 28 Trip Generation Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Trip Generation Manual, Eleventh Edition. Z TSF = thousand square feet PROPOSED PROJECT The proposed Project includes the redevelopment of the existing building into a 5,764 school district office building. The trip generation summary illustrating daily, and peak hour trip generation estimates for the proposed Project are also summarized in Table 2. The proposed Project is anticipated to generate 84 two-way trips per day with 14 AM peak hour trips and 12 PM peak hour trips. V ur�r—�OSSROADS 26 — 500 141kA1Aq?4Aerno Ingrid Canedo, Red Hook Capital Partners July 24, 2023 Page 3 of 3 TABLE 2: PROPOSED PROJECT TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY ITE Z AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Units Daily Land Use LU Code In Out Total In Out Total School District Office 528 TSF 1.18 1.18 2.36 1.02 1.02 2.04 14.37 AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Daily Land Use Quantity UnitS2 In Out Total In Out Total School District Office 5.837 TSF 7 7 14 6 6 12 84 Trip Generation Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Trip Generation Manual, Eleventh Edition. Z TSF = thousand square feet TRIP GENERATION COMPARISON Table 3 compares the trip generation of the proposed Project to the existing use (currently adopted). The resulting net change in trips is also identified in Table 3 and has been calculated by subtracting the existing use from the proposed Project. As shown, the Project is anticipated to generate a net increase of 56 two-way trips per day, 10 more AM peak hour trips, and 8 more PM peak hour trips as compared to the existing use. TABLE 3: TRIP GENERATION COMPARISON AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Land Use In Out Total In Out Total Daily Existing Use 3 1 4 1 3 4 28 Proposed Project 7 7 14 6 6 12 84 Net Change (Proposed - Existing) 4 6 10 5 3 8 56 FINDINGS The development of the proposed Project (school district office) is anticipated to generate more trips than the existing (currently approved) industrial use. The net increase in trip generation and total trips generated are below 50 peak hour trips. As such, additional traffic analysis beyond this trip generation assessment does not appear to be necessary as the effects on transportation operations (level of service) are not significant. If you have any questions or comments, I can be reached at rvu@urbanxroads.com. Respectfully submitted, URBAN CROSSROADS, INC. 1 Jose Alire, P.E. Senior Traffic Engineer Robert Vu, P.E. Transportation Engineer V ur�r—�OSSROADS 26 — 501 141kA1Aq?4Aerno Exhibit 8 - Community Meeting Documents M �' kx uan FY .` E kd March 10, 2023 Ms. Fernanda Arias Santa Ana Planning Division 20 Civic Center Plaza, M-20 Santa Ana, CA. 92702 RE: Submittal of March 6, 2023, Sunshine Meeting documents —Vista Charter Public Schools Dear Ms. Arias, On behalf of Vista Charter Public Schools and Red Hook Capital Partners, please find the enclosed materials required by the Sunshine Ordinance for the March 6, 2023 meeting for the Vista Charter Public Schools proposed zone change (amendment application) and amendments to the SD-82 zoning district at 601 N. Fairview Street. The following material are provided for your use: 1. Community meeting notice (English and Spanish) 2. List of property owners within 1000 feet of the site 3. List of occupants within 1000 feet of the site 4. The 1000-foot notification radius map 5. Proof of publication in the local newspaper 6. Meeting agenda 7. Sign -in sheet 8. Copy of the PowerPoint presentation for the meeting 9. Meeting minutes/Questions and answers This letter confirms, under penalty of perjury, that the required meeting, notifications and materials were prepared and distributed in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance of the City of Santa Ana. Respectfully, vullL_�_1 C! Vince Fregoso The Fregoso Group On behalf of Vista Charter Public Schools City Council 26 — 502 1/16/2024 SUNSHINE ORDINANCE COMMUNITY MEETING NOTICE You are invited to attend a Community Meeting for the project described below: Subject: Amend the zoning of the northwest parcel from industrial to Specific Development No. 82 (SD-82) to be consistent with the majority of the parcel and to amend the Operational Standards of the SD-82 zoning to allow outdoor recreation areas. Spanish language translators will be available during the meeting. Location: 2609 West Fifth Street (Vista Heritage Bay 3 Cafeteria) Meeting Date: Monday, March 6, 2023 Meeting Time: 5:30 pm to 6:30 pm Meeting Location: Vista Heritage Bay 3 Cafeteria 2609 West Fifth Street Notification A Project Site: Meeting Site: For more information, contact Vince Fregoso at 714-904-4506 or Ingrid Canedo at 818-309-3664 City Council 26 — 503 1/16/2024 SUNSHINE ORDINANCE AVISO DE REUNION COMUNITARIA Esta invitado en asistir a una reunion comunitaria al trato del proyecto de desarrollo descrito en adelante: Prop6sito: Enmendar la zonificaci6n industrial de la propiedad ubicada en la parte noroeste de la escuela. El emendar la zonificaci6n Nu. 82 (SD-82) para que coincida con la parte mayoria del terreno junto, que viene siendo la escuela. La modificaci6n tambien agregara terminos generales a la zona SD-82 para incluir actividades fisicas al aire libre. Traductores en lenguaje espanol estardn presentes durante la reuni6n. Ubicaci6n: 2609 West Fifth Street (la cafeteria de bay 3 de Vista Heritage School) Fecha de reuni6n: Lunes, 6 de Marzo de 2023 Hora de reuni6n: 5:30 p. m. a 6:30 p. m. Lugar de reuni6n: La cafeteria de bay 3 de Vista Heritage School 2609 West Fifth Street Notification A Project Site: Meeting Site: Para m6s informaci6n, comuniquese con Vince Fregoso al 714-904-4506 o Ingrid Canedo al 818-309-3664 City Council 26 — 504 1/16/2024 #1 !, 004-152-01 !US MAPS 4 LESS ARMANDO & JOSEFINA E ESPARZA 2222 W 10TH ST �v�vr�.ratJirisntaps4less.cai�t ( (909) 997-9357 SANTA ANA CA 92703 ORDER NO: 2023-26 DATE:02109/2023 #3 004-152-10 HOLDINGS SORENTO 2209 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #6 004-152-13 ESTHER AVALOS MAFFEY 2225 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #9 004-153-02 ESTELA LORA GUERRERO 2230 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #12 004-153-05 REBECCA P CAMPOS 2218 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #15 004-153-08 LONG TRAN 2206 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #18 004-153-11 RODOLFO & STELLA LICERIO 2141 W CIVIC CENTER DR SANTA ANA CA 92703 #21 004-153-14 IGNACIO D GONZALES 2205 CIVIC CENTER DR WEST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #24 004-153-18 MASTAN INC 811 N FAIRVIEW ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #27 004-183-02 CARLOS H PEREGRINA 2130 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #4 004-152-11 HOLLY NHIHA LE 2217 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #7 004-152-14 CANDIDA G OLIVAS 2229 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #10 004-153-03 STEVEN HUU & TAMMY CHANH NGUYEN 6945 ALTAIR CT CORONA CA 92880 #13 004-153-06 TEODULO MONTIEL ADAME 2214 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #16 004-153-09 DANIEL PEREZ & JILL E AVILA 2202 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #19 004-153-12 NGOC TRAN 2145 W CIVIC CENTER DR SANTA ANA CA 92703 #22 004-153-16 SOUTHLAND HOMES REAL ESTATE & INVESTMENT 10448 SALINAS RIVER CIR FOUNTAIN VALLEY CA 92708 #25 004-153-20 EDELIRA MORENO 2209 W CIVIC CENTER DR SANTA ANA CA 92703 #28 004-183-03 VICTORIA FLORES RODRIGUEZ 2126 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #2 004-152-09 HOLDINGS SORENTO 2209 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #5 004-152-12 ERIC R LOPEZ 2221 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #8 004-153-01 WINSTON HUYNH 2234 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #11 004-153-04 DIOSFORO & MARIA E SERNA 2222 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #14 004-153-07 ANTONIO RODRIGUEZTRUJILLO 2210 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #17 004-153-10 RICARDO H & ANA L HARO 2137 CIVIC CENTER DR WEST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #20 004-153-13 ANDY 0 MUNOZ 2019 VALENCIA ST SANTA ANA CA 92706 #23 004-153-17 JUAN 0 & CAROLYN E MEDRANO 2221 W CIVIC CENTER DR SANTA ANA CA 92703 #26 004-183-01 SERG10 MORE NO JUAREZ 2134 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #29 004-183-15 ANDREW JONATHAN & DIANA ROSE MUNOZ 2129 W CIVIC CENTER DR SANTA ANA CA 92703 City Council 26 — 505 1/16/2024 #30 #31 #32 004-183-16 004-183-17 004-183-22 DAVID NGUYEN MICHAEL B MATTINGLEY HERIBERTO & MARIA MERCADO 3361 RURAL CIR 4006 CALLE MARLENA 2121 CIVIC CENTER DR CORONA CA 92882 SAN CLEMENTE CA 92672 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #33 #34 #35 004-183-24 007-021-02 007-021-03 REYNALDO & ZOILA VERGARA TUAN HOANG NGUYEN ARTURO F DURAZO 2125 CIVIC CTR 7662 LEHIEN PL 2321 6TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 WESTMINSTER CA 92683 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #36 #37 #38 007-021-04 007-021-05 007-021-06 NESTOR ALEJANDRES GEORGE B COBARRUVIA EUGENE JONES 2317 6TH ST 2309 6TH ST 12921 ROSALIND DR SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92705 #39 #40 #41 007-021-08 007-021-10 007-021-14 JOSE & YOLANDA ZAVALA TUNG DINH PHAN 1PACIFIC INTERNATIONAL TR6TH SA GARDENS 2339 6TH ST 14822 ALCESTER ST 13043 BACH WAY SANTA ANA CA 92703 WESTMINSTER CA 92683 CERRITOS CA 90703 #42 #43 #44 007-022-01 007-022-04 007-022-05 FOR THE SOUL LLC HOMES MICHAEL A MADZOEFF MICHAEL A MADZOEFF 1616 FLOWER AVE 211 MARIGOLD AVE 211 MARIGOLD AVE FULLERTON CA 92833 CORONA DEL MAR CA 92625 CORONA DEL MAR CA 92625 #45 #46 #47 007-022-06 007-022-07 007-022-09 MICHAEL A MADZOEFF MICHAEL A MADZOEFF JAKE J YOON 211 MARIGOLD AVE 211 MARIGOLD AVE 2301 5TH ST CORONA DEL MAR CA 92625 CORONA DEL MAR CA 92625 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #48 #49 #50 007-022-13 007-022-16 007-022-17 INDELISA QUINTERO MICHAEL A MADZOEFF MICHAEL A MADZOEFF 2424 6TH ST 211 MARIGOLD AVE 211 MARIGOLD AVE SANTA ANA CA 92703 CORONA DEL MAR CA 92625 CORONA DEL MAR CA 92625 #51 #52 #53 007-022-19 007-022-20 007-022-21 JAKE J YOON FRANCISCO JAVIER PERAZA LA RIVA ROSIE V DE 2301 5TH ST 2414 6TH ST 2418 6TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #54 #55 #56 007-022-23 007-022-24 007-022-25 AVA ENTERPRISES MICHAEL A MADZOEFF MICHAEL A MADZOEFF 2831 1ST ST 211 MARIGOLD AVE 211 MARIGOLD AVE SANTA ANA CA 92703 CORONA DEL MAR CA 92625 CORONA DEL MAR CA 92625 #57 #58 #59 007-022-26 007-022-29 007-022-30 ORANGE COUNTY TRANSIT RICK D KAGASOFF JAKE J YOON PO BOX 14184 2023 HELIOTROPE 2301 5TH ST ORANGE CA 92863 SANTA ANA CA 92706 SANTA ANA CA 92703 City Council 26 — 506 1/16/2024 #60 #61 #62 007-022-31 007-022-32 007-022-33 MICHAEL A MAD ZOEFF JAKE J YOON MICHAEL A MAD ZOEFF 211 MARIGOLD AVE 2301 5TH ST 211 MARIGOLD AVE CORONA DEL MAR CA 92625 SANTA ANA CA 92703 CORONA DEL MAR CA 92625 #63 #64 #65 007-110-01 007-120-24 007-120-25 KEVIN OVERGAAUW RICK D KAGASOFF T R KIRWAN 2308 5TH ST 2023 HELIOTROPE 5133 LORELEI AVE SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92706 LAKEWOOD CA 90712 #66 #67 #68 007-120-26 007-120-27 007-120-28 JOSE LUIS CHOCOTECO CHARLES A HATFIELD CHUNG-YEN & YEN -LING HUANG 1002 ROSITA ST 25852 PECOS RD 18819 MT SCHELIN CIR SANTA ANA CA 92703 LAGUNA HILLS CA 92653 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CA 92708 #69 #70 #71 007-120-43 007-120-44 007-120-46 KELLY E CHAPMAN KELLY E CHAPMAN DION C CHAPMAN 24242 SANTA CLARA AVE 11 24242 SANTA CLARA AVE 11 30442 BENECIA DANA POINT CA 92629 DANA POINT CA 92629 LAGUNA NIGUEL CA 92677 #72 #73 #74 007-120-48 007-121-01 007-121-02 ORANGE COUNTY TRANSIT RICK D KAGASOFF FIFTH STREET CAPITAL WEST P O BOX 3005 2023 HELIOTROPE 55 FANLIGHT GARDEN GROVE CA 92840 SANTA ANA CA 92705 IRVINE CA 92620 #75 #76 #77 007-121-03 007-121-04 007-121-05 MARANATHA REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS LLC HBBF RICK D KAGASOFF 411 SULLIVAN ST 410 NANTUCKET PL 2023 HELIOTROPE DR SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92706 #78 #79 #80 007-121-06 007-121-07 007-121-08 RICK D KAGASOFF CYMC LLC CYMC LLC 2023 HELIOTROPE 321 SULLIVAN ST 301 SULLIVAN ST SANTA ANA CA 92705 SANTA ANA CA SANTA ANA CA 92703 #81 #82 #83 007-121-09 007-121-10 007-141-04 CYMC LLC RICK D KAGASOFF CHRIS R SOLDAN 2430 CAPE COD WAY 2023 HELIOTROPE DR 7243 CAMBRIA CIR SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92706 ORANGE CA 92869 #84 #85 #86 007-141-11 007-141-24 007-141-26 SPACE PROPERTIES TWO LLC EXTRA PHUC VIETTRAN RICK D KAGASOFF 2795 COTTONWOOD PKWY #400 126 MAXINE ST 2023 HELIOTROPE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84121 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92706 #87 #88 #89 007-141-29 007-141-31 007-141-35 W& M PROPERTIES W& M PROPERTIES F C B PROPERTIES 1479 MUSTANG AVE 1479 MUSTANG AVE 6138 JAMES ALAN ST ORANGE CA 92869 ORANGE CA 92869 CYPRESS CA 90630 City Council 26 — 507 1/16/2024 #90 #91 #92 007-141-42 007-141-66 007-141-67 CHRIS R SOLDAN MAS LLC YIA ANA MINI STORAGE SANTA 7243 CAMBRIA CIR 16741 GLENHAVEN LN 5901 ENCINA RD C-5 ORANGE CA 92869 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 GOLETA CA 93117 #93 #94 #95 007-141-76 007-141-77 007-142-01 CHRIS R SOLDAN W & M PROPERTIES GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF ORANGE COUNTY 7243 CAMBRIA CIR 1479 MUSTANG AVE CA ORANGE CA 92869 ORANGE CA 92869 410 FAIRVIEW ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #96 #97 #98 007-351-01 007-351-02 007-351-03 MOHAMMAD ARAFEEN QUERASHI MOHAMMAD ARAFEEN QUERASHI MARIA FLORES 6633 PASEO FIESTA DR 6633 PASEO FIESTA DR 2230 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE WEST ANAHEIM HILLS CA 92703 ANAHEIM HILLS CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92701 #99 #100 #101 007-351-04 007-351-05 007-351-06 JOHN A MONREAL KENNY QUYEN LIEU EZEQUIEL SEGURA 2226 CIVIC CENTER DR WEST 2222 CIVIC CENTER DR 2218 CIVIC CENTER DR SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #102 #103 #104 007-351-07 007-351-08 007-351-09 RODRIGO SANTIAGO PACHECO REYMUNDO & EVA M DOMINGUEZ JOSE PATINO 2214 CIVIC CENTER DR 2210 CIVIC CENTER DR WEST 2206 CIVIC CENTER DR SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #105 #106 #107 007-351-10 007-351-11 007-351-14 NHUT NGOC NGUYEN RAYMOND M ZAMORA NOE & MIREYA VARGAS 801 COURTNEY 2148 CIVIC CENTER DR WEST 2136 CIVIC CENTER DR FULLERTON CA 92833 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #108 #109 #110 007-351-15 007-351-16 007-351-19 ANDRES FLORES VI NA PROPERTIES FAUSTO MACHADO 2132 CIVIC CTR 7241 WESTMINSTER BLVD 2116 CIVIC CENTER DR WEST SANTA ANA CA 92703 WESTMINSTER CA 92683 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #111 #112 #113 007-351-24 007-351-26 007-351-28 VENA & JULIE F SCANLAN EPIFANIO GONZALEZ ALEJANDRO GAVINA 2144 CIVIC CENTER DR 2140 CIVIC DR 2124 CIVIC CENTER DR SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #114 #115 #116 007-351-30 007-351-32 007-352-02 CONSTANTINO SALINAS RODRIGUEZ JOSE D ORTIZ CHRISTOPHER A OVIEDO 2120 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE WEST 2112 CIVIC CENTER DR 2105 7TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #117 #118 #119 007-352-03 007-352-04 007-352-05 ESTEVAN N RAMIREZ ROGELIO SILVA LUIS MELCHOR PENALOZA 2110 7TH ST 2113 7TH ST 2117 7TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 City Council 26 — 508 1/16/2024 #120 #121 #122 007-352-06 007-352-07 007-352-08 JARELY MELCHOR HUAN NGUYEN RAUL LOPEZ 2121 7TH ST 2125 7TH ST 2129 7TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #123 #124 #125 007-352-09 007-352-10 007-352-11 YANLING SUN JAIME MUNOZ SIMONA M PERALES 2133 7TH ST 1730 WASHINGTON 2201 7TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92706 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #126 #127 #129 007-352-12 007-352-13 007-352-14 ROMAN ANTHONY REYNA JOANNA L PETERSON HECTOR MELENDEZ 2205 7TH ST 2533 HESPERIAN ST 2213 7TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92706 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #129 #130 #131 007-352-15 007-352-16 007-352-17 SERGIO GASCA MANRIQUEZ MACXIMILLIANO P CEBALLOS ELVA MENDEZ 2217 7TH ST 2221 17TH ST 2225 7TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #132 4133 #134 007-352-18 007-352-19 007-352-20 FERNANDO RODRIGUEZ CHAVEZ VICTOR MANUEL PEREZ JOSE V VALDEZ 2229 7TH ST 2233 7TH ST 2237 7TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #135 #136 #137 007-352-23 007-352-24 007-352-25 THACH JADE HOANG CHUONG MAI JUAN DIAZ 2242 7TH ST 2238 7TH ST 2234 7TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #138 #139 #140 007-352-26 007-352-27 007-352-28 ROBERT ANTHONY FLORES CATHY L BUENDIA RACHEL CAMACHO 2230 7TH ST 2226 7TH ST 1242 CEDAR SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92707 #141 #142 #143 007-352-29 007-352-30 007-352-31 CATALINA & JOSE A ANDRADE JOHNNY C NGUYEN ESTHER C GONZALEZ 2218 7TH ST 2214 7TH ST 2210 7TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #144 #145 #146 007-352-32 007-352-33 007-352-34 KHIET DO MARGARITA CORTES LILIANA FAUSTO 2206 7TH ST 2202 7TH ST 2138 7TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #147 #148 #149 007-352-35 007-352-36 007-352-37 BRAD & WENDY PEIKERT BRAD & WENDY PEIKERT ENRIQUE PENA 2130 7TH ST 2130 7TH ST 2126 7TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 City Council 26 — 509 1/16/2024 #150 #151 #1S2 007-352-38 007-352-39 007-352-40 ISRAEL VERGARA ALVAREZ ISRAEL & ELEAZER MONTES VERGARA AGUSTIN & MARICELA ANAYA 2122 7TH ST 2118 7TH ST 2114 7TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #153 007-352-41 ESTEVAN N RAMIREZ 2110 7TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #156 198-151-35 KIM EAR WONG 12636 CASA BONITA PL VICTORVILLE CA 92392 #159 405-211-03 SCHOOL SANTA ANA UNIFIEDDISTRICT 1601 CHESTNUT AVE SANTA ANA CA 92701 #162 405-211-08 ROSA MENDIVIL 1424 LOWELL ST SANTA ANA CA 92706 #165 405-211-11 LUIS B & MARIA D L RODRIGUEZ 2520 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #168 405-211-14 DANH C NGUYEN 2606 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #171 405-211-17 ALFREDA & PABLO JUAREZ 2618 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #174 405-211-20 BERTRAM F RUDOLPH P 0 BOX 2302 CARMEL CA 93921 4177 405-211-36 SCHOOL SANTA ANA UNIFIEDDISTRICT 1405 FRENCH ST SANTA ANA CA 92701 #154 007-352-42 EDNA L MEJIA 1238 BAKER ST SANTA ANA CA 92707 #157 405-211-01 SCHOOL SANTA ANA UNIFIEDDISTRICT 1405 FRENCH ST SANTA ANA CA 92701 #160 405-211-04 SCHOOL SANTA ANA UNIFIEDDISTRICT 1405 FRENCH ST SANTA ANA CA 92701 #163 405-211-09 THAI JENNIFER LOAN 9350 BOLSA AVE SPC 58 WESTMINSTER CA 92683 #166 405-211-12 JUAN JUAREZ HERNANDEZ 2528 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #169 405-211-15 MAIRA & NOEL ISRAEL AYALA 1718 TURQUOISE DR CORONA CA 92882 #172 405-211-18 NGUYEN VIETCAO 16576 MT TODD ST FOUNTAIN VALLEY CA 92708 #175 405-211-22 TAI VAN LAM 11460 VIA PLAYA CORTES WAY SAN DIEGO CA 92124 #178 405-212-01 MY TRAN DUE LUU 9509 PRICHARD ST BELLFLOWER CA 90706 #155 007-352-46 MOHAMMAD ARAFEEN QUERASHI 6633 PASEO FIESTA DR ANAHEIM HILLS CA 92703 #158 405-211-02 SCHOOL SANTA ANA UNIFIEDDISTRICT 1405 FRENCH ST SANTA ANA CA 92701 #161 405-211-07 GERALD L HIGDON 12692 BONITA HEIGHTS DR SANTA ANA CA 92705 #164 405-211-10 ORVILLE N ROSEBEARY 16461 VENUS DR WESTMINSTER CA 92683 #167 405-211-13 FELIX CIBRIAN 2534 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #170 405-211-16 IRMA OROZCO 11858 MAYFLOWER CIR FOUNTAIN VALLEY CA 92708 #173 405-211-19 RODOLFO MUNOZ 2624 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #176 405-211-23 SOUTHLAND HOMES REAL 10448 SALINAS RIVER CI FOUNTAIN VALLEY CA 92708 #179 405-212-02 GUADALUPE OLEA 933 FAIR WAY SANTA ANA CA 92703 City Council 26 — 510 1/16/2024 #180 #181 405-212-09 405-212-10 MARCELINO & EUSTOLIAJUAREZ TENTH DO 924 MARENGO PL 422 MAXINE ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92704 #183 #184 405-213-01 405-213-02 DENISE LE DENISE LE 1002 FAIRVIEW ST 1002 FAIRVIEW ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #186 #187 405-213-05 405-213-06 CUAUHTEMOC FERNANDEZ RAYMOND C C YANG 25219TH ST 2628 DEEGAN DR SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92704 #189 #190 405-213-14 405-221-01 OF SANTA ANA CITY SCHOOL SANTA ANA UNIFIEDDIST OF ORANGE 20 CIVIC CENTER PLAZA M-30 1405 FRENCH ST SANTA ANA CA 92701 SANTA ANA CA 92701 #192 #193 405-221-03 405-221-05 SCHOOL SANTA ANA UNIFIEDDIST OF ORANGE ORANGE COUNTY TRANSIT 1405 FRENCH ST P 0 BOX 3005 SANTA ANA CA 92701 GARDEN GROVE CA 92840 #195 405-241-01 PARCEL HOLD #198 405-241-03 KITCHENS QOZB FAIRVIEW 402 OCEAN VIEW AVE ENCINITAS CA 92024 #201 939-45-057 CALVARIO TEMPLO 25015TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 4204 939-45-059 CALVARIO TEMPLO 2501 5TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #207 939-45-060 2609 W 5TH STREET 2900 TEMPLE ST LOS ANGELES CA 90026 #196 405-241-01 PARCEL HOLD #199 405-241-04 2609 W 5TH STREET 2900 TEMPLE ST LOS ANGELES CA 90026 #202 939-45-058 CALVARIO TEMPLO 25015TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #205 939-45-059 CALVARIO TEMPLO 2501 5TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #208 939-45-061 2609 W 5TH STREET 2900 TEMPLE ST LOS ANGELES CA 90026 #182 405-212-11 MANUEL GARCIA RIZO 2607 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #185 405-213-04 JORGE G FRUTOS 2517 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #188 405-213-07 DIANA MELINA VALENZUELA PEREZ 927 MARENGO PL SANTA ANA CA 92703 #191 405-221-02 SCHOOL SANTA ANA UNIFIEDDIST OF ORANGE 1405 FRENCH ST SANTA ANA CA 92701 #194 405-221-07 SCHOOL SANTA ANA UNIFIEDDIST OF ORANGE 1405 FRENCH ST SANTA ANA CA 92701 #197 405-241-02 ORANGE COUNTY TRANSIT P 0 BOX 3005 GARDEN GROVE CA 92840 #200 939-45-057 CALVARIO TEMPLO 2501 5TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #203 939-45-058 CALVARIO TEMPLO 2501 5TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #206 939-45-060 2609 W 5TH STREET 2900 TEMPLE ST LOS ANGELES CA 90026 #209 939-45-061 2609 W 5TH STREET 2900 TEMPLE ST LOS ANGELES CA 90026 City Council 26 — 511 1/16/2024 #210 #211 #212 939-45-062 939-45-062 939-45-063 2609 W 5TH STREET 2609 W 5TH STREET GENERATION TILE & MARBLE NEW 2900 TEMPLE ST 2900 TEMPLE ST 563 FAIRVIEW ST LOS ANGELES CA 90026 LOS ANGELES CA 90026 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #213 #214 #215 939-45-063 939-45-064 939-45-064 GENERATION TILE & MARBLE NEW WILBERT MARRUFO WILBERT MARRUFO 563 FAIRVIEW ST 559 FAIRVIEW ST 559 FAIRVIEW ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #216 #217 #218 939-45-065 939-45-065 939-45-066 WILBERT MARRUFO WILBERT MARRUFO DHANANJAYA N MHASKAR 555 FAIRVIEW ST 555 FAIRVIEW ST 3972 BARRANCA PKWY J158 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 IRVINE CA 92606 #219 #220 #221 939-45-066 939-45-067 939-45-067 DHANANJAYA N MHASKAR SCOTTY LEE SCOTTY LEE 3972 BARRANCA PKWY J158 13791 DIEPPE CIR 13791 DIEPPE CIR IRVINE CA 92606 GARDEN GROVE CA 92843 GARDEN GROVE CA 92843 #222 #223 #224 939-45-068 939-45-068 939-45-069 CURTIS & BETTY TOM CURTIS & BETTY TOM EN HONG & JANG LAN SHEN 24982 LUNA BONITA DR 24982 LUNA BONITA DR 3314 MEADOWRIDGE LAGUNA HILLS CA 92653 LAGUNA HILLS CA 92653 ORANGE CA 92867 #225 #226 #227 939-45-069 939-45-070 939-45-070 EN HONG & JANG LAN SHEN EDWARD DONLEY EDWARD DONLEY 3314 MEADOWRIDGE 19432 CLOVER 19432 CLOVER ORANGE CA 92867 SANTA ANA CA 92705 SANTA ANA CA 92705 #228 #229 #230 939-45-071 939-45-071 939-45-072 BARRYJ EINCK BARRYJ EINCK ROBERTC HUNT 14681 DANBERRY CIR 14681 DANBERRY CIR 28371 MODJESKA CANYON RD TUSTIN CA 92780 TUSTIN CA 92780 MODJESKA CA 92676 #231 #232 #233 939-45-072 939-45-073 939-45-073 ROBERT C HUNT TAI TAN PHAM TAI TAN PHAM 28371 MODJESKA CANYON RD 302 TULIP TREE AVE 302 TULIP TREE AVE MODJESKA CA 92676 ORANGE CA 92865 ORANGE CA 92865 #234 939-45-074 HANH BICH HOANG 16572 GRAHAM PL HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 #235 939-45-074 HANH BICH HOANG 16572 GRAHAM PL HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 City Council 26 — 512 1/16/2024 #1 #2 #3 004-152-01 004-152-09 004-152-10 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2222 W 10TH ST 2209 W 9TH ST 2213 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #4 #5 #6 004-152-11 004-152-12 004-152-13 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2217 W 9TH ST 2221 W 9TH ST 2225 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #7 #8 #9 004-152-14 004-153-01 004-153-02 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2229 W 9TH ST 2234 W 9TH ST 2230 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #10 #11 #12 004-153-03 004-153-04 004-153-05 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2226 W 9TH ST 2222 W 9TH ST 2218 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #13 #14 #15 004-153-06 004-153-07 004-153-08 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2214 W 9TH ST 2210 W 9TH ST 2206 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #16 #17 #18 004-153-09 004-153-10 004-153-11 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2202 W 9TH ST 2137 W CIVIC CENTER DR 2141 W CIVIC CENTER DR SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #19 #20 #21 004-153-12 004-153-13 004-153-14 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2145 W CIVIC CENTER DR 2201 W CIVIC CENTER DR 2205 W CIVIC CENTER DR SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #22 #23 #24 004-153-16 004-153-17 004-153-18 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2217 W CIVIC CENTER DR 2221 W CIVIC CENTER DR 809 N FAIRVIEW ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #24 #24 #24 004-153-18 004-153-18 004-153-18 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 811 N FAIRVIEW ST 813 N FAIRVIEW ST 815 N FAIRVIEW ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #25 #26 #27 004-153-20 004-183-01 004-183-02 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2209 W CIVIC CENTER DR 2134 W 9TH ST 2130 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 City Council 26 — 513 1/16/2024 #28 #29 #30 004-183-03 004-193-15 004-183-16 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2126 W 9TH ST 2129 W CIVIC CENTER DR 2133 W CIVIC CENTER DR SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #31 #32 #33 004-183-17 004-183-22 004-183-24 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2119 W CIVIC CENTER OR 2121 W CIVIC CENTER DR 2125 W CIVIC CENTER DR SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #34 #35 #36 007-021-02 007-021-03 007-021-04 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2325 W 6TH ST 2321 W 6TH ST 2317 W 6TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #37 #38 #39 007-021-05 007-021-06 007-021-08 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2309 W 6TH ST 2307 W 6TH ST 2339 W 6TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #40 #41 #42 007-021-10 007-021-14 007-022-01 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2331 W 6TH ST 2333 W 6TH ST 2430 W 6TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #43 #44 #45 007-022-04 007-022-05 007-022-06 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2334 W 6TH ST 2328 W 6TH ST 2324 W 6TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #46 #47 #48 007-022-07 007-022-09 007-022-13 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2318 W 6TH ST 2304 W 6TH ST 2424 W 6TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #49 #50 #51 007-022-16 007-022-17 007-022-19 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2325 W 5TH ST 2317 W 5TH ST 2310 W 6TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #52 #53 #54 007-022-20 007-022-21 007-022-23 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2414 W 6TH ST 2418 W 6TH ST 2338 W 6TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #55 #56 #57 007-022-24 007-022-25 007-022-26 NO CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT NO CURRENT OCCUPANT 2329 W 5TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 City Council 26 — 514 1/16/2024 #58 #59 #60 007-022-29 007-022-30 007-022-31 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2415 W 5TH ST 2301 W 5TH ST 2314 W 6TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #61 #62 #63 007-022-32 007-022-33 007-110-01 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2301 W 5TH ST 2315 W 5TH ST 2308 W 5TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #64 #65 #66 007-120-24 007-120-25 007-120-26 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2400 W 5TH ST 2401 CAPE COD WAY Al2 2350 W 5TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #67 #68 #69 007-120-27 007-120-28 007-120-43 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2351 CAPE COD WAY 2330 W 5TH ST 2341 CAPE COD WAY SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #70 #71 #72 007-120-44 007-120-46 007-120-48 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT NO CURRENT OCCUPANT 2331 CAPE COD WAY 2321 CAPE COD WAY SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #73 #74 #75 007-121-01 007-121-02 007-121-03 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2430 W 5TH ST 2410 W 5TH ST 411 N SULLIVAN ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #76 #77 #78 007-121-04 007-121-05 007-121-06 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 410 NANTUCKET PL 401 N SULLIVAN ST 400 NANTUCKET PL SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #79 #80 #81 007-121-07 007-121-08 007-121-09 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 321 N SULLIVAN ST 301 N SULLIVAN ST 2430 CAPE COD WAY SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #82 #83 #84 007-121-10 007-141-04 007-141-11 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2420 CAPE COD WAY 302 N SULLIVAN ST 2602 W 5TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #85 #86 #87 007-141-24 007-141-26 007-141-29 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2520 W 5TH ST 2518 W 5TH ST 408 N SULLIVAN ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 City Council 26 — 515 1/16/2024 #88 #89 #90 007-141-31 007-141-35 007-141-42 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 406 N SULLIVAN ST 412 N SULLIVAN ST 402 N SULLIVAN ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #91 #92 #93 007-141-66 007-141-67 007-141-76 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 419 N FAIRVIEW ST 401 N FAIRVIEW ST 308 N SULLIVAN ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #94 #95 #96 007-141-77 007-142-01 007-351-01 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 404 N SULLIVAN ST 404 N FAIRVIEW ST 711 N FAIRVIEW ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #97 #98 #99 007-351-02 007-351-03 007-351-04 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 711 N FAIRVIEW ST 2230 W CIVIC CENTER DR 2226 W CIVIC CENTER DR SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #100 #101 #102 007-351-05 007-351-06 007-351-07 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2222 W CIVIC CENTER DR 2218 W CIVIC CENTER DR 2214 W CIVIC CENTER DR SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #103 #104 #105 007-351-08 007-351-09 007-351-10 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2210 W CIVIC CENTER DR 2206 W CIVIC CENTER DR 2202 W CIVIC CENTER DR SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #106 #107 #108 007-351-11 007-351-14 007-351-15 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2148 W CIVIC CENTER DR 2136 W CIVIC CENTER DR 2132 W CIVIC CENTER DR SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #109 #110 #111 007-351-16 007-351-19 007-351-24 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2128 W CIVIC CENTER DR 2116 W CIVIC CENTER DR 2144 W CIVIC CENTER DR SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #112 #113 #114 007-351-26 007-351-28 007-351-30 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2140 W CIVIC CENTER DR 2124 W CIVIC CENTER DR 2120 W CIVIC CENTER DR SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #115 #116 #117 007-351-32 007-352-02 007-352-03 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2112 W CIVIC CENTER DR 2105 W 7TH ST 2109 W 7TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 City Council 26 — 516 1/16/2024 #118 #119 #120 007-352-04 007-352-05 007-352-06 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2113 W 7TH ST 2117 W 7TH ST 2121 W 7TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #121 #122 #123 007-352-07 007-352-08 007-352-09 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2125 W 7TH ST 2129 W 7TH ST 2133 W 7TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #124 #125 #126 007-352-10 007-352-11 007-352-12 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2137 W 7TH ST 2201 W 7TH ST 2205 W 7TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #127 #128 #129 007-352-13 007-352-14 007-352-15 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2209 W 7TH ST 2213 W 7TH ST 2217 W 7TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #130 4131 #132 007-352-16 007-352-17 007-352-18 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2221 W 7TH ST 2225 W 7TH ST 2229 W 7TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #133 #134 #135 007-352-19 007-352-20 007-352-23 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2233 W 7TH ST 2237 W 7TH ST 2242 W 7TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #136 #137 #138 007-352-24 007-352-25 007-352-26 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2238 W 7TH ST 2234 W 7TH ST 2230 W 7TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #139 #140 #141 007-352-27 007-352-28 007-352-29 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2226 W 7TH ST 2222 W 7TH ST 2218 W 7TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #142 #143 #144 007-352-30 007-352-31 007-352-32 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2214 W 7TH ST 2210 W 7TH ST 2206 W 7TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #145 #146 #147 007-352-33 007-352-34 007-352-35 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2202 W 7TH ST 2138 W 7TH ST 2134 W 7TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 City Council 26 — 517 1/16/2024 #148 #149 #150 007-352-36 007-352-37 007-352-38 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2130 W 7TH ST 2126 W 7TH ST 2122 W 7TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA £A 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #151 #152 #153 007-352-39 007-352-40 007-352-41 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2118 W 7TH ST 2114 W 7TH ST 2110 W 7TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #154 #155 #156 007-352-42 007-352-46 198-151-35 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT NO CURRENT OCCUPANT 2106 W 7TH ST 711 N FAIRVIEW ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #157 #158 #159 405-211-01 405-211-02 405-211-03 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 730 N FAIRVIEW ST 750 N FAIRVIEW ST 720 N FAIRVIEW ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #160 #161 #162 405-211-04 405-211-07 405-211-08 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 804 N FAIRVIEW ST 2502 W 9TH ST 2506 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #163 #164 #165 405-211-09 405-211-10 405-211-11 CURRENT OCCUPANT NO CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2510 W 9TH ST 2520 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #166 #167 #168 405-211-12 405-211-13 405-211-14 