Xn Re Trus~ee. Ohspman introduced a Resolution AdOpting Plane
<br />Resolution Adopting Plans and Specifications for ~be ~ work to be done in
<br />
<br />and Specifications--Sewer Dist. No.92 the cia2 of Santa Ann upon and along those portions of
<br />
<br />No. 1390.
<br />
<br />MyrtXe St. et al
<br />
<br />In Re
<br />
<br />Resolution of Intention
<br />
<br />No. 1391 - Sewer Dist. No.
<br />
<br />Myrtle Street et al
<br />
<br />Zn Re
<br />
<br />Resolution Determining
<br />
<br />Unpaid Assessments No. 1392
<br />
<br />Flower Street Drainage
<br />
<br /> open public streets and upon-and along three rights of
<br />
<br />way all within enid City, ,11 as prepared by City Engineqr
<br /> and designated as Assessment District No. 92. The ResoJ
<br /> lution was ordered filed, read, considered, designated
<br /> Resolution No. l~gO and passed by the following vote:
<br />
<br />Ayes,
<br />
<br />Noea~
<br />
<br />Absent,
<br />
<br />Trustees C.H. Chspm~n, Oeo MoPhee, E.B.
<br /> Collier, Nat H. Neff, J.W. Tubbs
<br />
<br />Trustees None
<br />
<br />Trustees None
<br />
<br />Trustee Neff introduced s Resolution deola~ring it to be
<br />the intention of the Board of Trustees of the ~ity of
<br />Santa Ass to order wo~ to be done and improvement to b~
<br />made upon and along a portion of Myrtle, Daisy, Frankly~,
<br />So. Arteala, W. ~&ne, W. Walnut, W. First, W. Second,
<br />
<br />W. Third, Townsend, W. Fourth and on .three separate
<br />rights of way known as Sewer District No. gY. The teac?
<br />lution was ordered filed, read, considered, designated
<br />Resolution of Xntention No. 1391 and passed by the Sol-
<br />
<br />l~ing vote:
<br />
<br /> Ayes, Trustees
<br />
<br />Noes, T~ustees
<br />
<br />Absent, Trustees
<br />
<br />OlN. Chspm~n, Gao McPhee, E.B.
<br />Collier, Net H. Neff, J.W. Tubbs
<br />
<br />None
<br />
<br />None
<br />
<br />This being the time andplaoe fixed when interested per-
<br />sons might appear and show cause wh2 bonds should not b~
<br />issued upon the surety of the unpaid assessments for
<br />wor~ done and improvement ma~e upon So. Flower Street
<br />as set out in Reeo!ution of Intention No. lllC', and no
<br />persoR appearing to show cause wh2 said bonds should no~
<br />be issued, T~stee ~efff introduced , Res olutio~ Deter-
<br />mining Unpaid Assessments, for work and improvement mad~
<br />upon ~o. Flower Street, the aggre~te thePeoff, di~ectin8
<br />bonds to be issued for t~ securit2 of the unpaid
<br />assessments, prescribing the den~inatione of said bond~
<br />and providing for the.issuance off same in a~wual seriee~
<br />~e resolution wag 9rder~, fit6d, read, considered,
<br />desi~ated Resolution No. 1~9~ and passed by the follow
<br />
<br />lng vote:
<br /> Ayes,
<br />
<br />Noea,
<br />
<br />Absent,
<br />
<br />Trustees
<br />Trustees
<br />
<br />C.H. Chapman, Gao McPhee,
<br />E.B. Collier, Nat R. Neff,J.W'. Tu'
<br />
<br />None
<br />
<br />Trustees None
<br />
<br />
<br />
|