My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 34 - Public Hearing - Appeal Application No. 2024-01 for Construction of a 23’-4” Tall Accessory Building (2221 N Heliotrope Drive)
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2024
>
11/19/2024
>
Item 34 - Public Hearing - Appeal Application No. 2024-01 for Construction of a 23’-4” Tall Accessory Building (2221 N Heliotrope Drive)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/15/2024 10:01:45 AM
Creation date
11/15/2024 8:51:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
34
Date
11/19/2024
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
236
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ocampo, Nuvia <br />From: <br />Ed Murashie <emurashie@att.net> <br />Sent: <br />Monday, August 26, 2024 2:46 PM <br />To: <br />eComments, PBA <br />Subject: <br />August 8, 2024 Hearing Re: Request for Variance at historic "Maharaja" house <br />Attention: This email originated from outside of City of Santa Ana. Use caution when opening attachments or links. <br />Hello, I am Ed Murashie, Floral Park resident and Historic Resources Vice Chairman. <br />I want to go on record opposing the variance and to share an image. <br />The Maharaja house was built by the Maharaja of Indore, a wealthy Hindu prince, for his five year old daughter as a <br />place to grow up safe. The "palace" was highlighted in the Santa Ana Daily Register dated December 15, 1938. It is the <br />ONLY royal palace built on the United States mainland. It is listed on the Santa Ana Register of Historic Properties as <br />Landmark and the owners benefit from the Mills Act tax savings. It is also featured in the Floral Park National and State <br />Historic District application. <br />In our Historic Resource Commission meetings we talk about the term view corridor. The meeting packet shows <br />conceptual renderings from Santa Clara (side of the house) and from the backyard on page 86 and 87 of 197. But more <br />importantly it does not show from the front of the house. It is this view corridor from the sidewalk in front -left of the <br />house that will shows both the Moderne architectural style and part of Vietnamese pavilion seemingly joined but <br />offset. You can see this on page 84 of the meeting packet and shown below. This is the main reason I oppose the <br />variance. I don't want the grandeur of a royal palace fighting with a Vietnamese pavilion. <br />Best Regards, Ed <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.