Laserfiche WebLink
MEMORANDUM <br />To: Mike Lopez <br />Date: <br />From: Robert Gomes <br />Subject: MONTHLY WATER MANAGEMENT REPORT - JUNE 1995 <br />I. Data collection e+ction sates <br />ATTACHMENT C <br />July 19, 1995 <br />The data contained in this report was derived from 41 <br />Calsense irrigation controllers of which 19 are centrally <br />controlled units (via phone line and modem) and 22 are <br />"stand alone', units. Data from "stand alone'$ units is <br />collected with a lap top computer (via direct wire access) <br />at the controller. <br />II. Water savin s from moistu a seLagjaq <br />DUNE 1995 savings: <br />$is 852 <br />Gallons: 11458,276 <br />The ETo for June 1995 was 5.41 inches compared to the ETo <br />for May 1995 which was 5.39 inches. The ETo for June 1995 and <br />May 1995 were nearly equal as were the total actual <br />gallons <br />used for each month. The equality of usage is consistent with <br />the rate of ETo for the two months , this is very good ; <br />however, if we do not know how many inches of water we applied <br />Per sq. ft., then we do not know exactly how well We are <br />managing our water. In summary We could have applied much <br />more than the measured ETo 5.40 inches making us appear <br />excessive in theory. The equality between May and June appears <br />to be a positive usage pattern. <br />In looking back at June 1994 our actual irrigation applied <br />was 1,147,466 gallons compared with June 1995 were our usage <br />was 4,078,125 gallons. since June 1994 we <br />controllers to the June 1995 report. Also The dfhave added e <br />1994 was a transitional period between the changing Ofwater <br />managers. <br />III. Water savin s due to overflow rotection <br />The month of June saw no significant savings from overflow <br />protection. <br />CS N1W 13 <br />