1929 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

400 In Re Petition to Condemn Right-of-way P. E. Railway Company. In Re Bond of James P. Thompson. In Re Donation to Bowling Team. In Re Advertise for Gasoline. In Re Application A. O. Valdez. In Re Reao. No. 20?4 Ordex-ing Work N. Sycamore St. Fire Chief at the following locations: P. D. Epperly 2108 S. Sycamore St. Elmer E. Everett 715 S. Sullivan St. On motion of Trustee Kelly, ried, the petition of R. E. seconded by McBride and car- ~nison, et al, to condemn the right-of-way of the Pacific Electric Railway Company from the intersection of W. Fourth and Artesia Streets to W. Fifth Street for the purpose of street improve- ments, was referred to the City Manager to report back in two weeks. On motion of Trustee Kelly, seconded by Chancy and car- ried, the bond of James P. Thompson for Cement Sidewalk and Curbing was referred to the Chair for approval or disapproval. On motion of Trustee Kelly, seconded by Goode and car- ried, the Clerk was instructed to draw a warrant in amount of $100.00 from the Advertising Fund in favor of Mason Yould, Manager, for expenses of Bowling Team to enter bowling tournament. On motion of Trustee Goode, seconded by Chancy and car- ried, the Clerk was instructed to advertise for gaoltne for the coming year. On motion of Trustee Goode, seconded by Kelly and car- ried, the application of A. C. Valdez in behalf of the Full Gospel Church for permission to pitch a Gospel Tent on the Enion Pacific right-of-way facing on Fourth Streel was granted under supervision of the Sanitary Inspector. This being the time and place set forth in Resolution of Intention No. 9.072 to order the work done and improve- ment made upon and along a portion of North Sycamore Street, between the South line of Washington Avenue and the center line of Seventeenth Street, and the City Council being duly convened in open session, proceeded to hear and pass upon all protests presented. No owner of property liable to be assessed for said work made written protest or any protest against the proposed work or against the extent of the district to be assessed therefor and no person appearing to protest or object or show any cause why the improvement should not be carried out in accordance with Resolution of In- tention No. 2072, the City Council deemed that it had acquired jurisdiction to order the proposed improvement.