My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packet_2024-09-17
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2024
>
09/17/2024
>
Agenda Packet_2024-09-17
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/11/2024 9:10:51 AM
Creation date
9/11/2024 8:59:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Clerk of the Council
Date
9/17/2024
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1807
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />cars for transportation. The comment states that ignoring this fact results in parking conflicts in neighboring <br />residential areas. <br />Response L12.4: The comment does not raise any specific environmental concern with the analysis within <br />the Draft SEIR and presents the commenter’s opinion. The Project proposes a mixed-use infill development <br />located in a TPA on an urban and developed site in the City of Santa Ana. As discussed in Section 5.13, <br />Transportation, the City of Santa Ana Traffic Impact Study Guidelines Appendix A identifies that the <br />Project site is located within a TPA. The Project area is served by six OCTA routes: Routes 55, 57, 76, 86, <br />150, and 553. Specifically, OCTA Route 57 serves as a high-quality bus stop with headways of 15 minutes <br />or less during weekday peak commute hours. OCTA Bus Route 553 connects to the Anaheim Regional <br />Transportation Intermodal Center and OCTA Bus Route 86 connects to the Irvine Train Station. In addition, <br />as shown on Figure 5.13-3, SCAG identifies that the Project site is within a High Quality Transit Area. As <br />such, the proposed Project is located on an infill site within a TPA as defined under Public Resources Code <br />Section 21099. Thus, the proposed Project’s parking impacts are not considered significant on the <br />environment pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21099. This comment will be forwarded to City <br />decision makers as part of the staff report for the Project. <br />Comment L12.5: This comment questions if this is a bargaining chip the developer is using to gain <br />approval for a somewhat smaller project. <br />Response L12.5: The comment does not raise any specific environmental concern with the analysis within <br />the Draft SEIR and presents the commenter’s opinion and speculation This comment will be forwarded to <br />City decision makers as part of the staff report for the Project. <br />27 <br /> <br /> <br />City Council 22 – 673 9/17/2024
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.