|
Table 3. Option 3; Calendar Year 2013 Capacity Charge
<br />Peak Day Demand cts
<br />(May 1 through September 30)
<br />Rate ($Icfs):
<br />Calendar Year
<br />$6,500
<br />Calendar Year
<br />2013 Capacity
<br />AGENCY
<br />2009
<br />2010
<br />2011
<br />3-Year Peak
<br />Charge
<br />Anaheim
<br />407
<br />44.8
<br />39.3
<br />44.8
<br />$291,200
<br />Beverly Hills
<br />31.0
<br />31.2
<br />31.5
<br />31.5
<br />$204,750
<br />Burbank
<br />21.6
<br />22.3
<br />21.4
<br />22.3
<br />$144,950
<br />Calleguas
<br />192.8
<br />208.9
<br />210.1
<br />210.1
<br />$1,365,660
<br />Central Basin
<br />94.7
<br />74.2
<br />79.2
<br />94.7
<br />$615,550
<br />Compton
<br />6.9
<br />3.3
<br />2.4
<br />5.9
<br />$38,350
<br />Eastern
<br />233.8
<br />229.6
<br />192.5
<br />233.8
<br />$1,519,700
<br />Foothill
<br />24.3
<br />20.2
<br />19.0
<br />24.3
<br />$157,950
<br />Fullerton
<br />37.4
<br />32.2
<br />27.4
<br />37A
<br />$243,100
<br />Glendale
<br />56.0
<br />49.6
<br />49.0
<br />56.0
<br />$364,000
<br />Inland Empire
<br />106.1
<br />124.2
<br />138.0
<br />138.0
<br />$897,000
<br />Las Virgenes
<br />42.7
<br />43.9
<br />43A
<br />43.9
<br />$285,350
<br />Long Beach
<br />67.2
<br />61.2
<br />51.5
<br />67.2
<br />$436,800
<br />Los Angeles
<br />698.2
<br />525.9
<br />329.0
<br />698.2
<br />$4,638,300
<br />MWDOC
<br />489.5
<br />425.5
<br />382.7
<br />489,5
<br />$3,181.750
<br />Pasadena
<br />50.2
<br />50.5
<br />50.6
<br />50.6
<br />$328,900
<br />San Diego
<br />1'0553
<br />949.5
<br />760.7
<br />1,055.3
<br />$6,859,450
<br />San Fernando
<br />-
<br />4.1
<br />1.6
<br />4.1
<br />$26,650
<br />San Marino
<br />3.5
<br />4.2
<br />1.3
<br />4.2
<br />$27,300
<br />Santa Ana
<br />16.4
<br />20.0
<br />20.0
<br />20.0
<br />$130,000
<br />Santa Monica
<br />25.0
<br />24.3
<br />21.1
<br />25.0
<br />$162,500
<br />Three VaUays
<br />132.7
<br />139A
<br />122.7
<br />139.4
<br />$906,100
<br />Torrance
<br />39.3
<br />42.8
<br />35.5
<br />42.8
<br />$278,200
<br />Upper San Gabriel
<br />27.6
<br />22.9
<br />20.4
<br />27.6
<br />$179,400
<br />West Basin
<br />221.3
<br />221.2
<br />214.6
<br />221.3
<br />$1,438,450
<br />Western
<br />214.4
<br />199.5 1
<br />179.3
<br />214.4
<br />$1,393,600
<br />Total
<br />r 3,927,E 1
<br />3,676.4 1
<br />3,044.21
<br />4,002.31
<br />$26,014,950
<br />Totals may not fool due to rounding
<br />Section 7. That the capacity charge for each member public agency, the method of its
<br />calculation, cost allocations and other data used in its determination are as specified in the General Manager's
<br />recommendation on rates and charges to be effective January 1, 2013, and the corresponding cost of service
<br />report. Such recommendation and cost of service report are on file and available for review by interested parties
<br />at Metropolitan's headquarters.
<br />Section S. That the General Manager and the General Counsel are hereby authorized to do all
<br />things necessary and desirable to accomplish the purposes of this Resolution, including, without limitation, the
<br />commencement or defense of litigation.
<br />Section 9. That this Board finds that the proposed capacity charge is not defined as a Project
<br />under the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") since it involves continuing administrative activities,
<br />such as general policy and procedure making (Section 15378(b)(2) of the State CEQA Guidelines), In addition,
<br />the proposed action is not subject to CEQA because it involves the creation of government funding mechanisms
<br />
|