1924 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

~n Re ~ermit 6. Bondley. In Re ~ Oorrection of minutes - Edin~er St. In Re Proposed contract S. A. V. I. Co. In ~e Hesolution No. 1281 Unpsld Assessmentg Spurgem Street. On motion of Trustee McPh, e, seconded by Chapman and c~rrie¢ C. Bondley w~s granted permission to install revolving b~rb~ pole at 109 W. 3rd St. ~ne Clerk called attention of the Board to the f~ct that the minutes of April ?th, 192A, and April lath, 192A, h~d by oversight, failed to correctly set forth the action of th Board with re~erence to the improvement of Edlnger Street in the following respect: ~at the matter of the hearing of protests against the proposed Improvement of Edinger Street w~s called up on April Vth but the Board having been busy and Trustee McPhee having desired that the hearing be con- tinned one week, the same was regularly continued until ~:80 P. M., April lath, and when the said matter was called on April lath it wes taten up as s continued hearing. Thereupon, after discussion, the following resolution was indorsed: ¥.~ereas, it a~pears that the minutes as written by the Clerk on pages 183 to page 18~ f~led to mention the f~ct th, t the hearing as to the proposed i-'proveme~t of E~Inger St. was regularly continued until 7:30 P. M. April lath, l~2A and the minutes of April lath at page 19~ thereof fail to show that the hearing hsd in said matter on April lath w~s a continued hearln$; Now, therefore, the Clerk is hereby directed to make the following corrections conform to the f~cte: minutes of April ~th, in said minutes in order to make them namely.- that there be added to the 1924, at page 1B~, the statement that the hearing ~n the matter of ordering work or Improvement of Edinger Street be deferred until ~:ZO.P.M. April 14th, 1924 that the mint~es of April 14th at page 1~8 be corrected to read "This being' the time and place to w~ch the hearing of objections against ordering work set forth in Resolution of Intention No. 1206 was deferredv" On motion of Trustee Chapman, seconded by McPhee and carried m~ttsr ~' S. A. V. I. pipe llne and tract No. 680 was referr to the City Attorney, St. Superintendent and Street Committe with power to draw contract covering relocation of pipe line within five years if necessary. This being the t~me and place fixed when interested persons might appear and sbow cause why bonds should not be issued upon the security of the unpaid assessments for work done ~nd improvement made upon a portion of Spurgeon Street ss se out in Resolution of Intention No. 1126, and no person mppea: lng to show cause why said bonds should not be issued,