Laserfiche WebLink
South Coast Technology Center Project <br />CEQA Exemption 15183 <br />manufacturing, and food manufacturing facilities would not be permitted. Therefore, the GPU <br />PEIR concluded that odor impacts would be less than significant. <br />4.3.2 Project Analysis <br />The following section evaluates potential short- and long-term air quality impacts that would result <br />from the construction and operation of the proposed Project. The analysis is primarily based upon <br />Attachment A, Air Quality Assessment, and Attachment B, Health Risk Assessment. The Air <br />Quality Assessment and Health Risk Assessment were prepared to fulfill the requirements of GPU <br />PEIR MM AQ-1, MM AQ-2, and MM AQ-3. <br />CONSISTENCY WITH APPLICABLE AIR QUALITY PLAN <br />On December 2, 2022, the SCAQMD Governing Board adopted the 2022 AQMP. The 2022 <br />AQMP incorporates the latest scientific and technical information and planning assumptions, <br />including the latest applicable growth assumptions, updated emission inventory methodologies <br />for various source categories. Additionally, the 2022 AQMP utilized information and data from the <br />South Coast Association of Governments (SCAG) and its 2020-2045 Regional Transportation <br />Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS). While SCAG has recently adopted Connect <br />SoCal2024 (i.e., the 2024-2050 RTP/SCS), SCAQMD has not released an updated AQMP based <br />off of the 2024-2050 RTP/SCS growth projections. As such, this consistency analysis is based off <br />the 2022 AQMP and the RTP/SCS that was adopted at the time, the 2020-2045 RTP/SCS. <br />According to the SCAQMD's CEQA Air Quality Handbook, projects must be analyzed for <br />consistency with two main criteria, as discussed below. <br />Criterion 1: <br />With respect to the first criterion, SCAQMD methodologies require that an air quality analysis for <br />a project include forecasts of project emissions in relation to contributing to air quality violations <br />and delay of attainment. <br />i) Would the project result in an increase in the frequency or severity of existing air quality <br />violations? <br />Since the consistency criteria identified under the first criterion pertain to pollutant <br />concentrations, rather than to total regional emissions, an analysis of a project's pollutant <br />emissions relative to localized pollutant concentrations associated with the California <br />Ambient Air Quality Standards (CAAQS) and National Ambient Air Quality Standards <br />(NAAQS) is used as the basis for evaluating project consistency. As detailed below under <br />the Criteria Air Pollutants subsection, localized concentrations of CO, NOx, PM,o, and <br />PM2.5 would be less than significant during Project construction and operations. Therefore, <br />the proposed Project would not result in an increase in the frequency or severity of existing <br />air quality violations. <br />ii) Would the project cause or contribute to new air quality violations? <br />As discussed below under the Criteria Air Pollutants subsection, the proposed Project <br />would result in emissions that are below the SCAQMD thresholds. Therefore, the Project <br />would not have the potential to cause or affect a violation of the ambient air quality <br />standards. <br />July 2024 Page 20 <br />