My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 35 - Public Hearing - Short Term Rentals Ordinance
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2024
>
11/19/2024
>
Item 35 - Public Hearing - Short Term Rentals Ordinance
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/15/2024 9:00:14 AM
Creation date
11/15/2024 8:51:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
35
Date
11/19/2024
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
77
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY OF SANTA ANA SHORT-TERM RENTAL PROHIBITION ORDINANCE <br />CITY OF SANTA ANA <br />4. Evaluation of Environmental Impacts <br />Page 44 PlaceWorks <br />The increase in residents would increase the demand for library services; however, project-specific analysis with <br />developmental fees and adherence to GP goals and policies and RR LS-1 would result in a less than significant <br />impact (GP EIR p. 5.14-46–5.15-47). <br />Analysis of the Modified Project <br />The Modified Project would expressly prohibit STRs and only affect existing structures. The Modified Project <br />would not require development, redevelopment, or changes to existing development types in the city. The <br />Modified Project would not introduce new residential units to the city nor directly or indirectly increase the <br />city’s population. The GP buildout, which includes the residential units illegally operating as STRs, and <br />operation of the Approved Project were adequately analyzed in the GP EIR. The Modified Project would not <br />change the significance conclusions in the GP EIR. No impacts would occur. The Modified Project would not <br />result in any new or more severe significant impacts than those identified in the GP EIR. <br />GP EIR RR FP-1, RR SS-1, and LS-1 are not applicable to the Modified Project because the Modified Project <br />does not require construction to be implemented. <br />The Modified Project would not obstruct the City’s ability to implement applicable GP policies. <br />4.16 RECREATION <br />According to Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines, a project would normally have a significant effect on the <br />environment if the project would: <br />REC-1 Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other <br />recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or <br />be accelerated? <br />REC-2 Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of <br />recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? <br />Summary of Impacts in the GP EIR <br />As discussed in Section 5.15, Recreation, of the GP EIR, buildout of the Approved Project would lead to <br />additional demands on parks and recreational facilities (GP EIR p. 5.15-11–5.15-30). The GP EIR concluded <br />that although funding sources for new parks and equipment would be sufficient, there is a lack of available land <br />to develop new parks or expand existing facilities, and thus the Approved Project would exacerbate an existing <br />shortage of recreation facilities. After compliance with regulatory requirements and implementation of the GP <br />policies, impacts would be significant and unavoidable. <br />Additionally, construction and/or expansion of new parks and recreation facilities could result in adverse <br />physical effects on the environment. Therefore, the GP EIR concluded, with the incorporation of GP policies, <br />the Approved Project would have a significant and unavoidable impact on recreation. <br />Exhibit 3 - Environmental Analysis
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.