Laserfiche WebLink
would result in an increased trip length, as potential guests would have fewer options to stay as close as <br /> possible to daily destinations during their stay in Santa Ana. <br /> In addition, the number of trips taken by guests to and from their site of accommodation would be <br /> higher for hotels than for short-term rentals, as evidenced by Institute of Transportation Engineers <br /> (ITE), introducing additional vehicle miles traveled. Recreational Homes (ITE Land Use Code 260) have <br /> an average weekday trip generation rate of 3.55 trips per day while the Hotel land use (ITE Land Use <br /> 310) has 7.99 trips per day. This increase in trips may be due to the need to leave the hotel for <br /> amenities, such as food, and increased worker trips. <br /> The increase in mobile emissions associated with short-term rentals compared to hotels is presented <br /> below in Table 1. Based on publicly available statistics on the current Airbnb listings in Santa Ana, the <br /> average capacity per STR is 5.6 people and there are approximately 1,000 active Airbnb listings.3 This <br /> results in a service population of 5,600 people. As a result of the potential STR ban, this would require <br /> 1,867 hotel rooms to accommodate this same service population assuming one hotel room has a <br /> capacity of 3 people. The number of peak daily trips was estimated using the ITE trip rates for STRs and <br /> hotel rooms and the number of STRs and hotel rooms required to serve the same population. The <br /> number of daily miles traveled was estimated assuming a single trip to a hotel is 2 miles longer than a <br /> single trip to a STR since guests might have to stay farther from daily destinations if they stay at a <br /> hotel. These assumptions were used to determine daily mobile emissions. <br /> Mobile emissions from visitors staying at a hotel would generate up to 444 percent more criteria air <br /> pollutant emissions and GHGs than from visitors staying at an STR.4 Therefore, the ban has the <br /> potential to considerably increase emissions in the area. The increase in VMT and greenhouse gas <br /> emissions is directly inconsistent with regional and state goals to reduce VMT and greenhouse gas <br /> emissions from vehicle trips. <br /> Additional calculation details can be found in Appendix A. <br /> Table 1. Emissions Increase due to Additional VMT <br /> Percent Increase in daily mobile <br /> Criteria Air Pollutant emissions from STR to hotel to serve <br /> the same population <br /> VOC 442% <br /> N Ox 443% <br /> CO 443% <br /> Sox 444% <br /> PM10 444% <br /> P M i.s 444% <br /> GHG (COZe) 443% <br /> 3 https://app.airbtics.com/airbnb-data/united-states/CA/santa%20ana <br /> 4 This percent increase is independent of the number of short-term rentals in Santa Ana. The number of short-term <br /> rentals and population are provided for illustrative purposes only. <br /> 4/14 <br />