My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Correspondence - Item #15
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2024
>
12/03/2024
>
Correspondence - Item #15
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/3/2024 3:06:38 PM
Creation date
12/2/2024 3:22:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
15
Date
12/3/2024
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
220
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
more electricity and natural gas per person than STRs, as shown in Table 2 and in the CalEEMod output <br /> in Appendix B.9 <br /> Table 2. Operational Energy Use per Person <br /> Land Use Electricity Natural Gas <br /> kWh/yr/person kBTU/yr/person <br /> Hotel 6,773 13,974 <br /> Short Term Rentals 1,231 6,846 <br /> As a result of the increase in energy consumption when staying in a hotel instead of an STR, GHG <br /> emissions from energy consumption per person would increase by 179 percent. <br /> 6 An STR ban Will Increase Fossil Fuei Usag <br /> In addition, increased VMT would require greater reliance on fossil fuels to power vehicle trips. Even <br /> with California's policies to shift the vehicle fleet towards cleaner cars and trucks, vehicle usage will <br /> continue to rely on gasoline for car and truck trips for years to come. The STR ban therefore results in <br /> greater reliance on fossil fuels, inconsistent with regional and state climate policy. The estimated fuel <br /> use is summarized in Table 3 and utilizes the same assumptions from Table 1. Additional calculation <br /> details can be found in Appendix A. 10 <br /> Table 3. Daily Mobile Fuel Consumption <br /> Gasoline Diesel <br /> Land Use <br /> Gallons per day Gallons per day <br /> Hotels 6,916 197 <br /> Short Term Rentals 1,272 36 <br /> Percent Increase with Hotel Use 444% 447% <br /> 7 An STR Ban Could Concentrate Traffic Resulting in Potential Noise and Health <br /> Impacts <br /> The potential ban of short-term rentals in Santa Ana could result in concentrated traffic on roadways <br /> going to hotels in the area, which could have noise and health impacts to the surrounding land uses. As <br /> described above, removing short term rentals as a means for lodging in Santa Ana would result in <br /> visitors needing to rely on hotels for their stay. Currently, there are over 20 hotels in the city limits of <br /> Santa Ana and over half of them are located in one concentrated area in the southeastern part of the <br /> City along Highway 55. It can be assumed that if more people will need stay in hotels instead of STRs, <br /> then the traffic to this part of town would increase significantly as it is likely all of this traffic would be <br /> concentrated to the roadways surrounding the hotel zone area. In comparison, traffic caused from <br /> 9 The CalEEMod analysis is based on 134 dwelling units, which is the amount of STRs that would accommodate the <br /> same number of people as a 250 room hotel. However, the energy use per person and percent increase in GHG <br /> emission is independent of the absolute number of short-term rentals in Santa Ana. <br /> io The fuel usage is based on 1,000 STRs in Santa Ana. However, the percent increase is independent of the number <br /> of short-term rentals in Santa Ana. <br /> 8/14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.