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2526 W 9TH ST 2534 W 9TH ST 2604 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #169 #170 #171 405-211-15 405-211-16 405-211-17 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2608 W 9TH ST 2612 W 9TH ST 2616 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #172 #173 #174 405-211-18 405-211-19 405-211-20 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT NO CURRENT OCCUPANT 2620 W 9TH ST 2624 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #175 #176 #177 405-211-22 405-211-23 405-211-36 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT NO CURRENT OCCUPANT 916 FAIRWAY 920 FAIRWAY SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 City Council 26 — 518 1/16/2024 #178 #179 #180 405-212-01 405-212-02 405-212-09 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2611 W 9TH ST 933 FAIRWAY 924 MARENGO PL SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #181 #182 #183 405-212-10 405-212-11 405-213-01 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2535 W 9TH ST 2605 W 9TH ST 1002 N FAIRVIEW ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #184 #185 #186 405-213-02 405-213-04 405-213-05 NO CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2517 W 9TH ST 2521 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #187 #188 4189 405-213-06 405-213-07 405-213-14 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 923 MARENGO PL 927 MARENGO PL 2507 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #190 #191 #192 405-221-01 405-221-02 405-221-03 NO CURRENT OCCUPANT NO CURRENT OCCUPANT NO CURRENT OCCUPANT #193 #194 #195 405-221-05 405-221-07 405-241-01 NO CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT NO CURRENT OCCUPANT 2701 W 5TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #196 #197 #19$ 405-241-01 405-241-02 405-241-03 NO CURRENT OCCUPANT NO CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 501 N FAIRVIEW ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #199 #199 #199 405-241-04 405-241-04 405-241-04 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 601 N FAIRVIEW ST 651 N FAIRVIEW ST 633 N FAIRVIEW ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #199 #199 #200 405-241-04 405-241-04 939-45-057 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 643 N FAIRVIEW ST 615 N FAIRVIEW ST 2519 W 5TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #201 #202 4203 939-45-057 939-45-058 939-45-058 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2519 W STH ST 2511 W 5TH ST 2511 W 5TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 City Council 26 — 519 1/16/2024 #204 #205 #206 939-45-059 939-45-059 939-45-060 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2501 W 5TH ST 2501 W 5TH ST 2617 W 5TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #207 #208 #209 939-45-060 939-45-061 939-45-061 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2617 W 5TH ST 2609 W 5TH ST 2609 W 5TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #210 #211 #212 939-45-062 939-45-062 939-45-063 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2601 W 5TH ST 2601 W 5TH ST 563 N FAIRVIEW ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #213 #214 #215 939-45-063 939-45-064 939-45-064 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 563 N FAIRVIEW ST 559 N FAIRVIEW ST 559 N FAIRVIEW ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #216 #217 #218 939-45-065 939-45-065 939-45-066 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 555 N FAIRVIEW ST 555 N FAIRVIEW ST 551 N FAIRVIEW ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #219 #220 #221 939-45-066 939-45-067 939-45-067 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 551 N FAIRVIEW ST 547 N FAIRVIEW ST 547 N FAIRVIEW ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #222 #223 #224 939-45-068 939-45-068 939-45-069 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 539 N FAIRVIEW ST 539 N FAIRVIEW ST 531 N FAIRVIEW ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #225 #226 #227 939-45-069 939-45-070 939-45-070 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 531 N FAIRVIEW ST 527 N FAIRVIEW ST 527 N FAIRVIEW ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #228 #229 #230 939-45-071 939-45-071 939-45-072 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 523 N FAIRVIEW ST 523 N FAIRVIEW ST 2501 W 5TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #230 #231 #231 939-45-072 939-45-072 939-45-072 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2519 W 5TH ST 519 N FAIRVIEW ST 2609 W 5TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 City Council 26 — 520 1/16/2024 #231 939-45-072 CURRENT OCCUPANT 523 N FAIRVIEW ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #231 939-45-072 CURRENT OCCUPANT 563 N FAIRVIEW ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #234 939-45-074 CURRENT OCCUPANT 511 N FAIRVIEW ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #231 939-45-072 CURRENT OCCUPANT 547 N FAIRVIEW ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #232 939-45-073 CURRENT OCCUPANT 515 N FAIRVIEW ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #235 939-45-074 CURRENT OCCUPANT 511 N FAIRVIEW ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #231 939-45-072 CURRENT OCCUPANT 555 N FAIRVIEW ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #233 939-45-073 CURRENT OCCUPANT 515 N FAIRVIEW ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 City Council 26 — 521 1/16/2024 RADIUS MAP 1000' SUBJECT PROPERTY ADDRESS: 601 N. FAIRVIEW AVE., SANTAANA, CA92703 APN : 405-241-04 u 95 H H CO I Map Date: 2/9/2023 Graphic Data Source Orange County Geographic Information System Base Parcel Database (Derived from APN Maps) Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane California V FIPS O405 Feet Datum: North American 1983 ' / W 10TH ST Legend jV/ © ® Subject Property 1000' Radius Mailing Lisl W 9TH 2d 2� 9 U 11 12 13 14 95 16 2$ 27 4`28 22 25 21 27} 19 1$ 17 ;� f` S6 97 9s 134 155 135 136 147 W CIVIC CENTER DR W 7TH ST Latest equalized assessment rolls obtained from the Orange ORDER NO. 2023-26 County Assessor's Office through ParcelQuest, a vendor service on 2/9/2023 1 US MAPS 4 LESS MiNING + Ft•K44FERING 0 250 500 1,000 www,radlusolaps41ess.corn ! (909)997.9357 N City Council 26 — 522 1/16/2024 ORANGE COUNTY REPORTER SINCE 1921-- Mailing Address: 600 W SANTA ANA BLVD STE 812, SANTA ANA, CA 92701 Telephone (714) 543-2027 / Fax (714) 542-6841 Visit us @ www.LegalAdstore.com Ingrid Canedo VISTA HERITAGE GLOBAL ACADEMY 2609 W. 5TH STREET SANTA ANA, CA 92703 COPY OF NOTICE Notice Type: GPN GOVT PUBLIC NOTICE Ad Description Vista Sunshine Meeting Notice To the right is a copy of the notice you sent to us for publication in the ORANGE COUNTY REPORTER. Thank you for using our newspaper. Please read this notice carefully and call us with any corrections. The Proof of Publication will be filed with the County Clerk, if required, and mailed to you after the last date below. Publication date(s) for this notice is (are): 02/24/2023 An invoice will be sent after the last date of publication. If you prepaid this order in full, you will not receive an invoice. Daily Journal Corporation Serving your legal advertising needs throughout California. ORANGE COUNTY REPORTER, SANTA ANA (714) 543-2027 BUSINESS JOURNAL, RIVERSIDE (951) 784-0111 DAILY COMMERCE, LOS ANGELES (213) 229-5300 LOS ANGELES DAILY JOURNAL, LOS ANGELES (213) 229-5300 SAN FRANCISCO DAILY JOURNAL, SAN FRANCISCO (800) 640-4829 SAN JOSE POST -RECORD, SAN JOSE (408) 287-4866 THE DAILY RECORDER, SACRAMENTO (916) 444-2355 THE DAILY TRANSCRIPT, SAN DIEGO (619) 232-3486 THE INTER -CITY EXPRESS, OAKLAND (510) 272-4747 uaii�iwiuiu OR# 3674151 26 — 523 1 /16/2024 AGENDA SUNSHINE ORDINANCE COMMUNITY MEETING NOTICE Monday, March 6, 2023 1. Welcome & Overview: Collin Felch, Ed.D., Assistant Super Intendent, Vista Heritage Global Academies 2. Vista Heritage Global Academies Santa Ana Project Details: Team: Don Wilson, Don Wilson, Ed.D., Superintendent, Vista Heritage Global Academies & Collin Felch, Ed.D., Assistant Super Intendent, Vista Heritage Global Academies • Introduction to the Vista Organization • Purpose of District office Space • Purpose of Outdoor Site improvements • Why Santa Ana • Benefits on converting what was on parcel previously into what it can/will be & how does that benefit the community? 3. Land Use Team • Site Overview & Zoning: Vince Fergoso, Principal, The Fergoso Group • Lot Size • Current Zone & use • Proposed Zone Amendments: • Proposed Use • Requested Application • Next Steps & Where we are at 4. Architecture Team —Tony Pacheco -Taylor, AIA, LEED® AP, Studio W Architects, • Building Gross ftz • Exterior architectural Improvements • Site Accessibility modifications • Interior spaces • Interior Upgrades created during improvements • Architectural features • Overall site and structural improvements summary 5. Transportation Engineer & Robert Uv, Traffic Engineer, Urban Xroods 0 Previous Pick up and Drop off & Revised Pick up and Drop Off City Council 26 — 524 1/16/2024 SUNSHINE ORDINANCE SIGN IN SHEET Monday, March 6, 2023 NAME EMAIL PHONE iF. ck, ILA L 4h -V-taq urw WA& • n- 7 -7 o 0 C", City Council 26-525 1/16/2024 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office & Outdoor Space Coming 2024 u City Council 26 — 526 1/16/2024 Who we are: • Vista Charter Public Schools operates 6 free public charter schools in Los Angeles and Orange County serving a total of 1,500 students. C COY City Council 26 - 527 Purpose of District office Space: • Vista Charter Public Schools Headquarters • Host Monthly Board Meetings 1 /16/2024 Location: • 68% of VCPS student enrollment is currently in Orange County 5 ' I ST Vista District Office ACADEMY s CARVER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ' GARFIELD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL � STREETCAR ROUTE MAINTENANCE AND 749 • STOP STORAGE F ACILITY(MSF) ONE-WAVTPAVEL ri • WILLOWICK: POTENTIAL FUTURE STOP dPh0WPutil6 $V•wtosancle 0 IANTATRANS ANA CIVIC CENTER DISTRICT TRANSPORTATION CENTER ORTATIREGIONALEN STATION DISTRICT LOSSAN RAIL CORRIDOR Cit TRICT & 26 — 528 Organizational Hub: • Auto shop acquisition created an opportunity to have a district office located next to our largest school. West Santa Ana Branch Transit Corridor 1 /16/2024 COMMUNITY IMPACT UA LIN , a. " . a Echo Entertaimen . . I '' i 55: 5z ni, CPR w P r i* � t OUTDOOR SITE IMPROVEMENTS 1+75i-'".�''',y""'��f4+,34 +�. � i_ x^ f�'"�,�.•tit ,y,�o�¢ 4�' � 4gd hw ��Ar,�t. r �r `y,' `� F; y�+5 i "R.,`• S+�Y� � Y"- V � t,t^�. n �' f r++.; AW 1 G . 2609 W. 5TH ST. & 601 N. FAIRVIEW PARCEL DIVISION AND PARKING DESIGNATION MAP ---''PARCEL4 E\CLL'SIV UILDIN _ c F1 • PARCEL 4 V. VEHICULAR INGRFSS/FGRFSS 1lI, I I I I I `I !i 3— i k VI•A ISn MPLO SHARED CXY EI PARKINGBUILDING C f7---3 L4i ABI;SINFSS PAPARKING Ei G lllll al'SISE�SS PARK R VISTA GLOBAL B ✓ M AC:ADEMIFS i _PARCEL 2 TE�PFo N — I U;s i r R — R ;BUILaNc D s — R VLSTAICEMPLO SHARED --� PARKING I - City Council -W16/2024 WEaT FIFTH A TART ENLARGED SITE PLAN • Additional lot to provide support functions (does not increase school capacity) • Provides 72 additional parking spaces/reduces impact to Business Park • Enhances student drop-off/pick-up functions • Encourages commercial use that is consistent with Business Park uses • Requires additional Sunshine Meeting (similar to this meeting) • Requires zone change for automotive parcel and amendment to Operational Standards to allow outdoor play area • Planning Commission review and recommendation • City Council action City Council 26 — 533 1 /16/2024 Ak 19'-4- AWAiSE'r- rm L J 1P rt WEST ELEVATION j 4.�.. -TO P-ARAPET PAINTED METAL CANOPY - KELLY MOORE BLACK - EAST ELEVATION 10.5 tr2OL �C 0' F.F. City Council 26 — 534 1/16/2024 10'-5 1 I .L) CA _ 19'-4" OL T.O. PARAPET 2 _ NVPY 6 3 7 F.F. NORTH ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION City Council 26 — 535 1/16/2024 CURRENT ROUTE (E) PAAICNG 3 r Ayy� J EXISTING Hy� BUKEIING 1I7� t (NOT 7N Z e e SCOPEI r g LN) PUBLIC ELFMEATfnRY z C11AflTER SOiOOL EWING e BUILDING iUP a ._ INOT IN -_ SCOPE) ,I.� Di Veh-de Circulation Bus Circulation e' Personal vehicle loading zone Bus loading zone EXISTING BUILDING INOT IN SCOPE) (WI Sth St 02 JA I VISTA HERITAGE CHARTER SCHOOL EXPANSION I TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS EXISTING - BIALOING INOT IN = SCOPE) _ 103 t PROPOSED ROUTE IN 5TH ST City Council 26 — 536 1/16/2024 CURRENT ROUTE IQ PAAICNG 1 � EIIRTING BUILDING SCOPEI '� (E) WAREHOUSE - Bl11lAING IiDNED SO-07] < j?11 PUBLK ELENiENTAAT ' EXISTING CHARTER SCHOOL � c n e BUIICNC w [Nat M scam v Dl Vehicle Circulation Rus Circulaton — Personal vehicle loading zone B� Bus loading zone EXISTING BUILDING (NOT N SCDPEI -'~ STIEXI NG = auLoING - ENOT IN — SDDPE) (w) sth s� ID3 3A I VISTA HERITAGE CHARTER SCHOOL EXPANSION I TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS PROPOSED ROUTE \ \ \ \ (E) BOLLARDS. TYP. DROP OFF REF:BIA5.1 SITE PLAN -TURN AROUND ANALYSIS 1"=20'-0" 1 v 72'-2' J City Council 26 — 537 1/16/2024 �III!'iiiliilliiill II IIII I I Il I diillllllllllllllllllll��iin��, 1 THANK Y City Council Vista Charter Public Schools Sunshine Ordinance Meeting Notes -- March 6, 2023 Q: Where will the outside play area be located? A Where the parking lot directly behind the building is currently located. Q: How big is the play area? A: Unsure. We will check and follow-up. Q: Will the play area affect the flow of traffic? A: No plans to impact the existing traffic flows. The Fairview Avenue curb cut will be used by the new office tenant. Q: Where is the playground located on the master site plan? A: Playground area was pointed out on the map. Q: Why is the zoning being changed? A: To allow an office use that is 100 percent office - the current M-1 zoning does not allow a building that is 100 percent office. Also, we are proposing to amend the operational standards and allow an outdoor play area (currently prohibited). Q: What fencing is proposed? A: Fencing to secure the outdoor play area and outdoor learning area will be installed (fencing identified on the site p(an) Q: Concerns with trucks (up to 50 feet in length) being able to turn west to Fairview Street with the change in circulation A: Will look at ways to accommodate truck traffic City Council 26 — 539 1/16/2024 Q: Concerns that the project may impact and/or violate existing CC&R's A: Both the school and the association will separately look at the CC&Rs for any impacts to the document. Q: Will fencing separate the children's play area from vehicular traffic? A: Yes Q: Concerns with the safety of students and existing pinch points at the south and west ends of the parking lot adjacent to the school and industrial building. A: Traffic engineer to review pinch points and identify potential solutions Q: Project needs to consider potential parking violations by Templo Calvario A: Will work with the City to identify any potential violations of existing entitlements Q: What is the timing of the project? A: School would like to have all improvements completed by beginning of 2024 school year Q: Why outside playground now when original approval had indoor play area only? A: Will provide response at Eater date City Council 26 — 540 1/16/2024 THE FREGOSO GROUP May 31, 2023 Ms. Fernanda Arias Santa Ana Planning Division 20 Civic Center Plaza, M-20 Santa Ana, CA. 92702 RE: Submittal of May 15, 2023, Second Sunshine Meeting documents — Vista Charter Public Schools Dear Ms. Arias, On behalf of Vista Charter Public Schools and Red Hook Capital Partners, please find the enclosed materials required by the Sunshine Ordinance for the May 15, 2023 second Sunshine Meeting for the Vista Charter Public Schools proposed zone change (amendment application) and amendments to the SD-82 zoning district at 601 N. Fairview Street. The following material are provided for your use: 1. Community meeting notice (English and Spanish) 2. List of property owners within 1000 feet of the site 3. List of occupants within 1000 feet of the site 4. The 1000-foot notification radius map S. Proof of publication in the local newspaper 6. Meeting agenda 7. Sign -in sheet 8. Copy of the PowerPoint presentation for the meeting 9. Meeting minutes/Questions and answers This letter confirms, under penalty of perjury, that the required meeting, notifications and materials were prepared and distributed in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance of the City of Santa Ana. Respectfully, Vince Fregoso The Fregoso Group On behalf of Vista Charter Public Schools City Council 26 — 541 1/16/2024 SUNSHINE ORDINANCE COMMUNITY MEETING NOTICE You are invited to attend a Community Meeting for the project described below: Subject: Amend the zoning of the northwest parcel from Industrial to Specific Development No. 82 (SD-82) to be consistent with the majority of the parcel and to amend the Operational Standards of the SD-82 zoning to allow outdoor recreation areas. Spanish language translators will be available during the meeting. Location: 2609 West Fifth Street (Vista Heritage Bay 2 Cafeteria) Meeting Date: Monday, May 25, 2023 Meeting Time: 6:30 pm to 7:30 pm Meeting Location: Vista Heritage Bay 3 Cafeteria 2609 West Fifth Street Notification Area: Project Site: Meeting Site: For more Information, contact Vince Fregoso at 714-904-4506 or Ingrid Canedo at 818-309-3664 City Council 26 — 542 1/16/2024 SUNSHINE ORDINANCE AVISO DE REUNION COMUNITARIA Esta invitado a asistir a una reunion comunitaria para del proyecto descrito a continuacion: Proposito. Modificar la zonificacion industrial de la propiedad ubicada en la parte noroeste de la escuela de la zona industrial a desarrollo especifico No. 82 (SD-82) para que coincida con la mayor parte del terreno junto, que viene siendo la escueia. La modificacion tambidn agregara terminos generales a la zona SD-82 para incluir actividades fisicas al afire fibre. Traductores en lenguaje espanol estarAn presentes durante la reunion. Ubicaclon: 2609 West Fifth Street (la cafeteria de bay 2 de Vista Heritage School) Fecha de reunion: Lunes, 15 de Mayo de 2023 Hora de reunion: 6:30 p. m. a 7:30 p. m. Lugar de reunion: La cafeteria de bay 3 de Vista Heritage School 2609 West Fifth Street Area de Notificacioi Sitio de Projecto: Sito de Reunion: Para mcis informacion, comuniquese con Vince Fregoso al 714-904-4506 o Ingrid Canedo al 818-309-3664 City Council 26 — 543 1/16/2024 #1 004-152-01 IUS MAPS 4 LESS ARMANDO & JOSEFINA E ESPARZA r'LA?0411;G .2222 W 107H ST W mi-radiusmaos4less.com 1 (909) 997-9357 SANTA ANA CA 92703 ORDER NO: 2023-26 DATE: 02/09/2023 #3 004-152-10 HOLDINGS SORENTO 2209 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #6 004-152-13 ESTHER AVALOS MAFFEY 2225 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #9 004-153-02 ESTELA LORA GUERRERO 2230 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #12 004-153-05 REBECCA P CAMPOS 2218W9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #15 004-153-08 LONG TRAN 2206 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #18 004-153-11 RODOLFO & STELLA LICERIO 2141 W CIVIC CENTER DR SANTA ANA CA 92703 #21 004-153-14 IGNACIO D GONZALES 2205 CIVIC CENTER DR WEST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #24 004-153-18 MASTAN INC 811 N FAIRVIEW ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #27 004-183-02 CARLOS H PEREGRINA 2130 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #4 0D4-152-11 HOLLY NHIHA LE 2217 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #7 004-152-14 CANDIDA G OLIVAS 2229 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #10 004-153-03 STEVEN HUU & TAMMY CHANH NGUYEN 6945 ALTAIR CT CORONA CA 92880 #13 004-153-06 TEODULO MONTIELADAME 2214 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #16 004-153-09 DANIEL PEREZ & JILL E AVILA 2202 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #19 004-153-12 NGOC TRAN 2145 W CIVIC CENTER DR SANTA ANA CA 92703 #22 004-153-16 SOUTHLAND HOMES REAL ESTATE & INVESTMENT 10448 SALINAS RIVER CIR FOUNTAIN VALLEY CA 92708 #25 004-153-20 EDELIRA MORENO 2209 W CIVIC CENTER DR SANTA ANA CA 92703 #28 004-183-03 VICTORIA FLORES RODRIGUEZ 2126 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #2 004-152-09 HOLDINGS SORENTO 2209 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #5 004-152-12 ERIC R LOPEZ 2221 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #8 004-153-01 WINSTON HUYNH 2234 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #11 004-153-04 DIOSFORO & MARIA E SERNA 2222 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #14 004-153-07 ANTONIO RODRIGUEZ TRUJILLO 2210 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #17 004-153-10 RICARDO H & ANA L HARO 2137 CIVIC CENTER DR WEST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #20 004-153-13 ANDY 0 MUNOZ 2019 VALENCIA ST SANTA ANA CA 92706 #23 004-153-17 JUAN D & CAROLYN E MEDRANO 2221 W CIVIC CENTER DR SANTA ANA CA 92703 #26 004-183-01 SERGIO MORENO JUAREZ 2134 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #29 004-183-15 ANDREW JONATHAN & DIANA ROSE MUNOZ 2129 W CIVIC CENTER DR SANTA ANA CA 92703 City Council 26 — 544 1/16/2024 #30 #32 004-183-16 004-183-17 DAVID NGUYEN MICHAEL B MATTINGLEY 3361 RURAL CIR 4006 CALLE MARLENA CORONA CA 92882 SAN CLEMENTE CA 92672 #33 #34 004-183-24 007-021-02 REYNALDO & ZOILA VERGARA TURN HOANG NGUYEN 2125 CIVIC CTR 7662 LEHIEN PL SANTA ANA CA 92703 WESTMINSTER CA 92683 #36 #37 007-021-04 007-021-05 NESTOR ALEJANDRES GEORGE 8 COBARRUVIA 2317 6TH ST 2309 6TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #39 #40 007-021-08 007-021-10 JOSE & YOLANDA ZAVALA TUNG DINH PHAN 2339 6TH ST 14822 ALCESTER ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 WESTMINSTER CA 92683 #42 #43 007-022-01 007-022-04 FORTH E SOUL LLC HOMES MICHAEL A MADZOEFF 1616 FLOWER AVE 211 MARIGOLD AVE FULLERTON CA 92833 CORONA DEL MAR CA 92625 #45 #46 007-022-06 007-022-07 MICHAEL A MADZOEFF MICHAEL A MADZOEFF 211 MARIGOLD AVE 211 MARIGOLD AVE CORONA DEL MAR CA 92625 CORONA DEL MAR CA 92625 #48 #49 007-022-13 007-022-16 INDELISA QUINTERO MICHAEL A MADZOEFF 2424 6TH ST 211 MARIGOLD AVE SANTA ANA CA 92703 CORONA DEL MAR CA 92625 #51 #52 007-022-19 007-022-20 JAKE J YOON FRANCISCO JAVIER PERAZA 23015TH ST 2414 6TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #54 #55 007-022-23 007-022-24 AVA ENTERPRISES MICHAELA MADZOEFF 2831 1ST ST 211 MARIGOLD AVE SANTA ANA CA 92703 CORONA DEL MAR CA 92625 #57 #58 007-022-26 007-022-29 ORANGE COUNTY TRANSIT RICK D KAGASOFF PO BOX 14184 2023 HELIOTROPE ORANGE CA 92863 SANTA ANA CA 92706 #32 004-183-22 HERIBERTO & MARIA MERCADO 2121 CIVIC CENTER DR SANTA ANA CA 92703 #35 007-021-03 ARTURO F DURAZO 2321 6TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #38 007-021-06 EUGENEJONES 12921 ROSALIND DR SANTA ANA CA 92705 #41 007-021-14 JPACIFIC INTERNATIONAL 13043 BACH WAY CERRITOS CA 90703 TR6TH SA GARDEN #44 007-022-05 MICHAEL A MADZOEFF 211 MARIGOLD AVE CORONA DEL MAR CA 92625 #47 007-022-09 JAKE J YOON 2301 5TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #50 007-022-17 MICHAEL A MADZOEFF 211 MARIGOLD AVE CORONA DEL MAR CA 92625 #53 007-022-21 LA RIVA ROSIE V DE 2418 6TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #56 007-022-25 MICHAEL A MADZOEFF 211 MARIGOLD AVE CORONA DEL MAR CA 92625 #59 007-022-30 JAKE 1 YOON 23015TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 City Council 26 — 545 1/16/2024 #60 #61 #62 007-022-31 007-022-32 007-022-33 MICHAEL A MAD ZOEFF JAKE J YOON MICHAEL A MAD ZOEFF 211 MARIGOLD AVE 2301 5TH ST 211 MARIGOLD AVE CORONA DEL MAR CA 92625 SANTA ANA CA 92703 CORONA DEL MAR CA 92625 #63 #64 #65 007-110-01 007-120-24 007-120-25 KEVIN OVERGAAUW RICK D KAGASOFF T R KIRWAN 2308 5TH ST 2023 HELIOTROPE 5133 LORELEI AVE SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92706 LAKEWOOD CA 90712 #66 #67 #68 007-120-26 007-120-27 007-120-28 JOSE LUIS CHOCOTECO CHARLES A HATFIELD CHUNG-YEN & YEN -LING HHANG 1002 ROSITA ST 25852 PECOS RD 19819 MT SCHELIN CIR SANTA ANA CA 92703 LAGUNA HILLS CA 92653 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CA 92708 #69 #70 #71 007-120-43 007-120-44 007-120-46 KELLY E CHAPMAN KELLY E CHAPMAN DION C CHAPMAN 24242 SANTA CLARA AVE 11 24242 SANTA CLARA AVE 11 30442 BENECIA DANA POINT CA 92629 DANA POINT CA 92629 LAGUNA NIGUEL CA 92677 #72 #73 #74 007-120-48 007-121-01 007-121-02 ORANGE COUNTY TRANSIT RICK D KAGASOFF FIFTH STREET CAPITAL WEST P O BOX 3005 2023 HELIOTROPE 55 FANLIGHT GARDEN GROVE CA 92840 SANTA ANA CA 92705 IRVINE CA 92620 #75 #76 #77 007-121-03 007-121-04 007-121-05 MARANATHA REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS LLC HBBF RICK D KAGASOFF 411 SULLIVAN ST 410 NANTUCKET PL 2023 HELIOTROPE DR SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92706 #78 #79 #80 007-121-06 007-121-07 007-121-08 RICK D KAGASOFF CYMC LLC CYMC LLC 2023 HELIOTROPE 321 SULLIVAN ST 301 SULLIVAN ST SANTA ANA CA 92705 SANTA ANA CA SANTA ANA CA 92703 #81 #82 #83 007-121-09 007-121-10 007-141-04 CYMC LLC RICK D KAGASOFF CHRIS R SOLDAN 2430 CAPE COD WAY 2023 HELIOTROPE DR 7243 CAMBRIA CIR SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92706 ORANGE CA 92869 #84 #85 #86 007-141-11 007-141-24 007-141-26 SPACE PROPERTIES TWO LLC EXTRA PHUC VIET TRAN RICK D KAGASOFF 2795 COTTONWOOD PKWY #400 126 MAXINE ST 2023 HELIOTROPE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84121 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92706 #87 #88 #89 007-141-29 007-141-31 007-141-35 W& M PROPERTIES W& M PROPERTIES F C B PROPERTIES 1479 MUSTANG AVE 1479 MUSTANG AVE 6138 JAMESALAN ST ORANGE CA 92869 ORANGE CA 92869 CYPRESS CA 90630 City Council 26 — 546 1/16/2024 #90 #91 #92 007-141-42 007-141-66 007-141-67 CHRIS R SOLDAN MAS LLC YIA ANA MINI STORAGE SANTA 7243 CAMBRIA CIR 16741 GLENHAVEN LN 5901 ENCINA RD C-5 ORANGE CA 92869 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 GOLETA CA 93117 #93 #94 #95 007-141-76 007-141-77 007-242-01 CHRIS R SOLDAN W & M PROPERTIES GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF ORANGE COUNTY 7243 CAMBRIA CIR 1479 MUSTANG AVE CA ORANGE CA 92869 ORANGE CA 92869 410 FAIRVIEW ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #96 #97 #98 D07-351-01 007-351-02 007-351-03 MOHAMMAD ARAFEEN QUERASHI MOHAMMAD ARAFEEN QUERASHI MARIA FLORES 6633 PASEO FIESTA DR 6633 PASEO FIESTA DR 2230 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE WEST ANAHEIM HILLS CA 92703 ANAHEIM HILLS CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92701 #99 #100 #101 007-351-04 007-351-05 007-351-06 JOHN A MONREAL KENNY QUYEN LIEU EZEQUIEL SEGURA 2226 CIVIC CENTER DR WEST 2222 CIVIC CENTER DR 2218 CIVIC CENTER DR SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #102 #103 #104 007-351-07 007-351-08 007-351-09 RODRIGO SANTIAGO PACHECO REYMUNDO & EVA M DOMINGUEZ JOSE PATINO 2214 CIVIC CENTER DR 2210 CIVIC CENTER DR WEST 2206 CIVIC CENTER DR SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #105 #106 #107 007-351-10 007-351-11 007-351-14 NHUT NGOC NGUYEN RAYMOND M ZAMORA NOE & MIREYA VARGAS 801 COURTNEY 2148 CIVIC CENTER DR WEST 2136 CIVIC CENTER DR FULLERTON CA 92833 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #108 #109 #110 007-351-15 007-351-16 007-351-19 ANDRES FLORES VINA PROPERTIES FAUSTO MACHADO 2132 CIVIC CTR 7241 WESTMINSTER BLVD 2116 CIVIC CENTER DR WEST SANTA ANA CA 92703 WESTMINSTER CA 92683 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #111 #112 #113 007-351-24 007-351-26 007-351-28 VENA & JULIE F SCANLAN EPIFANIO GONZALEZ ALEJANDRO GAVINA 2144 CIVIC CENTER DR 2140 CIVIC DR 2124 CIVIC CENTER DR SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #114 #115 #116 007-351-30 007-351-32 007-352-02 CONSTANTINO SALINAS RODRIGUEZ JOSE D ORTIZ CHRISTOPHER A OVIEDO 2120 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE WEST 2112 CIVIC CENTER DR 2105 7TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #117 #118 #119 007-352-03 007-352-04 007-352-05 ESTEVAN N RAMIREZ ROGELIO SILVA LUIS MELCHOR PENALOZA 2110 7TH ST 2113 7TH ST 2117 7TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 City Council 26 — 547 1/16/2024 #120 #121 #122 007-352-06 007-352-07 007-352-08 JARELY MELCHOR HUAN NGUYEN RAUL LOPEZ 21217TH ST 2125 7TH ST 2129 7TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #123 #124 #125 007-352-09 007-352-10 007-352-11 YANLING SUN JAIME MUNOZ SIMONA M PERALES 2133 7TH ST 1730 WASHINGTON 22017TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92706 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #126 #127 #128 007-352-12 007-352-13 007-352-14 ROMAN ANTHONY REYNA JOANNA L PETERSON HECTOR MELENDEZ 2205 7TH ST 2533 HESPERIAN ST 2213 7TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92706 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #129 #130 #131 007-352-15 007-352-16 007-352-17 SERGIO GASCA MANRIQUEZ MACXIMILLIANO P CEBALLOS ELVA MENDEZ 2217 7TH ST 2221 17TH ST 2225 7TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #132 #133 #134 007-352-18 007-352-19 007-352-20 FERNANDO RODRIGUEZ CHAVEZ VICTOR MANUEL PEREZ JOSE V VALDEZ 2229 7TH ST 2233 7TH ST 2237 7TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #135 #136 #137 007-352-23 007-352-24 007-352-25 THACH JADE HOANG CHUONG MAI JUAN DIAZ 2242 7TH ST 2238 7TH ST 2234 7TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #138 #139 #140 007-352-26 007-352-27 007-352-28 ROBERT ANTHONY FLORES CATHY L BUENDIA RACHEL CAMACHO 2230 7TH ST 2226 7TH ST 1242 CEDAR SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92707 #141 #142 #143 007-352-29 007-352-30 007-352-31 CATALINA & JOSE A ANDRADE JOHNNY C NGUYEN ESTHER C GONZALEZ 2218 7TH ST 2214 7TH ST 2210 7TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #144 #145 #146 007-352-32 007-352-33 007-352-34 KHIET DO MARGARITA CORTES LILIANA FAUSTO 2206 7TH ST 2202 7TH ST 2138 7TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #147 #148 #149 007-352-35 007-352-36 007-352-37 BRAD & WENDY PEIKERT BRAD & WENDY PEIKERT ENRIQUE PENA 2130 7TH 5T 2130 7TH ST 2126 7TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 City Council 26 — 548 1/16/2024 #150 #151 #152 007-352-38 007-352-39 007-352-40 ISRAEL VERGARA ALVAREZ ISRAEL & ELEAZER MONTES VERGARA AGUSTIN & MARICELA ANAYA 2122 7TH ST 2118 7TH ST 2114 7TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #153 007-352-41 ESTEVAN N RAMIREZ 2110 7TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #156 198-151-35 KIM EAR KUONG 12636 CASA BONITA PL VICTORVILLE CA 92392 #159 405-211-03 SCHOOL SANTA ANA UNIFIEDDISTRICT 1601 CHESTNUT AVE SANTA ANA CA 92701 #162 405-211-08 ROSA MENDIVIL 1424 LOWELLST SANTA ANA CA 92706 #165 405-211-11 LUIS B & MARIA D L RODRIGUEZ 2520 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #168 405-211-14 DANH C NGUYEN 2606 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #171 405-211-17 ALFREDA & PABLO JUAREZ 2618 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #174 405-211-20 BERTRAM F RUDOLPH P 0 BOX 2302 CARMEL CA 93921 #177 405-211-36 SCHOOL SANTA ANA UNIFIEDDISTRICT 1405 FRENCH ST SANTA ANA CA 92701 #154 007-352-42 EDNA L MEJIA 1239 BAKER ST SANTA ANA CA 92707 #157 405-211-01 SCHOOL SANTA ANA UNIFIEDDISTRICT 1405 FRENCH ST SANTA ANA CA 92701 #160 405-211-04 SCHOOL SANTA ANA UNIFIEDDISTRICT 1405 FRENCH ST SANTA ANA CA 92701 #163 405-211-09 THAI JENNIFER LOAN 9350 BOLSA AVE SPC 58 WESTMINSTER CA 92683 #166 405-211-12 JUAN JUAREZ HERNANDEZ 2528 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #169 405-211-15 MAIRA & NOEL ISRAEL AYALA 1718 TURQUOISE DR CORONA CA 92882 #172 405-211-18 NGUYEN VIET CAO 16576 MTTODD ST FOUNTAIN VALLEY CA 92708 #175 405-211-22 TAI VAN LAM 11460 VIA PLAYA CORTES WAY SAN DIEGO CA 92124 #178 405-212-01 MY TRAN DUE LUU 9509 PRICHARD ST BELLFLOWER CA 90706 #155 007-352-46 MOHAMMAD ARAFEEN QUERASHI 6633 PASEO FIESTA DR ANAHEIM HILLS CA 92703 #158 405-211-02 SCHOOL SANTA ANA UNIFIEDDISTRICT 1405 FRENCH ST SANTA ANA CA 92701 #161 405-211-07 GERALD L HIGDON 12692 BONITA HEIGHTS DR SANTA ANA CA 92705 #164 405-211-10 ORVILLE N ROSEBEARY 16461 VENUS DR WESTMINSTER CA 92683 #167 405-211-13 FELIX CIBRIAN 2534 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #170 405-211-16 IRMA OROZCO 11858 MAYFLOWER CIR FOUNTAIN VALLEY CA 92708 #173 405-211-19 RODOLFO MUNOZ 2624 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #176 405-211-23 SOUTHLAND HOMES REAL 10448 SALINAS RIVER CI FOUNTAIN VALLEY CA 92708 #179 405-212-02 GUADALUPE OLEA 933 FAIR WAY SANTA ANA CA 92703 City Council 26 — 549 1/16/2024 #180 #181 #182 405-212-09 405-212-10 405-212-11 MARCELINO & EUSTOLIA JUAREZ TENTH DO MANUEL GARCIA RIZO 924 MARENGO PL 422 MAXINE ST 2607 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92704 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #183 405-213-01 DENISE LE 1002 FAIRVIEW ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #186 405-213-05 CUAUHTEMOC FERNANDEZ 25219TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #189 405-213-14 OF SANTA ANA CITY 20 CIVIC CENTER PLAZA M-30 SANTA ANA CA 92701 #192 405-221-03 SCHOOL SANTA ANA UNIFIEDDIST OF ORANGE 1405 FRENCH ST SANTA ANA CA 92701 #195 405-241-01 PARCEL HOLD #198 405-241-03 KITCHENS QOZB FAIRVIEW 402 OCEAN VIEW AVE ENCI N ITAS CA 92024 #201 939-45-057 CALVARIO TEMPLO 25015TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #204 939-45-059 CALVARIO TEMPLO 25015TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #207 939-45-060 2609 W 5TH STREET 2900 TEMPLE ST LOS ANGELES CA 90026 #184 405-213-02 DENISE LE 1002 FAIRVIEW ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #187 405-213-06 RAYMOND CC YANG 2628 DEEGAN OR SANTA ANA CA 92704 #190 405-221-01 SCHOOL SANTA ANA UNIFIEDDIST OF ORANGE 1405 FRENCH ST SANTA ANA CA 92701 #193 405-221-05 ORANGE COUNTY TRANSIT P O BOX 3005 GARDEN GROVE CA 92840 #196 405-242-01 PARCEL HOLD #199 405-241-04 2609 W 5TH STREET 2900 TEMPLE ST LOS ANGELES CA 90026 #202 939-45-059 CALVARIO TEMPLO 25015TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #205 939-45-059 CALVARIO TEMPLO 2501 5TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #208 939-45-061 2609 W 5TH STREET 2900 TEMPLE ST LOS ANGELES CA 90026 #185 405-213-04 JORGE G FRUTOS 2517 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #188 405-213-07 DIANA MELINA VALENZUELA PEREZ 927 MARENGO PL SANTA ANA CA 92703 #191 405-221-02 SCHOOL SANTA ANA UNIFIEDDIST OF ORANGE 1405 FRENCH ST SANTA ANA CA 92701 #194 405-221-07 SCHOOL SANTA ANA UNIFIEDDIST OF ORANGE 1405 FRENCH ST SANTA ANA CA 92701 #197 405-241-02 ORANGE COUNTY TRANSIT P 0 BOX 3005 GARDEN GROVE CA 92840 #200 939-45-057 CALVARIO TEMPLO 25015TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #203 939-45-058 CALVARIO TEMPLO 25015TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #206 939-45-060 2609 W 5TH STREET 2900 TEMPLE ST LOS ANGELES CA 90026 #209 939-45-061 2609 W 5TH STREET 2900 TEMPLE ST LOS ANGELES CA 90026 City Council 26 — 550 1/16/2024 #210 #211 #212 939-45-062 939-45-062 939-45-063 2609 W 5TH STREET 2609 W 5TH STREET GENERATION TILE & MARBLE NEW 2900 TEMPLE ST 2900 TEMPLE ST 563 FAIRVIEW ST LOS ANGELES CA 90026 LOS ANGELES CA 90026 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #213 #214 #215 939-45-063 939-45-064 939-45-064 GENERATION TILE & MARBLE NEW WILBERT MARRUFO WILBERT MARRUFO 563 FAIRVIEW ST 559 FAIRVIEW ST 559 FAIRVIEW ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #216 #217 #218 939-45-065 939-45-065 