2024-072 - Setting Adminstrative Fines for Violation the Municipal Code

Home Browse Search

TCRs exist in the plan area, and a California Historical Resources Information System search identified 23 archaeological resources within 0.5 miles of the plan area. Furthermore, the City consulted with Native American Tribes, and sensitive areas with TCR were identified. The GP EIR determined that tivith implementation of RR CUL-1, RRTRC-1, and MMs CUL-4 through CUL-7, impacts would be reduced to less than significant. Refer to Section 4.5, Caaltarral Resource , of this Addendum for reproduced GP EIR Mitigation Measures CUL-4 through CUL-7. Analysis of the Modified Project The Modified Project would expressly prohibit STRs and only affect existing structures. The Modified Project would not require development, redevelopment, or changes to existing development types in the city. Therefore, no earthwork or ground -disturbing activities would occur. The Modified Project would not change the significance conclusions in the GP EIR. No impacts would occur. The Modified Project would not result in any new or more severe significant impacts than those identified in the GP EIR. GP EIR RR TCR-1 and RR CUL-1 are not applicable to the Modified Project because the Modified Project does not require construction to be implemented. Additionally, the Modified Project would not obstruct the City's ability to implement applicable GP policies. It should be noted that GP EIR MMs CUL-4 d7ough CUL-7 are not applicable to the Modified Project because the Modified Project is not a development project. 4.19 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS According to Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines, a project would normally have a significant effect on the environment if the project would: U-1 Require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment or storm water drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects? U-2 Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future development during normal, dry and multiple dry years? U-3 Result in a determination by the waste water treatment provider, which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? U-4 Generate solid waste in excess of state or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals? U-5 Comply with federal, state, and Iocal management and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid waste? Resolution No. 2024-072 Page 57 of 67