My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packet_2024-11-19
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2024
>
11/19/2024
>
Agenda Packet_2024-11-19
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2024 8:48:28 AM
Creation date
11/19/2024 8:40:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Clerk of the Council
Date
11/19/2024
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1216
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br />Ocampo, Nuvia <br />From:STACEY KATO <stacey.leslie@sbcglobal.net> <br />Sent:Sunday, August 25, 2024 6:42 PM <br />To:eComments, PBA <br />Subject:Conditional Use Permit No. 2022-06 <br />Follow Up Flag:Follow up <br />Flag Status:Flagged <br /> Attention: This email originated from outside of City of Santa Ana. Use caution when opening attachments or links. <br />I am writing regarding Conditional Use Permit No. 2022‐06 (CUP) seeking approval under Section 41‐232.5 of <br />the Santa Ana Municipal Code for the construction of a 23’ 4” accessory structure (Vietnamese pagoda) at <br />2221 North Heliotrope Drive (Maharajah House). <br />I have lived in Floral Park since 1998. I have always endeavored to maintain the historical integrity of both our <br />residence and the land surrounding our residence‐this is what originally drew me to the neighborhood. <br />I would like to go on record as opposing the approval of this CUP for a number of reasons including: <br />1. The Maharajah House is historically significant due to both its Art Moderne architecture as well as <br />its provenance. The several existing accessory structures currently on the property, such as the garden <br />house, are not consistent with the Art Moderne style and detract from the House’s historical Landmark <br />designation. <br />2. The several existing accessory structures are already more than adequate for a property of this <br />size. <br />3. The 23’ 4” height of the pagoda is not consistent with the architecture on Heliotrope in terms of <br />both design and height. The pagoda’s height would significantly exceed the proximate six foot high <br />fence surrounding the property. Further, approval of this CUP would have a significant, negative <br />impact on the aesthetics on the surrounding areas of the neighborhood. <br />4. The approval of this CUP would establish a dangerous precedent providing tacit permission to <br />other residents to do the same. <br /> In addition, the current owners of the Maharajah House have shown a proclivity to violate the statutory <br />requirements of being designated as an historical Landmark property as well as violating Santa Ana Municipal <br />Codes. This includes: <br />1. The unauthorized replacement of the roof on the swim house in the back yard. <br />2. The use of termite tenting to conceal the unauthorized removal and replacement of the iron <br />casement windows original to the property. <br />Lastly, the current owners continue to push for the recharacterization of this property as a cultural center‐ <br />hence the continued addition of accessory structures to the property. On many occasions there have been <br /> <br /> <br />City Council 34 – 204 11/19/2024
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.