Laserfiche WebLink
s1ad�m '`_ <br /> f Anahei N Overall Percentile <br /> om <br /> m I; E z m <br /> I A,, g` I �..�' x <br /> z CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Results <br /> _ \ ■ <br /> Chr k.0.. — Menl��1yv j hapm.n Ave 90 100(High <br /> Orange --..E_ > est Scores) <br /> 'Ar Ahna id Ave - ■ >80 90 <br /> y <br /> I1umscn Ave nnmstmm ■>70 BO <br /> Rex `.o�i�. <br /> clan Grove X <br /> Garden Grove 22—.+_c '60 70 <br /> a <br /> — lden.Grove'FwY ❑ <br /> >50 60 <br /> F.aiiha <br /> m — rolemornl >40 SO <br /> P. <br /> Trask Av L e tea— m �anl.l Cl.�r�Are <br /> .mGaFdemcrove,Ewy z ■>30 40 <br /> N <br /> x <br /> ansbl _ 3 ■>20 30 <br /> `.Vee lm^sir Are rrla Melpla 17th S: LL <br /> c sans An S�0 ■>10 20 <br /> � c"veae q f <br /> m` - " i nJ'Ny a ■0.10(Lowest Scores) <br /> b'a HazaM Ave G fC,,arn4 z' cv�ceHer n 1� U, <br /> _In St W S-6 A H.J Santa Ana B.amsc <br /> 4ve -W-1s st _ 551 TO <br /> >F FI I — c+E!:hr.Ana['7{VC �. <br /> o SA <br /> 'N Ivt FaJ den Ave — N 'S' <br /> Santa An <br /> ud raau"r Ld r1jer Aue- m ', �n •>TusN�n F <br /> Go if c— <br /> Ailla Square Vv[Jiryui.,rt. EEdI J _er Ave e <br /> Req.-I Earl W.Sgaa ;I All.,w PI <br /> Regenal Park <br /> Cwlt Ceurra � I e�4i <br /> -Wnrner-Ave - -- 1 u' ydWarnerAve--N—r— 3� qn <br /> F;uu of ain _ _ <br /> x > <br /> .. r v. '" ✓. E Dyerfttl <br /> 'k <br /> I,Altcr Ave � Q'� � _V <br /> neo v tnsr tinI <br /> 1•c mouth Lega <br /> aJ'01v-r A, <br /> j - Plaet Anton Jiro <br /> y <br /> Gsler Ma �� 1-'405•MOWLn m4 e �a Irvine <br /> I�sa Verde lyelr 2O P k <br /> 9nt Baker St <br /> ab <br /> _range <br /> Figure 1. OEHHA CalEnviroScreen 4.0, Santa Ana, CA. Overall Percentile of Exposure and Burden. <br /> In Figure 2, the EJScreen-measured traffic proximity is expressed as the counts of vehicles per day <br /> divided by the distance between the vehicle(s) and tract, providing a percentile rank for total exposure. <br /> The data included demonstrates the extreme disparity for these near-freeway Santa Ana tracts, the <br /> same tracts in the Northeast and Southeast of Santa Ana where hotels are primarily located, as these <br /> tracts already experience among the most extreme traffic exposures in the state and country (Figure 2, <br /> the traffic proximity expressed as traffic volume and distance and displayed as state percentile by <br /> tract). These already traffic-exposure overburdened tracts risk further concentration of traffic from <br /> increased hotel use and potential new hotels (further discussed in Section 7). Therefore, the congestion <br /> and traffic density increases may be more impactful to this already overburdened area. <br /> 6/14 <br />