939-45-066 WILBERT MARRUFO WILBERT MARRUFO DHANANIAYA N MHASKAR 555 FAIRVIEW ST 555 FAIRVIEW ST 3972 BARRANCA PKWY J158 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 IRVINE CA 92606 #219 #220 #221 939-45-066 939-45-067 939-45-067 DHANANIAYA N MHASKAR SCOTTY LEE SCOTTY LEE 3972 BARRANCA PKWY J158 13791 DIEPPE CIR 13791 DIEPPE CIR IRVINE CA 92606 GARDEN GROVE CA 92843 GARDEN GROVE CA 92843 #222 #223 #224 939-45-068 939-45-068 939-45-069 CURTIS & BETTY TOM CURTIS & BETTY TOM EN HONG & JANG LAN SHEN 24982 LUNA BONITA DR 24982 LUNA BONITA DR 3314 MEADOWRIDGE LAGUNA HILLS CA 92653 LAGUNA HILLS CA 92653 ORANGE CA 92867 #225 #226 #227 939-45-069 939-45-070 939-45-070 EN HONG & JANG LAN SHEN EDWARD DONLEY EDWARD DONLEY 3314 MEADOWRIDGE 19432 CLOVER 19432 CLOVER ORANGE CA 92867 SANTA ANA CA 92705 SANTA ANA CA 92705 #228 #229 #230 939-45-071 939-45-071 939-45-072 BARRY J UNCK BARRY J EINCK ROBERT C HUNT 14681 DAN BERRY CIR 14681 DANBERRY CIR 28371 MODJESKA CANYON RD TUSTIN CA 92780 TUSTIN CA 92780 MODJESKA CA 92676 #231 #232 #233 939-45-072 939-45-073 939-45-073 ROBERT C HUNT TAI TAN PHAM TAI TAN PHAM 28371 MODJESKA CANYON RD 302 TULIP TREE AVE 302 TULIP TREE AVE MODJESKA CA 92676 ORANGE CA 92865 ORANGE CA 92865 #234 939-45-074 HANH BICH HOANG 16572 GRAHAM PL HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 #235 939-45-074 HANH BICH HOANG 16572 GRAHAM PL HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 City Council 26 — 551 1/16/2024 #1 #2 #3 004-152-01 004-152-09 004-152-10 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2222 W 10TH ST 2209 W 9TH ST 2213 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #4 #5 #6 004-152-11 004-152-12 004-152-13 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2217 W 9TH ST 2221 W 9TH ST 2225 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #7 #8 #9 004-152-14 004-153-01 004-153-02 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2229 W 9TH ST 2234 W 9TH ST 2230 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #10 #11 #12 004-153-03 004-153-04 004-153-05 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2226 W 9TH ST 2222 W 9TH ST 2218 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #13 #14 #15 004-153-06 004-153-07 004-153-08 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2214 W 9TH ST 2210 W 9TH ST 2206 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #16 #17 #18 004-153-09 004-153-10 004-153-11 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2202 W 9TH ST 2137 W CIVIC CENTER DR 2141 W CIVIC CENTER DR SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #19 #20 #21 004-153-12 004-153-13 004-153-14 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2145 W CIVIC CENTER DR 2201 W CIVIC CENTER DR 2205 W CIVIC CENTER DR SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #22 #23 #24 004453-16 004-153-17 004-153-18 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2217 W CIVIC CENTER DR 2221 W CIVIC CENTER OR 809 N FAIRVIEW ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #24 #24 #24 004-153-18 004-153-18 004-153-18 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 811 N FAIRVIEW ST 813 N FAIRVIEW ST 815 N FAIRVIEW ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #25 #26 #27 004-153-20 004-183-01 004-183-02 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2209 W CIVIC CENTER DR 2134 W 9TH ST 2130 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 City Council 26 — 552 1/16/2024 #28 #29 #30 004-183-03 004-183-15 004-183-16 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2126 W 9TH ST 2129 W CIVIC CENTER DR 2133 W CIVIC CENTER DR SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #31 #32 #33 004-183-17 004-183-22 004-183-24 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2119 W CIVIC CENTER DR 2121 W CIVIC CENTER DR 2125 W CIVIC CENTER DR SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #34 #35 #36 007-021-02 007-021-03 007-021-04 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2325 W 6TH ST 2321 W 6TH ST 2317 W 6TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #37 #38 #39 007-021-05 007-021-06 007-021-08 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2309 W 6TH ST 2307 W 6TH ST 2339 W 6TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #40 #41 #42 007-021-10 007-021-14 007-022-01 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2331 W 6TH ST 2333 W 6TH ST 2430 W 6TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #43 #44 #45 007-022-04 007-022-05 007-022-06 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2334 W 6TH ST 2328 W 6TH ST 2324 W 6TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #46 #47 #48 007-022-07 007-022-09 007-022-13 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2328 W 6TH ST 2304 W 6TH ST 2424 W 6TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #49 #50 #51 007-022-16 007-022-17 007-022-19 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2325 W 5TH ST 2317 W 5TH ST 2310 W 6TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #52 #53 #54 007-022-20 0D7-022-21 007-022-23 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2414 W 6TH ST 2418 W 6TH ST 2338 W 6TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #55 #56 #57 007-022-24 007-022-25 007-022-26 NO CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT NO CURRENT OCCUPANT 2329 W 5TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 City Council 26 — 553 1/16/2024 #58 #59 #60 007-022-29 007-022-30 007-022-31 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2415 W 5TH ST 2301 W STH ST 2314 W 6TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #61 #62 #63 007-022-32 007-022-33 007-110-01 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2301 W 5TH ST 2315 W 5TH ST 2308 W STH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #64 #65 #66 007-120-24 007-120-25 007-120-26 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2400 W STH ST 2401 CAPE COD WAY Al2 2350 W STH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #67 #68 #69 007-120-27 007-120-28 007-120-43 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2351 CAPE COD WAY 2330 W STH ST 2341 CAPE COD WAY SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #70 #71 #72 007-120-44 007-120-46 007-120-48 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT NO CURRENT OCCUPANT 2331 CAPE COD WAY 2321 CAPE COD WAY SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #73 #74 #75 007-121-01 007-121-02 007-221-03 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2430 W STH ST 2410 W 5TH ST 411 N SULLIVAN ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #76 #77 #78 007-121-04 007-121-05 007-121-06 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 410 NANTUCKET PL 401 N SULLIVAN ST 400 NANTUCKET PL SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #79 #80 #81 007-121-07 0D7-121-08 007-121-09 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 321 N SULLIVAN ST 301 N SULLIVAN ST 2430 CAPE COD WAY SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #82 #83 #84 007-121-10 007-141-04 007-141-11 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2420 CAPE COD WAY 302 N SULLIVAN ST 2602 W STH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #85 #86 #87 007-141-24 007-141-26 007-141-29 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2520 W 5TH ST 2518 W STH ST 408 N SULLIVAN ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 City Council 26 — 554 1/16/2024 #88 #89 #90 007-141-31 007-141-35 007-141-42 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 406 N SULLIVAN ST 412 N SULLIVAN ST 402 N SULLIVAN ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #91 #92 #93 007-141-66 007-141-67 007-141-76 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 419 N FAIRVIEW ST 401 N FAIRVIEW ST 308 N SULLIVAN ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #94 #95 #96 007-141-77 007-142-01 007-351-01 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 404 N SULLIVAN ST 404 N FAIRVIEW ST 711 N FAIRVIEW ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #97 #98 ##99 007-351-02 007-351-03 007-351-04 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 711 N FAIRVIEW ST 2230 W CIVIC CENTER DR 2226 W CIVIC CENTER OR SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #100 #101 #102 007-351-05 007-351-06 007-351-07 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2222 W CIVIC CENTER DR 2218 W CIVIC CENTER DR 2214 W CIVIC CENTER DR SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #103 #104 #105 007-351-08 007-351-09 007-3S1-10 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2210 W CIVIC CENTER DR 2206 W CIVIC CENTER DR 2202 W CIVIC CENTER DR SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #106 #107 #108 007-351-11 007-351-14 007-351-15 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2148 W CIVIC CENTER DR 2136 W CIVIC CENTER DR 2132 W CIVIC CENTER DR SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #109 #110 #111 007-351-16 007-351-19 007-351-24 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2128 W CIVIC CENTER DR 2116 W CIVIC CENTER DR 2144 W CIVIC CENTER DR SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #112 #113 #114 007-351-26 007-351-28 007-351-30 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2140 W CIVIC CENTER DR 2124 W CIVIC CENTER DR 2120 W CIVIC CENTER DR SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #115 #116 #117 007-351-32 007-352-02 007-352-03 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2112 W CIVIC CENTER DR 2105 W 7TH ST 2109 W 7TN ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 City Council 26 — 555 1/16/2024 #118 #119 #120 007-352-04 007-352-05 007-352-06 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2113 W 7TH ST 2117 W 7TH ST 2121 W 7TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #121 #122 #123 007-352-07 007-352-08 007-352-09 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2125 W 7TH ST 2129 W 7TH ST 2133 W 7TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #124 #125 #126 007-352-10 007-352-11 007-352-12 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2137 W 7TH ST 2201 W 7TH ST 2205 W 7TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #127 #128 #129 007-352-13 007-352-14 007-352-15 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2209 W 7TH ST 2213 W 7TH ST 2217 W 7TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #130 #131 #132 007-3S2-16 007-352-17 007-352-18 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2221 W 7TH ST 2225 W 7TH ST 2229 W 7TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #133 #134 #135 007-352-19 007-352-20 007-352-23 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2233 W 7TH ST 2237 W 7TH ST 2242 W 7TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #136 #137 #138 007-352-24 007-352-25 007-352-26 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2238 W 7TH ST 2234 W 7TH ST 2230 W 7TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #139 #140 #141 007-352-27 007-352-28 007-352-29 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2226 W 7TH ST 2222 W 7TH ST 2218 W 7TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #142 #143 #144 007-352-30 007-352-31 007-352-32 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2214 W 7TH ST 2210 W 7TH ST 2206 W 7TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #145 #146 #147 007-352-33 007-352-34 007-352-35 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2202 W 7TH ST 2138 W 7TH ST 2134 W 7TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 City Council 26 — 556 1/16/2024 #148 #149 #150 007-352-36 007-352-37 007-352-38 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2130 W 7TH ST 2126 W 7TH ST 2122 W 7TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #151 #152 #153 007-352-39 007-352-40 007-352-41 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2118 W 7TH ST 2114 W 7TH ST 2110 W 7TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #154 #155 #156 007-352-42 007-352-46 198-151-35 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT NO CURRENT OCCUPANT 2106 W 7TH ST 711 N FAIRVIEW ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #157 #158 #159 405-211-01 405-211-02 405-211-03 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 730 N FAIRVIEW ST 750 N FAIRVIEW ST 720 N FAIRVIEW ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #160 #161 #162 405-211-04 405-211-07 405-211-08 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 804 N FAIRVIEW ST 2502 W 9TH ST 2506 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #163 #164 #165 405-211-09 405-211-10 405-211-11 CURRENT OCCUPANT NO CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2510 W 9TH ST 2520 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #166 #167 #168 405-211-12 405-211-13 405-211-14 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2526 W 9TH ST 2534 W 9TH ST 2604 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #169 #170 #171 405-211-15 405-211-16 405-211-17 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2608 W 9TH ST 2612 W 9TH ST 2616 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #172 #173 #174 405-211-18 405-211-19 405-211-20 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT NO CURRENT OCCUPANT 2620 W 9TH ST 2624 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #175 #176 #177 405-211-22 405-211-23 405-211-36 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT NO CURRENT OCCUPANT 916 FAIR WAY 920 FAIR WAY SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 City Council 26 — 557 1/16/2024 #178 #179 #180 405-212-01 405-212-02 405-212-09 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2611 W 9TH ST 933 FAIRWAY 924 MARENGO PL SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #181 #182 #183 405-212-10 405-212-11 405-213-01 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2535 W 9TH ST 2605 W 9TH ST 1002 N FAIRVIEW ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #184 #185 #186 405-213-02 405-213-04 405-213-05 NO CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2517 W 9TH ST 2521 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #187 #188 #189 405-213-06 405-213-07 405-213-14 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 923 MARENGO PL 927 MARENGO PL 2507 W 9TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #190 #191 #192 405-221-01 405-221-02 405-221-03 NO CURRENT OCCUPANT NO CURRENT OCCUPANT NO CURRENT OCCUPANT #193 #194 #195 405-221-05 405-221-07 405-241-01 NO CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT NO CURRENT OCCUPANT 2701 W 5TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #196 #197 #198 405-241-01 405-241-02 405-241-03 NO CURRENT OCCUPANT NO CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 501 N FAIRVIEW ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #199 #199 #199 405-241-04 405-241-04 405-241-04 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 601 N FAIRVIEW ST 651 N FAIRVIEW ST 633 N FAIRVIEW ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #199 #199 #200 405-241-04 405-241-04 939-45-057 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 643 N FAIRVIEW ST 615 N FAIRVIEW ST 2519 W 5TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #201 #202 #203 939-45-057 939-45-058 939-45-058 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2519 W 5TH 5T 2511 W 5TH ST 2511 W STH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 City Council 26 — 558 1/16/2024 #204 #205 #206 939-45-059 939-45-059 939-45-060 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2501 W 5TH ST 2501 W 5TH ST 2617 W 5TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #207 #208 #209 939-45-060 939-45-061 939-45-061 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2617 W 5TH ST 2609 W 5TH ST 2609 W 5TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #210 #211 #212 939-45-062 93945-062 939-45-063 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2601 W 5TH ST 2601 W 5TH 5T 563 N FAIRVIEW ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #213 #214 #215 939-45-063 939-45-064 939-45-064 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 563 N FAIRVIEW ST 559 N FAIRVIEW ST 559 N FAIRVIEW ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #216 #217 #218 939-45-065 939-45-065 93945-066 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 555 N FAIRVIEW ST 555 N FAIRVIEW ST 551 N FAIRVIEW ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #219 #220 #221 939-45-066 939-45-067 939-45-067 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 551 N FAIRVIEW ST 547 N FAIRVIEW ST 547 N FAIRVIEW ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #222 #223 #224 939-45-068 939-45-068 939-45-069 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 539 N FAIRVIEW ST 539 N FAIRVIEW ST 531 N FAIRVIEW ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #225 #226 #227 939-45-069 939-45-070 939-45-070 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 531 N FAIRVIEW ST 527 N FAIRVIEW ST 527 N FAIRVIEW ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #228 #229 #230 939-45-071 939-45-071 939-45-072 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 523 N FAIRVIEW ST 523 N FAIRVIEW ST 2501 W 5TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 #230 #231 #231 939-45-072 939-45-072 939-45-072 CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT CURRENT OCCUPANT 2519 W 5TH ST 519 N FAIRVIEW ST 2609 W 5TH ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 SANTA ANA CA 92703 City Council 26 — 559 1/16/2024 #231 939-45-072 CURRENT OCCUPANT 523 N FAIRVIEW ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #231 939-45-072 CURRENT OCCUPANT 563 N FAIRVIEW ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #234 939-45-074 CURRENT OCCUPANT 511 N FAIRVIEW ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #231 939-45-072 CURRENT OCCUPANT 547 N FAIRVIEW ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #232 939-45-073 CURRENT OCCUPANT 515 N FAIRVIEW ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #235 939-45-074 CURRENT OCCUPANT 511 N FAIRVIEW ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #231 939-45-072 CURRENT OCCUPANT 555 N FAIRVIEW ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 #233 939-45-073 CURRENT OCCUPANT 515 N FAIRVIEW ST SANTA ANA CA 92703 City Council 26 — 560 1/16/2024 RADIUS MAP 10009 SUBJECT PROPERTY ADDRESS: 601 N. FAIRVIEW AVE., SANTAANA, CA92703 AP N: 405-241-04 Map Date: 2/9/2023 Graphic Data Source Orange County Geographic Information System Base Parcel Database (Derived from APN Maps) Coordinate System: NAD 1963 StatePlane California V FIPS O405 Feet Datum: North American 1983 Legend 6 P • III /� �E ` IIIIIIIIIIII, Latest equalized assessment roils obtained from the Orange County Assessor's Office through ParcelQuest, a vendor service on 2/9/2023 /'� 0 250 500 1,D00 (v Feet ORDER NO. 2023-26 IUS MAPS 4 LESS PLANNING + ENGINEERIhIG www.radiusmaps4less.com I (9o9) 997.93s7 City Council 26 — 561 1/16/2024 ORANGE COUNTY REPORTER -- SINCE 1921 600 W SANTA ANA BLVD STE 812, SANTA ANA, CA 92701 Telephone (714) 643 2027 1 Fax (714) 542-6541 Ingrid Canedo VISTA HERITAGE GLOBAL ACADEMY 2609 W. 5TH STREET SANTA ANA, CA - 92703 PROOF OF PUBLICATION (2015.5 C.C.P.) State of California ) County of ORANGE ) ss Notice Type: GPN - GOVT PUBLIC NOTICE Ad Description: Vista Sunshine Meeting Notice I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the State of California; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or Interested In the above entitled matter. I am the principal cleric of the printer and publisher of the ORANGE COUNTY REPORTER, a newspaper published In the English language in the city of SANTA ANA, county of ORANGE, and adjudged a newspaper of general circulation as defined by the laws of the State of Callfomla by the Superior Court of the County of ORANGE, State of Celtfomla, under date 0612011922. Case No. 13421. That the notice, of which the annexed Is a printed copy, has been published In each regular and entire Issue of said newspaper and not In any supplement thereof on the following dates, to -Wit: 05/0512023 Executed on: 051OW023 At Los Angeles, Callfamla I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing Is true and correct. OR#: 3698354 This space far fW" stamp only City Council 26 — 562 1/16/2024 AGENDA SUNSHINE ORDINANCE COMMUNITY MEETING NOTICE Monday, May 15, 2023 1. Welcome & Overview: Collin Fetch, Ed.D., Assistant Super intendent, Vista Heritage Global Academies 2. Vista Heritage Global Academies Santa Ana Project Details: Slides 1-5) Team: Collin Fetch, Ed.D., Assistant Super Intendent, Vista Heritage Global Academies • Introduction to the Vista Organization (Slides 1-2) • Why Santa Ana (Slide 3) • Benefits of converting parcel 4 from what it previously was into what it can/will be. (Slide 4) • How does that benefit the community? (Slide 5) 3. Land Use Team: (Slides 6-7) Vince Fergoso, Principal, The Fergoso Group • Project Details (Slide 6) • Current Zone & use (Slide 6) • Proposed Zone Amendments (Slide 6) • Proposed Use (Slide 6) • Requested Application (Slide 6) • Next Steps & Where we are at (Slide 6) • Parking Distribution per CC & R (Slide 7) 4. Architecture Team: (Slides 8-10) Tony Pacheco -Taylor, AIA, tEED®AP, Studio W Architects, • Updated site plan (Slide 8) • Exterior architectural improvements (Slide 8) ■ Ft' of outdoor areas ■ Architectural features • Upgrades from development (Slide 8) ■ Landscaping ■ Pedestrian • Accessibility ■ Aesthetic — Elevations (Slides 9-10) 5. Traffic Team: (Slides 11-12) Robert Uv, Traffic Engineer, Urban Xroads • Changes to pick up and drop off queue (Slide 11) • Changes in routing to pick up and drop off circulation (Slide 12) City Council 26 — 563 1/16/2024 UNSHINE ORDINANCE SIGN IN SHEET Monday, May 15, 2023 NAME I EMAIL PHONE ^ J i D 1 - #2 u1�. 657+ // �a b1 Y � N b. C�►y)�-!3 -�s33 1N t X ' P'laYY Vvti1m 1gH1 h�4 1 Cl H - e2i -- 76 / S - City Counci 26 — 564 1 /16/2024 V vn CL O � O �— V O o 025 t mo v M L cli � City Council 26 — 565 1/ U_ Z. � C CL O N qj tto 4- a LG) M 4-1-1 12 '� C O 0 to as -v v Q CD U Cn CD N Ln- 0 L O 4-0as o City Council 26 — 566 1 IW V m O O V U N � N O m M R > = -r O O m "5C _ CL N C Q N W O 0 m m O • znv Me ` A4.� - a L � s tl3 � pg c � • as � CL Cg ti v U U iG S a fG JyTY 00 • �, J • Z - 1/16 02 1 .. 1< City Council �Q6 — 567 ivw,3 ;; z;, Q) G O O :N v —Ne m OL- m CL a� O V C Rf 4-+ .0 •� G' 4 a--+ O m V) Q1 cu C O a--+ • v) C O V N - m E ...► CL ,� m C •E � C U v C C .� O CID i \ C C > to `_� V)G COC taA v O cu C O `O Q. m 1O •� C O •� CU 0 O O v E .4 O N O m U C O V O t pU 2 V) U 'a C O `a � <( U Q- W W C: • • • • • City Council 26 - 570 RS m O O O 0 V) 1 /16/2024 86-284292 City Council 26 — 571 1/16/2024 z W W caC J z w z 0 a LLJ w IL b LL I ?A I LL bLL City Council W H 2 = 0 a (_ . . . . . . ..... I , 26 — 574 1 /16/2024 uI D O W Z w (9 Z Q 2 V w Ln O a O W- a .r i I A7FIY 471117Wd fl) 9N1j Wd0) M 0 U 3i r LLJ y Council 26 - 575 1/16/2024 w H O O W IA O a O cc a w H oOc H LU City C :S'�(�,� aY14, --91 mvd (3113) 1 !, 7 26 — 576 I, - 024 u m L Vista Charter Public School Sunshine Ordinance Meeting No. 2 Meeting Notes — May 15, 2023 Follow Up Meeting — May 23, 2023 Q: How will access be provided for our large trucks? A. We are still reviewing options for meeting the school's needs while maintaining truck access. At the follow up meeting on 5/23, Vista presented a new revised a new circulation plan that demonstrated the neighbor's concerns of how larger vehicles moved through the park. The revised plan will be submitted to the city for further review. Q: Will the plans be revised to provide truck access? A: If changes are made, the plans will be revised and will be resubmitted to the city. The plans have since been revised to demonstrate access for larger commercial vehicles. Q: How can you gate off the alley if there are reciprocal easements? A: A review of the easements does not show specific truck easements between the properties, We have a team continuing to review documents related to easements, and the business park should do the same. This issue has been resolved in the redesign reflected in the latest site plans. Q: The truck issue was raised at the first meeting. Why wasn't it addressed? A: The plans for the site are still evolving, and we couldn't address the truck issue until we finalized the site plan for the school. With this feedback, we will be able to address the issue and will have a separate meeting to review the revised plans. The issue has been since resolved and communicated on 5/23. Q: How big is the old auto building/new office building? A: The building is approximately 5,800 square feet in size. The demolished auto mechanic structure was approximately ±11,000 square ft. City Council 26 — 578 1/16/2024 Q: Is the building one or two stories in height? A: The building is one story in height but does contain a small (1,200 square foot) mezzanine. Q: How many will be working in the building? A: Approximately 10 employees will occupy the building. Q: Parking needs to be reverified as there will not be 70 new parking spaces on the north parcel but more like 15. A: The 64 new spaces referred to are the number of stalls on the north parcel that will now be available for the industrial park to utilize. These spaces were previously exclusive to the former automotive uses. Approximately 44 spaces will be new as they will be where the demolished building was located. Q: What is the maximum size of truck that will be studied? A: We will be looking at turning movements for 50-foot long trucks. Q: The 2019 approved SD prohibited outdoor play areas. Why the changes to allow an outdoor play area now? A: A combination of factors such as typical schools have outdoor play areas, families prefer outdoor areas, an lessons learned from covid are led to the decision to pursue an outdoor play area. Q: Our biggest concern besides truck circulation is we can't find a parking spot. A: The revised site plan will provide additional parking opportunities for the industrial park to use. Q: Will this project move forward if we can't address the truck circulation issue? A: We still intend to find a solution that works for all parties. However, the plan will be to move forward if an acceptable option is not found. City Council 26 — 579 1/16/2024 r 86-284222 Exhibit 9 - Parcel Map in Recording 86-284222 C.1--- `4 \ - 4 t�4 � T j T T _Z Cm r_ N gn Ui Q ;'f1FCTi, 41 � 4. der I W r City ounce — - -- 1/16/2024 Order: 58602205755 Page 11 of 11 Requested By: NextAce TPXML Login , Printed: 8/19/2022 8:26 AM Doc: 1986-284222 AGREAS 07-02-1986 ORANGE COUNTY REPORTER --SINCE 1921-- Mailing Address: 600 W SANTA ANA BLVD STE 812, SANTA ANA, CA 92701 Telephone (714) 543-2027 / Fax (714) 542-6841 Visit us @ www.LegalAdstore.com NUVIA OCAMPO CITY OF SANTA ANA/PLANNING & BUILDING AGENCY 20 CIVIC CENTER PLAZA 2ND FLR SANTA ANA, CA 92702 COPY OF NOTICE Notice Type: GPN GOVT PUBLIC NOTICE Ad Description 601 North Fairview To the right is a copy of the notice you sent to us for publication in the ORANGE COUNTY REPORTER. Thank you for using our newspaper. Please read this notice carefully and call us with any corrections. The Proof of Publication will be filed with the County Clerk, if required, and mailed to you after the last date below. Publication date(s) for this notice is (are): 11 /27/2023 The charge(s) for this order is as follows. An invoice will be sent after the last date of publication. If you prepaid this order in full, you will not receive an invoice. Publication Total Daily Journal Corporation Serving your legal advertising needs throughout California ORANGE COUNTY REPORTER, SANTA ANA BUSINESS JOURNAL, RIVERSIDE DAILY COMMERCE, LOS ANGELES LOS ANGELES DAILY JOURNAL, LOS ANGELES SAN FRANCISCO DAILY JOURNAL, SAN FRANCISCO SAN JOSE POST -RECORD, SAN JOSE THE DAILY RECORDER, SACRAMENTO THE DAILY TRANSCRIPT, SAN DIEGO THE INTER -CITY EXPRESS, OAKLAND $146.85 $146.85 (714)543-2027 (951)784-0111 (213)229-5300 (213)229-5300 (800)640-4829 (408)287-4866 (916) 444-2355 (619)232-3486 (510)272-4747 OR# 3760824 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE SANTA ANA PLANNING COMMISSION The City of Santa Ana encourages the public to participate in the decision - making process. We encourage you to contact us prior to the Public Hearing if you have any questions . Planning Commission Action: The Planning Commission will hold a Public Hearing to receive public testimony, and will take action on the item described below. Decision on this matter will be final unless appealed within 10 calendar days of the decision by any interested party or group. Proiect Location: 601 North Fairview Street located within the Light Industrial (M1) zoning district. Project Applicant: Enrique Diaz with Red Hook Capital Partners, LLC (Applicant) on behalf of Vista Heritage Charter Schools (Property Owner) Proposed Project: Applicant is requesting approval of Amendment Application (AA) No. 2023-04 (Zone Change) and Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA) No. 2023-03, to rezone the subject property from Light Industrial (M1) to Specific Development No. 82 (SD-82), expand the boundaries of SD-82 to include the subject property, and to modify SD-82 to allow Administrative Offices as a permitted use and Outdoor Play Areas as a permitted use, ancillary to schools. The requested approvals would accommodate the conversion of an existing 5,837-square-foot industrial building into an administrative office building for Vista Heritage Charter School, and allow an outdoor play area adjacent to the existing school. Environmental Impact: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines, this project is exempt from further review under Section 15301 (Existing Facilities), Class 1 exemption, as it involves negligible or no expansion of an existing or former use. Additionally, the project is also exempt pursuant to Section 15183 (Projects Consistent with a Community Plan, General Plan, or Zoning) of the CEQA guidelines. Notice of Exemption No. 2023-40 will be filed for this project. Meeting Details: This matter will be heard on Monday, December 11, 2023 at 5:30 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 22 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701. Members of the public may attend this meeting in person or join via Zoom. For the most up-to-date information on how to participate virtually in this meeting, please visit https://www. Santa-ana.org/planning-and- bu ildi ng-meeti ng-partici pation/. Written Comments: If you are unable to participate in the meeting, you may send written comments by e-mail to PBAeComments@santa-ana.org (reference the Agenda Item # in the subject line) or by mail to Nuvia Ocampo, Recording Secretary, City of Santa Ana, 20 Civic Center Plaza — M20, Santa Ana, CA 92701. Deadline to submit written comments is 3:30 p.m. on the day of the meeting. Comments received after the deadline may not be distributed to the Commission but will be made part of the record. Where To Get More Information: Additional details regarding the proposed action(s), including the full text of the discretionary item, may be found on the City website 72 hours prior to the public hearing at https:Hsanta- ana.primegov.com/public/portal. Who To Contact For Questions: Should you have any project questions, please contact case planner Fernanda Arias with the Planning Division by phone at (714) 667-2792 or by email at FArias@santa- ana.org. Note: If you challenge the decision on the above matter, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission or City Council of the City of Santa Ana at, or prior to, the public hearing. Si tiene preguntas en espanol, favor de Ilamar a Nuvia Ocampo (714) 667-2732. NeucanlienIacbangtiengVICt, In di g n tho a i cho Tony Lai s 6 (714) 565-2627. 11/27/23 OR-3760824# ' CITY OF SANTA ANA Planning and Building Agency 20 Civic Center Plaza • P.O. Box 1988 Santa Ana, California 92702 www.santa-ana.org/pba NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE SANTA ANA PLANNING COMMISSION The City of Santa Ana encourages the public to participate in the decision -making process. This notice is being sent to those who live or own property within 1000 feet of the project site or who have expressed an interest in the proposed action. We encourage you to contact us prior to the Public Hearing if you have any questions. Planning Commission Action: The Planning Commission will hold a Public Hearing to receive public testimony, and will take action on the item described below. Decision on this matter will be final unless appealed within 10 calendar days of the decision by any interested party or group Project Location: 601 North Fairview Street located within the Light Industrial (M1) zoning district. Project Applicant: Enrique Diaz with Red Hook Capital Partners, LLC (Applicant) on behalf of Vista Heritage Charter Schools (Property Owner) Proposed Project: Applicant is requesting approval of Amendment Application (AA) No. 2023-04 (Zone Change) and Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA) No. 2023-03, to rezone the subject property from Light Industrial (M1) to Specific Development No. 82 (SD-82), expand the boundaries of SD-82 to include the subject property, and to modify SD-82 to allow Administrative Offices as a permitted use and Outdoor Play Areas as a permitted use, ancillary to schools. The requested approvals would accommodate the conversion of an existing 5,837-square-foot industrial building into an administrative office building for Vista Heritage Charter School, and allow an outdoor play area adjacent to the existing school. Environmental Impact: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines, this project is exempt from further review under Section 15301 (Existing Facilities), Class 1 exemption, as it involves negligible or no expansion of an existing or former use. Additionally, the project is also exempt pursuant to Section 15183 (Projects Consistent with a Community Plan, General Plan, or Zoning) of the CEQA guidelines. Notice of Exemption No. 2023-40 will be filed for this project. Meeting Details: This matter will be heard on Monday, December 11, 2023 at 5:30 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 22 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701. Members of the public may attend this meeting in person or join via Zoom. For the most up-to-date information on how to participate virtually in this meeting, please visit https://www.santa-ana.org/planning-and-building-meeting- participation/. Written Comments: If you are unable to participate in the meeting, you may send written comments by e-mail to PBAeComments(a)_santa-ana.org (reference the Agenda Item # in the subject line) or by mail to Nuvia Ocampo, Recording Secretary, City of Santa Ana, 20 Civic Center Plaza — M20, Santa Ana, CA 92701. Deadline to submit written comments is 3:30 p.m. on the day of the meeting. Comments received after the deadline may not be distributed to the Commission but will be made part of the record. Where To Get More Information: Additional details regarding the proposed action(s), including the full text of the discretionary item, may be found on the City website 72 hours prior to the public hearing at https://santa-ana.primegov.com/public/portal. City Council 26 — 582 1/16/2024 Who To Contact For Questions: Should you have any project questions, please contact case planner Fernanda Arias with the Planning Division by phone at (714) 667-2792 or by email at FArias .santa- ana.orq. Note: If you challenge the decision on the above matter, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission or City Council of the City of Santa Ana at, or prior to, the public hearing. Si tiene preguntas en espanol, favor de Ilamar a Nuvia Ocampo (714) 667-2732. Neu can lien lac bang tieng Viet, An dien thoai cho Tony Lai so (714) 565-2627. 