Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Maryam Molavi <br />Associate Transportation Planner <br />Planning Division <br />LDR Branch <br />1750 E. 4th Street <br />Santa Ana, Ca 92705 <br />1.The Memorandum prepared by Linscott Law & Greeenspan Engineers on August 16, 2023, Page 3, indicates <br />that the intersection of Bear Street at SR-73 NB Ramps (Intersection No. 37) has forecasted to operate at <br />unacceptable LOS E in the PM peak hour, without or with Project traffic and recommended improvements for <br />Bear Street at SR-73 NB Ramps (Intersection No. 37). The recommended improvements include the following: No. <br />37 – Bear Street at SR-73 NB Ramps: Restripe the existing westbound left-turn lane to provide a shared left/right- <br />turn lane. Modify the existing traffic signal as necessary. <br />Please provide fair share calculation for this recommendation and contact information of the agency and <br />compony that is working on this improvement. <br />2. No maximum saturation flow rate (Veh/hr) per single lane for any movement should exceed 1800 (veh/hr). <br />However, ATTACHMENT 1 APPENDIX E FROM REVISED TRAFFIC CIRCULATION ANALYSIS FOR THE RELATED <br />BRISTOL DATED JUNE 2023, shows the following: Intersection 30: Bristol Street at I-405 NB Ramps, Scenario 1: <br />1 AM Existing shows 1863 (Veh/hr) for the Bristol Street Southbound Right/Through shared lane. Recommended <br />improvements should be addressed in the Memorandum prepared by Linscott Law & Greeenspan Engineers on <br />August 16, 2023. Intersection 31: Bristol Street at I-405 SB Ramps, the saturation flow rate (veh/h) for the Bristol <br />Street Southbound right lanes movement is not provided. Please provide missing information. <br />From: Meaghan Truman <Mtruman@epdsolutions.com> <br />Sent: Friday, August 18, 2023 3:45 PM <br />To: Molavi, Maryam@DOT <maryam.molavi@dot.ca.gov> <br />Cc: Pezeshkpour, Ali <APezeshkpour@santa‐ana.org>; Alisha.Winterswyk@bbklaw.com; Hannah.Park@bbklaw.com; <br />Soto, Ricardo <rsoto@santa‐ana.org>; Konnie Dobreva <Konnie@epdsolutions.com> <br />Subject: City of Santa Ana Related Bristol Specific Plan ‐ Caltrans NOP Comment Letter <br />EXTERNAL EMAIL. Links/attachments may not be safe. <br />Good Aꢂernoon Maryam, <br />On behalf of the City of Santa Ana, as the City’s environmental consultant for the Related Bristol Project, please see <br />aꢁached responses to Caltrans’ comment leꢁer submiꢁed on the Noꢀce of Preparaꢀon for the Related Bristol Specific <br />Plan Project. In addiꢀon, I’ve aꢁached the supporꢀng Traffic Analysis for Caltrans Traffic Operaꢀons prepared by <br />Linscoꢁ, Law, & Greenspan. Hopefully these two memos provide answers to the comments and quesꢀons provided by <br />Caltrans in the NOP comment leꢁer as well as the recent leꢁer submiꢁed on the Draꢂ EIR. In addiꢀon, the following link <br />contains the HCM/LOS worksheets (referenced as Aꢁachment 1) for your review. <br />Aꢁachment 1.pdf <br />Please let us know if these responses alter any of your Agency’s comments on the Draꢂ EIR (as submiꢁed on August 14, <br />2023). We are also happy to set up a meeꢀng with your Agency if you have any addiꢀonal quesꢀons or would like to <br />discuss any of this further. <br />Thanks, <br />Meaghan Truman | Associate Environmental Planner <br />mtruman@epdsoluꢀons.com <br />2 <br />  <br />  <br />City Council 22 – 610 9/17/2024