Laserfiche WebLink
South Coast Technology Center Project <br />CEQA Exemption 15183 <br />RR E-5 Development under the General Plan Update shall support the goals of the <br />renewables portfolio standard, SB 350, and SB 100 to achieve a tiered increase in <br />the use of renewable energy to 60 percent by 2030, and 100 percent by 2045. <br />RR E-7 Development under the General Plan Update shall be in compliance with state and <br />local solid waste regulations including AB 939, AB 341, AB 1327, AB 1826, and <br />Section 5.408 of 2016 California Green Building Standards Code (California Code <br />of Regulations, Title 24, Part 11). <br />4.7 Geology and Soils <br />4.7.1 GPU PEIR Findings <br />The GPU PEIR concluded that future development under the General Plan Update would be <br />subject to potential seismic -related hazards including strong seismic ground shaking, seismic - <br />related ground failure (including liquefaction), and landslides. Further, development associated <br />with the General Plan Update could result in unstable geologic unit or soil conditions, including <br />soil erosion, expansive soils, settlement and collapse, and subsidence. However, implementation <br />of RR G-1, through RR G-3 would reduce impacts to less than significant levels. Specifically, RR <br />G-1 and RR G-2 require development to comply with the most recent version of the California <br />Building Code and SAMC Chapter 8, Buildings and Structures, and RR G-3 requires all buildings <br />or structures within the City that require plumbing fixtures to be connected to a public sewer per <br />SAMC Section 39-51, Mandatory Connections. The GPU PEIR also concluded that development <br />under the General Plan Update could impact known and unknown paleontological resources <br />through grading and construction activities of undeveloped areas or redevelopment that requires <br />more intensive soil excavation than in the past. Therefore, GPU PEIR MM GEO-1 through MM <br />GEO-3 require monitoring based on the sensitivity level of sites for paleontological resources. <br />Overall, the GPU PEIR concluded that implementation of regulatory requirements and MM GEO- <br />1 through MM GEO-3 would reduce geology and soil impacts to less than significant levels. <br />4.7.2 Project Analysis <br />The following section evaluates potential impacts to geology and soils that would result from the <br />construction and operation of the proposed Project. The analysis is primarily based upon <br />Attachment E-1, Geotechnical Design Report, Attachment E-2, Geotechnical Review of Shallow <br />Groundwater and Potential Dewaterina durina Gradina and Construction (Groundwater <br />Memorandum), and Attachment C, Cultural and Paleontological Resources Identification <br />Memorandum (Cultural Memorandum). <br />The Project Site is located in a seismically active area, as is most of southern California. However, <br />the Project Site is not located within a state -designated Alquist-Priolo Fault Hazard Zone. No <br />active faults are known to cross the Project Site. The nearest fault to the Project Site is the San <br />Joaquin Hills Blind Thrust Fault, located approximately 2.6 miles south of the site. The potential <br />for ground rupture due to an earthquake is considered very low. However, the site is located in a <br />seismic hazard zone for liquefaction potential. According to the Groundwater Memorandum, <br />although the design high groundwater in the area is 5 feet deep based on historic levels in the <br />area, the existing shallow groundwater at the Project Site is currently 10 to 15 feet deep based <br />on borings, trenches and other data. Thus, groundwater is not expected to be encountered during <br />excavation activities for the proposed buildings. Wet soil and some groundwater are generally <br />anticipated only for the sewer connection excavation in the street. Based on the subsurface <br />investigation performed as part of the Geotechnical Design Report, types of soils that underlie the <br />site (clayey, silty, sandy alluvium) and the depth of groundwater, the risk for liquefaction at the <br />July 2024 Page 47 <br />