My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Correspondence - Item #15
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2024
>
12/03/2024
>
Correspondence - Item #15
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/3/2024 3:06:38 PM
Creation date
12/2/2024 3:22:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
15
Date
12/3/2024
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
220
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I rentals; they are a quintessential residential use. In short, "[a] `residential building' is used for <br /> 2 human habitation without regard to length of occupancy,"and"[i]t is possible to reside somewhere <br /> 3 for a night, a week, or a lifetime." Id. at 149. The Court of Appeal had previously reached a <br /> 4 similar conclusion in People v. Venice Suites, LLC, 71 Cal. App. 5th 715, 732- 34 (2021), where <br /> 5 it rejected an argument proffered by the City of Los Angeles that, because its municipal code did <br /> 6 not expressly authorize STRs, they must be prohibited. The court rejected that argument, in part, <br /> 7 because "no length of occupancy requirement is expressed" in the city's code. <br /> 8 38. On information and belief, the City never explained how the apparently new <br /> 9 position it began taking in or around 2022 that existing STRs were prohibited by the Municipal <br /> 10 Code could be squared with the California Court of Appeal's decisions or with its prior actions. <br /> 11 The Citv Council Adopts the Emergency Ordinance and First Reading of Ordinance No. <br /> 12 NS-3061 in April 2024 <br /> 13 39. On December 11, 2023, the Santa Ana City Planning Commission presented a <br /> 14 "Work Study Session"on the regulation of STRs in the City. On information and belief,following <br /> 15 that meeting, the Planning Commission reached out to certain hosts requesting suggestions and/or <br /> 16 comments on a proposed STR program in Santa Ana. <br /> 17 40. Without further discussion or outreach, in late-March 2024—on Thursday, March <br /> 18 28 (just three days before Easter)—the City posted an agenda that it would consider at its April 2, <br /> 19 2024, meeting (a) an Urgency Ordinance banning all STRs "effective immediately" and (b) <br /> 20 Ordinance No.NS-3061 banning all STRs in the City 30 days after the effective date. The hearing <br /> 21 was scheduled for the Tuesday after Easter while many families would be on spring break. <br /> 22 41. The City claimed authority to adopt the Urgency Ordinance, pursuant to Sections <br /> 23 415 and 417 of the City Charter. Section 415 of the City Charter provides that the City Council <br /> 24 can adopt an ordinance that it declares to be "necessary as an emergency measure for preserving <br /> 25 the public peace, health, or safety, and containing a statement of the reasons for its urgency" by a <br /> 26 two-thirds vote of the members of City Council. Santa Ana Mun. Code, § 415. Despite having <br /> 27 allowed the September 2015 emergency ordinance to expire 45-days later, and despite, on <br /> 28 information and belief, never having never undertaken the review and analysis that the September <br /> VERTFTED PETTTTON FOR WRTT OF MANDATE <br /> 11 AND COMPLATNT <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.