Laserfiche WebLink
2 <br />opening of a cultural center with a 21 foot accessory structure as one of many exhibits on a Mills Act property <br />may need to be reviewed for compliance. <br /> <br />Finally, as someone who has supported the City's efforts to preserve our urban forest, I am concerned about the <br />new proposed location of the tower close to the parkway trees on Santa Clara. <br />4) I request that the Planning Commission refer the matter to the City Arborist, Tree Maintenance Team, <br />Public Works Department, to review the project for its potential impact on nearby City Parkway trees. <br /> <br />Thank you for your consideration of these requests. I will not be able to attend the hearing or to review the <br />updated agenda and records when they are posted on the website, and appreciate the opportunity to send my <br />written comments as well as renewed and updated requests based on the information currently available. <br /> <br />Sincerely, <br /> <br />Mrs. Ellen Koldewey <br />N Heliotrope Drive <br />Santa Ana CA 92706 <br /> <br />----- Forwarded Message ----- <br />From: . <emkold@aol.com> <br />To: PBAecomments@santa-ana.org <PBAecomments@santa-ana.org> <br />Sent: Monday, March 28, 2022, 3:55:02 PM PDT <br />Subject: Re: Conditional Use Permit No. 2022-06 Project Location: 2221 N Heliotrope Drive <br /> <br />Proposed Project: The CUP Applicant is requesting approval of Conditional Use Permit (CUP) No. 2022- <br />06 to allow the construction of an accessory structure 23’ – 4” (reduced to c. 21 feet) in height within the rear <br />yard of an existing single-family residence located at 2221 North Heliotrope Drive. Pursuant to Section <br />41-232.5 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code (SAMC), accessory buildings more than fifteen feet in height or <br />more than one story require approval of a CUP. <br /> <br />My Requested Actions: <br /> <br />1) Postpone the hearing, and remand the matter to the Planning Department for additional Findings <br />of Fact to show compliance with standards of SAMC Section 41-638; or <br />2) Deny the resolution approving Conditional Use Permit No. 2022-06 as conditioned due to insufficient <br />evidence to show compliance with standards of SAMC Section 41-638; and <br />3) Refer the matter to the Historic Resources Commission for review as required by the Mills Act; <br /> <br /> **************************************************************************************************************** <br />******************************************************************************************** <br /> <br /> <br />Greetings Planning Commission, <br /> <br />I respectfully request that the Planning Commission postpone making a decision on this matter. You have <br />insufficient accurate information to make an informed decision to grant a conditional use permit (CUP) under <br />the Municipal Code as the record does not yet establish compliance with Sec. 41-638 (Standards for <br />granting applications). <br /> <br />I urge you to remand this matter back to the Planning Department with instructions to make complete and <br />accurate findings of fact about the possible adverse effects of the proposed and actual intended use of the <br />oversize pavilion on the surrounding neighborhood of Floral Park and to publish any revised findings of fact to   <br />  <br />City Council 34 – 193 11/19/2024