1000' RADIUS NOTIFICATION MAP City Council 26 — 583 1/16/2024 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE SANTA ANA PLANNING COMMISSION The City of Santa Ana encourages the public to participate in the decision -making process. This notice is being sent to those who live or own property within 1000 feet of the project site or who have expressed an interest in the proposed action. We encourage you to contact us prior to the Public Hearing if you have any questions. Planning Commission Action: The Planning Commission will hold a Public Hearing to receive public testimony, and will take action on the item described below. Decision on this matter will be final unless appealed within 10 calendar days of the decision by any interested party or group. Project Location: 601 North Fairview Street located within the Light Industrial (M1) zoning district. Project Applicant: Enrique Diaz with Red Hook Capital Partners, LLC (Applicant) on behalf of Vista Heritage Charter Schools (Property Owner) Proposed Proiect• Applicant is requesting approval of Amendment Application (AA) No. 2023-04 (Zone Change) and Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA) No. 2023-03, to rezone the subject property from Light Industrial (M1) to Specific Development No. 82 (SD-82), expand the boundaries of SD-82 to include the subject property, and to modify SD-82 to allow Administrative Offices as a permitted use and Outdoor Play Areas as a permitted use, ancillary to schools. The requested approvals would accommodate the conversion of an existing 5,837-square-foot industrial building into an administrative office building for Vista Heritage Charter School, and allow an outdoor play area I adjacent to the existing school. Environmental Impact.. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines, this project is exempt from further review under Section 15301 (Existing Facilities), Class 1 exemption, as it involves negligible or no expansion of an existing or former use. Additionally, the project is also exempt pursuant to Section 1S183 (Projects Consistent with a Community Plan, General Plan, or Zoning) of the CEQA guidelines. Notice of Exemption No. 2023- 40 will be filed for this project. Meeting Details, This matter will be heard on Monday,i 22 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701. Members oft the 11, 2023 at 5:30 p.m. in the City Zoom. For the most Santa up-to-date information on public may attend this meeting in Council Chambers, how to participate virtual) person ea join via htt s: www.santa-ana.or lannin -and-buildin -meetin - artici ation y In this meeting, please visit Written Comments: If you are le to PB eCom entsPsanta ana ore (reference theAgenda in Itenm44 ini the ou may send written comments b g nda Item Recording Secretary, City of Santa Ana, 20 Civic Center Plaza - subject line) or b y e-mail to to Nuvia San comments is 3:30 p.m. on the day of the meeting.Co Meceivedta Ana. CA 92701. Deadline to submit written Comments r the Commission but will be made part of the record. after t deadline may not be distributed to discireTo rytiMoremaorm ion: on theAdditional Crtyils regarding in the Proposed acton(s), including hours �- ana.primeeoy.com/public/portal. to public the full the heart g at text of the Who To Contact For Questions: Should you have any project questions, please n htt /act _"tt— with the Planning Division by phone at (714) 667-2792 or by email at FArias santanana.or se Planner Fernanda �_�l Arias Note : If you challenge the decision on the above m*f you may be limited to someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written corresgp only those issues you or PlanningCommission or City Council of the city of Santa Ana at, or prior to orres ence ty ty P • th Public heart delivered to e ring. the Si tiene preguntas en espanol, favor de Ilamar a Nuvia ocampo (714) 667_2732 , � t Neu can lien lac bang tigng ViE t, xin di¢n thoai cho Tony Lai so 1714) 565 26Z7 4 il I 26 — mi ui iii inn �d 12 Council 26 — 585 1/16/2024 Ocampo, Nuvia From: Barry Einck <esigndesign@yahoo.com> Sent: Friday, December 8, 2023 4:18 PM To: eComments, PBA Cc: Angie Gmail Cano; Dave Hunt; Scotty Lee; Anh Le; Paola Marrufo; Robin Owens Subject: Opposition to Vista Charter proposal (DP No. 2023-10) Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Hello members of the SA Planning Commission. My name is Barry Einck. My property address is 523 North Fairview. I along with 11 other owners are located on the exact property which is being impacted by the Vista Charter proposal. We are all located within a planned HOA community governed by CC&R and recorded documents that protect the common areas of this community. The recorded Reciprocal Easement Agreement (86-284222) contains the following language, which is in direct conflict with Vista charter proposal: "This agreement allows parking across all parcels." "This agreement explicitly prohibits the construction of barriers, such as fences or walls." When the SD 82 was revised to allow the school to occupy their current location, there was a specific line item added to the zoning, which indicated "no outdoor recreation area would be allowed". I don't understand why that line item is now being ignored, and potentially allowing the school to fence off and occupy common area property for an outdoor recreation area. Please remember, this is a Commercial Business Park, which has typical industrial operations, which are potentially hazardous and dangerous in nature. We have semi trucks, delivery trucks and forklifts operating in the immediate vicinity of the proposed outdoor recreation area. By the removal of additional parking spaces for the use of an outdoor recreation area is going to greatly impact the parking situation in the park and increase the level of danger due to the additional congestion created. Also section 2.2.4 of our association's Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) mentions that the common interest in the Common Area cannot be altered without the consent of all Unit Owners and 75% of first Mortgagees of Units. I know alterations or changes to the Common Area, as presented by Vista Charter School, must adhere to these established rules. I feel that it is very important that the planning commission considers these rules from our HOA recorded documents in making a decision regarding this proposal. Please include this letter to be on file with all of the pertaining information for this planning commission proposal. Thank you for your time and consideration. Regards, Barry Einck 523 N Fairview 714-697-8730 City Council 26 — 586 1/16/2024 Sent from my Whone City Council 26 — 587 1/16/2024 Ocampo, Nuvia From: Angie Cano <angiercano@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, December 6, 2023 2:11 PM To: Carl Benninger; Alan Woo; Isuri Ken nedycommission; ChristopherL@santa-ana.org; jennifero@santa-ana.org; baop@santa-ana.org; manuele@santa-ana.org Cc: Bernal, Sarah; eComments, PBA; Barry Einck; Dave Hunt; Arias, Fernanda Subject: Opposition of Vista's Proposed Project (DP No. 2023-10): Planning Commissioner Meeting on 12.11.23 Attachments: 12.6.23 Opposition of Vista's Proposed Project (DP No. 2023-10) Planning.pdf; 07.02.1986 Agreement of Reciprocal Easement .pdf Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Good afternoon Commissioners, Attached you will find a copy of my opposition letter regarding Vista Heritage Charter School's Proposed of Project (DP No. 2023-10) for your consideration during your Planning Commission meeting on Monday, December 11, 2023 at 5:30pm (There is no agenda yet posted on the city's website). Furthermore, I attached a copy of the association's Agreement of Reciprocal Easements that has been hidden by Vista Heritage Charter in their arguments to build a playground in our association's parking lot. A similar letter in opposition was sent to the three board members of the Civic Center Business Owners' Association today, Wednesday, December 6th since section 2.2.4 of our association's Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) mentions that the common interest in the Common Area cannot be altered without the consent of all Unit Owners and 75% of first Mortgagees of Units. I know alterations or changes to the Common Area, as presented by Vista Charter School, must adhere to these established rules. Please see the attached letter for more details about historical information of our Association. ANGIE CANO BUSINESS ADDRESS: 563 North Fairview St. Santa Ana, CA 92703 CELL: 714.957.5744 ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Angie Cano <angiercanokgmail.com> Date: Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 11:49 AM Subject: Re: Civic Center Board Meeting Notification 12-6-23 5:00 PM To: Danny deLeon Jr. <ddljr@,tcsocal.com>, Scotty Lee <scolee(&,yahoo.com>, Don Wilson <dwilsonAvistacharterp s. org> Cc: Ingrid Canedo <icanedo@redhookcap.com>, Enrique Diaz <ediaz@redhookcap.com>, Dhan Mhaskar <dhanplp(a,gmail.com>, Collin Felch <cfelch(&,,vistacharterps.org>, <nhi.huynh_dds@yahoo.com>, Perla Marrufo <perla@delmayab.com>, Barry Einck <esi_nd�esign@yahoo.com>, Dave Hunt City Council 26 — 588 1/16/2024 <davehuntksensordev.com>, Cutis Tom <tss 1 04kyahoo.com>, John Shen <jshen92kyahoo.com>, Anh Le <anhle0114(cLahoo.com>, Wil Marrufo <wilml94l(d)hotmail.com>, Paola Marrufo <paola@,delmayab.com>, Vince Fregoso <vfregoso@sbcglobal.net>, William Marrufo <william@delmayab.com>, <davehuntsensordev(a-aol.com>, <pvmarrufo@msn.com>, <tlnham4l(a�gmail.com>, <esi ns�designkyahoo.com>, <rhansbergerkhkschoollaw.com>, <marilouksensordev.com>, Mom <hanhbh(&yahoo.com>, <pilyym@,msn.com>, Robin Owens<robinowens(&affinitypropservices.com> Good morning, I realized the file I emailed last night is grainy and so I've attached a clear version of my comments in this email for the Civic Center Business Park Owner's Association scheduled for Wednesday, December 5 at 5pm via Zoom. Please consider these comments during the meeting today. ANGIE CANO BUSINESS ADDRESS: 563 North Fairview St. Santa Ana, CA 92703 CELL: 714.957.5744 On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 10:28 PM Angie Cano <angiercanokgmail.com> wrote: Good evening, I am attaching my comments for the Civic Center Business Park Owner's Association scheduled for Wednesday, December 5 at 5pm via Zoom. Please consider these comments during the meeting tomorrow. ANGIE CANO BUSINESS ADDRESS: 563 North Fairview St. Santa Ana, CA 92703 CELL: 714.957.5744 On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 12:39 PM <Email Alert@calibersoftware.email> wrote: Hi Civic Center Business Owners Association, Attached is the Agenda for the subject meeting with the zoom link below for your convenience. If you have any questions please call Affinity Property Services, Inc. at 714.505.5400. City Council 26 — 589 1/16/2024 Join Zoom Meeting https://zoom.us/j/95928265511 Meeting ID: 959 2826 5511 City Council 26 — 590 1/16/2024 -284222 1�6/oa/$�/ease/gas/air/x�9��ae9/.001 By RMT XMZ=4 TM M G3 RECORDING REQUESTED BY �gHU CA9J AND WHEN RECORDED PAIL TOs JUL IMEL t lCgICKHE`dER 1400 Dove Street �..c Newport Beach, C& 92660 �5. vs rid Attn: a. Z?. Scott Immel, EBq. C6 (Above Space for Recorder s Use Only) AGREEMENT OF RECIPROCAL EASEMENTS THIS AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is made this 17th day Of June , 1986, by CIVIC CENTER BUSINESS PARK PHASE III, � LTD., a California limited partnership ("CCSP°), and CIVIC CENTER BUSINESS PARK OWNERS ASSOCIATION, a California non-profit mutual e� benefit corporation ("Association") with respect to the following facts. R E C I T A L S A. CCBP is owner of the real property located in the City of Santa Aria, County of Orange, State of California, more particularly described as Parcels 3 and 4 as shown on a Parcel I -Tap recorded in Book 198, pages 19 and 20, of PARCEL NAPS, records of Orange County (hereinafter "Parcels 3 and 411). B. Association manages and operates the common area known as Parcels l and 2 as shown on a Parcel Nap recorded in Book. 198, pages 19 and 20 of Parcel Maps (hereinafter "Parcels 1 and 211) and is comprised of all the Owners of Parcels 1 and 2. ORANGE,CA DOCUMENT: AG 1986.284222 Printed on 4/23/2008 8:59:47 AM Provided by DataTrace System Page 1 of 11 City Council 26 — 591 1/16/2024 C. CCBP and Association desire to provide easements over Parcels 1 and 2 and Parcels 3 and 4, such easements being reciprocal, nonexclusive easements for ingress and egress to and from the respective Parcels, as well as easements for parking except on those areas of Parcels 1 and 2 which are Restricted Common Area as defined by the condominium plan and Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions recorded on Parcels 1 and 2. Now, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing facts and the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, CCBP and Association hereby agree as follows: ARTICLE 1 1. B"EMENTS 1.1. CCBP hereby declares as a burden upon Parcels 3 and 4 and for the benefit of Parcels 1 and 2 the following reciprocal easements: 1.1.1. Non-exclusive easements for the purpose of Ingress to, and egress from, public streets or highways over that portion of Parcels 3 and 4 designated for parking and driveway purposes. Such rights shall extend to normal pedestrian and vehicular access but shall exclude any vehicle having a weight, load distribution or wheel type that would not be permitted by applicable laws or regulations upon the adjoining public streets. 1.1.2. Non-exclusive easements for vehicular parking on those portions of Parcels 3 and 4 designated for parking, subject to reasonable regulations and all vehicle code regulations of any appropriate governmental authorities. -2- ORANGE,CA DOCUMENT: AG 1986.284222 Page 2 of 11 Printed on 4/23/2008 8:59:47 AM Provided by DataTrace System City Council 26 — 592 1/16/2024 �_ � � . _ .. � .:�\._:.. -�. �.L+: Y.•': �. �• ' fit::�G.�UM�. 1, i. �n�: i".i}. 1.2. Association hereby declares as a burden upon Parcels 1 and 2 and for the benefit of Parcels 3 and 4 the following reciprocal easements: 1.2.1. Non-exclusive easements for the purpose of ingress to and egress from public streets or highways over that portion of Parcels 1 and 2 designated for parking and driveway purposes, excepting those portions which are designated as Restricted Common Area. Such rights shall extend to normal pedestrian and vehicular access but shall exclude any vehicle having a weight, load distribution or wheel type that would not be permitted by applicable laws or regulations upon the adjoining public streets. 1.2.2. Non-exclusive easements for vehicular parking on those portions of Parcels 1 and 2 designated for parking, except those portions designated as restricted Common Area, and subject to reasonable regulations and all vehicle code regulations of any appropriate governmental authorities. 2. MAINTENANCE. The obligation for maintenance of the parking and driveway areas located on each of Parcels 1 and 2 and Parcels 3 and 4 shall be assumed by the respective owners of the Parcels in question. For purposes of this Agreement, CCHP and Association shall each have the obligation to keep their respective portions of the Parcels in a good and clean condition, including, without limitation, the regular carrying out of customary maintenance and repair of the paved surface thereon, cleaning and removal of refuse and trash and maintenance of appropriate striping ov other designation of parking spaces. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any damage to a portion of the parking area of either owner's property resulting from violation of the use limitation set forth herein, or any other willful or negligent act or failure to act by party required to do so, shall -3- ORANGE,CA DOCUMENT: AG 1986.284222 Page 3 of 11 Printed on 4/23/2008 8:59:48 AM Provided by ®ataTrace System City Council 26 — 593 1/16/2024 ? ^`%•.Ey,t'�K.-''r %t-?dui -_Ye.. ta-P Y $�'a-`'i `S - 1 Y&;r Fi W ',h`t!.• !,I,- :K.. , ; :n�n�.r.. t f. �!.?�,�«t 1:•`>:iC.aL"�x,_.rN,S?�"t.�}� k- 21•C :•< .�3'' 'it'1!dN1 �: �t:"S;'..:'�t!� 867284222 be immediately repaired by and at the sole cost and expense of the party causing such damage. 3. REs` RxcTXoWS-. No hedge, fence, wall or other like barrier shall be erected on the line separating the property owned by CCPB and the property managed by the Association of a nature which would impede pedestrian or vehicular access to either's property. 4. ATo DEDICATIAtdt The easements established in this Agreement are not intended, nor will they create any prescriptive rights in the public. 5. ASSOCIATIO➢!. Aesc_iaticn hereby warrants and represents that it is entering into this Agreement after having taken all appropriate action as required by its Bylaws to obtain the required majority consent, and further acknowledges that the signatures of the owners of at least a 75t voting power of the Association have executed this Agreement in ratification of the Association's action. [Signature Page Follows] -4 - ORANGE,CA DOCUMENT: AG 1986.284222 Page 4 of 11 Printed on 4/23/2008 8:59:48 AM Provided by DataTrace System City Council 26 — 594 1/16/2024 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have enecuted this Agreement this day of.mjm- , 1986 a CIVIC CENTER BUSINESS PARK PHASE III, LTD., A California Limited Partnerships By RICHARD WESTEN, Trustee of the Weston Family Trust dated October 27, 1982, Goner Partner Bye R ERT B11MY DAI , Txmst— nv tfi® Rober - Bivey Dail and Barbara Ann Dail Family Trust dated May 4, 1984, General Partner y�— B"BARA ANN DAIL, Co - Trustee of the Robert Bivey Dail and Barbara Ann Dail Family Trust dated May 4, 1984, General Partner CIVIC CENTER BUSINESS PARR OWNERS ASSOCIATION, a California nonprofit mutual benefit corporation By: Its: %���5 0, 45w�' By: -5- ORANGE,CA DOCUMENT: AG 1986.284222 Page 5 of 11 Printed on 4/23/2008 8:59:48 AM Provided by DataTrace System City Council 26 — 595 1/16/2024 The undersigned hereby acknowledge and affirm ghat they are members of the Association and represent at least 75t of the voting power of the Association and do hereby ratify and affirm the action of the Association hereunder. CIVIC CENTER BUSINESS PARR PHASE III, LTD., A California Limited Partnership By: ICiiARD WESTEN, Trustee of the Weston Family Trust dated October 27, 1982, Genre ,fPartner By :G10O-! BERT BIVEY DA L, CO - Trustee of the Robert Bivey Dail and Barbara Ann Dail Family Trust dated May 4, 1984, Gene al Partner By: BARHARX AHN DAIL, Co - Trustee of tkie Robert Bivey Dail and Barbara Ann Dail Family Trust dated May 4, 1984, General Partner REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST OF CALIFORNIA, a real estate investment trust BY: s)-S;t� Its: By: Its: -6- ORANGE,CA DOCUMENT: AG 1986.284222 Page 6 of 11 Printed on 4/23/2008 8:59:48 AM Provided by DataTrace System City Council 26 — 596 1/16/2024 ;..,.. .. , f , ..;.:.yy-, "`t`: Vtva.•x' .. , ....:u+mv:u.,.. ..a:•r• . ......., .. _.. .. .. C011SENT AND SUBORDXffAT7_Q �I The undersigned, as holder of the beneficial interest in and under those certain Deeds of Trust recorded on January 7, 1986 , as Instrument Nos. 86-006579 and 86-nnfisso all recorded in the Official Records of Orange County, California which Deeds of Trust are by and between CIVIC CENTER BUSINESS PARK PRASE III, LTD., a California limited partnership, as Trustor, and MORTGAGE AND REALTY TRUST; a Maryland real estate Investment trust, as Beneficiary hereby consents to the execution and recordation of this Agreement of Reciprocal Easements and hereby expressly subordinates said Deeds of Trust and its hcannf'i offal interest thereunder to said Agreement. Dated: 2 , 1986. BEiVERICIARY: MORTGAGE AND REALTY TRUST, a Maryland real estate inves=et trust By: �L , OFPICIAI. SEAL 66 JUDITH SIIRILA 0NOTARY PUBLIC - CALIFORNIA STATE OF CALIFORNIA 3 LOS ANGF1Es COUNTY Ss. My cam= enl!es MAR 24. 1989 COUNTY OF LDS ANGELES Y On JU��o�___________, 1906, before me, Judith 5iirila, a Notary Public in and for maid county and state, personally appeared Hayward L. Elliott, known to me to be the President of the Trust that executed the attached instrument, known to me to be the person who executed the attached instrument, on behalf of the Trust herein named, and acknowledged to me that such Trust executed the same. a 1 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto get my hand and affixed cry official seal the day fand �pyear in this certificate first above mitten. dith Siirila (Seal) ORANGE,CA DOCUMENT: AG 1986.284222 Printed on 4/23/2008 8:59:48 AM Provided by DataTrace System Page 7 of 11 City Council 26 — 597 1/16/2024 ORANGE,CA DOCUMENT: AG 1986.284222 Page 8 of 11 Printed on 4/23/2008 8:59:48 AM Provided by DataTrace System City Council 26 — 598 1 /16/2024 6p28 222 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ss. COtTXTY OF ORANGE ) On a 1986, before me, the undersigned, a Notary public in and for said state, personally appeared nil personally known to me or proved to mo on the basis oT satisfactory evidence) to be the President , and Barbara Bann Dali , personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of sat sfactory evidence) to be the Secretar of Civic Center Business Park. owners Assoc at on, the corporation that executed the within instrument on behalf of said corporation, and acknowledged to me that such corporation executed the within instrument pursuant to its bylaws or a resolution of its board of directors. WITNESS my hand and official seal. otary Publ / j O • CIAL $EAL RENE CORTEZ STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) m NOTARY R- CALIFORNIAAOKANGE ORANGE CAtlNTY LOS ANGELES ) SS. My Comm. expires MN 11, 1989 COUNTY OF anw=) On June 25 , 1986, before me, the undersigned, a Notary public in and for said State, personally appeared William Walters Jr. , personally known to me (or proved to me on the basl.s of satisfactory evidence) to be one of the Trustees and , personally known to me (or proved to me on the bass of satisfactory evidence) to be owner of the Trustees of Real Estate Investment Trust of California the trust. that executed the within instrument on behalf of said trusie, and acknowledged to me that such trust executed the within instrument r rsuant to the powers and authority conferred upon and on laehalf of such trust. him WITNESS my hand and official seal. %� kx `&,A Notary Public ORANGE,CA DOCUMENT: AO 1986.284222 Page 9 of 11 Printed on 4/23/2008 8:59:49 AM Provided by DataTrace System City Council 26 — 599 1/16/2024 6728 222 sTATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) On !lone 17 , 1986, before me, the undersigned, a Notary pub! c n and for said State, personally appeared Richard Weston, proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person that executed the within instrument as the Trustee of the Weston Family Trust dated October 27, 1982, the general partner of Civic Center Business Park Phase III, Ltd., a California limited partnership, the limited partnership that executed the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that they executed the within instrument as such general partner and that Civic Center Business Park Phase III, Ltd., a California limited partnership, executed the. same. WITNESS my hand and official seal. If Notary P= L SEAL STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) RENE CORTEZ Ss. NOTARY PUBLIC - CAUFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE ) OfC= ox=piraz MY eommL 1AP1PHY 17, 1989 On , 1986, before me, the undersigned, a Notary public n and for said State, personally appeared Robert Bivey Dail and Barbara Ann Dail, proved to me On the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person that executed the within instrument as the Trustee of the Robert Bivey Dail Family Trust dated May 4, 1984, the general partz�er of Civic Center Business Park Phase III, Ltd., a California limited partnership, the limited partnership that executed the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that they executed the within instrument as such general partner and that Civic Center Business Park Phase III, Ltd., a California limited partnership, executed the same. WITNESS my hand and official seal. /• � VMliI�TAL 5L'f:L RENE CORTEZ IGO 0(yrARy PUSUC - CAUFORNIA �Z0 OFaSIttGE COMM My coma. W[m IM 17. 1M ORANGE,CA DOCUMENT: AG 1986.284222 Printed on 4/23/2008 8:59:49 AM Provided by DataTrace System Page 10of11 City Council 26 — 600 1/16/2024 Q �TITIT ' TIT'IT E ORANGE,CA DOCUMENT: ACC 1986.284222 Printed on 4/23/2008 8:59:49 AM Provided by DataTrace System Page 11 of 11 City Council 26 — 601 1 /16/2024 City Council 26 — 602 1/16/2024 A1I_\N► 1911 Angie Cano and Levi Cano 563 North Fairview St. Santa Ana, CA 92703 Wednesday, December 6, 2023 To the Members of the Santa Ana Planning Commission: Subject: Opposition to Agenda items regarding Vista Heritage Charter School's Proposed of Project (DP No. 2023-10). Dear Commissioners, My father, Levi Cano, and I, Angie Cano, located at 563 North Fairview St., Santa Ana, CA 92703, as concerned members of the Civic Center Business Park, want to express our continued opposition to the proposed construction of fences and a playground proposed by Vista Heritage Charter School and Red Hood Capital Partners in our parking spaces and common areas. The plans to build fences and a playground in our shared spaces will negatively affect our association's character and safety. This opposition is grounded in the historical and legal precedents set forth by our association, as well as the explicit terms outlined in our Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs), and other legally binding documents governing our community. We wish to bring to your attention several key points that directly conflict with Vista Charter's proposal: 1. Restrictions on Erecting Fences (Article VII, Section 7.3 of the CC&Rs, Page 27): On October 18, 2002, Civic Center Business Park Owner's Association's legal counsel determined that unit owners are not permitted to erect a fence or other boundary around any parking space. This directly contradicts Vista Charter's intention to build fences in common areas. We would like to continue to highlight Section 2.2.4 of the CR&R, specifically, the requirement that the common interest in the Common Area cannot be altered without the consent of all Unit Owners and 75% of first Mortgagees of Units. We believe any alterations or changes to the Common Area, as presented by Vista Charter School, must adhere to these established rules. 2. Reciprocal Easement Agreement: The removal of parcels 3 and 4 from the Association in Amendment 1 recorded on January 3, 1986, led to formal arrangements, known as "Agreement of Reciprocal Easements (July 2, 1986, the 'Agreement' Document Number B6-284222)." This Agreement allowed parking across all parcels, including parcels 3 and 4. This agreement explicitly prohibits the construction of barriers, such as fences or walls, that would impede access. Vista Charter's plan would violate this agreement. 3. Unanimous Written Consent of Members Document (June 9, 1993): This document, which repealed previous bylaws and adopted new ones, clearly delineates the shared common areas, including parking spaces, as communal property not owned individually City Council 26 — 603 1/16/2024 but for the enjoyment of all unit owners. The construction of a playground in these areas would infringe upon the rights and privileges of all unit owners. 4. Correction of Terminology misused by Legal Counsel paid for by Vista Charter School: it has been claimed that "Restricted Area" means "Ownership" when Page 4 of the Second Amendment filed in 2016, Section 1.29 gives a straightforward definition of what is a Restricted Common Area: "Restricted Common Area shall mean and refer to those portions of the COMMON AREA." Additionally, section 1.30A mentions "Special Benefit Areas" are a group of one or more Condominiums WITHIN the Project as designated BY THE BOARD that receive services or benefits FROM THE ASSOCIATION that benefit only those Condominiums within such Special Benefit Area rather than all the Condominiums within the Project. The Unit Owners within the Special Benefit Area BEAR THE COSTS incurred by the Association for maintenance, repair, replacement, and provision of services for the benefit of all unit owners within this area. Exhibit D to the Second Amendment establishes MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITIES within the COMMON AREAS of the Association, not Ownership rights to any unit owner. Neither the Second Amendment nor any related board meeting in the discussions suggest that the term "Restricted Common Area" implies ownership. Instead, documents, and board meetings from previous presidents of the Civic Center Business Park consistently focused on maintenance responsibilities. 5. Potential Impact on Community: Beyond legal arguments, the practical implications of Vista Charter's proposed construction are deeply concerning, especially in terms of health and safety. The presence of a Tile and Marble shop directly facing the parking lot, behind the school, involves the use of chemicals that are hazardous, particularly to our youth. These chemicals can include Silica Dust which is generated during cutting or grinding tiles and can lead to respiratory problems if inhaled, Adhesives and Sealants that contain volatile organic compounds (VOCs) which can cause headaches, dizziness, and other health issues, Cleaning Solvents often used in the finishing process, which can be toxic if inhaled without the proper equipment. Supporting a playground in the common area used for parking would in turn support the exposure of children to these substances. A playground in this type of setting would be irresponsible and potentially harmful. In addition to health risks, our common areas serve a crucial role in alleviating parking pressure. This is particularly important given the proximity of both a church and a school in our association. The reduction of available parking spaces and the conversion of these areas into recreational zones and gated areas would inconvenience other unit owners, lead to unsafe congestion, and increase the risk of accidents in non -gated areas. Therefore, we urge the board to consider these facts and the historical context of our community's governance in your deliberations on this matter. We must uphold the integrity of our agreements and the rights of all unit owners to ensure the continued harmony and well-being of our community. City Council 26 — 604 1/16/2024 community's governance in your deliberations on this matter We must uphold the integrity of our agreements and the rights of all unit owners to ensure the continued harmony and well-being of our community Thank you for your attention to this pressing issue We look forward to a resolution that respects our community's rules and values n , - - ngie Cano Levi Cano City Council 26 — 605 1/16/2024 Ocampo, Nuvia From: Alcala, Abigail Sent: Monday, December 11, 2023 3:00 PM To: Ocampo, Nuvia; eComments, PBA Subject: FW: Planning Commission Agenda Item No. 3, December 11, 2023 Hello: The City Clerk's Office received the following comment for the Planning Commission meeting for December 11, 2023. Respectfully, Abigail Y. Alcala, MBA, CMC I Assistant City Clerk City of Santa Ana - City Clerk's Office 20 Civic Center Plaza I Santa Ana, CA 92701 714-647-6520 1 aalcala santa-ana.org City Hall hours are 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. Monday through Thursday, and 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. every other Friday. Click here for a list of observed holidays and Friday closure dates. The mySantaAna mobile app puts the power of the Santa Ana city government in the palm of your hand! The free app allows residents to quickly and easily report issues to the City, access City services, and find news and events. It is available to download from the Apple App Store and on Google Play. Click here to report an issue directly from the City website. From: timrush@bhhscaprops.com <timrush@bhhscaprops.com> Sent: Monday, December 11, 2023 12:21 PM To: eComment <eoomment@santa-ana.org> Cc: Thai, Minh <mthai@santa-ana.org>; Pezeshkpour, Ali <APezeshkpour@santa-ana.org> Subject: Planning Commission Agenda Item No. 3, December 11, 2023 Dear Chairman & Planning Commission Members; I am writing to ask you to support the request of Vista Heritage School in their request for a zone change and related approvals needed to expand their footprint and fully build out their campus at 5t" & Fairview. This is a tremendous asset to the community and to the greater improvement of this area taking a rundown automotive center and making it a center of learning and faith development. Thank you in advance for your careful consideration of this worthwhile change. Sincerely, Tim Rush Wilshire Square Tim Rush Chief People Connector City Council 26 — 606 1/16/2024 Berkshire Hathaway HomeServices California Properties The Maple Building, Corporate Offices 16911 South Bellflower Boulevard Bellflower, CA 90706-5903 (714) 299-4455 17 Branch Sales Offices, Serving 6 Southern California Counties California Propertics City Council 26 — 607 1/16/2024 Ocampo, Nuvia From: Chase Arthur<chasearthur@casalag roupinc.com> Sent: Monday, December 11, 2023 2:14 PM To: eComments, PBA Subject: Vista Heritage Global Academy - 601 North Fairview Street - Air Quality Memo Attachments: Vista Charter -Response to Comment Memo_120823.pdf Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Hi Planning Commissioners, Please see attached for an air quality memo in response to a comment letter by Anige and Levi Cano. Let us know if you have any questions or need any additional information. Thank you, Chase City Council 26 — 608 1/16/2024 We Make e Difference INTERNATIONAL IAltaAllei :1-1110 MIJAlI To: City of Santa Ana Vista Charter Public Schools From: Frances Yau, AICP, Michael Baker International Alan Ashimine, Michael Baker International Date: December 8, 2023 Subject: Response to Comment Letter on Vista Heritage Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project A comment letter prepared by Angie and Levi Cano, dated December 6, 2023, was sent to the Civic Center Business Park Owners Association Board opposing the Vista Heritage Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project (project) and raising several concerns regarding the proposed development. Michael Baker International (Michael Baker) was retained by Vista Charter Public Schools to prepare the environmental documentation under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) for the proposed project. Given our role as environmental consultants, the focus of this memorandum is on Item #5 of the comment letter, as it pertains to potential air quality impacts; refer to attachment. The commenter raises concerns regarding potential health risks to students in the proposed outdoor play field and play yard area from existing operational activities associated with a tile and marble business within the same business park. The commenter states that the business involves the use of chemicals that are hazardous and can include silica dust generated during cutting or grinding tiles, which can lead to health problems for the students. The existing business, NG (New Generation) Tile & Marble, is located at 563 North Fairview Street and is the north end unit within the industrial building to the south of the project site and west of the Vista Heritage Global Academy building. Based on our research and project understanding, operational activities associated with the business would not result in adverse health impacts to future students playing in the proposed outdoor play areas. Specifically, potential marble grinding and cutting activities are performed indoors (i.e., no open air activities in the business park). Therefore, the amount of dust and odor traveling outdoors would be nominal. Moreover, Vista Heritage Global Academy students would spend time outdoors for a limited period of time per day, likely up to one to two hours per day. Health risk is highly dependent on the time exposed to the toxics and one to two hours per day is short-term compared to 24 hours per day considered for typical health risk assessments. Additionally, South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) rules apply to the existing business, including Rule 1113 regulating coatings and tile and stone sealers, and Rule 403 regulating fugitive dust. