My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 30 - Uncodified Ordinance Amending the List of Parcels
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2024
>
12/17/2024
>
Item 30 - Uncodified Ordinance Amending the List of Parcels
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/12/2024 11:54:43 AM
Creation date
12/11/2024 9:44:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
30
Date
12/17/2027
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
292
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ordinance to Revise Local AB 2011 Implementing Ordinance <br />December 17, 2024 <br />Page 2 <br />Assembly Bill 2243 (AB 2243), signed into law by the Governor on September 19, 2024, <br />will take effect on January 1, 2025. AB 2243 makes certain changes to AB 2011 site <br />eligibility criteria and development standards. The changes will result in a number of sites <br />that were previously not eligible for AB 2011 streamlined, ministerial approval and, thus, <br />not contemplated, analyzed or included in the Ordinances, to now qualify for AB 2011 <br />streamlining. <br />The proposed ordinance amendments will revise the previously adopted AB 2011 exempt <br />parcels lists by removing sites that are less integral to the General Plan's vision and <br />adopted land use plan and adding sites to the previously adopted exempt parcels lists <br />that are key to implementing that vision. The proposed ordinance amendments will also <br />revise the previously adopted AB 2011 alternative and up -zoned parcels list. The lost <br />potential capacity from the amended exempt parcels lists will be covered by the surplus <br />capacity from the amended alternative and up -zoned parcels. <br />DISCUSSION <br />Over the last five years, numerous housing bills have been signed into law to address the <br />state's housing crisis. In general, changes to state law have attempted to solve the <br />housing crisis through limiting local land use controls to allow development proposals to <br />circumvent community review and comment, compliance with local land use plans, and <br />streamlining or exemption from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Cities <br />like Santa Ana that routinely exceed their Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) for <br />housing unit development are often not exempt from these laws. <br />Assembly Bill 2011 <br />AB 2011, known as the Affordable Housing and High Road Jobs Act of 2022, was <br />approved by the state legislature, signed into law by the Governor on September 28, <br />2022, and took effect July 1, 2023. The bill created a streamlined, ministerial approval <br />process for housing developments that meet specified objective standards, affordability, <br />site criteria, and wage and labor standards. Specifically, the bill will allowed residential <br />development on sites currently zoned and designated for commercial or retail uses. The <br />bill also created a CEQA-exempt, ministerial approval process for qualifying development <br />projects. The law provides different qualifying criteria for two categories of housing and <br />they include 100-percent affordable projects and mixed -income projects. The provisions <br />will sunset on January 1, 2033, unless extended through subsequent legislation. <br />AB 2011 includes a provision that permits local governments to exempt parcels from the <br />streamlining provisions permitted under the bill before a development proponent submits <br />a development application on a parcel provided certain findings are made. A local <br />government must identify one or more alternative sites for residential development that <br />would result in no net loss of the total potential residential density in the jurisdiction, no <br />net loss of the potential residential density of housing affordable to lower income <br />households in the jurisdiction, and will affirmatively further fair housing. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.