My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Correspondence - Item 23
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2024
>
04/02/2024
>
Correspondence - Item 23
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/3/2024 11:10:51 AM
Creation date
3/26/2024 11:23:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Date
4/2/2024
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
333
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Flores, Dora <br />From:Jeff Cessna <cessnajb@gmail.com> <br />Sent:Monday, April <br />To:eComment <br />Subject:McDonald's Project at Tustin/Santa Clara <br /> Attention: This email originated from outside of City of Santa Ana. Use caution when opening attachments or links. <br />I am a 32 year resident of Santa Ana living near the proposed project and am here to detail why this project should never be <br />approved. I want to point out that l am not a crazed NIMBY fighting every project. In reality l am a retired SCE senior electrical <br />distribution planner and have attended many quarterly joint utility meetings here in the past and have designed and managed the <br />electrical distribution for many commercial projects in Santa Ana and throughout North Orange County. <br /> <br /> Listed below are the reasons, explanations and justifications against this project: <br /> <br />1) There is no way to mitigate the traffic congestion and public safety problems created by this project. Compare this proposal with <br />the project on the N/E corner of Tustin and 17th (ln and Out and ChickfilA). l did the initial electrical design for that project and it <br />was properly designed to mitigate all the traffic and safety problems it created. It is a corner lot and was zoned for commercial <br />use. Property was taken as a condition of development (I assume) and used for a bus stop and turn lane into the property to mitigate <br />the congestion and public safety issues created by the project. It has worked as designed and if anything, northbound traffic flow on <br />Tustin has improved. Also this project was initially designed for three businesses. hence the vacant land on the North end of the <br />development. Why not develop that space with no zoning change, safety and traffic congestion issues already addressed, and no <br />impact to the local residents in complete contrast with the proposed McDonalds project. <br /> <br />2) Recently completed street improvements to Santa Clara have significantly improved the safety of the Tustin/Santa Clara <br />intersection. Over the years my wife and l have seen numerous accidents and near misses at the Tustin/Santa Clara intersection. My <br />wife and I were T-boned there in 2017 and our car was totaled. The proposed McDonald’s Project does not allow for necessary street <br />improvements to mitigate the increased traffic and congestion problems and will more than undo the improvements recently <br />completed. It WILL cause more congestion, frustration, accidents and serious injuries. <br /> <br />In conclusion: Padding the monetary bottom line of the Texas real estate company pushing this project and increasing city sales tax <br />revenue are not valid reasons to change zoning restrictions and permit a project that will negatively impact local residents, businesses, <br />including Plumfield Preschool, directly across the street, and will cause congestion, traffic, bike, and pedestrian accidents, injuries, <br />and possibly deaths. <br />Thank you, Jeff Cessna <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.