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) also has regulations on silica exposure for workers. Standard 29 CFR 1926.1153 requires employers to limit worker exposures to respirable crystalline silica and to take other steps to protect workers. Although this regulation is to protect workers, the best practices reduce overall 5 Hutton Centre Drive, Suite 500, Santa Ana, CA 92707 Mice: 472.8373 MBAl<E0Jt L�&KCII 26 — 609 7 dust in the air and would further reduce potential impacts to students in outdoor play areas near the existing business. As such, the indoor operational activities associated with the existing tile and marble business would not result in any substantial health risk to students playing in the proposed outdoor play areas. Further, it should be noted that according to several CEQA court decisions, CEQA analysis is not required to analyze impacts of the existing environment on a proposed project unless the project risks exacerbating existing environmental hazards. California Building Industry Association v. Bay Area Air Quality Management District (2015) 62 Cal.4th 369, Case No. 5213478. Thus, the Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183 — Environmental Documentation, prepared by Michael Baker International and dated December 5, 2023, adequately evaluates the project's potential environmental impacts and findings from the document remain valid. Attachment: Comment Letter, December 6, 2023 City Council 26 — 610 1/16/2024 A1I_\N► 19111 Angie Cano and Levi Cano 563 North Fairview St. Santa Ana, CA 92703 angiercano@gmail.com 714-957-5744 Wednesday, December 6, 2023 Board of Directors Civic Center Business Park Owners Association Board PO Box 131 Trabuco Canyon, CA 92678 Subject: Opposition to Agenda Items - December 6, 2023, regarding Vista Heritage Charter School's Proposed Construction Plans of Fences and Playground in Common Areas. Dear Directors Scott Lee, Danny De Leon, and Don Donald S. Wilson, My father, Levi Cano, and I, Angie Cano, located at 563 North Fairview St., Santa Ana, CA 92703, as concerned members of the Civic Center Business Park, want to express our continued opposition to the proposed construction of fences and a playground proposed by Vista Heritage Charter School and Red Hood Capital Partners in our parking spaces and common areas. This opposition is grounded in the historical and legal precedents set forth by our association, as well as the explicit terms outlined in our Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs), and other legally binding documents governing our community. We wish to bring to your attention several key points that directly conflict with Vista Charter's proposal: 1. Restrictions on Erecting Fences (Article VII, Section 7.3 of the CC&Rs, Page 27): On October 18, 2002, Civic Center Business Park Owner's Association's legal counsel determined that unit owners are not permitted to erect a fence or other boundary around any parking space. This directly contradicts Vista Charter's intention to build fences in common areas. We would like to continue to highlight Section 2.2.4 of the CR&R, specifically, the requirement that the common interest in the Common Area cannot be altered without the consent of all Unit Owners and 75% of first Mortgagees of Units. We believe any alterations or changes to the Common Area, as presented by Vista Charter School, must adhere to these established rules. 2. Reciprocal Easement Agreement: The removal of parcels 3 and 4 from the Association in Amendment 1 recorded on January 3, 1986, led to formal arrangements, known as "Agreement of Reciprocal Easements (July 2, 1986, the 'Agreement; Document Number B6-284222)." This Agreement allowed parking across all parcels, including parcels 3 and City Council 26 — 611 1/16/2024 4. This agreement explicitly prohibits the construction of barriers, such as fences or walls, that would impede access. Vista Charter's plan would violate this agreement. 3. Unanimous Written Consent of Members Document (June 9, 1993): This document, which repealed previous bylaws and adopted new ones, clearly delineates the shared common areas, including parking spaces, as communal property not owned individually but for the enjoyment of all unit owners. The construction of a playground in these areas would infringe upon the rights and privileges of all unit owners. 4. Correction of Terminology misused by Legal Counsel paid for by Vista Charter School: it has been claimed that "Restricted Area" means "Ownership" when Page 4 of the Second Amendment filed in 2016, Section 1.29 gives a straightforward definition of what is a Restricted Common Area: "Restricted Common Area shall mean and refer to those portions of the COMMON AREA." Additionally, section 1.30A mentions "Special Benefit Areas" are a group of one or more Condominiums WITHIN the Project as designated BY THE BOARD that receive services or benefits FROM THE ASSOCIATION that benefit only those Condominiums within such Special Benefit Area rather than all the Condominiums within the Project. The Unit Owners within the Special Benefit Area BEAR THE COSTS incurred by the Association for maintenance, repair, replacement, and provision of services for the benefit of all unit owners within this area. Exhibit D to the Second Amendment establishes MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITIES within the COMMON AREAS of the Association, not Ownership rights to any unit owner. Neither the Second Amendment nor any related board meeting in the discussions suggest that the term "Restricted Common Area" implies ownership. Instead, documents, and board meetings from previous presidents of the Civic Center Business Park consistently focused on maintenance responsibilities. 5. Potential Impact on Community: Beyond legal arguments, the practical implications of Vista Charter's proposed construction are deeply concerning, especially in terms of health and safety. The presence of a Tile and Marble shop directly facing the parking lot, behind the school, involves the use of chemicals that are hazardous, particularly to our youth. These chemicals can include Silica Dust which is generated during cutting or grinding tiles and can lead to respiratory problems if inhaled, Adhesives and Sealants that contain volatile organic compounds (VOCs) which can cause headaches, dizziness, and other health issues, Cleaning Solvents often used in the finishing process, which can be toxic if inhaled without the proper equipment. Supporting a playground in the common area used for parking would in turn support the exposure of children to these substances. A playground in this type of setting would be irresponsible and potentially harmful. In addition to health risks, our common areas serve a crucial role in alleviating parking pressure. This is particularly important given the proximity of both a church and a school in our association. The reduction of available parking spaces and the conversion of these areas into recreational zones and gated areas would inconvenience other unit owners, lead to unsafe congestion, and increase the risk of accidents in non -gated areas. Therefore, we urge the board to consider these facts and the historical context of our City Council 26 — 612 1/16/2024 community's governance in your deliberations on this matter We must uphold the integrity of our agreements and the rights of all unit owners to ensure the continued harmony and well-being of our community Thank you for your attention to this pressing issue We look forward to a resolution that respects our community's rules and values n , - - ngie Cano Levi Cano City Council 26 — 613 1/16/2024 Ocampo, Nuvia From: Chase Arthur<chasearthur@casalag roupinc.com> Sent: Monday, December 11, 2023 11:07 AM To: eComments, PBA Subject: Vista Heritage Global Academy - 601 North Fairview Street Attachments: Cover Letter - Santa Ana Planning Commission.pdf; Hansberger & Klein CC&R Letter.pdf; Akerman - Vista Charter - CC&R Memo 12-8-23.pdf; Stradling Supplemental Letter - CC&Rs.pdf, Stradling - CC&R Review Letter 12.6.23.pdf Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Hi Planning Commissioners, Please see attached documents on behalf of Vista Heritage Global Academy in support of the school's project being heard at tonight's (12/11/23) Planning Commission meeting. The documents attached are a cover letter written by the school's Deputy Superintendent, Collin Felch, along with three legal analyses pertaining to the CC&Rs of the project's site along with a supplemental letter. Let us know if you have any questions regarding these documents. Thank you, Chase Arthur City Council 26 — 614 1/16/2024 akerman Akerman LLP 601 West Fifth Street Suite 300 Los Angeles, CA 90071 T: 213 688 9500 F: 213 627 6342 ATTORNEY CLIENT WORK PRODUCT Memorandum From: Lisa Kolieb, Esq., Akerman LLP To: Vista Charter Public Schools Date: December 8, 2023 Subject: Civic Center Business Park CC&R and Reciprocal Easement Review You have asked us to review the "Industrial Condominium Enabling Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restricted for Civic Center Business Park, Santa Ana, California", dated April 1985, as amended, ("CC&Rs") and "Agreement of Reciprocal Easements," dated June 17, 1986 ("Easement Agreement"), to determine whether the CC&Rs or Easement Agreement prohibit or otherwise restrict the proposed development of a fenced play area for the Vista Charter School within the existing "Buildings A/B Common Area", as defined therein! We understand that the play area is proposed to be located within the Buildings A/B Common Area and additional improvements are proposed on Parcel 4. In short, the CC&Rs only currently apply to Parcels 1 and 2, as Parcels 3 and 4 were removed from the CC&Rs pursuant to the First Amendment to the CC&Rs, approved in December 1985. Accordingly, the improvements proposed on Parcel 4 are not limited by the CC&Rs. However, the play yard proposed within the Buildings A/B Common Area is subject to the CC&Rs. Pursuant to the Second Amendment to the CC&Rs, approved in May 2016, the "Buildings AB Maintenance Area" (which includes the Buildings A/B Common Area) is now considered to be a "Restricted Common Area" for exclusive use by buildings A and B. The CC&Rs, as amended, designated the Common Area as "exclusive" to the owners of Buildings A and B and do not explicitly restrict the permitted uses within the Buildings AB Maintenance Area. Therefore, as long as the proposed use is considered to be "common" to the owners of buildings A and B, there appear to be no 1 This Memorandum only analyzes the CC&Rs and Easement Agreement and does not analyze whether the proposed use is otherwise permissible pursuant to the City of Santa Ana's Municipal Code or previous approvals for the site. This analysis is based solely on our review of the original CC&Rs, as well as the First and Second Amendments to the CC&Rs, as well as the Easement Agreement provided to us by you. Moreover, this memorandum does not constitute a formal legal opinion. akerman.com 7191ify Council 26 — 615 1/16/2024 December 8, 2023 Page 2 restrictions in the CC&Rs on the use of the area for a fenced play area if the owners of Buildings A and B agree on that use for the Common Area. However, the Business Park is also subject to an Easement Agreement which establishes easements over Parcels 1 and 2 and Parcels 3 and 4 for ingress and egress, as well as for parking. The Easement Agreement provides an exception for areas designated as "Restricted Common Area." Since the Buildings A/B Maintenance Area is considered a restricted common area, it should be exempt from the easement requirements. AS ORIGINALLY APPROVED, THE CC&RS REQUIRED THE COMMON AREAS TO BE ACCESSIBLE TO ALL BUSINESS PARK OWNERS, AND ONLY SPECIFICALLY DESIGNATED PARKING SPACES WERE CONSIDERED TO BE "RESTRICTED COMMON AREAS." As originally approved in April 1985, the CC&Rs stated that the "Common Areas" were to be used/accessible by all of the Owners and only specifically designated parking spaces were designated "Restricted Common Areas" that were "set aside for exclusive use of a Unit Owner or Owners.i2 Accordingly, with the exception of those designated parking spaces, all owners were meant to have access to all Common Areas. With respect to use, the CC&Rs stated that "Association, its members, employees, invitees and licensees shall have non-exclusive easements for ingress, egress and parking over the portions of the Common Area containing open space, and parking and driveway areas, except that parking may be restricted in the Restricted Common Area. i3 Under the original CC&Rs, the "Restricted Common Areas" were limited only to "Parking spaces designated "P" followed by the number of the Unit to which appurtenant" and the remainder of the Common Areas were for use by all owners.4 If all of those restrictions were still in place, it could be argued that the proposed play area would not be permitted as the Common Area could not be used for anything other than parking and access and would need to be accessible to all owners. Therefore, it could not be used for a play area and restricted to the use of only one owner. However, as discussed below, the CC&Rs have been amended such that the Common Areas are no longer subject to many of those restrictions. We understand that a neighbor who opposes the proposed project has argued that the CC&Rs restrict the erection of fences with common areas. However, the CC&Rs only explicitly state that "no parking spaces shall be fenced off." (emphasis added). The CC&Rs do not contain other restrictions on fencing with the Business Park. 2 CC&Rs Section 1.29. s CC&Rs Section 6.3. 4 CC&Rs Section 2.2.5. ''' ify Council 26 — 616 1/16/2024 December 8, 2023 Page 3 THE BUSINESS PARK IS ALSO SUBJECT TO AN AGREEMENT RE RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS THAT GRANTS NON-EXCLUSIVE EASEMENTS FOR INGRESS, EGRESS AND VEHICULAR PARKING. The site is also subject to a non-exclusive easement for ingress, egress and vehicular parking pursuant to the Agreement of Reciprocal Easements, dated June 17, 1986. That Easement Agreement establishes easements over Parcels 1 and 2 and Parcels 3 and 4 for "reciprocal, nonexclusive easements for ingress and egress to and from the respective Parcels, as well as easements for parking except on those areas of Parcels 1 and 2 which are Restricted Common Area." Importantly, the easements contain an exception for "portions which are designated as Restricted Common Area." As discussed below, since the entire Buildings A/B Maintenance Area is now designated as an "Exclusive Use Common Area" it should be excluded from the ingress, egress and parking requirements established in the Agreement. The Easement Agreement predates the Second Amendment to the CC&Rs, and was approved prior to the formal separation of Buildings A and B from C and D. Accordingly, any restrictions on fencing between the two areas have arguably been superseded since the Second Amendment explicitly states that the Buildings AB Common Area and all portions of the Buildings AB Maintenance Area have been "set aside for exclusive use" of those buildings. THE SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE CC&RS DESIGNATED THE ENTIRE BUILDINGS A/B MAINTENANCE AREA AS AN "EXCLUSIVE USE COMMON AREA" TO BE USED ONLY BY BUILDINGS A AND B WITHOUT ADDITIONAL RESTRICTIONS ON USE. The Second Amendment to the CC&Rs, effective May 2016, divided the Common Areas for Buildings A and B from the Common Areas for Buildings C and D and reallocated and separated the maintenance obligations and costs for those common areas.5 In other words, the Buildings AB Common Area became the "responsibility" of the owners of Buildings A and B and the Buildings C/D Common Area became the responsibility of the owners of Buildings C and D. Most critical, the Second Amendment explicitly modified the language in the CC&Rs so that the Buildings AB Common Area and Buildings A/B Maintenance Area became a "Restricted Common Area" only for use by Buildings A and B. Specifically, the amendment stated that the "Buildings AB Maintenance Area is hereby set aside and allocated for the exclusive use of the Buildings AB Owner and shall constitute "Restricted Common Area" appurtenant to the condominium rights within Buildings AB. Such Restricted Common Area shall constitute "Exclusive Use Common Area" within the meaning of Section 6550 of the Commercial 'The Second Amendment defines the Buildings AB Common Area as "including exterior landscaping areas, parking areas, driveways and other pedestrian and vehicular access ways, trash enclosures and receptables and exterior lighting within the Buildings AB Common Area..." CC&Rs Section 1.4A. The Second Amendment focuses on the maintenance obligations and expenses as they relate to the Common Areas. However, the Second Amendment did not change the ownership interests in the Common Areas. While the Common Areas may technically have remained under common ownership, the Second Amendment establishes that the Buildings AB Common Area is now allocated for the exclusive use of Buildings A and B. As such, the owners of Buildings C and D arguably no longer have any use or access rights to that area and therefore it would no longer be considered 'common" to all owners. 111' ify Council 26 — 617 1/16/2024 December 8, 2023 Page 4 Association Act."6 As amended, the section of the CC&Rs that discusses the "Restricted Common Area" no longer makes reference to parking spaces, does not require access or use by other owners and does not contain any specific description of the required uses within the Common Area. Accordingly, the CC&Rs, as amended, do not appear to provide any restriction on the use of the Common Area that would prevent the use of the Common Area for a play yard accessible to the owners of both buildings A and B. 6 The exclusive use common area is a section of a common area that is designated for the use of one or more owners, but fewer than all, within a development. ''' ify Council 26 — 618 1/16/2024 VISTA CHARTER PUBLIC SCHOOLS We transform the school experience 2900 West Temple Street Los Angeles, CA 90026 Don Wilson Ed.D., Superintendent T 213 269-4767 1 F 213 269-4762 Collin Felch, Ed.D., Deputy Superintendent www.vistacharterpublicschools.org Karen Amaya, Assistant Superintendent December 8, 2023 To: Planning Commissioners: As you are aware, Vista Heritage Charter School has an item for your consideration at the December 11, 2023 public meeting. I understand that there has been some correspondence to the commission from a couple of the neighboring business park members regarding the allocation of parking at the business complex where we are located, and the access to that parking by Association members. Because our team is committed to working collaboratively with all our neighbors, and because there has been some confusion regarding the legal rights to certain portions of the parking field, we felt it was important to have the Association's CC&Rs reviewed by three different attorneys to provide an unbiased assessment. For your review I have attached the three legal analyses pertaining to the CC&Rs. In summary, the consistent interpretation is that the area where we intend to develop a play field in this proposed project is a restricted common area for the exclusive use of Buildings A & B (Vista & Templo Calvario Church). Please note that I provide this information simply to make sure that the facts are accurately reported. As the Deputy Superintendent our mission is to create a positive school environment for our students and families, and to be an added value to the Santa Ana community. I remain dedicated to this goal. Sincerely, Collin Felch, Ed.D. Deputy Superintendent Vista Charter Public Schools City Council 26 — 619 1/16/2024 4,r kHansberger & Klein December 7, 2023 SENT VIA E-MAIL Dr. Donald Wilson, Superintendent Dr. Collin Felch, Deputy Superintendent Vista Charter Public Schools Re: 2609 W 5TH STREET and Development of Parcels 2 and 4 Conditional Use Permit Application - Civic Center Business Park City of Santa Ana Planning Dept. Case No. 2023-10 Dear Drs. Wilson and Felch: We are submitting this correspondence regarding the above -entitled planning case number. Please submit it as public comment at your planning hearing. You have asked us to provide a non- confidential letter regarding two questions concerning the planned development at the 2609 W. 5th Street facilities (comprised of Parcels 1, 2, 3 and 4). The planned development affects Parcels 2 and 4, specifically. With respect to the Conditional Use Permit Application affecting the Parcels identified above, we have reviewed the original Declaration recorded April 19, 1985 as Document No. 85-240398 of Official Records, the First Amendment to original Declaration recorded January 3, 1986 of Official Records and the Second Amendment to original Declaration recorded August 10, 2016 as Document No 2016-000375684 of Official Records applicable to the formation, management and operation of the Civic Center Business Park (collectively, the "CCRs") by an Association as identified in the CCRs. As a first matter, Parcels 3 and 4 are not part of the Association and are not governed by the Association. Parcels 3 and 4 were deleted from the Association pursuant to the First Amendment to Industrial Condominium Enabling Declaration for Civic Center Business Park. If you refer to Section 1 of that document, it states that "Exhibit `A' is amended by the deletion of Parcels 3 and 4 from the description of the Property." The reference to Exhibit A is to that Exhibit in the original Industrial Condominium Enabling Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Hansberger & Klein, A Professional Law Corporation 27475 Ynez Rd., Suite 357, Temecula, CA 92591 City Counci rica Klein Direct: 1 -2 1-57 5 is ar ans � br Direct 2 -533-1 91 1/16/2024 www.hkschoollaw.com December 7, 2023 Page 2 of 4 Restrictions for Civic Center Business Park (the "Original CC&RS) recorded April 19, 1985 which created the Association. The description of the property also does not include Parcels 3 and 4 in the Second Amendment to Industrial Condominium Enabling Declaration for Civic Center Business Park (see the "Legal Description" in that Second Amendment). Regarding parking, Section 2.2.5 of the Original CC&Rs dedicated certain parking spaces to certain owners by labeling each restricted space with a "P" followed by the unit number. These spaces were reserved for the unit owner's exclusive use. You have informed us that these markers are no longer visible. However, apparently at one time certain spaces were so reserved, which runs contrary to any claims by the Buildings C/D owners that all parking spaces have always been available for all property owners use. The Second Amendment simply clarified further restrictions on the use of Buildings A/B Common Area by Buildings C/D owners. The Second Amendment to Industrial Condominium Enabling Declaration for Civic Center Business Park (the "Second Amendment") of the Original CC&Rs defines "Restricted Common Area" as "those portions of the Common Area, if any, set aside for exclusive use of any Unit Owner, pursuant to Section 2.2.5 below, and shall include the Buildings A/B Common Area and all other portions of the Buildings A/B Maintenance Area." (See page 4 of the Second Amendment.) The Second Amendment defines the `Buildings A/B Common Area" as "those portions of the Common Area located adjacent to Buildings A and B as depicted on Exhibit D attached hereto, including exterior landscaping areas, parking areas, driveways and other pedestrian and vehicular access ways, trash enclosures and receptacles and exterior lighting within the Buildings A/B Common Area, as well as any conduits, pipes, fire and irrigation sprinklers, plumbing lines, wires and other utility installations located outside of Buildings A/B required to provide power, light, telephone, gas, water, sewerage and drainage to the Buildings A/B which exclusively serve Buildings A/B. For purposes of this Declaration, the Buildings A/B Maintenance Area shall constitute Restricted Common Area appurtenant to ownership of the condominium units within Buildings A/B." The Second Amendment defines the `Buildings A/B Maintenance Area" as (a) the roofs, exterior walls, bearing walls, columns, girders, slabs and floors (to the unfinished surfaces thereof) and other structural elements and all other portions of Buildings A/B, (b) fire sprinkler systems, conduits, pipes, plumbing, wires and other utility installations required to provide power, light, telephone, gas, water, sewerage and drainage to Buildings A/B as well as (c) all portions of the Buildings A/B Common Area." Hansberger & Klein, A Professional Law Corporation z nez ui e 357, emecu a, 9z59i ice: -577-0 3 ax: 909-49 City CciC�l www.hkschoollaw.com '� /2024 December 7, 2023 Page 3 of 4 Exhibit D to the Second Amendment pictorially represents the Buildings A/B Common Area and Buildings C/D Common Area. As noted above, Parcels 3 and 4 are not included in the Association anymore. As such, the Buildings A/B Common Area is set aside for the exclusive use of the Buildings A/B Owner pursuant to the Second Amendment. We have included in this letter certain information regarding the financial responsibilities of Buildings A/B and Buildings C/D to each other pursuant to the Second Amendment. It seems clear the intent of the Second Amendment was to relieve both the Buildings A/B and Buildings C/D owners of any financial responsibility for the maintenance costs for each other's respective buildings. Section E of the Preambles to the Second Amendment makes that plain. We can only surmise that the Buildings C/D owners wanted to limit their financial exposure to the maintenance costs associated with Buildings A/B and, to effectuate that goal, essentially "gave up" their respective rights to the Buildings A/B Common Area. Pursuant to the Second Amendment, Buildings C/D owners were relieved of any financial obligation to maintain the Buildings A/B Common Area and, in return, ceded the exclusive use of the Buildings A/B Common Area to the Buildings A/B owners. In my opinion, that appears to be the exchange the Association contemplated by the Second Amendment. By all terms of the OCRs, this agreement, in our opinion, seems fair and reasonable; the Buildings C/D Owners cannot demand to manage the use or operation of the Buildings A/B Common Area without maintaining fiscal responsibility for those areas. We would note that a public comment submitted on or about December 6, 2023 to the commission references a "Unanimous Written Consent of Members Document" apparently dated June 9, 1993. In response, please note the following. First, a unanimous written consent is not a document. It is a certificate memorializing a type of corporate action used to authenticate a document. In any event, the reference to the consent appears to be a unanimous written consent used to update the Association Bylaws sometime in 1993. However, the bylaws were last updated in 2009 so any previous versions are now void. Second, the Bylaws in any event could not override or confer any legal rights separate and apart from the CC&Rs. Whatever map may have been included as an exhibit to the 1993 bylaws are therefore irrelevant as a result. Have included a copy of the 2009 Bylaws as an Enclosure to this correspondence; we received these Bylaws directly from Dr. Wilson who, we can attest, received them from the Association's Property Management consultant. Based on my review of the CCRs, it is our opinion that the owners of Buildings C/D owners do not have any property rights in Parcel 1, Parcel 2 and Hansberger & Klein, A Professional Law Corporation z nez ui e 357, emecu a, 9z591. ice: 577 0 3 ax: 909 49 City CciC�l www.hkschoollaw.com '� /2024 December 7, 2023 Page 4 of 4 Parcel 4 that would impair Vista Charter Public School's right to develop the property and process the Conditional Use Permit Application. If you need anything further, please do not hesitate to let me know. Sincerely, HANSBERGER & KLEIN A Professional Law Corporation Richard J. Hansberger Hansberger & Klein, PLC ENCLOSURES Hansberger & Klein, A Professional Law Corporation z nez ui e 357, emecu a, 9z591. ice: 577 0 3 ax: 909 49 City CciC�l www.hkschoollaw.com /2024 RESTATED BYLAWS OF CIVIC CENTER BUSINESS PARK OWNERS ASSOCIATION CONTENTS ARTICLE I Recitals and Definitions........................................................ 1 Section 1. Name of Association .................................................. 1 Section 2. Association Is Nonprofit . .............................................. 1 Section 3. Specific Purpose ...................................................... 1 Section 4. Definitions.......................................................... 1 ARTICLE II Principal Office...............................................................2 Section 1. Location of Principal Office ............................................ 2 ARTICLE III Membership..................................................................2 Section 1. Members of the Association ............................................ 2 Section 2. Term of Membership .................................................. 2 Section 3. Multiple Ownership of Condominiums ................................... 2 Section 4. Furnishing Evidence of Membership ...................................... 2 ARTICLE IV Membership Voting...........................................................3 Section 1. Single Class of Membership ............................................ 3 Section 2. Member Voting Rights ................................................ 3 Section 3. Eligibility To Vote ..................................................... 3 Section 4. Manner of Casting Votes .............................................. 3 Section 5. Proxies.............................................................3 Section 6. Action by Written Ballot Without a Meeting .............................. 4 Section 7. Cumulative Voting ................................................... 4 Section 8. Election and Voting Rules ............................................. 4 ARTICLE V Membership Meetings..........................................................4 Section 1. Place of Meeting ..................................................... 4 Section 2. Annual Meeting ..................................................... 4 Section 3. Special Meetings ..................................................... 4 Section 4. Notice of Members' Meetings ........................................... 5 Section 5. Quorum Requirements ................................................ 6 City Council -1 26 — 624 1/16/2024 Section 6. Adjourned Meeting ................................................... 6 Section 7. Waiver of Notice or Consent by Absent Members .......................... 7 Section 8. Record Dates for Member Notice; Voting and Giving Consents ................ 7 ARTICLE VI Membership Rights............................................................9 Section 1. Tenants and Lessees .................................................. 9 Section 2. Invitees and Guests ................................................... 9 Section 3. Association Rules and Regulations ....................................... 9 ARTICLE VII Board of Directors...........................................................10 Section 1. General Association Powers ........................................... 10 Section 2. Number and Qualification of Directors .................................. 10 Section 3. Term of Office ...................................................... 10 Section 4. Nomination of Directors .............................................. 10 Section 5. Election of Directors ................................................. 10 Section 6. Vacancies on Board of Directors ........................................ 11 ARTICLE VIII Board Meetings..............................................................12 Section 1. Place of Meetings ................................................... 12 Section 2. Annual Meeting of Directors .......................................... 13 Section 3. Other Regular Meetings .............................................. 13 Section 4. Special Meetings of the Board .......................................... 13 Section 5. Attendance by Members; Common Interest Development Open Meeting Act Provisions ....................................... 13 Section 6. Quorum Requirements ............................................... 14 Section 7. Waiver of Notice .................................................... 15 Section 8. Adjournment.......................................................15 Section 9. Action Without a Meeting ............................................ 15 Section 10. Compensation..................................................... 15 ARTICLE IX Duties and Powers of the Board ................................................ 15 Section 1. Specific Powers ..................................................... 15 ARTICLE X Committees.................................................................16 Section 1. Committees of Directors .............................................. 16 Section 2. Effect of Committee Actions .......................................... 16 City Council - 11 26 — 625 1/16/2024 ARTICLE XI Officers....................................................................16 Section 1. Officers...........................................................16 Section 2. Election of Officers .................................................. 17 Section 3. Subordinate Officers ................................................. 17 Section 4. Removal of Officers .................................................. 17 Section 5. Resignation of Officers ............................................... 