Laserfiche WebLink
Report from <br /> <br />Edison Co. reference <br /> <br />lights. <br /> <br />In Re <br /> <br />Cle. nin~ cban~e 1 <br /> <br />of Santiago Creek. <br /> <br />In Re <br /> <br />Septic tank site - <br /> <br />S. Bristol Street. <br /> <br />In Re <br /> <br />Sketch of w. ter <br /> <br />Oleo in City. <br /> <br />In Re <br /> <br />Resolution No; ]698 - <br /> <br />0rderinm Work - <br /> <br />Occidental Street. <br /> <br />Mr. ~cPhee submitted a report from the Edison <br />Com~ ny covering nossibil~ty of ourchasln~ service <br />for ~nsmentml lightln~ systems on meter basis <br />instead of present flat rate met~od. ~n motion of <br />Trustee McPhee, seconded by Chapman and earrled, <br /> <br /> accepted and rlaced on file forfuture <br /> <br />re~ort <br />reference <br /> <br />On mot Ion <br /> <br /> of Trustee Col]let, seceded by Goods and <br />o.rried, Street Superlntend~nt w.s instructed to <br />olean channel of Santiago Creek to prevent over- <br />flow from storm water. <br /> <br />On motion of Trustee McPhee, seconded by Collier <br /> <br />and carried, request of Southern California humor <br />Comneny that the City olean up sentic t.nk site on <br /> <br />South Bristol Street w.s denied. <br /> <br />On motion of Trustee Chanman, seconded by Collier <br />and e~rr~ed, Water S.rerintend~nt w.s .utborized to <br />Oreoere sketch sbowin~ streets, size of <br />p~pes, etc. in the ~ity of B.nta Ana~ sketch to <br />accomp.ny nrooosi$ion of Mr. Nolmes w~th referenoe <br />to earthquake insurance. <br /> <br />Tbls belnm tbs d~y .nd ho,~r set for the he~r~n~ of <br />nrotests .~.Inst the improvement of Occidental <br />Street, ~e set out in Resolution of Intention No. <br />l~g~, and the Bo.rd of Trustees being now in <br />regular session, proceeded to oons~er said pro- <br />tests. <br /> <br /> No owner of prooerty liable to be .seessed for <br />s,~d work made written protest ~r ~ny protest <br />e~inst the proposed work or a~.inst the extent <br />of the dlatr~ot to be assessed therefor .nd no <br />person .ooe.r~n~ to ~roteet or object or show any <br />c.use why the improvement should not be carried <br />out in a~cord~nce with Resolution of Intention No. <br />18~, the Bo~rd of Trustees deemed that it <br />.equated Jurisdiction to order two oroooeed i~- <br /> <br /> Trustee Goods introduced a resolution order~n~ <br /> the work to be done .nd im~ovement made ~s briefly <br /> set out in Resolution of Intention No. 18~. The <br /> resolution w.s ordered filed, read, considered, <br /> <br /> <br />