My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Correspondence - PH #35
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2024
>
11/19/2024
>
Correspondence - PH #35
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/17/2024 5:14:27 PM
Creation date
11/13/2024 2:37:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Item #
35
Date
11/19/2024
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
211
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
M B dLL <br />would result in an increased trip length, as potential guests would have fewer options to stay as close as <br />possible to daily destinations during their stay in Santa Ana. <br />In addition, the number of trips taken by guests to and from their site of accommodation would be <br />higher for hotels than for short-term rentals, as evidenced by Institute of Transportation Engineers <br />(ITE), introducing additional vehicle miles traveled. Recreational Homes (ITE Land Use Code 260) have <br />an average weekday trip generation rate of 3.55 trips per day while the Hotel land use (ITE Land Use <br />310) has 7.99 trips per day. This increase in trips may be due to the need to leave the hotel for <br />amenities, such as food, and increased worker trips. <br />The increase in mobile emissions associated with short-term rentals compared to hotels is presented <br />below in Table 1. Based on publicly available statistics on the current Airbnb listings in Santa Ana, the <br />average capacity per STR is 5.6 people and there are approximately 1,000 active Airbnb listings.3 This <br />results in a service population of 5,600 people. As a result of the potential STR ban, this would require <br />1,867 hotel rooms to accommodate this same service population assuming one hotel room has a <br />capacity of 3 people. The number of peak daily trips was estimated using the ITE trip rates for STRs and <br />hotel rooms and the number of STRs and hotel rooms required to serve the same population. The <br />number of daily miles traveled was estimated assuming a single trip to a hotel is 2 miles longer than a <br />single trip to a STR since guests might have to stay farther from daily destinations if they stay at a <br />hotel. These assumptions were used to determine daily mobile emissions. <br />Mobile emissions from visitors staying at a hotel would generate up to 444 percent more criteria air <br />pollutant emissions and GHGs than from visitors staying at an STR.4 Therefore, the ban has the <br />potential to considerably increase emissions in the area. The increase in VMT and greenhouse gas <br />emissions is directly inconsistent with regional and state goals to reduce VMT and greenhouse gas <br />emissions from vehicle trips. <br />Additional calculation details can be found in Appendix A. <br />Table 1. Emissions Increase due to Additional VMT <br />Criteria Air Pollutant <br />Percent Increase in daily mobile <br />emissions from STR to hotel to serve <br />the same population <br />VOC <br />442% <br />NOx <br />443% <br />CO <br />443% <br />sox <br />444% <br />PM io <br />444% <br />PM2.5 <br />444% <br />GHG (CO2e) <br />443% <br />https://app.airbtics.com/airbnb-data/united-states/CA/santa%20ana <br />This percent increase is independent of the number of short-term rentals in Santa Ana. The number of short-term <br />rentals and population are provided for illustrative purposes only. <br />4/14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.