1930 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

270 In Re Warrant. In Re Application National Guards. In Re Appointment A. T. Waggener. In Re Purchase Psmk Property. In Re 0onatruction of Sidewalks. In Re Reso. No. 2251 Ordering Issuance of Acquisition Bonds Acq. & Improve.D!st #5 Richland Street. On motion of Trustee Goode, seconded by Kelly and car- ried, the Clerk was instructed to draw warrant in favor of the Metal Craft Company amount cf $$32.40 covering the construction and erection of Neon Eleo~tric Sign at the entrance of Santa Ana Boulevard and Chapman Avenue. On motion of Trustee Goode, secc~ded by Sutton and car- ried, the application of the National Guards for permis- sion to use Baseball Bowl for drill purposes, was g: On motion of Trustee Kelly, seconded by Goode and car- ried, A. T. Waggener was appointed special police without pa~ of the City of Santa Ans. Mr. George Wells,representing the Planning Commission, appeared before the 0ouncil urging the purchase of pro- perty at the northwest corner of Flower and Washington for park purposes. On motion of Trustee ~cBride, secon- ded by Kelly and carried, the matter was taken under advisement and a committee as a whole were appointed to investigate. On motion of Trustee McBride, seconded by Goode and car- ried, property owners were ordered tO ~o~struct on the east side of Bush Street between Twentieth and Santa Clara, the south side of Santa Clara Avenue Bush and the Hoover School, the east side of Spurgeon Street between Santa Clara and Edgewood and the south side of Edgewood Street between Spurgeon and Poinsettia. This being the time and place when and where interested persons might appear and show cause why bonds should not be issued against the lands in the Assessment District in Acquisition and Improvement District No. §, also known as Richland Street, for the purpose of obtaining the amount required to pay the interlocutory Judgments in the action brought to condemn the property sought to be taken for the acquisition of Richland Street, in ac- cordance with Resolution of Intention No. 2125, and the City Council being now in session, proceeded to hear all protests presented. No person appearing to protest or show any cause why bonds should not be issued, a resolution was introduced ordering issuance of acquisition bonds for said district The resoluti°n was o~dered filed, read, considered, designated Resolution No. 2251 and passed by the follow- ing vote: