My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
NS-3072 - Repealing and Reenacting in Its Entirety Article XXI to Chapter 8 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code Prohibiting Short-Term Rentals
Clerk
>
Ordinances
>
2021 - 2030 (NS-3001 - NS-XXXX)
>
2024 (NS-3055 - NS-3073)
>
NS-3072 - Repealing and Reenacting in Its Entirety Article XXI to Chapter 8 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code Prohibiting Short-Term Rentals
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/6/2025 7:27:05 AM
Creation date
12/16/2024 8:28:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Ordinance
Agency
Planning & Building
Doc #
NS-3072
Item #
35
Date
12/3/2024
Destruction Year
P
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
69
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
uses. No u'ripacts would occur. The Modified Project would not result in any new or more severe significant <br />impacts than those identified in the GP EIR. <br />The GP EIR RRs HYD-1 through HYD-5 are not applicable to the Modified Project because the Modified <br />Project is not a development project. The Modified Project would not obstruct the City's ability to implement <br />applicable GP policies. <br />4.11 LAND USEAND PLANNING <br />According to Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines, -41 project would normally have a significant effect on die <br />environment if the project would: <br />LU-1 Physically divide an established community? <br />LU-2 Cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any land use plan, policy, or <br />regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? <br />Summary of Impacts in the GP EIR <br />As discussed in Section 5. 10. Laiyd Us-e and Plannin ,g, of the GP EIR, the Approved Project is intended to guide <br />growth and development (e.g., infill development, redevelopment, and revitalization/ restoration) in the plan <br />area d-irough the year 2045 and beyond. The changes in the land use designations that would occur with <br />implementation of the Approved Project would not result in the physical division of an established community <br />(GP EIR p. 5.10-17-5.10-19). The Approved Project would enhance the character of the city for existing <br />residents because no new roadways would bisect existing communities, associated street improvements would <br />serve the existing neighborhoods, the Approved Project encourages infi.11 development, and established General <br />Plan policies. Therefore, the impacts would be less than significant. <br />A portion of the city is witbin. the JWiVs safety compatibility Zone 6 and xvit4in the 60 dBA CNEL aircraft <br />operation noise contours, and a larger portion of the southeastern portion of the city is within Federal Aviation <br />Regulation Part 77 Obstruction Notification Area of JWA (GP EIR p. 5.10-19-5-10-20). Areas within an <br />AELUP and FAA Zones land use designations would remain, and no new or more 'intense development is <br />intended. Any project within an identified AELUP and FAA Zone would be required to comply with filing a <br />project for a consistency determination with the ALUC, FAA airspace protection regulations, and local <br />regulations. Furthermore, the Approved project would be consistent with goals of the Southern California <br />Association of Governments' RTP/SCS, and the Orange County Transportation Authority Congestion <br />Management Plan (GP EIR p. 5.10-20-26). The GP EIR concluded that the approved project would not <br />significantly conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation, and With implementation of GP policies and <br />RR LU-1, RR LU-2, and RR HAZ-7 impacts would be less than significant. <br />Analysis of the Modified Project <br />The Modified Project would expressly prohibit STRs and only affect existing structures. The Modified Project <br />would not require development, redevelopment, or changes to existing development types in the city. <br />Additionally, the existing conditions related to land use and planning have not changed since the certification <br />Ordinance NS-3072 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.