Laserfiche WebLink
Analysis Supporting Categorical Exemption <br /> Fairview Street was constructed circa 1890 and the four residences were constructed in 1950 and, <br /> therefore,exceedsthe 50-year age threshold to be considered a cultural resource.ECORP evaluated North <br /> Fairview Street and 2501 Huckleberry Road, 2502 Huckleberry Road, 2501 Strawberry Lane, and 2502 <br /> Strawberry Lane for historical significance in accordance with CEQA and Section 106 of the National <br /> Historic Preservation Act(NHPA)as well as its implementing regulations. In addition, ECORP evaluated the <br /> resources against the criteria for listing in the City of Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties. The <br /> evaluation was prepared pursuant to City of Santa Ana requirements under CEQA for the demolition <br /> project. <br /> ECORP's evaluation included a records search, literature review, focused archival and historical research, <br /> and an intensive site survey of the Project Area(Appendix E).The records search results indicated that the <br /> four subject residences have not been previously recorded or evaluated for historic significance in <br /> accordance with any State or Federal criteria. Because they are over 50 years old, are proposed to be <br /> demolished, and have not been previously evaluated for historical significance, a current architectural <br /> history evaluation is warranted. <br /> ECORP found North Fairview Street and the residences at 2501 Huckleberry Road,2502 Huckleberry Road, <br /> 2501 Strawberry Lane,and 2502 Strawberry Lane do not meet any of the criteria for listing in the National <br /> Register of Historic Places,California Register of Historical Resources,or the City of Santa Ana Register of <br /> Historical Properties, either individually or as part of an existing historic district. Therefore, they are not <br /> Historical Resources in accordance with CEQA, or a Historic Property in accordance with Section 106 of <br /> the NHPA. <br /> 4.5.6 Conclusion <br /> No historical buildings are located in the vicinity of the site and no proposed activities are planned in <br /> native,non-disturbed soils.As such, the Project is unlikely to impact unanticipated cultural resources or <br /> Historical Resources as defined by CEQA. <br /> 4.6 Geology and Soils <br /> The Project limits are confined to the relatively level Fairview Street. No significant impacts would occur in <br /> association with loss of topsoil.Construction of the Project would not increase the risk of ground failure. <br /> Increased risk to people or structures from strong seismic ground shaking, liquefaction, seismic-related <br /> ground failure, landslide, and expansive soils would not occur as a result of the Project. Therefore, the <br /> Project would have a less than significant impact in this regard. <br /> 4.7 Greenhouse Gas Emissions <br /> 4.7.1 Project Construction-Generated Greenhouse Gas Emissions <br /> A potent source of GHG emissions associated with the Proposed Project would be combustion of fossil <br /> fuels during construction activities. Construction-related activities that would generate GHG emissions <br /> include worker commute trips, haul trucks carrying supplies and materials to and from the Project Site, <br /> ECORP Consulting, Inc. 16 January 2025 <br /> Fairview Street Widening Project 2024-088.03 <br /> 9-28 <br />