My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Correspondence - Item #15
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2024
>
12/03/2024
>
Correspondence - Item #15
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/3/2024 3:06:38 PM
Creation date
12/2/2024 3:22:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
15
Date
12/3/2024
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
220
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
iCAJA Environmental Services, LLC <br /> 9410 Topanga Canyon Blvd.,Suite 101 <br /> Chatsworth,CA 91311 <br /> Phone 310-469-6700 Fax 310-806-9801 <br /> constructed (including size and placement of the new use as well construction schedule, construction <br /> equipment, amount of grading, amount of hauling, etc.). The increase in noise from construction should <br /> then be compared against the threshold to determine whether the increase in noise is greater than the <br /> threshold, in which case there would be a potentially significant impact. The likelihood of significant impacts <br /> increases where there are sensitive uses (such as residences) in close proximity to construction. If <br /> potentially significant impacts have been identified, mitigation measures, if feasible, would need to be <br /> provided to reduce impacts to less than significant. If feasible mitigation is not available (which for noise, <br /> it often is not feasible), impacts could be significant. <br /> Regarding construction vibration impacts, depending on the proximity of adjacent sensitive receptors, an <br /> analysis should be prepared to quantify projected vibration levels from construction of new replacement <br /> facilities. For example, if a new hotel is constructed in an area adjacent to a historical or archaeological <br /> resource, the City must evaluate whether there could be building damage caused to those resources. The <br /> increase in vibration from construction should be compared against the applicable thresholds for both <br /> building damage and human annoyance to determine whether the increase in vibration is greater than the <br /> threshold, in which case there would be a potentially significant impact. The likelihood of significant impacts <br /> increases where there are sensitive uses (such as residences) in close proximity to construction. If <br /> potentially significant impacts have been identified, mitigation measures, if feasible, would need to be <br /> provided to reduce impacts to less than significant. It is likely that there would be feasible mitigation for <br /> building damage impacts (such as monitoring a building during vibration-producing activities). Conversely, <br /> it is difficult to mitigate human annoyance impacts beyond increasing the distance from the construction <br /> activity to the sensitive receptor. Therefore, if you have a sensitive receptor adjacent to vibration-producing <br /> construction activity, you could have a significant impact with respect to human annoyance. <br /> Operation of New Hotels <br /> All issues associated with the potential operational noise impacts from existing hotels apply to the City's <br /> failure to calculate potential noise impacts from operation of new hotels. Adding more hotels to the City's <br /> existing hotel stock would further concentrate traffic on roadways going to hotels in the area resulting in <br /> noise impacts above the City's General Plan Noise Element standard of 65 dBA CNEL, potentially <br /> exacerbating existing noise impacts or creating a new noise impact. (Ramboll Environmental Analysis, p. <br /> 9.) Further, it is possible that to avoid the potentially significant impacts associated with adding more hotels <br /> to the areas of the City that already have several hotels, new hotels would be constructed farther from a <br /> city center or tourist destination, resulting in greater urban sprawl and VMT, which could result in higher <br /> noise levels from increased traffic in these areas. These new hotels would also produce noise from <br /> mechanical equipment, parking facilities, loading docks, and amenity spaces. <br /> The City must evaluate the potential for noise complaints associated with operation of new hotels to <br /> determine whether there would be a significant impact. <br /> 29 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.