My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Correspondence - Item #15
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2024
>
12/03/2024
>
Correspondence - Item #15
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/3/2024 3:06:38 PM
Creation date
12/2/2024 3:22:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
15
Date
12/3/2024
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
220
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 30. STRs have further helped make housing affordable for those who are able to"house <br /> 2 hack"and earn money by renting portions of their houses, or the entire house, for a period of time. <br /> 3 They have made homeownership possible for many who otherwise could not afford the high cost <br /> 4 of housing and would be pushed out of the market. <br /> 5 STRs Have Long Legally Operated in Santa Ana <br /> 6 31. STRs have operated legally in the City for decades. The City acknowledged the <br /> 7 operation of STRs within its boundaries for years. For instance, on September 15, 2015, the City <br /> 8 Council implemented "an emergency ordinance adopting a 45-day temporary moratorium on the <br /> 9 establishment or expansion of any short term residential rental use." Ordinance No. NS-2886. <br /> 10 This ordinance acknowledged that "[t]he current provisions of the Santa Ana Municipal Code [] <br /> 11 do not clearly identify short-term residential rental uses or take into account the potential impacts <br /> 12 associated with the establishment of STRs within existing residential zones. As such, provisions <br /> 13 of . . . the Code . . . require review, study, and possible revision in order to respond to recent <br /> 14 concerns relating to the impacts of these short-term rental uses in the City." Id., Section LB <br /> 15 (emphasis added). Importantly, the emergency ordinance specially provided: "No short-term <br /> 16 residential rental is permitted in a residential zone as defined in Article I of Chapter 41 of the <br /> 17 Code." Id., Section 2. This new prohibition would not have been necessary had STRs not been <br /> 18 an existing lawful use in the City. <br /> 19 32. On October 20, 2015, the City Council considered a recommendation to extend the <br /> 20 moratorium adopted on September 15, 2015, but it declined to do so. <br /> 21 33. On information and belief, the review and study contemplated in the adoption of <br /> 22 the September 15, 2015, emergency ordinance never materialized. And, following expiration of <br /> 23 the emergency ordinance in 2015 the City issued ministerial business licenses for STRs including <br /> 24 specifically to many of the Rental Alliance's members. <br /> 25 34. In December 2021, the City adopted an ordinance that specifically regulated STRs <br /> 26 on a very small category of properties in the City referred to as "urban lot splits." Specifically, <br /> 27 Ordinance No. NS-3013 amended the Municipal Code to include the following language: "No <br /> 28 short-term vacation rentals (STRs). No dwelling unit on a lot that is created by an urban lot split <br /> VERTFTED PETTTTON FOR WRTT OF MANDATE <br /> 9 AND COMPLATNT <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.