Laserfiche WebLink
iCAJA Environmental Services, LLC <br /> 9410 Topanga Canyon Blvd.,Suite 101 <br /> Chatsworth,CA 91311 <br /> Phone 310-469-6700 Fax 310-806-9801 <br /> policies, such as the Climate Change Scoping Plan, SCAG's Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable <br /> Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS), and any other local plans and/or policies. <br /> Reducing GHG emissions is critical to helping improve air resources and minimize the impacts of climate <br /> change. Due to the significance of this issue and the complexity of GHG emissions calculations, which <br /> require complex technical expertise and knowledge of existing and potential sources, an expert study <br /> conducted by recognized climate and emissions specialist using established emission methodologies <br /> should be prepared to support the City's GHG emissions impact analysis. <br /> The City should also prepare an analysis to quantify the GHG emissions generated from constructing these <br /> new facilities. This analysis should be prepared using CalEEMod and based on specific parameters for the <br /> proposed new uses being constructed (including size of the new use as well construction schedule, <br /> construction equipment, amount of grading, amount of hauling, etc.). Likewise, operational emissions of <br /> GHGs should be quantified using CalEEMod. The City has used a screening threshold of 3,000 MTCO2e <br /> for GHG emissions. Therefore, the results from CalEEMod should then be compared to this significance <br /> threshold to determine whether impacts would be significant. <br /> Hazards & Hazardous Materials <br /> Overview <br /> An STR ban may significantly impact related to hazards and hazardous materials from the reasonably <br /> foreseeable construction of new hotels to accommodate patrons who would have previously utilized STRs. <br /> The Addendum fails to address any of these potential impacts, concluding without supporting evidence <br /> that the Proposed Ordinance would "only affect existing structures" and therefore, there would be no <br /> change in hazards and hazardous materials impacts beyond those identified in the GP PEIR. (Staff Report, <br /> Exhibit 3, p. 35.) This is inadequate. <br /> The Analysis in the Addendum Fails to Address Potentially Significant Impacts <br /> The Addendum's analysis of hazards and hazardous materials impacts is insufficient, finding that the <br /> STR ban would only affect existing structures, and "is not anticipated to result in physical impacts to the <br /> environment." (Staff Report, Exhibit 3, p. 35.) This analysis lacks any consideration of the reasonably <br /> foreseeable construction of new hotels from an STR ban which could result in potentially significant <br /> impacts to hazards and hazardous materials. <br /> Construction of New Hotels <br /> Development of new hotels has potential to result in impacts from hazards and hazardous materials <br /> present in the locations identified in the General Plan for new hotel accommodations. As discussed in the <br /> Addendum, the City includes 555 hazardous materials sites, with 63 active or open sites. (Staff Report, <br /> Exhibit 3, p. 34.) The City has not established a baseline condition for hazards and hazardous materials <br /> and should explain what hazardous materials are present at the locations for potential hotel development. <br /> The City should then explain how hazardous materials will be managed during construction and operation <br /> of new hotels. The City also has not explained the baseline condition of contamination at the locations for <br /> new hotel development, so the current condition of site soil, soil gas, and groundwater is not clear. The <br /> 24 <br />