Laserfiche WebLink
<br />IBC VISION PLAN 2018 TRAFFIC STUDY UPDATE – <br />ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS <br />Final <br />1 INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY <br />1.1 Introduction <br />This 2018 IBC Vision Plan Two-Year Traffic Study Update (2018 Update) evaluates potential traffic impact <br />locations and documents how development actually occurred over the past two years. The update takes a <br />“snapshot” of the development activity today and considers ambient regional growth to compare with the <br />2010 and 2015 assumptions. If as a result of actual development, the original traffic impacts are altered or <br />changed, the City has the ability to revise the list of traffic mitigations and IBC fees accordingly within the <br />umbrella of the adopted Vision Plan. <br />Six alternative land use scenarios are tested in the 2018 IBC Vision Plan Two-Year Traffic Study Update (2018 <br />Update). This supplemental report includes additional analysis for two alternative scenarios in the Buildout <br />condition to test the removal of future highway network improvements. The study area defined in the 2018 <br />Update is also used for this report. The following two scenarios were analyzed: <br />Alternative 2 – Reflects updated Vision Plan assumptions anticipated to be constructed by Buildout <br />but with the removal of the MPAH widening of Red Hill Avenue from four to six lanes between <br />MacArthur Blvd and Main Street which is currently assumed in the Buildout scenario. Alternative 2 is <br />compared to the Buildout with Update scenario. <br />The location of these two improvements is illustrated in Figure 1.1 and Figure 1.2. <br />For both the Alternative 1 and Alternative 2 scenarios, land use is assumed to be the same as Buildout <br />Cumulative Baseline With Update scenario, however, the land use assumptions in the comparison scenario <br />used for Alternative 1 and Alternative 2 are different. Alternative 1 tests the land uses associated with the <br />Vision Plan Update as well as the removal of both highway network improvements while Alternative 2 tests <br />only the removal of the single network improvement and no land use changes. <br />A summary of the analysis, list of deficient locations and improvements is provided in the following sections. <br />Detailed analysis of Alternative 1 and Alternative 2 are discussed in Chapter 2 and Chapter 3, respectively. <br />Iteris, Inc. | 6 <br />  <br />  <br />City Council 21 – 7 4/16/2024