Laserfiche WebLink
of the shopping center would be blocked and therefor cause a back up of vehicles, potential backing up onto <br />Santa Clara. Also, where there a reason why only AM and Mid -Day queueing was evaluated? What about in <br />the PM? This is a bigger concern and the peak demand to access the Stater Brother store is highest in the <br />evening, during the 4-6 PM timeframe, which would be the same time as another peak time for the project. I <br />analysis used 3 other project sites, but were the conditions similar to those at this location or were they just <br />looking at the duel drive thru condition? <br />Per the analysis and Table 1-3, improvements are needed as part of the Horizon Year (2040), specifically a 2nd <br />NB left at the intersection of Santa Clara and Tustin. Are the fair share fees being paid today or at the time of <br />the improvements? What is the purpose of Section 9 of the Transportation Analysis? If the project has <br />identified the need from improvements to existing transportation infrastructure, then it should be the developer <br />paying for those improvements and not the City. <br />In conclusion, as a long time resident on the vicinity of the project, the impact from the increase traffic is a <br />major concern and therefore I am strongly against the project as it is proposed. I am requesting the Planning <br />Commission to deny approval of this project. <br />Thank you for your consideration of these comments. <br />