My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 32 - Second Reading of Uncodified Ordinance Amendment No. 2024-07
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2025
>
01/21/2025 Regular & Special SA
>
Item 32 - Second Reading of Uncodified Ordinance Amendment No. 2024-07
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/15/2025 1:37:54 PM
Creation date
1/15/2025 1:23:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
32
Date
1/21/2025
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
288
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Areas. Current development trends show that high residential density is feasible and realistic, and <br />appropriate to accommodate housing for all income levels and can be accommodated on the <br />alternative parcel sites. Sites that have been redeveloped include social lodges, religious facilities, <br />office buildings, industrial buildings, older/smaller multi-family residential, and single family units. <br />Exempt Sites <br />The sites exempted by the City are mostly concentrated along the west side of 17th Street, the <br />east side of 17th Street, and Tustin Avenue on the east. These sites are generally not in Focus <br />Areas or in areas that have been designated for redevelopment through the City’s General Plan. <br />Like the Alternative sites, the majority of the sites are in areas where the predominant population <br />is Hispanic or Latino, matching the demographics of the City. The City’s local AB 2011 <br />implementing ordinance exempted these parcels of land from the streamlining provisions with the <br />identification of one or more alternative sites for each that result in a no net loss of the permitted <br />residential density in the City. <br />Conclusion <br />In the case of predominant race, both the Alternative and Exempt sites are located in areas with <br />the majority of the population identifies as Hispanic or Latino. Ultimately the Alternative sites are <br />predominantly located in the central and northern areas of the City, where zoning and land use <br />plans support multi-family development. With access to high-quality public transit, including rapid <br />bus lines, the OC Streetcar, and connections to the Metrolink system via the Santa Ana Regional <br />Transportation Center (SARTC), these locations are well positioned to attract new investment. <br />This new development has the potential to improve conditions for both new and existing residents <br />by providing additional services and enhancing the overall quality of life for the entire community. <br />ATTACHMENT 3
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.