17 Section 6. Vacancies..........................................................17 Section 7. President..........................................................17 Section 8. Vice President......................................................17 Section 9. Secretary..........................................................17 Section 10. Chief Financial Officer ............................................... 18 ARTICLE XII Member Assessment Obligations and Association Finances .......................... 18 Section 1. Description of Assessments to Which Owners Are Subject ................... 18 Section 2. Checks............................................................18 Section 3. Operating Account..................................................18 Section 4. Other Accounts.....................................................18 Section 5. Annual Report......................................................19 ARTICLE XIII Other Required Disclosure to Members .......................................... 19 Section 1. Annual Statement of Association's Collection Policy ....................... 19 Section 2. Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) Disclosure ......................... 19 Section 3. Disclosure of Schedule of Fines or Other Monetary Penalties ................. 19 Section 4. Avoidance of Duplication in Reporting Obligations ........................ 19 ARTICLE XIV Miscellaneous...............................................................20 Section 1. Inspection of Books and Records ....................................... 20 Section 2. Robert's Rules of Order ............................................... 20 Section 3. Amendment or Repeal of Bylaws by Directors and Members ................. 20 Section 4. Notice Requirements ................................................. 21 Section 5. Indemnification..................................................... 21 Section 6. Construction and Definitions .......................................... 22 City Council 26 — 626 1/16/2024 RESTATED BYLAWS OF CIVIC CENTER BUSINESS PARK OWNERS ASSOCIATION ARTICLE I Recitals and Definitions Section 1. Name of Association. The name of this corporation is CIVIC CENTER BUSINESS PARK OWNERS ASSOCIATION and shall be referred to herein as the "Association." Section 2. Association Is Nonprofit. The Association has been formed pursuant to the California Nonprofit Mutual Benefit Corporation Law (Corporations Code sections 7110-8970) as a nonprofit mutual benefit corporation. Section 3. Specific Purpose. The specific and primary purposes of this Association are set forth within the Association's Articles of Incorporation. Section 4. Definitions. (a) County. The term "County" means the County of Orange, State of California. (b) Declaration. The term "Declaration" means all restrictions, covenants, terms and conditions set forth in the Industrial Condominium Enabling Declaration of Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions recorded in the Office of the Orange County Recorder with respect to the Properties as Instrument No. 85-140398, Official Records of said County, as such Declaration may from time to time be supplemented, amended or modified by a subsequent Declaration, or amendment thereto, duly recorded in said Recorder's Office. (c) Majority of a Quorum. "Majority of a Quorum" means the vote of a majority of the votes cast at a meeting or by written ballot when the number of Members attending the membership meeting or the number of written ballots cast equals or exceeds the quorum requirement specified in Article V, Section 5, below. In the case of membership meetings, the voting power of a particular Member may be represented at the meeting by proxy (see Article IV, Section 6, below). Voting rights are set forth within Article III, Section 3.4 and Exhibit "B" of the Declaration. (d) Office of the Recorder. The term "Office of the Recorder" means the Office of the Recorder, County of Orange, State of California. (e) Person. The term "Person" means and includes any individual, corporation, partnership, association or other entity recognized by the laws of the State of California. -I- City Council 26 — 627 1/16/2024 (f) Voting Power. The term "Voting Power" means those Members who are eligible to vote for the election of Directors or with respect to any other matter, issue, or proposal properly presented to the Members for approval at the time any determination of voting power is made. (g) Definitions Incorporated by Reference. The terms defined in the Declaration shall have the same meaning when used herein unless the context clearly indicates a contrary intention. ARTICLE II Principal Office Section 1. Location of Principal Office. The principal office of the Association will be located at such place within the County as the Board may from time to time designate by resolution. ARTICLE III Membership Section 1. Members of the Association. Every Owner of a Condominium within the Properties is a Member of the Association. Membership in the Association is appurtenant to, and may not be separated from, ownership of any Condominium. Section 2. Term of Membership. Each Owner who is a Member shall remain a Member until he or she no longer qualifies as such under Article III, Section 1, above. Upon the sale, conveyance or other transfer of an Owner's interest in a Condominium, the Owner's membership interest appurtenant to the Condominium shall automatically transfer to the Unit's new Owner(s). Section 3. Multiple Ownership of Condominiums. Ownership of a Condominium shall give rise to a single membership vote in the Association. Accordingly, if more than one person owns a Condominium, all of these persons shall be deemed to be one Member for voting purposes, although all such Owners shall have equal rights as Members to use and enjoy the Common Areas and Common Facilities. The Secretary of the Association shall be notified in writing of the Owner designated by his or her Co -Owners as having the sole right to vote the membership on their behalf. If no such notification is received the secretary may accept the vote of any Owner of Record or proxy holder of such an Owner as the vote attributable to the Condominium in question, provided that if the multiple Owners of a Condominium attempt to vote the membership attributable to said Condominium in an inconsistent fashion, the Secretary or other person or persons designated as inspectors of election by the Board of Directors may refuse to count any ballot pertaining to the Condominium. Section 4. Furnishing Evidence of Membership. The Secretary may request a Member to provide evidence of qualification to vote in the form of a copy of a recorded grant deed (certified by the Office of the Recorder) or a currently effective policy of title insurance. Exercise of membership rights shall be further subject to the rules regarding record dates for notice, voting, and actions by ballot and eligibility for voting set forth in Article V, Section 4. -2- City Council 26 — 628 1/16/2024 ARTICLE IV Membership Voting Section 1. Single Class of Membership. The Association shall have one class of voting membership, designated Class A, as described within Article III, Section 3.4.1 of the Declaration. Section 2. Member Voting Rights. On each matter submitted to a vote of the Members, whether at a meeting of the membership called and held pursuant to the provisions of these Bylaws or otherwise, each Member shall be entitled to cast votes as described within Article III, Section 3.4 of the Declaration. Single memberships in which two or more persons have an indivisible interest shall be voted as provided in Article III, Section 3 of these Bylaws. Section 3. Eligibility To Vote. Only Members in good standing shall be entitled to vote on any issue or matter presented to the Members for approval. In order to be in good standing, a Member must be current in the payment of all assessments levied against the Member's Condominium and not be subject to any suspension of voting privileges as a result of any disciplinary proceeding conducted in accordance with the Declaration. A Member's good standing shall be determined as of the record date established in accordance with Article V, Section 8. The Association shall not be obligated to conduct a hearing in order to suspend a Member's voting privileges on the basis of the nonpayment of assessments, although a delinquent Member shall be entitled to request such a hearing in accordance with the Declaration. A Member who owns more than one Condominium shall be ineligible to vote if that Member is delinquent with respect to any such Condominiums. Section 4. Voting at Membership Meetings/Effect of Civil Code Sections 1363.03 and 1363.04. With the exception of voting concerning assessments, recall or election of Board members, amendments to the governing documents, or the grant of exclusive use of Common Area pursuant to Civil Code Section 1363.07 (collectively "Secret Ballot Topics"), voting at any membership meeting may be by voice or by ballot. Membership voting on Secret Ballot Topics shall be conducted as set forth within Civil Code Section 1363.03. In the event of any inconsistency between these Bylaws and Civil Code Sections 1363.03 and 1363.04, or any comparable successor statutes, the Civil Code Sections shall control. Section 5. Voting by Corporations Code Section 7513 Written Ballot Procedure. Any matter or issue requiring the vote of the Members, other than Secret Ballot Topics, may be submitted to vote by Written Ballot without the necessity of calling a meeting of the Members, so long as the requirements for action by Written Ballot set forth in this Section are met. A written ballot is a ballot which is mailed or otherwise distributed to every Member entitled to vote on the matter and which complies with the requirements of this Section. The term "Written Ballot" does not include a ballot distributed at a meeting for purposes of conducting a vote of the Members at such meeting. The determination to seek Member approval for Association actions in this fashion shall be made by a majority vote of the Board or by Members possessing five percent (5%) of the voting power of the Association signing a written request that a proposal be presented to the Members for a vote by Written Ballot and delivering this request to the President, Vice President, or Secretary of the Association. If a request for a vote by Written Ballot is received from the Members, the officer receiving the request shall cause notice to be properly given to the Members entitled to vote, in accordance with the meeting and notice -3- City Council 26 — 629 1/16/2024 provisions of these Bylaws, and the fact that a meeting will be held and the date, time, and purpose of such meeting, which date shall not be less than thirty-five (35) nor more than ninety (90) days following receipt of the request. Section 6. Proxy Voting. At all meetings of Members, Members otherwise eligible to vote a meeting may do so in person or by proxy provided the proxy is prepared and executed in compliance with all applicable statutes. Every proxy shall be revocable and shall automatically cease upon conveyance by the Member of his/her Condominium Unit. Section 7. Cumulative Voting. Cumulative voting shall not be permitted. Section 8. Election and Voting Rules. The Board of Directors shall adopt election and voting rules pursuant to Civil Code Section 1363.03. ARTICLE V Membership Meetings Section 1. Place of Meeting. Meetings of the Members shall be held at a reasonable place within the County and at such time as may be designated by the Board in the notice of the meeting. Section 2. Annual Meeting. There shall be an annual meeting of the Members in November of each year. The date, time, and location of the meeting shall be established by the Board and set forth in the notice of meeting sent to the Members. Section 3. Special Meetings. (a) Persons Entitled To Call Special Meetings. A majority of the Board, the President or 5 percent or more of the Members may call special meetings of the Members at any time to consider any lawful business of the Association. (b) Procedures for Calling Special Meetings Requested by Members. If a special meeting is called by Members other than the Board of Directors or President, the request shall be submitted by such Members in writing, specifying the general nature of the business proposed to be transacted, and shall be delivered personally or sent by registered mail or by telegraphic or other facsimile transmission to the President, any Vice President, or the Secretary of the Association. The officer receiving the. request shall cause notice to be promptly given to the Members entitled to vote, in accordance with the provisions of this Section 3, that a meeting will be held, and the date, time, and purpose for such meeting, which date shall be not less than 35 nor more than 90 days following the receipt of the request. If notice of the meeting is not given within 20 days after receipt of the request, the persons requesting the meeting may give the notice. Nothing contained in this subsection shall be construed as limiting, fixing, or affecting the time when a meeting of Members may be held when the meeting is called by action of the Board of Directors or the President. City Council 26 — 630 1/16/2024 Section 4. Notice of Members' Meetings. (a) Requirement That Notice Be Given. Notice of all regular and special meetings of the Members shall be sent or otherwise given in writing to each Member who is eligible to vote at the meeting as of the record date for notice established in accordance with Article V, Section 8. (b) Time Requirements for Notice. The notice of membership meetings shall be given in the manner specified in subparagraph (e) of this Section 4, not less than 10 nor more than 90 days before the date of the meeting. If notice is given by mail and the notice is not given by first-class, registered, or certified mail, the notice shall be given not less than 20 days (nor more than 90 days) before the meeting. (c) Minimum Requirements Regarding Content of Notice. The notice of any membership meeting shall specify the place, date, and hour of the meeting. In the case of a special meeting, the notice shall also state the general nature of the business to be transacted, and no other business may in that case be transacted at the special meeting. In the case of a regular meeting, the notice shall also describe those matters that the Board of Directors, at the time of giving the notice, intends to present for action by the Members; but any proper matter may be presented at the meeting for such action so long as a quorum is present. The notice of any meeting at which directors are to be elected shall include the names of all those individuals who are nominees at the time the notice is given to the Members. (d) Specification of Certain Significant Actions. If any action is proposed to be taken at any membership meeting for approval of any of the following proposals, the notice shall also state the general nature of the proposal. Member action on such items is invalid unless the notice or written waiver of notice or consent states the general nature of the proposal(s): (i) Removing a director without cause; (ii) Filling vacancies on the Board of Directors under those circumstances where a vote of the Members is required pursuant to Article VII, Section 6 of these Bylaws; (iii) Amending the Articles of Incorporation of this Association, these Bylaws or the Declaration in any manner requiring approval of the Members; (iv) Approving a contract or transaction between the Association and one or more of its directors, or between the Association and any corporation, firm, or association in which one or more of its directors has a material financial interest; (v) Approving any change in the Association's assessments in a manner requiring membership approval under the Declaration; or (vi) Voting upon any election to voluntarily terminate and dissolve the Association. (e) Manner of Service. Notice of any meeting of Members shall be given either personally or by first-class mail, facsimile, or other written communication, charges prepaid, addressed to each -5- City Council 26 — 631 1/16/2024 Member either at the address of that Member appearing on the books of the Association or the address given by the Member to the Association for the purpose of notice. Notice shall be deemed to have been given at the time when the notice is delivered as provided within Civil Code Section 1350.7. (f) Affidavit of Mailing. An affidavit of the mailing or other means of giving any notice of any Members' meeting may be executed by the Secretary or the Assistant Secretary of the Association shall constitute prima facie evidence of the giving of notice. Section 5. Quorum Requirements. (a) Quorum Requirements Generally. The following quorum requirements must be satisfied in order to take valid action at any meeting of the Members or by ballot in accordance with Article IV of these Bylaws: (i) Quorum for Votes on Assessment Increases. In the case of any membership meeting or written ballot called or conducted for the purpose of voting on assessment increases requiring membership approval (see Article IV of the Declaration), the quorum requirement for valid action on the proposal shall be the percentage specified in Civil Code Section 1366 or comparable superseding statute. That quorum percentage is currently a majority of the voting power. (ii) Quorum for Valid Action on Other Matters. In the case of a membership meeting or ballot called or conducted for any other purpose, the quorum shall be 50 percent of the voting power represented in person, ballot or by proxy. (iii) Reduction in Quorum Percentage for Action on Other Matters. If the minimum quorum percentage specified in subparagraph (a)(ii), above, is not satisfied after the meeting may be adjourned to another time and/or place not more than 30 days after the initial meeting date (see Article V, Section 6, below) and at the reconvened meeting the quorum percentage shall be reduced to 33/3 percent of the voting power of the Members. (b) Members Represented by Proxy. Members present at a membership meeting in person, by ballot or by proxy shall be counted toward satisfaction of the quorum requirements specified herein. (c) Effect of Departure of Members From Meeting. The Members present in person or by proxy at a duly called or duly held meeting at which a quorum is present may continue to transact business until adjournment, notwithstanding the withdrawal of enough Members to leave less than a quorum, so long as any action taken (other than adjournment) is approved by at least a majority of the Members required to constitute a quorum. If a quorum is never established for the meeting, a majority of those Members who are present in person or by proxy may vote to adjourn the meeting for lack of a quorum, but no other action may be taken or business transacted. Section 6. Adjourned Meeting. (a) Adjournment Generally. Any Members' meeting, annual or special, whether or not a quorum is present, may be adjourned to another place and/or time (but not for more than 45 days) by US City Council 26 — 632 1/16/2024 the vote of the majority of Members present at the meeting either in person or by proxy. Unless there is an absence of a quorum (in which case no business other than adjournment may be transacted), the reconvened meeting may take any action that might have been transacted at the original meeting. (b) Notice Requirements for Adjourned Meetings. When a Members' meeting is adjourned to another time or place, notice need not be given of the new meeting if the time and place thereof are announced at the meeting at which the adjournment is taken. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if after adjournment a new record date (see Article V, Section 8), is fixed for notice or voting, a notice of the rescheduled meeting must be given to each Member who on the record date for notice of the meeting is entitled to vote thereat. Section 7. Waiver of Notice or Consent by Absent Members. (a) Waivers and Consents Generally. If decisions are made or an action is otherwise taken by the Members at a meeting where a quorum is present, but for which proper notice was not given to all Members for whatever reason, the decisions or actions made at that meeting will be valid if, either before or after the meeting, each person entitled to vote who was not present at the meeting in person or by proxy consents to the meeting by signing (i) a written waiver of notice, (ii) a consent to holding the meeting, or (iii) an approval of the minutes. The waiver of notice or consent need not specify the purpose or general nature of business to be transacted at such meeting unless action was taken or is proposed to be taken at the meeting with respect to any matters specified in Article V, Section 4(d), in which case, the waiver of notice or consent must state the general nature of such matter(s). All such waivers, consents, or approvals shall be filed with the Association records or be made part of the minutes of the meeting. (b) Effect of a Member's Attendance at a Meeting. Attendance by a Member or his or her proxy holder at a meeting shall also constitute a waiver of any objections such person may have with respect to notice of that meeting, except when the Member or proxy holder attends the meeting for the sole purpose of objecting at the beginning of the meeting to the transaction of any business because of the inadequacy or illegality of the notice. Attendance at a meeting is not a waiver of any right to object to the consideration of matters not included in the notice of the meeting that are required to be described therein pursuant to Article V, Section 4(d), if that objection is expressly made at the meeting. Section 8. Record Dates for Member Notice; Voting and Giving Consents. (a) Record Dates Established by the Board of Directors. For the purpose of determining which Members are entitled to receive notice of any meeting, vote, act by written ballot without a meeting, or exercise any rights in respect to any other lawful action, the Board of Directors may fix, in advance, a "record date" and only Members of record on the date so fixed are entitled to notice, to vote, or to take action by written ballot or otherwise, as the case may be, notwithstanding any transfer of any membership on the books of the Association after the record date, except as otherwise provided in the Articles of Incorporation, by agreement, or in the California Nonprofit Mutual Benefit Corporation Law. The record dates established by the Board pursuant to this Section shall be as follows: -7- City Council 26 — 633 1/16/2024 (i) Record Date for Notice of Meetings. In the case of determining those Members entitled to notice of a meeting, the record date shall be no more than 90 nor less than 10 days before the date of the meeting; (ii) Record Date for Voting. In the case of determining those Members entitled to vote at a meeting, the record date shall be no more than 60 days before the date of the meeting; (iii) Record Date for Action by Written Ballot Without Meeting. In the case of determining Members entitled to cast written ballots, the record date shall be no more than 60 days before the day on which the first written ballot is mailed or solicited; and (iv) Record Date for Other Lawful Action. In the case of determining Members entitled to exercise any rights in respect to other lawful action, the record date shall be no more than 60 days prior to the date of such other action. (b) Failure of Board to Fix a Record Date. If the Board, for any reason, fails to establish a record date, the following rules shall apply: (i) Record Date for Notice of Meetings. The record date for determining those Members entitled to receive notice of a meeting of Members shall be the business day preceding the day on which notice is given, or, if notice is waived, the business day preceding the day on which the meeting is held. (ii) Record Date for Voting. The record date for determining those Members entitled to vote at a meeting of Members shall be the day of the meeting, or in the case of an adjourned meeting, the day of the adjourned meeting. (iii) Record Date for Action by Written Ballot Without Meeting. The record date for determining those Members entitled to vote by written ballot on proposed Association actions without a meeting, when no prior action by the Board has been taken, shall be the day on which the first written ballot is mailed or solicited. When prior action of the Board has been taken, it shall be the day on which the Board adopts the resolution relating to that action. (iv) Record Date for Other Lawful Action. The record date for determining those Members entitled to exercise any rights in respect to any other lawful action shall be Members at the close of business on the day on which the Board adopts the resolution relating thereto, or the 60th day prior to the date of such other action, whichever is later. (v) "Record Date" Means as of Close of Business. For purposes of this subparagraph (b) a person holding a membership as of the close of business on the record date shall be deemed the Member of record. City Council 26 — 634 1/16/2024 ARTICLE VI Membership Rights Subject to the provisions hereof and the provisions of the Declaration, the Members shall have the following rights: Section 1. Tenants and Lessees. (a) Assignment of Rights Generally. Each Member shall have the right to assign his or her rights as a Member (other than voting rights) to a tenant residing within the Member's Unit. Such assignment shall be effective only so long as said tenant is residing in said Unit and is in compliance with the Declaration and the Association's Rules in effect at that time. At all times the Owner shall remain responsible for compliance by Owner's lessee or tenant with the provisions of the Governing Documents. Without limiting the foregoing, reference is specifically made to Article VII of the Declaration for additional use restrictions affecting Tenants and leases. (b) Effectiveness of Assignment. Assignment of an Owner's right to use the Common Facilities (other than roads) to a tenant or lessee shall not be effective until such time as the Owner -Member has given the Secretary written notice thereof setting forth the name of the assignee who will be entitled to the use and enjoyment of the Common Areas, and roads within the Properties by virtue of the assignment. (c) Restriction on Lessor's Use of Certain Common Areas and Facilities. During the period of any lease or rental of a Condominium, any Owner not operating a business within the Properties shall not be entitled to use the Common Areas or Common Facilities (other than roads) except to the extent reasonably necessary to perform the usual responsibilities of a landlord or to ensure or gain compliance by the tenant with the requirements of these Bylaws and of the Declaration, unless the Lessor -Owner is contemporaneously operating a business in another Condominium within the Properties. Section 2. Invitees and Guests. The invitees and guests of a Member shall have the right to use and enjoy the Common Areas, and roads within the Properties. Any such guest or invitee shall be subject to the same obligations imposed on the Owner to observe the rules, restrictions, and regulations of the Association as set forth in the Governing Documents. Section 3. Association Rules and Regulations. The right of any person to use and enjoy the Common Areas shall at all times be subject to the rules, limitations, and restrictions set forth herein, in the Declaration, and in the Association's published Rules and Regulations as promulgated by the Board from time to time. With the exception of the right of use of any roads, the Board shall have the right to impose monetary penalties or to suspend the use and enjoyment of any Common Area for the failure of a Member to pay any Assessments when due under the Declaration, or to comply with any other rule or regulation imposed upon such Member, his or her tenants or guests, pursuant to the Governing Documents, provided, however, that any such suspension shall be imposed only after such person has been afforded the notice and hearing rights more particularly described in the Declaration. N City Council 26 — 635 1/16/2024 ARTICLE VII Board of Directors Section 1. General Association Powers. Subject to the provisions of the California Nonprofit Mutual Benefit Corporation Law, the Davis -Stirling Common Interest Development Act (Civil Code sections 1350-1373) and any limitations in any of the Governing Documents relating to action required to be approved by the Members, the business and affairs of the Association shall be vested in and exercised by the Association's Board of Directors. Subject to the limitations expressed in Article X, Section 1, the Board may delegate the management of the activities of the Association to any person or persons, management company, or committee, provided that notwithstanding any such delegation the activities and affairs of the Association shall continue to be managed and all Association powers shall continue to be exercised under the ultimate direction of the Board. Section 2. Number and Qualification of Directors. The Board of Directors shall consist of three (3) persons who shall be Owners of Condominiums whose memberships are in good standing with all Assessments current and are not subject to any suspension of membership rights. Only one representative per Condominium shall be eligible to serve on the Board at any time. In the case of an Owner not a natural person, the representative shall be a natural person who is an officer, agent, director, partner, or other person designated in writing by the Owner to be the Owner's representative. Section 3. Term of Office. Each director, including a director elected to fill a vacancy or elected at a special meeting of members, shall hold office for a term of one year and until a successor director has been elected and qualified. There shall be no limitation on the number of consecutive terms to which a director may be reelected. Section 4. Nomination of Directors. Individuals can become candidates for election to the Board of Directors in any of the following ways: (a) Submission of Candidate Application. Any Member who meets all required qualifications to serve on the Board of Directors may submit a candidate application by the established deadline for submitting such applications. (b) Nominations From the Floor. Any Member present in person or by proxy at a meeting to elect directors may place names in nomination. (c) Good Standing Requirement for Candidacy. To be eligible for nomination and election to the Board, or to designate a representative, an Owner must be certified by the Association Secretary to be in good standing with the Association and current in the payment of Assessments both at the time his or her name is placed in nomination and as of the election date. Section 5. Election of Directors. (a) Directors Elected at Annual Meeting. The annual meeting shall be held in November. At each annual meeting of the Members, the Members shall elect persons to those positions on the Board of Directors held by directors whose terms are then expiring. The persons thus elected shall be selected -10- City Council 26 — 636 1/16/2024 from among those persons nominated pursuant to Article VII, Section 4; however, if for any reason an annual meeting is not held or the directors are not elected at any annual meeting, the directors may be elected at any special meeting of the Members held for that purpose. As more particularly provided in Article IV, Section 7, cumulative voting is not permitted. (b) Determination of Election Results and Succession to Office. The candidates receiving the highest number of votes, up to the number of directors to be elected, shall be elected as directors and shall take office immediately following their election. In the event there is a tie vote between those candidates who receive the lowest number of votes necessary to qualify the candidate for election, the tie shall be broken by lot. Section 6. Vacancies on Board of Directors. (a) Vacancies Generally. A vacancy or vacancies in the Board of Directors shall be deemed to exist on the occurrence of any of the following: (i) the death, resignation, or removal of a director under paragraphs (c) and (d) below; (ii) an increase of the authorized number of directors; or (iii) the failure of the Members, at any meeting of Members at which any director or directors are to be elected, to elect the number of directors to be elected at such meeting. (b) Resignation of Directors. Except as provided in this paragraph, any director may resign, and such resignation shall be effective on giving written notice to the President, the Secretary, or the Board of Directors, unless the notice specifies a later time for the resignation to become effective. If the resignation of a director is effective at a future time, the Board of Directors may elect a successor to take office when the resignation becomes effective. (c) Authority of Board to Remove Directors. The Board of Directors shall have the power and authority to remove a director and declare his or her office vacant if he or she (i) has been declared of unsound mind by a final order of court; (ii) has been convicted of a felony; (iii) has been found by a final order or judgment of any court to have breached any duty under Corporations Code sections 7233- 7236 (relating to the standards of conduct of directors); (iv) has failed to meet any qualification requirement which existed at the time the director was elected; or (v) fails to attend three (3) consecutive regular meetings of the Board of Directors that have been duly noticed in accordance with California law. (d) Authority of Members to Remove Directors. Except as otherwise provided in subparagraphs(s) (c) and (e) of this Article VII, Section 6, a director may be removed from office prior to expiration of his or her term only by the affirmative vote of a majority of the voting power of the Members. Any membership action to recall or remove a director shall be conducted in accordance with the following procedures: (i) A petition must be presented in person to the President, Vice President, or Secretary of the Association and must carry the signatures of Members in good standing who represented at least 5 percent of the voting power of the membership. Such petition must set forth the reason(s) the petitioners are seeking the director's removal; the signature and Lot number(s) of each petitioner in his or her own handwriting; the name(s) of the sponsor(s) of the petition; and must fulfill all other requirements of law. -11- City Council 26 — 637 1/16/2024 (ii) Within 20 days after receipt of such petition, the Board shall either call a special meeting or announce the procedures for conducting a written ballot of the Members to vote upon the requested recall. Such meeting or written ballot shall be conducted not less than 35 nor more than 90 days after the petition is presented. If the Board fails to set a date for, and give the Members notice of, such meeting or written ballot within 20 days, the Members initiating the petition may call such meeting on their own initiative without Board approval or sanction. (iii) The director whose removal is being