My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 32 - Second Reading of Uncodified Ordinance Amendment No. 2024-07
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2025
>
01/21/2025 Regular & Special SA
>
Item 32 - Second Reading of Uncodified Ordinance Amendment No. 2024-07
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/15/2025 1:37:54 PM
Creation date
1/15/2025 1:23:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
32
Date
1/21/2025
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
288
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Table 8 <br />Domains and List of Indicators for Opportunity Maps <br />Domain Indicator <br />Economic <br />Poverty <br />Adult education <br />Employment <br />Job proximity <br />Median home value <br />Environmental CalEnviroScreen 4.0 pollution Indicators and values <br />Education <br />Math proficiency <br />Reading proficiency <br />High School graduation rates <br />Student poverty rates <br />Poverty and Racial Segregation <br />Poverty: tracts with at least 30% of population under <br />federal poverty line <br />Racial Segregation: Tracts with location quotient <br />higher than 1.25 for Blacks, Hispanics, Asians, or all <br />people of color in comparison to the County <br />Source: California Fair Housing Task Force, Methodology for TCAC/HCD Opportunity Maps. <br />Regional Trend <br />HUD Opportunity Indicator scores for Orange County are shown in Table 9. For the county, the <br />White population, including the population below the federal poverty line, received the highest <br />scores in low poverty, labor market participation, jobs proximity, and environmental health. <br />Hispanic communities scored the lowest in low poverty, school proficiency, and labor market <br />participation. Asian or Pacific Islander (non-Hispanic) communities scored the lowest in <br />environmental health and jobs proximity, and was most likely to use public transit. <br />ATTACHMENT 3
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.