My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Correspondence - Item #15
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2024
>
12/03/2024
>
Correspondence - Item #15
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/3/2024 3:06:38 PM
Creation date
12/2/2024 3:22:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
15
Date
12/3/2024
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
220
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SANTA ANA <br /> TR <br /> December 2, 2024 ALLIANCE <br /> EC�EME <br /> VIA EMAIL ecommentnsanta-ana.org <br /> Mayor Valerie Amezcua <br /> Mayor Pro Tem Thai Viet Phan <br /> Councilmember Benjamin Vazquez <br /> Councilmember Jessie Lopez <br /> Councilmember Phil Bacerra <br /> Councilmember Johnathan Ryan Hernandez <br /> Councilmember David Penaloza <br /> Santa Ana City Council <br /> City Council Chamber <br /> 20 Civic Center Plaza M-30 <br /> Santa Ana, CA 92701 <br /> Re: December 3, 2024, City Council Meeting—Item 15: Second Reading of Ordinance <br /> Amendment No. 2024-04 Prohibiting Short-Term Rentals <br /> Dear Mayor Amezcua, Mayor Pro Tem Phan, and Honorable City Councilmembers, <br /> On behalf of the Santa Ana Short-Term Rental Alliance, I am writing to respectfully request that <br /> you reconsider proceeding with the second reading of the proposed ordinance to reenact a ban on <br /> short-term rentals at your meeting on December 3. We at SASTRA fully support the reasonable <br /> regulation of STRs in Santa Ana. Unfortunately, the City's plan to readopt a legally flawed STR <br /> ban—based on clear misinterpretation of the law and without any meaningful engagement with <br /> either hosts or residents that rely on STRs for transitory housing—highlights a failure in the <br /> legislative process. <br /> At the November 19 hearing, Councilmember Bacerra and Mayor Amezcua both raised concerns <br /> with the STR ban and encouraged Staff to return with more nuanced regulations for STRs in the <br /> future. That did not occur—the current proposal merely readopts the flawed ban with no <br /> meaningful changes. Indeed, Councilmember Lopez specifically asked Staff if the Council should <br /> consider any new information in light of public comments. Staff responded"no" and did not even <br /> mention our attorneys' 171-page letter with detailed technical analysis by experts demonstrating <br /> the ban's potentially significant health, transportation, and environmental impacts. <br /> The City Council must pause before its December 3 meeting to correct missteps that began in April <br /> to enact a law that: (1) severely infringes on constitutional rights and California law, (2)results in <br /> significant environmental impacts, (3) creates economic hardship, and (4) disproportionately <br /> affects those most in need of flexible housing options. A brief recap of the events is summarized <br /> here for your awareness: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.