sought shall have the right to rebut the allegations contained in the petition orally, in writing, or both. If the rebuttal is in writing, it shall be mailed by the Association or otherwise provided to all Members, together with the recall ballot. (iv) If the quorum requirement for a valid membership action is not satisfied or if the recall vote results in a tie, the removal action will have failed. (e) Removal by Court Action. The County Superior Court may, in response to a suit filed by any director or the lesser of 20 Members or 5 percent of the Members, remove any director determined to be guilty of fraudulent or dishonest acts or gross abuse of authority or discretion with reference to the Association. The Association shall be made a party to any such action. (f) Filling Vacancies. Vacancies on the Board of Directors shall be filled by a majority vote of the remaining directors though less than a quorum, or by a sole remaining director unless the vacancy is created through removal of a director, in which case the vacancy shall be filled by the affirmative vote of a majority of the Members represented in person or by proxy at a duly held meeting of the Members at which a quorum is present. The Members may elect a Director or Directors at any time to fill any vacancy or vacancies not filled by the Directors by an election at a duly held meeting of the Members or written ballot and shall require the approval of a majority of the voting power. (g) Reduction in Number of Directors. No reduction of the authorized number of directors shall have the effect of removing any director before that director's term of office expires. ARTICLE VHI Board Meetings Section 1. Place of Meetings. Regular and special meetings of the Board of Directors may be held at any place within the County that has been designated from time to time by resolution of the Board and stated in the notice of the meeting. In the absence of such designation, regular meetings shall be held at the principal office of the Association. Notwithstanding the above provisions of this Section 1, a regular or special meeting of the Board may be held at any place consented to in writing by all the Board members, either before or after the meeting. If consents are given, they shall be filed with the minutes of the meeting. Any meeting, regular or special, may be held by conference telephone or similar communication equipment, so long as all directors participating in the meeting can hear one another, and all such directors shall be deemed to be present in person at such meeting. -12- City Council 26 — 638 1/16/2024 Section 2. Annual Meeting of Directors. Immediately following each annual meeting of Members, the Board of Directors shall hold a regular meeting for the purposes of organization, election of officers, and the transaction of other business. Notice of this meeting shall not be required. Section 3. Other Regular Meetings. Ordinarily, regular meetings shall be conducted at least monthly. However, regular meetings can be held as infrequently as quarterly if the Board's business does not justify more frequent meetings. Notice of the time and place of regular meetings shall be posted in a prominent place within the Common Area, and shall be communicated to the Board members not less than four (4) days prior to the meeting; provided, however, that notice need not be given to any Board member who has signed a written waiver of notice or consent to holding the meeting as more particularly provided in Article VIII, Section 7. Section 4. Special Meetings of the Board. (a) Who May Call a Special Meeting. Special meetings of the Board of Directors may be called for any purpose at any time by the President or any two Directors. (b) Notice of Special Meetings. (i) Manner of Giving. Notice of the time and place of special meetings of the Board shall be given to each Director by one of the following methods: (A) by personal delivery of written notice; (B) by first-class mail, postage prepaid; (C) by telephone communication, either directly to the director or to a person at the director's home or office who would reasonably be expected to communicate such notice promptly to the director; or (D) by facsimile. All such notices shall be given or sent to the Director's address or telephone number as shown on the records of the Association. Notwithstanding the foregoing, notice of a meeting need not be given to any Director who signed a written waiver of notice or a written consent to holding the meeting or an approval of the minutes thereof as more particularly provided in Article VIII, Section 7. (ii) Time Requirements. Notices shall be delivered, telephoned, or sent by facsimile four (4) days before the time set for the meeting. (iii) Notice Contents. The notice shall state the time, place, and purpose of the meeting. Section 5. Attendance by Members; Common Interest Development Open Meeting Act Provisions. (a) Meetings Generally Open to Members. With the exception of executive sessions of the Board (see subparagraph (b), below), any member of the Association may attend meetings of the Board of Directors, provided, however, that nondirector Members may participate in deliberations or discussions of the Board only when expressly authorized by a vote of a majority of the directors present at the meeting at which a quorum has been established or by the Board member chairing the meeting. For purposes of the Open Meeting Act, the term "meeting" includes any congregation of a majority of -13- City Council 26 — 639 1/16/2024 the members of the Board at the same time and place to hear, discuss, or deliberate on any item of business scheduled to be heard by the Board, except those matters that may be discussed in executive session. (b) Executive Sessions. The Board, on the affirmative vote of a majority of the directors present at a meeting at which a quorum is present, shall be entitled to adjourn at any time for purposes of reconvening in executive session to discuss (i) litigation in which the Association is or may become a parry; (ii) matters relating to the formation of contracts with third parties; (iii) Member discipline; or (iv) personnel matters. The Board must meet in executive session if requested by a Member who may be subject to a fine, penalty, or other form of discipline and the Member who is the subject of the disciplinary proceeding shall be entitled to attend the executive session. Any matter discussed in executive session shall be generally noted in the minutes of the Board meeting, taking into consideration the need to maintain confidentiality. (c) Board Meeting Minutes. The minutes, minutes proposed for adoption that are marked to indicate draft status, or a summary of the minutes, of any meeting of the Board of Directors, other than minutes of an executive session, shall be available to the Members within 30 days following the meeting. The minutes, proposed minutes, or summary of the minutes shall be distributed to any Member on request and on reimbursement of the Association's costs of making that distribution. Members shall be notified in writing at the time that the pro forma budget required by Article XII, Section 5(a), above, is distributed, or at the time of any general mailing to the entire membership, of the Members' right to have copies of the minutes of any Board meeting and how and where those minutes may be obtained. (d) Members' Right to Notice of Meetings. Members shall be given notice of the time and place of Board meetings (as defined in Section 8.5(a), above), except for "emergency meetings," at least four days before the date of the meeting. This notice may be given by posting the notice in a prominent place or places within the Common Area, by mail or delivery of the notice to each Condominium Unit within the Properties, or by newsletter or similar means of communication. For purposes of this subparagraph (d), an "emergency meeting" of the Board means a meeting called by the president or by any two members of the Board under circumstances that could not have been reasonably foreseen that require immediate attention and possible action by the Board and that of necessity make it impracticable to provide prior notice to the Members as required by the Open Meeting Act. Section 6. Quorum Requirements. A majority of the authorized number of Directors shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business, except to adjourn as provided in Article VIII, Section 8. Every act or decision done or made by a majority of the Directors present at a meeting duly held at which a quorum is present shall be regarded as the act of the Board of Directors, subject to the provisions of the California Nonprofit Mutual Benefit Corporation Law, especially those provisions relating to (a) approval of contracts or transactions in which a Director has a direct or indirect material financial interest, (b) appointment of committees, and (c) indemnification of Directors. A meeting at which a quorum is initially present may continue to transact business, notwithstanding the withdrawal of Directors below a quorum, if any action taken is approved by at least a majority of the required quorum for that meeting, or such greater number as is required by these Bylaws, by the Articles, or by law. -14- City Council 26 — 640 1/16/2024 Section 7. Waiver of Notice. Any action taken at any meeting of the Board of Directors, however called and noticed or wherever held, shall be as valid as though taken at a meeting duly held after regular call and notice, if (a) a quorum is present, and (b) either before or after the meeting, each of the Directors not present, individually or collectively, signs a written waiver of notice, a consent to holding the meeting, or an approval of the minutes. The waiver of notice or consent need not specify the purpose of the meeting. All waivers, consents, and approvals shall be filed with the Association records or made a part of the minutes of the meeting and shall have the same force and effect as a unanimous vote of the Board. The requirement of notice of a meeting shall also be deemed to have been waived by any Director who attends the meeting without protesting the lack of proper notice either before or at the inception of the meeting. Section 8. Adjournment. A majority of the Directors present, whether or not constituting a quorum, may adjourn any meeting to another time and place. If the meeting is adjourned for more than 24 hours, notice of adjournment to any other time or place shall be given prior to the time of the adjourned meeting to the Directors who are not present at the time of the adjournment. Except as provided above, notice of adjournment need not be given. Section 9. Action Without a Meeting. Any action required or permitted to be taken by the Board of Directors may be taken without a meeting, if all members of the Board, individually or collectively, consent in writing to that action. Such action by written consent shall have the same force and effect as a unanimous vote of the Board of Directors. Such written consent or consents shall be filed with the minutes of the proceedings of the Board and shall have the same force and effect as a unanimous vote of the Board. If prompt or immediate action of the Board is necessary and there is insufficient time to comply with the notice requirements set forth herein, reasonable efforts shall nevertheless be made to contact all Board members regarding the proposed action in advance thereof, rather than relying on notification after the fact. Section 10. Compensation. Directors, Officers, and Members of Committees shall not be entitled to compensation for their services as such, although they may be reimbursed for such actual expenses as maybe determined by resolution of the Board of Directors to be just and reasonable. Expenses for which reimbursement is sought shall be supported by a proper receipt or invoice. ARTICLE IX Duties and Powers of the Board Section 1. Specific Powers. Without prejudice to the general powers of the Board of Directors set forth in Article VII, Section 1, the Directors shall have the power to exercise all powers vested in the Board under the Governing Documents, including without limitation Article V of the Declaration, and under the laws of the State of California. -15- City Council 26 — 641 1/16/2024 ARTICLE X Committees Section 1. Committees of Directors. In addition to the Architectural Control Committee appointed and constituted pursuant to the Declaration, the Board may, by resolution adopted by a majority of the Directors then in office, designate one or more committees, each consisting of two or more Members (who may also be Directors), to serve at the pleasure of the Board. Committees shall have all the authority of the Board with respect to matters within their area of assigned responsibility, except that no committee, regardless of Board resolution, may: (a) Take any final action on any matter that, under the California Nonprofit Mutual Benefit Corporation Law, also requires approval of the Members. (b) Fill vacancies on the Board of Directors or on any committee that has been delegated any authority of the Board. (c) Amend or repeal Bylaws or adopt new Bylaws. (d) Amend or repeal any resolution of the Board of Directors that by its express terms is not so amendable or repealable. (e) Appoint any other committees of the Board of Directors or the members of those committees. (f) Expend Association funds to support a nominee for Director after there are more people nominated for Director than can be elected. (g) Approve any transaction (i) to which the Association is a party and one or more Directors have a material financial interest; or (ii) between the Association and one or more of its Directors or between the Association or any person in which one or more of its Directors have a material financial interest. Section 2. Effect of Committee Actions. Unless otherwise expressly provided in the Governing Documents or in the Board resolution authorizing and empowering a committee, all actions of any committee shall be considered advisory to the Board and shall be scheduled on the agenda of the Board meeting next following the committee's action or decision for affirmation, rescission, or modification, as the Board in its discretion deems appropriate. ARTICLE XI Officers Section 1. Officers. The Officers of the Association shall be a President, a Vice President, a Secretary and a Chief Financial Officer. The Association may also have, at the discretion of the Board, one or more Assistant Secretaries, one or more Assistant Treasurers, and such other officers as may be -16- City Council 26 — 642 1/16/2024 appointed in accordance with the provisions of Section 3. One person may hold two or more offices, except that neither the Secretary nor the Chief Financial Officer may serve concurrently as President. Section 2. Election of Officers. The Officers of the Association, except such officers as may be appointed in accordance with the provisions of Sections 3 and 5, shall be chosen annually by majority vote of the Board at its first regular meeting following the annual meeting of the Members or the election of Directors, and each shall hold his or her office until he or she shall resign or shall be removed or otherwise disqualified to serve, or his or her successor shall be elected and qualified. Section 3. Subordinate Officers. The Board may appoint, and may empower the President to appoint, such other Officers as the affairs of the Association may require, each of whom shall hold office for such period, have such authority and perform such duties as are provided in the Bylaws and as the Board may from time to time determine. Section 4. Removal of Officers. Any Officer may be removed by the Board with or without cause, at any regular or special meeting. Section 5. Resignation of Officers. Any Officer may resign at any time by giving written notice to the Board, or to the President, or to the Secretary. Any such resignation shall take effect on the date of receipt of such notice or at any later time specified therein, and unless otherwise specified therein, acceptance of such resignation shall not be necessary to make it effective. Any resignation is without prejudice to the rights, if any, of the Association under any contract to which the Officer is a party. Section 6. Vacancies. A vacancy in any office because of death, resignation, removal, disqualification, or any other cause shall be filled in the manner prescribed in the Bylaws for regular appointments to such office. Section 7. President. The President shall be elected by the Board from among the Directors. He or she shall be the Chief Executive Officer of the Association and shall, subject to the control of the Board, have general supervision, direction and control of the affairs and Officers of the Association. He or she shall preside at all meetings of the Board, and shall have the general power and duties of management usually vested in the office of President of a corporation, together with such other powers and duties as may be prescribed by the Board or the Bylaws. Section 8. Vice President. The Vice President shall be elected by the Board from among the Directors. In the absence or disability of the President, the Vice President shall perform all the duties of the President and when so acting shall have all the powers of, and be subject to all the restrictions upon, the President. He or she shall have such other powers and perform such other duties as from time to time may be prescribed by the Board or the Bylaws. Section 9. Secretary. The Secretary shall be elected by the Board from among the Directors. The Secretary shall keep or cause to be kept at the principal office or such other place as the Board may order, a book of minutes of all meetings of Directors and Members, with the time and place of holding same, whether regular or special, and if special, how authorized, the notice thereof given, the names of those present at Directors' meetings, the number of Members present in person or by proxy at Members' -17- City Council 26 — 643 1/16/2024 meetings, and the proceedings thereof. The Secretary shall keep, or cause to be kept, appropriate current records showing the Members of the Association, together with their addresses. He or she shall give, or cause to be given, notice of all meetings of the Board required by the Bylaws or by law, and shall have such other powers and perform such other duties as may be prescribed by the Board or by the Bylaws. Section 10. Chief Financial Officer. The Chief Financial Officer shall be elected by the Board from among the Directors. The Chief Financial Officer, who shall be known as the Treasurer, shall keep and maintain, or cause to be kept and maintained, adequate and correct accounts of the properties and business transactions of the Association, including accounts of its assets, liabilities, receipts, disbursements, gains, losses, capital, retained earnings, and other matters customarily included in financial statements. The books and records shall at all reasonable times be open to inspection by any Director or Member. The Treasurer shall deposit all monies and other valuables in the name and to the credit of the Association with such depositaries as may be designated by the Board. He or she shall disburse the funds of the Association as may be ordered by the Board, shall render to the President and Directors, whenever they request it, an account of all of his or her transactions as Treasurer and of the financial condition of the Association, and shall have such other powers and perform such other duties as may be prescribed by the Board or the Bylaws. If required by the Board, the Treasurer shall give the Association a bond in the amount and with the surety or sureties specified by the Board for faithful performance of the duties of his or her office and for restoration to the Association of all its books, papers, vouchers, money, and other property of every kind in his or her possession or under his or her control on his or her death, resignation, retirement, or removal from office. ARTICLE XII Member Assessment Obligations and Association Finances Section 1. Description of Assessments to Which Owners Are Subject. Owners of Condominium Units within the Properties are subject to Annual and Special Assessments as described in the Declaration. Section 2. Checks. All checks or demands for money and notes of the Association shall be signed by the President and Treasurer, or by such other Officer or Officers or such other person or persons as the Board of Directors may from time to time designate. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any withdrawal of funds from Association reserve accounts shall require the signature of two Directors or an Officer (who is not also a Director) and a Director. Section 3. Operating Account. There shall be established and maintained a cash deposit account to be known as the "Operating Account" into which shall be deposited the operating portion of all Regular and Special Assessments as fixed and determined for all Members. Disbursements from such account shall be for the general need of the operation including, but not limited to, wages, repairs, betterments, maintenance, and other operating expenses of the Properties. Section 4. Other Accounts. The Board shall maintain any other accounts it shall deem necessary to carry out its purposes, including reserve accounts for replacement of capital improvements as set forth in the Declaration. All Association books of account shall be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. -18- City Council 26 — 644 1/16/2024 Section 5. Annual Report. The Board shall cause an annual report to be furnished not later than 120 days after the close of the corporation's fiscal year to all directors of the corporation which report shall contain the following information in appropriate detail: (a) The assets and liabilities of the corporation as of the end of the fiscal year; (b) The principle changes in assets and liabilities during the fiscal year; (c) The revenue or receipts of the corporation both unrestricted and restricted to particular purposes for the fiscal year; (d) The expenses or disbursements of the corporation for both general and restrictive purposes during the fiscal year. The annual report shall be accompanied by any report thereon of independent accountants or if no such report the certificate of an authorized officer of the corporation that such statements were prepared without audit from the books and records of the corporation. ARTICLE XIII Other Required Disclosure to Members As required by law, the following reports and/or disclosures shall be made or provided to the Members in compliance with the deadlines set forth below: Section 1. Annual Statement of Association's Collection Policy. The Board of Directors shall annually distribute within 60 days before the beginning of the fiscal year a statement describing the Association's policies and practices in enforcing its remedies against Members for defaults in the payment of regular and special assessments, including the recording and foreclosing of liens. Section 2. Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) Disclosure. On an annual basis, the Board shall provide each Member the summaries required by Civil Code Sections 1369.590 and 1363.850. Section 3. Disclosure of Schedule of Fines or Other Monetary Penalties. If the Association adopts a schedule of fines for commonly recurring infractions of the Governing Documents or any other policy imposing a monetary penalty or a fee on any Member for violation of any Governing Document or the Association Rules, including any monetary penalty relating to the activities of a guest or invitee of a Member, the Board shall distribute the schedule or policy to the Members. This distribution obligation shall arise whenever such a schedule or policy is adopted or subsequently amended. Section 4. Avoidance of Duplication in Reporting Obligations. To the extent one document distributed to the Members under Article XII or this Article XIII provides the information required in more than one of the foregoing Sections of this Article and the time deadlines for proper distribution can otherwise be satisfied, any such requirements listed above may be satisfied by sending the Members the same document. -19- City Council 26 — 645 1/16/2024 ARTICLE XIV Miscellaneous Section 1. Inspection of Books and Records. (a) Member Inspection Rights. The Members' rights to inspect and copy Association records shall be governed by Civil Code Section 1365.2, or any comparable superseding statute. (b) Director Inspection Rights. Every Director shall have an absolute right, subject to applicable law, at any reasonable time to inspect all books, records, documents, and minutes of the Association and the physical properties owned by the Association. The right of inspection by a Director includes the right to make extracts and copies of documents. (c) Adoption of Reasonable Inspection Rules. The Board of Directors may establish reasonable rules with respect to (i) notice of inspection, (ii) hours and days of the week when inspection may be made, and (iii) payment of the cost of reproducing copies of documents requested by the Member. (d) Board Meeting Minutes. The minutes themselves, minutes proposed for adoption that are marked to indicate draft status, or a summary of the minutes of any meeting of the Board of Directors, other than the minutes of any executive session, shall be available to the members within 30 days following the meeting. The minutes, proposed minutes, or summary of the minutes shall be distributed to any Member on request and on reimbursement of the Association's costs of making that distribution. Members shall be notified in writing of the Members' right to have copies of the minutes of any Board meeting and how and where those minutes may be obtained. Section 2. Robert's Rules of Order. In the event of a dispute concerning the procedural aspects of any meetings which cannot be resolved by reference to these Bylaws or applicable law, the matter shall be resolved by reference to Robert's Rules of Order. Section 3. Amendment or Repeal of Bylaws by Directors and Members. (a) Amendment by Directors. Except as provided in this subparagraph (a), these Bylaws may be adopted, amended, or repealed ("changed") by the vote of a majority of all Directors. The right of the Directors to change these Bylaws shall not apply to any amendment that: (i) Changes the number of Directors (Corporations Code Section 7151(b)); (ii) Changes any provision pertaining to Directors who hold office by designation (Corporations Code Section 7220(d)); (iii) Changes any provision pertaining to the filling of vacancies on the Board which must, by the terms of these Bylaws, be filled by the vote of the Members; Section 7512); (iv) Changes the quorum requirements for membership meetings (Corporations Code -20- City Council 26 — 646 1/16/2024 Section 7613); (v) Change the Bylaws provisions governing the use of proxies (Corporations Code (vi) Establishes cumulative voting; (vii) Materially and adversely affects the rights of the Members as to voting, dissolution, redemption or transfer; memberships; or (viii) Increases or decreases the number of Members authorized in total or for any class; (ix) Effects an exchange, reclassification, or cancellation of all or part of the (x) Authorizes a new class of membership. (b) Amendment by the Members. Except as provided in subparagraph (a), above, these Bylaws may by adopted, amended, or repealed only by the affirmative vote of a majority of a quorum of the membership represented and voting at a duly held meeting at which a quorum is present or by ballot conducted in accordance with Article IV, Section 4. If any provision of these Bylaws requires the vote of a larger proportion or all of the Members, such provisions may not be altered, amended, or repealed except by such greater vote, unless otherwise specifically provided herein. Any amendment to these Bylaws shall become effective immediately upon approval by the Members. The Secretary of the Association shall certify adoption of any duly approved amendment to the Bylaws and a copy of said certificate and the amendment shall be included in the Association's corporate records. Section 4. Notice Requirements. Any notice or other document permitted or required to be delivered as provided herein may be delivered as provided for within Civil Code Section 1350.7. Section 5. Indemnification. (a) Indemnification by Association of Directors and Officers, Employees, and Other Agents. To the fullest extent permitted by law, the Association shall indemnify its Directors and Officers, employees, and other agents described in Corporations Code Section 7237, including persons formerly occupying any such positions, against all expenses, judgments, fines, settlements, and other amounts actually and reasonably incurred by them in connection with any "proceeding" as that term is used in that Section and including an action by or in the right of the Association, by reason of the fact that such person is or was a person described by that Section. "Expenses," as used in this Section, shall have the same meaning as in Corporations Code Section 7237(a). (b) Approval of Indemnity by Association. On written request to the Board by any person seeking indemnification hereunder, the Board shall promptly determine in accordance with Corporations Code Section 7237(e), whether the applicable standard of conduct set forth in Corporations Code Section 7237(b) or Section 7237(c) has been met, and if it has, the Board shall authorize indemnification. If the Board cannot authorize indemnification because the number of Directors who are parties to the -21- City Council 26 — 647 1/16/2024 proceeding with respect to which indemnification is sought prevents the formation of a quorum of Directors who are not parties to the proceeding, the Board shall promptly call a meeting of Members. At that meeting, the Members shall determine under Corporations Code Section 7237(e) whether the applicable standard of conduct set forth in Corporations Code Section 7237(b) or Section 7237(c) has been met, and if it has, the Members present at the meeting in person or by proxy shall authorize indemnification. (c) Advancement of Expenses. To the fullest extent permitted by law and except as is otherwise determined by the Board in a specific instance, expenses incurred by a Director/Officer seeking indemnification under paragraphs (a) and (b) of this Section 5 in defending any proceeding covered by those Sections shall be advanced by the Association before final disposition of the proceeding, on receipt by the Association of an undertaking by or on behalf of that person that the advance will be repaid unless it is ultimately determined that the person is entitled to be indemnified by the Association for those expenses. (d) Insurance. The Association shall have the power to purchase and maintain insurance on behalf of its Directors and Officers against other liability asserted against or incurred by any Director or Officer, in such capacity or arising out of the Director's or Officer's status as such. Section 6. Construction and Definitions. Unless the context requires otherwise or a term is specifically defined herein, the general provisions, rules of construction, and definitions in the California Nonprofit Mutual Benefit Corporation Law shall govern the construction of these Bylaws. Without limiting the generality of the above, the masculine gender includes the feminine and neuter, and singular number includes the plural and the plural number includes the singular. All captions and titles used in these Bylaws are intended solely for the reader's convenience of reference and shall not affect the interpretation or application of any of the terms or provisions contained herein. -22- City Council 26 — 648 1/16/2024 CERTIFICATE OF SECRETARY The undersigned, Secretary of the corporation known as CIVIC CENTER BUSINESS PARK OWNERS ASSOCIATION does hereby certify that the above and foregoing Restated Bylaws consisting of 22 pages, were duly adopted at a Special Meeting of the Board of Directors of said Association on � 9� 0 and that they now constitute said Bylaws. Dated: �f �•icad l�,�1 �� 2009 By: Orti2, 5ceretary -23- City Council 26 — 649 1/16/2024 Stradl ng Sean B. Absher 415 283 2242 sabsher@stradlinglaw.com December 6, 2023 VIA EMAIL Dr. Collin Felch Deputy Superintendent Vista Charter Public Schools 2609 West Fifth St. Santa Ana, CA 92703 Stradling Yocca Carlson & Rauth A Professional Corporation 44 Montgomery Street, Suite 4200 San Francisco, CA 94104 415 283 2240 stradlinglaw.com Re: Vista Charter School Phase IV; Conditional Use Permit Application; Civic Center Business Park Dear Dr. Felch: It is our understanding that Vista Charter Public Schools ("VCPS") has submitted a conditional use permit application ("CUP Application") to the City of Santa Ana concerning the Vista Charter School Phase IV project ("Project"). The Project is located on Parcel 1, Parcel 2 and Parcel 4 as legally described and shown in Parcel Map No. 84-886, filed in Book 198, Pages 19-20 of Official Records ("Parcel Map"). With respect to the CUP Application and Project, you have asked us to evaluate what rights, if any, are held by the owners of Building C and Building D within the Civic Center Business Park that would impair VCPS's right to develop the Project and process the CUP Application. In undertaking this evaluation, we have reviewed the original Declaration recorded April 19, 1985 as Document No. 85-240398 of Official Records, the First Amendment to original Declaration recorded January 3, 1986 of Official Records and the Second Amendment to original Declaration recorded August 10, 2016 as Document No 2016-000375684 of Official Records applicable to the formation, management and operation of the Civic Center Business Park (collectively, the "Materials"). Based on my review of the Materials, it is our opinion that the owners of Building C and Building D do not have any property rights in Parcel 1, Parcel 2 and Parcel 4 that would impair VCPS's right to develop the Property and process the CUP Application. First, pursuant to the First Amendment to original Declaration, Parcel 4 is no longer a part of the Civic Center Business Park. Accordingly, the owners of Building C and Building D do not hold any property rights in Parcel 4 that would impair the right of VCPS to develop the Project and process the CUP Application. Second, the owners of Building C and Building D do not hold any property rights to common area located within the Civic 4877i77ounce 26 — 650 1/16/2024 Dr. Collin Felch, Deputy Superintendent Vista Charter Public Schools December 6, 2023 Page 2 Center Business Park that is included within the Project. Based on our review of the CUP Application, the Project includes Civic Center Business Park common area that is designated "restricted common area" and set aside and allocated for the exclusive use of Building AB Owner" under Section 2.2.5 of the Second Amendment to original declaration. It is our understanding that VCPS is the owner of Building B and the owner of Building A supports the Project and CUP Application. We further note that Section 2.2.5 of the Second Amendment to original declaration goes on to state that "restricted common area shall constitute `exclusive use common area' within the meaning of Section 6550 of the Commercial Association Act." (Id.) Section 6550, subdivision (a) of the Commercial Association Act defines "exclusive use common area" to mean "a portion of the common area designated by the declaration for the exclusive use of one or more, but fewer than all, of the owners of the separate interests and which is or will be appurtenant to the separate interest or interests." Hence, the owners of Building C and Building D do not have any defined property rights in the exclusive use common area that is apart of the Project. Please let me know if you have any questions, or require further information. Very truly yours, STRADLING YOCCA CARLSON & RAUTH Sean B. Absher 4877i77ounce 26 — 651 1/16/2024 Stradl ng Sean B. Absher 415 283 2242 sabsher@stradlinglaw.com December 7, 2023 VIA EMAIL Dr. Collin Felch Deputy Superintendent Vista Charter Public Schools 2609 West Fifth St. Santa Ana, CA 92703 Stradling Yocca Carlson & Rauth A Professional Corporation 44 Montgomery Street, Suite 4200 San Francisco, CA 94104 415 283 2240 stradlinglaw.com Re: Vista Charter School Phase IV Project; Civic Center Business Park Dear Dr. Felch: This letter addresses the objections to the above referenced Project submitted by Angie Cano and Levi Cano (together "Cann") in a letter dated December 6, 2023 to the Board of Directors of the Civic Center Business Park Owners Association. We have listed below each of the five objections raised by Cano followed by our response. To summarize, we do not believe the objections have any merit. 