My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Correspondence - #21
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2024
>
09/17/2024
>
Correspondence - #21
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/3/2024 4:05:12 PM
Creation date
9/16/2024 11:04:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Item #
21
Date
9/17/2024
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
119
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
September 17, 2024 <br />Via e-mail <br />Members of the Santa Ana City Council <br />Re: Agenda Item 21- Request that the City Council REJECT the resolution <br />supporting Proposition 36 <br />Honorable Members of the Santa Ana City Council: <br />ACLU of Southern California urges you to oppose the resolution to support Proposition 36, the <br />mass incarceration measure that will appear on the California Ballot in November. <br />Proposition 36 is wrong for the city of Santa Ana, and harmful to the state of California. It is an <br />extreme measure that will divert funds from crime victims, schools, and drug treatment programs <br />straight to California prisons. Disguised as a retail theft measure, the prison spending initiative <br />would impose draconian criminal penalties, including possible prison time, for low-level drug - <br />related offenses — returning California to an era of costly mass incarceration and <br />dangerously overcrowded prisons. <br />Perhaps most importantly, Proposition 36 will not solve the problem it claims to address. <br />"Prop. 36 is not the solution; it's a step backward," according to Santa Clara County District <br />Attorney Jeff Rosen. As this Vera Institute analysis explains, Proposition 36 will roll back <br />Proposition 47, which in 10 years has been wildly successful by any measure at both reducing <br />incarceration while also reducing crime. Proposition 36 will be a major step backwards. <br />For all these reasons and more, Proposition 36 is opposed by Governor Newsom, the California <br />Democratic Party, League of Women Voters, Speaker Robert Rivas, Senate Pro Tem Mike <br />McGuire, California Nurses Association, California Teachers Association, National Union of <br />Healthcare Workers, Disability Rights California, SEIU, and Smart Justice CA. <br />Our communities are facing very real challenges that deserve real solutions. But Proposition 36 is <br />not that solution. <br />Sincerely, <br />Jacob Reisberg <br />Senior Policy Counsel <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.