1923 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

In ~e tlon Ordering Work 1128 - Wilshire Ave., Ave., etc. In Re ~esolution Ordering Work 1124 - West Fifth St. No. 1122 and passed by the following vote: Ayes: Trustees C.T.Chapman, C.L.Killen, No*s: Trustees None. Absent: Trustees None, This being Res olution Geo. MePhee, Nat ti. J. ¥;. Tubb s. Neff, the time and rlace fixed by and set forth in of Intention No. 1093 to order work done and improvement made upon a portion of Wilshire Avenue, ~ Broadway, S. Birch St Borchard Avenue, S. Sycamore St., ~. S. Ross, S. Van Ness, S. Patton and S. Garnsey Sts. and the B~rd of Trustees being duly convened in regular sesslou, proceeded to hear and pass upon all protests, add no owner of property liable to be assessed for said work made written protest or any protest against the proposed work or against the extent of the district to be assessed t.herefor, or either of them, and pretest or object or did pro~st cawse why the improvement should no person anpear~ng to or object or show any not be carried out in accordance with Resolution of Intention No. 1093, the Board of Trustees deemed thnt it had acquired jurisdiction to order the proposed improvement. Thereupon Trustee Neff introduced a resolution orderir~g the work to be don~ and improvement to be made, which is briefly described ~ Resolution of Intention No. 109S. T]~e resolution was filed, read, eo, sldered, designated Resolution Ordering ','ork No. ll2~, and passed by the following vote: Ayes: Trustees C.H.Chapman, Geo. McPhee, Nat ~. Neff, C. L. Killen, J. V,. Tubbs. Noes: Trustees None. Absent: Trustees Ilone. Tl,~s being tke t!rqe and ~lace fixed and set forth in kesolution of Intention No. 1102 to order work done and imr. rove~ent made upon ~ portion of West Fifth ~treet and t}'e Board of Trustees ~eing cbly convened in regular secs~on, proceeded to hear and pass upon all protests. No owner of property liable to be assessed for said work mad~ written protest or any protest against the proposed work or against the extent of the dl strict to be assessed therefnr, and no person anpear~ng to protest or did protest or object or show any cause why the improvement should not be carried out in a~cordance with Resolution of Intention No. 1102, the Board of Trustees deemed that it had acquired Jurisdiction to order the proposed i~-mrovemen t.