1. Restrictions on Erecting Fencing. (Article VII, Section 7.3 of the CC&Rs, Page 27: Cano claims the referenced CC&Rs provision restricts the right of Vista Charter Public Schools ("VCPS") to erect fences as shown in the Project plans. We do not agree with the argument to the extent the argument is intended to reference fencing located within Building A/B exclusive use common area. Section 7.3 of the CC&Rs in relevant part states that "no parking spaces shall be fenced off." This provision is intended to prohibit owners of units at Civic Center Business Park from interfering with other owners' use of common area parking. As set forth in our December 6, 2023 letter, the CC&Rs were amended under Section 2.2.5 of the Second Amendment to CC&Rs to define common area parking appurtenant to Building A and Building as "restricted common area" for the "exclusive use of Building AB owner." (Emphasis added.) Cano cannot assert a claim that fencing located within Building AB exclusive use common area interferes with their rights as they have no use rights in Building AB restricted common area, including parking areas located thereon. 2. Reciprocal Easement Agreement: Cano claims the Reciprocal Easement Agreement explicitly prohibits the construction of barriers, Hsi i y ounce 26 — 652 1/16/2024 Dr. Collin Felch, Deputy Superintendent Vista Charter Public Schools December 7, 2023 Page 2 such as fences or walls and the Project would violate the Agreement. We disagree. The Reciprocal Easement Agreement grants to the owners of Parcel 1 and 2 non-exclusive easements for ingress and egress to public streets and highways and parking located on Parcel 3 and Parcel 4. Provided that the non-exclusive easements held by Cano are not impaired, nothing in the Reciprocal Easement Agreement prohibits the right of VCPS to develop the Project. 3. Unanimous Written Consent of Members Document June 9, 1993): Cano claims the referenced document delineates the shared common areas, including parking spaces, and the Project playground within the common areas "would infringe upon the rights and privileges of all unit owners." This is not correct. As discussed in our December 6th letter, the Second Amendment to the CC&Rs is the operative document concerning the rights of the owners of the Association to exclusive use common area that is appurtenant to Building A/B. As stated in our December 6t1i letter, Cano has no right to use any portion of Building A/B exclusive use common area, including the area of the proposed playground located on a portion of the exclusive use common area. 4. Correction Terminology misused by Legal Counsel paid by Vista Charter School: Cano claims that VCPS, through its legal counsel, has erroneously asserted that "Restricted Area" means "Ownership." It is Cano who misunderstands VCPS' position with respect to Building A/B restricted common area. VCPS has not asserted it "owns" the "Restricted Area." As set forth in our December 6th letter, the Second Amendment to CC&Rs in Section 2.2.5 altered the definition of a portion of common area on Parcel 1 and Parcel 2 that is appurtenant to Buildings A/B to mean "restricted common area" for the "exclusive use of Building A/B owner." (Emphasis added.) The ownership rights of Cano in Association common area is irrelevant. What is relevant with respect to VCPS's right to develop the Project is that Cano has no right to use restricted common area appurtenant to Building AB that is contained with the Project. 5. Potential Impact to the Community: Cano makes a claim that there are "practical implications" of the proposed Project in terms of health and safety that go beyond legal arguments based on provisions in the CC&Rs. Any health and safety issues concerning the Project will be addressed through the conditional use permit application process for the Project. This process will as a matter of law include reviewing the Project for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act. ("CEQA"). Hsi i y ounce 26 — 653 1/16/2024 Dr. Collin Felch, Deputy Superintendent Vista Charter Public Schools December 7, 2023 Page 3 Please let me know if you have any questions, or require further information. Very truly yours, STRADLING YOCCA CARLSON & RAUTH Sean B. Absher Hsi i y ounce 26 — 654 1/16/2024 To Whom It May Concern, I am writing to express my strong support for Vista Global Academy's request for permission to expand their facilities to include a field for recreational purposes. My name is Juliana Saldivar, and I have been a long-time resident of the city of Santa Ana. As both a mother and an educator, I understand the crucial role that physical activity and outdoor space play in .children's development and overall health. I firmly believe that the children at Vista Global Academy deserve a safe and suitable place to exercise and engage in recreational activities. In the four years that my daughter has attended this school, I have had nothing but positive experiences and outcomes to share. One particular aspect of Vista Global Academy that has been instrumental in my daughter's well-being is the school's unwavering support for her, especially considering her struggle with anxiety. Among her challenges, my daughter finds crowded and loud spaces overwhelming. Currently, the gym on our campus can be both crowded and noisy, which can be difficult for children like my daughter who thrive in calmer and more open environments. An expansion that includes a field for recreational purposes would not only benefit my child but also many others who may share similar challenges or simply benefit from more space to play and exercise. Looking ahead to the next school year, I plan to enroll my youngest son at Vista Global Academy. Nothing would make me happier than knowing that both my daughter and son will have access to a wonderful campus with a field where they can grow,:learn, and enjoy a wide range of outdoor activities. I kindly request that you consider and grant Vista Global Academy the permission they seek for expansion. Providing a field for the children of Vista Global Academy would contribute to their overall well-being and create an environment where they can thrive academically and personally. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Y,,� —J7 W�_z Juliana Saldivar (714)483-0531 City Council 26 — 655 1/16/2024 Jesus E. Montoya 3627 Aspen Village Way, Apt. A Santa Ana, Ca. 92704-8503 November 8, 2023 City of Santa Ana Planning Commission Chair Bao Pham, Vice -Chair Jennifer Oliva, Manuel J. Escamilla, Isuri S. Ramos, Carl Benninger, Alan Woo, Christopher Leo 20 Civic Center Plaza Santa Ana, Ca. 92701-4058 Dear Planning Commission, Thank you for accepting this letter of support for the Vista Global Academies building project and for your dedicated commitment of building considerations in our vibrant city. I am a native of Santa Ana and a long-time voting resident currently residing in Ward 4. Open green space is a valued amenity in our precious community of Santa Ana and highly needed for athletic activities by our youth. Vista Global Academies is a consistent partner providing resources to the greater Santa Ana community beyond educational services. To highlight a few, Vista Global Academies has open food drives that resonate city-wide with both perishable and non-perishable meal options. Additionally, Vista has hosted multiple health fairs, toy drives, usage of facilities by the Raya Foundation to provide evening basketball practices, and a multi school robotics competition that enhanced notoriety of Santa Ana's welcoming spirit and rich cultural heritages. Having a safe and enclosed outdoor field space for our Santa Ana youth compliments the formational education received daily within the confines of the Vista building. I can testify from my youth utilizing multiple parks in our city to play soccer, handball, skateboard, ride my bicycle, and play baseball with family were essential in having life long affirming experiences of why Santa Ana exemplifies being the seat of Orange County. Every youth in our community is equally deserving of having open air green spaces with affinity to our city. When my parents and I arrived to Santa Ana in May of 1975, we resided in a house that no longer exists at the intersection of West Fifth Street and North Hawley Street. Our playground was the abandoned Santa Ana Branch rail line that connected Santa Ana to Watts until 1950. Beautification has redefined Fifth and Hawley with the renovation of the Tiny Tim Plaza and the development of the OC Street Car adjacent to the Vista building. The Vista's building project will be an additional example of your valiant efforts to continue adding essential green space. Having a community garden to grow nurturing foods in addition to providing educational opportunities makes the open space a family experience. The Vista's building project is congruent with the City of Santa Ana's mission to deliver efficient public services in partnership with our community which ensures public safety, a prosperous economic environment, opportunities for our youth, and a high quality of life for residents. Thank you again for your oversight of developments that contribute to our municipality such as the Vista's building project through the lens of the City of Santa Ana's Strategic Priorities of Community Safety, Modem Facilities & Infrastructure, Efficient City Services, Economic Diversification and Expansion. Council 26 — 656 1/16/2024 To whom it may concern, My name is Zoila Lubin, and Ilive in Ward 2. (1225 S. Douglas St. Santa Ana, Ca 92704). 1 am writing to support Vista Condor Global Academy's building project. My family has been with Vista Charter Schools for seven years. I am a proud parent of one Vista Ulimni and three current Vista students. I have an eighth grader, a second grader, and a kindergartner attending Vista. My favorite. thing about Vista is the community and the respect for what parents need besides their excellent curriculum. I have been with Vista through all of its major construction, and throughout all this time, we, the parents, have always desired an outdoor environment for our children. This expansion will allow my children to have an outdoor playground, play soccer outdoors, and finally have the full spectrum of safety all Santa Ana students deserve with the fencing planned. The school can continue hosting community events with safety and proper facility space. This building plan includes a safety fence around the back of the school. This fence will help keep homeless people out and away from children. I also know that the school will be bringing its district offices to the City of Santa Ana, and as a Santa Ana resident, I know this benefits our community. The district office will have a community garden where all Vista students can learn about gardening and botany. This garden will also help the surrounding community increase its green space. The beautification of this space will further bring parents who benefit from the school's food pantry and community garden and give Fairview St. another beautiful building Sa k.,IL / IAVUI IUI LV - riot 1 / 1 V/LVL'+ Stephanie Reyes 3743 W. Washington St. Santa Ana CA. 92706 714-788-9357 11 /7/2023 To Whom it may concern, I am writing to express my wholehearted support for Vista's building project and to emphasize just how vital this endeavor is for our beloved school and the community it serves. As a member of the Vista community, I have witnessed firsthand the tremendous contributions that Vista has made to our neighborhood. The dedication of the school to not only providing quality education but also to actively engage in community service initiatives like food drives, health fairs, and resources fairs for parents is truly commendable. These efforts have touched the lives of many in our community and have been instrumental in addressing some of the critical needs we face. However, there is one aspect that I believe would significantly enhance the educational experience at Vista — the creation of safe, enclosed outdoor field space for our children. Every child deserves green space and fresh air, and this is especially important for their physical and emotional well-being. With the challenges that modern students face, it is imperative to offer them an environment where they can explore, exercise, and connect with nature. The lack of such outdoor spaces has consequences on their development, including reduced physical activity and opportunities for social interaction. By supporting the building project that includes outdoor spaces, we are not only providing our students with essential resources for growth, but we are also making our community more beautiful and inclusive. Transforming a previously run-down area into modern City Council 26 — 658 1/16/2024 amenities demonstrates our commitment to progress and the betterment of our neighborhood. This not only uplifts the spirits of those within the Vista community but also attracts more families and investment into the area, thus enhancing our community's overall appeal. Additionally, I would like to stress the importance of incorporating a community garden into this project. A community garden can serve as a symbol of growth and nurturing, not only of plants but also of the people within our community. It offers an opportunity for education about sustainable practices, food cultivation, and healthy eating habits. This is especially important in today's world where understanding where our food comes from and promoting self-sufficiency is critical. In conclusion, I want to reiterate my strong support for Vista's building project and the inclusion of safe outdoor spaces and a community garden. These additions will not only benefit the students of Vista but will also contribute to a more vibrant and beautiful community. I believe that our collective efforts can make a positive difference and create a lasting impact on the lives of the people we serve. Thank you for your time and consideration. I look forward to witnessing the positive changes that this project will bring to Vista and our community as a whole. Sincerely, Stephanie Reyes City Council 26 — 659 1/16/2024 November I5, 2023 To Whom It May Concern, My name is Madalyn Wright and I serve as the Site Coordinator for Think Together at our Vista Heritage site. I am writing to you to express my support and excitement in the possibility of transforming part of the back parking lot into an outdoor space for the students. For some background about me, I recently graduated from Chapman University with a BA in Integrated Educational Studies. I have always known that I wanted to work in education and help to influence children as they navigate growing up. I have worked with Think Together for a little less than a year, with my host site being Vista Global Academy. As an organization, Think Together works to "Change the Odds for Kids" by providing free before and after school programs for students. Throughout my time at this site, I have worked in all aspects of our program. I began as a before school program leader, then moved to work as a full time program leader for our summer program, and began this year as the Assistant Site Coordinator. These experiences allowed me to not only get to know the students, but become more familiar with the school itself. One main takeaway from this is the need for a safe outdoor space for -these students. During the summer, we were able to take students on field trips: one in particular being a community park. Seeing the difference in the middle schooler's mood and behavior from playing outside and getting fresh.air helped to put things in perspective. Transitioning into this year, the students began a gardening club using the small community garden in our parking lot. Through the help of the schooI's after school coordinator, I was able to send my students from the program to join the club. They love the chance to get outside and learn more about the process of growing their own food. Needless to say, these activities are the highlight of my students' day. Some of my best memories from my elementary and middle school days happened during outdoor recess and organized activities. Having the privilege to help make that possible for these students is something I am proud to be a part of Vista Global Academy offers resources to both students and families in all aspects of their lives.. This not only ensures the ability for families to feel supported, but allows for students to excel both inside and outside of the classroom. This being said, the lack of outdoor space has only hindered forward progression. While Vista has done an amazing job of adapting to the resources they do have, the addition of a safe, sectioned -off outdoor space for these students would benefit the community as a whole. Best, Madalyn Wright Think Together Site Coordinator: Vista Heritag City Council ' 26 — 660 1/16/2024 Leon Raya, President & Co-founder Pearl Raya, Vice -President and Co -Founder Susie Gray, Secretary, Sandy Aguilar, Director Josh Jogwe, Director Lisa Silva, Director Abraham Hernandez, Director Norma Haro, Director Joe Haro, Director Jacob Gray, Director Roman Reyna Honorary Director Principal, Lisa Solomon Honorary Director Aaron Raya Honorary Director November 14, 2023 Jocelyn Guerra--Chacon Community Coordinator Vista Heritage Global Academy 2609 W. Sth St Santa Ana, CA, 92703 Dear Ms. Guerra-Chacon: .v 'Ris* Above Your R.A.7A. FOUNWCfION "afoundation.org RAYA FOUNDATION-501CA California Public Benefit Corporation EIN##46-0646242 C3U9874 941 Sharon Road The RAYA Foundation is pleased to write this letter of support for the Vista/Condor/Heritage (Vista) project to expand their back parking lot and transform it into a fenced outdoor field, black top area and community garden for the students and community. Vista has been a community partner v -ith the RAYA Foundation for the last three years. They have graciously allowed us to use their gymnasium facility for RAYA Foundation programs including, sports clinics, leagues, family events and parent education gatherings. We support the addition of the needed outdoor space. We have participated with Vista in community- fairs and this project would allow those opportunities to expand. Santa Ana is deficient in green space and this project would transform the area into an uplifting community amenity. Of particular excitement is the planned community garden and a place where the students can play and enjoy the outdoors. Vista has done a great job engaging the Santa Ana community and providing service. This project nor only will enhance their school but will be a community asset. If you have any questions we can be reached by email at 1praya@pacbell.net or at 714-313-1030. Sincerely, Pearl Raya �J Co -Founders RAYA Foundation Leon Raya City Council 26 — 661 1/16/2024 r. Ab;1�1. - Dear Planning Committee, I'm a Santa Ana resident and a staff member at Vista Global Academy. I live in Ward 5. I'm supporting Vista's building project because I feel that the students need a space to enjoy the outdoor environment and explore nature. I appreciate Vista as a school because each classroom is named after a country and the stairway has hello written in the country language. Engaging the students in a global orientation helps the students know more about the country. Vista has done so much for the community. For example, having food drives, toy drives and resource fairs, dental services for students, ect. Many families attend the food drives every Saturday morning and last Friday of the month. The food drive benefits so many families in the Vista community by giving out frozen meat patties, fresh fruit and vegetables. Also, a special box program every last Friday of the month. Having the parents engage and learn more about student school by coming in and having a coffee with the principals. Parents can ask questions about the school or how they can help their student outside of school. I want Vista to have a safe, enclosed outdoor field space for the students to have fresh air and a mindful environment to mentally prepare themselves for class. Embracing the liberty that the students don't have in a school site to spend time with friends enjoying the outdoor environment. Having an outdoor field space will encourage students to join a sport or even have a spot to play a sport that can't be played indoors. Having a community garden will benefit the students a lot because it shows the effort each student City Council 26 — 662 1 /16/2024 puts in when they water the fruit and vegetables. Each student works super hard to maintain the garden looking beautifully and healthy. Having Vista Charter Public School District Offices will give more space and place for the workers to concentrate. Vista will be enjoyable and a good mindset with a community garden and outdoor field. Sincerely, Maria Pacheco lftiv�o f. City Council 26 — 663 1/16/2024 To Whom It May Concern, I am writing to express my strong support for the proposed expansion plans of Vista Condor Global Academy and Vista Heritage Global Academy. As a parent of four children, two of whom currently attend Vista Condor and one at Vista Heritage, I have witnessed first-hand the exceptional educational environment these institutions provide. What sets these academies apart is not just their academic excellence but the sense of community and enthusiasm for learning they instill in students. My children are consistently excited about attending school, a sentiment that was rare in my own experience with traditional public schooling. Their eagerness is a testament to the nurturing and engaging atmosphere fostered by the dedicated staff and administration. A key aspect of this excitement stems from the planned expansions. These include a vegetable garden and restructured outdoor spaces, which promise to enrich the students' educational experience even further. These additions are not merely physical enhancements but represent a commitment to holistic education, promoting environmental awareness, physical well-being, and practical learning opportunities. As a parent, the logic behind these expansions is clear and compelling. They reflect a forward -thinking approach to education that our community needs. However, I understand that such projects require broader support and approval. I urge you to consider the impressive achievements of these academies, despite their current spatial limitations. With the proposed expansions, I am confident they will elevate their educational offerings to new heights, benefiting not just current and future students but our community as a whole.. In conclusion, I strongly advocate for the approval of the expansion plans for Vista Condor and Vista Heritage Global Academies. This development is not just an investment in the schools but in the potential and future of our children and community. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Beethoven Lubin, 1//i7/zvz3 City Council 26 — 664 1/16/2024 . Pedro Miranda Ward 2 To whom it may concern, I am a lifelong resident of Santa Ana writing on behalf of Vista Charter Global Academy to advocate for the expansion of a back gated area and a community garden. I believe VCGA should be allowed to expand because the extra space is'needed. The backlot could be a multifunctional space that students could use. The backlot can be used for the garden, it can also be used for students to go and take a break/do work in. Having an open space where students can go and be one with nature could have benefits to students' mental well-being. A back gated area could be extra protection for students having no sort of barrier from the back doors to the alley makes the school and students susceptible to dangers. Something I really value about Vista is their philosophy of restoration instead of punishment. Young individuals from low-income neighborhoods are subjected to higher chances of being incarcerated, these chances are heightened when those students are students of color, immigrants, or in dysfunctional households. This is sadly the reality many of our own students at Vista Charter face. It might seem obtuse to think that extra space and a community garden can do much to change these realities but yet it can. If students see that their schools and community are being invested in and progressing they feel special. A school garden can help regulate high emotions that can be experienced inside a classroom. Many students get overstimulated being inside a classroom for so long. Being in a garden helps them relax. A community garden will also help students connect with nature, provide hands-on learning, take a breath from the indoor classroom, practice mindfulness of oneself and take care of nature while exploring and learning about soil health, insects, life cycles of animals and plants. Community gardens bring communities together and even invite parents to be more involved, their is a high amount of parents that become engaged in maintaining the garden and learning about planting. In conclusion, I believe the expansion of Vista and the building of a back gate and community garden will be beneficial to students, parents, and staff. It will help students have a space that it's outside the classroom and still engages in learning. It will help build community and get them engaged in our school as well. A back gate provides extra security from keeping individuals that are not supposed to be in campus outside and keeping our students and staff members more safe. City Council 26 — 665 1/16/2024 Dear Santa Ana Planning Committee, My name is Kimberly Cortez, I am a staff member.at Vista Global Academy. I live in Ward 5. Here are a few reasons why I feel like Vista will benefit from this expansion. Having Vista Charter Public School district offices so close to our school will make sure if we have any ideas or district meetings we will be able to have access to these offices faster and more efficiently. Vista as a whole has done so many wonderful things for the community like food drives every Friday, as well as toy drives and dental services far the kids. Students will be able to use the enclosed green space safely and it will keep kids safe from cars and strangers. I as a Teaching Assistant know that sometimes kids just need a breather just as much as us adults do so having this green space to step outside and get some fresh air and Vitamin D from the sun would really benefit students. Aside from these wonderful improvements to the school also adding a community garden will make the space much nicer and make a pretty run down area more attractive and modern. Apart from adding a new green space there will also be a new blacktop area that will encourage kids to join sports. The black top will also be used as our area for parent pick up and drop off which will make it safer for students to be picked up and dropped off at school. The safety and well being of our students is number one priority. I hope you will consider this amazing expansion to our school. Thank you for your time and consideration, Sincerely, Kimberly Cortez City Council 26 — 666 1/16/2024 Michael Allaway 2609 W 5th St Santa Ana, Ca 92703 mallawa}(@vistacharterps. ora 951-897-1423 1 November 2023 Dear Members of the Vista City Planning Commission, am writing to express my wholehearted support for the proposed expansion of our school, Vista Global Academies, which includes the addition of a field, blacktop, and community garden. As a teacher, sports coach, and full-time resident of Santa Ana, this project represents an invaluable opportunity to provide our current students with access to the outdoors, green space, and fresh air, while also creating a safe and enclosed. outdoor environment. l firmly believe that this expansion will be a positive and transformative addition for our school community, as well as the broader Artesia Pilar neighborhood. First and foremost, I would like to convey our deepest gratitude for Vista's mission to provide a transformative, global. experience for students. As a school dedicated to serving students from low-income backgrounds, Vista's commitment to empowering and enriching the lives of those who may face unique challenges is both commendable and inspiring. The impact of Vista's work extends far beyond the classroom, shaping the future of our community for the better. Approving the expansion of our school would enable our students to have more outdoor, global -based opportunities, such as allowing for sports to be authentically practiced and conducted, a community garden to be maintained, and an opportunity for our students to engage in classroom simulations outdoors, all of which are currently compromised. It will offer a safe and inviting space for our students to enjoy the outdoors, encourage physical activity, and host outdoor school and community events. Thus, in a world where the importance of outdoor spaces for learning and recreation is increasingly recognized, this expansion will not only enhance the well-being of our students but also the surrounding community. Artesia Pilar, the neighborhood in which our school is situated, faces challenges, including homelessness, heavy traffic, and close proximity to industrial zones. The addition of these outdoor facilities can play a pivotal role in beautifying our immediate surroundings. By providing our students with a well -maintained, enclosed space for recreation, we hope to foster a sense of pride and ownership in the area. This can contribute to a positive transformation of our neighborhood, offering a welcome respite from the challenges it currently faces. In conclusion, we believe that the proposed expansion is not just about adding physical spaces but creating opportunities for our students to thrive and for our community to flourish. By approving this project, the Vista City Planning Commission has a chance to make a significant and lasting impact on the fives of our students and the neighborhood of Artesia Pilar. We kindly request your support and approval for this project, which emb dies the shared values and aspirations of our school and the city of Vista. We look forward to workin together to make this vision a reality and continue our mission of providing a global and transformative experience to the students we serve. Thank you for your time, consideration, and dedication to making our community a better place. City Council 26 — 667 1/16/2024 Sincerely, Michael Allaway 8th Grade English Teacher Cross Country Coach Full -Time Santa Ana Resident City Council 26 — 668 1/16/2024 Subject: Strong Endorsement and Support for Vista's Building Project Dear Santa Ana Planning Committee, I hope this message finds you well. I am writing to express my wholehearted support for Vista's upcoming building project. As a member of the community and Vista Staff member, I have witnessed the positive impact Vista has had on children's education and our neighborhood as a whole. Vista has been more than just a school or job to me; it has been another home to me filled with wonderful co-workers and families that are constant reminders of why I fell in love with. Santa Ana after moving here 10 years ago. This place was built and started by people who sought more for their children and their community. The commitment to excellence in education, the nurturing environment, and maintaining the sense of community at Vista has truly been a labor of love. The school's dedication to providing a holistic educational experience is reflected not only in the classroom but also through various community projects and events. I have had the joy of helping with the numerous outreach programs and events organized by Vista for the betterment of our community. From our weekly Vista Food Pantry and health fairs to resource fairs for parents, Vista consistently goes above and beyond to address the diverse needs of its students and their families. Such initiatives not only strengthen the bond within the community but also contribute to the overall well-being of its members. One aspect that I believe deserves special attention is the need for safe, enclosed outdoor field space for our children. Every child deserves access to green space and fresh air, and i am confident that incorporating such areas into Vista's expansion project will have a profound positive impact on the students' physical and mental well-being. Research consistently highlights the importance of outdoor spaces in enhancing cognitive abilities, reducing stress, and fostering a sense of community among students. Moreover, transforming the currently urban areas into beautiful, modern amenities will not only uplift the school but also enhance the overall aesthetics of our community. This project has the potential to be a catalyst for positive change, turning neglected spaces into vibrant, inviting areas that contribute to the overall charm of our neighborhood. City Council 26 — 669 1/16/2024 in line with the emphasis on outdoor spaces, I would like to stress the importance of allowing us to develop our space to expand our Vista Community Garden. Our community garden not only provides a space for nurturing and growing food but also serves as an educational tool, teaching our children valuable lessons about sustainability, responsibility, and teamwork. In conclusion, I urge you to throw your full support behind Vista's building project. By doing so, we are not just investing in a school, we are investing in the future of the community our families and staff have created. Thank you for considering my thoughts, and I look forward to witnessing the positive transformations that will undoubtedly result from this initiative. Sincerely, Liza Hernandez Vista Afterschool Coordinator Ihernandez@v.istacharterps.org 661-374-9105 City Council 26 — 670 1/16/2024