My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 26 - Public Hearing Regarding Bristol Project
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2024
>
10/01/2024
>
Item 26 - Public Hearing Regarding Bristol Project
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/25/2024 12:33:51 PM
Creation date
9/25/2024 8:40:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
26
Date
10/1/2024
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1144
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Response to Comment L16: Pete dated August 12, 2024 <br />Comment L16.1: This comment states that the Applicant is proposing funds for low-income housing and <br />other funds for community benefit and that the areas around the Project will be greatly impacted by the <br />Project. The comment states that the commenter feels that the area and City will benefit from sensible <br />development. The comment states that previous development agreements were not delivered as promised <br />(per the attached document). <br />Response L16.1: This comment does not provide substantial evidence of a significant environmental impact <br />or provide any comments on the Draft or Final SEIR. CEQA is an environmental protection statute that is <br />concerned with physical changes to the environment (CEQA Guidelines Section 15358(b)). The environment <br />includes land, air, water, minerals, flora, fauna, ambient noise, and objects of historic or aesthetic <br />significance (CEQA Guidelines Section 15360). The Project's potential economic and social effects are not <br />considered effects on the environment (CEQA Guidelines Sections 15064(e) and 151 31(a)). Thus, consistent <br />with CEQA, the Draft Supplemental EIR includes an analysis of the Project's potentially significant physical <br />impacts on the environment and does not include substantial discussion of the Project's economic or social <br />effects, such as economic effects related to the development agreement. This comment will be forwarded <br />to City decision -makers as part of the staff report for the Project. <br />Comment L16.2: This comment states that the EIR reports that the traffic will increase in the area by 260 <br />percent and that the Project will make congestion worse. The comment states that portions of Macarthur <br />Boulevard are not ADA compliant and people with disabilities are forced into the streets. <br />The comment states that the flow of construction traffic is not discussed in the EIR and that residents will be <br />impacted by construction trucks, commuters and increased noise, gas emissions, hazards and hazardous <br />wastes. The comment states that the commenter would like to have better details on the mitigation of those <br />effects. <br />The comment asks what the queuing on Macarthur Boulevard for Greenville Fundamental School would <br />look like. <br />Response L16.2: This comment does not provide substantial evidence of a significant environmental impact. <br />The Draft SEIR Section 5.13, Transportation, details that Senate Bill (SB) 743 changes include the <br />elimination of auto delay, LOS, and similar measures of vehicular capacity or traffic congestion as the basis <br />for determining significant impacts. As part of the 2019 amendments to the State CEQA Guidelines, SB <br />743 directed that the revised CEQA Guidelines "shall promote the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, <br />the development of multimodal transportation networks, and a diversity of land uses" (Public Resources <br />Code Section 21099[b][1 ]); and that "automobile delay, as described solely by level of service or similar <br />measures of vehicular capacity or traffic congestion, shall not be considered a significant impact on the <br />environment" (Public Resources Code Section 21099[b][21). As such, pursuant to Public Resources Code <br />Section 21099(b)(2), the Supplemental EIR is not required to analyze impacts related to traffic congestion <br />during construction or operation of the Project. <br />As discussed in Section 5.1, Air Quality, proposed Specific Plan Mitigation Measure AQ-1: Construction <br />Exhaust and Dust Control requires the preparation of a construction traffic control plan detailing the <br />locations of equipment staging areas, material stockpiles, proposed road closures, and hours of <br />construction operations, and designing the plan to minimize impacts to roads frequented by passenger cars, <br />pedestrians, bicyclist, and other non -truck traffic. As such, the Project would be required to follow a <br />designated construction route to avoid residential areas in the vicinity of the Project. <br />In regard to increased noise, gas emissions, hazards and hazardous waste, the commenter is referred to the <br />Draft SEIR's discussions in Section 5.1, Air Quality, Section 5.6, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, and <br />Section 5.9, Noise, which include thorough discussions of Project impacts on those topic areas and further <br />analysis of applicable mitigation measures, which would serve to reduce potential impacts. No further <br />response is warranted. <br />36 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.